#pro-Dem

[wyrmfedgrave]

When you can't trust your usual lying corporate newscasters - one might as well look for an outside source.

There's actually a growing field out there - of 'free' pundits (on podcasts) that one can search the web for.

Medias Touch is one of the more reputable news sources one can hope for.

Give them a shot, why don't yah...

End.

[chadepitanga]

@ usamericans who didnt vote because they think firebombing a walmart is better, I need to see the practical results of that on my desk by next monday. I need you to bring the end of capitalism and democracy by the end of the month. Since you thought not voting was okay, I best see the results of your alternative as soon as I'm seeing the results of your inaction. You idiot.

[terryfuckingturniptruck]

Alright, here we go again. I'm sorry that you all want to feel righteous and just but not voting or voting third party is only going to make everything worse. Of course the dems are fucked up politicians too but if you are going to just not vote for anyone bc of the genocide, then you are voting indirectly for that orange fucker to be back in office. And not only is he for the genocide in Palestine, he is for various other types of genocide and other egregious behaviors as we've seen.

[cosmoweirdkid]

[siren-crown]

It is wild to see so many Dems on Twitter let their masks slip and go full-fledged racists towards Latinos and Arabs. I have seen people gleefully talking about calling ICE or watching it be called. Also, the number of people wishing Trump to crater Gaza is sickening.

Like, they recognize these things are racist and life ruining. I saw a man say you should call ICE on Trump supporters undocumented family members which is FUCKED. Undocumented people can't vote, they had no say in this election and they know how bad ICE is, but they are willing for them to be casualties in order to "teach a lesson". I saw other people about not only breaking the Starbucks boycott to punish pro palestine people, but to boycott Arab businesses.

THE MOMENT THINGS GOT TOUGHER EVERYONE STARTED LEANING INTO WHITE SUPREMACY TO PUNISH THOSE ALREADY VULENERABLE.

[devilsrains]

stage eroica:

yuki nakayama as earl dorian red gloria / mitsu murata as major klaus von dem eberbach / shin'ichi wago as the man in purple (x)

[michaelgovehateblog]

I just noticed I said in my tags on another post that I'd have liked to vote labour I meant green!!!! I absolutely did not want to vote labour, think I read the word labour on the TV as I was typing and distracted myself

[rpfd]

After watercolors I wanted to try some markers, so here’s the Briscoes!

[icantalk710]

Wish the party loyalist "stop making Harris look bad bc Trump" people would realize that a) denying reality is exactly what the right does and b) it is on the candidate to win votes by not being a genocide enabling sellout moderate getting endorsed by the fucking Cheneys for her hawkishness on foreign policy while promising little for people at home, not on the voter disillusioned by said issues that the candidate could rectify

[wyrmfedgrave]

When you can't trust your usual lying corporate newscasters - one might as well look for an outside source.

There's actually a growing field out there - of 'free' pundits (on podcasts) that one can search the web for.

Medias Touch is one of the more reputable news sources one can hope for.

Give them a shot, why don't yah...

End.

[krakhatoa]

the mfers too stupid to use their goddamn brains and are instead blaming third party voters when Harris would NOT have won even if every single third party voter in the swing states went to her just shows how stupid you bitches be and refuse to ACKNOWLEDGE THAT A PARTY DELIBERATELY ALLOWING A FOREIGN COUNTRY TO CONTROL THEM IS THE FUCKING ISSUE THAT LEAD TO THIS LOSS

do some goddamn math with the data IN FRONT OF YOU TO SEE ITS NOT THE THIRD PARTY VOTERS BUT THE LIBS AND DEMS ALIENATION OF PPL CARING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS THAT LEAD TO THIS LOSS

[sn4pe]

“snape bullied kids blah blah blah he was neville’s boggart blah blah blah”

i don’t care 😇❤️ hope this helps!

[anglocatholicboyo]

In Canada in 2015, 1 in 50 deaths were caused by assisted suicide. By 2020, that rate had doubled - *doubled*, to 1 in 25. If we accept that you can only 'know' about 150 people at once, then that would mean each person would know 6 people who died by assisted suicide.

Faced with these numbers, are we actually expected to believe that before Canada legalised assisted suicide, there were really that many people who were in such intolerable and untreatable pain that they were just itching to die early? I doubt it. I think it's more likely that where assisted suicide is legalised, attitudes towards suicide and the sanctity of life change for the worse.

This is why I object to the term 'assisted dying', which I regard as an insidious euphemism. This issue is not separable from the problem of suicide more broadly in society. The rates of suicide in the Netherlands have only increased since that country legalised assisted suicide, compare 8.3 suicides per 100,000 deaths in 2007 with 11.3 per 100,000 in 2017. The 'sanctity of life' argument is not just religionese, it's backed up by the facts.

Opponents of assisted suicide, like myself, talk about Canada and the Netherlands and Belgium so much that even I think we begin to sound like a broken record, but I think this is warranted. These countries are only the most extreme examples, but out of the 19 countries which have legalised assisted suicide, nearly all of them have expanded the eligibility criteria beyond the supposdely robust raft of safeguards originally promised.

Are we really so naïve as to think that it can't possibly happen here? This is a country which voted to leave the EU, after all. Given what's at stake, I don't for a moment trust us to get this right.

[freetheshit-outofyou]

When Democrats put there racisms on full display but hide it under the illusion of attacking white males and the Constitution. I'm told minority populations are under privileged and over pricing things or requiring things like a photo I.D. to make certain transactions is racist. BUT, democrats keep trying to "tax out" a Right guaranteed in the Bill of Rights, and who will this tax hurt the most? The poor, the under privileged, minority populations, marginalized populations and make it so ones RIGHT to self protection and self preservation are luxuries only the upper few percent of the population can afford. Talk about "Jim Crow" style laws, if passed it would make sure that the only firearms people could buy were stolen, thus making every firearm's owner a criminal just to be able to afford to protect themselves. The text for H.R. 5135 (2023) is not available yet, but one can assume it will have the same or similar verbiage as H.R. 8051 (2022). That means the "articles" about the new bill will call it something like “Assault Weapons Excise Act” and as this one does, talking about getting weapons of war off our streets but it's all smoke and mirrors. The 2022 included pistols, rifles, and shotguns that were greater in caliber than .22 rimfire. Lever actions and bolt actions that were tube fed or had fixed magazines AND held less than 11 rounds AND were rimfire were exempt, ALL OTHER FIREARMS WERE COVERED IN THIS BLANKET POLL TAX, sorry excise tax. You know what words are not used in the bill or any writings, crime or criminals. This bill, as with its predecessor, will not address crime, it won't address the lack of prosecution of criminals who use firearms to terrorize our population, NOPE, just the guns by punishing the legal buyer. They should name H.R. 5135 the "Firearm black-market creation" bill or "Only the rich can buy a firearm" bill.