honestamente, no sé
to prevent confusions i'm giving credits of every fankid in order (starting with the tall one)
layden (fresh x ink fankid) by @/sugary-alienn
dot (cross x ink fankid) by @/yo-honne
abstract (reaper x ink fankid) by CATA-824 on wattpad
gradient (error x ink fankid) by @/askcomboclub
paper jam (error x ink fankid) by @/7goodangel
palette (dream x ink fankid) by @/angeutblogo
blueprint (swap x ink fankid) by @/pepper-mint
aiden (zack x ink fankid) by ariscastleart
477 notes
·
View notes
Hosea and Dutch did good by saving John and Arthur, but that doesn't automatically make them faultless parents.
They molded Arthur and John into ideal outlaws who obeyed them (intentional or not). So much so that BOTH Arthur and John ended up prioritizing the gang over their literal children + the mothers of their children.
Arthur never actually made it out of the outlaw life. John struggled for 8 years trying to leave behind old habits. You cannot tell me that wasn't a direct product of Dutch and Hosea raising them.
I doubt they had any malicious intent, but that doesn't absolve them of everything. I think a big thing rdr fans tend to do is favor intent over the actual results of a character's actions.
It's explicitly clear that the cycle of violence didn't begin with John and proceed with Jack, it began with Hosea and Dutch.
556 notes
·
View notes