#shuri and namor

[indiebyrdn7]

NAMURI

[darkmemesworld]

Why when im scrolling through a tag i flashed by cho0chie 😦?

All jokes aside i had posted a meme and not even 3 minutes later it got flagged.. and im starting to see a lot of prn bots is it just me???

But why did my stuff get flagged but bots thats are showing naked people still up 🤔

[chaos0pikachu]

it's funny because back in the day people used to say they couldn't/didn't ship characters of color because they were "boring" or "under developed" compared to gringitos but now that we have a slew of well developed, interesting, and prominent chars of color people just say you can't ship them because of [insert problematic bingo square] and idk man I find all that cardi b that's suspious dot gif

[dailymarvelstudios]

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever (2022), dir. Ryan Coogler

[star-shippin-clown]

We are so back nashuri truthers

[axelboneboy]

The after credit scene with Namor is hilarious when you look at it from the perspective of a Nashuri shipper. Namor is just trying to explain why shuri is 100% gonna hit him up again and Namora is just looking at him like ‘bro, she’s not coming back’.

The look on Namora’s face always sends me😭😭

“She still wanna hit, trust🤞🤞”

[moon-ayyye]

Enemies to lovers except they meet once a month to fight. Winner gets to bottom. No other interaction between them at all.

[lanfear-is-my-darkmistress]

I swear that man saying Riri was a stain on Stark's legacy was ridiculous no Tony's actions were a stain on his OWN legacy. Also how come that shady ass professor who stole Riri's work and gave to the government hasn't been mentioned. Riri should have gotten full compensation from the school afor that. I would have SUED HIM.

[renaissance35]

Is It Just Me,

Or ...?

Is

Marvel..?

What's Marvel trying to say here??🤔🤔

[indiebyrdn7]

[laninasinamor]

it’s been YEARS 🥹

[wenellyb]

The Cast of Avengers: Doomsday

[etnikangel]

Kukulkan and his wife enjoying a late night swim… and I’m not sorry.

Been away 🌊🌊🪼🪼🪼🌘💙

[blackgowrl14]

AS AN NASHURI (Namor X Shuri) AND SAMBUCKY (Sam X Bucky) SHIPPER I AM WINNING SO HARD!!! LIKE LITERALLY IN DOOMSDAY ALL FOUR OF THEM ARE GOING TO HAVE AN INTERACTION (I’m speaking it to life) MY TWITTER & TUMBLR IS TRULY A BLESSING YALL!!🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾

Then on top of it we’re possibly getting a Riri x Hood ship coming in IRONHEART Ohhhh I can’t wait!! 😝

(If ur a mutual /follower of mine and u agree pls leave a heart in the notes) 🫶🏾 🤍

[sunriozz]

She wakan on my da till i forever

[darklinaforever]

Let me be clear.

Ellen's age is never stated in the Nosferatu movie. Even less so when she met Orlok.

It doesn't even say how many years passed between her meeting with Orlok and her meeting with Thomas in fact.

The term child is also often alternated with simply young in the movie.

Ellen's age is therefore intentionally ambiguous whether in the present or the past.

The temporality of the movie is also intentionally ambiguous.

Therefore, yes, you can interpret Ellen as being a literal child at the time she met Orlok if you want, but it is actually more likely that the words child and young are just used to express the fact that Ellen was young (not necessarily a child for our time or the era of the movie) with no real life experience and or simply naive at the time. Not that she was literally a child / a little girl.

It's common in movies and in various shows. When a character says themselves to have been a child, it doesn't mean that they literally / officially were ! Shit !

House of the Dragon is a very good example with Rhaenyra telling Daemon in episode 7 of season 1 that he abandoned her when she was only a child, knowing that she was canonically 19 years old when Daemon gone and that in addition we are in the feudal era, where you can marry very young (even before having your first period) and that the majority is 16 years old for girls officially.

I say it again, if the movie was supposed to show Ellen as a child without ambiguity, the temporality would have been clearer, the ages would have been clearly stated, and especially the actress would not have been the same for the opening scene.

Oh, and the film crew would also talk about this very important detail of Ellen who would have been a child when she met Orlok, except that no, generally speaking, they too simply use the term young to designate her at that time.

I'm tired of seeing people try to pretend that it's 100% true that Ellen was a little girl when she met Orlok. No, it's not true.

Officially, it's 50 / 50.

But unofficially, it's a safe bet that since the film's timeline is blurry, that the terms child and young are often alternated in the film and that the film crew from what I saw only used the term young to designate Ellen at the time she met Orlok, well that these terms in the film are there to simply reflect Ellen's naivety at the time she met Orlok, and was simply not yet married.

Knowing that in the Victorian era, a woman is generally still treated like a child while being married, I'll let you imagine when she simply wasn't...

Especially since I recall that Orlok represents Ellen's sexual awakening.

Generally translating in fiction for female characters concerned by the "sexual awakening" aspect of the female character's entry into her real life as a woman with her who therefore leaves the world of childhood. It's a classic. And the female character still doesn't need to be a literal child for this type of scenario.

Reylo in Star Wars is a very good example of that, with Rey experiencing a passage to adulthood thanks to her meeting with her soul mate and sexual awakening Kylo Ren / Ben Solo (the same thing happens on Kylo Ben side by the way).

Or again with Shuri and Namor in Wakanda Forever, Shuri experiencing a sexual awakening thanks to the character of Namor who will symbolically make her grow up, go from child to adult (while officially in age she is already an adult, but not emotionally / on a symbolic level).

So the fact that there is ambiguity about whether Ellen was a child or just young when she met Orlok could also just fit into this category of fictional trope. Namely, Orlok was the character made to allow Ellen to grow in various ways symbolically.

The fact is that Ellen could very well have been a teenager, young or more or less old (remember that at that time women were marriageable at 13 years old, the historical context is important) or already a young woman when she met Orlok. We can't know 100% but I would lean much more towards the second option, since the question of age is never really on the front of the stage in the film (ans Ellen is still considered as young in the film in the current time frame. Von franz literally referred to Ellen as a child in the scene when he first meets her and she is tied up. This is just further evidence that child or young is not a literal reference as Ellen is clearly not a child and married at the time), and not a real factor for the Orlok & Ellen relationship and especially his heart.

People try to create this classic scenario of the adult Orlok targeting a child Ellen to manipulate her as he pleases.

Except that's not the case.

Orlok wasn't interested in Ellen because she was young and easily manipulated. He was interested in her because she was like him, not of the living world, and she called to him. She is the enchantress who brought him into this world. They are connected by destiny. She brought him into this world and only she can take him out of it.

Orlok represents what society restricts in Ellen and prevents her from expressing. Her true desires that were considered evil in a woman at the time.

Seeing Orlok as Ellen's abuser from childhood to adulthood doesn't work on the overall message of the film.

Orlok is not Ellen's real abuser, but the society around her is.

It's all just told in a monstrous way because we're in a horror film who telling a gothic romance.

That was my rant.