#adamval

[randomrandomalright]

I’m bit curious how the ship dynamics of Val x Adam would work… both (heavily hated) sexual antagonists… it would sure as hell be a toxic relationship, both feeding into each others bad actions… yet sinneradam x overlordval sounds interesting.

[eklesia-system]

I'm gay and I think this might be the gayest thing I've ever said. Honestly proud of myself for producing such out of context gold.

No, I will not be providing any context this evening.

-Adam V

[adam-the-fictive]

Introduction

Hey, I'm Adam V. So, this is gonna be my side blog. I'm a pretty new member of @eklesia-system and I've fronted so much since I formed that I'm already a system host.

I'm pretty much canon-aligned. Everything that happened in the show, happened to me. Of course I'm also influenced by stuff Cy's made to take place in their developing "season 3" comic series and the headcanons expressed in that project. THAT is technically my source.

Sigh... obligatory disclaimer that this is NOT a roleplay account. I am a fictive, which is a type of alter in a plural system or a multiple with OSDD/DID whose source is a fictional character.

I am NOT Adam from the Hollow but I don't mind being treated as the source. Ask me questions you would ask canon Adam. I encourage it. :)

-Adam V

My System My Source Main Fandom Account

[valarioncy]

Heeey Hollow fandom. :0 If ya don't know, we're a system and there's a ton of Hollow fictives and AUtives here. So, I was thinking, and Adam V was thinking, hey, why don't we make a couple side blogs for ourselves? We could do asks and make posts and have the blogs completely to ourselves!

Me and Adam V are the only ones who wanna run our own blogs yet. I dunno exactly what to do with a side blog but I'm sure I can think of something. :0

I think we'd just need to make it clear that we're fictives and not like, roleplay accounts or something.

-Skeet

Yeah, we aren't our sources, guys. And we're not roleplaying as our sources either. But, we are interested in interacting with the fandom as ourselves, in some way.

(Oh, and the Adam that posted the other day isn't the same Adam. That's Adam from the Beyondverse and he hates being called a fictive. I'm more canon-aligned and I'm chill with being called a fictive. So you know. He goes by Adam D.)

-Adam V

UPDATE: Adam's account is here

[adam-the-fictive]

Wishing myself a very merry unbirthday.

today is not my birthday

[maidservant-hecubus]

I like his nose and I like his scar and also angles. And also freckles.

ijustthinkhesneat.marge.png

Idk what he's looking at here. Perhaps the vast emptiness of space that reminds him of where his heart used to be.

Photo reference of Adam used. You all know which one.

[eklesia-system]

Actual headspace exchange time.

Adam V: (fronting, eating leftover Chinese food for lunch)

Sleet: (peeking over his shoulder, co-conscious, and judging how slowly Adam is eating) You know you're gonna have to reheat that eggroll, right?

Adam V: Yeah. (pokes the lukewarm eggroll)

Sleet: Are you gonna do that now, or after you finish the rice?

Adam V: Probably after. (touches the eggroll again) …Actually I'm just gonna eat it now. (takes a bite of the lukewarm eggroll)

Sleet: (exasperated) Oh my gooooosh.

EDIT:

Adam V: (finishing the rice, which has gone cold)

Sleet: Now you're just eating the rice cold. ToT Whyyy? Why are you doing this to yourself?

Adam V: (finishes the rice after a bit) OK now I'm gonna reheat the eggroll.

Sleet: AAAAAAA

[adam-the-fictive]

Asks are turned on. I forgot to do it but my good friend Reeve turned them on for me. Thanks, Reeve. I appreciate you.

-ghost written by Reeve

oh my god, reeve -Adam V (from the back)

(He did a job interview this morning and now he's trying to rest. We got the job btw. -Reeve)

[adam-the-fictive]

Rooting for my fellow fictives.

And honestly I need more fictive positivity to share. And more fictives to share their experiences with being fictives instead of people talking ABOUT fictives.

Here’s some positivity for fictive-heavy systems!

While some people might insist that a system having lots of fictives means they’re faking or invalid in some way, this is absolutely not the case! In fact, fictive-heavy systems have always been and will always be special, valued, and integral members of the plural community. So this post is for every system with lots of fictive members!

Is your system made up entirely of fictives? That’s perfectly fine, and your system is valid and lovely just the way it is! It’s okay to have only fictives in your system, and your system is still a precious and important part of the plural community!

Do the fictives in your system hold important roles, regularly help take care of your system, do things like handle chores, work, or school, and play a big role in your system’s functioning overall? That’s amazing! And we’re so happy to hear the fictives in your system are so able and willing to help out - their efforts are recognized and so very appreciated!

Whether your system’s fictives love their sources and are very connected to them, don’t want anything to do with their sources and are separating from them, feel indifferent to their sources, or anything else, remember there’s no wrong way to think or feel about your source! As long as your system’s fictives are staying safe and happy, it’s okay for them to identify as they wish! It’s not “cringe” to be a fictive and also be fictionkin, to have your source as your special interest/hyperfixation, or to want to engage in your source actively!

It’s okay if your system’s fictives are often lost and confused, if they struggle to determine exomemories from real memories, or feel disconnected from themselves because they’re in the real world and not their source! It’s okay if your system’s fictives don’t have any exomemories, or feel like they firmly belong in the real world without sharing any connections to their source! There’s no wrong way to be a headmate or a fictive, and their experiences are real, valid, and important just the way they are!

We hope all you fictive-heavy systems can find peace, joy, belonging, and self-acceptance today and every day! Know that you are so special and important, and you are a cherished part of the plural community just the way you are! We hope you can continue to make the most of life and find pleasure in the mundane and camaraderie with the rest of your headmates! Remember we care about you, we’re rooting for you, and we’re wishing you the very best in all that you do! Thanks so much for reading, and take care!

[gay4katiemcgrath]

I just red a post that said Lena didn’t kill Adam because he was wide aware of the risks and she tried to stop the trial and I agree he knew what he was risking but what Lena is doing is still wrong, experimenting with people risking lives in exchange of money IS bad, it’s why people are against animal cruelty brands beauty or pharmaceutical it’s wrong. Lena IS wrong and doing bad things with those trials

Are we watching the same show? Where did Lena ever say the purpose of these experiments was financial gain? She’s a businesswoman sure but I don’t remember money being the driving force behind her decision to commence these trials but correct me if I’m wrong.

I do agree though that it’s risky and it’s something that Lena is well aware of, a point she herself made multiple times, particularly when she all but shut down the trial because of the risk it posed but Adamv very encouragingly swayed her mind to continue because he saw the potential in what she’s doing. Also Lena made it clear that Adam was free to leave and she even gave him his payment when she tried to stop it but each time he explicitly and willingly consented. 

What Lena’s doing is important, she’s not simply trying to develop a new lipstick shade or eyeshadow palate or something trivial, she’s actually trying to cure ALL diseases. Now in order to do that, I can see where human experiments and trials would be necessary and it’s not something that’s new knowledge. Every medical breakthrough and development throughout history has involved human experiments, some horrific and some not. I’m not condoning it but for example if William Beaumont didn’t conduct human trials, we wouldn’t know how gastric physiology works or more famously, Jonas Salk who developed a polio vaccine wouldn’t have been successful if he didn’t first use himself and his family as the initial test subjects. Presently it’s well known that human clinical trials are being conducted to find a cure for literally any and every thing from HIV, cancer to alzheimer’s. 

This is all done for the advancement of medicine and science that would only benefit the world and it’s generally accepted....so why should Lena be any different? Why should Lena be looked at as a mad scientist or a murderer because she’s trying to rid the world of sickness? Has she kidnapped test subjects and held them against their will? Does she treat them horrifically or inhumanely? No. She’s incredibly professional, caring and informed so I honestly cannot for the life of me understand this blanket statement that oh she’s wrong. It’s because she’s a Luthor isn’t it? 

The one thing I do think is sticky is the fact that humans will get super powers because that’s a double edged sword right there. Obviously there’s a positive in it but should that sort of power fall into the wrong hands then it’ll be a nightmare so on that one I think she should thread carefully. The human clinic trials though, for the purpose of curing illnesses, I’m totally on board with the way she’s conducting them. 

‘Only those who will risk going too far can possibly find out how far it is possible to go.’ 

[life-of-luxe]

The Under-the-Radar Excellence of ADAMVS Napa Valley

No strangers to winemaking when they founded Napa Valley’s ADAMVS, Denise and Stephen Adams had perfected their vinous technique as proprietors

... via JustLuxe.com via https://ift.tt/j78vpZs

[eklesia-system]

Bonus if they're all sourced from the same dude.

-Adam V

In true system fashion we got the mean one, the nice one, and the one fucked up beyond human comprehension

[haybug1]

What To Drink Now: Raise A Glass To Earth Day

Happy Earth Day! Please go outside your front door, or to your balcony, or an open window, and take a deep, healing breath. The air right now throughout the world is some of the cleanest we’ve experienced in decades.

Breath deep – Take a moment – Appreciate oxygen…and raise a glass to Mother Earth.

As the world enters day 20, 30, or 40 of this global stay-in-place amid the coronavirus pandemic,…

[artigojuridico-blog]

Veja em Artigo Jurídico

https://artigojuridico.com.br/2017/03/30/stj-busca-e-apreensao-realizada-com-constrangimento-pode-gerar-indenizacao-por-dano-moral/

STJ: Busca e apreensão realizada com constrangimento pode gerar indenização por dano moral

  A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) confirmou julgamento do Tribunal de Justiça de Santa Catarina (TJSC) que condenou duas empresas ao pagamento de indenização por danos morais por considerar que elas constrangeram uma terceira empresa após determinação cautelar de busca e apreensão de bens supostamente falsificados. A decisão, tomada de forma unânime, afastou apenas a condenação de uma das empresas por litigância de má-fé.

No pedido de indenização, a empresa Mahe Comércio de Jóias alegou que sofreu constrangimento ilegal em virtude da execução de medida cautelar de busca e apreensão. A medida foi determinada em ação na qual as empresas Mormaii e J.R. Adamver afirmaram que a Mahe comercializava produtos falsificados das marcas autoras. A ação foi posteriormente julgada improcedente.

Segundo a Mahe, o constrangimento não seria fruto da decisão judicial, mas da abordagem sofrida pelos representantes das empresas após a determinação de busca e apreensão, que foi considerada excessiva.

Autorização do Judiciário

O pedido de indenização foi acolhido em primeira instância, com o arbitramento de compensação por danos morais no valor de R$ 2 mil. A sentença foi mantida pelo TJSC, que ainda condenou a Mormaii por litigância de má-fé.

No recurso especial, a Mormaii argumentou que o procedimento de busca e apreensão foi realizado de forma regular, com autorização da justiça, o que afastaria eventual dano moral a ser compensado. A empresa também contestou a condenação por má-fé, já que o cabimento de danos morais no caso discutido não seria pacífico na jurisprudência.

Dano comprovado

A relatora, ministra Nancy Andrighi, destacou inicialmente que, para que a execução de medida cautelar de busca e apreensão seja capaz de causar dano moral indenizável à pessoa jurídica, é preciso que sua reputação e seu nome tenham sido comprovadamente ofendidos.

No caso concreto, a ministra ressaltou que o TJSC condenou a empresa por ter reconhecido que o procedimento de busca e apreensão foi realizado durante o funcionamento da loja, inclusive na presença de clientes e funcionários.

“Observa-se, assim, da moldura fática delimitada no acórdão recorrido, que o tribunal de origem entendeu, com base nas provas produzidas nos autos, ter ficado demonstrada a ocorrência de ofensa à honra objetiva da recorrida, relacionada à sua reputação e à qualidade dos produtos que comercializa”, concluiu a ministra ao manter a condenação por danos morais.

Todavia, acompanhando o voto da relatora, o colegiado afastou a condenação de segunda instância por litigância de má-fé. Para a turma, a Mormaii “interpôs o recurso de apelação, o qual era o único e regularmente cabível para a impugnação da sentença que lhe tinha sido desfavorável, não tendo ficado, com isso, caracterizado seu intuito de protelar o deslinde da controvérsia, tampouco sua deslealdade com a parte adversa”.

Leia o acórdão.

Esta notícia refere-se ao(s) processo(s): REsp 1428493.

Fonte: STJ.

[okmuammer]

İzini sevmeyen adamv (Antalya, Turkey)

[adam-the-fictive]

As a fictive myself, it's kind of a funny story. Most of the headcanons and canon-canons are accurate to me, but I'm also exceedingly self confident (not a trait any of my other sourcemates share and is rare for our system in general), way more unmasked compared to my source, and apparently autoromantic. That last one was no headcanon of ours or anyone else's to our knowledge.

And that's just the stuff I actually wanna share.

People should NEVER force their headcannons on fictives!! Yes, this includes even within your own system. For example, if you have a fictive of an eldritch being who doesn't understand human romantic concepts, you can headcannon them as aroflux, that's fine, but if you actively TELL the fictive they're aroflux, and try to make them believe it, that's fucked up.

FICTIVES ARE NOT YOUR BLORBOS YOU CAN PROJECT YOUR HEADCANNONS ONTO!!!!

.