2nd person pronouns:vou/vou/vour/vours/vourself and vourselveszoum/zoum/zoums/zoumself3rd person pronouns:xenopronouns, sonone
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
categories and categorization are harmful and oppressive and will never include everything nor every nuance, itâs impossible, theyâre essentially simplication into made up groups
and simplification will always be harmful and wrong and ignoring reality
1 note
·
View note
Text
hate the concept of âowning someoneâ, people are not your property! (talking mostly about monoamorous relationships/exclusive relationships, but it applies to everything) Itâs so toxic!! Itâs harmful and oppressive. âOwningâ is white supremacy, after that you add the layers of oppression like sexism, ableism, everything else, cause they all apply.
You donât own the person youâre in a [whatever kind of] relationship with, theyâre not yours, youâre not theirs. Again this comes from heavy insecurity and the âcheatingâ bullshit. Heavy insecurity of not trusting, of someone leaving you, someone replacing you, not being enough, of lack of communication about feelings. The âcheatingâ bullshit being built on the idea of âowning someoneâ and heavy insecurity, a lot of it coming from monotheistic religions. Itâs oppression. Itâs harmful.
That fear of someone leaving is accentuated by the way we approach relationships nowâŠ: as temporary, useless or barely important; and beings: reducing them to anything you like or dislike/hate, reducing them to pain or your pain; weâre irreducible, reducing people is white supremacy, itâs restraining the being and pretending theyâre only that, or that theyâre the systems, what theyâve been taught and are repeating, their actions and inactions, itâs white supremacy, we arenât that. We arenât the systems of oppression, we arenât what weâve been taught, we arenât our actions nor inactions. And never giving people the space to learn, even though everyone, everyone, can learn and unlearn. Everyone.
This might raise the question of âwhat are we?â, with all that we arenât, what would make us? We are beings, people, nature, magic, whole, worthful, enough, important, valid, okay as we are, were and will be, love, irreducible and equal, weâre everything all at once, weâre more than 6 dimensional beings. (love is not romantic attraction, love is not sexual attraction, love is not sex, romantic attraction is not love, sexual attraction is not love, sex is not love. It has been all reduced. Love is an essence, magic, at the base of every being, itâs what gives us feelings and care, what makes us hate violence, oppression...)
You cannot be replaced, your being is irreplaceable, you are irreplaceable, nobody can replace you. Everyone loves you, everyone longs for you. Every person you had a relationship with longs for you and wishes you were there. Even people whom you never talked to in your life, someone might know you from afar, but they still long for you. Because we love everyone, we want everyone. Even though realistically we canât have a relationship with everyone, itâs impossible, we canât handle it, but we still have that connection with every being, we werenât made to live with thousands of humans, we are hunter gatherers who live in tribes of 100-150 humans, weâre not supposed to know (in practicality, not theory) more than that amount of humans. Thatâs one of the reasons why the world we live in is so harmful. Nobody can replace you, weâre so different, even though weâre all the same, weâre all also different from each other.
You are enough, you always were, youâll always be, you have nothing to change about you, you always were whole, we change naturally over time and our experiences, etc, and weâre all enough.
Lack of communication about feelings, that is learned. That shows a lack of trust and fear that someone has all these negative feelings, pain, suppressed and repressed feelings related to you. Itâs taught. Thatâs how most of us grew up, not speaking about our feelings, with emotional neglect and harm surrounding sharing your feelings, it wasnât safe for us when we grew up to share our feelings or even show them or some of them or them fully. Itâs white supremacy; emotional invalidation, emotional neglect, harm, oppression, like childism and ageism. Itâs not being given a space for your feelings, you might repeat the way you grew up and not allow a safe space to exist. We need emotional validation, being heard and understood, listened to, we need others to share our feelings, empathy, being related to and relate to, we need compassion and some kind of empathy. We need to be given a space to share our feelings, being able to speak, think, take our time, process and experience.
We all deep down know it, in our beings, it shows in our actions and feelings, some itâs more or less obvious than others, but it all shows, our care and love shows. We know deep down that weâre whole, irreducible, worthful, important, equal and enough, we have to realize it on a more surface level, as a collective and individuals, but itâs really hard, because it got to that harmful point, because of the way weâve been treated and are still treated to this day, weâre treated as if weâre not all of that, weâre treated as worthless, unimportant, unequal, not enough, not okay, not whole, wrong, but weâre not and itâs not okay how weâve been and are treated. We need to change the collective view we have of each other.
And you have nothing to prove. Youâre not anyoneâs property and nobodyâs your property. Your feelings are not to be proven, theyâre true and real, you donât have to âproveâ them. Itâs the same for everyone else. Consider that people can tell the truth, that people arenât trying to hurt you or mock you or use you, theyâre repeating the way theyâve been treated, they donât know itâs wrong. Consider that people can genuinely have feelings for you (again, âhaving feelings forâ isnât âfeeling romantic attraction forâ nor âfeeling sexual attraction forâ nor âfeeling familial attraction forâ nor âfeeling platonic attraction forâ. Feeling romantic attraction for doesnât mean âhaving feelings forâ, thatâs reducing what feelings inherently are, theyâre feelings, theyâre emotions, thoughts, experiences, not attraction, even though some of these feelings might be/are some kind of attraction (not necessarily romantic, sexual, platonic, familial, whatever)) Consider that people can genuinely feel attraction for you, like how you feel attraction sometimes, itâs genuine, itâs there, well itâs the same for these people, they also feel, it could be attraction. (not trying to push romantic attraction onto yâall, but âattractionâ is not romance and it doesnât equate to romantic/sexual/familial attraction. It has been reduced. Itâs not that) Weâve been alienated from each other. Weâre so gaslighted, and we know it too, and alienated from each other, that we âdonâtâ believe others could be saying the truth. Weâre scared that they might hurt us, cause weâve been so hurt, weâre scared to believe, to âbe playedâ. Consider that itâs never the intentions of anyone, nobody wants that deep down, weâre love and magic, we care for each other naturally, we love each other. Weâre repeating what weâve been taught, not that anyone actually means that deep down (your feelings are valid and important)
*sorry about the âagainsâ, it sounded like unnecessary aggression, itâs my suppressed feelings about the way society forgets that and doesnât take it into account, nor considers that it might be âallâ wrong and harmful (âallâ is an exaggeration, donât know if itâs necessarily âall wrongâ, maybe not, most of the time, nothing is âall somethingâ, but it doesnât always apply, maybe it is, right now I donât feel like questioning that, Iâm hungry and wanna do something else, yeah this was all written in one time) it makes us feel anger and pain, itâs nearly everywhere too, so itâs very frustrating, constantly. Canât even listen to songs without that, the joy given to by the internet gets put into the recycling bin by the youtube ads and ads in general, the songs, the videos, the comments, itâs SO EXHAUSTING!! đ«đ©
đ©·đ©·đ©”đđđđ€
Itâs like the red heart that never uses, unless make a rainbow of hearts, because red with hearts has been WAY too associated with romance, romantic attraction, and since [..] feel romance repulsed and am aroace, itâs really frustrating and ruins most of it for self đ«đ©đ€
Thereâs more to red, to hearts, to red hearts and red with hearts or pink with hearts or even orange or purple with hearts than romance and romantic attraction! Thereâs more to it than platonic attraction too! and that goes for every color, every hearts, every color with hearts, yellow with hearts, blue with hearts, orange with hearts, green with hearts, everything! â€ïž
thereâs something else realized forgot to talk about it, and it disgusts self and upsets self so much that people even think that, that gonna mention it quickly, because it needs to be said:
You donât own someone, you donât own anyoneâs body, youâre not the only one who should have access to anyoneâs body nor who gets to, same thing for the other way around, nobodyâs the only one who has access to your body. Weâre collective beings. Nobody ever feels attraction towards a single person, nobody ever feels any feeling towards a single person. Nobody ever feels comfortable being touched by one person ever, that is taught. It IS taught. Itâs taught and am sick of it.
*sorry about the aggression, am tired, wanna post this, wanna stop, am upset and want all the oppression to end
#monogamy#monoamory#polyamorous#polyamory#cheating#amatonormativity#exclusive relationships#exclusive relationship#inclusive relationships#allonormativity#oppressive#oppression#end white supremacy#anarchism#anti hierarchies#anti hierarchy#anti oppression#anti white supremacy#aroace#aro ace#aromantic#asexual#aromantic asexual#romantic attraction#sexual attraction#romance#romance repulsed
1 note
·
View note
Text
Why is it so hard to dare not misgender yourself? Specifically when you use really nonconforming pronouns⊠/ngenq /rh
It feels scary
1 note
·
View note
Text
The pain of specifically saying your 2nd person pronouns and nobody ever uses them⊠they misgender you instead⊠đąđ«đĄ
#genderism#misgendering#2ndp pronouns#2nd person pronouns#2ndp neos#2ndp neopronouns#2nd person neopronouns#2nd person neos#genderism vent
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Letâs not refer to skills, feelings and what you like and dislike as good/bad.
Being a beginner is not a bad thing, itâs not bad. Being skilled is not good, itâs not better, yes it might be more practical for survival skills, but itâs still not better. Skills are not a hierarchy.
Feelings are not bad, feelings are not good, thereâs no good nor bad feelings/emotions, thereâs no better nor worse feeling/emotion, all emotions are a part of us, equal and each just as important and worthful.
What you like is not better, itâs not good, what you dislike is not bad and itâs not worse. Things are not defined by your liking or dislike towards them, theyâre not inherently defined by your feelings towards them. Things are not inherently good nor bad, not likeable/dislikable, not inherently fun nor boring, etc.
What you may like, someone else dislikes it, what you may dislike, someone else likes it, what may give you fun, bores someone else, what may bore you, gives fun to someone else. Itâs a spectrum, a wide range of diversity. (this is excluding things like oppression and mistreatment)
#end white supremacy#anti white supremacy#anti hierarchies#anti hierarchy#anti oppression#anti xtian supremacy#anarchy
1 note
·
View note
Text
Hierarchies are the root cause of every oppression that exists, the second you get rid of them, oppression will cease to exist as well. Why? Because oppression is on the hierarchal idea that one group is below/above the other. If everyone actually realizes that everything is actually equal and thereâs nothing inferior to you nor superior to you, oppression will cease to exist automatically, by itself.
If everyone viewed things the way they are, which is everything is inherently equal, then everyone would feel really happy. I donât know whatâs holding back people, probably a lack of self worth and collective worth. Which, by the way, were all created through lies and lack of shown love, care and truth. Which is caused by the systems we live in. Itâs all a cycle, the systems create low self and collective worth, which makes people reproduce the systems even more and not allow themselves to believe in the reality that weâre all equals.
Most people are constantly bringing themselves and others down through the repeated violence the systems have taught us, which is so common that most donât even realize how often theyâre bringing anything down.
#anti hierarchies#anti hierarchy#anarchism#collectivism#socialism#anti white supremacy#anti oppression#oppressive#oppressive systems#anti capitalism#anti ableism#equality#equity#hierarchies
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Content warning: contains emotionally invalidating words, although followed later by validation
[..] think most people donât realize how insidious and commonized [emotional] invalidation are. Like when someone says âthank youâ and gets responded to with âno problemâ, âyou donât have to thank meâ, âdonât thank meâ, etc. thatâs emotional invalidation. Have you considered how the person might wanna thank you sincerely? Itâs okay to thank people, if you feel like you wanna thank someone then do thank them (not in the âIâm telling you to do itâ way, but in the sense that you are to yourself, if you are). Yes, problem. âNo problemâ is so invalidating, itâs so commonized that most say it without thinking about it, or without realizing it. Your feelings are valid. You can feel that way. That short phrase is telling people not to feel whatever theyâre feeling, which is straight up emotional invalidation. You can feel whatever youâre feeling. Thereâs also the word âjustâ, that is sooo invalidating. âOnlyâ and âjustâ should only be used when meaning â1 thingâ, like right now. Not used in relation to anyoneâs feelings, never ever. Because itâs never âonlyâ that, itâs never âjustâ that, people feel the need to use that because they feel the need to suppress their emotions and feelings. Same thing with the âat leastâ, itâs not as common, fortunately (most likely due to it being more known as invalidation than the others), but itâs still widely used. So, yes, problem. Do thank people. Do feel the need to thank people. A way, personally, really like to cancel invalidation, and replace it with validation is by saying the opposite repeated times, which works. Like right now. So yes problem, do have to thank âyouâ, do thank âyouâ, you can feel this way and if you do, you do. You also donât have to do it (in the sense that am not telling you âfeel this way!â âfeel like thatâ âdo this, you have toâ), itâs okay not to thank people, itâs okay not to express your feelings and emotions. Itâs okay not to express your thankfulness. Itâs okay and valid to feel thankful. Itâs okay and valid to wanna say âthank youâ, itâs okay to say âthank youâ. Itâs okay and valid to not wanna say âthank youâ too, thereâs nothing wrong with not wanting to say it and thereâs nothing wrong with wanting to say it either.
.đđđ
The reason some people may say that varies, but itâs usually due to them being scared to feel emotions, feeling not worthy enough to have positive emotions and get thanked. SadlyâŠ. đđąđŁ Itâs angering. Really hate the world we live in đ«đĄđđ đą
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Itâs okay to invent things, to make up words, to create new words and expressions. Thereâs nothing wrong with making up things, stories, words, expressions, anything
1 note
·
View note
Text
Itâs okay to stutter. There is nothing wrong with stuttering. You can stutter and thatâs okay. Itâs not wrong, itâs not bad. Itâs not unnecessary, itâs a natural part of life, itâs involuntary and thatâs okay.
Yes, stutter. Yes, you can stutter. Do stutter. Anything saying otherwise is a lie and wrong. Anything saying or even implying that âstuttering is badâ or that âyouâre not allowed to stutterâ, is ableist. Itâs lies, fake, untrue. Itâs ableism. Which is wrong.
You donât have to conform. You donât have to do anything. You donât have to look like a robot, you donât have to act like a robot. Even A.I. stutters. Itâs natural and thereâs nothing wrong nor âundesirableâ about it.
Yes, it might be inconvenient, but itâs not bad for that reason. Inconvenience is a part of life. Nothing wrong with inconvenience. Nothing wrong with taking your time [to speak]. Nothing wrong with stuttering.
You can inconvenience people (in the sense, that itâs okay and thereâs nothing wrong nor bad about it). Do inconveniences. The reason theyâre looked down upon is because they challenge the systems, specifically capitalism, but all the other ones as well too.
You have time. Everyone has the time to listen to you, speak and stutter. You have the time to stutter. And thatâs okay.
Itâs okay to take up space. Itâs okay to take up time. Itâs okay to take up noise space. Itâs okay to take up noise space, space and time. Itâs okay to take up space in other peopleâs minds, thoughts and feelings. Thereâs nothing wrong with taking up any kind of space. You are not an inconvenience. Youâre not an inconvenience, nobody is, no one is, not you, not user, not us. You are enough as you are. You are whole. You are worthful.
Itâs alright and fine to stutter. Your feelings are valid and okay too. I know itâs hard, I know the systems, which are reproduced into society and by people, are insidious and attack everyone saying that âitâs thisâ, âitâs thatâ, and blah blah blah. We know they make us feel like and think that itâs bad, like itâs wrong, they make us feel mad, sad and other negative emotions for not conforming, and those emotions and feelings are valid. Thereâs nothing wrong with them. Theyâre real and true. đđ So yes, do stutter đ
#stuttering#stutter#anti ableism#ableism#anti intellectualism#end white supremacy#oppressive#inconveniences#take up space#validation#you are enough#you are worthful#youâre not an inconvenience
48 notes
·
View notes
Text
"Like all foreigners, the Jewish settlers sailed first to Alexandria, took a ferry to Jaffa, and were taken ashore by small boats. This mundane arrival at the shore appears in the settlersâ statements as aggressive and alien treatment: âAravim Hetikifu Ottanuâ â âthe Arabs assaulted usâ â is the phrase used to describe the simple act of Palestinian boys helping settlers to small boats on the way to Jaffa; they shouted because the waves were high and asked for baksheesh [tips] because this was how they managed to live. But in the settlersâ narrative they were assailants. Noise, presumably a normal feature of life in the Jewish townships of Eastern Europe, becomes menacing when produced by Palestinian women wailing in the traditional salute of joy to the sailors returning safely home. For the settlers this was the behaviour of savages, âwith fiery eyes and a strange garroted language.â Whether the topic is their language, their dress or their animals, reports back to Europe concerning the Palestinians were all about unpleasantness and weirdness. ... Again and again, Zionist settlers behaved as a people who had been insulted â either objectively in the form of a physical attack, but more often simply by the very presence of Palestinians in Palestine. ... The Zionist settlers instituted retaliation for âtheftâ, which was how they characterised the rural tradition of cultivating state land, a practice that was legal under Ottoman law. Picking fruit from roadside orchards became an act of robbery only after Zionism took over the land. The words shoded (robber) and rozeach (murderer) were flung about with ease when Palestinians involved in such acts were described. After 1948 these terms would be replaced with âterroristâ and âsaboteurâ. ... Cleansing the land of its farmers and tenants was done at first through meeting in the Zionist madafa and then by force of eviction in Mandatory times. The âgoodâ Palestinians were those who came to the madafa and allowed themselves to be evicted. Those who refused were branded robbers and murderers. Even Palestinians with whom the settlers sometimes shared ownership of horses or long hours of guard duty were transformed into villains once they refused eviction. Later on, wherever Israelis would control the lives of Palestinians, such a refusal to collaborate would be the ultimate proof for Palestinian choice of the terrorist option as a way of life. ... Following the 1967 war ... both Israeli academics and Israeli media commonly used the term âterrorismâ when referring to any kind of Palestinian political, social and cultural activity. âPalestinian terrorismâ was depicted as having been present from the very beginning of the Zionist project in Palestine and still being there when academic research into it began in earnest. This characterisation was so comprehensive and airtight that it assigned almost every chapter in Palestinian history to the domain of âterrorismâ and absolved hardly any of the organisations and personalities that made up the Palestinian national movement from the accusation of being terrorists."
Ilan Pappé, The Idea of Israel: A History of Power and Knowledge (2014)
#free palestine#palestine#palestine genocide#israel#free palestine đ”đž#free gaza đ”đž#palestinian genocide#justice for palestinians#palestinian liberation#anti zionisim#colonialism#colonization#colonial violence
3K notes
·
View notes
Note
Hello sorry for tagging. I am very sick, my asthma is at its maximum level, my nose freezes, I have no medicine or food. I am in bad shape financially, I am a black disabled, who uses multiple medications, I pay for my food and lodging
Unfortunately I do not have all the resources to keep me safe, that is why I need your help, whatever you can contribute to me will be of great help.
Anyone who can help, it would be really great if you helped out.
The link is on this personâs account, the pinned post!
#fundraising#fundraiser#disabled#mutual aid#mutual support#support#community aid#community support#gofundme#emergency#urgent#urgent funds#emergency aid#financial aid#financial support
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Why is ranking friends, relationships even a thing? Why are there literal names that exist due to hierarchies? Why do you have to name and put a specific label on the person youâre the closest to and always prioritize them? Why? /rh You know, you feel it, you know youâre the closest to this person already, so why put that into words and put it into a hierarchy? Your best friend isnât more important than anyone else. Where is equality in this? /rh Everyoneâs worth is equal. /srs Why do you âhaveâ to tell people that you view someone else as more important than them and that you love someone else more? /rh Why? /rh It hurts. Letâs actually stop putting relationships and people into hierarchies. Itâs so insidious, commonized and internalized in this society that most people donât even realize how bad it is.
âyouâ /nay specifically
#anarchy#anarchism#anarchist#relationship anarchy#hierarchies#hierarchy#oppression#oppressive#hierarchies are inherently linked to every system of oppression and discrimination#without hierarchies oppression wouldnât exist and supremacies wouldnât exist
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
a reminder or an "elucidation", adoption is bad and wrong
the propaganda that adoption is "good", positive or even neutral is all false and wrong
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
The phrase "don't forget..." is ableist. It implies that the person can't forget and that it's bad or wrong to forget, which are both untrue. It's okay to forget. There's nothing wrong with forgetting. Also the phrase is also used especially when someone forgets something a lot, and that's ableist. It implies that there's something bad about forgetting it all the time, and that there's something wrong with the person or their memory, which isn't true nor okay. don't know how else to explain it, it's ableist and there's nothing bad about forgetting. You don't need to remember anything. Also, the idea of "good" and "bad" memory is inherently ableist and wrong.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Your feelings are valid. Your feelings matter. Your feelings are important. Your emotions are valid. Your emotions matter. Your emotions are important. It's okay to feel this way. Your emotions are okay. Your feelings are okay. There's nothing wrong with a single of your feelings. There's nothing wrong with a single of your emotions. Your feelings matter and they're important. Your emotions matter and they're important. There is nothing wrong with feeling. There's nothing wrong with feeling this emotion. Your feelings are real and true. Your feelings are real and true. Your emotions are real and true. You matter. You are important. You are worthful. You are enough. You are whole. You are okay. /li
If you need emotional validation, it's okay to DM me. I 100% believe that your feelings and emotions matter, are okay and valid and there's nothing wrong or bad about them. [..] would love to emotionally validate anyone who asks 𫶠/gen You don't have to, either. /gen
#emotional validation#emotions are valid#validation#feelings are valid#it's okay to feel#you are enough#you are whole#you are worthful#you matter#you are important#emotional support
1 note
·
View note
Text
Letâs not blame feelings for existing. Itâs not a bad thing that someone feels disgusted by [insert whatever thing that doesnât conform], the feelings arenât bad. Letâs actually think about it, what caused the feeling to begin with? Itâs not by invalidating the feelings that theyâre gonna disappear or that the cause will disappear, itâs gonna have a reverse effect actually. Feelings will always be neutral, always, literally always neutral. If someone laughs at [whatever they laugh at] and it hurts, itâs easy to blame the feelings and pretend they are wrong, when they arenât. The truth isnât their feeling that hurts, itâs what caused them to laugh, the reason you assume or know they laugh, what they might think that causes them to feel this way and laugh, thatâs what hurts you, not the feeling actually. The feeling is a consequence, a byproduct of the thought. Like [..] said, feelings will always be neutral, true (but true doesnât necessarily mean âfactâ*). Thereâs nothing wrong with a single emotion, with a single feeling. None of them are wrong, none of them are bad. Feelings are always a result of something, thereâs always a cause for them, the cause may not be always obvious and it might be really hard to identify it, but feelings donât just exist on their own. They donât randomly appear.
*but true doesnât necessarily mean âfactâ meaning that feelings are always true, but that doesnât necessarily make whatever the feelings are about or what caused them inherently that feeling or inherently good/bad/wrong. e.g. a color might make you feel really mad, but it doesnât make the color bad, yet your feelings are still real, true and they matter. Also this doesnât always apply, feelings can teach a lot about what is wrong, what is âgoodâ.
#peopleâs feelings are valid#feelings matter#feelings#emotional validation#emotional invalidation#emotions are valid#emotions are important#feelings are valid#feelings are important#emotions matter
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Letâs stop calling socio-political issues, systems, systems of oppression, power and harm, beliefs. They are not beliefs. They do not define anyone and they are not a part of anyoneâs identity. Weâve all been brainwashed at the end of the day, and knowing you were, doesnât make you better, more worthy, truer nor is it a part of who you are nor your identity. Itâs false that systems of oppression (white supremacy, racism, ableism, genderism, sexism, classism, sizeism, elitism, ageism, sexualitism, etc.) are beliefs. You are not defined by your knowledge about those things, you are not defined by how much you educate yourself, you are not defined by what you know is wrong nor by those systems. Systems are simply not a part of anyone, they arenât. You arenât them, you never were and never will be. Believing a bunch of ableist things and that itâs okay, isnât âbeing ableistâ, itâs having internalized ableism, a system of oppression linked to every other one, itâs having been brainwashed to the point that you think that, but it still doesnât define you. Same thing with knowing that ableism is wrong, recognizing ableism, it doesnât define you, itâs not a part of who you are and it doesnât make you any better. Letâs stop defining people by those systems, because itâs white supremacy, wrong and simply not okay and false. Nobody is inherently anything, nobody was born to not care, nobody was born believing in those things, they were all taught. People are taught to equate their worth with what they believe in, with the systems of oppression they have internalized and been victims of, people are taught not to care. Everyone can learn, whatever their age, however much of the disgusting systems of oppression they have internalized, everyone can learn and unlearn. Everyone. Even the most right wing folks can. Even the ones who refuse to listen, even the ones who say they donât care. They were taught to refuse to listen, they were taught not to care. They were taught lies, but that doesnât make them liars, however much lies they might be saying and spreading. Iâm not saying that itâs okay, Iâm not defending this, Iâm defending the people, not the systems. The systems are still very wrong, oppressive and harmful, but systems and people are not the same thing. Beliefs are personal things, not systems of oppression you have internalized. You are worthy, you are enough, you are worthful. You always were worthy, you always were enough, you always were worthful. You are simply not your actions, you are not your inactions, you are not your mistakes. Your actions and inactions are not you. You are not your knowledge and your worth isnât defined by your knowledge. đ©”đ
#end white supremacy#leftism#activism#unlearning#systems#systems of oppression#systems are at play not you#you are not the systems#you are worthy#you are enough
6 notes
·
View notes