#sistem politic
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
"Diaspora Românească și Miracolul Comodității: Cum Partidele Tradiționale Rămân La Putere, Chiar și Când Lumea le Înjură"
Românii din diaspora continuă să viseze la o schimbare, la un viitor mai prosper și la o politică curată, dar când vine vorba de alegeri, realitatea le dă o palmă. De ce? Pentru că aceia care au fugit din țară în căutarea unui trai mai bun nu înțeleg că, de fapt, schimbarea pe care o doresc rămâne un miraj. În România, PSD și PNL, aceleași partide care de ani buni se joacă de-a „noi vrem…
View On WordPress
#administrație publică#alegeri#alegeri România#alegători#CBCRO#confort#corupție#critică politică#CrossBorderChroniclesRo#cultură politică#diaspora#funcționari publici#influență politică#ironie#paraziți administrativ#partid tradițional#PNL#politică#politică românească#PSD#realitate electorală#România#România balcanică#schimbare#senzațional#sistem politic#speranță#viral
0 notes
Text
My brother wants to become a cop and my parents aren't saying anything about it.
What the fuck am i supposed to do???
#FYI we aren't american#But still being a cop in the current political climate of my country is the worst decision ever#and not only am i worried that something might happen to him#but also that he might find bad influences#he is a good guy#But even the gooddest guy can get crooked by that stupid sistem#not all that is lawful is justice#Acab#tips on how to make him change mind?
0 notes
Text
Pemilu ini adalah pemilu kedua gue nggak berafiliasi ke partai manapun. Tahun 2014, gue masih bergabung dengan harakah yang mengarah ke partai. Tahun 2019 gue sudah berhenti mengikuti harakah tapi gue ngikutin pemilu dengan rasa trauma ke partai berhaluan islam. Mungkin karena komunikasi publiknya partai islam waktu itu kurang baik. Jadi gue ngerasa pengambilan keputusan politik partai tersebut tidak akuntabel dan cenderung memaksakan taklid buta.
Tahun ini, semuanya dimulai dengan sikap netral, lebih tenang dan lebih objektif. Udah nggak ada rasa trauma ataupun rasa fanatik ke pihak manapun. Lebih ke ngerasa lega karena udah pelan-pelan mengenal diri sendiri. Semacam:
"Oh ini toh value yang gue pegang ketika sendirian?"
Tahun 2014, circle gue adalah orang-orang yang mendukung Prabowo. Tapi gue milih menggunakan hak suara tanpa memilih presiden dan nggak berkoar-koar karena menghormati orang-orang di sekitar gue. Meskipun pada waktu itu, gue juga sempat membantu mengawal suara. Tapi rasanya masih nggak sreg dan mengalami kebingungan untuk mengambil keputusan. Konon prinsip dasar fiqih memang mengajarkan memilih yang mudharatnya paling rendah. Akan tetapi waktu itu gue merasa semuanya satu toko cuma beda pintu aja. Jadi bagi gue, milih yang manapun akan sama. Tahun 2019, masih sama. Masih bingung juga. Nggak mantep buat milih. Hari ini, gue udah nggak merasa bingung karena dua hal:
Para capres – cawapres menggunakan pendekatan kampanye yang berbeda. Gue punya banyak chanel untuk mempelajari visi dan misi cawapres. Jadi meskipun visi – misinya tidak sempurna, setidaknya arahnya bisa dibaca.
Ada banyak chanel dari lembaga independent yang membedah visi dan misi capres sesuai dengan kepakarannya. Contohnya Green Peace yang berfokus membahas isu lingkungan. Dari situ gue jadi paham capres mana yang menjaga lingkungan dan capres mana yang visi-misinya sangat ekstraktif.
Meskipun di belakang dua hal yang gue sebut tadi masih ada gerbong oligarki yang perlu dianalisa lagi, tapi setidaknya asas yang gue pakai bukan lagi asas lesser evil atau yang mudhorotnya paling minim. Dalam pemilu kali ini, gue memilih paslon karena keinget hadist:
"Jika kiamat hendak terjadi dan di tangan kalian ada biji tumbuhan, maka jika kalian sanggup menanamnya sebelum benar-benar terjadi kiamat, lakukanlah”. HR. Ahmad No. 12981
Segelap apapun sistem yang kita hadapi, jika kita melihat potensi kebaikan di depan mata, mari kita rawat potensi tersebut sambil banyak berdoa. Semoga kebaikan tersebut tumbuh dengan baik. Gue nggak melihat pemilu ini sebagai satu momen saja. Sebagai bagian dari masyarakat, gue melihat pemilu sebagai tolak ukur kecerdasan komunal kita. Mana celah yang perlu banget kita perbaiki. Mana kebaikan yang perlu kita syukuri.
Ketika bicara kecerdasan komunal, gue nggak mengacu pada secanggih apa teknologi yang kita punya. Tapi lebih pada bagaimana kita punya perangkat budaya yang menumbuhkan sekaligus memberi rasa aman kepada semua orang termasuk masyarakat lemah dan rentan hingga manusia yang paling miskin pun tetap bisa hidup dan bertumbuh dengan baik sebagai manusia. Punya waktu untuk berpikir. Bisa belajar untuk menjadi lebih baik.
Gue nggak bilang orang-orang miskin nggak bisa bertumbuh jadi manusia dan orang kaya pasti bisa jadi manusia yang baik. Tapi tiap gue ngelihat kehidupan kita sekarang, ada banyak skenario yang memungkinkan manusia tidak bisa bertumbuh dengan baik. Contoh sederhana:
Ada masyarakat menengah yang terjebak kemacetan setiap hari cukup lama sehingga waktu bersama keluarga mereka berkurang. Setiap harinya diberatkan dengan urusan-urusan keuangan. Boro-boro upgrade diri. Otak nggak pernah tenang dan semuanya dihadapi dengan survival mode.
Sama halnya dengan yang miskin. Pendidikan tinggi nggak aksesibel. Ruang hidupnyapun bisa terancam sewaktu-waktu. Belum lagi jika kita melakukan gaslighting dan menertawakan orang-orang yang saking lamanya hidup di survival mode sampai money politics pun kerasa gampang banget masuk ke mereka.
Ini celah peradaban kita. Setiap kali mendesain dunia dalam game, gue selalu berpikir masyarakat seperti apa yang ada di sana? Disiplin ilmu seperti apa yang tumbuh di dalamnya? Apakah mereka punya sistem pemerintahan yang egaliter dan stabil? Jika kita ingin sistem yang egaliter dan stabil, kita harus bagaimana?
Sama halnya dengan dunia nyata. Meskipun variabel bebasnya jauh lebih banyak ketimbang di game, tapi gue belajar juga buat berpikir secara sistem. Let’s say gue muslim yang pengen berkontribusi ke masyarakat dengan warna keislaman gue, gue harus belajar apa agar tidak terjebak ke fanatik buta? Waktu baca buku The Art of Thinking Clearly, gue jadi nyadar bahwa skeptis sama keadaan itu tidak buruk. Justeru kita harus terus menerus skeptis dan kritis sampai kita bisa berpikir dengan jernih. Membedakan mana kekhawatiran yang beneran khawatir, mana kekhawatiran yang dipicu trauma. Lalu menganalisa kekhawatiran tersebut sampai nemu akar masalahnya.
Yang gue khawatirkan hari ini ada banyak. Utamanya karena gue akademisi. Gue khawatir kalau pendidikan tinggi makin susah dijangkau. Kita tahu dengan berubahnya perguruan tinggi jadi PTN-BH, perguruan tinggi seperti punya dua peran sekaligus. Punya peran sosial dengan meringankan UKT Masyarakat miskin sekaligus jadi perusahaan yang dituntut banyak cuan. Padahal skill set dosen atau leader di setiap kampus tuh nggak banyak yang mengarah ke entrepreneurship. Lagi pula membangun Perusahaan itu ya nggak semudah yang kita bayangkan. Pada akhirnya, ada banyak kampus yang masih bergantung pada UKT sebagai sumber pendapatan utama.
Kedua? Gue khawatir kalau ruang hidup Masyarakat rentan tergerus. Pengen menulis ini lebih panjang tapi kok nggak nyaman wkwk. Sebenarnya kekalahan paslon yang gue pilih tuh udah terlintas di benak gue setelah membaca banyak prediksi dan melihat data demografi di Indonesia. Gue nggak pengen nyalahin masyarakat rentan. Nggak pengen menyalahkan akademisi yang dianggap hanya duduk di menara gading.
Akademisi kita sebenarnya sudah banyak yang berjuang. Kalau dibilang “bahasa yang digunakan terlalu intelek dan ndakik-ndakik”, gue sendiri nggak sependapat. Kita kadang-kadang perlu belajar mencerna informasi yang kompleks. Nggak boleh juga kita merendahkan: “Masyarakat kelas bawah pasti nggak mampu ngerti”
Arah jangan begitu. Kalau pakar menjelaskan dengan bahasa yang kompleks, jurnalis yang perlu mengolah biar bahasanya lebih dipahami khalayak. Salah satu hal yang perlu diperbaiki di peradaban kita hari ini adalah jurnalismenya. Keberpihakan kepada Masyarakat rentan belum menjadi arus utama di media.
Meskipun hari ini pola kampanye dialogis masih belum bisa membuat para paslon menang, gue tetap bersyukur. Bagaimanapun pemaparan visi dan misi adalah sesuatu yang perlu diapresiasi.
Sisanya?
Hidayah itu ada yang tiba-tiba datang ke hati manusia. Ada yang datangnya memang perlu dijemput atau dikondisikan. Dengan menata pola pikir Masyarakat, berarti kita membantu memudahkan banyak orang untuk mendapatkan hidayah. Menata pola pikir masyarakat itu bukan memaksakan mereka mengikuti pola pikir kita. Tetapi lebih ke bagaimana kita mengembangkan instrument budaya yang memberi ruang untuk berpikir, membantu masyarakat untuk memperkecil bias, hingga orang yang bisa berpikir jernih semakin banyak. Kita tidak akan bisa sampai pada ketaatan selevel nabi Ayyub A.S. Tapi gue berharap seberapapun miskinnya kita, semoga Allah tetap mendekatkan kita pada kebenaran dan memampukan kita untuk memperjuangkan hal-hal baik.
Gue paham banget bahwa kemiskinan itu membatasi banyak hal. Termasuk imajinasi. Di negara kita, kemiskinan bahkan menghambat manusia meraih pendidikan dan pekerjaan yang layak. Maka jihad-jihad kita tuh selain bikin kajian tentang hal dasar beragama, kita juga perlu membentuk masyarakat yang melek undang-undang dan hak mereka. Paham negara ini harus diarahkan kemana. Paham betapa dampak kota car-centric terhadap kemanusiaan. Paham gimana dampaknya RUU Ciptaker. Beneran. Pemahaman tentang hal-hal semacam ini tuh juga bis akita sebut hidayah. Karena apapun yang bisa memberi kita inspirasi untuk menjauhkan manusia dari keburukan dan mendekatkan manusia pada kebaikan, bisa kita sebut hidayah.
Mungkin kita akan menghadapi musim dingin beberapa waktu. Tapi semoga Allah menjaga kita semua. Semoga kelak kita bisa bernegara dengan lebih baik. Bertumbuh, sejahtera dan punya banyak resource untuk berbuat baik :")
117 notes
·
View notes
Text
second year, first semester, sociology classes:
cultural anthropology
We are learning the main anthropological theories and the role of anthropology in the human/social sciences field, while keeping a critical eye when it comes to the relationship between anthropology and colonialism.
social statistics
This class focuses on the basis of statistics, with specific reference to applications in sociology. We are also learning to make statistic analisis with Excel and Stata.
basics of economics
A very interesting class in which we are learning the classical theories of political economy alongside with the civil economy's pov, which aknowledges the social and enviromental issues of the market sistem.
economic and labor sociology
This class is about the most significant sociological theories regarding economic themes, the main topic is the welfare sistem (different kinds of sistems, how they impact society, how are they able to keep working etc.)
#studyblr#realistic studyblr#study blog#uni life#study inspiration#study motivation#studyspo#student#studyblr community#study plan
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
@professorlehnsherr-almashy @choster33 @a-roguish-gambit @voxxgrimly @magnetostits @blade-liger-4ever @thealmightyemprex @the-blue-fairie @themousefromfantasyland @thevulturesquadron @countesspetofi
Sometimes I think what could have been ...
I see the comics history of the character Wanda Maximoff, and how much potential it had to be an interesting commentary about assimilation:
This young woman, persecuted both for being romani, and for being a mutant, once accepted alongside her brother Pietro to briefly join the Brotherhood of (Evil) Mutants led by Magneto out of personal gratitude for him saving their lives from an angry mob.
Then, feeling the dept is payed, and wanting to be seen as a legitimate hero by american society, Wanda leaves the Brotherhood, taking Pietro with her to join, not the X-Men, whose public status as heros is under constant scrutiny by society, but the Avengers, a group that is considered more respectable, and focuses mainly in defeating super villains with the batom of the Goverment, but hasn't really a strong, consistent stance about supporting mutant rights (some of its members even spouting anti mutant bigotry).
Wanda and Pietro are "the good ones" who don't demand mutant rights and never get involved in direct activism, but rather "want to pull up themselves by their own booth straps".
The two later learn that Magneto is their biological father, and is trying to come closer to them, while also caring for the fate of mutantkind, Pietro slowly gets more involved by joining mutant team X-Force, but Wanda sees most of that from a distance.
When she falls in love and gets married to Vision, the place the two go to live after retiring from the Avengers are the suburbs, the quintessential simbol of the American Dream Family.
Then, the couple splits bitterly, the two children they had together are said to be an illusion, and this badly affects Wanda's mental health.
The characters who are part of the Avengers and the X-Men debate how to deal with her.
Encouraged by Pietro, Wanda uses her powers to create an alternate reality where the wishes of several characters are real.
But those characters soon learn that this isn't reality, including Magneto, who is among many to question Wanda about trapping people in an illusion of her making, and when she reacts angrily about it, trowing years of bitterly feeling that her father's cause is what made him an absent, flawed father for her and Pietro, she doesn't target him directly: she depowers millions of mutant kind with just saying "No More Mutants", both as a cruel way to respond against her father, but also out of a never worked internalized hatred of being a mutant, who tried to be away of politics regarding mutantkind, desperate to assimilate into a respectable, suburban american, one of the "good ones" that never protests, who, having that dream painfully taken from her, instead of focusing her anger at the sistem (and Mephisto) that caused this to happen to her, targets her own kind in a personal revenge, and will have to slowly work to find where she belongs in the world, and wheter or not she is a good person ...
This could be an interesting, meaningful arc with a logical narrative path if all the writers, editors and artists agreed to sit together in a room and work in a linear continuity since the characters creation, considering the implications of every narrative choice they make, but apparently that is to much to ask.
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
Seeing gay people talking tons of shi* about Red White And Royal Blue and Heartstopper in name of " is only my opinion " makes me wanna throw up sincerely because those kind of media are created for make gay people felt hopeful and joyful in a world like that and because some of us growed up without a good representation,
Especially if those gay boys / men are living in a toxic environment and can't live a comfortable life with the ones they love
so please I politely ask you ❤ 🤍 💙:
FUCK YOU AND YOUR FUCKED UP BITTER OPINIONS, LET GAY PEOPLE ( ESPECIALLY GAY YOUNG BOYS ) HAVE A FUCKING DAY OF PEACE AND HAPPINESS IN THAT FUCKED UP SISTEM WE ALL LIVE FOR GOD SAKE ! ! ! !
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
I dont get political on this is app but I just wanna say my heart breaks to see America fail its people I hope that one day they will realise that women,children are indgared now more then ever and that lgbtq+,minorty groups bring a lot to Americas sistem and to you American citisens i wish you better days and better future then this you have my love care and compassion beacuse this isnt right.
With love from Europe
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Eurovision 2005: The Scoreboards
This year's scoreboard is an unfussy affair. The graphics are utilitarian - back to the spreadsheet chic of 2000 albeit with little wormholes in the graphics for the spokesperson and the voting country's flag.
There's no room for the hearts of last year, this is a scoreboard that means business and promises no messing about, let's get straight to the results. Of course, the voting sequence takes just as long as it always does with the same tomfoolery from all taking part.
For the semi-final there is one small innovation. The envelopes are still present with the names of the countries who've qualified for the final, however this time as the hosts randomly select envelopes the successful acts are added to the running order of the final sequentially.
The first drawn country gets the first available slot. If you're drawn first, you have the relief of knowing you're through, but you get an early draw - possibly even the death slot! If you're last out, then you've had a minor heart attack, but you get the prime later running order slots. Genius!
It's 2005 Spoiler Time!
The ten countries that qualified are (in a very particular order):
Romania - 235 points
Moldova (on their debut!) - 207 points
Denmark - 185 points
Croatia - 169 points
Hungary (on their return!) - 167 points
Norway - 164 points
Israel - 158 points
Switzerland - 114 points
North Macedonia - 97 points
Latvia - 85 points
Poland missed out by only four points in eleventh place. This is also probably the place to point out that the two smallest countries taking part, Monaco and Andorra finished second-bottom and third-bottom in an televote semi-final. For countries without large diasporas or huge numbers of neighbourly friends, it would appear that the televote has drawbacks.
As is going to become the norm, the points scored were revealed only after the grand final. The contents of the envelopes were the only place I noticed where the heart symbol appeared this year - the flags were printed inside hearts on those cards.
In the grand final, once again, the voting sequence was not that tense. At around the halfway mark, there was no clear leader, in fact the country that qualified from the semi-final in tenth place, Latvia, was leading but after that, Greece slowly pulled away. The result was obvious a long way from the end.
Although there were no nul points this year, there is one glaring aspect of the final scoreboard to address. The bottom five places were occupied by the host country and the Big Four. In fact, of the bottom twelve in the voting, that is the entire right-hand side of the scoreboard, eleven of them hadn't performed in the semi-final. Is this a new and perhaps unexpected aspect of the semi-final system? It's something to keep an eye-on. It's not going to stop some commentators yelling it's all about politics though.
Here's the full rundown of the 2005 Eurovision final scores:
Greece - Helena Paparizou - "My Number One" - 230 points
Malta - Chiara - "Angel" - 192 points
Romania - Luminița Anghel and Sistem - "Let Me Try" - 192 points
Israel - Shiri Maimon - "HaSheket SheNish'ar" - 154 points
Latvia - Walters and Kazha - "The War Is Not Over" - 153 points
Moldova - Zdob și Zdub - "Boonika bate doba" - 148 points
Serbia and Montenegro - No Name - "Zauvijek moja" - 137 points
Switzerland - Vanilla Ninja - "Cool Vibes" - 128 points
Norway - Wig Wam - "In My Dreams" - 125 points
Denmark - Jakob Sveistrup - "Talking to You" - 125 points (joint 9th)
Croatia - Boris Novković feat. Lado members - "Vukovi umiru sami" - 115 points
Hungary - Nox - "Forogj, világ" - 97 points
Türkiye - Gülseren - "Rimi Rimi Ley" - 92 points
Bosnia and Herzegovina - Feminnem - "Call Me" - 79 points
Russia - Natalia Podolskaya - "Nobody Hurt No One" - 57 points
Albania - Ledina Çelo - "Tomorrow I Go" - 53 points
North Macedonia - Martin Vučić - "Make My Day" - 52 points
Cyprus - Constantinos Christoforou - "Ela Ela" - 46 points
Sweden - Martin Stenmarck - "Las Vegas" - 30 points
Ukraine - GreenJolly - "Razom nas bahato"- 30 points (joint 19th)
Spain - Son de Sol - "Brujería" - 28 points
United Kingdom - Javine - "Touch My Fire" - 18 points
France - Ortal - "Chacun pense à soi" - 11 points
German - Gracia - "Run & Hide" - 4 points
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Money Politic itu Ngga Normal
Kalau mau yang bener2 bersih, idealis, mah, susah. Wong voters nya aja, yang begitu berharga suaranya, dikasih serangan aja diterima. Ya, kita artinya masih dalam kendali sistem kotor para penguasa berduit. Yang eksekutif dengan kekuasaan dan kebijakan, yang legislatif dengan bagi2 duit, sembako, bantuan sosial lainnya. Kebiasaanya sih begitu. Sudah rahasia umum, bukan?
Jadi jangan terlalu berekspektasi tinggi, sampai bela mati, tutup mata. Mau itu tentang pribadinya, partainya, mau eksekutif ataupun legislatif. Susah mah politik siapa yang mau dipercaya.
Sekarang kita yang millenial ini yang harus siapin generasi alpa dengan sebaik mungkin dan memutus pola2 curang, kotor tak beradab, tak sesuai norma. Susah sih. Butuh banyak orang. Tinggal mau berubah atau nggak. Dari diri sendiri, ke lingkungan terkecil keluarga, saudara, tetangga, RT, desa, dst. Yang paling berat ya dimulai dari diri sendiri.
Politik itu kan seni. Seni merayu dan mememengaruhi orang lain untuk mendapatkan legitimasi. Bisa memengaruhi keluarga aja, kita sudah berpolitik. Nah dimulai dengan politik yang bersih dan baik.
Belajar mulai dari diri sendiri untuk tidak menormalisasikan hal-hal yang memang ngga normal. Jangan hanya sekadar dilakukan banyak orang jadi dinormalkan, padahal tidak sesuai dengan hukum dan norma. Berani berbeda untuk hal yang benar memang challenging.
Semangat diri menormalisasikan yg benar. Bukan menormalisasikan yang banyak dilakukan mayoritas orang.
#opiniiffa#iffanf#politik#pemilu#prabowo gibran#anies muhaimin#ganjar mahfud#money politik#money politic#politik uang
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
this might be a bit silly as nor can anyone here do anything about it and mostly likely neither sharing can just sharing it, but anyways
it's been a couple days, but every year during may and june i find myself unable to keep my mind off it
this past june 5th marked 14 years of the tragedy of the ABC daycare here in Sonora. 49 children died in a fire and several (between 80 and 120, depending on who you ask) are still suffering the consequences of the disaster.
it is well known, locally, that not only was this preventable, but was directly caused bc people in the govt decided it wasn't important to make sure the warehouse they had right behind said daycare was safe, or even up to code.
to this day, no one has been punished. again and again the families of the victims have marched, begging for anything to be done about it bc a tragedy of such magnitud should not go unpunished, yet nothing has been done.
there's signs about it everywhere. every single day since then the people responsible for it drive by the symbolic tombs plastered with the faces of the 49 babies that were killed due to their negligence, and they still haven't moved a finger.
there's so much i could say about it.
how it was just across the street from the building many of their parents worked in.
how their parents had to see the fire eating the building their children were in and not be able to do anything about it.
how they had just installed, in a building with no emergency exits, a new double door safety sistem that made it impossible to get out because you couldn't open both doors at the same time.
how the only reason why so many children survived was that a man rammed his truck against a wall and made a way for the teachers to get the children out.
how the government had been told very recently that the warehouse was a fire risk and the daycare building was not safe for either the children or workers, yet decided to keep operations open in both of them.
how you couldn't hear the cries of the children over the screaming of their parents outside the building.
how the building had not only polyurethane ceilings, but also plastic sheet and fabric covering its walls, which only helped the fire spread faster.
how the daycare didn't had a single smoke detector or fire extinguisher, and most of the children suffocated to death.
how only four years later we learnt that ABC and many other operating daycares subrogated by IMSS (Mexican Institute of Social Security) are owned directly and indirectly by families with political power (ABC owned particularly by Marcia Matilde Altagracia Gómez del Campo, cousin of Margarita Zavala, then Mexico's First Lady and currently Deputy of the Congress).
#abc tragedy#children death#sorry for long belated post. it has very little relevance for yall but i felt the need to talk about it#i was gonna make a formal + more articulate post in the other blog but i haven't had the energy to do so#and didn't wish to postpone it any longer
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Made me want to learn everything about politics before the elections this year bc if I don't know shit about these people and sistem why tf am I even voting
god. it’s just. it’s dreams by the cranberries. it’s the montage of them all voting yes. it’s orla’s little smiley face in the box. it’s the live footage of the troubles. it’s erin’s speech. it’s the way that the last shot is of grandpa joe and anna jumping together out of the voting hall. it’s the sheer symbolism of youth and age being joyful and hopeful together. god.
14K notes
·
View notes
Text
”Cel ce gândește câștigă”. Este motto-ul unei echipe detestate din cadrul unui serviciu secret. Israelul și-a dat seama repede că nu poate supraviețui gândind dogmatic. După războiul Yom Kippur, directoratul de inteligență al IDF a format o grupare independentă numită Echipa Roșie sau informal ”Ipcha Mistabra”, o expresie aramaică ce s-ar traduce în ”Ba Dimpotrivă”. Menirea aceste echipe era să se opună ortodoxiei ideologice din aparatul birocratic israelian. Să culeagă informații fără restricții și să facă analize care să contrazică concluziile majorității. Analiștii echipei ”Ba Dimpotrivă” erau însărcinați să ocolească ierarhia, să submineze analitic și să demoleze gândirea doctrinară a Statului Major, fără repercusiuni. Raporta direct ministrului apărării și primului ministru, spre disperarea celorlalte servicii.
Echipa Roșie este cel mai util departament al unei structuri de inteligență. Declinul și prăbușirea oricărui sistem politic sunt facilitate de faptul că toată lumea ajunge să gândească la fel, propagă orice eroare logică mai departe, iar cei ce contestă ortodoxia sunt aspru pedepsiți, chiar dacă sunt loiali. Menirea unei astfel de echipe este să fie Avocatul Diavolului și să prezinte conducerii o perspectivă fundamental diferită, ancorată strict în realitate, dincolo de dogmă, de ideologia patriotardă sau irațională ce capătă prevalență în orice aparat birocratic. Psihicul uman este tot un aparat birocratic extrem de stufos care se învelește frecvent cu pătura dogmatică pentru a putea supraviețui relativ confortabil. Oamenii nu vor să se schimbe pentru că presupune efort, iar schimbările pot fi dureroase. Dar, după cum au realizat foarte repede israelienii, confortul și siguranța sunt deseori aparente. Faptul că o birocrație nu vede că a comis o greșeală, nu înseamnă că greșeala nu există. Ba dimpotrivă, garantează că se va repeta. La nivel mental ne trebuie tuturor o echipă adversă care să ne conteste dogma din când în când. Trebuie să facem mereu exercițiul ”Ba Dimpotrivă”.
Absolut toate problemele de pe planeta asta sunt de natură practică. Abordarea ideologică este mereu o greșeală pentru că nu există soluții ideologice la probleme practice. Nu poți opri prăbușirea unui perete doar crezând cu suficientă tărie că nu se va prăbuși. Oricâte argumente ai aduce în fața lui, până nu aduci mortar, cărămizile tot la pământ vor ajunge. Nu sunt elitist și nu mă distanțez de oameni în funcție de cum votează, dar mă distanțez în funcție de cum își argumentează ideile și deciziile. Detest gândirea dogmatică. Prefer opiniile personale greșite decât mura în gură luată de la alții. Respect autenticitatea, fie ea și în prostie. În viață este mult mai bine să fii un prost original, decât un idiot de fabricația altora. De asemenea prefer mai degrabă proștii autentici decât ticăloșii interesați. Acestea fiind spuse, dacă opiniile voastre sunt mereu aceleași, fundamentate pe scriitura acelorași propagandiști, am vești proaste. Nu sunteți liber-cugetători, ci membrii unui cult. Mai ales că în ultimii ani s-au aflat lucruri cutremurătoare care au schimbat contextul multor evenimente sau au demolat efectiv narativele oficiale. Contextul tuturor evenimentelor se schimbă mereu. Periodic aflăm lucruri noi. Realitatea e mereu în flux și nu se pretează la concluzii împietrite în timp. Faptul că aceste lucruri noi nu sunt distribuite de prelații ortodoxiei doctrinare, nu înseamnă că ele nu există, decât pentru congregația de idioți pe care au reușit să o hipnotizeze. Pentru mine sunteți doar victimele programării.
Pur și simplu nu ai scuză, în 2024, să vii cu aceleași trei analize de căcat, scrise de ministerul toroipanelor care acum își luxează tendoanele încercând să-și recapete echidistanța și credibilitatea distrusă. Trebuie să ai memoria unui caras auriu ca să uiți ce grosolănii halucinante au susținut vectorii ăștia în ultimii ani. Absolut toate predicțiile lor au fost eronate, ceea ce ar trebui să vă dovedească instant că ei cred totul cu tărie, dar nu știu nimic. Și-au încărcat rândurile cu atâtea minciuni toxice pentru societate încât le trosnește credibilitatea sub ele și li se prăbușesc audiențele. Și n-au făcut-o pentru că erau ei proști autentici sau creduli. Asta aș fi putut înțelege și respecta. Au făcut-o pentru că au fost plătiți din fonduri deblocate de către guverne, special pentru propagandă ideologică. Au făcut-o pe nervii și pe banii voștri. Zeloții mureau de foame în piața liberă dacă nu-i susținea oligarhia prin contractele cu presa și micile ciupeli de care beneficiază prin ONG-uri sau când sunt invitați la emisiuni. Ăștia cântau la pian de piept în gară dacă nu erau săltați artificial de aparatul de stat și de algoritmii social media.
Dacă votați sau vă trăiți viața pentru că așa v-a convins un individ care scrie de zece ani același lucru și nu se adeverește niciodată, sunteți la fel ca secta aia apocaliptică ce tot modifică data la care trebuie să vină extratereștrii ca să-i ridice în spațiu. Vă compătimesc sincer, dar prezența voastră mă întristează suficient încât să vreau să vă evit. Informarea nu se face din șase articole care au toate aceeași concluzie identică, ci din șase păreri fundamental diferite. Nu volumul de argumente identice crește calitatea argumentației. De asemenea, părerile fundamental diferite nu sunt dușmanul. Nicio părere nu poate schimba o realitate obiectivă, ci doar contribuie cu alte unghiuri la perspectivă. Când toți oamenii din jur vă spun exact același lucru, nu sunteți într-un grup, ci într-o sectă. Fugiți mâncând pământul! Nu contează că sunt de stânga sau dreapta. Că bula lor e cea mai frumoasă. Toate sectele se jură că sunt cele mai bune, alea adevărat credincioase. Dacă vă periați orgoliile confirmând că votați cu X pentru că așa scriu influencerii voștri favoriți, nu există nicio diferență între voi și babele care votau cu Iliescu pentru că așa a spus la televizor. Dacă vă planificați viața și spațiul mental în funcție de argumentele grupului, sunteți doar șoimi ai patriei. Nici nu înțelegeți cine sau de ce v-a adunat în careu. A zis tovarășa învățătoare să fiți acolo la ora opt și v-ați prezentat cuminței, ca să nu vă confiște cravata de pionier care vă confirma identitatea în cadrul grupului.
Mă gândesc că majoritatea oamenilor sunt dispuși să facă orice numai ca să nu-și recunoască faptul că au fost niște cultiști proști. Inclusiv să-i pedepsească pe alții nevinovați pentru asta. Din păcate nu-i puteți răzgândi pentru că proștii pot ierta aproape orice, mai puțin faptul că ați avut dreptate. Sunt dispuși să ignore absolut orice, să accepte orice compromis moral, numai ca să nu admită că au fost vreodată de partea greșită. E și asta o metodă de a supraviețui, voi să fiți sănătoși, dar este un stil de viață incompatibil cu principiile mele. Așa că votați cu cine credeți. Trăiți cum vă place și cum puteți. Atâta doar că, atunci când vă solidificați deciziile pe argumentele altora care sunt ticăloși sau idioți dovediți, ne despărțim prieteni. Preferam să știu ce gândiți voi de capul vostru, chiar dacă ar fi fost ”greșit”, să zicem, decât să aflu că un zelot v-a spus cum să gândiți și nu vreți să pierdeți legitimația de acces în templu. Tot ce vă trece pe lângă urechi, în viața asta, trebuie trecut imediat prin filtrul ”Ba Dimpotrivă”. Când închideți departamentul ăsta mental, de dragul altora, ați fost colonizați intelectual definitiv. Puteți să vă cumpărați rochii albe și să vă mutați în deșert cu ăia care așteaptă extratereștrii. Cică vin acușica.
0 notes
Text
Jansen Sarankan Pemerintah Fokus Bikin "Anti Virus" Money Politic
JAKARTA – Wasekjen DPP Partai Demokrat, Jansen Sitindaon menilai bahwa persoalan besar dalam Kepemiluan sebenarnya bukan pada sistem yang dipakai. Ia melihat berdasarkan pengalaman yang dialami Indonesia dalam pelaksanaan politik elektoral, masalah utamanya adalah money politic (politik uang). “Masalahnya menurutku bukan di sistemnya, tapi politik uang-nya. Mau di sistem apa pun kalau politik…
0 notes
Text
Narîșkin a vorbit despre eșecurile SUA în spațiul post-sovietic
Directorul Serviciului rus de Informații Externe (SVR), Serghei Narîșkin, a declarat într-un interviu acordat revistei Razvedchik că autoritățile americane pierd inițiativa pe toate fronturile și eșuează în spațiul post-sovietic. Georgiana Arsene În același timp, „obsesia” americană pentru Ucraina începe să aibă un efect devastator asupra întregului sistem financiar și militar-politic global…
0 notes
Text
this is a very dark page for my country, but no surprising. even if only the latest government is a self declared fascist one, fascism never left our parliament. it kept quite for the most part of the post war, but in the last three decades it creepily crawled back into society and politic, masquerading as paladin of the "oppressed" people (and then it turned out they were more crooked of all the others put together, but this is another topic).
what all these fascists have always failed to understand (besides human decency) is that at sea there's a different law: the international maritime code.
whoever notices people in difficulties (not just in deathly danger) or receive a distress signal of any kind, they are obliged to provide assistance.
also, the EU laws about rescuing refugees at sea, establish that they have to be taken to the nearest safe port.
"safe port" doesn't mean just any port with food and water, but safe for the people. if you know that bringing them to Libya will results in torture and death for the outrageous crime of not wanting to live there anymore, you just can't do it (also, this is the part that any fascists will never understand, which involves human decency).
unfortunately, Italy has some weight to pull around the Mediterranean and the EU, that's why some ports started to be less cooperating with the ONGs (Malta). plus, we're not the only fascist country, and if you google around you can easily find all the others that tried to pull away from their duty to take care of all these poor people along with us (or put out shameful rules for entering their borders).
at the process, they hope to demonstrate that the ONGs were working with the traffickers and not because they actually care about human beings (for one, they cannot understand that, and for two, they're still using that shameful tactic of making the immigrants the scapegoat of most of our country problems. because, you know, we do not have one of the most crooked politicians in EU, mafia infiltrated everywhere, rich people evading taxes, etc. it's all fault of these damn immigrants that came here to be pampered and sustained by our taxes! some of them were elected specifically because they promised to stop the migrants flux. the only thing they accomplished was to increase the death count. people are still landing on Lampedusa. they're just not telling it and instead advertise how hard they're making for the ONGs to do their job).
all this is bullshit, of course, but trying to speak to the mind of the people is way more difficult that their belly (it's an Italian way to say). the mind doesn't want to be put in the condition of realizing how wrong (and cruel) you have been, or just put the effort to understand and investigate things a bit (yes, 10 mins of googling and reading is too much for most people...). also, most of the people that tried to counter all that BS did it in a patronizing way and/or speaking the higher class language. you can't go and say half of Italy is stupid, of course they will not listen to you (I would have not either). also, speak as you eat (another Italian idiom).
if you say to the belly: you cannot have your tax cut because we have to feed all this immigrant that came here with the idea to be parasites, definitely not because we keep cutting taxes for the rich and speculating on everything we can put our hands on, the belly will react as predicted. brewing hate for people that they never met, see or even glanced at. and it will follow anybody that promise a quick solution: "everyone out! Italian first!".
also, our school system has been sistemically dismantled since the 90s, plus the constant increase of the cost of living not match
till now, all their alleged proofs already turned out to be BS so I'm not very worried. the backslash though will be a bloodbath.
“Let us put it generally: if a regime is immoral, its citizens are free from all obligations to it.” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Gulag Archipelago.
[Pictured: Captain Pia Klemp sitting in a chair beside her controls.
@VivianAngrisani on Twitter wrote on 6/8/2019: “Pia Klemp, a German biologist & boat captain faces 20 yrs in prison for rescuing 1,000+ migrants at risk of drowning whilst crossing the Mediterranean. Seeking asylum is a human right. Only 1 in 100 sea captains are female. This woman is a humanitarian, not a criminal. #FreePia”
@Galactic_Rabbit quote-tweeted on 6/10/2019 and wrote: “Thinking about all those videos of people honored in their old age for hiding/protecting Jewish people.”]
190K notes
·
View notes
Text
Quick Count Pilkada 2024: Real-Time Insights and How to Stay Updated
The Pilkada (regional elections) 2024 in Indonesia has garnered widespread attention, with quick counts serving as a popular method for preliminary results. Quick counts provide near-real-time insights based on sample data from polling stations, offering a snapshot of election outcomes before official tallies are completed.
Understanding Quick Counts
Quick counts differ from exit polls as they rely on actual vote data from polling stations rather than interviews with voters. Accredited survey institutions conduct these counts, ensuring a high level of accuracy and transparency. For example, Litbang Kompas reported quick count results with 42% of data processed for West Java, a critical province in this election
Read more on Google News
Tools for Monitoring Results
The KPU’s (General Elections Commission) Real Count system is another tool for real-time election updates. Sirekap, the KPU’s digital tool, is utilized to verify and publish results directly from polling stations. Although past technical challenges have been noted, the system has been improved for the 2024 elections, ensuring greater reliability
For those interested in detailed live updates, major media outlets such as Kompas, CNN Indonesia, and Tempo provide continuous coverage. Links to their platforms offer accessible, up-to-date quick count information across various regions
Key Takeaways
Transparency and Speed: Quick counts are crucial for early result indications while waiting for KPU’s official announcements.
Digital Integration: Tools like Sirekap enhance result dissemination but demand vigilant monitoring to address technical issues.
Media Involvement: Trusted outlets play a pivotal role in distributing reliable quick count data.
Quick Count Pilkada 2024: Comprehensive Insights and Monitoring Tools
The 2024 Pilkada, Indonesia’s regional elections, has drawn significant public and political attention. With millions of voters across provinces, quick count results have become an essential tool for gauging preliminary election outcomes. These early indicators offer both candidates and the public a glimpse into potential results while waiting for the official count by the General Elections Commission (KPU).
Read more on Google News
What Is Quick Count and Why Is It Important?
Quick counts are data-driven methods to project election results based on samples taken from polling stations. They are distinct from exit polls, which rely on interviews with voters after casting their ballots. Quick counts utilize official data directly from the polling stations, making them highly reliable for early projections.
Monitoring Real Count Results
While quick counts are widely regarded for speed, the KPU’s Real Count system provides official results. The Sistem Informasi Rekapitulasi (Sirekap), KPU’s digital tool, is used to collect and publish vote counts directly from polling stations. This system improves transparency, allowing the public to access real-time data. However, Sirekap has faced criticism for technical glitches in previous elections. Ahead of the 2024 Pilkada, KPU has committed to enhancing the system’s accuracy and reliability
How to Access Real Count Data:
Visit the KPU’s official portal or mobile application.
Navigate through province-specific links to find detailed results.
The interface allows citizens to track results by district and region.
Live Quick Count Updates
Major news outlets play a pivotal role in distributing quick count results to the public. Reputable platforms like Kompas, Tempo, and CNN Indonesia provide real-time updates through their websites and social media channels. For example:
Tempo offers step-by-step guides for checking real count updates and detailed reporting from the field.
Kompas publishes quick count results with regular updates, ensuring transparency in data processing
CNN Indonesia streams live quick counts from four prominent survey institutions, consolidating data for easier public access
Read more on Google News
Challenges and Criticisms of Quick Counts
Although quick counts are celebrated for their speed and efficiency, they are not without challenges. Critics often point to:
Sample Size and Coverage: The accuracy depends on the breadth and randomness of samples taken from polling stations.
Technical Glitches: Digital tools like Sirekap have previously faced synchronization issues, causing delays in publishing data.
Public Misinterpretation: Quick counts are preliminary and should not be mistaken for official results. Misunderstandings may lead to premature declarations of victory by candidates.
To address these concerns, institutions conducting quick counts follow strict accreditation and quality control protocols. The KPU also works to educate voters about the distinction between quick counts and official real counts
Key Takeaways for Pilkada 2024
Quick Count Insights: They provide fast, reliable snapshots of election trends, helping stakeholders prepare for potential outcomes.
Real Count Accuracy: The KPU’s improved digital tools aim to ensure credibility and transparency in the official tally.
Public Engagement: Real-time updates from trusted news outlets allow citizens to stay informed and involved in the electoral process.
Read more on Google News
#Pilkada 2024#Quick count results#KPU real count#Sirekap Pilkada#Live election updates Indonesia#Regional elections 2024#Kompas quick count#Tempo Pilkada coverage#How to check real count#CNN Indonesia election news
1 note
·
View note