#mersenne prime squares | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

itsgerges · 17 days ago

Text

Best regards

The Sun Is Created Based On The Planets Motions

My Research Presentation

I- Major Problems In The Physics Book

(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System

(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition

(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis

(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

II- Research Methodology

III- My 5 Equations

The Equations Prove Planets Creation and Motions Data Is Defined By Geometrical Rules (NO Random Creation)

IV- The Research Discovery

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field- Moreover- There's No Gravitational Field

V- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies

VI- The Research Hypothesis

The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- Instead- The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies- And The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- Means- The Sun Rays Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total- Shortly- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created After All Planets Creation And Motion Because The Sun Is The Result Of The Planets Motions

AND the research discovery tells (The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies-Moreover- There's No Gravitational Field) - means – The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions Energies –

That explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body for that the energy out of the sun is so greater than the energy inside the sun (the energy comes from the gravitational waves which are produced by the planets motions energies total)

The Sun Rays Creation Process Summary

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim The Sun Rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- also –No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states.

Here we have five questions to answer

How can the gravitational waves be produced by the planets motions energies?

How can the gravitational waves move by speed of light?

How can the gravitational waves motions produce a light beam?

Can The Planets Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

Can The Sun Creation Data Depends On The Planets Motions?

Let's answer in following

1st Question

How Can The Gravitational Waves Be Produced By Planets Motions Energies?

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this motion energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- we know- fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)

Shortly- the planets move and their motions create waves in the space and each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

AND the planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND in Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity= 205.8 km/s where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

NOW the unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s) is the gravitational wave-

The scientists discovered these waves in the space and they called them (gravitational waves) supposing these waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- BUT Planet motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves – because no other place is found to store planet motion energy in it -means- even if There's NO Gravitational field at all there's a strong reason to find waves in the space because these waves are created by the planets motions energies

Note- I refute the sun gravitational field theory- and prove the sun has no massive gravity and also NO planet moves by the sun gravity

The Conclusion

The Unified Wave Its Velocity 205.8 Km/S Is The Gravitational Wave

Notice - the new article still believes that the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field- I refuse this idea and prove the waves are produced by the planets motions energies but I need the article because it tells the waves can move by speed of light and can produce the light beam where I suppose the sun rays is created by this method

The Answer Of The Questions No. (2) And No. (3)

2ndQuestion

How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light? AND

3rd Question

How Can The Gravitational Waves Motions Produce A Light Beam?

What Do We Have?

We have One unified wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s

What Do We Need?

We need to accelerate the unified wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and this wave should produce (A Light Beam)

We know the light beam is produced from (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light)

Technically- How To Solve This Problem?

We Need To Square The Wave Velocity

Let's see my hypothesis (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity) – the waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the abstract provides strong proves for these reflections and more proves are found in the paper- the waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data and I suppose – the waves reflection causes also to square the waves velocity - now let's see if this hypothesis can solve the problem

(a)

The unified wave velocity is 205.8 km/s

The waves reflection causes to square this velocity and by that

(205.8)^2 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect for speed=99% of speed of light=297000 km/s

I proved the solar system has relativistic effects caused by a speed = 99% of speed of light=297000 km/s and for that the rate (7.1) controls 40% of all planets data –I prove this fact in (Item No. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)

let's discuss the equation

The unified wave moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected and that caused to square its velocity (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42354 km/s

But the rate (7.1) which is Lorentz length contraction effect, this rate caused to increase the speed (42354 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s= speed of light)

Here the rate (7.1) causes to increase the distance (42354 km to be 300000 km) because the waves reflection caused to reflect the geometrical effects – for that the rate (7.1) which should cause contraction for distances- this rate itself causes to increase the distances as a result for the geometrical effects reflection-

By that- the speed 42354 km/s is increased to be 300000 km/s = Speed of light

Now we have unified wave (a gravitational wave) moves by speed of light

(b)

Now we have a gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

This wave is reflected one more time

The gravitational wave reflection causes to square its speed by that – the wave speed was = speed of light (C=300000 km/s) before the reflection and after the reflection this speed will be (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)

The light beam is produced from this value (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)

Now we know how the unified wave (205.8 km/s) can be accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and how this wave can produce a light beam

(c)

Can The Gravitational Wave Be Accelerated By The Velocity Gradual Increasing?

NO Never

Now we know the unified wave (gravitational wave) is accelerated by the squaring of its velocity by the wave reflection- but the question asks if the wave acceleration gradually is possible also! NO Impossible

The unified wave can never be accelerated gradually- only –by the squaring the wave velocity the acceleration can be done- but why?

the gravitational wave moves by speed of light before to produce the light beam- if the speed is increased gradually that means the wave speed will be 97% of speed of light and then be 98% of speed of light and then be 99% of speed of light (as examples)–but these speeds cause relativistic effects in the solar system- the relativistic includes (Lorentz length contraction effect)

the length contraction causes to contract the distances and lengths with the rate 7.1

by that the distances will be contracted and by that some distances will be longer than the others- BUT- the planets motions energies are produced based on motions through distances- that will cause the planets energies to be scattered from one another and can NOT be unified into one unified wave or energy – means- the planets motions energies will be scattered in the space but never be unified in one unified wave or energy and by that the total energy will never be produced and that will prevent to accelerate the waves (because no energy for more acceleration) and by that the wave will never move by speed of light and of course will never produce any light beam

The main requirement to produce the light beam by the planets motions energies is to gather all energies together in one point because planet motion energy is small energy and it's necessary to gather all planets motions energies together to be sufficient to produce the sun rays- Shortly- technically- if the wave velocity is accelerated gradually the wave will never move by speed of light

The Conclusion

The Gravitational Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity

This is the main useful result from the wave reflection -without the squaring of the wave velocity no acceleration can be done and by that the gravitational wave will never move by speed of light and of course will never produce any light beam

THE SUN POINT CREATION

The sun point of space has geometrical features enable to produce the sun rays and that means – the sun rays can be created only in the sun corona and far from the sun NO light beam can be created – let's see the sun geometrical features in following

(i)

The Sun Point Is A Stationary Point Its Velocity 1 km/s = Zero Approximately

This is the main feature and the most important one – Why?

Because all motions are done relative to the sun point of space – for example- Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s – that means- Pluto moves by 4.7 km/s relative to the sun point of space – Shortly- the whole solar system is in motion (space and planets are in motion) but the sun point is stationary (static point moves by velocity 1 km/s = Zero approximately) Means- the solar system is similar to a sea of water and the sun is similar to a vortex or whirlpool found on the sea page – the vortex doesn’t move with the sea waves -Shortly- the sun point of space is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-

Example – Venus moves by 35 km/s that means Venus moves by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space – also we know Venus motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity 35 km/s – means- these waves move by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space-

(ii)

The gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) that means the gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) relative to the sun point of space

Here we understand why the sun point should be stationary- because- the gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and the sun is stationary point moves by (1 km/s = Zero approximately)- we know the gravitational wave CAN NOT move by any speed GREATER than speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- and we know – the wave reflection will square the relative speed between the wave and the sun – means- the different speed between the wave and the sun-

The squaring of the speed will be done for the different speed between the wave motion speed and the sun motion velocity – if this different speed is less than speed of light (C=300000 km/s) the squaring of the velocity will never produce the value (C^2=squared speed of light) from which the light beam is created – means- No Light Beam Can Be Created-

The idea is clear

The wave can't move by greater than speed of light and the different velocity should be equal speed of light for that the sun point of space should be stationary moves by (ZERO motion = 1 km/s = Zero approximately)

Shortly if the sun point of space moves by any higher velocity than (Zero approximately = 1 km/s) NO light beam can be created

The problem here is that- the space is in motion as the sea of water – how to create this stationary point let's answer in following

(iii)

The planets were found before the sun creation and the planets revolve around a point in space (any point in space) the revolution creates two velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value opposite in direction- the total be Zero- means- the revolution motion creates a stationary point in the revolution center-

By That -the sun point of space is created as a stationary point- and the sun point is the only stationary point in the solar system- for that all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-

4th Question

Can The Planets Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

The question asks (How Can The Planets Motions Energies Total To Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?) – the question is logical because

Planet motion energy (1/2 mv^2) is so small energy and the sun rays energy is massive energy for that- It's Logical Question To Know How Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

Let's answer in following

(1)

The secret is the rates of time using-

Means- the planets motions use different rates of time- by that- the planets motions energies can be accumulated during long period of time to produce massive energy sufficient to produce the sun rays – let's give examples

Example No. (1)

(One Solar Day Of The Sun Clock = 365.25 Solar Days Of The Earth Clock)

By this rate of time– The Earth motion energy for one complete year can be used by the sun in one solar day – in fact- the solar planets motions energies total during one complete year (365.25 solar days) is accumulated and stored in one energy and be used by the sun motion on one solar day that causes to accumulate massive energy to be used (notice 1461 days = 365+365+365+366)

Example No. (2)

(One Second Of The Sun Clock=1461Seconds Of The Gravitational Wave Clock)

We remember the unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s -And – the gravitational wave moves in 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km -BUT the Sun clock doesn't see this period 1461 seconds but sees only the period (ONE SECOND) – means-

The distance 300000 km is passed in (ONE SECOND)only for the sun clock– That causes the gravitational wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) relative to The Sun – (the rate of time using and effect is explained in details in item no VII)

5th Question

Can The Sun Creation Data Depends On The Planets Motions?

The sun diameter = Jupiter circumference x π and also

(the sun mass /Jupiter mass)= π x (Jupiter mass/ the Earth Mass) (error 5%) because Jupiter defines The sun creation data with the inner planets

The sun is created from the stored energy in the Earth moon orbit- specifically-the sun is created in the area between the Earth and Mars – for that reason- the sun diameter = 1.392 million km = The Total Lunar Eclipse Umbra Length – please note- the Earth moon orbit is created by Jupiter direct effect on the Earth and Moon motions-

The sun angles depends on the angle 8 degrees for that the sun pole inclination 63.7 degrees =(8)^2 and the sun obliquity is 7.25 degrees where (1/sin8) =7.25 that tells the angle (8 degrees) controls the sun angles – and we know- the angle 8 degrees is the angle on which Pluto orbit is defined where 5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) x cos (8) = 5848 mkm (Pluto Mercury distance) (please review the right triangle based which the planets orbits are defined with my planet orbital distance equation (item no.III)) – the data proves the sun angles are defined based on the solar planets orbits geometrical design- also-notice 25920 mkm =5906 mkm x 4.37 we know that light (300000 km/s) moves in a solar day 86400 seconds a distance 25920 million km and 4.37million km is the sun circumference and 5906 million km is Pluto orbital distance which shows Pluto orbital distance has effect on the sun circumference definition because the sun is created based on the solar system geometrical design that explains why the data in harmony with each other

The sun velocity 2 km/s (the sun circumference 4.37 million km/s and the sun rotation period 25.4 days) this velocity proves the sun is the stationary point in the solar system which is required to create the sun rays –

4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference) = 1.39 mkm (the sun diameter) x 3475 km =12104 km x 406000 km = 12756 km x 384000 km = 6792 km x 2 x 363000 km where 3475 km = the moon diameter and 12104 km = Venus diameter and 12756 km = The Earth diameter and 6792 km= Mars diameter and the distances 363000 km, 384000 km and 406000 km are the distances between the Earth and its moon in perigee, orbital distance and apogee radiuses respectively – the previous data is the total solar eclipse data- means-the total solar eclipse is occurred based on this data- the data explains the sun diameter is created based on deep proportionality with the planets diameters and distances values- that proves the sun diameter is created later because it’s created based on the consideration of all these data-

II- The Solar System Description Refutation

(The Sun Is The Planets Motions Result But The Description Supposes The Sun Is The Planets Motions Reason) and (The Matter Is Created Depending On Its Motion But The Description Supposes The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Motion)

VIII – The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time

IX - The Physicist Wrong Vision Proves

X - The Refutations Of Many Theories In The Physics Book

XI - The Proves For My Theory

(There's A Light Beam Moves By Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second)

XII-The Solar System History And Neptune Orbit Creation

Paper Definitions In Page No. 249

Questions and Answers In Page No. 281

First Item - Major Problems In The Physics Book

(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System

(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition

(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis

(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

First Problem The Physicist wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the matter (mass) as a wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and the physicist searches for this (unit of building)–

For that the physicist divided the matter and found the particles and then the particle is divided into Molecules and the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- for that he divides anything to reach to this building unit-

The Nature System Vision

The Nature designer aims to create INTEGRATION- as the marriage– male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child- For that the matter is created complementary one another-means- The Matter Is Created In Pairs (as Gamma ray 1.2 Mev produces electron and positron)

No building unit- the marriage answers- because in marriage both (male and female) are required and no one is the better–both work together on the same process and give together one result- AND

I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method while the physicist divides the elements one after one (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which the physicist considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process- Shortly- the physicist sees a universe (never be created by the designer)- while the designer created the integration is a goal and created tools to perform this goal (the integration) the physicist destroyed the tools and removed the integration tools while he searched for the building unit which is not found at all – that explains why the physics book is filled with imaginary ideas

NOTICE

Another point shows the physicist wrong vision is (The Planet Motion)

While the solar planets move as gears in one machine and all planets motions are unified into one unified general motion- means- all planets motions are unified and produce one result only (one unified motion)- the physicist supposes each planet motion is independent-by that- in place of one machine of gears moves and produces one unified motion (one result) the physicist told us each planet motion is independent and No unification is found for the planets motions –here – one more time the physicist sees very different picture from the real one- in place of one hand has five fingers the physicist sees five independent moving fingers

Second Problem Planet Motion Energy Definition

How can we define Planet motion energy? the question asks simply (Where's Planet Motion Energy?)- this is a difficult question for the physicist- let's prove that in following

Where's Planet Motion Energy?

Any moving body produces motion energy (1/2 mv^2), means, planet motion also produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this motion energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-

This analysis creates three major difficulties for the physics book – let's see them

First Difficulty

This analysis tells the space has moving waves are produced by planets motions – But- the scientists discovered the gravitational waves and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field- I prove the sun doesn’t produce a gravitational field and has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity – But- here we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?) because planet motion energy has no place to store in except the space -means- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field- shortly- even if there's no gravitational field at all- there's a reason to find waves in the space and these waves are produced by the planet motions energies

that put the question (from what source the gravitational waves are produced?)

I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field (even if found)

Second Difficulty

The analysis tells planet motion energy is stored in the space as moving waves- and the planets move since long periods of time and their motions energies are stored during these long periods of time- means- the planets motions energies total during these long periods must cause to store massive motion energy in the space- now let's ask-where's this stored massive energy? also the energy can NOT be stored in the space forever-so what's happening for this massive stored energy? I prove the sun rays are created from this massive stored energy but regardless my theory in all cases we should find how this massive stored energy be used because it can cause a risk for the solar system stability and in fact can cause an explosion in the solar system

The problem here is that- massive motion energy is stored in the space but no one knows where's this energy and how is it used?

Third Difficulty

Newton Mass gravity definition is wrong- let's explain why

Suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity and we know the moon motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) now let's ask- from what source the moon motion energy is provided? What's the moon motion reason? The mass gravity- means- the mass should provide the motion energy- that means – if The moon moves by the Earth mass gravity that necessitates to decrease the masses of the Earth and the moon by the motion energy- here's the problem- Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass- this decrease is done because of the motion energy

The analysis tells us–the physicist supposes planet motion produces NO energy this is the only one solution for the problems created by the physicist neglect to observe planet motion energy- NOTICE Mass gravity is a fact- it's a bond between two masses – for example- the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity – so if some force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with The Earth- in this case the force causes the Earth to move will provide its motion energy and the moon motion energy also - shortly – Mass gravity can't cause any motion-

Third Problem Mass Gravity Force Analysis

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its internal structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-

Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper.

(iii)

The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- here's the problem- Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-

(iv)

The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the planets initial conditions)- all these are wrong- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and discussed in details in item no. (III)- Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor planets orbits (in item No. III there are more proves for this fact)

Notice –

Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies-

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

THE CONCLUSION

The Sun Doesn't Produce Any Gravitational Field

Fourth Problem The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

In following we compare between the physics book theory about the matter creation and my theory about it- the discussion contains Two points

I- The Physics Book Theory About The Matter Creation

II- My Theory About The Matter Creation

I- The Physics Book Theory About For The Matter Creation

The Matter (Mass) Is Created Independently From Any Outer Motion – means- even if the matter motion is stopped the matter is still found and never be perished (the motion here means the outer motion and not the atoms motions)

The Matter (Mass) Is Motionless By Nature

The Matter (Mass) Needs Mass Gravity Force To Cause Its Motion

The Matter (Mass) Data And Dimensions Are Not Changed By Its Motion

The big bang theory tells planet is created by random creation- means- for example- Jupiter diameter is created by unknown value and Jupiter is collided many times in its history and these collisions caused Jupiter diameter (and mass) to be decreased- as a result – Jupiter diameter current value (142984 km) is found by random process and without any geometrical reason behind- for that- we can't use this known value to discover the creation and motion rules of Jupiter- by that- the big bang theory prevented the researchers to analyze the planets creation data to discover these planets creation and motion facts-

Note – The physicist doesn't use planet data in forming a theory to explain planet motion-for example- Jupiter diameter is 142984 km and the physicist has a theory explains Jupiter motion but if Jupiter diameter is changed into 180000 km the theory will have no change because the physicist doesn't consider Jupiter diameter is a player in its motion- that explains why the big bang theory is wrong because it supposes the change in diameter and mass doesn't cause a change in motion

Shortly- the physics book doesn't tell how the matter is created nor what's the matter nature- we remember Einstein problem in physics generally where he told (All researches in particle electromagnetic properties can't predict this particle behavior in the daily life physics) that shows two different branches of the physics one for the electromagnetic properties and the other for the mass gravity physics

II- My Theory About The Matter Creation - The Matter Main Features Are:

The Matter Is Created In Pairs Means- No Single Matter Is Created -This conclusion depends on Gamma ray experiment -From Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) electron and positron are created- by this experiment- the matter is created in pairs from electromagnetic waves-means-no single matter can be created- the produced pair particles motions depend on each other (or related to each other) (notice the creation system is male and female – two complementary matters-that tells the source of energy must be electromagnetic wave)

The matter is created depending on its motion- means- the motion is found before the matter creation- this conclusion depends on my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity (for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)- means–Planet motion is defined before its creation

Lorentz transformation proves Matter dimensions are effected by high speed motion- also- Lorentz transformation proves the matter and space are created from the same energy for that particle length and the distance both are contracted by the same one equation (Lorentz length contraction effect)

The Matter Is Created Depending On Light Motion –

The Discussion Proves These Features Strongly

The Matter Creation Depends On 5 Main Facts Which Are

Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron

Lorentz Transformation

My Planet Diameter Equation

The Matter Description (note–Matter Description Is Just Explanation For The Facts)

The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference)

Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit

(Item No. i) Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron

From Gamma ray (1.2Mev) one electron and one positron are created- I prove the matter is created by this method- means- the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created

(Item No. ii) Lorentz Transformation

Lorentz transformation tells

If a particle moves by high speed motion (near to speed of light), this particle length would be contracted and its mass would be increased and its time would be dilated

I accept this meaning clearly and find this meaning supports my theory strongly BUT Many physics Books tell the following

(NO Real Change Is Done For Any Particle Data Moves By High Speed Motion But All Changes Are Illusions Of Measurements)-

Means- while a particle is moving by high speed motion and the experiments results show contraction in its length and increasing in its mass and dilation in its time – these changes are just illusions in measurements and the particle itself has no change in any data - tenth of books tell this meaning clearly and with confirmation and the physicist killed Lorentz work and made Lorentz transformation measures illusions and not facts- regardless the empirical proves which supports Lorentz transformation

I refuse these books idea because

The Physics Is The Measurements Science And What's Measured Is The Fact

If no real changes are done how the problem of Michelson and Morelly experiment is solved?- also- Why the synchronous events in one frame can't be synchronous in another (as Einstein stated) where no change is found for any data- the distances are Not contracted nor the time is dilated nor the mass is increased why the events can NOT be synchronous in any frame?

If the particle own data is measured correctly while it moves by my motion velocity and these measurements are suffered from illusions because the particle moves by high velocity motion relative to my motion that means (I'm the universe reference point)

We notice- Lorentz length contraction equation can't distinguish between particle length and a distance, both can be contracted by the same one equation- that supports my theory tells (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same Energy)–

My planet diameter equation proves planet diameter is created depending on this planet motion and also proves the matter and space are created from the same one energy which supports Lorentz transformation

NOTICE

The major importance of Lorentz transformation is

The transformation creates a connection between particle dimensions and its motion means the motion has effect on particle dimensions definition and by that the matter (mass) can't be independent because its existence depends on a motion- shortly (The Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion)

The matter and space are created from the same energy- because- particle length and the distance both are contracted by the same equation (Lorentz length contraction effect) shortly (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same One Energy) (This theory is proved by my planet diameter equation)

(Item No. iii) My Planet Diameter Equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

Discussion

(1)

The Equation Concept Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result- the designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if the Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved

(2)

Matter Definition Based On My Planet Diameter Equation

My equation tells, Planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because it velocity is 5.4 km/s where the velocity is used in the diameter definition equation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- how can that be possible? let's answer in following

The original energy was in motion and planet matter is created from this moving original energy and planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after Planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data and dimensions are created that's why Planet data is in full harmony with its motion features- and that explains how planet diameter is created based on its velocity

Shortly- the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle dimensions depend on the blood motion- similar to that- the matter dimensions depend on this energy motion from which this matter is created-

NOTICE this description also tells (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) Newton is wrong, because planet moves by the energy from which this planet is created- we realize that Planet creation and motion should be done by one force (one energy) because if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken by its motion because the planet in this case moves against its internal structure-simply- Planet moves with the energy which caused this planet creation-

Based on that– The Matter Is Not Motionless By Nature- The Matter moves with the energy from which this matter is created-

(3)

Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion

This is the meaning I try to prove-if the motion is stopped the matter will be perished- again the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature body- if the blood motion is stopped the muscle will be perished- this is the fact-

Based on that- Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s if Neptune stops its motion Neptune diameter and matter will be perished-

The fact I try to prove is (The Matter Creation Depends On Its Motion) – Lorentz transformation and my planet diameter equation supports this fact strongly

DEEP DISCUSSION

(4)

The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created

Planet velocity is defined based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) let's prove that

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)

322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)

The idea is understandable – let's summarize it in following

(i)

The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) and

(ii)

Planet data is created depending on its velocity- means- planet velocity is the first data in its creation and based on the velocity all other data is created- as we see in the planet diameter equation, planet diameter and all creation data is created depending on this planet velocity- means- based on (v1/v2) but planet orbital distance is defined based on (v1/v2)^2 and planet orbital period is defined based on (v1/v2)^3

Based on this system planet data is created but we know that planet orbital distance is defined before planet creation and based on the orbit, planet velocity is defined and then all data is defined based on the planet velocity-

(iii)

Now the idea is clear- let's summarize it

The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=322) and planet diameter is created depending on its velocity for that reason planet diameter is created complementary to another planet diameter- let's prove that

341.7 million km = Jupiter diameter 142984 km x Pluto diameter 2390 km

341.7 million km = Jupiter radius 71492 km x Mercury diameter 4879 km (2%)

341.7 million km = Saturn diameter 120536 km x 4 Mars diameter 6792 km (4%)

341.7 million km = Uranus diameter 51118 km x0.5 Earth diameter 12756km(5%)

341.7 million km = Neptune diameter 49528 km x 2 The Moon diameter 3475 km

Clearly we see the planets diameters are complementary one another- because the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created

Notice (1)

Suppose the physicist can create a type of single matter which has no complementary can that disprove my theory tells (The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created?) NO NEVER

Because- the matter is created from the original energy and the energy uses a system depends on matters in pairs complementary one another- shortly- the original energy is the main player and the matter is a form selected to be used by the energy- if the physicist created any type of matter which can't be used by the original energy this created matter will be neglected simply because the energy uses matters in pairs

Notice (2)

Kelper stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity) and the planets velocities are complementary one another- but- the planets orbits are not complementary one another by that how the planets orbits are not complementary but the velocities are complementary but still the velocities definition depend on the orbits? This question is answered in item no. (vi)

(Item No. iv) The Matter Nature Description

(1)

The Matter Is Similar To A Whirlpool (Vortex) Is Found On The Sea Page -

BECAUSE

The matter and space both are created from the same one energy- means- the planets matters and their distances both are created from the same one energy- the matter and space move depending on the motion of this energy from which they are created-

Based on this idea

The space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a distinguished picture different from the space picture and the matter moves by a different velocity from the space motion velocity- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- this explanation shows how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters how is this whirlpool created? and why does its diameter equal = 2 meters? The diameter is created as a result for the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also-

(notice- The Gravitational Waves Prove The Space Has Motion And Not Static)

(2)

The matter also is similar to a body muscle or member which depends on the blood motion

suppose- we examine now a liver of human- the blood motion causes this liver to work perfectly but if the blood motion is changed that would cause changes for the liver cells and job– suppose the blood have some poison the liver will be dead- suppose the blood pressure is raised- shortly - the liver is a piece of body (matter) but it depends on the blood motion and this motion defines this liver dimensions and data-

also–the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle may be so strong as a rock but it depends on the blood motion (similar to that the matter is found depending on the motion of energy from which this matter is created)

(Item No. v) The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference)

I provide proves tell Gamma Ray and Young experiments are used in the solar planets creation – let's remember these experiments

(1st Experiment) Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) can produce electron and positron

(2nd Experiment) the coherence of light experiment (Young Interference)

Let's provide the proves for the using of these two experiments in the planets creation

Gamma Ray Experiment

There are two facts prove this experiment concept is used in the planets creation

First Fact Planet creation data is defined based on its velocity- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity as explained before (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)-means- Planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation process and based on this velocity all planet creation and motion data is created

Second Fact Planet velocity is complementary one another, which is proved by the rule (v1v2= 322 = constant)- that shows the planets data must be complementary one another as I have proved in the diameters values analysis

Shortly – The planets data are complementary one another (similar to the electron and positron are created from Gamma ray)

The Coherence of light Experiment (Young Interference)

There are two facts prove this experiment concept using in the solar system creation

1st Fact

The planets order is typical for Young interference- if we consider planet diameter is equivalent to the fringe breadth by that the planets order be typical for Young interference where the greatest fringe is in the middle (the greatest planet Jupiter) and the fringes breadth is deceased gradually on both sides

(I Proved Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus- so the original inner planets order was Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) which shows gradual decreasing in diameters- the outer planets diameters also is decreased gradually

2nd Fact

There's a coherence of light in the solar system- what does that mean?

Means- while planet orbit has energy of a light beam- another light beam enters this orbit by that there are two light beams in the same orbit- these two light beams create coherence of light- the planets orbits creation explain this fact in details- but here I want to prove this fact by simple direct proof before the planets orbits creation discussion –let's write this proof here

We have seen that the planets velocities are complementary one another by the rule (v1v2=constant=322) and planet all data is created depending on its velocity- by that the planets diameters also follow this rule where (R1R2= constant) as I have proved in my planet diameter equation

Now let's ask – can the planets orbits complementary one another? NO

So- how this rule (v1v2=constant= 322) is found?

By the energy reflection- means- the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection of energy causes the velocities to be reflected on one another and that produced the rule (v1v2=constant= 322)

We note the planets can’t be reflected on each other because the planets are connected with their orbits- and the energy reflection needs freedom in motion- means- this reflection of the planets velocities are done by effect of the energy reflection- please note- the energy reflection is a proved fact in the solar system- this fact is proved by hundreds of the planets data because the energy reflection cause effects on the planets data- shortly- the planets data is created by effects of the energy reflection-

Here we see the coherence of light is created because the orbits have energy where the space is energy and (Another energy is reflected and moved through all orbits and caused to create the planets data) by that each orbit has two energies together- I prove both energies are light beams-for that the two light beams create a coherence of light

I want to say- there are two facts prove the solar system has coherence of light which are the reflection of energy and the planets order

The planets orbits creation explain this theory in details I discuss it in item no. (**)

NOTICE

Please Note – I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars is migrated to its current orbit behind the Earth- by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) here we see planets diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury where Jupiter was the planet beside the Earth- means – the planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Mercury- and the outer planets – the planets diameters also are decreased gradually- as I explained – if we compare planet diameter with fringe- the planets order be typical to Young interference – but – the order is reflected each other –let's see that

The inner planets (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates longer orbital distance – but

The outer planets (Jupiter– Saturn– Uranus– Neptune –Pluto)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates shorter distance

Here we see the orders are reflected one another- but in Young interference there's no reflection- I want to say- the planets orders are reflected because of the sun position- if the sun is not found no reflection will be found- that means- the reflection of energy caused to create the sun in the solar system because the sun creation causes the planets order to be reflected one another- my paper proves the sun is created after all planets creation and motion – and the sun is created by the reflected energy

(Item No. vi) Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit

The solar planets matters and their distances are created from one energy and this one energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed = 1.16 million km per second (The speed is proved strongly and decisively)

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) built the solar system orbits starting from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation- means- all orbits are created before any planet creation- the orbits are created based on each other (this fact is proved by my planet orbital distance equation) after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second before the space creation (In Mercury Orbit) and its speed becomes 300000 km/s after the space creation (in Pluto orbit) as result for the energy consumption in the space creation-

In Pluto orbit - the light could Not move any further to build any more orbits because any additional space creation will consume more energy and that will decrease the light speed to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) – and – No known light moves by speed less than 300000 km/s – means- the light had no energy to move any further after Pluto orbit- for that- the light returns to its origin point (Mercury orbit) for that the light is reflected with speed (300000 km/s) from Pluto orbit to Mercury orbit passing through the built orbits– no energy is required in this motion for that the light beam moves with speed of light (300000 km/s) till Mercury orbit.

Please note- the light (300000 km/s) is reflected from Pluto to Mercury

The reflection of the light beam (300000 km/s) Caused To Create The Solar Planets

Comments

The light (1.16 million km per second) created the orbits with energy means the created orbits have energies- and each planet orbit energy is less than its previous neighbor orbit because the planets velocities are decreased gradually- almost the energy is less by rate 80% because the velocities are rated with (0.8)

Each planet diameter is created based on its orbit energy- the planet is similar to a tree planted in a ground and the planet orbit is this ground- that's why each planet diameter depends on this planet velocity and orbital inclination- please note Mars diameter equation proves this fact because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars diameter is created based on this orbit energy and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one behind the Earth but Mars diameter equation still shows Mars original orbital inclination (5.1degrees) while Mars current orbital inclination is 1.9 degrees- Mars diameter is created based on this inclination (5.1 deg) for that this inclination is seen in Mars diameter equation frequently (please review my planet diameter equation)

The Occurrence Of The Coherence Of Light - The light beam (300000 km/s) is reflected and passed through all created orbits- that shows there two light beams are found in the same area (in any orbit)- because in each orbit there's this orbit energy which is found with the orbit creation by the light (1.16 million km per second) for that we say (Space Is Energy) because any orbit has energy found with its creation- and also the reflected light beam (300000 km/s) passed through all orbits- by that- in any orbit there are two different light beams (two different energies) and these light beams create A Coherence together-

The Amazing Coherence Of Light There's a major interesting point here-the light beam (300000 km/s) created a coherence with the light 1.16 million km per second! BUT HOW?? because the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed and its energy is used for the space creation and the rest energy is this light beam moves by known speed of light (300000 km/s)!! how can the light beam (300000 km/s) meet the original light beam the 1.16 million km per second to create this coherence of light?

Please note- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the major used speed in the solar system data- means- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the secret by which the solar system data can be understood because all data is created as function in this speed-I prove that in the next pages- but this information is written to explain that the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed but its energy still works and causes continuous effect- BUT HOW??

Let's write the answer

The light (300000 km/s) is reflected to move from Pluto to Mercury (while the original light 1.16 million km per second moved from Mercury to Pluto) means the light (300000 km/s) moved in opposite direction for the motion of the original light 1.16 million km per second- MEANS- the light (300000km/s) moved in the opposite direction of space to reach to Mercury- BUT NOT ONLY- in fact- the light (300000 km/s) moved also in the opposite direction OF TIME and moved into its own past – and in past – this light beam (300000 km/s) met the original light beam 1.16 million km per second – and in past – the two light beams created the coherence of light and then this coherence of light results have effects on our present time-

Shortly- the coherence of light in the solar system proves the light beam (300000 km/s) moved on the time-axis and this is an empirical proof for the time-axis motion where the light can move simply on the time axis

Notice – this motion can help us to create the time machine- because- if the light can move into the past that means we may use this motion and take photos of the past events and this will be our time machine which can go into the past and make photos and videos for the past events – even the events since thousands of years we can see in videos or in photos – this motion of light can give us a great option to create our machine of time

Notice the original light beam 1.16 million km per second can not move into the future to meet the light beam (300000 km/s) because in future the original light 1.16 million km per second is NOT found because its energy is consumed in the space creation- but- the light beam (300000km/s) can move into the past because in the past the light beam (300000 km/s) was part in the original light beam 1.16 million km per second and by that the two light beams be found in the same time

Notice – we can not travel ourselves into the past- because planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- as proved by my planet diameter equation- means- the matter is created depending on its motion velocity- and the velocity is a motion in defined direction- the light is free in motion and doesn't forced to move in any direction for that the light has this option to move on the time axis but the matter is created depending on a motion in defined direction (no freedom in motion) for that the matter can't move on the time axis because the motion force the matter to move in a defined direction – the matter moved just to the future– and the matter can't move into the past-

Planet Creation Machine Please note–we see the coherence of light is done by the two light beams 300000 km/s and 1.16 million km per second (because the light beam 300000 km/s can reach to the light 1.16 million km per second by moving into its past)- shortly – here we have 2 light beams in any orbit- and these two light beams cause two motions – we can imagine these two motions are perpendicular on each other – this perpendicular motions create a wave and planet is created as a wave (Particle is a wave also)- that explains how the planets are created

Please note- The reflection of energy is very effective in the solar planets data because the reflection of energy caused the planets to be created- the matter can't be created by the energy of any orbit alone but the reflection of energy adds second energy inside each orbit- by that- two energies are found in any orbit (two light beams) by these two light beams the light coherence is created and also the planets are created as waves-that explains why the planets data prove the reflection of energy because the planets are created by this energy reflection- as when we plant a tree we need a ground and we need seeds to be put in this ground- two players- the planets are created by two energies (two light beams coherence) and for that the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds (300000 km/s) and (1.16 million km per second) as planet velocity definition proves.

Please note the Matter Is Created In Pairs (as electron and positron from Gamma rays 1.2 Mev) – this is the main system of creation but -In planets creation the rule is used with some complex method- the complementary is found for the planets velocities and the planets data is created depending on these velocities- the same concept but the method is more complex- this similar to the creature creation- the cell reproduction is done by split the cell into two new cells- but in higher creatures the reproduction use more complex methods but the cell method is still the base of these complex methods

Please note the previous analysis tries to conclude how the planet matter is created – I put all available facts to reach to this conclusion- the matter real mechanism may be still not clear but many provided facts help to reach to this mechanism- also- we know the main concept behind the matter creation which is (The Matter Is Created In Pairs And Not Single Matter Is Created)

This Concept Is Proved Strongly And Clearly By The Gamma Rays Experiment And The Planets Data

(Item No. vii) The Proves Of The Light Speed 1.16 million km per second

THE SPEED PROVES

In following I prove the speed 1.16 million km per second is found

The paper provides many powerful proves – but - here I refer to 4 proves only

(1st Proof)

Planet Velocity Analysis proves the speed 1.16 million km per second

Data

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)

322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)

Discussion

This is one rule used to define planet velocity- we know this rule (v1v2 = constant =322) – other rules are discussed in planet velocity definition- here we ask only

Why the constant is 322?? Because 1160000 seconds = 3600 x 322 hours

Means – for example

Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance 1.16 million km – and

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance 1.16 million km-

Means- the light moves 1.16 million km but we see it as 1160000 seconds and based on this period the constant 322 hours is defined and based on this constant the planets velocities are defined- means- the planets velocities are defined as functions in the speed 1.16 million km per second

(2nd Proof) the planets orbital circumferences total is defined by light speed 1.16 million km per second- let's prove that

100733 million km = 86400 seconds x 1160000 km/s

100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

86400 seconds = The solar day

Means- light its speed 1.16 million km per second passes in a solar day a distance = 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

The planets data analysis proves that the solar day is the major period of time in the solar system- that because- all planets rotation periods are defined based on it- the paper proves this fact strongly

(3rd Proof)

The planets orbits and orbital distances are created from the energy of the light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- for that- this speed is registered in the distances data – let's prove that in following

Example

778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1160000 km/s x 671 seconds

721 million km (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 1160000 km/s x 629 seconds

Where

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

This example tells that

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) created the distances based on each other- means

The light uses 671 million km (Jupiter Venus Distance) as a period of time 671 seconds to pass the distance 778.6 million km (Jupiter Orbital Distance)

Also -the light uses 629 million km (Jupiter Earth Distance) as a period of time 629 seconds to pass the distance 721 million km (Jupiter Mercury Distance)

By this method the light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances based on each other- means – the distances be created in one network and by one design

the previous data is example for so many other distances let's see them in following

(778.6 / 671)= (721/629) = (629/551)= (2x551/940)= (4900/4188) = (5906/5127)= (5127/4437) = (4345/3717)= 1.16

Where

778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

721 million km = Jupiter Mercury Distance

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

551 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance

940 million km = Earth Orbital Circumference

4188 million km = 2 x 2094 million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

5906 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance

5127 million km = Pluto Jupiter Distance

4437 million km = Mercury Neptune Distance

4345 million km = The Earth Neptune Distance

3717 million km = Jupiter Neptune Distance

The paper provides so many other powerful proves for the speed 1.16 million km

Notice

(1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3

The equation tells, because the solar system is created by light beam its speed 1.16million km per second with its other speed 300000 km/s

For that - the space is created in curved lines (2π) and the time is created based on the solar day (24 hours)- that explains why the planets orbital circumferences total depends on the solar day period

(4th Proof)

300000 = (205.8)^2 x 7.1 where

The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s and I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s the total be 205.8 km/s - the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s)

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect produced by speed 99% of speed of light-

Shortly- the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity for that the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared by the energy reflection

Now (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42354

The rate 7.1 causes to increase the distance from (42354 km) to (42354 x 7.1= 300000 km)- note-although 7.1 is Lorentz length contraction rate but it increases the distances in place of the contraction effect because the reflection of energy causes to reflect the geometrical effects-

shortly the equation (300000=(205.8)^ x 7.1) proves the planets velocities are defined as function in the known speed of light (300000 km/s)

that proves the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds of light –the known speed of light 300000 km/s and the original speed of light 1.16 million km per second.

NOTICE

Lorentz length contraction effect for a velocity 99% of speed of light (297000 km/s) is (7.1) as seen in the equation but the solar system uses this rate with modification

(7.1/100)+ 1 = 1.0725

And this final rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all planets data (distances, periods, axial tilts and other data)- this effect is a proof for the motion by high velocity because this rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all data in the solar system and no explanation except Lorentz length contraction effect- more proves are in (Item No. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)

(Item No. viii) Planet creation depends on light motion

The previous analysis proves planet diameter is created depending on its orbit- specifically- planet diameter depends on its velocity and the velocity depends on its orbit- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation (where planet diameter is created depending on its velocity) and by Kepler statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity) – but-

Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity?

Where I proved no planet moves by the sun gravity- by that the planet orbital distance has no effect on this planet motion or velocity nor planet mass has any effect on its velocity-So - Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? The next data proves there's a connection between planet velocity and its orbit through light motion

DATA

300000 km = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 3600 x 17.73

5906 s x 300000 km/s = 1773 million km

300000 km = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 3600 x 15.43

5144 s x 300000 km/s = 1543 million km ((5144= 4495 x (1.0725)^2)

300000 km = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 3600 x 8.6

2870 s x 300000 km/s = 8600 million km

300000 km = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 3600 x 12.26

4085 s x 300000 km/s = 1226 million km

300000 km = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 3600 x 6.36

2120 s x 300000 km/s = 636 million km

Where

5906 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance

4495 million km = Neptune Orbital Distance

2872 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 x Saturn Orbital Distance

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

Notice

18048 million km (Uranus Orbital Circumference) = 4.4 x 4085 million km

4900 million km (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) = 2.3 x 2120 million km

4.4 = 2.2 x 2 (with 2.3 the error 5%)

Discussion

The data shows each outer planet velocity is related to its orbital distance by effect of the light motion (300000 km/s)- Uranus and Jupiter shows the rate 4.4 which related to Jupiter (3.1 deg Jupiter axial tilt + 1.3 deg Jupiter orbital inclination)- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter that causes the two planets use the same rate.

The data proves the planets motions depend on light motion and explains how the planet orbit defines its velocity

Notice

0.8 = (27.8 /35) = (24.1/29.8) = (10.8/13.1) = (5.4/6.8) = (17.2/21.4) = 19.8/24)

Where

35 km/s = Venus velocity

29.8 km/s = The Earth velocity

27.8 km/s = The moon velocity

13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity

6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity note (10.8 = 5.4)

17.2 hours = Uranus Rotation Period

21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 h Saturn Rotation Period

19.8 hours = 2 x 9.9 h Jupiter Rotation Period

24 hours = The solar day period

The data shows harmony between the planets velocities and their rotation periods

Second Item - Research Methodology

I use the planets data analysis to discover the planets creation and motion facts–

In details- I try to discover how the planet get its data- for example – why Jupiter diameter is 142984 km? why Neptune axel tilt is 28.3 deg? why Pluto orbital period is 90560 days? This method helps greatly to discover the solar system facts let's provide two examples to explain how this method works

Example No. (1)

Why Is The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 Km?

The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 days (the moon day period) the displacements total be = 2.598 million km = 2π x 413600 km

The data tells us the moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km and also it tells, because the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is so long, the moon should revolve around the Earth through this apogee orbit its radius (413600 km) only and can't revolve around the Earth through any more near orbit…

Not Facts

The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km only and the moon revolves around the Earth through near orbits and can reach to perigee radius (363000 km).

How Can The Moon Do That?

The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level by that the real displacement (L) through the orbit be less than (88000 km) because it be (L = 88000 km cos θ), as a result the total displacements be less than (2.598 million km) and that makes the moon orbital apogee radius to be decreased from 413600 km to 406000 km.

We should pay attention for the angle (θ), because this angle controls the moon motion features – where- with the angle (θ) increasing the real displacement (L) be shorter and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits – but –with the angle (θ) deceasing the real displacement (L) be longer and that pushes the moon far from the Earth to more far orbits- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this angle (θ) it tells θ1 = θ0 +1.7 deg where (θ1) = today angle and (θ0) =yesterday angle and 1.7 deg is used as the moon motion degrees per solar day for the equation

Example No. (2)

Can Mars Itself Cause The Earth Moon Creation?

Giant-impact hypothesis tells (NO) – but let's see the planets data analysis

I Suppose - Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus

The order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows correct order in planets diameters (and masses), and orbital distances - BUT – Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) to its current one (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with the Earth in its migration motion – and Mars itself has caused the Earth moon creation- My Mars Migration Theory answers many left questions by Giant-Impact Hypothesis – for example -

Why Does Venus Have No Moon? Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) – and moved to its current orbit (227.9 million km) – BUT- Mars had moved by a force – and then Mars had collided with Venus –and Mars had pushed ALL DEBRIS with it in its Motion Direction because of its strong motion - Venus had found no debris around and for that Venus couldn't create its moon –But – The Earth mass is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum for that the Earth could attracted some debris and created its moon-Mars has 2 moons and this fact supports my theory because Mars with small mass could attract two moons because the debris were around it while Venus has greater mass but couldn't create its own moon because the debris are moved with Mars motion- the rest debris are attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt

Shortly

The planet data analysis compares between the theory and the planets data to see if there's harmony between them and if the data logical analysis supports the theory

Third Item - My 5 Equations

My 5 Equations Prove Planets Creation and Motions Data Is Defined By Geometrical Rules (NO Random Creation)-I provide here the three main equations (1st, 4th and 5th) let's refer to them in following

Planet orbital distance equation (My 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do)

where d= planet orbital distance and do= its previous neighbor orbital distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

The equation depends on the planets order, just 2 neighbor planets can be used

The equation exceptions are, Earth depends on Mercury Not Venus – and Mars depends on Venus Not Earth And Pluto depends on Uranus Not Neptune

The Equation Concept Support

let's suppose–There's a right triangle by the 3 points The Sun, Mercury and Venus)- by that - Venus angle is (61 degrees) because Venus orbital distance (108.2 mkm) x cos (61) = Venus Mercury distance (50.3 mkm) – and

Earth angle is (51 degrees) because Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) x cos (51) = Earth Mercury distance (91.7 mkm) – and

Mars angle is (41.7 degrees) because Mars orbital distance (227.9mkm) x cos (41.7)= Mars Mercury distance (170 mkm)- and

Jupiter angle is (22.2 degrees) because Jupiter orbital distance (778.6 mkm) x cos (22.2)= Jupiter Mercury distance (721 mkm)

Similar to that – Saturn angle is 16.5, Uranus angle is 11.6 deg, Neptune angle is 9.2 deg and Pluto angle is 8 deg- these angles follow the same system

for example -Pluto angle is (8 degrees) because Pluto orbital distance (5906 mkm) x cos (8)= Pluto Mercury distance (5848 mkm) –

NOTICE No. (1)

The right angle and its triangle is (a hypothesis) – but we can prove it's a fact because (v1/v2) = (θ1/ θ2) -means – these angles are rated with their planets velocities – for example (Neptune velocity 5.4/ Pluto velocity 4.7) = (9.2 deg /8 deg)

NOTICE No. (2) these angles are complementary one another for that

940 = 61 x 2 x 8 = 51 x 2 x 9.2 = 41.7 x 22.2

(61 degrees) is Venus angle and (51 degrees) is The Earth angle and (41.7 degrees) is Mars angle and (8 degrees) is Pluto angle and (9.2 degrees) is Neptune angle and (22.2 degrees) is Jupiter angle

DISCUSSION

The equation and angles system data prove the following

(1)

The planets orbital distances are defined based on their neighbors and NO mass is required to define it- Newton is wrong- planet orbital distance is Not defined based on this planet mass (also planet motion doesn't depend on its mass)

Shortly- the mass is not related for the orbital distance definition at all

(2) The gravitation equation is wrong because it contradicts the planets order- for example (Mercury- Venus – the Earth) this order tells more mass needs longer orbital distance while the gravitation equation tells more mass needs shorter distance- clearly the equation contradicts the planets order- also Jupiter the greatest mass is not the more near planet to the sun – when we asked the physicist he told this is happened because of the planets initial conditions- my equation proves no initial conditions have effects on any distance – all distances are defined by the same one rule and the angles system supports the equation concept proves that (the planets orbital distances are defined based on each other and no mass is required in this definition)

Planet Diameter Equation (My 4th equation)

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

All planets diameters follow this equation perfectly

Notice

This equation is discussed with matter creation and definition (item no. I) also the equation is analyzed and discussed with all details in the paper discussions

Planet velocity equation (My 5th equation)

Planet velocity definition is important point of study because many planet data is defined based on its velocity- specifically

Planet diameter is defined based on the rate (v1/v2) by my planet diameter equation –discussed before – and

Planet orbital distance is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^2 –and

Planet orbital period is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^3

Please note – Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and it's fact proved by the planets data – but Newton stated Planet motion depends on its mass- this is NOT Fact and Planet velocity is defined without any effect of its mass as the data shows

(I have refuted Newton theory of the sun gravity and his theory for mass gravity)

Now – let's ask - How Is Planet Velocity Defined?

Planet velocity is defined by Five Rules let's see them in following

(i) First Rule

v1v2 = constant= 322 (my 5th equation)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Mercury velocity) =322

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 =322

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 =322

24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) =322 (Max error 2%)

The rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are defined in pairs and not individually, each planet velocity has its own complementary- the rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- the reflection of energy and data is discussed later.

In this rule we interest for the constant (322)- let's ask- why the constant = 322?

The constant 322 depends on the speed 1.16 million km per second because

(1160000 seconds = 322 hours) - Means

Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km and

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance = 1.16 million km

Shortly -we realize that the constant 322 is produced based on the speed 1.16 million km per second- means- the planets velocities are complementary each other because they are defined as functions in this same speed 1.16 million km per second

(This is similar to electron and positron are produced from Gamma ray, The two particles depend on Gamma energy in their masses)

Based On This Data

I concluded there's a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second and from this light beam energy the solar system is created- and the planets velocities are defined as functions in this speed 1.16 million km per second and that causes the velocities to be complementary each other-

(Note the speed 1.16 million km per second is proved strongly in my paper)

(ii) Second Rule

v1v2 = 1

The velocity here uses the solar day (86400 seconds) – let's prove that-

Mercury moves per solar day = 4.095 million km

Venus moves per solar day = 3.024 million km

The Earth moves per solar day = 2.574 million km

The Moon moves per solar day = 2.4 million km

Mars moves per solar day = 2.082 million km

Jupiter moves per solar day = 1.1318 million km

Saturn moves per solar day = 0.838 million km

Uranus moves per solar day = 0.5875 million km

Neptune moves per solar day = 0.4665 million km

Pluto moves per solar day = 0.406 million km

AND

0.406 (Pluto velocity) x 2.4 (the moon velocity) = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.4665 (Neptune velocity) x 2.082 (Mars velocity) = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.5875 (Uranus velocity) x 3.024 (Venus velocity)/1.772 = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.838 (Saturn velocity) x 1.1318 (Jupiter velocity) = 1 (error 5%)

(1.772 = π^1/2)

The second rule tells very similar meaning (v1v2= constant= 1)

The data uses the velocities per solar day for that the constant is changed from 322 into 1 but the rule is the same- (v1v2= Constant)

I want to say- the rule (v1v2 = Constant) tells that (The Velocities Are Reflected On Each Other) this conclusion is simple one (A x 1/A= constant=1)

The rule proves the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection has effect on the planets data and for that the planets velocities are defined by this energy reflection and the velocities are produced complementary each other as a result.

Notice the second rule causes confusion because the complementary player is changed- for example Pluto is complementary with Venus (in the first rule 35 x 4.7 x 2 = 322) but Pluto is complementary with the Earth moon in the second rule (0.406 x 2.4 = 1) that tells the players are changed which is illogical idea- how can we solve this problem? The third rule solves it – let's see this rule in following

(iii) Third Rule

v1/v2 = 0.8 (based on the planets order)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 (35 km/s = Venus velocity error 7.25%)

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 (The moon velocity)

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 (Mars velocity) (error 1%)

24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 0.8 = 2 x 9.7 (Saturn velocity)

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8 = 2 x 5.4 (Neptune velocity) (error 3%)

6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 0.8 = 5.4 (Neptune velocity)

5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8 = 4.3 (Pluto velocity 4.7 the error 7.25%)

Please note

The error 7.25 is found by the rate 1.0725 – that means

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 = 1.0725 x 35 km/s (Venus velocity)

5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8 = 4.3= 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) / 1.0725

29.8 km/s (Earth velocity) = 27.78 km/s (The moon velocity) x 1.0725

We know the rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length contraction effect- and we know this rate has effect on around 40% of all planets data – that's why we see this rate has effect on the planets velocities definition-

Let's remember the question-

In the rule (v1v2=322) we found that Pluto is complementary with Venus because

4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 2 = 322

But in the rule (v1v2 =1) we found Pluto is complementary with the moon because

0.406 mkm (Pluto Velocity Daily) x 2.4 mkm (The Moon Velocity Daily) = 1

The question asked – if the planets velocities are defined in pairs complementary each other and not individually how can the players be changed?

The answer tells – the planets velocities are rated by (0.8) based on the planets order means – the moon velocity daily 2.4 mkm = Venus velocity daily 3.024 mkm x 0.8

The rate (0.8) defines all planets velocities depend on each other by order-

Now let's see Planet velocity final definition– because- the definition uses three planets velocities together and not only two – let's put that clearly in following-

(iv) The Planet Velocity Final Definition

(A)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 km/s (Venus velocity 35 km/s)

Venus moves per solar day 3.024 million km -But

1/3.024 = 0.3307 million km = Uranus moves per solar day 0.5875 million km /1.77

(note 1.77 = π^1/2) and (38 = 35 x 1.0725)

For that

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 322

(B)

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 km/s (The Moon velocity)

The moon moves per solar day 2.4 million km -But

1/2.4 = 0.406 million km = Pluto moves per solar day 0.406 million km

For that

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 = 322

(C)

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)

Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km -But

1/2.082 = 0.4665 million km = Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km

For that

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 = 322

(D)

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8= 2 x 5.24km/s (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s error 3%)

Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km - But

1/0.4665 = 2.082 million km = Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km

For that

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) = 322 (CONT)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

[email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

3 notes · View notes

michaelrotonal · 3 months ago

Text

i can feel the personalities of numbers

i'll randomly generate some numbers from 1 to 100

23 - prime boi. not even tryin to hide it.

28 - how dare you be divisible by both 4 and 7. it just doesn't feel right

13 - definitely prime. sorta reminds me of 91. we'll get to that later

5 - 5 is just 5. too small to actually feel like a prime

21 - blackjack boi. divisible by 7

77 - why doesn't he feel divisible by 7

85 - haha eighty and five? you just can't make this up. doesn't look divisible by any number other than five

67 - this prime keeps visiting me when i play DIVE. can it stop

51 - composite wearing a paper-thin prime mask. like bro i can see that you're divisible by 3

27 - cube bois unite

70 - weird

27 - again? wh- i just did this one

77 - definitely divisible by 11. sorta feels divisible by 7

16 - is that 16 from hit game 2048?

98 - bro is two times seven squared. just needs two more.

77 - this is the third time i've gotten 77

90 - divisible by so many things

69 - nice. clearly divisible by 3 though

99 - clearly 9 times 11

19 - prime sandwiched between very composite numbers (18 and 20)

91 - composite wearing a cardboard-thin prime mask. only way you can tell he isn't prime is noticing that 91 = 100-9 = 10^2-3^2 = (10-3)(10+3) = 7*13

88 - hmm, eh, no? you can't do that

75 - a real threeven over here. with its five's divisibility it can go anywhere

24 - feels so good. so many factors

56 - 7 by 8. how could anyone ever confuse him with 54

69 - nice 2

99 - friends with %. try to keep him away

48 - woah that's a lot of factors. that's like. ten factors

20 - very practical.

46 - bro is clearly just double a prime

56 - hey wait you're the number of partitions of 11

24 - pretty factorizable. sure do love having factors.

34 - clearly double 17

78 - i can feel the 13-ness and the evenness but not really the 3-ness but definitely the 6-ness

25 - 24's neighbor. nice big square

93 - 3 times 31, not even trying to hide it

10 - why does he get to have the 0 symbol. he isn't divisible like 0 is

98 - i already did this one

36 - definitely triangular. definitely square. definitely not triangular and square

44 - ooh an elevener. haven't had one of those in a while

42 - 8 factors, but just took the idea from 30. literally just 2 by 3 by 7 instead of 2 by 3 by 5

29 - nice prime

89 - nice big prime

26 - feels definitely 13-y

28 - supposedly perfect. how can you be perfect when you're a multiple of 7. you gotta be smooth

50 - smoother than 28. 5-smooth rather than 7-smooth

8 - twocubed is 8 and has 8 letters. that's all i can really think of 8 as

8 - got the 2-ness and the 4-ness with a hint of 3

65 - fibonacci product (5 by 13), next-door neighbor to 64 (8 by 8)

33 - no. you can't do that. one more than 32? you can't take a power of two and add just one to it

41 - prime made of two squares. what is he hiding

71 - one-upping 70, isn't even weird

30 - the true classic 8-factor. 8 being 2 by 2 by 2, the 2 choices each for picking to include 2, 3, or 5

62 - just needs 2 more. definitely divisible by 31

50 - woa-oah. we're half way theere. woa-oah. one more than a square.

10 - too low to really feel like anything

8 - lives a double life as both a power of 2 and a fibonacci number

49 - 7 by 7. do not ever call him "one too few"

30 - 2 by 3 by 5. nice primorial

62 - okay this is enough repetition. i'm expanding the range to 1 to 150

140 - he should not be divisible by 4. he's 14 by 10 and those are both double prime, neither are divisible by 4

143 - nice little big prime collab between 11 and 13. good job

127 - mersenne prime. right after a super big prime gap, hits you like 2 bricks

114 - hmmm, no. you can't be even and then do this. what are you even double of anyway- double 57? you're divisible by 19? unbelievable

115 - now this is what i'm talking about. divisible by only 5 unless you divide it by 5

43 - also doesn't feel prime? like

110 - slips past the cracks. hides as 77 + 33. got 100 arrested using that strategy

72 - that is the second number with 12 factors (first being 60), and it definitely feels factory

61 - the whiplash of going from 12 factors to 2 is just too much

13 - itty bitty prime

101 - big boy prime. does not like the connotation that things like "physics 101" gives it

110 - gets overshadowed by 100.

101 - okay this has got to be a prank. who switch my rng with a binary rng

5 - mission impossible time signature. dun dun dn dn

68 - ough so close. definitely divisible by 4 but not by anything else

93 - hang on i already did this one

74 - 2 by 37? definitely feels like a double prime.

30 - okay i've gotten this number enough times.

83 - he is prime. he does not belong with cat face emoticons like uwu and owo

50 - yeah that's enough. this is my last number

#math #mathblr #mathematics

15 notes · View notes

worlds-smallest-epsilon · 11 months ago

Note

Number ask game! 37, which for some reason is my favorite number. Also, 127 already got asked so I'll go in a similar vein with 2147483647 :))

37 is prime which is fun. It's one more than a square which is neat. Interestingly, $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{37})$ has class number 1, meaning its ring of integers has unique factorization. A-

2147483647 is another Mersenne prime, and it's the largest value you can represent with a 32-bit signed integer. That's interesting enough to save it from a D. C-

#asks #math #number ratings

6 notes · View notes

unnatural-transformations · 5 months ago

Text

My Favorite Mathematical Proofs [1 of n]

This is the first in another irregular series of posts I'm hoping to start. In these posts I'll talk about proofs that I find particularly clever or surprising or elegant or funny. To start the series off I'm going to talk about one of my favorite ever short proofs, by Don Zagier, of an old number theory result originally due to Fermat.

This is sometimes known as Fermat's Christmas Theorem, because Fermat wrote about it in a letter to Marin Mersenne on December 25th 1640 (as usual for Fermat, I don't believe he actually gave a proof). The theorem has since been proved by a lot of famous mathematicians including Euler, Lagrange and Dedekind. Zagier gave his proof [inspired by Lagrange's] as a "one sentence proof" (which it is ... technically?) in The American Mathematical Monthly in 1990. You can read it here, if you like. It won't take long!

What I like about this proof is how little number theory it seems to involve. The key is a (fairly intuitive) lemma about involutions on finite sets, which Zagier uses without proof. Recall that an involution is a bijection which is equal to its own inverse: applying the bijection twice to any element brings you back to your original element. The intermediate step might send your element to something new, or it might not: in the latter case we call the element a fixed point of the involution. The lemma tells us that if we know that any given involution on a finite set has exactly one fixed point, then every involution on the set must have at least one fixed point.

Zagier considers the set of positive-integer solutions to the equation x^2 + 4yz = p and defines two involutions on it. One of these involutions (interchanging y and z) looks very natural, and it is clear that any fixed point of this involution will give a way of wrting p as a sum of two squares. The other involution is much more complicated in appearance -- it isn't even clear that it's an involution at all at first -- but it can be shown after some calculation to have exactly one fixed point. By the lemma, then, the first involution must also have a fixed point, which proves Fermat's theorem.

I think I like this proof because it has something of the air of a magic trick to it. It's not at all clear where the second, more complicated involution comes from. We barely seem to use the fact that p is a prime of the form 4k+1 at all. And the proof is totally non-constructive: it doesn't give you even a hint of how to go about actually finding pairs of squares that sum to p.

Maybe to some people this would all be an argument against the merits of this proof, but ... well, I dunno. I just really like it.

If you're interested in the full gory details (and the "one sentence" version linked to is a bit too terse for you), I've writen out a much longer version below the cut which does all the required calculations and checks all the details in full.

[These are given as screenshots of LaTeX output, so I'm afraid they're unreadable on a screenreader. Please let me know if you'd like the raw LaTeX.]

Now finally we have:

#math #my favorite proofs

0 notes

afactaday · 1 year ago

Text

#aFactADay2023

#777!!! we made it!! whooo!!! in celebration of seven hundred and seventy-seven facts, here's a fact all about seven! seven is not only a Mersenne Prime (a prime of the form 2^p-1 where p is a prime), but it's the first Double Mersenne Prime (because the exponent p is itself a Mersenne prime formed from 2^2-1). only four double Mersenne primes are known, and the next likely contender is about 10^{10^19}, which is far too large to check. seven is also the first Newman-Shanks-Williams Prime, which has some complicated definition involving square roots. this definition arose from simple group theory and is really intriguing but i'm afraid that can't tell you any more because the only reference i can find (the original paper) seems to have been deleted.

Lucky Numbers, completely unrelated to Euler's Lucky Numbers, are the numbers which remain after a sieving algorithm is applied (find it on the wiki). seven is the second Lucky Prime: a prime lucky number.

seven is also the first Woodall prime, a prime of the form n*2^n-1 (n=2, so it's the second Woodall number). it's also a factorial prime (a prime which is a factorial number plusorminus one), a Safe Prime (a number which is twice plus one a prime; look up Sophie Germain primes), a Happy Prime (a prime which is a happy number, which can be found by an iterative algorithm on its digits), and a Leyland Prime of the Second Kind (a prime of the form x^y-y^x). and just to make this slightly less primey, the regular heptagon is the first regular polygon which can't be constructed with a straight edge and compasses.

link: seven!!! (7-a-side sport innit)

ahh 777, it feels so satisfying

#afactaday #aFactADay2023 #fact of the day #fotd777 #this post was auto-posted by flanbot

0 notes

allofmymaths · 4 years ago

Text

BMO1 2021 Question 6

This is another question from the 2021 BMO1 paper which is pretty neat.

Start with we know that n = 2^a + 2^b for some distinct integers a and b

Also, we know that n = 2^p - 1 + 2^q - 1 = 2^p + 2^q - 2 for some p and q such that 2^p - 1 and 2^q - 1 are primes

First, without loss of generality we can assume that a < b and p < q

For now let’s just focus on the Mersenne Prime, 2^p - 1

Notice that if you can write p = rs for some integers r and s, then without loss of generality if we assume that r > 1 and let x = 2^s then:

If r is even we can write 2^p - 1 = x^r - 1 = (x^(r/2) + 1)(x^(r/2) - 1)

If r is odd, we can write 2^p - 1 = x^r - 1 = (x - 1)(x^(r-1) + x^(r2) + ... + 1)

In both cases this violates the primality of 2^p - 1 whenever r < p or s > 1, and therefore we know that we must have r = p and s = 1. This is telling us that p is a prime number.

Now we may go back to 2^p + 2^q - 2 = n = 2^a + 2^b

If we consider both of these expression in binary:

- 2^a + 2^b can be written as (10)^a + (10)^b in binary, which tells us that the number has a 1 in the (a+1)th and (b+1)th digits and zeroes everywhere else. In particular, this tells us there are EXACTLY two 1 digits since a =/= b.

- 2^p + 2^q - 2 can be written as (10)^p + (10)^q - 10. When subtracting the 10, starting from the 2nd digit, any zeroes become a one until you reach the first 1. Because you know that p < q this means that you’ll always hit the 1 in the (p+1)th place before the 1 in the (q+1)th place. This is important because this tells us that q = b.

Additionally, since we know that q = b, we know that 2^p - 2 = 2^a and this can only be true if p = 2, a = 1. This is because the left hand side is divisible by 2 but not 4, so a = 1. If a = 1 then p could only be 2.

Now finally we have: n = 2^q - 2 + 2^2 = 2^q + 2

= 2^(q-1) + 1 + 2^(q-1) + 1

Notice that q-1 is even since q > 2 is prime and therefore odd. Let q-1 = 2k for some integer k. The we may write

n = [2^(2k) + 2*2^(k) + 1] + [2^(2k) - 2*2^(k) + 1]

-> n = (2^k + 1)^2 + (2^k - 1)^2

I liked using binary digits to deduce information about a, b, p and q. Ultimately it’s the same as considering various conditions of divisibility, but it was a nice visual aid.

The last step of adding in the terms 2*2^k - 2*2^k to get two squares was quite fun as well.

#maths #olympiad #math olympiad #math

4 notes · View notes

scifigeneration · 7 years ago

Text

Largest known prime number discovered: Why it matters

by Anthony Bonato

In the movie Contact, based on the novel of the same name by Carl Sagan, Dr. Ellie Arroway searches for intelligent extraterrestrial life by scanning the sky with radio telescopes. When Arroway, played by Jodie Foster, recognizes prime numbers in an interplanetary signal, she believes it’s proof that an alien intelligence has sent the human race a message.

A number is considered prime if it is only divisible by one and itself. For example, two, three, five and seven are prime. The number 15, which is three times five, is not prime. It’s no coincidence that Arroway believes the aliens in Contact use prime numbers as a cosmic “hello” — they are building blocks of other numbers. Every number is a product of primes.

In December 2017, the largest known prime number was discovered using a computer search. The prime was discovered by Jonathan Pace, an electrical engineer who currently works at FedEx. Why is this important? Because without prime numbers your banking information, Paypal transactions or Amazon purchases could be compromised.

Large primes, like the one just discovered, play a critical role in cyber-security. Cryptography is the science of encoding and decoding information, and many of its algorithms, such as RSA, rely heavily on prime numbers.

Bitcoin and other crypto-currencies use security that depends on prime numbers. (Shutterstock)

Mersenne primes

While there are infinitely many primes, there is no known formula to generate them all. A race is ongoing to find larger primes using a mixture of math techniques and computation.

One way to get large primes uses a mathematical concept discovered by the 17th-century French monk and scholar, Marin Mersenne.

Marin Mersenne. H Loeffel, Blaise Pascal, Basel: Birkhäuser 1987, CC BY-NC

A Mersenne prime is one of the form 2ⁿ - 1, where n is a positive integer. The first four of these are three, seven, 31 and 127.

Not every number of the form 2ⁿ - 1 is prime, however; for example, 2⁴ - 1 = 15. If 2ⁿ - 1 is prime, then it can be shown that n itself must be prime. But even if n is prime, there is no guarantee the number 2ⁿ - 1 is prime: 2¹¹ - 1 = 2,047, which is not prime becauase it equals 23 times 89.

There are only 50 known Mersenne primes. An unresolved conjecture is that there is an infinite number of them.

The search for new primes

The Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (or GIMPS) is a collaborative effort of many individuals and teams from around the globe to find new Mersenne primes. George Woltman began GIMPS in 1996, and in 2018 it includes more than 183,000 volunteer users contributing the collective power of over 1.6 million CPUs.

The most recently discovered Mersenne prime is succinctly written as 2⁷⁷²³²⁹¹⁷ - 1; that’s two multiplied by itself 77,232,917 times, minus one. Jonathan Pace’s discovery took six days of computation on a quad-core Intel i5-6600 CPU, and was independently verified by four other groups.

The newly discovered prime has a whopping 23,249,425 digits. To get a sense of how large that is, suppose we filled up a book with digits, each digit counted as a word and each book having 100,000 words. Then the digits of 2⁷⁷²³²⁹¹⁷ - 1 would fill up about 232 books!

How does GIMPS find primes?

GIMPS uses the Lucas-Lehmer test for primes. For this, form a sequence of integers starting with four, and whose terms are the previous term squared and minus two. The test says that the number 2ⁿ - 1 is prime if it divides the (n-2)th term in the sequence.

While the Lucas-Lehmer test looks easy enough to check, the computational bottleneck in applying it comes from squaring numbers. Multiplication of integers is something every school-aged kid can do, but for large numbers, it poses problems, even for computers. One way around this is to use Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT), algorithms that speed up computations.

Anyone can get involved with GIMPS — as long as you have a decent computer with an internet connection. Free software to search for Mersenne primes can be found on the GIMPS website.

While the largest known prime is stunningly massive, there are infinitely many more primes beyond it waiting to be discovered. Like Ellie Arroway did in Contact, we only have to look for them.

Anthony Bonato is Professor of Mathematics at Ryerson University.

This article was originally published on The Conversation.

#math #science #space exploration #the search for extraterrestrial life #prime numbers

49 notes · View notes

quadrantmathematics · 4 years ago

Text

Quadrant Mathematics Book

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_function

Polynomials can be solved by radicals only up to degree four. It took a very long time to discover the proof for degree four. The fourth is always different. It took until 1824 to discover the proof.

The first four Mersenne primes were known by the ancients. The fourth is different. It took until modern times to discover the fifth. The fourth is always different. The fifth is ultra transcendent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mersenne_prime

127

8191 was discovered in 1461

The FOIL method is used for multiplying binomials in math. The four terms for the FOIL method are

First ("first" terms of each binomial are multiplied together)

Inner ("inside" terms are multiplied—second term of the first binomial and first term of the second)

Outer ("outside" terms are multiplied—that is, the first term of the first binomial and the second term of the second)

Last ("last" terms of each binomial are multiplied)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0_qX4VJhMQ

The geometric proof for derivatives in calculus involves four squares in quadrant formation. I learned this proof while watching a teaching company course on Calculus.

https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/completing-square.html

The geometric analysis for completing the square involves four squares. Completing the square is essential in algebra. The geometric proof for derivatives in calculus also involves four squares.

There are 16 squares in the quadrant model. There are 16 possible Truth Functions of two binaries

Here is an example of a truth table with the four possibilities

The ancient Greeks knew about the first four perfect numbers. The fourth one is different, and it took a lot longer for the ancient Greeks to discover the fourth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number

for p = 2: 21(22 − 1) = 6

for p = 5: 24(25 − 1) = 496

for p = 3: 22(23 − 1) = 28

for p = 7: 26(27 − 1) = 8128.

Euclid’s Elements was the most popular book behind the Bible. Euclid’s Elements had five postulates. The five postulates are the most famous set of postulates in math history. The fifth postulate was proven to be false. The fifth is always questionable. However, the discovery that the fifth postulate was false lead to the uncovering of different geometries. Ancients saw the fourth postulate as different. Proclus did not think that the fourth postulate should be a postulate. The fourth is always different. Euclid also proposed five axioms. The fifth axiom is false and the fourth is different. Some suggest that Euclid intentionally made the fifth postulate false so that out of its discovery as false, new geometries would be discovered. I learned about Euclid’s postulates on a teaching company course on mathematics, and the professor described how the fifth was incorrect and the fourth was different.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/roots-of-unity/whate28099s-the-deal-with-euclide28099s-fourth-postulate/

"To draw a straight line from any point to any point."

"To describe a circle with any centre and distance [radius]."

The third is about circles. A circle has the look of being an object and being whole. The first postulate is about a line. A line is like air, taking up no area. Air is the first square element. The second postulate is a straight line that is extended. The second element is water. Still there is no area being taken up, but it is longer. The first two are a duality. The third, the circle, brings area into the equation. The third square is the most solid. The fourth postulate is on right angles. Right angles are quadrants. The fourth is always transcendent

"To produce [extend] a finite straight line continuously in a straight line."

"That all right angles are equal to one another."

Semiotic squares take the form of a quadrant and are very popular. Semiotic squares are used a lot in academia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semiotic_square

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/03/numbers-guy

Deheane describes how in cultures throughout the world the first three numbers were usually represented similarly, but the fourth differently. For instance Roman numerals has I II and III, but IV is written with a V, different from the first three. There are some cultures that represent the first four numbers similarly. But all cultures represent five differently.

Deheane also points out that when tracking objects, only four can be tracked at one time. With three objects it is difficult, but four very difficult, but five at one time is impossible.

The quadrant model has 16 squares. Also scientists pointed out that a person can only imagine 16 squares at one time.

https://books.google.com/books?id=1p6XWYuwpjUC&pg=PT83&lpg=PT83&dq=Stanislas+Dehaene+one+two+three+four+chinese&source=bl&ots=S6NCR0YXvL&sig=01bEkiLf6Hoj44PrRG4mPsc8C6A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjsrfre0N3XAhUY6GMKHeClDXs4ChDoAQgxMAE#v=onepage&q=Stanislas%20Dehaene%20one%20two%20three%20four%20chinese&f=false

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subitizing

People can make flash judgements on the number of objects from one to three well. At four it becomes difficult, and at five the accuracy makes an exponential decline. The fourth is always different. The fifth is ultra transcendent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_number_system

The approximate number system is four numbers greater than four. Numbers one through four are counted through parallel individuation.

There are four fundamental operations in math. The four operations are

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_(mathematics)

+, plus (addition)

÷, obelus (division)

−, minus (subtraction)

×, times (multiplication)

Quartiles are very important in statistics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartile

Quartiles are three points that divide a graph into four equal groups.

Boxplot (with quartiles and an interquartile range) and a probability density function (pdf) of a normal N(0,1σ2) population

Boxplots are also very important in statistics. I learned about boxplots in middle school and in my college statistics course. I also learned about quartiles and interquartile range in middle school and in college. A box plot graphically depicts numerical data through its quartiles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_plot. The bottom and top of the box are the first and third quartiles. The inside of the box is the second quartile.

Figure 1. Box plot of data from the Michelson–Morley experiment

Boxplot (with an interquartile range) and a probability density function (pdf) of a Normal N(0,σ2) Population

https://en.bywiki.com/wiki/Lagrange%27s_four-square_theorem#Historical_development

There is a four square theorem in mathematics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfister%27s_sixteen-square_identity

There is a sixteen square identity in mathematics. There are sixteen squares in the quadrant model

Jade Mirror of the Four Unknowns solved equations for up to four unknowns. The book also had equations of three unknowns. In the book we thus see the three, four dynamic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuan_dynasty

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jade_Mirror_of_the_Four_Unknowns

The first four problems illustrate the method of the four unknowns. The four unknowns are

Heaven

Man

Earth

Matter

Jade mirror of the four unknowns consists of four books.

The introduction shows The Square of the Sum of the Four Quantities of a Right Angle Triangle

The illustration is a sixteen square quadrant model. The first illustration of the book is a sixteen square quadrant model

The book ends with the equation of the four unknowns

The famous Rhind Mathematical papyrus has four sections

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhind_Mathematical_Papyrus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lo_Shu_Square

The Lho Shu Magic Square contains a cross of odd numbers. The magic square is used to structure Jain Temples. It is seen as very sacred

There is a cross/quadrant pattern within the Sator Square. A cross/quadrant is depicted with the word Tenet. The sator square is a “four time palindrome”. People have claimed that it has magical properties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sator_Square

By repositioning the letters around the central letter Ν (en), a Greek cross can be made that reads Pater Noster (Latin for "Our Father", the first two words of the "Lord's Prayer") both vertically and horizontally. The remaining letters – two each of A and O – can be taken to represent the concept of Alpha and Omega, a reference in Christianity to the omnipresence of God. Thus the square might have been used as a covert symbol for early Christians to express their presence to each other

In Plato’s Meno, Plato tries to prove that knowledge is innate and comes from the World of the Forms. Socrates claims that people come from the World of the Forms before they are born, and that whenever somebody learns something, he is merely recalling what he already knows from the World of the Forms. Socrates proves that knowledge is innate by showing that a slave boy knows geometry. According to Socrates, the slave boy has received no education, since he is a slave. But because the slave boy understands the geometry, Socrates claims, the slave boy must have already known it from the World of the Forms

Socrates draws diagrams in the sand. The diagrams that Socrates draws to prove the world of the Forms are what I call the Form of the Good, the Form of Existence. Socrates draws the quadrant model 16 squares. I watched a teaching company course where the Professor drew the diagrams that Socrates drew in the sand.

https://tothereal.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/are-we-slaves-to-socrates/

Here are the diagrams that Socrates draws

In Roman numerals X is the number 10. Philosophers connect the number 10 and the tetractys. I have seen Jungian philosophers propose that because the x is fourfold, and the tetractys is related to four, the reason why the Romans used X as 10 is because of the tetractys.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Garden_of_Cyrus

The Garden of Cyrus is a book by Sir Thomas Browne. Browne sees the quincunx in so many places in reality that he says that it is evidence of intelligent design. Thomas Browne relates the quincunx to the Garden of Cyrus. The Garden of Cyrus took a quincunx pattern.

Frontispiece to 'The Garden of Cyrus' (1658)

In high school trigonometry my class learned the unit circle. The unit circle is a quadrant

http://locusacademy.org/unit-circles-and-trigonometric-equations/

An acronym that my class used to remember the four quadrants of the unit circle was All Stations to Central

http://locusacademy.org/unit-circles-and-trigonometric-equations/

In the upper left quadrant, only the sin values are positive, while the others are negative

The upper right quadrant's values of sin, cos and tan are all positive.

In the lower left quadrant, the tan values are positive, while the others are negative

The fourth quadrant is where the cos values are positive while the others are negative.

There is a famous puzzle called the Nine Dots Puzzle. My Grandpa showed me the puzzle. Also in my psychology class at UCSD the Professor showed us the puzzle. You are told to draw four lines that connect nine dots. The nine dots are in three columns. The way to solve the solution is to go outside of the limits of the nine dots. If you do so, you go into the region of a 16 square quadrant model. Moveroever, at the center of the solution is an X. An X is a quadrant. The solution employs what psychologists call “lateral thinking”. In order to solve the problem you must think outside of the box.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_outside_the_box

The Wason Selection task is also known as the “four card problem”. Developed by Peter Cathcart Wason, the four card problem is one of the most famous tasks in the study of deductive reasoning. I remember learning about the four card problem in a psychology class I took at UCSD.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wason_selection_task

The Cartesian coordinate system is used extensively in mathematics. The Cartesian coordinate system is made up of four quadrants

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_coordinate_system

The complex number plane is similar to the Cartesian coordinate system, but it uses the imaginary number i on the y axis. The complex number plane is called an argand diagram, and it has four quadrants. Pauli saw the use of imaginary numbers and complex number planes in quantum mechanics as further evidence that physics was based around the quatenary.

http://www.peterstone.name/Maplepgs/complex.html

The Missing Squares Puzzle is a famous puzzle in mathematics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_hammers

Pythagoras used four hammers to discover the foundations of musical tuning. The four hammers are known as the Pythagorean hammers. He came across five men hammering with hammers, and four of them were harmonious, but the fifth was not. Again, the fourth is always transcendent, and the fifth is always questionable.

https://www.amazon.com/Fifth-Hammer-Pythagoras-Disharmony-World/dp/193540816X

https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/fifth-hammer

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anscombe%27s_quartet

Ascombe’s quartet is four datasets that have very similar descriptive statistics, but seem very different when graphed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP_problem

NP Hard is different from the other three, P, NP, and NP complete. P v NP is a major unsolved problem in computer science

NP-Complete

NP hard

In a math class that I sat in on at UCSD, the Professor drew the bijection, injection, surjection quadrant on the board. The fourth quadrant is different from the other three. The fourth quadrant does not even have a name

I sat in on a math class as well at UCSD where the four types of Fourier Transforms were brought up. The four types fit a quadrant pattern. Fourier transforms were talked about a lot in different classes that I studied. The four types fit a quadrant pattern.

https://dsp.stackexchange.com/questions/28020/formulas-of-the-fourier-transform-family

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_function

A quartic function is the highest degree such that every polynomial can be solved by radicals. Quartic means four

Graph of a polynomial of degree 4, with 3 critical points and four real roots(crossings of the x axis) (and thus no complex roots).

Ferrari discovered the quartic solution in 1540. The proof that the quartic is the highest degree polynomial that could be solved by radicals was given by the Abel- Ruffini theorem in 1824.

In order to complete the proof on the quadrature of the parabola, Archimedes must prove that

His proof involves a diagram that resembles a quadrant model

Archimedes' proof that 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + ... = 1/3

The Missing Square Puzzle is a famous puzzle in mathematics. It invovles four colors

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_square_puzzle

Kryptos is a sculpture by the American artist Jim Sanborn at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in Langley, Virginia.

It has four encrypted messages. Three of the four messages have been encoded. The fourth is different and transcendent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kryptos

Pyramids in Egypt are quadrants, and the pyramids of Giza reflect the pythagorean theorem.

http://africancreationenergy.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-ptah-horus-pythagoras-theorem.html

Each side of the Pythagorean theorem represented for the Egyptians a different God. The four by four square is the quadrant model square. The four by four 16 square of the simplest pythagorean triple, the three four five triangle, is represented by Isis

http://africancreationenergy.blogspot.com/search/label/African%20Mathematics

The proof of the Pythagorean theorem attributed to pythagoras involved four squares. Look at the diagram to the right above, and notice the four segments.

http://theopenscroll.blogspot.com/2013/06/part-3-signs-of-horus-worship-345-on-map.html

64 is four quadrant models. 16 is the quadrant model. The eye of Osiris has the ratios of the quadrant model

The right side of the eye = 1⁄2

The pupil = 1⁄4

The eyebrow = 1⁄8

The left side of the eye = 1⁄16

The curved tail = 1⁄32

The teardrop = 1⁄64

The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus contains tables of "Horus Eye Fractions".[16]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_Horus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_square_puzzle

The missing squares puzzle is a famous mathematical optical illusion. The demonstration involves four figures of four colors.

Sam Lloyd’s paradoxical dissection also has four shapes and colors.

Sam Loyd's paradoxical dissection

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_square_puzzle

Mitsunobu Matsuyama's "Paradox" uses four congruent quadrilaterals and a small square, which form a larger square. The diagram makes a quadrant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_square_puzzle

The 15 puzzle involves 16 squares. The 15 puzzle is a four by four quadrant model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15_puzzle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_puzzle

Four fours is another mathematical puzzle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_fours

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Hanoi

The three peg tower of Hanoi puzzle has a simple recursive solution. The optimal solution for a four peg tower of hanoi puzzle was not discovered until 2014. For the case of more than four pegs the problem is an open problem. The fourth is always transcendent and the fifth is questionable.

The famous T puzzle consists of four polygonal shapes. The puzzle seems easy but it is not “because of the irregular piece”. The fourth piece is different than the previous three. Again we see the three plus one pattern. Few people are able to solve the T puzzle in under five minutes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_puzzle

The latin cross puzzle uses a cross. A cross is a quadrant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_puzzle

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2017/cleyhill/comments.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_set

Cantor Dust is made of quadrants

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CantorDust.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menger_sponge

A Jerusalem cube is a fractal object described by Eric Baird in 2011. It is created by recursively drilling Greek cross-shaped holes into a cube.[8][9]The name comes from a face of the cube resembling a Jerusalem cross pattern

http://www.critcrim.org/redfeather/chaos/029management.html

Chaos research, as mentioned, tracks the transformations of dynamical systems from one behavioral regime (attractor state) to another. In such transformations, management science has much to learn and much to ponder. As key parameters of systems reach each one of four feigenbaum numbers (F1-F4 discussed below), the system displays an orderly procession from one dynamical state to another. The procession ceases to be orderly and becomes very chaotic at F4. As a system becomes more chaotic, i.e., it transforms from a simple outcome basin to a much more complex causal field.

Sierpinski triangle in logic: The first 16 conjunctions of lexicographicallyordered arguments. The columns interpreted as binary numbers give 1, 3, 5, 15, 17, 51... (sequence A001317 in the OEIS)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle#Analogues_in_higher_dimensions

The Sierpinski triangle is created by dividing an equilateral triangle into four equal triangles, and continually dividing triangles into four equal triangles.

There is also the Sierpinski tetrahedron. Tetra is four

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierpinski_triangle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kakuro

Kakuro is a logic puzzle that involves quadrants

Sujiko is a logic based problem that involves quadrants

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sujiko

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_puzzle

Ken ken is a logic puzzle that involves quadrants

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KenKen

https://www.target.com/p/otrio-board-game/-/A-52338707?sid=1307S&ref=tgt_adv_XS000000&AFID=google_pla_df&CPNG=PLA_Toys+Shopping_Local&adgroup=SC_Toys&LID=700000001170770pgs&network=g&device=c&location=9031022&gclid=Cj0KCQiA38jRBRCQARIsACEqIese4XJFLR0_GIN7ppWFN4YZ4q2QxHsQD6F4ry5zAbr1NqyoAG95cg4aAruJEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

Wang tiles are quadrants

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wang_tile

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_measurement

I learned the four levels of measurement at UCSD. The first thing that was taught in my statistics class was the four levels of measurement.

Level of measurement or scale of measure is a classification that describes the nature of information within the values assigned to variables.[1] The best known classification of levels of measurement was developed by psychologist Stanley Smith Stevens: nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.

The four levels are

nominal

interval

ordinal

ratio

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/normed+division+algebra

The figure above shows the fibonacci spiral

Approximate and true golden spirals: the green spiral is made from quarter-circles tangent to the interior of each square. The length of the side of a larger square to the next smaller square is in the golden ratio. Quarters are one fourths.

A Fibonacci spiral approximates the golden spiral using quarter-circle arcs inscribed in squares of integer Fibonacci-number side, shown for square sizes 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 and 21.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_spiral

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/normed+division+algebra

Over the real numbers there are only four normed division algebras up to isomorphism: the algebras of

Real numbers

Quaternions

Complex numbers

Octonions

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TetramagicSquare.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multimagic_square

Tetra is four. A tetramagic square is a magic square such that the first, second, third, and fourth powers of the elements all yield magic squares. The tetramagic square is transcendent. The first tetramagic square was discovered in 1983.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_four-square_identity

In mathematics, Euler's four-square identity says that the product of two numbers, each of which is a sum of four squares, is itself a sum of four squares.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfister%27s_sixteen-square_identity

Pfister’s sixteen square identity shows that, in general, the product of two sums of sixteen squares is the sum of sixteen rational squares. This is a popular theorem.

0 notes

destinimott · 5 years ago

Text

Number 8 is the symbol of harmony and balance. Number 8 symbolizes the ability to make decisions. Number 8 symbolizes abundance and power. The Pythagoreans called the number eight “Ogdoad” and considered it the “little holy number”.

The number 8 in the Bible represents a new beginning, meaning a new order or creation, and man's true 'born again' event when he is resurrected from the dead into eternal life.

the number eight there are 88 keys on the piano and the chess board is 8 times 8 squares,

Sixty-four is the square of 8, the cube of 4, and the sixth power of 2. It is the smallest number with exactly seven divisors. It is the lowest positive power of two that is adjacent to neither a Mersenne prime nor a Fermat prime. 64 is the sum of Euler's totient function for the first fourteen integers.

Being the cube of 4, the number 64 represents the physical world of the four elements to the third power, in the plenitude of its expansion

Tessering, a significant part of the fiction of A Wrinkle in Time, is a mode of travel in the fifth dimension that utilizes the shortest route. It can be used in space and in time.

1 note · View note

rbrooksdesign · 3 days ago

Text

"DMT-EDMT Series for December Geometry #20"

acrylic, 25"x40", 2024, Reginald Brooks

20 notes · View notes

itsgerges · 3 months ago

Text

Best Regards

The Planets Were Moving In Their Orbits Before The Sun Creation (Revised) https://app.box.com/s/dufa274dvpay3fqn6syz6sefjljfwnx9 or https://app.box.com/s/89vxxtv3hc8si245fwxpbw0ts9b126nz or https://www.tumblr.com/itsgerges/762780127698567168/the-planets-were-moving-in-their-orbits-before-the?source=share or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/239300.html

The Sun Creation The sun is created depending on the planets motions- because- the sun rays is created by the planets motions energies- In details- Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and from this energy the sun rays is created- means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays but the planets motions energies total is used to produce the sun rays– that explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body (from the planets motions energies total)- This theory is discussed based on 5 hypotheses. The First Hypothesis The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I suppose -the sun rays is produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion- also – I claim No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states. The Second Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The Third Hypothesis The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the wave reflection causes changes for the waves properties and data- the major change is that- the reflection causes to square the wave velocity- means- the gravitational wave moves by velocity (V), if this wave is reflected, it would move by velocity (V^2) after the reflection- The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- two times in the outer planets and one time only in the inner planets- The Fourth Hypothesis The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time The rate of time use is useful because it enables to accumulate the planets motions energies during a period of time- understandable- Planet motion energy is small energy and the sun rays is massive energy and that necessitates to accumulate the planets motions energies total during a period of time to store motion energy sufficient to be used for the sun rays creation- Shortly- if the planets motions don't use rates of time, no massive motion energy can be provided and for that NO enough energy will be found to produce the sun rays-means- No light beam can be created The rate of time depends on the velocities rate Example (one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock) because Mercury velocity =1.6 the Earth velocity– the hypothesis is explained and proved in details

The Fifth Hypothesis Neptune Motion Causes Negative Effects On The Sun Rays Production Process are (1) Neptune motion caused the gravitational waves to be reflected two times in the outer planets where one reflection is enough for the required process- the wave reflection is repeated by Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion (2) Neptune caused to decrease the gravitational wave speed by one percent- where the gravitational wave moves by speed of light Neptune caused to decrease this speed by 1% creating a speed = (99% of the speed of light=297000 km/s) and by this speed (0.99C) the relativistic effects are created in the solar system

NOTICE The solar system is one machine performs one Job- and this Job is The Sun Rays Production - All planets motions are used as parts to perform this one Job-

The Sun Rays Production Is Done By Two Basic Tasks (1st task) The Provision Of The Sufficient Energy For The Sun Rays Production- and the sufficient energy is prepared by the motions of the five planets (Saturn- Jupiter- Venus- The Earth- The Moon – and Mars) because these five planets motions are used to create the general rate of time based on which The Sun Rays Are Created. (discussed in details in the 3rd hypothesis)

(2nd task) The mechanism by which the light beam is created- and this mechanism is the relative motion- the gravitational waves move relative to the sun point of space- by this relative motion the sun rays are created- means- the required energy is prepared and provided by the aforementioned five planets- and when the sufficient energy be provided this energy is sent to the planets which create the mechanism and the mechanism uses the sufficient energy to produce The Sun Rays The mechanism depends on the motions of 3 planets (Mercury- Venus and the moon) Specially Venus, because Venus reflects the wave toward Mars and defines its trajectory angle to create the relative motion between the wave and the sun point of space- the relative motion is discussed in details in the explanation of the (first and second hypotheses) The Explanation Of The First And Second Hypotheses

Let's remember The 1st Hypothesis This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam – I suppose (The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Nuclear Fusion -Also All Stars Rays Are Created By This Method And No Rays Is Created By The Nuclear Fusion Process) And –The 2nd Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The two hypotheses explain how the sun rays creation depends on the planets motions because The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies as the article states AND The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- The two hypotheses are discussed together in 4 Points

First Point (The Gravitational Waves Source)

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- I provide 2 major proves for this hypothesis which are- (1st proof/ Planet Motion Energy Analysis) and (2nd proof /The Sun Gravitational Field Refutation)

1st Proof / Planet Motion Energy Analysis Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), Let's ask, where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit- Note- the moon velocity is 27.8 km/s BUT the Earth and the moon revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity should be considered equal the earth velocity relative to (the sun) – The 1st Proof Conclusion The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why? The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion that – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

2nd Proof / The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following (1) The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- (2) No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity – Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner creation and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions. (3) The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon- (4) The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation) d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example- Venus orbital distance (108.2)2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3) d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance 50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition. Notice Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation) Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth- (5) Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the explanation of the 3rd hypothesis- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The 2nd Proof Conclusion The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

Second Point (The Gravitational Waves Nature Analysis) Let's ask (1) If The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light While The Planets Move By Low Velocities? Or Generally– regardless the gravitational waves source- how can the gravitational waves move by speed of light? From where the energy is provided to enable the waves to move by the speed of light? (2) Can the gravitational waves be reflected in the solar system? what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties, features and nature? (3) Can the gravitational waves energy be increased? Means can one gravitational wave move by low velocity and this wave motion is accelerated to move by high velocity motion? again from what source the energy is provided and how the acceleration is done? (4) If the gravitational waves are produced by the same gravitational field (The physics book states "the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field") does that mean all gravitational waves move by equal velocities? can some waves move faster than the others? why and how? (5) If the planets data are reflected on each other – can we discover the geometrical reason behind this features? Planet velocity is example where the velocities are defined by the rule (v1v2= constant) this rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- why the velocities are reflected on each other? what's the geometrical reason behind? suppose the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system, why this cause the planets data to be reflected on each other?

(6) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Because the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light) but the waves moves by speed of light only (C=300000 km/s) how the value (C^2) can be produced by the waves motions? (7) If the gravitational waves produce a light beam, does that mean the waves use electric field to produce this light beam? Is there another method to produce a light beam doesn't use electric field or charges? (8) If the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system can we discover that? can we prove that? and can we know in what planet orbit the reflection is done and if the waves are reflected many times?

The Gravitational Waves Properties, Features and nature Here I compare between the two theories about the gravitational waves source and their effects on the waves properties- 1st Theory (The Physics Book Theory) The physics book states, the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- this theory tells little about the gravitational waves properties and nature because the mass gravity concept is puzzled and not understood for that the waves properties and features are puzzled also- let's test this idea- In The Sun gravitational field theory no one knows how the mass gravity force works and if the gravity needs time to work- or if the gravity creates a geometrical design to practice the effect of one mass on the other- the mechanism is not clear and for that the gravitational waves are not clear- for example – no one knows why the gravitational waves can move by speed of light or what waves move by this speed and in what planet orbit or if the wave motion velocity is accelerated gradually from low velocity to high velocity– we shortly know nothing about these gravitational waves- let's ask more questions- are these waves reflected and what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties and nature- where do these waves go? And what's the useful result of these waves energy? can these waves energy be used at all? are there just moving energy in space without an useful goal or result? And The new article tells the gravitational waves move by speed of light can produce a light beam? How these waves can produce a light beam by their motion? DEEP ANALYSIS I wish the respectful reader notices the major change in vision by this article-because- the physics book states the sun rays is produced by the sun nuclear fusion- here- the source of energy is the sun mass and the used method is the sun nuclear fusion- and the light beam is produced Let's put the new article here again This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- the light beam is created by the gravitational waves motions- the article tells- the light beam can be produced by the Motion Energy – The article tells (The High Velocity Motion Can Produce A Light Beam)- here the article removed simply The Sun Nuclear Fusion Machine- the whole machine be useless because the light beam can be produced by (the motion energy)- I wish the respectful reader sees the miracle and wonder behind- There are 2 major changes (1st Change) The source of energy The source of energy is the motion energy– No longer the sun mass be used as the sun rays source of energy- BUT – the motion energy is used as the source of energy – here- the fatal error of the sun nuclear fusion theory is seen clearly – because- the solar system is so rich in motion energy- the moving planets since thousands of years provide massive motion energy stored in the space- and by that- the solar system is very rich system in the motion energy- and we should ask (why do we need an outer source of energy?) why the solar system doesn't use its massive motion energy to produce the light beam? Also if the massive motion energy is not used- where's this massive energy? because it can cause continuous risk for the soalr system stability if no way to use this stored massive energy The sun nuclear fusion theory is completely wrong because it doesn't see the massive motion energy stored in the solar system (2nd Change) the light beam production machine The gravitational waves motions can produce the light beam- this is stated by the article but how? by what method the gravitational waves can produce the light beam? The article doesn't explain how the gravitational waves can produce a light beam? But I put an explanation for this method in my theory discussion

2nd Theory (My Theory) I suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- let's remember my theory because we will use it in the waves properties discussion I asked –where any moving body produce energy by its motion =(1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? The planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as fish swimming creates waves in the water planet motion energy creates waves in the space- means planet moves and creates waves in space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity by that- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and creates waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions create waves move by these planets velocities – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total

I explained this theory before in more details- now – let's discover the gravitational waves properties and features in details- let's put this analysis in the next point (third point) because we need to analyze the wave reflection process to discover the waves properties and features

Third Point (The Gravitational Waves Reflection)

Let's ask Question No.(1) If the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s, how can they move by speed of light? How the velocity 205.8 km/s can be accelerated to be 300000 km/s (speed of light) and where this acceleration is done? Another question can help greatly this discussion Question No.(2) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S)- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Let's think how to answer this question- these gravitational waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) but the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light)- means- the wave velocity is squared- and how can the wave velocity to be squared? This feature I have discovered in the solar system- the waves are reflected and the reflection causes to square the velocities- means- the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the gravitational waves before the reflection moved by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and the reflection causes the velocity to be squared- by that- after the reflection the gravitational waves speed is squared and changed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to be (C^2= squared speed of light) and the light beam is created from this value (C^2) Means- the waves reflection is the method by which the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) is changed into (C^2)- that means- without the waves reflection NO light beam can be created. Notice– the waves reflection is proved strongly in the solar system because it causes to reflect the planets data- means- huge amount of planets data proves the waves reflection–we may remember one example – planet velocity is defined by the rule (v1v2=constant) this rule proves the planets velocities are reflected on each other The paper provides hundreds of similar data proves the waves reflection AND The waves reflection causes to square the velocity- this feature is repeated in the solar system frequently – because- the waves are reflected three times in the solar system for that the velocity squaring is a feature repeated with each reflection and by that the planets data provides a strong proof for it- Shortly- The waves reflection causes to square the velocities- now- let's use this feature to know how the unified wave its velocity (205.8 km/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- (Please note this unified wave is the gravitational wave)

The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s Means the unified wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s BUT If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1 Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1 BUT The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light) That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) NOTICE No. (1) Please note the important observation Without 7.1 the velocity will be only 42683 km/s (even after the waves reflection) and NOT the speed of light That tells- the light beam production process depends on the previous light beam production process- means- a motion by (99%) of speed of light should be found before the wave reflection occurrence and without this motion with (0.99 C) the gravitational waves can't move by speed of light because we need a source for Lorentz length contraction effect with rate (7.1) That tells the light production process is done in chain process, the new light beam production depends on the old light beam and if this dependency is removed the gravitational waves can NOT move by the speed of light and No light beam can be created in this case NOTICE No. (2) We need to pay more attention for the importance of the motion by the speed of light- because the technique of the machine depends on the waves reflection- means- the waves can increase its velocity only by the reflection process – now the reflection causes to square the velocities- this is very important news why?? Because - If the waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s), the waves reflection will produce the value (C^2= squared speed of light) and from this value the light beam can be produced Now – suppose the wave velocity is less than speed of light- suppose the wave moves by speed = (90%) of the speed of light= (270000 km/s) - the waves reflection will square this speed that will produce (0.81 C^2) which is NOT (C^2= squared speed of light) and as a result No Light Beam Can Be Produced (CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013) E-mail [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

3 notes · View notes