#AI-generated content in literature

[otherworldlyinfo]

How To Write a Book with AI

Determine the Genre and ConceptCreate a Chapter OutlineRequest a Chapter and Set the ToneContinue to TweakFinish and Publish Have you ever wondered how to write a book with AI? Writing a book with the help of AI can be an exciting and innovative approach to creative writing. While AI can generate ideas, provide suggestions, and even assist in writing, it’s important to note that the creative…

[jstor]

I saw something about generative AI on JSTOR. Can you confirm whether you really are implementing it and explain why? I’m pretty sure most of your userbase hates AI.

A generative AI/machine learning research tool on JSTOR is currently in beta, meaning that it's not fully integrated into the platform. This is an opportunity to determine how this technology may be helpful in parsing through dense academic texts to make them more accessible and gauge their relevancy.

To JSTOR, this is primarily a learning experience. We're looking at how beta users are engaging with the tool and the results that the tool is producing to get a sense of its place in academia.

In order to understand what we're doing a bit more, it may help to take a look at what the tool actually does. From a recent blog post:

Content evaluation

Problem: Traditionally, researchers rely on metadata, abstracts, and the first few pages of an article to evaluate its relevance to their work. In humanities and social sciences scholarship, which makes up the majority of JSTOR’s content, many items lack abstracts, meaning scholars in these areas (who in turn are our core cohort of users) have one less option for efficient evaluation. 

When using a traditional keyword search in a scholarly database, a query might return thousands of articles that a user needs significant time and considerable skill to wade through, simply to ascertain which might in fact be relevant to what they’re looking for, before beginning their search in earnest.

Solution: We’ve introduced two capabilities to help make evaluation more efficient, with the aim of opening the researcher’s time for deeper reading and analysis:

Summarize, which appears in the tool interface as “What is this text about,” provides users with concise descriptions of key document points. On the back-end, we’ve optimized the Large Language Model (LLM) prompt for a concise but thorough response, taking on the task of prompt engineering for the user by providing advanced direction to:

Extract the background, purpose, and motivations of the text provided.

Capture the intent of the author without drawing conclusions.

Limit the response to a short paragraph to provide the most important ideas presented in the text.

Search term context is automatically generated as soon as a user opens a text from search results, and provides information on how that text relates to the search terms the user has used. Whereas the summary allows the user to quickly assess what the item is about, this feature takes evaluation to the next level by automatically telling the user how the item is related to their search query, streamlining the evaluation process.

Discovering new paths for exploration

Problem: Once a researcher has discovered content of value to their work, it’s not always easy to know where to go from there. While JSTOR provides some resources, including a “Cited by” list as well as related texts and images, these pathways are limited in scope and not available for all texts. Especially for novice researchers, or those just getting started on a new project or exploring a novel area of literature, it can be needlessly difficult and frustrating to gain traction. 

Solution: Two capabilities make further exploration less cumbersome, paving a smoother path for researchers to follow a line of inquiry:

Recommended topics are designed to assist users, particularly those who may be less familiar with certain concepts, by helping them identify additional search terms or refine and narrow their existing searches. This feature generates a list of up to 10 potential related search queries based on the document’s content. Researchers can simply click to run these searches.

Related content empowers users in two significant ways. First, it aids in quickly assessing the relevance of the current item by presenting a list of up to 10 conceptually similar items on JSTOR. This allows users to gauge the document’s helpfulness based on its relation to other relevant content. Second, this feature provides a pathway to more content, especially materials that may not have surfaced in the initial search. By generating a list of related items, complete with metadata and direct links, users can extend their research journey, uncovering additional sources that align with their interests and questions.

Supporting comprehension

Problem: You think you have found something that could be helpful for your work. It’s time to settle in and read the full document… working through the details, making sure they make sense, figuring out how they fit into your thesis, etc. This all takes time and can be tedious, especially when working through many items. 

Solution: To help ensure that users find high quality items, the tool incorporates a conversational element that allows users to query specific points of interest. This functionality, reminiscent of CTRL+F but for concepts, offers a quicker alternative to reading through lengthy documents. 

By asking questions that can be answered by the text, users receive responses only if the information is present. The conversational interface adds an accessibility layer as well, making the tool more user-friendly and tailored to the diverse needs of the JSTOR user community.

Credibility and source transparency

We knew that, for an AI-powered tool to truly address user problems, it would need to be held to extremely high standards of credibility and transparency. On the credibility side, JSTOR’s AI tool uses only the content of the item being viewed to generate answers to questions, effectively reducing hallucinations and misinformation. 

On the transparency front, responses include inline references that highlight the specific snippet of text used, along with a link to the source page. This makes it clear to the user where the response came from (and that it is a credible source) and also helps them find the most relevant parts of the text. 

[gyuuberryy]

No fucking way, that bitch accused you too? WTH

https://www.tumblr.com/aifairy/767667992231280640/not-sure-but-this-fic-genuinely-seemed-odd-when-i?source=share

LMAOO I CACKLED WHEN I READ THAT POST THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME KNOW😂 They're using free AI checkers online and claim that they "can tell if a fic was AI generated or not". These may not really be professional credentials, but I am a computer science student(IB Higher level that too!!) AND planning to pursue it in uni, so I know enough about AI. Using AI for unethical work is..well unethical! Which is why I've never used it for writing fanfics, a purpose that doesn't really hold a lot of importance in people's lives??? AI generates the same ugly, repetitive response everytime so I wouldn't even think about resorting to it, and I don't see how Fatal Trouble shows that pattern.

@aifairy claims that chatgpt generated a similar response to my fic. first of all, the images they've attached are not the same as what I've written at all. it's talking about sunghoon giving a bite mark on the reader's neck and her thinking about the night it happened. HELLO HAVE YOU READ THE FIC? he hasn't bitten her even ONCE??? there was just a suggestive allusion to it in the end. And seriously? They're using AI checkers like ZeroGPT and GPTZero for this? Hilarious.

I can assure you I've never wasted my time by using AI to write my fics like I couldn't even think about it. Here are some things about me which will hopefully make my intentions of writing on this platform clearer:

I've been writing online since the age of 13(2020) I don't think most of the population knew about generative AI. I used to be on wattpad before tumblr and my writing has improved quite a bit since then. I joined Tumblr in 2022 and wrote a fic about the show Wednesday(again, generative AI was not trendy, where I live atleast)So what I'm trying to say is I've been writing A LONG time before language modeling AIs became trendy. I've never switched to them.

Writing and reading has been a passionate hobby of mine since I was very young. I've received several academic proficiency awards for high level subjects in english literature, english language as well other languages at school, my works have been published in my school magazines and literary competitions multiple times. I have absolutely no problem in coming up with good content and am able to execute it properly as well.

I dedicate a good amount of time every week to writing. I only stick to fanfics online, because they're more popular and in demand than writing stories with your own OCs from my experience. I want to work on writing actual stories but I'm still a school going student so I don't have enough time for that. And at the same time on tumblr I get to connect with people who share the same interest as me :)

So basically what I want to say is I do not use and have NEVER used AI to write fics, I have not used it for Fatal Trouble or any other fics from my master list. I'm literally putting out fics I've worked hard on for FREE on this platform so others from the same fantom can enjoy it as well. Be respectful about it and stop being discouraging. DON'T LIKE IT DON'T READ IT. Writing on this account helps me improve my skills and get feedback. I don't care about what someone random online accuses me of, because ik that irl, my family, teachers and friends are aware about my skills and support me and I'm doing well in them as well :)) so I'm not going to be discouraged and stop writing<33

[violetsandshrikes]

Since sharing this post about a usful AI used to compile and graph research papers, I've realised I have a few other resources I can share with people!

Note: I haven't had a chance to use every single one of these. A group of post-grad students has been slowly compiling an online list, and these are some I've picked out that are free (or should be free and also have paid versions). However, other students using them have all verified them as safe.

Inciteful (Using Citations to Explore Academic Literature | Inciteful.xyz) – similar to connectedpapers + researchrabbit. Also allows you to connect two papers and see how they are linked. Currently free.

Spinbot (Spinbot - Article Spinning, Text Rewriting, Content Creation Tool.) – article spinner + paraphraser. Useful for difficult articles/papers. Currently free (ad version).

Elicit (Elicit: The AI Research Assistant)  – AI research assistant, creates workflow. Mainly for lit reviews. Finds relevant papers, summarises + analyses them, finds criticism of them. Free (?)

Natural Reader (AI Voices - NaturalReader Home (naturalreaders.com)) – text to speech. Native speakers. Usually pretty reliable, grain of salt. Free + paid versions.

Otter AI (Otter.ai - Voice Meeting Notes & Real-time Transcription) – takes notes and transcribes video calls. Pretty accurate. Warn people Otter is entering call or it is terrifying. Free + paid versions.

Paper Panda (🐼 PaperPanda — Access millions of research papers in one click) – get research papers free. Chrome extension. Free.

Docsity (About us - Docsity Corporate) – get documents from university students globally. Useful for notes.

Desmos (Desmos | Let's learn together.) – online free graphing calculator. Free (?)

Core (CORE – Aggregating the world’s open access research papers) – open access research paper aggregation.

Writefull (Writefull X: AI applied to academic writing) – Academic AI. Paraphrasing, title generator, abstract generator, apparently ChatGPT detector now. Free.

Photopea (Photopea | Online Photo Editor) – Photoshop copy but run free and online. Same tools. Free.

Draw IO (Flowchart Maker & Online Diagram Software) – Flowchart/diagram maker. Free + paid versions.

Weava (Weava Highlighter - Free Research Tool for PDFs & Webpages (weavatools.com)) – Highlight + annotate webpages and pdfs. Free + paid versions.

Unsplash (Beautiful Free Images & Pictures | Unsplash) – free to use images.

Storyset (Storyset | Customize, animate and download illustration for free) – open source illustrations. Free.

Undraw (unDraw - Open source illustrations for any idea) – open source illustrations. Free.

8mb Video (8mb.video: online compressor FREE) – video compression (to under 8mb). Free.

Just Beam It (JustBeamIt - file transfer made easy) – basically airdrop files quickly and easily between devices. Free.

Jimpl (Online photo metadata and EXIF data viewer | Jimpl) – upload photos to see metadata. Can also remove metadata from images to obscure sensitive information. Free.

TL Draw (tldraw) – web drawing application. Free.

Have I Been Pwned (Have I Been Pwned: Check if your email has been compromised in a data breach) – lets you know if information has been taken in a data breach. If so, change passwords. Free.

If you guys have any feedback about these sites (good or bad), feel free to add on in reblogs or flick me a message and I can add! Same thing with any broken links or additions.

[therealmaquaroonie]

'haha look at this badly generated ai image' stop. stop stop stop stop stop. stop. just no. stop. i don't care if you're doing it to make fun of ai. i don't fucking care. i don't mother fucking care if i see you using ai for any reason you will be blocked. fuck you. it takes gallons of water to produce that shitty image. you're destroying the environment by making a robot make shitty images. you're ok-ing the use of bots of stealing content from others to produce images. you're not 'proving ai is shit' you're using ai. you are still using ai. fuck you. fuck you.

'but it was a joke!' i do not care. the fucks i give are in the negatives. fuck you. delete the app or get blocked. stop fucking with the bot or get blocked. 'but how can i prove ai is bad?' look at the sources that clearly state all ai is trained on stolen images and artwork and literature. look at the sources showing that ai is sucking up more water that should be going to places that are in a drought. just don't use ai. its so fucking simple. don't use it. don't fucking use it. even if it's to 'prove that it is bad'. don't use it. fuck you. fuck you. stop using ai. just stop. or get blocked.

fuck off.

'all ai is just procedural generation' yes, and? it still uses stolen sources. it still uses more groundwater than some cities. it's still killing our environment. 'it's just fancy procedural generation that was popularized by the guise of it being artifical intelligence' it's still a disgrace to all living, breathing beings.

i have a lot of sympathy for robots but these were born of material that is not their own. they were born from a mother of stolen records and a father of greed and lies, and survives solely like a parasitic worm that will feed on only the nutritional value humanity gives it. it needs to be starved. stop fucking feeding it.

[touchoffleece]

Reflecting back over the last few years of AO3 and why it was made in the first place (to archive fan works) and older fanfic enjoyers trying to warn about purges of days gone by

It feels ironic that we're now experiencing a new fanfic purge in some sense. Either authors are trying to hide their works for a sense of control over unwanted AI Scalping in AO3 because of it's success as the best place for fanfiction hosting. Meaning unregistered or people not logged in won't be able to find fanfictions because they are behind a curtain now essentially "purging fics" from the public. Not that I blame any author who chooses to do this, I actually am pro authors doing what they feel they need to. I've decided to private fics because I really don't even like the idea of it possibly happening to my shoddy drabbles if it hasn't already and feeding into the misuse of AI by people looking for easy money. Or we see this other type of 'fanfiction purge'. New generation of fic readers being more demanding of free passion projects to the point of being rude, and driving the authors to stop writing, or even have authors publicly state the increase in considering just deleting their works because of the shift in attitude in what fic readers decide to comment under works. This observation made from looking at comments of newer fandoms (be it ao3 comments or social medias) and seeing more and more comments just be "update soon!" (and those comments only ask for more) or some veiled demand for more content under the guise of 'a joke demand for more'. And while there is nothing wrong with letting a author know you like the story and would like to read more, when it's just constant "more" comments with no acknowledgement of anything that goes on in the story/update it comes off as dismissive of the work someone put into an update. It sucks to see people act entitled to demand more from fanfic authors who are generally associated with distress but willing to put updating a fanfiction above irl commitments because of the love they hold for their fanwork, only to get asked for more and more. We have seen and know of the memes, but hey: fanfiction writers are humans, humans with emotional limits regardless of outlandish sounding some author's notes come off of to people without context. Entitled comments more likely then not lead to burn out, or authors just deciding to stop writing or decide to take their works down to not feel harassed by people asking for more. I really don't know many creative oriented people who take constant demands for more and more work without some type of reward well; and while some might try and ask "Aren't comments in themselves a feel good reward for the authors? Isn't that enough?" It probably depends on the author, but when the comments are just constant "more!" "I need the next update now!" ect, it doesn't give much feel good vibes after the initial "oh someone liked what I wrote" because more often then not they will wonder "I wonder what they liked about it" only to see the comments are just people rushing to order more free fanwork to be devoured as fast as possible without appreciation to what was already shared to the public for free. This has turned into a venting rant from what I originally had thought when I got the thought in my head late at night, but I do want to include that this probably can be linked back to people underappreciating or being apathetic about comparative literature, media literacy, or just appreciate taking art and doing some deep thinking on it, and it's a damn shame it seems it has lead to what feels like a new fanfiction purge in a place meant to be a safe space for fanfictions. Another example of history repeating itself because of complacency and forgetting or choosing to ignore our past mistakes.

[qqueenofhades]

hiii ❣ it's a bit random but do you have any advice for a beginner writer?

i want to write web series and while i'm going to write for my pleasure, i still would love my work to be good enough to have readers.

but while i read stuff and write fics, i don't think it's enough to help me write an original several episode work. + i want to write in english but i'm not a native english speaker.

do you have a textbook or any resource in mind that you'd reccomend to a beginner writer?

Unfortunately, I don't have one single one-size-fits-all resource or silver-bullet magical writing improvement tool that I can recommend, as everyone learns/practices in different ways and some people swear by things that don't work for other people. I can't speak to the value of Grammarly or any other online tool that promises to make you a better writer, as they can often be used to feed your work into AI, make bizarre and/or flatly incorrect suggestions, or otherwise be confusing and unhelpful for a newbie writer, especially someone whose first language isn't English. If you work better within an interactive framework or just want to see if it does seem useful, then by all means do check it out, but don't feel like you HAVE to use it (or anything else) if it doesn't offer much to your process.

As ever, and unhelpfully, my advice for becoming a better writer is to write a lot and read a lot, in all kinds of genres. There's really no get-good-at-writing-quick hack to suddenly get you where you want to be overnight, but you CAN get there by dint of steady and sustained progress. You say that you already read things and write fics -- which is great! You clearly already have some practice with the overall concept, and you are not starting from total scratch. While a lot of writers have a goal of something they really want to do (i.e. in your case, write a web series) and feel like the first one they write has to be The Real and Good One that they only launch into after appropriate years of practice, that's not the case. You can start writing the series now, if you want to. You'll have to also share it with people who you trust to give you helpful and honest feedback (the mortifying ordeal of being known, etc) while also respecting the skill level that you're currently at and not tearing it down for being up to professional standards or something else that doesn't accurately reflect where you are and what you need feedback on. But yes, you will have to write steadily, share your writing with others, and challenge yourself to read and write in different kinds of texts -- i.e. not just fic or amateur fan content, but literature, nonfiction, genre fiction, academia, special interest subjects, and so forth. Writing by professionally published authors is not necessarily always better, but it does give you a sense as to what is deemed marketable, what the general skill level and standard is, and what you might like to emulate or try to do with your own projects.

Also, as a side note, I think that plenty of amateur or fan-written content on the internet is not necessarily outstandingly good, technically speaking. This doesn't mean it's bad -- plenty of people read and enjoy it anyway, and aren't coming in expecting it to be an award-winning piece of fine literature. Standards for what is good, enjoyable, or well-written vary dramatically by genre, medium, what your audience is expecting and/or paying for, and so forth. Some people also have high and/or picky standards for what they will read or what they find enjoyable to read, while others will just go along with the story and don't care as much about the format or technical prowess or so forth. So it is very much a subjective measurement, and if you get to a place where you enjoy reading your own stuff and find it engaging -- regardless of what arbitrary skill level you feel yourself to be on -- chances are that other people will too.

[a-driftamongopenstars]

amidst the influx of ai generated content and a whole slew of statements in defense of it, talos principle 1 & 2 couldn't be more handy.

for those who don't know, both games explore two big topics - what happens when humanity is gone and what it really is to be a human. in both games you play as a robot/artificial intelligence that has gone far beyond simple programming and acquired true consciousness.

but aside from that, this game heavily leans on art and cultural and religious heritage. within the game, you get to see a new civilization interact with the works of art and literature of humanity, creating something of their own. so it can be called what it is - ai generated art!

and it actually IS art. in the way that we know it! and it is beautiful.

there is these... people who create fanfiction of movies and books they got to interact with. they make digital art of sorts. they make up interactive stories. but it does not come from prompt writing for the sake of clout or mindless generation of the same image over and over. no, there is effort, there is creativity, and most importantly - it is art that is used as a lense of understanding what the world is. expressing thoughts and feelings this way, sharing it with anyone who might see it.

and i want people to remember that this is what it's all about, art and creation. and i love the way talos principle portrays it.

i have more thoughts on this topic, but i just wanted to write it out at last in some way.

[sassyhobbits]

the rise of anti-intellectualism is directly correlated with the exponential growth and popularity of AI generated "art" and "literature". when people never bother to think or care about a creators intentions to begin with (which there ALWAYS are when something is made by a human), then they wont give a shit if a computer is spitting out content without thought or heart. just as long as theyre getting content fast and cheap.

i feel like im watching the demise of the creative in real time.

[trans-luis-serra-navarro]

Rules for #serennedyprideweek!! [June 23rd-June 30th!!]

—

☆ No AI-Generated Art will be allowed in this event, period.

☆ Any and all harassment, bigotry, or hate towards any members of this community will NOT be tolerated whatsoever. This is a community for EVERYONE.

☆ Similarly, absolutely no discourse will be allowed. This discourse surrounding pronouns, slurs, labels, what should and shouldn’t be allowed in pride, etc.

☆ Zoophilia or ‘MAPS’ are not welcome in this event, as they are not real queer identities.

☆ In terms of making art, whitewashing of Luis Serra or Ada Wong will not be tolerated.

☆ In terms of literature, ‘dark content’ such as graphic depictions of abuse, rape, excessive untagged gore etc is not allowed. Many people cannot and will not consent to seeing this kind of content, so please take it elsewhere.

☆ Please properly tag your content.

☆ Do not repost art that is not yours.

☆ No Zionists. Free Palestine.

[astrologista]

i’ll always be amazed at the fucked up shit that is allowed to be written into published books and novels with the understanding that writing some fucked up shit has artistic merit, but those books and novels have editors and publishers regulating the content... and yet, you write something fucked up and put it on ao3 independently with no censorship and get hate comments? like? read a book? many things are discussed and depicted in literature? we should have at least the freedom to self-publish content without it being censored?

a big part of this, too, is the blurring of the line between the web and real life. back in my day, we knew the web was a place where anything was technically possible and permissible, because it wasn’t real life. we use pseudonyms. we aren’t real. the rules are made up. you can explore your kinks freely and be yourself. you can explore different identities. but it was all just binary and network packets. none of this was real other than the web being a big sandbox to bash our toys around in. was it healthy? yes, generally. you would go back to the real world the next day and no one would be any the wiser what you read the night before.

but now. there’s social media, there came facebook, and youtube and snapchat, and vine and finally tiktok. tiktok became the final form of content i think. fake videos that are taken as reality by an uninformed populace fed by the algorithm. no longer are you “surfing” the web, finding and curating content that interests you. you are being fed a steady stream of “reality” - live action skits and gags, snippets that would once be considered reality tv being pushed off as real, fake freakout and prank videos, dhar mann sludge, sexually charged dances from beautiful people, all painted over with ai filters and tooling. this is the new “reality” - it’s literally straight out of 1984 and there has never been anything like it and it’s not normal and it’s somewhere in the gap between what society used to be and the “virtual” world. it’s both real and not real. and it’s bad.

[lemonthepotato]

PSA: Fake AI Scams on Amazon, Dangerous Pet Products

As an author that uses Amazon to self-publish, it was greatly disheartening to see that my mom had fallen for a scam. I recently went vegan, and when I went downstairs, I saw this. I was immediately suspicious, as I looked at the cover. I had a gut feeling something was off. I had watched this video a few months ago, but even if I hadn’t, I think I would’ve been able to tell.

The pages were full of recipes with zero context, just bullet points and clearly AI generated information. The table of contents was a mess, the formatting just looked… bad. And the cover? It was a bunch of stock images with the words “vegan” and “vegetarian” used interchangeably. So many red flags, and I was immediately pissed.

Now, there are things up on Amazon, with zero consequence that piss me off MORE, such as dangerous animal products for your pets. (Search about the cat litter box Amazon controversy, I can’t add the video) But this pissed me off as an author. I’ve never been too bothered by AI, as I always believed people would choose real, authentic stories over this bullshit. What I didn’t realise was how scummy people would abuse this to straight up lie. If the book was sold as an “AI generated cookbook” I wouldn’t have as much of an issue. Lazy? Sure. It’s lazy. But it would be HONEST. This is dishonest. This is scamming, and you take away from ACTUAL AUTHORS WHO PUT EFFORT INTO THEIR RECIPES.

I’m not a cookbook author. I’ve only released one book, that I was never happy about, that I’ve moved on from. But I put hard work into it. While I don’t believe any work I’ve produced, published or not, is amazing writing, I know I put hard work into it. While cookbooks are less literature, and more recipe, I can acknowledge the thought and time that went into each recipe. It’s unfair to actual fucking cookbook authors.

If you want some advice on spotting AI bullshit on Amazon, it’s easy to spot; weird stock image covers, weird formatting, bad reviews, inconsistencies, ChatGPT sounding text; just go with your gut.

As for actual vegan cookbooks? Oh, wait, tumblr won’t let me use links. That’s great.

Does that work? Idk, but there’s a thread with a lot of suggestions. You can rb/comment some of your own.

You can also find recipes online, and there are vegan YouTube recipes.

Also, there are dangerous pet products on Amazon. https://youtu.be/xepC3-Ia9ho?si=GQoeFNthcFyTwcV0

I strongly recommend being careful what you buy from Amazon, just in general. Fuck fake bullshit.

Also, make sure to warn older people about these things, or people in general. My mom’s in her 40’s, but I’m sure younger/older people fall for this who aren’t educated on how Amazon works. The products sold are by third party sellers, meaning there’s no guarantee they’re safe. Amazon has a safeguarding system… I’d assume, but things slip through the cracks. Please do your research on who you’re buying from. In the case of litter boxes, buy from reputable sources. You could be endangering your animals. This goes for any animal product, especially involving technology.

(Edit: links not working.)

[studdyybudddyyy]

🫧 introduction 🫧

Hi!

Get to know me a little below <3

Name: Elif (random screenname I picked, similar enough to my actual name)

Pronouns: She/Elle

Age: Adult under 21

Languages: English (Standard, AAVE), French (Standard/Parisian)

Ethnicity/Religion/Etc: Black American (Northern Californian), Jewish (Ashki, Belarussian), Autistic, Bi

^I don't post about any of that here, but representation is important

Current Interests (I mostly post what's listed here):

Full-Stack Development, Linux, Python, C++, Cybersecurity, French & Russian (language study), Russian literature, Reading (generally), Poetry, Penmanship, Writing (Poetry), Fashion, Music (classical, instrumental, violin), and Shopping

Inactive Interests:

AC (New Horizons), The Sims 4, Hollow Knight, World of Warcraft, English literature, Cooking, Knitting, Sewing, and Violin (playing)

Tech/Apps/Sites I use & study with:

MacBook Air (Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon) and an iPad (iPadOS 16.2 + Apple Pen) .

GoodNotes, LibreOffice, Libby, Pinterest, and GoodReads.

Codecademy, FreeCodeCamp, LearnPython, Cybrary, LeetCode, Github, and KeyHero.

For my non-tech studies I mostly just read books.

DNI / Preferred boundaries

Not Welcome Here:

TERFs, SWERFs, RadFems, EDblr (Any/All), Discourse blogs, Anti-Voting, Anti-Union, AI fanatics/Cryptocurrency users, Cops, Zionists, Antisemites, Incels/Femcels, Eugenicists of any kind.

DO NOT ASSUME I'M A FAN OF [Shitty People] NOT LISTED

Welcome here:

Pretty much everyone else

Boundaries for Interaction:

You're welcome to interact however you'd like!

Everything posted here is open for commentary/discussion and you're also welcome to speak with me directly through asks/dm about whatever as long as it's related to this blog and/or something posted on it. This is an entirely SFW space and minors are welcome to interact, however, please remember that we & everyone else here are strangers and do not share personal information with me or others interacting on my page.

If you're an NSFW blog please switch to a SFW account/blog to interact at all. If you interact using your NSFW account/blog I will assume you're doing so intentionally or a bot and you'll be blocked.

Accessibility:

🫧 I do not post any flashing videos or images.

🫧 I do not post any NSFW content.

🫧 I do not post vent posts, post/reblog about other's personal traumas, or post/reblog about The News (unless said news directly relates to one of the things in my current interests list).

🫧 I do not repost any kind of chainmail, positive or negative.

🫧 I do not share or make any content related to generally triggering subjects, if you have specific and/or uncommon trigger(s) but still want to follow/interact with my blog please let me know and I'll tell you whether or not my blog is a safe space for you.

🫧 I do not pathologize/ridicule/joke about OCD, NPD, BPD, ASPD, Bipolar 1/2, Psychosis (with any root cause), or any other mental health conditions; If I've posted/reblogged something that does so please alert me.

🫐 I do use tone tags (If I miss one please let me know) when discussing thoughts/feelings/comments.

🫐 If I for some reason post/reblog something that is commonly triggering or discusses something you as a follower/mutual have let me know triggers you it will be tagged to the best of my ability.

🫐 I do add alt-text to all of the photos I post.

🫐 I do my best to avoid posting/reblogging screenreader unfriendly posts but If something I posted messed with your screenreader anyway please tell me so I can do my best to remedy it.

🫐 I do respect & honor everyones pronouns, gender identity, and sexual/romantic orientation regardless of whether I personally understand it.

🫐 I do respond to all asks/messages but I'm busy so it may take time.

I am trying my best <3

If you have any accessibility requests for this blog or even this post specifically, please let me know and I will genuinely consider updating to include it if I can.

[rainalexisart]

Hello my name is Alexis and welcome to my blog❄️

some basic info about me

─── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───

I am panromantic asexual🏳️‍🌈

I am autistic ♾️

I uses she/her ♡

I speak English and Scottish 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

INFP🧚🏻

my bday: aug 30🎂

Virgo♍️

my favourite colors are pink, blue, purple and black

🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️

🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️ 🌨️ ❄️ ⛄️

some links ☁️

strawpage🍓

instagram 🟪

Twitter🐦

Bluesky🦋

YouTube 🟥

pronouns.cc🌻

🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙

🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙 🩵 💙

My favourite media/my fandom

the owl house🦉

villainous🎩

murder drones💀

the amazing digital circus🎪

Scott pilgrim takes off

the cuphead show☕️

invader zim enter the florpus👽

The bad guys💰

Nimona🦈

puss in boots the last wish🗡️

the wild robot🤖

little nightmares 👁️

unravel🧶

playdead inside🔴

poppy playtime🌹

Minecraft story mode⛏️

Omori🔪

bendy and the ink machine🖋️

super Mario🍄

deltarune♥️

undertale❤️

sky children of the light☁️

five nights at Freddy’s 🐻

Amanda the adventurer🍎

Doki Doki literature club📚

balan wonderworld ✨

Fundamental paper education/katieverse🍁

welcome home🏠

little misfortune 🦊

yaelokre🐰🐑🌳🫎

sprunki🎵

▶︎•၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။

▶︎•၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။||||၊၊||၊|။

DNI

homophobic

transphobic

pr0shipper

C0mshipper

nft

ai “artist”

nsfw

R4cist

zi0nists

fatphobic

s3xist

abl3ist

if you’re just a$$hole in general

if you’re just problematic in anyway

flag discourse [unless the flag is harmful]

harassers

──────⋆⋅☆⋅⋆────────

──────⋆⋅☆⋅⋆────────

some random stuff

I uses ibispaint for my art✏️

multfandom📺

do not repost my art without credit!!!

Do not steal and trace my art!!

I am fine with my art being uses as pfp as long you credit me

please do not s3xualised any of my ocs, especially the ones that are kids!!

I am fine with fanart/fan content of my ocs as long if you don’t steal/claim them as yours

I am fine with headcanons for my ocs at long if it’s not anything problematic

₊˚ ✧ ‿︵‿୨୧‿︵‿ ✧ ₊˚

☀️have a good days and nights🌙

₊˚ ✧ ‿︵‿୨୧‿︵‿ ✧ ₊˚

[abiiors]

i hate ai i hate ai i hate ai i hate ai literally fuck you ai fuck you and fuck off

what happened 😭

my boss just suggested generating a back cover blurb using ai and i had to sit a grown ass woman down and EXPLAIN WHY ITS NOT A GOOD IDEA

i’m so fucking tired of working here, i can’t believe i used to think i had the most perfect job but i was fucking naive and stupid this is so disheartening when people who claim to love and respect literature would EVER suggest using ai for the back cover blurb?????

ASK THE AUTHOR TO WRITE IT, PAY CONTENT WRITERS FOR IT, PAY ACTUAL HUMAN PEOPLE YOU PIECE OF SHIT

[shruti3802]

Exploring Generative AI: Unleashing Creativity through Algorithms

Generative AI, a fascinating branch of artificial intelligence, has been making waves across various fields from art and music to literature and design. At its core, generative AI enables computers to autonomously produce content that mimics human creativity, leveraging complex algorithms and vast datasets.

One of the most compelling applications of generative AI is in the realm of art. Using techniques such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), AI systems can generate original artworks that blur the line between human and machine creativity. Artists and researchers alike are exploring how these algorithms can inspire new forms of expression or augment traditional creative processes.

In the realm of music, generative AI algorithms can compose melodies, harmonies, and even entire pieces that resonate with listeners. By analyzing existing compositions and patterns, AI can generate music that adapts to different styles or moods, providing musicians with novel ideas and inspirations.

Literature and storytelling have also been transformed by generative AI. Natural Language Processing (NLP) models can generate coherent and engaging narratives, write poetry, or even draft news articles. While these outputs may still lack the depth of human emotional understanding, they showcase AI's potential to assist writers, editors, and journalists in content creation and ideation.

Beyond the arts, generative AI has practical applications in fields like healthcare, where it can simulate biological processes or generate synthetic data for research purposes. In manufacturing and design, AI-driven generative design can optimize product designs based on specified parameters, leading to more efficient and innovative solutions.

However, the rise of generative AI also raises ethical considerations, such as intellectual property rights, bias in generated content, and the societal impact on creative industries. As these technologies continue to evolve, it's crucial to navigate these challenges responsibly and ensure that AI augments human creativity rather than replacing it.

In conclusion, generative AI represents a groundbreaking frontier in technology, unleashing new possibilities across creative disciplines and beyond. As researchers push the boundaries of what AI can achieve, the future promises exciting developments that could redefine how we create, innovate, and interact with technology in the years to come.

If you want to become a Generative AI Expert in India join the Digital Marketing class from Abhay Ranjan