#Christian Greco

[storiearcheostorie]

Museo Egizio di Torino: nuovo allestimento per le grandiose statue di dei e faraoni della Galleria dei Re

Museo Egizio di Torino: nuovo allestimento per le grandiose statue di dei e faraoni della Galleria dei Re

Redazione Le magnifiche statue di dei e faraoni della Galleria dei Re del Museo Egizio di Torino saranno protagoniste, a partire dal 23 aprile, di un nuovo allestimento temporaneo nell’atrio e sotto le arcate del Museo Egizio e dell’Accademia delle Scienze, dal titolo “Verso la nuova Galleria dei Re”. L’esposizione, frutto della collaborazione tra le due istituzioni, offrirà fino a ottobre ai…

[ginogirolimoni]

Il ministro Sangiuliano vuole rimuovere dal suo posto il direttore del Museo Egizio di Torino Christian Greco, al suo posto è indeciso se nominare Galileo Galilei o Cristoforo Colombo.

C'è una petizione per impedirlo: firmala!

[quietgirlfromthehills]

Lega vs Christian Greco in pochissime parole:

[lionofchaeronea]

St. Veronica with the Holy Face, El Greco, ca. 1580

[tygerland]

El Greco The Depredation. 1579. Oil on canvas: 285 × 173 cm (112 × 68 in).

[artandthebible]

Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple

Artist: Artist: El Greco (Greek, 1541 – 614)

Genre: Religious Art

Date: 1600

Medium: Oil on Canvas

Collection: Frick Collection, New York City

Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple is a 1595-1600 Christian art painting by El Greco, now in the Frick Collection. It depicts the Cleansing of the Temple, an event in the Life of Christ.

Matthew 21:12-13 New International Version (NIV)

'''Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. “It is written,” he said to them, “ ‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’”

[loud-whistling-yes]

This is going to sound like the world's most brain-rotted thought but passerine by the oh hellos is martlet coded and canary in a coal mine by the crane wives is clover coded

[christliche-kunstwerke]

Christus, der die Blinden heilt, um 1570 von El Greco (1570, oil on canvas)

[gemsofgreece]

Man of God: A review

After three years since its release (time flies 😳) I decided to finally watch Man of God and see for myself what all the praise and all the criticism were about. For those who don’t know, Man of God is a Greek - Russian movie about the life of Saint Nektarios of Aegina island.

The information around the reception of the movie has been jarring with most believers speaking of a rare masterpiece while most atheists spoke of one of the most terrible movies full of propaganda they had ever seen etc

Much to my dismay, this was another reminder that in this country atheists / agnostics are not any more reliable than fiercely religious people.

The truth of course is somewhere in between. The film is decent, in no way a masterpiece and in no way the worst movie you will ever see. It can actually keep your attention well until the end. But you must KNOW why you watch it. Atheists complaining for the money they wasted on it, on a movie that was very obviously about a man supposed to have reached sainthood and be venerated as such, I am sorry but it is their problem if they could not figure out they would not be interested in the content.

I could even recommend watching this movie but only if you know why you watch it and only after I will briefly give you its pros and cons.

Pros:

The acting is pretty good. Some people criticised it, however the problem they saw and perhaps misinterpreted as bad acting was different and I will mention it promptly. In any case, the acting is good, the casting is mostly good, Ares Servetalis is generally well chosen as the main character. I also enjoyed Loulis, Karabeti and a very theatrical Stankoglou in their short roles. Mickey Rourke is the international star who makes a very short cameo here and he is also good.

This film is particularly good for the images and insight into Christian Orthodoxy it provides. There is complete accuracy regarding the vestments, the way both a solemn and true but also a deceitful priest typically act, the way the Synod, Ecclesiastical schools, the monasteries operate and so on. From this perspective, it was interesting to watch.

The make up is great. Saint Nektarios starts as a man in his early 40s and we see all the stages as he ages and his health deteriorates significantly very accurately. This is actually where Servetalis’ acting shines the most, too.

The cinematography is nice, it has pretty imagery from rural Greece and a few nice settings in religious buildings. It is nowhere near the level of views Greece can naturally and even religiously offer but it was overall aesthetically pleasing.

Despite its several flaws, the film was able to move me and cause me (suitable) discomfort in certain parts.

Cons:

This movie would be unanimously considered a lot better, had it not been for the frankly crazy idea to be filmed in English. So, you have a Greek movie with Greek actors playing Greek characters in a Greek setting in 19th-20th century Greece speaking English to each other. Even worse is the choice to sprinkle with a little Greek here and there, for example priests speak in English but chant in Greek, Nektarios visits a Greek woman and speaks to her in English but then immediately afterwards speaks to the maid in Greek (???what the hell), a drunken man sings in Greek and then addresses the priest in English. It’s frankly lunatic and I can’t believe how everyone - director, producers, screenwriters, actors - thought that just because the movie would have an international release, this was a justifiable decision.

Like I said, some people accused the movie of bad acting. Here’s the problem: the actors tried their best and mostly were very good, however they gave so much emphasis on the struggle to pronounce English as well as possible (it is a known fact that Greek speakers struggle with the English accents), that this was making their dialogues slow and very cautious which was obviously making dialogue heavy scenes seem very unnatural. It does not help at all that the protagonist has clearly one of the weakest English accents in the cast. Servetalis is furthermore naturally very soft spoken but while it is beautiful in Greek, in his weak English it just sounds weird. Heads up for Loulis though - his English was freaking amazing in my humble opinion. And in general, if you knew how much Greek speakers often struggle with English accents, you’d understand that most of the actors really outdid themselves. Hence, the acting is good.

The pacing and the script of the movie are just bad. The movie starts without giving the main character’s background at all and without giving any insight into how the animosity against him was developed amongst the other bishops of Alexandria. Then it’s mostly dialogue heavy and it’s through the dialogues that we explore the main character and so many people may feel they remain emotionally detached from him. In fact, Servetalis also interprets the character in a somewhat detached, suppressed, “hovering above the ground” way and although I totally understand this approach, it is not assisted with that poor script and the out of place English to make the audience feel connected to him more. The English script is also very unnatural, most of the responses are like “Yes, I will” and “No, I do not” as if we are back to English A1 Class.

I already said the settings were okay, however there was room for improvement. I hoped a Russian director would not follow the same typical preference of Greek directors for narrow frames and a lot of close ups but apparently not. Neither the rich Church funding this nor even Russia could help with the budget and finally get a Greek movie with big sets and wide camera shots?! lol 🥲 I will open a champagne the day we get such a movie.

There are some goofs, i.e Nektarios ages so much and everyone else remains in the same age XD

Regarding the Propaganda claim:

I suppose this came only by biased atheists because, no, there is actually no propaganda in the film. It is a Christian movie made for Christian and Christian-tolerant audiences, who either accept or are open to the established belief that Nektarios had performed miracles in his lifetime. And in fact, the reference to his miracles is surprisingly fleeting for a movie that is funded by the Church. It’s just one small scene and then one very short mention and that’s all. There is also nothing else that would make this movie eligible for propaganda accusations - Nektarios is firm in his faith of course and especially in his Jesus-like selflessness, other people around him express doubt or prefer pure reason. Some are good people and question religion. Some are evil people and question religion. But most importantly, many are priests and are straightforwardly portrayed as foul deceivers, traitors, liars etc. Not only do I not see propaganda in this but I was personally impressed by the Church’s admission of what kind of people often infest it (of course it helps that all these people lived 1-2 centuries ago lol). Of course, the movie does accept that he performed miracles and thus was holy. But it is a Christian movie about an established venerated Christian saint… right? If for example I watched a movie made about a religious figure by the believers of this - any - religion, should I not expect that the figure would be presented as admirable or even holy? I hope you get my point. If you know what you are watching and why you are watching it, there is no case you will find anything problematic in it.

Anyway, these were my thoughts regarding the movie. The general score it gets in IMDb, produced as the median from the extremely high and low ratings of believers and atheists respectively, is fairly accurate and what I feel would be my personal score as well: 7.

So if you are a Christian or a Christian Orthodox and considered watching this (all these three years before I came around to watch it 😅), sure go ahead!

Saint Nektarios of Aegina island

Scene from the movie

[hanssloane]

Christ blessing, The Saviour of The World

El Greco

National Galleries of Scotland

[divinebeloved]

Christ Taking Leave of His Mother, El Greco (1595)

I saw this painting in a museum, and I had to sit for a while to take in their faces. Christ and Mary give each other looks of the deepest knowing and tenderest love. They do not cling, nor do they hide their sorrow. We all ultimately go to that for which we are made: suffering, grief, hope, and love.

[storiearcheostorie]

Gli Egizi e i doni del Nilo: a Forte dei Marmi un viaggio nel tempo in 24 reperti

MOSTRE | Gli Egizi e i doni del Nilo: a Forte dei Marmi un viaggio nel tempo in 24 reperti L’esposizione, in collaborazione con il Museo Egizio di Torino, resterà aperta nel Forte di Leopoldo fino al 2 febbraio 2025.

Redazione L’antico Egitto approda a Forte dei Marmi con una mostra del Museo Egizio di Torino dal titolo “Gli Egizi e i doni del Nilo”, curata da Paolo Marini, curatore e coordinatore scientifico delle mostre itineranti del Museo. Promossa dalla Fondazione Villa Bertelli e dal Comune di Forte dei Marmi, l’esposizione è stata inaugurata al Forte di Leopoldo il primo agosto, dal sindaco di Forte…

[wisdomfish]

Christians Are Intolerant

It is well-known that in the Greco-Roman world there was a pantheon of gods. Every group had its own deities, and they were easily and naturally placed alongside other deities. For the most part, no one objected to the existence of other gods. It was a polytheistic world.

Of course, the earliest Christians were as monotheistic as their Jewish predecessors and quite unwilling to play along with the standard religious practices of Greco-Roman culture. For Roman rulers trying to keep the peace, Christian intolerance of other gods was a perennial frustration.

Pliny the Younger, Roman governor of Bythinia (writing c.111-113), expressed his frustration over the fact that Christians would not “invoke the gods.” In a letter to emperor Trajan, he lamented their “stubborness and unyielding obstinancy.” In other words, he was angry over their intolerance.

Why was Pliny so bothered? Because the influence of the Christians had caused the pagan temples to be “deserted” and thus “very few purchasers could be found” for the sacrificial animals.

In other words, they were losing money.

To fix the problem, Pliny decided to force Christians to worship the pagan gods and curse Christ, and if they refused they were put to death

~ Michael J. Kruger

[theinwardlight]

Quote from Richard Rolle (1300-1349), The Fire of Love 

Painting: Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple, by El Greco, 1568

[into-the-very-fires-of-mordor]

GUYS GUESS WHAT

I'M CHANGING MY MAJOR TO CLASSICS!

I'M GOING TO BE DOUBLE MAJORING IN ENGLISH AND CLASSICS!

I AM SO FREAKIN' EXCITED I CAN'T EVEN!!!!!

[rosario-aurelius]

Lamb of God: Horus, Christ, and the Labarum

The development of the Sun-god archetype in Early Christianity was shaped by the preceding language and symbolism of Egyptian and Greco-Roman religions. When Constantine first beheld the vision of the labarum, the prevailing patterns of syncretism had already provided a shape and direction for the form that the early Christian Sun-god would take. It was represented by the Greek symbol of Chi-Rho.…