#HIGH COURT

[yusominso]

I hate you in depths of my shrinking bones under it crawls for blood bounding it in a unit, I hate every aspect of you until I end up longing for you 

[jerseydeanne]

article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10531291/How-Prince-Harry-tried-legal-fight-bodyguards-secret.html

[stpeterslaw]

St. Peters Law Academy provides the best coaching for CLAT - UG, DU LLB, CLAT PG, and Judiciary in both Hindi and English Medium. We also keep bringing various Crash Courses for upcoming exams specifically to brush up the preparation. We have a world-class portal to facilitate real-time exam analysis with the latest technologies to help you understand your shortcomings. We provide Test-Series of all the law exams. & Admission will be closing soon, Hurry up only a few seats are left. For registration and Demo class, call mentioned numbers 099908 98327, and 099908 98348. Our team is waiting for your reply.

[darkxlya]

Jude and Cardan are the embodiment of

Jude: do you like me?

Cardan: we're literally married

Jude: Yes, but did you marry me as a friend or, like, a wife? Unclear.

&

Cardan: you had a crush on me, that's embarrassing

Jude: we're married

Cardan: still

And here's proof:

Queen of Nothing, Chapter 25 *spoilers*

[bkenber]

Rachel Weisz on Playing Hester Collyer in 'The Deep Blue Sea'

Rachel Weisz on Playing Hester Collyer in ‘The Deep Blue Sea’

WRITER’S NOTE: As the opening sentence hints at, this article was written in 2012. The 2012 New York Film Critics Circle Awards were recently given out, and one of the big winners was Rachel Weisz who won the Best Actress Award for her performance in “The Deep Blue Sea.” In the film she portrays Hester Collyer, the wife of a High Court judge who ends up having a passionate affair with Royal Air…

[advamitsuden]

Top 25 Most Trusted Lawyers in Delhi India 2023

Advocate Amit Suden is one of India’s foremost senior corporate immigration attorneys with 25+ years of experience as one of India’s senior corporate mobility lawyers, Mr. Amit is recognized as an experienced authority on expatriate mobility matters.

"Top 25 Most Trusted Lawyers in Delhi India 2023"

ADVOCATE AMIT SUDEN FIRM SPECIALISING IN EXCELLENT TAILOR-MADE LEGAL SOLUTIONS

Demand for legal services in India is growing exponentially with large infrastructure projects expected to be launched by the Government to combat the economic slowdown with the increasing number of companies in the nation; many Indian companies engaging in cross-border transactions; increasing levels of legal awareness, regulation & compliance. One law firm that has been able to seize these opportunities and add value to its clientele is New Delhi, headquartered Riar Global LLP.

Founded in 2010, Riar Global carries a legacy of quality and integrity and caters to a wide range of legal requirements of a diverse clientele. The firm continuously helps clients get through the maze of complex legislation in a world where globalisation and technology are constantly changing. It is concentrated on providing clients with counsel that would guarantee the most excellent feasible resolution without compromise.

[nextpactlaw]

[larisarealtech97]

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has quashed the Enforcement Case Information Report registered by the Enforcement Directorate against Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. and several of its employees and ordered that no further violent action be taken against Indiabulls and its employees in a case in which the Bombay High Court has already revoke the FIR.

  On Monday, the High Court (HC), in an order passed, kept aside the (LOC) issued against these employees and said there should be no query, takeover or summons arising out of the (ECIR) Enforcement Case Information Report.

  After many challenges to specific provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) by the accused, the high court (HC) bench of Justices Anish Dayal and Mukta Gupta already said the Supreme Court had decided it in an earlier judgement.

Referring to the Supreme Court judgement, the high court said that the court finds no practical reason for the said Enforcement Case Information Report to be assisted against them, without any proper evidence of a predicate offence or an FIR against Indiabulls and its employees, which is in existing or is legally alive.

[seachranaidhe]

Jamie Bryson: Government's clever legal footwork over the NI Protocol will not hoodwink the PUL.

Jamie Bryson: Government’s clever legal footwork over the NI Protocol will not hoodwink the PUL.

http://seachranaidhe-irishandproud.blogspot.com/2022/09/jamie-bryson-governments-clever-legal.html

[thepartsyoullneversee]

Recently I was part of a jury at the supreme high court and we convicted a rapist. As a woman, and even more so as a survivor who's not had the courage to report what happened to me, I don't think I'll ever feel such a sense of overwhelming relief, joy or empowerment as I did that day as I read out our guilty verdict to the judge.

[spiritsandstaircases]

𝕳𝖎𝖌𝖍 𝕮𝖔𝖚𝖗𝖙

The High Court is the essence of 𝕺𝖗𝖉𝖊𝖗 and exists to serve as the light to 𝕯𝖎𝖘𝖈𝖔𝖗𝖉 𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝖂𝖆𝖗. While many assumed it was hidden away to avoid the lingering gazes of mortal eyes, its secrets run much deeper and conceal a shadowy past. A fey may only touch the willowy wisps of the veil with permission from its heir, something which comes to far fewer than have marked ask.

© IMAGES: Emmanuelle Brisson

[jerseydeanne]

[travelnew]

Gateway of India

Gateway of India, Apollo Bunder

Leaves or what is this tree made up of!?

Heritage building

BSE, Kala Ghoda and Rhythm house from Jahangir Art Gallery

Curvaceous

Rajabai Tower & HIgh Court.

18/02/2022: A walk to soak in the rich heritage architecture of Mumbai. South Mumbai has nice vibes to it. Your eyes are towards the sky, scanning for the beautiful buildings that bask in the golden rays of the evening Sun.

[coochiequeens]

I am coming out of semi-retirement from writing about sex and gender to write this, because it’s about women in prison, a group that desperately need more attention from people interested in politics and policy.

The High Court has been considering the question of transgender women (i.e. people who were born male) in the female prison estate. That’s after a legal action was brought by a woman in a female jail who says she was sexually assaulted by a trans prisoner. The prison service hasn’t denied that this assault took place.

The claimant, was imprisoned between October 2016 and June 2020, argued that prison service policy in England and Wales is unlawful because it exposes women in the female estate to the increased risk of sexual assault by transwomen prisoners, a risk that is not similarly posed to male prisoners in the male estate.

That prison service policy, in essence, says that at least some transwomen offenders should be allowed to serve their sentence in the female estate if they wish. The claim failed and the court ruled that prison policy is lawful. But the ruling remains hugely significant and deserves close reading.

For context, the court heard that a significant number of transwomen in jail are there for sexual offences. In March/April 2019, there were 163 transgender prisoners, of whom 81 had been convicted of one or more sexual offences. 129 of those prisoners were allocated to the male estate, 34 to the female estate.

There remains debate about the statistics here, and the Ministry of Justice is reviewing its data collection methods. But Lord Justice Holroyde reached this conclusion:

I can accept, at any rate for present purposes, that the unconditional introduction of a transgender woman into the general population of a women's prison carries a statistically greater risk of sexual assault upon non-transgender prisoners than would be the case if a non-transgender woman were introduced.

The judge also found that female prisons, who are disproportionately likely to have been victims of sexual assault, may be frankly terrified of being confined with a male-bodied sex offender:

Many people may think it incongruous and inappropriate that a prisoner of masculine physique and with male genitalia should be accommodated in a female prison in any circumstances. More importantly for the Claimant's case, I readily accept that a substantial proportion of women prisoners have been the victims of sexual assaults and/or domestic violence.

I also readily accept the proposition ... that some, and perhaps many, women prisoners may suffer fear and acute anxiety if required to share prison accommodation and facilities with a transgender women who has male genitalia, and that their fear and anxiety may be increased if that transgender woman has been convicted of sexual or violent offences against women.

However, the court found that prison service policy remains lawful, because that policy must reflect not just the interests of female prisoners but also the interests of transwomen prisoners:

the subjective concerns of women prisoners are not the only concerns which the Defendant [the Justice Secretary] had to consider in developing the policies: he also had to take into account the rights of transgender women in the prison system.

And allowing some transwomen prisoners to serve their time in the female estate alongside women prisoners is necessary under the law (especially the Equality Act 2010), the court found. Because the prison service has checks and safeguards in place to ‘manage’ the risks potentially posed by transwomen prisoners, it is acceptable under the law to expose women prisoners to those risks. The judge concludes:the policies permit, and indeed require, the necessary balancing of competing rights. The concerns of the Claimant are of course understandable, but are not the only concerns which the Defendant had to consider.

The debate about sex and gender is complicated and often fraught, not least when it reaches the courts. But there are two, fairly simple, points that I think everyone should draw from that court ruling.The first is that the High Court has confirmed that accommodating the interests of transwomen and women leads, in some circumstances, to 'competing rights'. Sometimes, giving something to transwomen means taking something away from women. There is nothing transphobic or otherwise hateful about saying so. It is, as the court ruling shows, a simple statement of fact.

That leads to the second point. In this case, the state has given to some transwomen offenders the right to be imprisoned in the female prison estate. That decision, made to accommodate the interests of those transwomen, comes at the expense of women in the female estate. The court found that those women are exposed to an increased risk of sexual assault and to anxiety and fear of such sexual assault.

The court further found that, under the law as it stands, it is legal for ministers to implement a policy that exposes women prisoners to that increased risk and to 'understandable' fear, because – assuming proper mitigation is in place – that risk and that fear are an acceptable price to pay to accommodate the interests of transwomen prisoners.I’m not going to bother saying what I think of this situation, because I suspect I don’t need to. I also note that the Ministry of Justice is already reviewing the policy in question, so I think this won’t be the last word on the matter.

Instead, I will conclude by saying that the High Court ruling has confirmed beyond doubt something that a great many women have been trying to say for several years, often meeting with aggressive rejection and accusations of bigotry. The court confirmed that in some circumstances, accommodating the interests of male-born transwomen means imposing costs and burdens on women.And that raises a question that society as a whole still needs to answer: why should women pay and suffer to serve the interests of people who were born male?

WRITTEN BYJames Kirkup

James Kirkup is director of the Social Market Foundation and a former political editor of the Scotsman and the Daily Telegraph.

[doonitedin]

Rakesh Asthana made Delhi Police chief in ‘public interest’, Centre tells HC

Rakesh Asthana made Delhi Police chief in ‘public interest’, Centre tells HC

The appointment of Gujarat-cadre IPS officer Rakesh Asthana was contested for being illegal on multiple grounds The Central government has informed the Delhi High Court that the appointment of Gujarat cadre IPS officer Rakesh Asthana as Delhi Police Commissioner was done in “public interest”, taking into account the Capital’s policing issues, which not only had national security, but also…

[gujjukathiyawadi]

ગાયને રાષ્ટ્રીય પશુ જાહેર કરો:અલાહાબાદ હાઇકોર્ટે કહ્યું- ગૌરક્ષાને કોઈપણ ધર્મ સાથે જોડવાની જરૂર નથી, ગાય આ દેશની સંસ્કૃતિ છે