#wide model

[imagingchamber]

why is he proportioned like that in nwos. what did they do to him.

[mickedy]

You have quite the task ahead of you

[virginsuicidgirl]

[steven-myself]

Art Deco - Wilfred Wong by Baldovino Barani x FACTORY Fanzine

[akkivee]

KUUKOU DOES THE HAYAMA SPIN 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[synsick]

Kyotocat ph Sick Syn

[dischordantcerebralballistics]

Leelee Sobieski. The most beautiful actress ever 💕💕

[theneptuneflytrap]

So...I found this picture online and it took me down the craziest Transformers rabbit hole that I now need to share with y'all. This isn't Jazz this is Kawasaki Prime who was modeled after Jazz. He's from an event called Cybertron Satellite which involved giving towns and cities throughout Japan a "Town Commander": Autobots assigned to defend that town/city. Kawasaki Prime was assigned to protect the city of Kawasaki, known as the "City of Music". Additionally, he was given the ability to control water with his "Bridge Spear". This is likely due to Kawasaki's closeness to the Tama River.

[truly-sincerely]

Tyrant and Murderer

[victusinveritas]

Uh-huh. Yep. Definitely a model cucumber.

[tanzdoesthings]

needs some testing in vr BUT. yeah. be afraid. he crashed my computer in the process. idk why but that power is out there now.

who let this guy out

[psychoticallytrans]

There are three main models of disability that are in common use. The moral model, the medical model, and the social model.

You may not have heard of the moral model before, but if you are disabled, you have felt the impact of it. The moral model is disability as a failure of character. It sources the problem of disability in the character of the disabled person. It's the people who insist that if you just tried harder, were better, had a better attitude, that you would no longer be disabled. It is a model that is used by ableists in order to conceptualize of disability as a failing of the individual. An extreme example of this mindset are the Christian Scientists, who believe that all illnesses and disabilities should be healed by the grace of their god and that if you are not healed, something is wrong with you. It is the the most cruel of the models, and the least successful at assisting disabled people.

The medical model is the model used by the medical establishment and by those who put their stock in medical authority. It sources the problem of disability in the body. It measures disability against a theoretical average person, and seeks to make disabled people match that average person more closely. This model works very well for disabled people with disabilities that can be measured, have a potential treatment plan, and want their disability gone. It does not work very well for people who do not match all three criteria. If they match the first and second but not the third, then strict adherents of the medical model often fall back on the moral model, stating that they are stupid, lazy, or selfish for not being interested in being cured. This also often happens if treatment fails to improve the condition of the disabled person.

The social model is a newer model, largely designed by disability activists and scholars and often defined in opposition to the medical model. It sources the problem of disability in the interaction between the disabled person and their physical and social environment. It argues that the solution of disability is to change the environment so that impairments are no longer an issue. This model works very well for disabled people who consider their disability not to be an issue when fully accommodated. It does not work well for people who consider their disability an inherent impairment and/or desire a cure. Strict adherents of the social model often fall back on the moral model when considering these people, stating that they are short-sighted or that they worship the medical model. These are the people who state things such as that depression would not exist in a world without capitalism.

When a disabled person fails to behave as expected by the model a person has of disability, the moral model is almost always the fallback position, because many people cannot conceive of why someone would disagree with them other than a lack of good character. This is a problem, because the moral model proposes no solution but to ignore or abuse the disabled person until they behave as expected.

Another notable interaction is that adherents of the medical model can often be persuaded to support the more traditional parts of the social model, such as providing large text resources to people with impaired vision, so long as there is empirical research backing it. However, they rarely support more radical arguments that challenge how we define disability and how society should be structured or restructured.

All three models have major failure points. The moral model fails every disabled person it is applied to. The medical and social models both fail different disabled people when adhered to strictly. The best approach at the moment seems to be hybridizing the social and medical models, so that they cover each other's weak points and fit the needs of the widest spectrum of disabled people. The main barrier to this is that they are often defined in opposition to each other.

[nightly-valkyrie]

Seems like y'all like wide Kolibri so here she is in action

[thatlittledandere]

Love the product placement in the form of Ryuu's pink Sony Xperia on clear display

[sanasanakun]

Enver Gortash’s eyes represent both the power hungry monster and the traumatized child that lurks beneath his egotistic armor. Certain angles give them a cutting edge that demonstrate the full grip of his tyrannical power. Yet, in other instances, they become soft and boy-like, almost innocent, peeling back the layers to show the young man peeking through. In this essay I will-

[slashthrashandcrash]

Give your thoughts as the resident Legion expert

That was so OP of them. This is also the closest we'll get to blonde Frank.