#High Court

[belamercado]

In Court of Justice, both the parties know the truth, it is the Judge, who is on trial.

Justice J R Midha of Delhi High Court in his farewell speech.

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

Now new court documents seen by The Times show that Sir Peter has refused Harry permission to appeal and also that the Home Office has been "penalised" for delaying the release of certain information - dubbed "crucial" by Harry's team - about the workings of Ravec - the committee that arranges security for members of the Royal Family and other VIPs.

Prince Harry was given a 10 percent discount on his legal fees in his High Court battle against the Home Office over his UK security after the Government was punished for delaying the provision of key documents, it has been reported.

The Duke of Sussex took legal action against the Home Office over the February 2020 decision that he should receive a different degree of protection when he returned to the UK after he quit his royal duties.

He lost the case back in February with High Court judge Sir Peter Lane finding that "there has not been any unlawfulness in reaching the decision" to revise his security, adding: "Any departure from the policy was justified. The decision was not irrational. The decision was not marred by procedural unfairness."

According to the newspaper, the Home Office failed to mention three categories of people for whom Ravec provides state protection when it should have legally done so.

The three categories are role-based individuals - like royals - other VIPs and those who need occasional support.

This meant the prince's legal team had not been made aware of the "other VIP" category, which, according to them, was crucial to his claim.

Harry's team initially sought "a reduction of 50-60 percent because of the way in which the documents and information were disclosed" by the Home Office.

Sir Lane said that while the Home Office had not acted in bad faith, "the defendant's breaches are, in all the circumstances, sanctionable".

[stark-reading-mad]

[workersolidarity]

🇬🇧 🚨

UNITED KINGDOM HIGH COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF JULIAN ASSANGE, APPEALS MAY BEGIN

The High Court of the United Kingdom in British capital of London, ruled today in favor of Julian Assange, deciding the WikiLeaks founder will have an opportunity to appeal his extradition to the United States in British courts.

The High Court also gave the United States government three weeks the give guarantees that Julian Aplssange will be able to defend himself by invoking his rights under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The Court also seeks assurances that Mr. Assange will not face the death penalty nor that he will be disadvantage by his status as an Australian citizen, all of which the U.S. has so far refused to provide the Court.

If these assurances are not met, Assange will be granted permission to appeal and a hearing will take place.

Had the Court ruled against Assange, all his appeals would have been exhausted and his extradition to the United States would have been granted immediately.

Mr. Assange faces charges in the United States under the Espionage Act, an antiquated and draconian law never before used in cases involving journalists.

A last ditch effort could also have been made to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights, however, following Brexit, it is unclear what, if anything, a European Court ruling against the extradition .could have done to influence the British decision.

#source

@WorkerSolidarityNews

[megayogiposts]

Violation of Court Orders in UP Recruitment Drive

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2025/0007902 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 18/01/2025 Received By Ministry/Department Prime Minister’s Office Grievance Description Violation of court order by mission director, National Health Mission Pinky Jowel.Without considering the representation of petitioners, mission director issued…

[vinodkaushikadvocate]

[talesofyonder]

1,000 years ago, the High King was deposed by the Seelie and Unseelie High Courts. At the end of the war, he vanished. Most believe he was killed by his enemies, but others believe he escaped, and is simply hiding biding his time. Either way, most hold the secret belief he will one day return, for better or worse.

For now, his old palace sits in ruins, awaiting the day its old master returns

[libraryofbaxobab]

June 26, 2023:

I sorta liked the mystery / courtly intrigue, but that's overshadowed by how much I vehemently disapprove of the romance. I'm not sure it was worth it and I spent a large portion of the book annoyed.

4.5/10

#WhatsKenyaReading

[mishrasatty7]

Appointment Case Advice HighCourt Chandigarh

Note: This story has not been edited by LegalSeva and is generated from a news syndicate feed.HC dismisses plea challenging IIM Rohtak director’s appointmentCourt said petitioners who filed the plea appeared to be the “front faces” of two employees, whose services were terminated by Dheeraj SharmaCHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court has dismissed a petition challenging 2017 appointment…

[worldreporttv24]

Mechanism for living wills underway, state tells HC

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Thursday disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by gynaecologist Dr Nikhil Datar, seeking directions to implement a suitable mechanism for passive euthanasia and for speedy retrieval of living wills years after they had been made. (Shutterstock) A living will, a legal document providing instructions for medical care in cases of incapacitation, was…

[stark-reading-mad]

It's me and my little notebook against the edifice of legal procedure

[megayogiposts]

Grievance Against NHM UP: High Court Order Violated

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2025/0008838Grievance Concerns ToName Of ComplainantYogi M. P. SinghDate of Receipt20/01/2025Received By Ministry/DepartmentPrime Minister’s OfficeGrievance DescriptionMost respected Sir following notification issued by the mission director national health mission UP is ultra vires to the order passed by the high court of judicature at Allahabad…

[vinodkaushikadvocate]