#pop culture criticism
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Absolutely banging essay by Maureen Ryan on the miracles Charisma Carpenter wrought as Cordelia Chase and what that cost her.
I’ve tried to write this essay for a decade. I have written so many versions of it. I don’t know if I cracked the formula. I do know, now, that it’s not about the man. It never was. I want to talk about the woman. The women. Who are not perfect, who are messy, angry, funny, brave. Through the lens of one woman who had to forge through the unknown, with so much pressing on her from all sides.
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
Franchises will never die
youtube
@themousefromfantasyland @the-blue-fairie @thealmightyemprex
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
@amalthea9 @princesssarisa @angelixgutz @themousefromfantasyland @the-blue-fairie @professorlehnsherr-almashy @inevitablemoment @thealmightyemprex @tamisdava2 @the-gentile-folklorist
“don’t reduce this female character down to a love interest” does not translate into “this female character shouldn’t have a love interest.”
preventing female characters with strong, compelling narratives from experiencing love, intimacy, and affection is just as regressive as reducing them down to sexual accessories for male characters. it assumes that women must choose between a romantic interest and depth of character and ignores a far more productive message: that women are capable of possessing both.
87K notes
·
View notes
Text
LORE | REKINDLED EPISODE 59 - GOING UP
Previous episode | Next episode
Getting to re-invent the elevator scene from S1 was super fun, especially with the accompaniment of Persephone; I always enjoy writing their back-and-forths, it very much plays to my own writing interests and strengths :'3 Thanks so much for reading! <3
----
Come join the discussion in our Discord!
The time lapse for this episode is coming soon to Patreon!
Watch me draw the next episode on Twitch
#lore rekindled#lore rekindled update#lore rekindled comic#lore olympus rewrite#lore olympus redraw#anti lore olympus#lore olympus critical#lo critical#also if anyone gets the super obscure pop culture reference i put in this then you officially qualify for a veteran's discount#if you know you know
604 notes
·
View notes
Text
#zero critical thinking skills in this fandom I’m afraid#too many of yall are celebrity worshippers who want tay to interact with her public persona as much as possible#just so that you can consume as much pop culture news as possible#please find other things to be interested in#you don’t have to know every detail of her relationship#y’all hate introverts too and it’s so obvious#your praise her when she valued her privacy and now you look back on that and say she was in jail?#taylor swift#taylorswift#ts#the tortured poets department#ttpd#joe alwyn#swifties#yall need to learn to not place value on superficial Hollywood celebrity gossip
243 notes
·
View notes
Text
YES.
ALL OF THIS.
THIS is why this film still hits so hard after all these years.
It’s not some sugary BS about “you can think yourself out of suicidal depression by just learning to appreciate what you’ve got”.
It’s about the fact that people who work really fucking hard for their communities experience active, targeted, criminal pushback from exploiters.
About the fact that caring, in all its manifestations, is incredibly physically and mentally taxing and is often done by disabled people - YES, George Bailey is a disabled protagonist. His impairment prevents him from military service and actively causes him chronic pain that, as a person who lives with it, *will* affect his energy levels and fatigue constantly.
Notably, IAWL actually has a bunch of disabled characters. Not only is George disabled, but I’d put money on his uncle who loses the money being ADHD and very possibly having other learning disabilities and the film *actively* flagging that fact to the audience, even if it doesn’t necessarily know what ADHD is.
Which casts a whole new light on its principal villain being disabled. Instead of Old Man Potter being a flat caricature of “disability = evil”, what he *actually* is is a fantastic example of the fact that marginalisation in one axis does not prevent someone being an active oppressor - and wealth and class privilege, in particular, tend to mean a person actively acting to oppress other people who share their marginalisation in order to privilege the interests of their own class as a whole. Sometimes even damaging their own individual interests to do so.
It’s also super interesting that the *material* miracle in the film is not the appearance of an angel to show George what life would have been like if he had never existed, but the *community solidarity* that saves him from jail and his family from penury. The supernatural intervention can change his *mindset*, and that is *incredibly* important, given it *literally* stops him killing himself, but the *material* intervention is mutual aid from his own community that he has given so much to.
Which is incredibly radical as a message. It’s not saying “faith is worthless”; it’s saying “faith can be an incredibly important factor in creating resilience in moments of despair, but we can’t, and *need not*, wait for a supernatural miracle to save us; we have the capacity to save ourselves and each other in our hands right now”.
#it’s a wonderful life#film criticism#disability#disability in media#mutual aid in media#george bailey#wow I know I liked it’s a wonderful life but apparently my feelings are way stronger than I appreciated#why I fucking hate sugary reductionism in pop culture sometimes#fuck I love this movie#disability in film
186 notes
·
View notes
Text
@the-blue-fairie @isareadsandwatches
People will spend hours watching "ending explained" videos and reading about how Ed, Edd, n Eddy is set in purgatory or some such barmy nonsense, but the moment you tell them a piece of media was motivated by racism or corporate interest in affecting public opinion or the Pentagon's funding suddenly you're reading too much into it.
69K notes
·
View notes
Text
Any time I see someone be like All music is bad now it’s all about tiktok trends spotify radio billboard charts pitchfork RYM it’s all soulless and homogeneous and tame subculture is dead genre is dead I’m just like . This is quite literally a skill issue. You’re just admitting that you don’t know how or are not trying to find anything more obscure than the stuff that’s trending or being algorithmically handed to you. You understand that right. Like there is music out there beyond what 17 y/os on tiktok are recording themselves dancing to in cosplay or what youtube reviewers are making videos about. Subculture exists in the real world in underground more-often-than-not predominantly marginalized communities that are thriving outside of the realm of what’s trending on social media or what’s being sold by fast fashion retail stores. Oftentimes because the hot spots of genuinely boundary pushing underground subculture are literally illegal. You not knowing it exists doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You know this. right.
#& like as always that’s not to say you can’t or shouldn’t criticize mainstream popular culture like. of course.#but imo it is a world of difference to criticize mainstream pop culture vs suggesting that There Is No Subculture#and very much imply if not state outright that all there is now is whatever is being spoonfed to you via algorithm lol…#like ‘this thing is bad’ and ‘this thing is all that exists’ are just. not the same criticism. shouldn’t even need to be said.
71 notes
·
View notes
Photo
#tweet#tweets#twitter#books and literature#books and writing#books and libraries#books and authors#books and reading#1984#nineteen eighty four#fahrenheit 451#dystopian#Dystopia#AI art#AI#Society and Culture#pop culture#cultural critique#cultural criticism#technology#Entertainment#movies#film#TV#art#the arts#novel writing machine#george orwell#orwellian#orwell
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
@thealmightyemprex @the-blue-fairie @themousefromfantasyland
"This anxiety about surrendering a beloved franchise to a new generation of fans with different perspectives and values is also reflected in Doctor Who fandom. Recently, Doctor Who Magazine made the controversial decision to appoint a new “Time Team” of reviewers to analyse the classic series. This prompted a lot of preemptive anxiety from older fans, with many taking to social media with threats of a boycott. Naturally, things exploded when these young reviewers acknowledged the self-evident fact that beloved serial The Talons of Weng-Chiang was horrifically racist. Even the magazine’s editorial lambasted them.
There is something disappointing in all of this. One of the best things about fandom is the way that it is passed on like a baton from one generation to the next, and the way in which that generation are allowed to find their own own way. The archetypal memory for many Star Wars fans is going to see the original trilogy with their parents. Many modern Doctor Who fans might have relatives who remember the classic series. The James Bond film franchise also spans generations, and it’s entirely possible for two generations of any family to have grown up with different iterations, having their own preferences.
My own fandom is rooted in this experience. I inherited my love of Star Trek from my grandmother, who loved the original Star Trek and The Next Generation. However, she never appreciated Deep Space Nine. Indeed, my decisions to press ahead with Deep Space Nine on my own and to reach my own conclusions about it were a massive part of my fandom. Similarly, I inherited my love of horror from my grandfather, who showed me wonderfully inappropriate movies at a young age. He loved Wes Craven and John Carpenter, as did I. However, I had to branch out to The X-Files on my own.
I always considered this an important part of my fannish experiences, and I never begrudged my grandparents for holding slightly different tastes than I did. I’d have similar experiences with people that I introduced to my favourite things; their tastes would inevitably grow and develop in directions that reflected their own interests. They would branch beyond my taste and cultivate their own fandom that overlapped with mine by was also distinct in its contours. This never bothered me or unsettled me, and I never resented these people for that fact. I always saw it as an important part of sharing something; realising that it doesn’t belong entirely and completely to you.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
@isareadsandwatches
There is a streak of anti-intellectualism when it comes to talking about films, and it's one of my biggest pet peeves. People are seemingly completely incapable of distinguishing between "what happened in the film" and "what the film is ABOUT."
To cite one of my favorite examples, The Shape of Water is not ABOUT a woman who fucks a fish, it is ABOUT people who are otherized by society finding comfort and beauty is what others see as their flaws. It is a beautiful film, that deserved all the praise and accolades it got.
Joker is not ABOUT mental health. It is a shallow film that uses mental health in a trivial way as a catalyst for its character's mental breakdown. Its refusal to be ABOUT anything is its greatest failure. Arthur stumbles his way into accidentally starting a riot, he admits politics do not interest him, and the concerns of those rioting are not addressed because that's not what the film is interested in. It tries to use all the right buzzwords to fake being deep, but in the end, winds up saying nothing interesting.
Annihilation is not ABOUT women going into an alien environment and experiencing wacky shit, it's about dealing with trauma, and deciding whether to let it consume you, or whether to move on.
Shit like this is why Qanon was so easily able to direct the conversation around Cuties. The director wanted to make a film about exploitation and female agency, but people are unwilling to engage with theme, they only care about surface-level shit. People took one look at the marketing, and decided they already knew what the film was about, and Qanon was able to use that to whip up a moral panic, and get people to harass the director and any critic with positive things to say about the film.
I still see social media making fun of English teachers for asking us to engage with a text beyond what's on the surface, but I think those are valuable skills when it comes to how we interact with art.
Popular YouTube channels like CinemaSins and Nostalgia Critic, which have made their anti-intellectualism into their whole careers, do not help in this regard.
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
Bob Dylan occupies this weird space of being among the pantheon of great American writers while also being a massive pop culture icon and rockstar so as a result the fanbase is a heady mix of people who see him through the lens of very serious and unflinching literary critique and analysis and people who want to put him on top of an ice cream sundae and eat him up with a spoon, and the weirdest part of all of this is that they're usually the same fucking people
#i don't know if this means we should bring more honest and unflinching critical analysis into pop culture world#or more performative pop culture obsession into serious critical analysis#but i highly suspect that it's neither#op
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ok but can we talk about the absolute horror of being watched and monitored 24/7 that the ancients must have had. The citizenship drones being like an Alexa that's constantly following and listening to you (except it's five pebbles and not Alexa lmao). The fucking OVERSEERS. THEY'RE CALLED THAT FOR A REASON. BECAUSE THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE WATCHING THEIR CITIZENS AS WELL AS THE ENVIRONMENT ALL THE TIME. (I would talk about the fact that they all show arti fucking ads as well but honestly idk what else to say about that. Capitalism got yet another society 😔). That's some fucking nightmare fuel dystopian society settings we are being hinted at. You know the Big Brother Is Watching You thing. The book. Yeah that's what it reminds me of.
The Iterator Is Watching You.
#imagine not being able to escape being watched any second of your life#imagine being one of the first ancients who saw an iterator come into being#imagine being one of the first ancients who had to go live on top of them#imagine being one of the first amcients to be constantly scrutinized by the overseers#i bet they knew this wasn't really a good thing#no matter how religious they were. by the time of pebbles though they were far too religiously indoctrinated to realize this was bad#(as a society i mean. theres always some who disagree and figure out what's going on)#disclaimer i have never read the book i am talking about and only know it through references and pop culture. still tho yk what i mean#rain world#rainworld#rain world iterator#rw iterator#iterator#rw five pebbles#five pebbles#im tagging him too even tho hes only mentioned i wanna reach more ppl with this#pls i may not have said everything i wanted to say cause i cant get my thoughts straight rn but i want to hear what yall think about this#agh the whole situation is so fucked imagine being the Big Brother in this and not even having a choice in it.#imagine that everyone with critical thinking knows this and cant do anything about it.#not even mentioning the cataclysmic level rain the iterators brought. like dude who thought this was a good idea.#imagine all this + the end of the world and its ecosystem as you know it happening right before your eyes#and you cant even blame the person at fault that much bc they were literally fucking born into this#rw overseer#forgot this one#rw ancients
303 notes
·
View notes
Text
Honestly, we need better, more thought-provoking, intersectional discourse. And for that to happen, people need to stop picking at the lowest hanging fruit or focusing on spectacle and get to the actual issues. People need to be able to fathom that multiple ideas can co-exist at the same time, that 2 or more things can be true or false simultaneously.
Mm... the discourse is lacking these days. Nothing annoys me more than bad public discourse.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
not to be a cheap disney shill but i really like agatha all along so far
#i'll keep it to my personal blog bc i can feel myself about to spam reblog a bunch of the gay shit that happened in that show#aubrey plaza... kathryn hahn.... the women you are....#that song is ROOTED in my brain#also the opening was so fun! all the different pop culture witches!!!#how often do we get such a strong female cast#and largely of middle aged women at that!!!#and PATTI LUPONE????#all these mfing critics like 'idk who this show was made for'#it was made for ME!!!!#agatha is Me in every way. we're both just purple witches craving power and attention#i haven't watched a disney series since andor but this. this i like
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
Day 549
#ashley of the day#ashley johnson#critical role#critical role cast#laura bailey#travis willingham#taliesin jaffe#via: denver pop culture con
58 notes
·
View notes