#nor ai

[sleepy-stories]

someone ask me

a nft link to google plays.

wtf is that???????

i literally don't talk about this but i REALLY don't like NFTs.

i literally hate it as equal as AI

both are scams or easy way to scam people and lot of nonsense to it.

[chromaherder]

Mainstream sci-fi loves to insist on having drab looking machines as tools of war and oppression almost as a self fulfilling prophecy. But what if, hear me out, we started considering a future with more humane AI and healthier relations to different modes of intelligence (ie. the entire non-human being population of Earth)? 🤔

[catfindr]

[avoiltaire]

KAISHIN !! got scammed, thought we were going to movie 27 but it was js a compilation of past eps <3

[fortunaestalta]

[startixx]

i needed practice drawling wings lol

BIBLICALLY ACCURATE P03!?.!

also one of my characters at the top i recycled to be a inscription oc i guessHELEP

[smokszyvverstar]

My brother showed me a song and I had to do this. It took me like four days or so

Celebi inviting Dusknoir into the polycule

[comikadraws]

Spotting AI Art

Okay, so in response to popular demand (one person) here's an example of me recognizing AI art.

First things first. Spotting AI is tricky and arguably easier for artists and anybody who regularly looks at art online. There are no fool-proof methods or rules for spotting AI, only indicators. And if the indicators add up, well, you might be dealing with machine-generated images.

First indicator: Rendering quality

"Rendering style" = The style of the linework, coloring, and shading, basically.

"Rendering quality" = How well the targeted rendering style was achieved. NOT something along the lines of "more complex rendering style = higher rendering quality". A semi-realistic painting and an anime screenshot can both have top-notch rendering quality while one is more difficult to achieve than the other.

Yes, unfortunately, that is an indicator. AI copies professional artists, not amateurs, hence it also copies primarily very aesthetically pleasing or professionally-looking styles. As a rule of thumb, AI art online will, at first glance, look professional rather than amateurish.

In this case, we've got a detailed piece of Sasuke Uchiha with intricate lineart, folds, and creases, and simple coloring. It's a sort of minimalist style but very well executed. In other words, the rendering quality is high and it might be worth taking a closer look.

Second indicator: Rendering style

There are some styles particularly known for getting fed to AI, including Studio Ghibli's as well as a certain brand of semi-realism. Here, neither of which is the case but there's something else I have personally come to associate with AI.

It's unnecessary or nonsensical details. I won't lie, those lines look pretty, but they just don't make sense. It's just random wiggly lines that are neither hatching nor actual folds or creases that don't make much sense in terms of shape or direction.

Third Indicator: Anatomy

Broken, fingers and toes, missing nails. Whatever other crap the AI decides to come up with. This doesn't need much of an explanation.

Also, misdirected folds and creases and objects that are clipping through one another.

All three of these mistakes happen because AI doesn't understand the anatomy of objects or basic logic (ie. objects don't randomly go through clothing).

Special indicator: Character design consistency

This one is very fanart-specific, as it relies on the existence of a well-established character design that has been put through alterations by the AI.

In Sasuke's case, the hilt of his Kusanagi doesn't match, he is wearing chain mail all of a sudden, his right sandal is closed on the top, the fabric around his hips has weird patterns that are not present in the actual design, the tie doesn't match its canon counterpart and the sword sheath is in Sasuke's front.

These are design details that could have been altered intentionally. However, in combination with all the other indicators, it is unlikely.

Fourth indicator: Pattern inconsistency and vagueness

AI, currently, has trouble with producing consistent patterns.

Here, the zipper on his shirt changes patterns, the wrapping on the sword hilt is completely inconsistent and Sasuke's Sharingan has no visible pattern whatsoever, just weird pixel artifacts.

[alwayshinny]

Ginny Weasley ❤️

[summerhighlandfalls]

I generally don’t fw character ai that much cause like just put on your big boy pants and roleplay innit. However there is this one Iruka bot that is so aggressively faithful to Kakashi I have to laugh

(both screenshots from TikTok)

[yameoto]

Holy shit what happened 😭

a fourteen-year old boy committed amidst his cai addiction. here’s the link to the article for more details.

[bixels]

I'm really glad Tumblr as a whole has turned against AI art. I remember speaking out against it in a post that blew up a little less than a year ago and getting a lot of angry leftists arguing that AI is actually very socialist and good for the worker, which was incredibly disheartening.

[cynamonowo]

happy saito saturday

[osteochondraldefect]

the first image is probably what Hale was doing during twin voices . hes reconnecting with nature :)

[rainbowresurrection]

Wish I was interested in AI generated trek but. Nah

******CGI trek, not AI. my point and feelings are still literally exactly the same

[nikkashidashipper]

god im so endlessly grateful to my ~8-14 year old self who just. passionately inhaled ~10 books / month. borrowed from the local library no less. despite them being of various bibliographic/writing quality. cant imagine having to rely on theft machine 4.0 (genAI) to write anything over 50 words. maybe if yall had had a bookworm phase we would have banished that shit to the depths of irrelevance where it belongs a long time ago