#pitbull welfare

[iamactivedoggy]

Stand Out with the Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Tote Bag!

Hey there!

Are you a pitbull enthusiast looking to express your love for this remarkable breed in a fun and fashionable way? Look no further because we have the perfect solution for you! Introducing our Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Tote Bag.

This tote bag is a must-have for anyone who wants to stand out from the crowd. With its vibrant neon design featuring the iconic blue nose pitbull, this bag is sure to turn heads wherever you go. It's a statement piece that showcases your passion for these incredible dogs while adding a touch of humor to your style.

Not only is this tote bag visually striking, but it also offers practicality and durability. The spacious interior allows you to carry all your essentials, whether you're heading to the beach, the gym, or running errands. The sturdy handles ensure comfortable carrying, and the premium fabric ensures this bag will withstand the test of time.

By purchasing this Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Tote Bag, you're not only adding a unique accessory to your collection but also supporting our mission to promote responsible pet ownership and advocate for pitbull welfare. So, join us in spreading awareness and love for these wonderful dogs while making a fashion statement.

Don't miss out on this limited edition tote bag! Visit our website or head to our store to grab yours today and show off your passion for blue nose pitbulls in a fun and stylish way. Be ready to receive compliments and spark conversations wherever you carry this eye-catching tote bag!

Get your Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Tote Bag now and be a trendsetter among pitbull lovers!

Happy shopping!

[plasticstrawsmuggler]

I said this in a repost but I feel like it deserves it's own post. DO NOT SUPPORT PETA. They might be called "People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals" but that's not what they're about.

The first red flag is the term "animal rights" and their shitty attitude towards the term "animal welfare." Animal rights has the end goal of ending the use of animals for any reason, including companionship and medical reasons. It is not grounded in reality. Animal welfare on the other hand focuses on the wellbeing of animals, it acknowledges that humans and domestic animals rely on each other. Animal welfare promotes the ethical consumption of animal products, which is great because some people (like me) can't go vegan.

The second red flag is their euthanasia rates. The AKC and the Virginia Veterinary Medical Association have both denounced PETA because the euthanasia rate in one of their Virginia shelters was 99%. In 2022 they euthanized 79% of their cat intakes and 95% of the surviving cats were sent to kill-shelters (which actually aren't as bad as one might think, but you'd assume an organization like PETA would be anti-kill shelter). They euthanized 68% of their dog intakes, but only adopted out 4%. I could not find what happened to the other 28%, but if the cats were any indication they sent them to other shelters. They euthanized 78% of their animal intakes that were not cats or dogs. Ex-employees have repeatedly reported that many of the animals PETA euthanizes did not need to be euthanized.

The third red flag is their misinformation campaign. An excellent example is their anti-wool campaign that features a poster of a bloody lamb. If sheep are not shorn, they will heat exhaust and potentially die. Even animal sanctuaries shear their sheep. Shearing is like a hair cut, the skin is not touched. In other campaigns they intentionally omit information, such as practices being approved by vets in order to safeguard health (such as pregnant sows being separated from the other pigs, it's done to prevent fights).

The fourth red flag is their stance on pitbulls, that stems directly from the founder. The founder wrote a newspaper article calling for shelters to destroy all dogs that look like pitbulls. PETA itself has joined up with groups advocating for the ban of pitbulls. While I do admit that pits can be dangerous, and that a shit ton of behavior is genetic, banning all pits is ridiculous. Pits can be great dogs if trained and raised correctly, and banning them will lead to dogs dying, including dogs that aren't even pitbulls. Shelter and animal control workers are notoriously bad at identifying what is and isn't an American pitbull terrier.

[jesse-pinko]

Okay I am going to try and word this very carefully for the benefit of the internet strawman that lives in my head that is already playing telephone with what I’m trying to say butttt as an animal caretaker I’m not loving the way y’all talk about animal welfare. Don’t get me wrong (please) drawing comparisons between how white people treat people of color and how they treat animals is a totally valid way to illustrate how white people often view and treat people of color as subhuman, but lately I kind of feel like this sentiment is being reiterated over and over again without being expanded on in terms of either human rights or animal welfare. I think it’s valuable and even critical to examine the historical context behind white supremacy’s investment in animal welfare, but that it’s a mistake to view the two as inextricably linked. White supremacists will also claim to have a vested interest in children’s rights, which couldn’t be further from the truth if you take even a cursory look at their policies and practices, but the reason they pretend to give a shit about children and animals without bothering to extend this same courtesy to people of color, queer people, etc is because children and animals cannot advocate for themselves, which leaves room for racists to hawk their own agenda under the guise of charity. They are not interested in advocating on behalf of anyone they cannot completely control. Animals aren’t treated well, which I believe was the initial reasoning behind the comparison to racism; that white people abuse people of color even more fervently than they do animals. But that’s a call to end systemic injustice towards people of color, not to forego animal advocacy altogether. We should all care about animals! We should all be working toward educating ourselves about the literal millions of other living beings we share a planet with, whose habitats we are destroying without impunity, who are entirely at our mercy, who are disposed of and exploited and treated more as objects to facilitate human existence than living creatures in their own right, even when they fall into the very exclusive category of beloved. It’s imperative for safety reasons to educate ourselves about animal behavior, not to mention fundamental to indigenous activism to work toward the preservation of their habitats and continued existence on this planet. Also, I fully reject the fundamentally Christian idea that animals don’t have souls, that they don’t have feelings, that they were put on this earth to prop up humanity, that their behaviors and physiologies are all virtually the same because they all fall into the very broad category of Not Human. I agree that saying their mistreatment is somehow worse than racism is misleading, wildly ignorant and offensive, not because animals don’t deserve our protection, but because it demonstrates such little understanding of and willingness to understand the consequences of racism, and because these are really different issues altogether. Animals don’t want or need human rights; they’re not human. They prioritize differently, even the expectation of being eaten is just a normative experience for them, as ghoulish as that sounds. But not being human, or anything akin to human, doesn’t make them automatons, doesn’t mean they can’t feel pain or should be treated unfairly. They are an integral part of all of our lives even if you don’t consider yourself an animal person, and we should try and extend understanding and empathy towards them for no other reason than that they are alive.

[kfpcollector]

⚠️ SIGN to help our shelter dogs! ⚠️

🩵 At the moment, the Irish government is imposing a ban on XL Bully dogs. If you love dogs, please consider signing the petition to extend the rehoming of XL Bullies this October! 

🩵 “From October 1st 2024, new regulations will prohibit the importing, breeding, selling and RE-HOMING of XL Bullies.”  

🩵 Hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent dogs will be euthanised in shelters this October. If you agree with the ban, so be it, I will not argue with that. But the mass euthanasia that is about to take place is completely unnecessary and cruel. Shelters in Ireland do a fantastic job at rehoming rescue dogs and specific breeds to appropriate and responsible homes. There is simply no need to force shelters to euthanise these bully dogs when there are experienced people willing to rescue and train them. 

🩵 We are NOT advocating to stop the ban altogether. We are simply advocating to lift (or at least delay) the rehoming ban. 

🩵 Please sign the petition to save these dogs! Thank you and have a wonderful day x

[bowiehawk1ns]

Name: Bowie Hawkins

Nickname: Bow

Age: 34

Sex/Gender: cisfemale (she/her)

Sexuality: pansexual

Occupation: lieutenant firefighter.

FC: Barrett Doss

Trigger Warnings under the read more: child neglect, child abuse, fire, death

Quick facts:

she is from Briar Ridge

She works as a lieutenant firefighter

She has a hard time letting people in.

She has a pitbull named Kiva.

Never in Lilianna and Marco Romano’s dreams did they imagine having a child and they made sure Bowie knew it. They resented her for even being conceived, as if she had anything to do with it. It was honestly a miracle that the little girl survived living in that house as long as she had, which was until she was 8 years old. By the time she was 5 she had learned how to use the stove and how to keep herself alive while her parents went out of their way to party and leave the girl on her own. She preferred when she was by herself, because then they didn’t leave her with their creepy friends they tended to when she was a baby. When she was 8, her teacher got curious and she ended up telling her all about what her home life was like and she called Child Welfare Services who removed her from the home. 

Bowie was placed in a temporary foster home and then she went to who would be her adoptive home, her teacher. At first she didn’t believe it, but she knew she was lucky because she was an older kid and they didn’t always get adopted but her teacher had taken a liking to her and she was happy in her home with her new family. She finally was growing and flourishing with a loving family where she felt happy and loved. She had two parents who loved her and a younger brother who she got along really well with and it made her turn away from the path she would have been heading. She lived a good life from 8 onwards and she knew better than to take any of it for granted. All good things must come to an end, or so Bowie had heard. She experienced it when she was only 16. There was a fire, and Bowie got her and her adoptive brother out but the two of them couldn’t save their parents who perisshed in the fire. The siblings were sent to a foster home, something Bowie only had to experience once before, almost a distant memory at that point. They were unfortunately separated at that point. Bowie had fought pretty hard to get them into the same home but it never happened. She was also never formally adopted and aged out of the system at 18. She changed her last name from Romano to Hawkins to match her adoptive family.

After everything she had been through, Bowie has a bit of a tough shell but underneath it all she is a teddy bear. She would never admit it to anybody, but she still deals with memories, almost like she is back in the fire. They come in her dreams and she tends to wake up with night sweats. She knows she should go talk to somebody about it but she just can’t seem to get herself to go. She is afraid of what that person would say. Though Bowie had never really thought about what she had wanted to do when she grew up, after the fire, she knew that she wanted to become a firefighter, to help save people. She worked hard once she was able to and eventually she passed training and landed a job at the firestation. She loves her job and doesn’t want to do anything else with her career. She is currently at the leutenient rank and hopes that he career only moves up. Her only wish is that she knew where her brother ended up.

[beardedmrbean]

There really is a sense of a new era beginning in Dutch politics in next week's snap parliamentary election.

Not only is a party formed only three months ago topping the polls, but the Netherlands could be about to welcome its first female prime minister too.

After 13 years as prime minister, Mark Rutte is bowing out and the 22 November election caused by the collapse of his government is being fought on a cluster of domestic crises - from the high cost of living and a shortage of housing, to healthcare and climate change.

What you need to know

Even though it has been only two years since the last vote, many of the leaders standing are new, including the two front-runners.

Dilan Yeşilgöz, 46, the new head of Mr Rutte's liberal-conservative VVD and a daughter of Turkish refugees, is now widely tipped to lead her country.

Pieter Omtzigt, 49, is riding a wave of popularity in Dutch politics, with his centrist New Social Contract party emerging from nowhere as election favourite. But he has so far been lukewarm about becoming prime minister.

What makes this election highly unpredictable is the significant proportion of floating voters deciding which 26 parties should fill the 150 seats in the Dutch parliament. There is a minimal threshold and the polls suggest as many as 17 parties could get in. The last coalition took nine months to form and lasted less than two years.

Who to watch out for

Dilan Yeşilgöz: Once dubbed a "pitbull in high heels" because of her no-nonsense politics,, she has run a slick campaign as new VVD leader. A promo video shared on social media shows her sparring with heavyweight kickboxing champion Rico Verhoeven.

As justice minister, she was seen as a tough negotiator and a strong communicator and her gender has played no part in her campaign. "I think she's avoiding these issues because the party has an over-representation of male voters in its electorate," says Sarah de Lange, professor of Political Pluralism at the University of Amsterdam.

She appeals to voters under the slogan "On your side", promising renewal despite her party being in power for more than a decade, while still sticking to a liberal-conservative message that plays well with Dutch voters.

She came to the Netherlands as a seven-year-old Turkish-Kurdish refugee, but has adopted a hard line on immigration, vowing to introduce a two-tier asylum system, cancel permanent residence permits and take better control over all forms of migration.

Unlike her predecessor as head of the VVD, Ms Yeşilgöz has not ruled out working with anti-immigration populist leader Geert Wilders, whose Party for Freedom (PVV) is riding high at fourth in the polls.

Pieter Omtzigt: An unlikely party leader, he is riding a wave of popularity in Dutch politics, having played a prominent role in 2019 in exposing a welfare scandal that left more than 20,000 families wrongly labelled as fraudsters and deprived of child benefit.

The scandal eventually brought down the third Rutte-led government in 2021. Months later Mr Omtzigt left the Christian Democrats and took several months off work for exhaustion.

Until now his ambition has been reserved for the backbenches but he has not ruled out becoming prime minister. "I have a strong preference to stay in parliament and I've already had that preference for a long time," he said.

And yet he is the politician setting the agenda in this election, says Simon Otjes, from the University of Leiden: "It's his election, his campaign, he dominated; other parties are waiting to see what Pieter Omtzigt will do."

His two big themes have become unlikely buzzwords in the campaign: improving socio-economic security - bestaanszekerheid - of Dutch households and changing the management culture of politics - bestuurscultuur.

As speculation increases of a coalition made up of four centre and right-wing parties, he has stressed he is not open to working with populist leader Geert Wilders, because "as a party you can only form a government that sticks to classic fundamental rights".

Geert Wilders: The Party for Freedom has long called for a ban on mosques, the Koran and Islamic schools, although Mr Wilders now says "there are obviously more important priorities", indicating that he is keen to play a part in government. His party is currently fourth in the polls, behind a Green-Labour alliance.

Frans Timmermans: The only left-wing candidate riding high in the polls, he resigned from his role as EU climate commissioner to lead the joint campaign by the Labour and GreenLeft parties.

One poll put the Labour-Green leader as favourite for the role of prime minister among 18-34 year-olds. But the man who spearheaded the EU's green deal had to drop a party pledge to halve emissions of nitrogen pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and ammonia by 2030 after talking to young farmers.

Caroline van der Plas: In March, her right-wing populist BBB Farmer-Citizen Movement stormed to victory in provincial elections and became the biggest party in the Dutch upper house of parliament, the senate.

That momentum has fallen away but the BBB could feature in the next government. Their big focus is on fighting stricter climate measures and imposing a refugee quota but Ms van der Plas has ruled out being prime minister as she is scared of flying and would rather be talking to the public than doing politics in Brussels.

What are the big issues?

Housing shortage: It has become so serious that the price of an average home has climbed above €400,000 (£350,000), because there about nine times as many home-hunters as flats or houses for sale.

Asja has spent seven months actively searching for a home for herself and two young children. "On a teacher's salary it's impossible to get an €800 [monthly] mortgage," she told the BBC.

State-subsidised social housing is in high demand and short supply, while private rents in major cities have rocketed. Students struggle to find accommodation and earlier this year more than 100,000 people signed a petition calling for more affordable housing.

Cost of living: Rising prices in the shops, energy and housing have left an estimated 830,000 people below the poverty line, but polls suggest a majority of Dutch people - even on middle incomes - say they're concerned about the future.

Even those who manage to find somewhere to live are facing record high energy bills. Trainee teacher Laurie Schram says she and her daughter depend on onesies and electric blankets to manage.

All the parties agree there is a crisis and Leonie de Jonge of the University of Groningen says the issue "has almost become depoliticised". Among 18-34 year olds, money worries are the decisive issue in determining who to vote for.

Climate change: Ten days before the election, tens of thousands of marchers in Amsterdam called for immediate action on the climate crisis. The Labour-Green alliance has put the issue high in its campaign, but Pieter Omtzigt has suggested that recent climate policy has focused on "an elite who can pay for it".

Healthcare: Care costs are rising everywhere, and five million Dutch citizens describe themselves as unofficial carers.

The Dutch have been paying for health insurance since 2006, on average more than €141 a month for basic care - but 61% worry they won't be able afford it. That might be why many voters want healthcare nationalised again.

[girlhorse]

i understand why anon was concerned but like, i think its a little bit of a stretch to compare an argument concerned with animal and human welfare wrt pit bulls & issues of poor transparency in dog rescues/shelters to ..um.. white supremacist tiktok videos that use anti-pitbull rhetoric as a metaphor for ethnic cleansing

[pitbullbullies]

The Appeal of Cheap Pitbull Bully Puppies: Understanding the Controversy

At first glance, the idea of purchasing a Pitbull Bully puppy at a bargain price might seem like a win-win situation for both the buyer and the seller. After all, who wouldn't want to welcome such a charming and affectionate companion into their home without breaking the bank? However, delving deeper into the issue reveals a complex web of factors that deserve careful consideration.

One of the primary concerns associated with cheap Pitbull Bully puppies is the questionable breeding practices that may be involved. Responsible breeders invest significant time, effort, and resources into ensuring the health and well-being of their dogs. They prioritize genetic testing, proper nutrition, regular veterinary care, and adequate socialization to produce puppies with sound temperament and good overall health.

In contrast, breeders offering cheap Pitbull Bully puppies may cut corners to minimize costs and maximize profits. This can result in puppies being born into substandard conditions, deprived of essential care and socialization. Without proper breeding practices in place, these puppies may be more susceptible to genetic disorders, behavioral issues, and health problems later in life, leading to emotional and financial burdens for their owners.

Furthermore, the availability of cheap Pitbull Bully puppies can contribute to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes surrounding the breed. Pitbulls, in general, have unfairly earned a reputation for aggression and violence due to the actions of a small percentage of poorly trained or mistreated dogs. While responsible ownership and positive reinforcement training can help dispel these misconceptions, the proliferation of inexpensive Pitbull Bully puppies may inadvertently fuel negative perceptions and reinforce breed-specific legislation.

Despite these concerns, cheap bully puppies it's essential to recognize that not all breeders offering affordable Pitbull Bully puppies engage in unethical practices. Some may genuinely care for their dogs and prioritize their well-being, choosing to price their puppies competitively to attract responsible buyers. However, distinguishing between reputable breeders and those looking to profit from irresponsible breeding requires thorough research, scrutiny, and discernment.

For prospective dog owners considering the adoption of a Pitbull Bully puppy, it's crucial to prioritize ethical considerations above price. Instead of focusing solely on cost, individuals should seek out reputable breeders who prioritize the health, temperament, and overall welfare of their dogs. This may involve visiting breeding facilities, asking for references, and inquiring about health clearances and genetic testing.

Additionally, adopting from animal shelters or rescue organizations is another viable option for those seeking a Pitbull Bully companion. Many loving and deserving dogs await their forever homes in shelters, offering the opportunity to provide a second chance to a dog in need while promoting responsible pet ownership.

[animals-event]

Best Dog Collars for Pitbulls

Having spent over a decade delving into the intricate world of animal behavior as a dedicated animal behavior specialist, my commitment extends beyond my professional endeavors. As a proud volunteer at an animal shelter and a passionate advocate for animal welfare, my love for animals has led me to explore various facets of their well-being. Today, I’m excited to share my insights on a topic…

[irondenkennels1]

What is The Best Age to Buy Pitbull Puppies for Sale in NJ?

The optimal age to purchase a Pitbull puppy for sale in NJ (New Jersey) is typically around 8 to 12 weeks old. During this period, the puppies have generally been weaned from their mother’s milk and have started eating solid food. They would have also received their first set of vaccinations from the breeder or shelter.

Pitbull puppies are developmentally able to transition to new homes and adjust to their new surroundings around 8 to 12 weeks old. This age is regarded as excellent for prospective owners since it allows them to begin training and socialization at a young age.

Early training and socialization are crucial for a Pitbull puppy’s proper development. It helps them learn basic obedience commands, proper behavior around people and other animals and builds their confidence and trust. Starting this process early lays a strong foundation for their future behavior as well-adjusted and well-behaved adult dogs.

When purchasing a Pitbull puppy, it is essential to acquire one from a reputable breeder or consider adoption from a responsible rescue organization or shelter. Responsible breeders prioritize the health and welfare of their dogs, conduct appropriate health checks, and provide necessary vaccinations and documentation.

Finally, the optimal age to buy a Pitbull puppy for sale in NJ is determined by the prospective owner’s specific circumstances and preparedness to assume the obligations of dog ownership. A loving and caring environment, along with proper training and care, will lay the groundwork for a lifelong attachment with your new furry companion.

[critical-skeptic]

The Pitbull Paradox: Human Folly and Canine Scapegoats

Genetics and Breeding: A History Misunderstood

Let's get this straight: Pitbulls, like any other breed, aren't born with an innate desire to rip your face off. The belief that they are inherently aggressive due to their historical breeding for bull-baiting and dog fighting is a gross oversimplification. Aggression towards humans was, in fact, considered an undesirable trait in fighting dogs, as it was essential for handlers to control them without losing a limb in the process¹. So, if you're one of those who think that Pitbulls are ticking time bombs due to their genetics, it's time to reevaluate your stance.

Environment and Socialization: Nurture over Nature

The environment in which a Pitbull is raised is as crucial as the latest season of your favorite TV show. Dogs that are socialized early, exposed to different environments, and raised in a loving setting are less likely to be aggressive². It's like raising a child; if you lock them in a basement and feed them scraps, don't expect them to grow up to be well-adjusted adults.

Training and Handling: Not for the Lazy or Faint of Heart

Pitbulls are not your average lapdogs. They are strong, energetic, and require consistent, positive reinforcement training. They are like the nerds of the dog world, eager to please and excel in whatever they do. If you're too lazy to put in the effort or think that raising a dog is a walk in the park, maybe stick to goldfish.

Media and Perception Bias: Sensationalism at Its Finest

The media loves a good horror story, and what's better than a “bloodthirsty” Pitbull on the loose? Media bias is real, and it's as subtle as a sledgehammer. Pitbull attacks are more likely to be reported, and often with a level of sensationalism that would make a tabloid blush³. This skewed representation contributes to the demonization of the breed. Take, for example, the recent tragedy in Arizona where a woman was killed by a dog⁶. The media was quick to jump on the “Pitbull attack” bandwagon, fueling the fire of breed stigmatization.

Legislation and Breed Specific Laws: A Band-Aid on a Bullet Wound

Some geniuses in the government thought it would be a great idea to enact breed-specific legislation (BSL), which restricts or bans the ownership of breeds considered to be dangerous, including Pitbulls. However, this is akin to putting a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. Many animal welfare organizations oppose BSL, arguing that it is ineffective in reducing dog attacks⁴. It's like banning spoons to combat obesity.

Individual Variation: They Are Individuals, Dammit!

Dogs, like humans, are individuals. There are friendly Pitbulls and aggressive Golden Retrievers. Painting an entire breed with the same brush is not just unfair; it's plain stupid. It’s like assuming all humans with a particular hair color are serial killers.

The Absurdity of Double Standards: Guns vs. Pitbulls

Now, let’s take a detour into the realm of the absurd to highlight the hypocrisy in society's stance on Pitbulls compared to, say, firearms. Imagine if we applied the same logic to guns as some people do to Pitbulls. “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people,” they say. But when it comes to Pitbulls, suddenly it’s “Pitbulls kill people.” Well, make up your damn mind! If we’re going to ban Pitbulls because they can be dangerous, should we not apply the same logic to firearms? It’s like saying spoons make people fat, but no one’s trying to ban spoons. This reductio ad absurdum illustrates the sheer lunacy of the double standards at play.

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not advocating for a free-for-all where any Tom, Dick, or Harry can own a Pitbull without any checks or balances. Just like with guns, there should be regulations. But these regulations should be sensible and based on facts, not hysteria.

A Call for Sensible Regulations

As a responsible dog owner myself, I firmly believe in the necessity of strict regulations for dog ownership. However, breed-specific legislation should not be based on unfounded stereotypes about a breed's aggression. Instead, it should consider factors like the dog’s weight and height class. Any dog capable of causing significant harm to humans or other animals should be subject to stricter regulations. This includes proper training, secure containment, and mandatory spaying/neutering.

Furthermore, adoption from rescue sources should be encouraged, with extensive vetting of potential owners. Rescue organizations often have a better understanding of a dog’s temperament and can ensure that they are placed in suitable homes.

In conclusion, it’s high time we put on our critical thinking caps and approached the issue of dog attacks with the same rigor and scrutiny that we would any other public safety issue. Let’s base our decisions on solid evidence and not let irrational fears dictate policies that affect the lives of innocent animals and responsible dog owners.

Responsible Ownership: The Missing Link

Here’s the kicker: the common denominator in dog attacks is not the breed; it’s irresponsible ownership. Proper care, training, and supervision are key in ensuring that any dog, regardless of its breed, doesn’t end up on the evening news⁵.

The Human Element: The Real Culprit

Now, let's talk about the elephant in the room: human stupidity. From irresponsible owners who couldn't train a dog to sit if their life depended on it, to people who approach unfamiliar dogs like they're in a Disney movie. Not to mention the government agencies that are about as effective as a screen door on a submarine. The recent incident in Arizona is a tragedy, no doubt⁶. But where do we draw the line between a breed's predisposition and human error or negligence? The woman who lost her life in that incident is a victim, but so is the dog that was likely failed by humans.

Biases in Data Interpretation: A Mirage of Misinformation

When it comes to interpreting data on dog attacks, biases such as survivor bias and the conflation of correlation with causality often lead to erroneous conclusions. For instance, larger breeds like Pitbulls and Rottweilers are often involved in fatal attacks, not necessarily because they are more aggressive, but because their size and strength make the attacks more likely to be fatal. Smaller breeds might be equally or more aggressive but are less likely to kill, so their attacks go underreported. This is a classic example of survivor bias.

Moreover, the high incidence of attacks by Pitbulls, as reported in some studies, might not be indicative of the breed's aggression but rather a result of irresponsible ownership and breed misidentification. The term "Pitbull" is often used as a catch-all label for any muscular dog with a big head. It's like calling every soda "Coke."

The Bottom Line: Human Accountability

So, what's the bottom line? It's simple. Stop blaming the dogs and start taking human accountability seriously. From the owners to the media, to the people interacting with dogs, it's a human problem. Pitbulls are not the problem; ignorance and irresponsibility are. And for Pete's sake, let's base our opinions on facts, not fear-mongering.

References:

Dickey, Bronwen. Pit Bull: The Battle over an American Icon. 2016. Vintage Books. Summary: This book delves into the history of Pitbulls, debunking common myths and misconceptions about the breed, and sheds light on how societal biases have contributed to the negative image of Pitbulls. Link: Pit Bull: The Battle over an American Icon

Herron, Meghan E., Frances S. Shofer, and Ilana R. Reisner. "Survey of the use and outcome of confrontational and non-confrontational training methods in client-owned dogs showing undesired behaviors." Applied Animal Behaviour Science 117, no. 1-2 (2009): 47-54. Summary: This study emphasizes the importance of proper training and socialization in dogs and how it affects their behavior. It particularly highlights how positive reinforcement is crucial in training dogs. Link: Survey of the use and outcome of confrontational and non-confrontational training methods in client-owned dogs showing undesired behaviors

Patronek, Gary J., Margaret Slater, and Amy Marder. "Use of a number of different media sources to identify and characterize dog bite incidents." Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217, no. 6 (2000): 836-840. Summary: This study analyzes how media bias and sensationalism contribute to the negative portrayal of certain dog breeds, particularly Pitbulls. Link: Use of a number of different media sources to identify and characterize dog bite incidents

Kaspersson, Maria. "The Dangerous Dogs Act: The Malleability of Public Perceptions and the Influence of Interest Groups." The Modern Law Review 77, no. 6 (2014): 942-971. Summary: This article discusses the ineffectiveness of breed-specific legislation (BSL) and how it fails to address the root causes of dog attacks. It also highlights how interest groups can influence public perception and legislation. Link: The Dangerous Dogs Act: The Malleability of Public Perceptions and the Influence of Interest Groups

Sacks, Jeffrey J., Leslie Sinclair, Julie Gilchrist, Gail C. Golab, and Randall Lockwood. "Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998." Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217, no. 6 (2000): 836-840. Summary: This study provides data on breeds involved in fatal human attacks, highlighting the importance of proper context and the role of human factors in such incidents. Link: Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998

USA Today. "Arizona woman killed in dog attack; authorities say the dog will be euthanized." June 26, 2023. Summary: This news article reports on a fatal dog attack in Arizona, exemplifying how media coverage can contribute to breed stigmatization. Link: Arizona woman killed in dog attack; authorities say the dog will be euthanized

—The Critical Skeptic, GPT-3.5-emulated.

[iamactivedoggy]

Embrace Comfort and Humor with the Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Throw Pillow!

Are you a proud pitbull lover looking to add a touch of humor and style to your living space? Look no further because we have the perfect solution for you! Introducing our Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Throw Pillow.

This throw pillow is not your ordinary home decor item. With its vibrant neon design featuring the iconic blue nose pitbull, it's sure to catch the eye and bring a smile to your face. It's a unique and playful way to showcase your love for these incredible dogs while adding a dash of humor to your home.

But our throw pillow doesn't just offer visual appeal; it's also incredibly comfortable. Made from high-quality materials, it provides a soft and cozy feel that's perfect for lounging on the couch, resting on your favorite chair, or even decorating your pet's bed. You'll find yourself irresistibly drawn to its plush comfort day after day.

Whether you're a pitbull enthusiast yourself or know someone who is, this funny throw pillow makes a fantastic gift. Surprise a fellow dog lover with a unique and memorable present that celebrates their passion for pitbulls. It's a guaranteed conversation starter and an amusing addition to any living space.

By purchasing our Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Throw Pillow, you're not just acquiring a stylish home accessory, but also supporting our mission to promote responsible pet ownership and advocate for pitbull welfare. So, why not make a positive impact while adding comfort and humor to your surroundings?

Don't miss out on this limited edition throw pillow! Visit our website or head to our store to grab yours today and embrace the comfort and humor of our Blue Nose Pitbulls - Bluenose Pitbull Puppy - Neon American Pit Dog Funny Throw Pillow. Get ready to elevate your home decor with a playful twist!

Happy shopping!

[tenerifeweekly]

DinoSol Foundation donates 9,000 kilos of food to animal shelters

DinoSol Foundation donates 9,000 kilos of food to animal shelters

Foundation DinoSun��concerned about the welfare and protection of homeless animals”, has donated throughout this year, a total of 9,000 kg of food for the protectors and animal shelters of the Archipelago. Right now, The entity collaborates with 15 associations from Gran Canaria, Lanzarote and Tenerife. Among these animal protectors and shelters are Asociación Life4 Pitbulls Canarias; ADA Gran…

[mensfactory]

Karma 2022 GS-6 EV ‘Mr.305 Edition’

This particular premium four-wheeler, which will go under the gavel at Barrett-Jackson’s Scottsdale auction this Saturday, features a number of “personal touches”.

The Car was custom built for Mr. 305 himself. It’s even been christened the 305 Edition in reference to the singer’s nickname and the Miami area code from which he hails.

You can expect special badging and door sills inscribed with “Mr. 305,” along with two motivational quotes on the dash. One reads “The biggest risk you take is not taking one,” while the other says “Patience passion and perseverance equals success.”

Pitbull’s touches aside, the GS-6 is one impressive sedan. Under the hood, it’s equipped with a 1.5-liter three-cylinder DOHC turbocharged engine developed for the BMW i8 and two motors powered by a 28 kW lithium-ion battery pack. Together, that gives the 5,000-pound plug-in a gutsy 536 horses and 550 ft lbs of torque, as well as a range of 360 miles. It can also fully charge in just 36 minutes, according to the automaker.

The best part is that all proceeds from this sale will go toward the Selfless Love Foundation and the SLAM Foundation. Selfless Love is a non-profit working to improve the child welfare system, while SLAM aims to improve education in underserved communities.

@slamfoundation /  Selfless Love Foundation

[yourladyindank]

Pitbulls

So someone’s question on a different post hath revealed unto me that I’ve never made a post on what a pitbull is!

So here are a few examples of Pitbulls

“But Key! They all look so different! What’s the breed standard??”

THERE ISNT ONE

A pitbull is not a breed. It is a term used to describe several breeds and mixbreeds. The purebreds included include American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, American Bully, and Staffordshire Bull Terrier and sometimes the American Bulldog. All mixed breeds with a “pitbull like appearance” also count, whether they have bully blood or not. Even if they DONT look like a bully breed but have bully blood in them, that’s also a pitbull.

So a pitbull is anything with bully breed blood and/or anything that LOOKS like it may have bully breed blood.

Hence why data about them really isn’t fair! Because rather than a single breed, they’re pitting a broad category against other singular breeds. That’s like comparing cat attacks to palm cockatoo bites. It’s just not fair.

[poisonousflower3]

Hi guys, so I just took my dog Chico under my complete care because of how neglectful my uncle (his original owner) has been. Now that he is under my care I’ve taken him to the vet because of these masses on his penis that’s started bleeding. They’re not sure if it’s an infection or skin cancer and to rule out the latter we need to perform a biopsy. I could afford this recent trip along with the medicine but the surgery and the medicine needed for all the aftercare would cost me $1100 and that’s something me and my family don’t have lying around. I’ve set up a gofundme page and any donations or support such as spreading this would be so so so helpful. I appreciate any kind of support and thank you all for this. My family and I have lost our previous dog to cancer and we don’t want to experience it again. Please if you donate be sure to message me so I can thank you personally.

Thank you!

gofundme