#How to Get Divorce from Husband in Islam

[feministfang]

Islam is the most misogynistic religion on earth. It’s the most oppressive cult for women among all abrahamic religions. Women can’t get out of their house. Women have to hide themselves in black tents they wear from head to toe. Women can’t even show one strand of hair. Check out the comments under any Pakistani female celebrity’s post and you will be disgusted. Women get attacked by religious bigots even for wearing half-sleeves. Women can’t initiate divorce easily and a lot of them are stuck in abusive marriages. Women are supposed to obey their husbands and can’t deny sex or they will be cursed by their god. Marital rape is allowed and encouraged in islam. Parents’ inheritance is not divided equally between brothers and sisters because women are expected to get married and rely financially on their husbands. Only men can be authority figures and be leaders, women are supposed to be quiet and submissive. Their prophet (idol) was literally a fuckin pedo. And these are just a few examples of how women are treated in islam. I don’t get how these dumbass muslim women still find the audacity to say shit like 'iSlAm iS tHe mOst peAceFul rEligIoN and tHe mOst fEmiNistic religion cAusE iT gAve wOmEn tHeIr rIgHts 1400 yeaRs aGo' what right?? Where’s the right lol?? All i see is oppression and violence in your religion. You can’t even give your opinion without some man’s permission but because his money is your money and your money is also yours you think islam fulfilled all your desires. It’s true that the more religious a person is, the more narrow-minded they are but muslim women have crossed all limits of stupidity. So glad i cut off such people from my life and saved one woman from converting to islam. ☪️ancer religion!!

[mad-scientist-enthusiast]

Real Rashid thought Daniel Molloy's book would be his big break. Once a well-respected agent of the Talamasca with a window office in the London HQ, Rashid felt that he had been demoted in a way by having to play butler in Dubai for the past 5 years. He really thought he could crack this Armand guy by appealing to his upbringing in the Islamic faith, however he severely underestimated just how long it had been since the subject was last human. Armand was alien to him; a creature he couldn't begin to understand. But still, Rashid tried his best to do so, eventually working his way up the penthouse staff until he became the personal assistant of the undead couple. He expected a breakthrough— maybe a promotion in the Talamasca, or a raise in his pay from the vampires—but none came. Instead he suffered through ushering purchased victims to their inhuman executioner, setting the table for a meal of freshly sedated rabbit, and sanitizing the bedroom after some particularly messy BDSM activities. Rashid quickly learned that all the blood he had to clean was actually his employers' ejaculate, which caused him to take a massive hit of psychic damage each time he rinsed it off of one of their silicone sex toys. All this is to say, Rashid really thought Daniel would be his ticket out. The man was an expert at pissing these vampires off; he knew just where to strike his blows, what questions to ask, what faults to uncover. Rashid knew this would end with a bang, however this was not the kind of bang he anticipated. Rashid had no problem with gay people; he hung out with a few queers in his time at Oxford. But there's a difference between being gay, and impersonating your staff member for a BDSM roleplay thing with your husband to psychosexually manipulate an old man. He thought the explosive divorce would be the end of these antics, but that was foolish of Rashid. As he walked to the bedroom door, iPad in hand, hoping to catch the vampire Armand in a moment of solace so that the two of them could finalize his divorce settlement with Louis de Pointe du Lac, he heard the faint sound of movement inside. That should have been enough to put him off, but in his defense, he really didn't expect to open the door and see his employer spreading a pair of 69 year old asscheeks and promptly sticking his tongue inside. Daniel Molloy, his one saving grace, was handcuffed to the bars behind the bed and decidedly very naked. His whole body was flushed and blood dripped from his neck and other places where Armand had undoubtedly bit him. It was then that Daniel Molloy looked over at him, and Rashid felt his blood run cold. All his hopes and dreams of getting out of this job flew out the window. He could see it already; Armand taking him with when he moves out of the penthouse, and he'd be playing butler for another 5 years—this time in America where Armand has moved in with Daniel Molloy. Rashid had witnessed more than his fair share of vampire genitals in his time with Armand and Louis, and he did NOT want to see any more wrinkled old man dick!! And so it was then that Real Rashid finally decided to quit his job. The Talamasca did not have good enough healthcare benefits to make up for the psychological damage he would have from staying under Armand's employment.

[radfemsiren]

Hi Siren! How do you think muslim women are able to accept Muhammad and his actions toward women? It seems that Muhammad is a particularly sex obsessed and immoral religious figure . Say what you want about christianity, but at the very least Jesus was supposed to be the ideal most pure individual to walk the earth. What does it say about a religion when a minor figure such as Jesus is more moral than the most holy prophet? Muhammad on the other hand had sex with a nine year old little girl, promises men sex parties with virgins in heaven and does not even pretend to believe that women are human at all. It’s just so over the top. t’s like, adultery and promiscuity is not really bad, just on earth. One cannot even "pretend" that the religion has been corrupted by man or something, the very text itself is so bad. Is there anything for women at all?

Hello, this is a good ask because I feel like a lot of people see the criticisms I offer about Islam on my blog, and they foster a misconception that Muslim women are stupid and docile.

The extremely misogynistic evidence I find in Islamic teachings are purposefully mystified to be not widely known, or lessened in their intensity. Most Muslims are not Arabic speaking, so Muslim leaders also warp translations to seem nicer and more palatable for a general audience. I had to dig to find the core of these ugly parts of the faith, and when I would bring them up in masjids, it made everyone uncomfortable, especially the religious teachers. They don’t just openly and bluntly say women are inferior: they use deceptive wording, mistranslations, and well practiced arguments to make Islam seem like a “feminist religion.” Me doing research and bringing up unspeakable topics is not the norm: I felt safe doing it all the time because my family moved constantly, and I knew there was be no real consequences like ostracization or violence.

As a teen I made a name for this phenomenon: The 2 Muhammads

1 Muhammad loved and cherished all his wives, instructing male Muslims to treat their wives “like expensive vases.” He said daughters were a precious gift, and raising 3 (or 2) right would guarantee heaven. He said that a man that comes home and his wife and children cower in fear of him would not go to heaven. 1 Muhammad would feed the poor, cuddle kittens, let children climb on and play on him while he led prayer, and he “emancipated” the women of the pre Islamic era from infanticide and other forms of mass violence. He generously bestowed on them the right to divorce, the right to half her husbands earning, the right to be protected when she traveled (many of these things are untrue but this is what they are teaching)

2 Muhammad is a shadowy figure only brought up sparingly, when used to criticize and scare the disobedient children, and women. He said if you listen to music, you go to hell! If you draw eyes, if you date, if you don’t listen to your husband… hell! Hell! Hell! He is almost never out in the open, and his greatest sins, like his youngest wife Aisha, is never spoken about. Kill apostates! Kill unbelievers where you find them! Sacrifice your life for Allah! Rape captured women in war! He is the real Muhammad, with far more religious texts matching this personality of his, but he gets less airtime. He’s camera shy 😔

I’ll make an indepth post about the specific arguments used to control Muslim women, in my anti-Islam feminist toolkit! It will layout my arguments for why Islam is misogynistic, and counter arguments I suggest for when they try to shut down criticism! It will be easy for anyone to read, not just ex Muslims.

[voxpraxis]

lately i've been... idk if you can really call it "debating" but i've been interacting with some muslims in the comments of an instagram reel in which a young girl was speaking to a young boy (i want to emphasize that they are both children) and telling him that she wasn't allowed to speak to boys until she was married, because her parents and her religion said so. the boy was sad but replied with something like "oh, alright" and the caption & comments were all talking about how "sweet" the situation was. i commented that i didn't think it was sweet, and actually that's a horrible thing to put in a child's mind. the post never directly mentioned islam and neither did i, but everyone who's been replying to me is proselytizing islam, so. anyway, these are the points that have been thrown at me so far:

it's not wrong because both genders are forced apart from each other

in response to me saying it still enforces an extreme divide between genders and encourages them to see each other as opposites rather than equals: the separation is necessary to prevent rape

there is no rape in islam because of the separation between men and women, rape only occurs in western society because men and women are not separated (...because apparently we cannot expect men to not rape women unless they're physically kept away from them at all times)

rape does not happen between family members, it's just not a real thing, ever (incest doesn't exist?)

if you're interested in a girl you should marry her immediately, because dating leads to cheating

men and women cannot be just friends because "islam and science and psychology says so." one guy said it's because "women can't talk about cars and sports"

(i also got called a simp for saying i have female friends. can't make this shit up)

in response to me pointing out that what the girl is saying implies that she won't have any say in who her husband is: arranged marriages are better because they always work out and unlike western marriages, they never end in divorce! (i'll give you one guess why that is.)

similarly, single parent families and suicide are solely western problems

men and women are NOT equal

i need to shut up and respect it because that's their religion

islam cannot be questioned because islam says islam is true

and that's not including all the personal insults and threats i've received, in just a few days.

i will say this is one of the least challenging "debates" i've ever had, in the sense that almost no point brought against me has any logical foundation and is easily refutable. but it's one of the most frustrating because the problem is that they won't hear me at all, because islam teaches its followers to never consider anything else. it teaches them to accept exactly what they are spoon-fed as the ultimate truth. and this is by no means a problem exclusive to islam, but islam does this kind of control better than any other religion i know. people raised into islam are not taught to think in any logical terms - in fact, they're deliberately taught to avoid thinking logically. logical fallacies are the rule. so not only can they barely form a coherent argument in favour of their beliefs, but they have absolutely no clue how illogical they sound sometimes. when i point out a lapse in logic in something they've said, the response i get is "no, that's true because islam says it's true." no other explanation required. at least, i've sometimes heard people of other religions attempt to use logic or science to prove their beliefs, but with the muslims in these comments, those are unnecessary things to be absolutely avoided - it's like they don't even understand why i'd bother to use them. you can't use logic to get through to them because they've been taught to avoid logic and cling to the mantra of islam-is-true-because-islam-says-so.

[nityarawal]

12/09/2023

John-June*

Morning Songs

What If

There Were Only 5

Names

Like In Indo

Or Christian

Psalms

What If

There Were 

Only A Few

Beatles

What Would 

We Do

Somehow

They Were Duplicated 

Somehow They Breed

How'd All The

Yogis

Come Together

In A World Wide Web

In Case

You Forget

Your Childhood

In Case

It Was Really Bad

Please Remember

We Sang "Hey

Jude,"* For You

Got 2 Julian's

God Kids

One Jude

Please Remember

We Know

A Song

Is Never Enough

But If Your Dad

Is Gone

Like Millions

Of Military

Brats

Suffer

Through

Estrangement

Or The Queen's

Court

If Your Parent

Is Gone

On A Feloners

Plea

Please Don't Offer

Us

Special Forces

Survival Services

Bloody Weapons

Special Forces

Or Boobs

In The Face 

Motorboats

With Our Tax

Dollars

Embedded In Tesla

Stocks

Doje

Smearing

Beloved Bros

And Dogs

Flying To Mars

With Our

Hearts

Intact

Might Have Been

Possible

But,"Now

And Then,"*

I'm Not Really

Sure

"Now And Then,"

I Miss

My Father's Weathered

Hand

"Now And Then,"

My Own John

Sitting In Our

RV

Driving Coast To Coast

In Love

Thinkin' How Lucky

I Was

"Now And Then,"

I Miss My Pa

My "Lennon" Brother

Overflowing

With Intelligence

Secret

Middle Name

"John"

"Now And Then,"

I Miss My Pa

His Weathered Hand

Was Like A

Beating Heart

For America

"Now And Then,"

I Miss My Pa

I Know I'll Never

Add Up Mamma

"Now And Then,"

I Miss 

My Pa

I Wish That

J.D. Salinger

Cult Felony

Hadn't Gotten

Your John-

June

In The Name

Of Jihad*

"Catcher In The Rye,"

Twisted Anti-Semitism*

Like JFK

But That's Not

The Case With

"The Cajun Queen,"*

She's Spicey

Not Caged

James Dean

Not The Case

With Grandma Julia

If We Can't 

Say Anything

Nice

About Reptiles*

At Court

The Attorneys

Who Broke

Our Son's Hearts

It Wasn't Her

June

It Wasn't Her

Jude

It Wasn't Her

Julian

Bambinos

All Those Pretty

Places

Tibetan Yogini

Retreats

India

Maharishi Days*

All Those "White,"

Houses In Bali

Japan

Indonesia

Or

Thailand

It Wasn't Her

June

It Wasn't Durga*

It Wasn't Your

Own Eternal 

Mother

Saraswati*

I Can Assure

You

From The "White Album"*

Oaths

It Wasn't Me

#Nitya4Eternity

Lakshmi*

Who Deleted

Your Songs

On Twitter*

Banned Us

With Gags

It Wasn't Me

I Miss The "Beatles"*

Just As Much

As Anyone!

(#4BillionMothersStrong Grieving Our Young.)

Peace,

Nitya Nella Davigo Azam Moezzi Huntley Rawal 

*June- "Dear" In Farsi

#Irany #WithLove

"Hey Jude," Written for Julian Lennon by Paul & John; in hideous atty driven court estrangement.

Love long unedited version they released- even if it's slightly Censored by BBC & UK politics.

Most songs I post of theirs get shadowbanned same day.

Very worried about Beatles kids & families. I think "Julia," was not only written for John's mom but also secretly for Julian and to tie him into his matriarchal lineage- even if cut short.

Often rockstars and royals had Divorce/custodial Gag orders from Queen that were so violent, they end in death; like John Lennon and Princess Diana. 

"Now And Then," Amazing New Beatles Song Miraculously used #AI to revive John Lennon's vocals. As a reply everyone wants a Johnny doll. We feel they should be used only exclusively for close family in appropriate fatherly or husband manner; not a sex toy for government to manipulate and barter in AI as x has done with my children and I; his creator AI alien Grimesz.

Elon is nothing but a "Kiterunner" sex slave for America like Prince, Michael Jackson and so many atty puppets before them. Lab dads.):

*Jihad is a Anti Islamic term used when America creates Pseodo Terrorism and murders our great leaders and artists. #RIPJohnLennon #RIPJFK #Prayers4BoppaEternal xo

*Anti-semitism is a racist neo-nazi term often used by oppressors themselves Trafficking our women through government 9/11 internal domestic terrorism and wars abroad. This is gaslighting for "Nasa" when boys clubs won't allow our chivalrous men to behave appropriately, with honors, to deserve honors. 

*Reptiles- Queen Elizabeth is Often referred to as the "Reptilian" Queen.

*Durga - Goddess Of Protection/Defense

*Saraswati-Goddess Of Art & Music

Lakshmi- Goddess Of Wealth & Prosperity

*White Album

Made In India

Beatles

With Maharishi Mahesh Yogi

*Beatles music & friends royalties also hacked by open #AI & atty crimes; aka Michael Jackson's living probate criminal estate. #FreeBritney

#Metoo

Whose a Meme?

Will we ever know????

We're all the nasty stories just evil smear campaigns? 

Jai Guru Dev

#BeatlesKids

[questionsonislam]

How can a woman get "Khula" (divorcement)?

If a woman wants to divorce, it is necessary that her husband give her the right to divorce. If a married woman wants to divorce and her husband does not divorce her, the families can choose an arbitration committee and the divorce can be realized.

A woman is religiously the wife of the man whom she performed a marriage; therefore she cannot marry anybody else unless her husband divorces her.

The things that can be done in such a situation is to make the man divorce the woman or to divorce them through an arbitration committee.

In a situation like that, it is not right for the man not to insist on not divorcing the woman only in order to harm her. (al-Baqara, 2/231).

Therefore, in a situation like that, a respectable, wise, virtuous scholar should go and talk to the man as a mediator and tell him that he should end a marriage that does not benefit him at all, that the religious marriage cannot be used to satisfy oneself by harming the woman and that it is contrary to Islam; he should persuade the man to divorce the woman.

If the man insists on not divorcing, the families of the woman and man choose an arbiter each because they cannot apply to the court since there is not an official marriage. If one of the families does not agree to choose an arbiter, the other family can choose a just and impartial arbiter for them.

The arbiters try to arbitrate first. If there is a real necessity, they can decide to divorce the man and the woman even if the spouses do not consent.

After a divorce like that takes place and the waiting period for the woman ends, the woman can marry again.

In order to prevent such incidents from happening, it is necessary to perform official marriage contracts and have a legal assurance. The young people or their families who say that they are religious people may deny the contracts they have made among themselves when there is no official recording and one of the parties, usually the woman, faces a difficult situation.

Thus, let alone realizing the high aim that our religion assumes out of the marriage, people try to oppress one another using the religion.

[mithliya]

ive heard that women can initiate divorce in islam but only through a court and only on certain conditions. what are those conditions and how does this whole process work (from beginning to end)? does it work in the womens favour at all?

i’m not sure. in my sect of islam, women cannot initiate divorce whatsoever. my aunt was in an abusive marriage and couldnt even end it bc he didn’t want to divorce, he used his power to demand money and many other privileges just to let her divorce him. there’s many cases of shi’i women not being allowed to initiate divorce despite being abused and harmed but once their husband gets bored and divorces them, the women end up losing custody of their kids as well. it’s terrible.

[vintage-love-nasha]

Yeh saali zindagi.

I think I’m slowly training my heart to accept that I will be alone forever . Whatever little and innocent dream I had of having a child and getting married might not even happen because every guy I have met is so hesitant to associate with me due to his own fucked up pre judgements . I think I have been very understanding and caring but if someone truly thinks I’m fucked up and not worthy of their time or attention I should simply fuck off from their lives and never try to change the way they think about me.

I know I have flaws but I’m not a bad person. If someone can accept another girl who has nothing much to offer then why the fuck is it so hard to accept me? It is hard because I’ve never ever been given a full fucking chance to prove myself .

I seriously wish in Islam there was some rule where you can just have a baby with any guy and not even have to marry him because I don’t give a fuck about marriage at all anymore . And I’m so done with people shoving their husbands and happily married life in my face .

Like I get it, a guy loves you and married you. You don’t have to fucking constantly rub it in to show me that you were the chosen one while I was discarded . I know I am discarded , despite giving marriage utmost priority , despite not even having any career aspirations , I’m still where I don’t deserve to be. Work was never priority , marriage was always on my mind .

It wouldn’t have hurt so bad if a guy got married to me, used me, dumped me and divorced afterwards, because then at least I could’ve told my heart that you experienced married life.

But the fact that I was never even chosen, I don’t know what the fuck I’m even waiting for in life anymore . Everything upsets me and annoys me. It hurts really bad to never been chosen anywhere .

Im like the only person in my entire family , and by entire I mean including my extended family, who has never gotten married . How much more fucked up can life get.

X

[yaraheemu]

Most Effective Dua To Stop Divorce in Islam

Marriage is a special bond that Allah has blessed us with. But sometimes, things don't go as we hope, and misunderstandings or hardships can lead to thoughts of divorce. As Muslims, we believe that Allah can solve every problem. By making sincere duas (prayers) and trusting Allah, we can ask for His help to save our marriages. Here are some simple duas that can help stop divorce, improve marital relationships, and bring peace between a husband and wife.

Dua to Save Marriage from Divorce

When things get tough in a marriage, we should turn to Allah for help. Divorce should be the last option, and before thinking of it, we should try our best to ask Allah for guidance. Here is a dua to stop divorce you can recite to save your marriage:

Dua: “Rabbana hab lana min azwajina wa dhurriyyatina qurrata a’yunin waj ‘alna lil muttaqeena imama” (Translation: "Our Lord, grant us from among our wives and offspring comfort to our eyes and make us an example for the righteous.") [Surah Al-Furqan, 25:74]

How to Recite:

Recite this dua 7 times after every salah (prayer).

Ask Allah from your heart to bring peace into your marriage.

Continue this for 21 days and trust that Allah will guide you.

This dua is very powerful, and when recited with a pure heart, Allah can soften the hearts of both husband and wife and bring them closer.

Dua to Improve Marital Relationship

Sometimes, a husband and wife face challenges that make it hard to communicate or understand each other. For those moments, making dua to improve the relationship is very important. Here’s a dua that can help you strengthen your bond:

Dua: “Wa aslah li fi dhurriyati inni tubtu ilayka wa inni minal muslimeen” (Translation: "And make my children righteous. Indeed, I have repented to You, and indeed, I am of the Muslims.") [Surah Ahqaf, 46:15]

How to Recite:

Read this dua 11 times after Fajr prayer.

Make sure to ask Allah to help both of you understand each other and solve the problems between you.

Do this for 14 days and keep faith in Allah’s mercy.

Improving the relationship takes effort from both sides, but with this dua, you are also inviting Allah to help guide you through the difficulties.

Dua to Stop Divorce (Avoid Divorce)

If you fear that divorce might be the next step in your marriage, make dua to stop divorce to avoid it. Allah has the power to change the hardest hearts and remove all obstacles. Here is a simple dua to avoid divorce and rebuild your marriage:

Dua: “Rabbi inni lima anzalta ilayya min khairin faqeer” (Translation: "My Lord, indeed I am, for whatever good You would send down to me, in need.") [Surah Al-Qasas, 28:24]

How to Recite:

Recite this dua 100 times daily.

After reciting, ask Allah for His blessings on your marriage and to keep you both together.

Continue this practice for 40 days, and insha’Allah (God willing), you will see improvement.

Why Making Dua is Important in Marriage

Marriage is a union that needs constant care. Just like we take care of our health and family, we should also take care of our marriage. Dua is a way to invite Allah’s blessings into our lives and to ask for His protection. Allah knows what’s best for us, and He will help us if we sincerely ask for His help.

Tip: When you make dua, make sure to also work on your marriage by being kind, patient, and understanding with your spouse. Both dua and action go hand in hand.

Conclusion

Divorce is a difficult decision, and while Islam allows it under certain conditions, it is always better to try and save the marriage if possible. By turning to Allah, making sincere duas, and working together, many couples can overcome their challenges.

If you are going through a hard time in your marriage, don’t lose hope. Allah is always listening. Recite these duas with a sincere heart, and remember that Allah is the best of planners. Never underestimate the power of dua and the blessings that Allah can bring into your life.

May Allah protect all our marriages, guide us, and keep love and mercy in our hearts. Ameen.

You can visit our website – https://duaprayers.com/

Contact Details To Get in Touch with Abdullah Hussain

Email: duaprayersonline@gmail.com

Contact- +91–9855923779

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/duaprayers12/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/duaaprayers/

Chat with Us on WHATSAPP now.

[rehasaleh]

Divorce Lawyer in Qatar: A Comprehensive Guide

Khul' in Islamic law is the dissolution of a marriage at the request of the wife in exchange for returning the dowry given to her by the husband. Khul' differs from divorce in that the wife is the one requesting the separation, and she is willing to waive some of her financial rights in exchange for her freedom.

Why Do You Need a Khul' Lawyer in Qatar?

Legal Procedures: Khul' procedures require in-depth knowledge of Qatari laws related to personal status, and having a specialized lawyer ensures that the procedures are carried out correctly.

Legal Protection: A lawyer protects your legal rights and ensures you get the best possible outcome.

Negotiation: The lawyer can negotiate with your husband or his lawyer to reach a mutually satisfactory settlement.

Defending Your Rights: If you face any opposition from your husband, the lawyer will defend your rights in court.

Read More: Divorce lawyer in Qatar

Why is it Important to Choose an Experienced Khul' Lawyer?

Experience: An experienced lawyer has extensive knowledge of Khul' cases, increasing the chances of your case succeeding.

Reputation: A lawyer with a good reputation has good relationships with judges and other lawyers, which helps to expedite procedures.

Competence: A competent lawyer is able to provide sound legal advice and make the right decisions at every stage of the case.

Read More: Divorce lawyer in Qatar

How to Choose a Khul' Lawyer in Qatar?

Research and Recommendations: Ask friends, relatives, or online for recommendations of lawyers specializing in family law.

Free Consultations: Consult with several lawyers to get a more comprehensive opinion.

Experience and Specialization: Make sure the lawyer has experience in Khul' cases and specializes in family law.

Fees: Request detailed information about legal fees before contracting with a lawyer.

Read More: Law firms in Qatar

What are the Steps in a Khul' Case?

Preparation: Gather the necessary evidence to support your case, such as the marriage contract and witness statements.

Filing: File a Khul' request with the competent court.

Sessions: Attend court sessions and listen to the lawyers' pleadings.

Judgment: Issuance of a court judgment accepting or rejecting the Khul' request.

Read More: Legal Advisor Qatar

What are Your Rights as a Divorced Wife in Qatar?

Dowry: The right to recover the dowry paid by you or your father.

Maintenance: The right to temporary maintenance during the litigation period and permanent maintenance after the divorce judgment is issued.

Custody: The right to custody of the children if there are any.

Inheritance: The right to inheritance according to the provisions of Islamic law.

Important Tips:

Patience: Khul' cases can take a long time, so be patient.

Cooperation: Cooperating with your lawyer is essential to the success of your case.

Calmness: Avoid escalation and disputes with your husband, and maintain your calm throughout the case.

[placegrenette]

From the July 31st edition of Peter Leonard's Central Asia-focused Substack (which is good, you should subscribe):

A resident of Kostanay, a city in north Kazakhstan, submitted a complaint to the police about a popular singer who argued during an online stream that women spurning the hijab deserve to be beaten or killed. Saida Sisembayeva wrote in a Facebook post that she wanted the police to investigate if Ulangasyr Kami’s remarks constituted an actionable incitement to hatred and violence against women. Sisembayeva said that she filed the complaint to highlight the inaction of lawmakers speaking increasingly vocally about the need for upholding traditional values. It is unclear whether Kami, whose musical output consists heavily of upbeat synth-pop tunes, was speaking in earnest or if he was merely seeking to curry favour with a conservative crowd.

So I had to go hunting, but here's more, from Kazpress.kz (about which I know nothing):

A scandal has erupted in Kaznet over statements by Kazakh singer Ulangasyr Kami about the hijab. The artist believes that husbands kill their wives because they don’t have a headscarf, reports the NewTimes.kz news agency with reference to ZTB News. Kami said that he will insist that his wife wear a hijab. In addition, the singer emphasized that he does not consider a girl who does not agree with his conditions as his wife. “Even if a conscious girl’s head is cut off, she will not take off her hijab. I will also force my wife to wear a hijab. I don’t care. If the girl does not agree to this, then let her leave. If a woman behaves indecently, then it is better not to marry her. Husbands kill their wives because they do not wear a hijab,” the singer said. In turn, religious scholar Al-Farabi Bolatzhan considers such statements absurd. "His words justify murders - this is nonsense. Even if a woman bares her body without a headscarf, the Koran does not say that she should be tortured or killed. If he does not like such a wife, then he can simply divorce. Such statements make the singer an unspoken accomplice of rapists and murderers," Bolatzhan said. According to him, in Kazakhstan there are cases when girls are killed or beaten for reasons completely unrelated to their appearance. "The Koran says that if spouses cannot live together, then it is better to divorce. Islam does not approve of violence against women at all," he added.

I apologize for taking so long to bring y'all this. I saw the initial report, and wanted to have at least some context for it, and then got caught up in real-life things and didn't get back to Tumblr until this morning. (This is also why I haven't gotten back yet to the GAP reviews, or any of Ninety One's solo work; I felt like I had to get this out of the way first.)

Suffice to say the affectionate discussion of both Qami and his music, previously indulged in here, will not be continued.

(On a related note, if you're not already reading Alice Evans on how social and economic trends shape gender relations, including in Central Asia, you should be.)

[prenuplawyeruk]

Understanding Prenuptial Agreements in Islam: Are Prenups Allowed in Islam?

What is a Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement, commonly known as a prenup, is a legal contract entered into by a couple before they get married. This agreement outlines the division of assets and financial responsibilities in the event of a divorce. The primary purpose of a prenup is to protect individual assets and provide financial clarity and security for both parties.

Prenup Meaning in the Context of Islam

In the context of Islamic law, the prenup meaning goes beyond mere financial considerations. It is an agreement that aligns with the principles of fairness, mutual consent, and transparency, which are core values in Islamic teachings. A prenuptial agreement in Islam can cover various aspects, including financial rights, obligations, and any other conditions agreed upon by both parties, as long as they do not contradict Islamic principles.

Are Prenups Allowed in Islam?

One of the frequently asked questions is, "Are prenups allowed in Islam?" The answer is yes, prenuptial agreements are allowed in Islam, provided they comply with Islamic law (Sharia). Islam encourages clarity and mutual understanding in all agreements, including those made before marriage.

Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) supports the concept of contractual agreements, including prenuptial agreements, as long as they are fair and just. The agreement must not include any clauses that violate Islamic principles, such as conditions that are unjust or exploitative. The key is that both parties enter into the agreement willingly and with full knowledge of its terms.

Prenuptial Agreement Islam: Key Considerations

When drafting a prenuptial agreement in Islam, several key considerations must be taken into account:

Mutual Consent: Both parties must willingly agree to the terms of the prenuptial agreement. Coercion or pressure invalidates the agreement in the eyes of Islamic law.

Fairness and Justice: The agreement must be fair and just to both parties. It should not disproportionately favor one party over the other.

Compliance with Islamic Principles: The terms of the prenuptial agreement must comply with Sharia law. This includes respecting the rights and obligations of both husband and wife as outlined in Islamic teachings.

Transparency: Full transparency regarding assets, liabilities, and financial expectations is crucial. Both parties should have a clear understanding of each other's financial situation.

How to Create a Prenuptial Agreement in Islam

Creating a prenuptial agreement in Islam involves several steps:

Consultation with Islamic Scholars: It is advisable to consult with Islamic scholars or legal experts who are knowledgeable about both Islamic law and civil law. This ensures that the agreement adheres to both religious and legal requirements.

Open Discussion: The couple should engage in an open and honest discussion about their expectations, assets, and financial responsibilities. This helps in creating a transparent and fair agreement.

Legal Drafting: Once the terms are agreed upon, the agreement should be drafted legally, ensuring it is enforceable under both Islamic and civil law.

Review and Finalization: Both parties should review the agreement thoroughly and make any necessary adjustments before signing. It is also advisable to have the agreement reviewed by legal professionals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, prenuptial agreements are allowed in Islam as long as they adhere to Islamic principles of fairness, mutual consent, and transparency. The prenup meaning in Islam emphasizes the importance of protecting the rights and obligations of both parties while maintaining compliance with Sharia law. By following the proper steps and seeking guidance from knowledgeable experts, Muslim couples can create prenuptial agreements that provide financial security and clarity, strengthening their marital bond with a foundation of trust and mutual respect.

[islamicspecialistforloveback]

Dua To Get Your Ex Husband Back After Divorce

If you are reading this article right now, it means that you have experienced a separation or divorce from your partner and you want to know how to put the pieces back together. Though I know that you are experiencing a considerable amount of heartache right about now, I want you to know that you have come to the right place Today we will share an Islamic Dua To Get Your Ex Husband Back After…

[automatismoateo]

Muslim women actually think they are respected compared to western women via /r/atheism

Muslim women actually think they are respected compared to western women 💀 It’s hilarious to me how Muslim women say they are respected unlike other women😭 Can’t walk outside without Covering up head to toe Can be 1 of 4 wives Can’t refuse sex with their husband or else they get cursed If they are inslaved they can get r@ped and are literally forbidden from covering up Can’t travel more than one day without a mahram Can get beat and for anyone who says lightly there’s a Hadith where a women got beat so hard her hand turned green and the prophet said nothing Can almost never divorce her husband Are “deficient” in the mind Their testimony’s are worth half as much as a man’s Literally can’t show the shape of there body at all Can’t be leaders Are called impure on their period and their husbands are instructed to stay away Getting married to a man in Islam is literally compared to slavery in an authentic hadith because they can’t refuse their husbands and can’t even leave the house without them permission Yet western women who can do all these things and arent considered deficient or impure are the ones who aren’t respected 😭😭 Submitted February 23, 2024 at 03:55AM by RuinUnable2717 (From Reddit https://ift.tt/xMBHwNp)

[quran2002]

Replies to various comments and info about the state of the blog

I got various comments in my mini-posts about Quran fragments. I prefer to respond to them in bulk because this will save me the trouble of answering similar comments in the future. Also, too much needs to be said to put that in comments.

But first, some info and clarification. The Quran’s version I was reading so far was a Polish translation that had been published by Armoryka in 2013. As it turns out, its Chapter 2 appears to have a different numeration of the verses than https://quran.com/, for example. While the are some notable translation differences, even when comparing the Polish version on quran.com, the text seems overall the same.

Still, to avoid confusion with the numbers of the verses, and to stick with apparently more approved translation, I’ll continue reading of Quran from Quran.com. It’s a more handy way of reading it, as it allows you to check the original text and other translations.

Now, let’s respond to the comments. I’ll group them according to the subjects. It’s a long post that took long, but hey. To be wrong you don’t even need to write a sentence.

Women and marriage – Quran vs the Bible

@theologytalks

Interesting, however you have misinterpreted it here. 2:223 is in response to two things: 1. The prohibition of anal sex, and tilth is a euphemism for the vagina. 2. Rectifies pre Islamic superstition that certain sexual positions would cause deformities in the child. Thus it says “when or how you will”, since some superstitions said not to have sexual intercourse from behind or at certain times. Also 2:187 which you didn’t quote, has a similar tone as Corinthians! :)

I guess that Allah, among many of his carelessness, has combated the pre-Islamic superstitions by making a statement that sounds awfully like giving permission for rape within the marriage. Maybe, after allegedly getting his own words corrupted two times already, he shouldn’t omit such impotent context. But I digress.

2:187 addresses men to briefly tell them that their wives are their comfort and they are also for their wives. This sounds nice, but to interpret it to be as just a strong reaffirmation of equal rights in intimate relationships as 1 Cor 7:3-5, which is also backed by Genesis (2:24) and Jesus (Mark 10:7-8) stressing that man and women are meant to become one flesh? I mean, you can’t say that men and women become one flesh in Islam, due to its acceptance of polygamy.  

When I said that Islam in those verses is incompatible with Western civilization, I meant that it is incompatible with the idea of equal rights, as seen in its unequal divorce rights. The verses 2:226-2:229 about divorces demonstrate that women can be treated in an unequal throwaway manner. Regarding those, theologytalks also writes.

This is to make sure the woman isn’t pregnant. Also it says women have rights over the husband, but men have slight rights above them. This is in reference to many things, but some scholars mentioned religious rights like leading the prayer.  

He also has written more about 1 Timothy, but we’ll get to that when we discuss marriage and divorce in Christianity.

Regardless, those verses don’t give husbands “slight rights” above wives. It is husbands who have a stated right to divorce their wives if they just don’t want to have sex with them. It is husbands who have a stated right to take women back within those 3 months, which means that the ex-wives have no right to get a different husband against their ex-husband’s will. If the ex-wife finds a more preferable husband within those 3 months, but the ex-husband changes his mind, she sticks with the ex-husband.

Another thing that limits women’s rights is that husbands also lose their right to remarry directly after a third divorce, and in such a scenario they must wait until the ex-wife marries and divorces another man. This means that the ex-wives have no right to return to their ex-husbands in such situations, even if they want to, not unless some other man decides to marry them and THEN decides to have a divorce. And I’m very curious how the supposedly important in those verses pregnancies are being handled after a third divorce.  

Now, regarding Christianity, theologytalks points out

At. Paul once said in 1 Timothy “ Let a woman learn in silence with full submission. I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent.”

Well, that’s just what Paul says. Supposedly, because 1 Timothy is among attributed to him Epistles of questioned authorship. The Bible does not claim to be the direct Word of God like the Quran does, even though it does contain testimonies about the Word of God. Or, in the case of Epistles, their author’s thoughts and opinions. Because it’s not a single book, but an anthology of books that was decided on ages after Christ’s death.

Regardless, the quote goes against Paul’s quote in 1 Corinthians 11:5, where he talks about women prophesying, which cannot be done while being kept silent. There are also examples of female prophets in Acts and Judges. Not to mention, the reasoning in 1 Timothy is also bogus because it insists that Adam somehow wasn’t deceived, despite still consuming the Forbidden Fruit. The argument with creation order is also debatable because Adam after Eve’s creation is no longer the same Adam. After all, a part of him ended up in Eve, and only God knows about its importance (and the tradition says that the rib emphasizes equal dignity). Not to mention, he also goes against the idea of being saved by faith in Christ by tying salvation to childbirth.

The point is, unless you point out Jesus backing up anything 1 Timothy says like I can in the case of 1 Corinthians 7:3-5, it’s a non-obligating part of the Bible to discuss over. Which cannot be said about a single Quran’s verse.

And no, the Church’s statements on the subject do not count. We are not comparing religious organizations here.

Also, @muntassir adds

Chritsianism forbid divorce so...

I’m comparing more Holy Books than religions themselves. But yeah, it does, on equal rights, because it forbids it for both men and women. Excluding the situations of fornication. Also, Matthew 18:15-17 describes a procedure of cutting all ties with anybody who has sinned against you and remains remorseless about it. So, the Bible openly allows for justified divorce in a certain situation and you can interpret that it does also grant a procedure of a justified divorce in other situations where your partner is malicious towards you.

But home wrecking is strictly forbidden in the Bible, while the Quran apparently allows men to divorce women if they just don’t find them attractive anymore. Is there a verse later on that allows women to change their partners for more desirable ones? Anyway, for additional context about the importance of marriage, up until like 1850 90% of humanity was living in extreme poverty. Forming families allowed men and women to at least have somebody to rely on in their most likely harsh lives. But abandoning your partner to be alone in extreme poverty, just because you find somebody else more attractive, or because you got bored with them? Egoistical cruelty. Especially towards women, who were seen as less desirable when older and already married. Jesus even recognized that women’s situation was much more difficult, so he flat out told the Apostles to either get married or forget about having sex altogether in Matthew 19:1-12.

Even Western civilization doesn’t enable divorces at the drop of the hat and the desiring it spouse can end up paying for maintenance and alimony.

On marrying non-believers and living with them

Theologytalks says

 2 Corinthians 6:14. Also if Allah was scared of non Muslims dragging Muslims to the fire, why did He permit Muslims to marry Christians and Jews? Your argument doesn’t hold any water.

I can accept the translation that says the ban is only on marrying polytheists. My point still stands, unlike Christian God, Allah doesn’t believe in the ability of his believers to make their spouses and children holy. And it is your argument with 2 Cor 6:14 that does not hold any water.

Speaking of water, 1 Cor 7:12-14 is backed up by Christ in Mark 9:41. If those who gave a cup of water to Christians have a promised reward, it follows that those who supported them through marriage will be rewarded as well.

Instead of interpreting 'unequally yoked' as Paul changing his mind from 1 Cor 7:12-14, you can also interpret it as a warning from going too deep into other kinds of partnerships (like business ones) with pagans. In Paul's times, it was expected from officeholders and other esteemed members of Roman society to partake in their religious celebrations. For Christians, any relationship requiring them to practice paganism is a no. But marriage is fine if your spouse is kind towards you like a good Samaritan (the whole point of that parable was deconstructing Israelites’ tribalism and stressing the importance of personal ties).

Virgins or spouses?

Regarding the verse about pure virgins in the Heaven, theologytalks says:

Azwajun Mutahhara literally means pure /spouses. It’s not gender specific. It means purity from sin, disbelief, bodily filth, and yes sexual history as well.

If that’s the case, then sure, it’s fine. But this still brings a certain question, a similar one to the one that has been posed before Jesus.

Let’s assume that a woman was married to a man, but then he died. Then she remarried another man, but he died as well. This happened two more times, and the woman herself died alongside her fifth husband. She and all her husbands go to the Muslim Heaven. Whose purified spouse will the woman be? Let’s assume that all the men have died before they could marry anybody else. Do they share one wife in Heaven? Do most of them end up with no wives?

Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is not fitnah

Per 2:181 idolatry/tempting/heretical uprising/fitnah is worse than murder, and our friend theologytalks points out to Mark 3:28-29, which is about blasphemy against the Holy Spirit being pointed out as the unforgivable sin. There are two things about it, but the first one I have already spelled out above.

However you interpret fitnah, comparing it with the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, that came with a clear example of it, is a false equivalence. The context of Mark 3:28-29 (and Matthew 12:32) is that Jesus was performing miracles by casting out evil spirits, and the Pharisees have, knowingly, maliciously, and falsely called that a display of Satan’s power. They have done it because they wanted to undermine a secularist who had been telling them that no human should be an executor of God’s Law, but that’s beside the point.

I’m stressing out that it was both a knowing and malicious slander. The Pharisees knew well that they were lying. And not even against Christ Himself, as it is stated in Matthew 12:32. But they knew that God was clearly giving a sign of backing Jesus. But they didn’t want to listen to God if that meant giving up the status of being the ones interpreting and executing God’s Law. So, they have intentionally misinterpreted an Act of God as Satan’s doing.

It is a sin that is impossible to commit for a non-believer because a non-believer cannot do it knowingly and maliciously. A heretic can, if they are completely self-aware, but that’s also debatable (does it require an actual miracle to occur?), and it’s not fitting the context of 2:181.

Now, why isn’t this sin forgiven, unlike murder? I mean, if you are considering repeating exactly what the Pharisees have done, what the hell are you thinking you are about to do? Knowingly driving away people from God, who is displaying evidence of Himself? And towards what, sin and a potential damnation of their eternal souls? When you are fully aware that damnation is a far worse fate than being murdered? Of course, God won’t simply condemn other people for being fooled, Matthew 18:6-7 flat out says who God holds responsible for those who were driven towards sin.

Let’s not forget that the Gospels are strictly against the idea of punishing anyone in God’s name, and repeatably warn you that God will judge you as you do judge others. Quran is all about executing its religious law, so when it talks about something being worse than murder it allows its followers to treat it as worse than murder. And when the Bible states that God isn’t going to forgive a certain sin, it simply states what God Himself isn’t going to do.

On Imperialism, Part I – the unsupported account in Joshua

theologytalks says the following against my comments that Muhammad is suspicious for being imperialistic against all the past Prophets.

You neglect to acknowledge that God was more than an imperialist in Mosaic Law. Does Cherem ring a bell? Also, Joshua?

Well, Joshua’s conquests written in the OT are not backed up by archeological findings. I don’t recall Jesus mentioning him at all. Acts 7:45 mentions Joshua but is vague about what exactly has happened to pagans in Israel.

Again, the Bible is not the direct Word of God, like the Quran claims to be. I don’t disagree with Muhammed that it can contain alterations, God has made such a possibility apparent by stating His punishment for doing so in Revelation 22:18,19 and by commanding against such an idea in    Deuteronomy 4:2. But I believe that no possible alternations have prevented us from receiving what God wanted to tell us. Regardless, for me, a Christian, the Word of God is what Jesus has said. But we lack His writings and have only accounts about Him written around 66-110.

My reasoning for believing in Christ is the following: No historians deny the Apostoles believing in what they were saying. If so, they were either mad or actually had a religious experience. What goes against the idea of them being rambling madmen are Christ’s teachings being without fault and perfectly capable of satisfactorily explaining such things as the problem of evil, and so far I cannot find an alternative religion that does it better. If we assume there is a real religion, I know of no better candidate than Christianity.

As for OT, for me, it is a historically confirmed source of what Israelites believed during Jesus’ times because we know that OT books existed during His time. But we only know what Israel thought that was true, not exactly what was true. Parts of their beliefs have been confirmed by Jesus, and parts of them have been put into quite a different light by Jesus. For example, Luke 4:27 has Jesus saying that only Naaman was miraculously healed by Elisha, while pretty much saying that Elisha didn’t find Israelites worthy of such miracles. This adds quite a new meaning to that portion where Israel’s king has directed to Elisha a desperate and armed pagan general who was expecting to be healed after a long journey...

Anyway. Due to neither Jesus nor Archeology backing up Joshua’s conquests, I don’t have to believe that they have taken place as written in OT. As for Cherem/Herem, it was a prohibition from using wars to enrich oneself by looting, which we have recognized as a war crime as well. Anchan was stoned for taking for himself luxury items, gold, and silver.

On Imperialism, Part II – Not much after that, anyway

OT Israel was never meant to be expansionary. Even if we accept Joshua’s unsupported account of the violent initial conquest, it was a single instance. Imperialism requires constant expansion and subjugation of other territories. But Israel was meant to just sit on its promised land, don’t leave it, be God’s nation of priests, and stick to following God’s Law until God decides they are finally worthy of having Him living among them (Leviticus 26:11-12).

What is deemed by history as at least possible Biblical conflicts involving Israel, are a bunch of self-defense wars and inner conflicts after Israel has split as a nation. So, at least history proves that Israel wasn’t much expansional (maybe Solomon has expanded Israel’s borders, but he is the guy who has accepted a yearly amount of gold worth 666 talents). This does support the idea that Judaism wasn’t an imperialistic religion, but a state-centered conservative one that primarily focused on creating a perfect, God’s Laws following Holy Nation. 

And they have repeatedly failed at that through the OT. And the NT drives the point home by having them kill God’s Son, demonstrating that nothing has changed about the people’s ability to follow and execute God’s instructions ever since the times when said instructions were just “don’t eat that particular fruit”. Humans were given a chance to form a Holy Nation and have ended up demonstrating all the reasons against letting us do it. So, God has solved the problem by separating religion from power, even if those who came after still were stubbornly insisting that there shouldn’t be such a separation. But, we aren’t here to compare religions as organizations.

Christian/Biblical narrative, which is about giving up on the futile concept of religious laws and accepting ideas of secularism in earthy matters and volunteerism in religious ones, is a logical follow-up to the tale that Judaism recognizes. Even if Jews themselves deny that their story has gone in such a way.

Meanwhile, Islam insists that both OT and NT were corrupted, and insists on a bunch of radical retcons (oh boy, the things I’ve heard about their take on Jesus’ death – but we have to get to that). The overall story remains the same (Eden -> Abraham -> Egypt -> Israel -> etc), but then its god, instead of providing a solution for a specie that clearly cannot form a Holy Nation, appoints a warlord to try it all over again but more expansively. And then it still goes badly, because the newly appointed Holy Nation succumbs to infighting right after the appointed warlord dies.

Even Israel’s kings, who came with God’s warning of being a highly regrettable idea, could hold their nation united until after the third one had died. Me thinks the warmonger with an unsecured succession line is bogus with his claim of representing some kind of god, just like all the pagan kings of ancient fallen kingdoms before him.

Allah only cares about making demands

Regarding 2:253, theologytalks says:

No lol. He doesn’t say apostles are in conflict, but that people disbelieved once the Law changed. He is literally talking about Jews rejecting Jesus here, and says they were disbelievers. Hence the heavy reference to Jesus, the Holy Spirit etc. The Jews fought early Christian’s, bc they disbelieved in Christ. Before Christ came, they may have been sinners but were still considered believers. After rejection of Christ, their state changed within their own lifetime.

This doesn’t change the meaning much. Instead of Allah not bothering to prevent the infighting among the Apostles/Christians, Allah didn’t bother to prevent the infighting among Jews and Christians. And as we know, neither he did prevent the infighting among Muslims after Muhammed.

My point is that the Quran denies the existence of God who has sent His Son (who is also believed to be God Himself) to die for the sins of the entire mankind He cares about (oh boy, oh boy, the things I’ve heard about their take on Jesus’ death). Instead, it proposes a god who could have prevented people from being wrong about him without any bloodshed, but he only has bothered to dispatch a warlord prophet from a different part of the world. And then he didn’t bother about said warlord’s family and followers succumbing to infighting.

Yet if Allah had willed, they would not have fought one another. But Allah does what He wills.

Biblical God cares, Quran’s god simply does not. And it is the Quran’s god who makes following his religion the must condition to not be condemned (Quran.com Saheeh International English translation of a rather tolerant verse 2:62 has a footnote that says 3:85 is going to amend it by insisting that those living after Muhammed must accept Islam, even if they are Jews/Christians/Sabians). Biblical God will grant you life eternal for just not breaking the common sense Commandments from IV to VIII (Matthew 19:16-20), and His punishments are stated to be more lenient towards non-believers/not-knowing God’s Law (Luke 12:47-48). Following Christianity is required to receive Grace and forgiveness of your already committed sins (Romans 3:20-24) and to attain Sainthood/riches in Heaven (Matthew 19:27-30). Unlike Allah, God won’t punish you just for not being a follower of His religion.

***

Well, there are some other comments. But this post has six pages in Word already, so maybe some other time I’ll reply to them. I still need to finally start chapter 3 of the Quran.

Does the change of translation change my outlook on the Quran? Not much. Still a twisted version of Christianity created by a clearly false prophet. Would not follow such religion freely.

[meetdheeraj]

Those who support Uniform Civil Code Bill, can someone help me with what's law or procedure to seek or secure divorce in Hindu religion?

Thanks to media and current govt's relentless focus and attack on Muslims, we know there are clear laid out terms and procedures for divorce in Islam. In fact, in Islam women seeking divorce do not even require husband's permission to annul a marriage. Plus there's provision about what she'll get etc etc. I'm not going into what happens in real practical terms but just what's prescribed in books.

Someone please help.

Rest, my current opinions are for diverse laws since India is made of diverse people. And slowly one law at a time move towards more progressive laws; towards laws that expand all our freedoms, provide citizens with more powers against state, towards equal and fare share in inheritance, so on and so forth.

If there are things another country does better then let's follow that country in that aspect. For example, our neighbor Pakistan has criminalised marital rape. But we in India refuse to even classify it as rape. So when we are saying "uniform", from where have we picked these "uniform" laws? For instance, Goa has, by far that I've read, best and most progressive inheritance law. If India tomorrow brings "uniform" law, would it be better than what we have in Goa? If not, should Goa regress for "uniformity" sake or can Goa keep its more modern law? And if it keeps, how can you call your law as "uniform"?