#inverse square law

[rbrooksdesign]

"DMT_56," digital + acrylic, May 28, 2024, Reginald Brooks

DMT = Divisor (Factor) Matrix Table

The BIM (BBS-ISL Matrix), is basically a subset of the DMT. Unlike the DMT that contains ALL the natural numbers, the BIM's Inner Grid only contains EVENs ÷4 and ODDs that are Non-Primes.

However, for any given Mersenne Prime-Perfect Number pairing, all 10 of its defining parameters can be located on the BIM, so it is not all that surprising that they can also be found on the DMT!

x, x², y, y², z, z², xy, xz, yz, p

Except for p=Prime, all the other algebraic parameters have a geometric counterpart. And as they are all inter-related parts of that geometry as well as being related by strict algebraic calculation, knowing any one parameter immediately lets you know (calculate/geometrically draw) any and all of the other parameters.

The key difference is that on the DMT, one must include the Running Sums (∑) along with the tables proper values to see all 10 of the parameters.

Is it no wonder that the Universe(s) is/are an entangled fractal that is self-aware!

more__

[annisrealandsoami]

Can someone tell me if I’m understanding shit correctly?

I’m pleading with the science-y gods of tumblr.

So inverse-square law

So there is a light source or light source equivalent shining down on to planes. The light hit proportionally. (Like if there is a tiny square and the light hits point a, the square under that that is slightly bigger has a point that matches up in placement with point a, idk if that’s clear)

Hypothetically, the light would get weaker from its source.

Why am I asking? 2 am wiki search because of the Magnus Protocol.

I think I’m right but I can’t exactly ask anyone who would know. So tumblr?

[berf-a-smurf]

What’s funny about the Butterly Effect is that the Inverse Square Law exists 🤫

[truphysics]

Intensity

Introduction to Intensity In physics, intensity is a measure of the energy flux, or the power per unit area. It is commonly used to describe various phenomena such as light, sound, and electric fields. It quantifies how much energy passes through a specific area in a given time period. Mathematical Definition of Intensity In the most general sense, the intensity ($I$) is defined as the power…

[kenleephotography]

Inverse Square Law made easy for photographers! No, really!

The Inverse Square Law is simple. No, really. And it can help your lighting. I’ll describe it in simple terms. No charts, no math. Sounds good? Let’s do it! I stood farther back from this abandoned naval base bunker to illuminate much of it equally. Still, you can see a bit of the light falling off on the left side since I was at an angle. Stand farther back! Just like anything else, light…

[superpte]

Gravity Theory So Far

Buridan held that planets turned around the sun from inertia, pulled in by what would become gravity (circa 1350 CE). No doubt studying canon balls’ trajectory helped in the following centuries. By 1600 CE Kepler knew that masses attracted each other, and exactly reciprocally so… and inversely to the distance between them (it’s actually the square of the inverse). Gravity was theorized to be…

[silver-grasp]

Please I have a presentation on multipulse rectifiers to write. Brain can we please think about that and not over-analyze the physics of Liu Sang's hearing again.

[in-sightjournal]

Ask A Genius 1061: The Hindemburg Melão Jr. Session 2, More on Dark Matter and Collapsed Matter

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: Hindemburg Melão Jr. further asks, “Regarding the answer about dark matter, the evidence suggests different properties than what would result from the collapse of baryonic or leptonic matter objects. For example: gravitational effects (produced by dark matter) are very spread out, rather than concentrated, as would be natural if it was generated from the collapses of…

[sirfrogsworth]

If you have seen Ted Lasso you may have noticed these unusual microphones used by the football commentators.

Despite being a microphone nerd, I had never seen anything like them before. So I decided to go into research mode and discovered these microphones are quite fascinating.

They are called "Lip-Ribbon" or "Commentator's" microphones.

They were specially designed by the BBC in the 1950s for extremely noisy environments. Soccer Football stadiums have peaked at 130 decibels so they needed something that would not get overwhelmed in that circumstance.

They use several very clever techniques to make sure only the voice is picked up and everything else is rejected.

First, they use a bidirectional polar pattern.

That means it will accept sound from two directions, but reject any sound coming in from the sides. And since the diaphragm is only exposed on one side, that helps reject sound coming from the other direction.

Next, the microphone is not very sensitive so you literally have to hold it up to your lips (hence "lip-ribbon") in order for your voice to have enough sound energy to vibrate the diaphragm.

That top part rests directly on your lip and there is a little pop filter to keep your plosives in check.

There is a built-in high pass filter so it rejects any sound below the frequencies typically used by the human voice.

But my favorite trick... a labyrinthian internal baffle system.

(I found a diagram of this when researching but then I lost the tab and I cannot find it again. So you'll just have to accept this crude photoshop I did in 30 seconds to help you understand.)

Sound is energy. And that energy is diminished the farther it travels. The inverse square law for sound states that the intensity of sound decreases by approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the sound source. Sound also diminishes when it reflects off a surface.

That is a very sciency way of saying... make sounds go through a tiny maze and only sounds with the most energy will prevail.

So if you have your lip pressed up against the front of the mic, your voice's energy will make it through the labyrinth of baffles without issue. But every other sound in the stadium will have a much harder time getting through.

These mics may even be vuvuzela-proof.

And even more amazing... this microphone was designed in the 1950s and they have yet to create anything better for incredibly noisy environments.

Isn't that neat?

I think it is neat.

[yosh-iro]

watching vids debunking flat earth and other conspiracy shit is so fun :)

[rbrooksdesign]

"EDMT-#23," digital, Oct. 2024, Reginald Brooks

[annisrealandsoami]

Also because I like explaining and I can not sleep, here why this is relevant to tmagp.

Episode 19. The statement is from 1684, and it is coming from Robert Hooke. If you search up what happened in 1684, click on the wiki, scroll down to event, you see that in January, Robert Hooke claimed to have enlightening conversation where he ‘derived’ inverses square law.

So the fears have been compared to the color wheel, in tma by Gerry. Colors are just light(it’s how perceived light).

I’m thinking that the inverse square law describes how the fears are landing in this new dimension. Proportionally, however the space is larger thus different. Also the light ‘geometrically dilutes’ making the fears less potent.

But I am not sure if I’m right, which is why I’m asking.

Also, with the different dimension, there could be other ‘lights’ in play here, but I don’t know enough about how that would work.

I’m sorry if this sounds like nonsense. Science has never been my strong suit. Also it is 3 am.

Can someone tell me if I’m understanding shit correctly?

I’m pleading with the science-y gods of tumblr.

So inverse-square law

So there is a light source or light source equivalent shining down on to planes. The light hit proportionally. (Like if there is a tiny square and the light hits point a, the square under that that is slightly bigger has a point that matches up in placement with point a, idk if that’s clear)

Hypothetically, the light would get weaker from its source.

Why am I asking? 2 am wiki search because of the Magnus Protocol.

I think I’m right but I can’t exactly ask anyone who would know. So tumblr?

[burnthybread]

i so tired

[truphysics]

Inverse Square Law

Introduction In physics, the inverse square law refers to any physical quantity or strength that is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity. This law applies to diverse phenomena, from gravity and electric fields to light and sound. Mathematical Formulation of an Inverse Square Law Mathematically, the inverse square law is written as: $ F…

[patricia-taxxon]

there probably arent giant sea monsters on europa, sorry. something to do with the inverse square law

[drnikolatesla]

Reviving Tesla’s Dream: The Future of Wireless Power Transmission

“My project was retarded by the laws of nature. The world was not prepared for it. It was too far ahead of time. But the same laws will prevail in the end and make it a triumphal success.” – Nikola Tesla

In the early days of radio technology, there was a crucial decision point that split wireless technology into two distinct paths. One path, pursued by Marconi and others, focused on electromagnetic wave transmission. The other path, championed by Nikola Tesla, aimed to minimize electromagnetic waves and use the Earth itself for energy transmission. While the world predominantly embraced the former, Tesla’s innovative approach was largely forgotten. Let’s explore Tesla’s lost art.

Tesla's wireless power transmission system, often known as his "Magnifying Transmitter," was a pioneering approach to sending electrical energy over long distances. Unlike today’s wireless technologies, which rely on electromagnetic waves, Tesla's design aimed to transmit energy through the earth, which he believed was more efficient.

Tesla showcased his system’s potential during his 1899 experiments in Colorado Springs. He successfully transmitted energy through the ground, illuminating bulbs about a mile away from the transmitter. Tesla saw this as a matter of engineering: just as a machine that can throw a rock 5 feet can be engineered to throw it 1,000 feet, he believed his system could be adjusted to transmit power across any distance on Earth.

Modern wireless technologies, such as radio, Wi-Fi, and cellular networks, use electromagnetic waves that spread outward from a source. These waves lose strength according to the inverse square law, which means signal strength decreases with the square of the distance from the source. This energy loss is a significant limitation for long-distance communication and power transmission.

Tesla’s vision was quite different. He recognized that while electromagnetic waves were effective for communication, they were inefficient for transmitting large amounts of power. As he put it, “I only used low alternations, and I produced 90 percent in current energy and only 10 percent in electromagnetic waves, which are wasted.” Tesla aimed to minimize electromagnetic radiation, which he considered to be energy-draining. Instead, he focused on transmitting energy through the earth, which he believed was more efficient and recoverable.

Tesla's system utilized a large coil known as the "Magnifying Transmitter," which generated a high-voltage, low-frequency current. This design featured significant self-inductance and minimal capacitance, producing a strong resonant effect. By accumulating and directing massive amounts of energy with minimal losses, Tesla aimed for efficient power transmission. As he explained, “I accumulate in that circuit a tremendous energy... I prefer to reduce those waves in quantity and pass a current into the earth, because electromagnetic wave energy is not recoverable while the earth current is entirely recoverable, being the energy stored in an elastic system.”

The scientific principles of Tesla's system include:

1. Resonant Circuits: Tesla's system used resonant circuits, tuning the primary and secondary coils to the same frequency. This resonance allowed for efficient energy transfer between coils, amplifying energy while minimizing losses.

2. Self-Inductance: A key component of Tesla’s system was self-inductance. A large coil with high self-inductance generated a strong magnetic field essential for creating high-voltage, low-frequency current. Self-inductance helped store energy in the coil’s magnetic field, critical for high power levels.

3. Capacitance: Tesla’s design involved large capacitors to store electrical energy. Capacitance was kept small compared to self-inductance to achieve desired resonant effects. The capacitors would discharge rapidly, creating high-voltage pulses for transmission through the earth.

To construct a system similar to Tesla’s, he advised:

1. Low Frequency, High Voltage Design: Build a large Tesla coil to generate high voltages at low frequencies. Ensure the design minimizes electromagnetic radiation and focuses on efficient energy transfer into the ground.

2. Loose Coupling for Resonance: Use loose coupling between the primary and secondary coils to achieve significant resonant rise. The coils should be inductively linked but not too close to avoid direct energy transfer.

3. Earth Connection: Establish a deep, effective ground connection to allow the transmitter to send electrical currents into the earth, utilizing its natural conductive properties.

4. Minimizing Radiation: Design the system to suppress electromagnetic radiation, aiming to retain energy within the circuit and direct it into the ground. Tune the system to maximize energy storage and transfer.

5. Energy Storage and Discharge: Incorporate large capacitors for storing and rapidly discharging energy to create high-voltage, low-frequency oscillations.

Tesla’s system faced significant challenges, including the need for large, expensive equipment. In 1914, he estimated the cost of his "Magnifying Transmitter" at $450,000—around $15 million today. These financial constraints prevented him from fully realizing his dream and unfortunately led to his public image as a mad scientist with unrealistic future visions. However, the potential applications of his system are vast, from global wireless power transmission to reducing infrastructure costs and powering remote areas. With ongoing advancements in technology, Tesla’s vision may be within reach.

Tesla’s system presents an alternative approach to wireless energy transmission, focusing on efficiency and long-distance power transfer over the broad dispersal of electromagnetic waves. While modern technologies have advanced in different ways, Tesla’s principles—especially his focus on resonant circuits and earth currents—provide valuable insights into alternative methods of energy transmission. Exploring these principles today could lead to innovative applications, such as more efficient long-distance power transmission or new energy transfer methods.