#sometimes you have to rant

[megpie71]

Appropriate Surnames, and Aggravating People

I'll be honest enough to admit this article got me good and riled up, mainly because of a lot of what it doesn't say. I will also say their surname is very appropriate (as someone who has recently finished re-reading "Pride and Prejudice" for the nth time). So, rant incoming...

The first thing to note is when well-to-do upper-middle-class Americans start talking about "population", they're generally talking about race. Overpopulation means "there are too many brown people"; underpopulation means "there are not enough white people". This is definitely the case with the Collinses, and the various people who are involved in their "cause". They are proudly conservative right-wing Americans, which means their response to the whole issue of "underpopulation" (as stated previously, "not enough white people") is to urge people like them to breed more and replace the population. Great Replacement thesis, anyone?

I can see why the Collinses put themselves forward as mouthpieces for their movement. To put it bluntly, they're fools and cranks, and they're that particular variety of well-off fool and crank who believes all they have to do is get the rockets off the ground, rather than worry about where they land ('"That's not my department" says Werner von Braun'). They have set off boldly down the road - fixing the potholes they cause is someone else's job. They're also of that particular brand of data-driven fool from the US Tech sector who believes very strongly in the inevitable logic of "the right thing" making its own case. It is notable the one area of data this particular type of data-driven fool never pays attention to is historical data - they borrow from the solipsistic logic of the objectivists and the libertarians there, essentially deciding "history starts today" and refusing to look at what the problems with their solutions (often of the sub-type "simple, cheap and wrong") have been the last few hundred times people have tried them.

What they're describing is the classic upper-middle-class breeding program - people who are wealthy enough to afford children should be having as many of them as possible, people who are too poor to afford children should be breeding so their children can be adopted / fostered by the wealthy upper-middle-classes as an act of charity, and well-to-do white autistic people should definitely be trying to out-breed the neurotypical masses because autism is its own superpower (just look at Elon Musk!).

Sidebar: I am particularly annoyed about the highly-autistic side of this, because quite frankly it is very much a case of "if you have enough money to throw at it, nothing is a disability" - the people who are busy proclaiming autism as a superpower are usually people who were diagnosed young, didn't have particularly severe autism to start with, had all the therapy in the world thrown at them from a very young age, and who have enough money, status, and familial support to be able to set up their lives to work around the constraints their autism places on them. They are able to arrange their worlds to suit them. Nice for them. If you aren't able to arrange the world to work around the constraints of your autism (for example, if you're working class, where you're basically given the options of conform or die) then yes, the same level of autism does become a disability. I'm saying this as a "high-functioning" person who has what's called "category 2" autism here in Australia - even with a good strong social safety net, at least fifty percent of the reason I went to the trouble of getting a diagnosis is so I could get the supports I need, rather than having to struggle all the time and argue uphill against disinterested systems in order to even get my needs recognised.

Anyway, reading about the Collinses is an exercise in the peculiar type of frustration which comes from having to deal with the sort of conservative thinker who doesn't want to see beyond the end of their own arms, and who works very hard to avoid doing so. Mr Collins doesn't believe in funding maternity leave - "The “number one pronatalist policy position,” he tells me, is for governments to make it easier for women to work from home and have flexible hours. The Collinses believe in childcare, but not maternity leave" - which would be fine, except that a lot of the jobs women do (outside Silicon Valley, where they are mentally still resident, even if they're physically living in Pennsylvania) aren't ones which could be done from home. For example: care work - childcare, disability care, elder care, nursing care; teaching; most service jobs - all of these aren't things you can do from home. (Effectively, they're willing to pay for a woman who works in childcare to go to work and care for someone else's children after they've given birth, but they aren't willing to pay for her to have time off to care for her own. It takes a very special type of data-driven thinking to come up with that one).

“Within and between countries, the less money somebody has, the more kids they have. This is a very well-studied phenomenon,”

Yes, it is. The main reason a lot of people in poorer families in poorer countries have lots of kids is because they also have high childhood mortality - you have seven kids in the hope that two will survive to breeding age, and you hope for sons (and expose the daughters) because sons can bring in wealth, while daughters cost money in dowry. In places like the USA, where the social safety net is atrocious, where pregnancy care and post-pregnancy care are expensive, and where sex education consists of "abstinence only", poorer families have larger families for one very straightforward reason: they don't have any options for how not to do so within the income they have.

"Eugenics is state-sponsored selective breeding to influence the dominance of certain genes, he argues. What he and Simone are doing is polygenics, using technology to give parents the choice over which traits they value most."

'It's not eugenics when we're the ones doing it', in other words. It's not eugenics when the government isn't involved.

Mr Collins is, in fact, wrong here. Eugenics, as a philosophy about human breeding, came out of the interpretations of Darwin's work on natural selection done by Darwin's half-cousin, Francis Galton, however it was predated by countless societies where a crude version of population control and santization of the breeding pool was performed by exposing disabled infants (or excess infants from families too poor to support them) to the elements, drowning them in a nearby river, burning them alive in the fire and all the various other means by which infanticide was enacted. Galton, who was a proper Victorian gentleman complete with country estate and so on, was aware of the work being done with selective breeding during the era in order to increase the size of cattle, sheep, pigs etc in order to feed a growing population and felt that this work could also be beneficially applied to humans, to weed out things like hereditary diseases, weakness, and "feeble-mindedness" from the human gene pool. He communicated these ideas to a large number of his like-minded colleagues, via articles such as "Hereditary Talent and Character" and books like "Hereditary Genius" and they gave these ideas the label of "eugenics" (from the Greek term for "good breeding stock") rather than the more blunt Anglo-Saxon of "selective breeding" because snob value (and also good advertising). One of the core ideas behind eugenic thinking can be boiled down to: "the wealthier you are, the better your genes must be".

There is a wealth of social science research out there which proves it's not just the genes, it's all the other little advantages wealth brings with it which work as a cosmic thumb on the scales in favour of the "inevitable" success of the scions of the wealthy. But again, this data and this science isn't of interest to the sort of "data driven" person that Mr and Mrs Collins embody. Funny that.

To be honest, I'm looking forward to the "fifteen years later" follow-up article to this one - because I suspect at least one of the Collins children is going to come right out and say "I was raised in a cult".

[letmetellyouaboutmyfeels]

I am incredibly serious right now when I beg you all, please, and if you have Twitter or Tiktok or whatever to please spread the word: click on an author's profile on Ao3.

You want to know if an author has written more? Want to know if they're still writing? Want to see more from them? Want to know if they've written a trope or kink or sex scenario you enjoy?

Click on their name. And look at their profile.

I cannot tell you how many times in the last six months someone has read a new or newer fic of mine and said they (a new reader who has read nothing else I've done) "can't wait to see what you do next!" I've written 50+ fics and over a million words already.

"I don't know if you're still writing..." click on my profile. I am. I literally wrote a 128k+ fic for that ship last month.

"Would you ever do X?" "Please do Y!" I already did. Click on my name and look at my works.

Archive of our Own is a library. It's an archive. Not social media. It is your responsibility to fight back against the laziness that corporate algorithms have trained into you.

Click my author name. Just click it. Just click it.

Before you demand more, or ask if a writer will do XYZ, or wonder if the author still writing, or anything - click on their profile. Click on the author's profile.

I'm not trying to be mean or condescending or anything like that. I'm just exhausted. It's disheartening and frustrating to repeat myself ad nauseam, because someone couldn't take thirty seconds to do the tiniest bit of work to see if I've written lately, if I've written more for their ship, or scan my works to see if I've written what they're asking for. Please. Please. I'm begging.

Click the author's name, and explore before you ask.

[lygma-nygma]

Being a batfam fan is funny because people will make a post like “here’s my headcanon-“ and it’s just something that’s directly canon to the story then post about major canon events and get everything wrong.

[dani-fox]

DAYILY REMINDER TO THE TF2 FANDOM

Pyro is a grown ass adult.

Pyro is not cannonly a child.

Pyro is a grown adult. who cannonly ran his own business, who suffers from a mental illnesses, and shouldn't be infantlised just because Pyro acts silly.

Pyro can be in a romantic relationship if you want them to be

Pyro can be aroace and not interested in romance and gender if you want them to be

Pyro can be a elderish Abomination if you want it to be

Pyro can be a cis man if you want him to be

Pyro can be a butch lesbian it you want her to be

Pyro can be in a father child relationship with engineer if you want

Just DONT push your ideologies onto others

I've seen so many posts about peaple getting mad at Texas Toast shippers for 'proshipping'

Pyro and Engineer are not cannonly in a father son relationship. Those two are grown consenting non-related adults!

So if you see Pyro and Engineer as family, that's fine just don't go into every goddam Texas Toast comment section and go "Erm actually they are father n son" because no one like you if you do that. That is why you don't get invited to partys Steve! Because you are the fun cops!

Seriously: Just don't do that bullcrap you weirdos. Not everyone thinks like you so just respect their opinion(unless its proshipping. Then don't respect the proshippers)

Thank you for coming to my tedtalk.

[randomalistic]

Wait you guys are actually buying Disney products I thought it was a joke

(READ TAGS FOR FULL CONTEXT Sorry it’s long dies

[alevens]

zolu is maybe one of the easiest ships i've ever liked. they're dating, except when they're not, they're best friends even when they're kissing and they're still captain and first mate when they aren't. they hold hands, they hug. they have sex. they don't.

Luffy can hold Zoro's katanas and Zoro can hold Luffy's strawhat and no one bats an eye. one says "You're so cool!" and the other says "You're strong" and it's just another way to say "I see you, this is why I follow you/this is why I trust you". it's not seeing each other for a long time and still knowing how the other's steps sound like against wood and sand. the captain runs and the first mate follows. it's always "Zoro and the others" and "Where's Luffy?"

if they're just friends, if they're something more, if they don't have a label for it, at its core, it's just about how they get each other. they understand how the other's mind works. however you view them, it doesn't erase they fact that they love each other in a way they don't love other people.

[frownyalfred]

“if readers take the time to leave comments on fics, then authors should at least take the time to reply.”

gently pats you on head. Babe. They already wrote the fic. For free. They gave you thousands of words to be judged and criticized. They don’t owe you anything on top of that.

[valc0]

Gotta be honest, on one hand I appreciate the thought that communities on Tumblr could help artists, writers and fans connect through shared interests. But I'm also worried it will create an insular structure where reaching more people will be near impossible.

Imo, one of the best experiences on Tumblr is seeing people you follow lose their shit over some random show you’ve never heard of and then checking out that show and discover “wow that’s pretty neat!”

I have the feeling this kind of experience will be likely lost if more people start isolating inside thematic communities.

[arcanegifs]

This is the last time I'm going to be annoying about this, I swear.

A few examples of that I, a gifmaker, personally love seeing under the tags:

Analysis of said scene, show, or character, especially the long ones going in depth that span like 1000 words

People saying how crisp the GIFs look and how nice the coloring is THANK YOU. ILY GUYS. That's always huge praise for me.

Reacting with how emotional you got with the scene. How painful and emotional or how touching a scene is.

People making funny jokes, memes, comments, etc.

Literally ppl horny posting LMAO. It's super funny to read and I love seeing all the unhinged comments.

Seeing how much you loved the show and its characters

Things I don't like seeing under the tags. And these are just two very specific things:

How much you hate the show, how much you think a scene is bad, how much you hate a character, the ship, the creators, etc. or how much you dont like this ship anymore, calling a ship horrible because ____ reasons. OKAY! I get it! But I don't want to see that. Make your own hate post on your own blog! You're free to have an opinion on how much you hate something. Just do it on your own blog.

Asking why I leave out certain scenes out, why I decided to gif this scene, or not gif more of these characters. Sometimes, I'm just exhausted. I can overlook things. You guys don't know how draining making gifs can get to me, especially the scenes that are really long. But I do it because I LOVE Arcane, the story, and the characters, and the particular scenes that I make gifs of. I have my own biases too. Of course I’m making them first. Please, just make them yourself instead of complaining under the tags of my edits. Yes, I can see them.

Don’t get me wrong, I wholeheartedly appreciate everyone who supports and follows the blog. I want to make a million more HQ gifs of this amazing show, but sometimes, the very rare negativity can still get overwhelming, to the point where it demotivates you.

Arcane is extremely special to me because it's such a fantastic show, and that alone motivates me in trying to create more GIFs. Honestly, if it was any other fandom or show? I would've probably left already. Arcane is THAT great.

I know the block button is there. I use it too, but sometimes, the amount of effort and time you exert to create FOR FREE just isn’t worth it. And that’s why gifmakers and creators stop making things for fandom. It’s not fun anymore. It’s not worth it.

Some people think that making my style of GIFs is easy. Then great! Since you think so, then do it yourself and help create for the fandom too! I wholeheartedly encourage you to do it!

TLDR: Don't be rude on people's fanwork, especially when they are created FOR FREE. If you don’t like their fanwork, you can make them yourself.

[lobotomy-lady]

I don't care how many times the rich & famous talk about how being rich & famous is the worst fate humanly possible I will never ever ever believe them for one milisecond lol

[marzipanandminutiae]

I miss people using non-medicalized terms for other people's passions

like. well and good to talk about "hyperfixations," "special interests [in the context of an autistic person's favorite subject]," or "infodumping" if you have ADD/ADHD or autism, or are talking about someone who is, but...that's not everyone who feels strongly about something, obsesses, or loves talking about their interests. those words mean specific things, associated with specific forms of neurodivergence

don't assume everyone is comfortable with that language

"rambling" is a word; so is "ranting." "obsession" is a word. "passion" is a word. learn them and use them

[royalarchivist]

[A sad violin song plays over an image of a sad hamster]

Pac: This doesn't have anything to do with me – I wear a blue sweatshirt, you're crazy, this mouse doesn't even have a sweatshirt, this hamster! [Reading chat] Am I a depressed hamster?

[ Transcript continued ↓ ]*

–

Pac: Actually– that's fine! I embrace that idea – of course I'm going to be depressed, are you crazy? [He hits his desk, then starts counting off people on his fingers] Fit is gone, Richarlyson is gone, Ramon is gone, Bagi and Empanada who were always there when we were there are also gone, I haven't seen them! It's just me and Tubbo, and sometimes Philza shows up.

Pac: I lost Chume Labs, I lost the Favela, I lost Murder Mystery, I lost Ilha Chume Labs, it's crazy! Look at how much I've lost, and I've gained nothing! Of course I'm going to be depressed, are you crazy?! How am I supposed to be happy?!

Pac: [Reading chat] "You have us Pac," that's true, thank you. No, that's true, sorry.

* NOTE: Please note that this is an incomplete transcript, as I was primarily relying on Aypierre's translation mod at the time and if I am not confident of the translation, I do not include it. As always, please feel free to add on translations or message me corrections.

[kaleidoscopeminds]

♡ ⋆｡˚ ❀

[chonnysinferno]

the going thru it guy

also somewthing that i cant explain. yea like only one person could get what this is referencing

[uncanny-tranny]

I jokingly thought before that reading Junie B. Jones as a kid turned me into a feminist, but unironically, it kind of did.

I honestly think it comes down to the fact that Junie B. was not only allowed to be "weird," but her character arc never concluded like other girl characters would. In other media featuring "weird girls," the girl always ended her arc tamed - by force or convince, she would be prettied up, she would smile and be polite, and she would never speak out of turn. She would be perfect then, and would shed her veneer of individuality with the freedom that is conformity. As a kid, I noticed that girls weren't permitted to be "weird" like boys were. So when I read Junie B. Jones, I loved that she was frankly just fucking weird. She said things out of turn, she was rambunctious and imaginative and she was a realistic portrayal of a little girl. I loved reading those books because the narrative taught her lessons without punishing her for being weird, if that makes sense. So often, narratives punished weird girls for the crime of being a socially unacceptable girl, not for any true wrongdoing like lying.

Anyway, I just think it's interesting, because I watched and read a ton of books and shows and movies featuring girls and women, but none of them truly empathized with (or even tried to empathize with) weird girls on their own merits and capabilities and terms, or embraced the idea of a "socially inept/unacceptable" girl without punishing her in some way for her supposed ineptitude.

[dayurno]

so sick and tired of people writing fics about jeremy treating kevin like shit over kevin leaving jean at the nest like that is either 1) in character 2) something jean would appreciate or 3) fair. do you even bother to read the books you’re writing fanfic about or is the urge to create cheap angst so overwhelming you can’t see past the tropes you write for every other fictional pairing you like? the idea that jean would appreciate jeremy going out of his way to poke old wounds in his and kevin’s relationship when jean himself does not even like for jeremy to joke about kevin near him is absurd, and that’s without mentioning the fact that jeremy is not so clueless as to think he has any idea of what the nest was like, or why kevin felt he had to leave the way he did. if you need something to make your ship more interesting thinking beyond your flat interpretation of it is a lovely start, but don’t use kevin’s name and storyline if you’re just going to butcher it for the sake of a milquetoast sob fest the characters involved in would not even appreciate