#grains supplier & exporter india

[greenxindustries]

Leading Exporter & Supplier of Green Millets, Sorghum Seed, Indian Millets, Roasted Gram, and Makhana Foxnut – Quality You Can Trust!

Are you searching for premium-quality agricultural products? Look no further! At Greenx Industries, we are proud to be a trusted exporter, supplier, trader, and wholesaler of a diverse range of high-quality agricultural products. Our offerings include:

🌾 Green Millets – Nutritious and versatile, perfect for various culinary uses.

🌱 Sorghum Seed – A highly valued crop known for its nutritional benefits and adaptability.

🌾 Indian Millets – A collection of the finest millets, including Pearl Millet, Finger Millet, and more.

🥜 Roasted Gram – Enjoy our carefully roasted grams, available as whole or split, offering a crunchy and healthy snack option.

🌰 Makhana (Foxnut) – A superfood known for its health benefits, ideal for snacking and cooking.

At Greenx Industries, we operate from a state-of-the-art facility in Rajkot, Gujarat, ensuring that our products meet the highest quality standards. Our advanced automatic machinery, combined with a skilled workforce, allows us to deliver products that exceed our customers' expectations.

We have been in the global trade business since 2017, and our commitment to quality and customer satisfaction has made us a preferred partner for businesses worldwide.

🚚 Looking to source these premium products for your business? Contact us today to explore our product range and learn more about how we can meet your needs. Visit our website at greenxindustries.com or get in touch with us directly.

[rmm-1f]

[kapadiyaexpocompany]

[sevenseas12]

Natural Wheat Exporters in Madhya Pradesh, India | Wheat Grain Suppliers in Madhya Pradesh, India || Seven Seas Trade

Seven Seas Trade exports 100% trustable exporter of Yellow Maize in Madhya Pradesh, India. Our company is the world's largest Maize exporter and supplier across India.

[aficgroupexport]

Natural Spices, Organic Grains, Fresh Vegetables, 1121 Basmati Rice and Fresh Groundnuts Exporters and Suppliers in Gujarat, India

AFIC GROUP Import and Export is the leading supplier and exporter of Organic Spices, Natural Grains, Fresh Vegetables, 1121 Basmati Rice, and Groundnuts in Gujarat, India. AFIC GROUP is known for its quality products.

[bhupatiengineering]

Storage Solution Providers in India - Bhupati Engineering

Bhupati Engineering is committed to providing high-quality products and services to its customers at competitive prices. The company's products and services are used by a wide range of industries in India, including agriculture, food processing, chemicals, and storage solution providers. Bhupati Engineering is dedicated to providing sustainable solutions that meet the needs of its customers and the environment.

[vedagriexpo]

Wheat Grain Exporters in Rajkot, Gujarat | Organic Wheat Suppliers in India

[basmatiriceexporterinindia]

                   Empire Basmati Rice Exporter and Suppliers in India

                                             Empire Basmati Rice

We are into processing and export of minimal fat & sugar and cholesterol free Empire Basmati Rice.

Empire Rice is today one of the world's most admired Basmati Rice. The recently launched Empire rice has as such made a big name for itself and is being preferred today all over the world by all health conscious people. The distribution of Empire Basmati Rice would now help uplift the health condition of our consumers .Understandably , Empire Rice helps in improving the cardiovascular health.

Especially grown paddy that is aged for two years and then exclusively treated and processed in a way to evidently make it the healthiest available rice in the market.

The taste, odor , palatability and digestibility of Empire Basmati Rice is incredibly par-excellent .Well , you have to consume to believe it!!

                                   Indian Basmati Rice Manufacturer

                                   Indian Crystal Sugar Suppliers

                                   Indian Tea Exporter

                                   Soyabean Meal

                                   Indian Pluses

                                   Wheat Exporter from India

[determinate-negation]

“This raises the question: if industrial production is necessary to meet decent-living standards today, then perhaps capitalism—notwithstanding its negative impact on social indicators over the past five hundred years—is necessary to develop the industrial capacity to meet these higher-order goals. This has been the dominant assumption in development economics for the past half century. But it does not withstand empirical scrutiny. For the majority of the world, capitalism has historically constrained, rather than enabled, technological development—and this dynamic remains a major problem today.

It has long been recognized by liberals and Marxists alike that the rise of capitalism in the core economies was associated with rapid industrial expansion, on a scale with no precedent under feudalism or other precapitalist class structures. What is less widely understood is that this very same system produced the opposite effect in the periphery and semi-periphery. Indeed, the forced integration of peripheral regions into the capitalist world-system during the period circa 1492 to 1914 was characterized by widespread deindustrialization and agrarianization, with countries compelled to specialize in agricultural and other primary commodities, often under “pre-modern” and ostensibly “feudal” conditions.

In Eastern Europe, for instance, the number of people living in cities declined by almost one-third during the seventeenth century, as the region became an agrarian serf-economy exporting cheap grain and timber to Western Europe. At the same time, Spanish and Portuguese colonizers were transforming the American continents into suppliers of precious metals and agricultural goods, with urban manufacturing suppressed by the state. When the capitalist world-system expanded into Africa in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, imports of British cloth and steel destroyed Indigenous textile production and iron smelting, while Africans were instead made to specialize in palm oil, peanuts, and other cheap cash crops produced with enslaved labor. India—once the great manufacturing hub of the world—suffered a similar fate after colonization by Britain in 1757. By 1840, British colonizers boasted that they had “succeeded in converting India from a manufacturing country into a country exporting raw produce.” Much the same story unfolded in China after it was forced to open its domestic economy to capitalist trade during the British invasion of 1839–42. According to historians, the influx of European textiles, soap, and other manufactured goods “destroyed rural handicraft industries in the villages, causing unemployment and hardship for the Chinese peasantry.”

The great deindustrialization of the periphery was achieved in part through policy interventions by the core states, such as through the imposition of colonial prohibitions on manufacturing and through “unequal treaties,” which were intended to destroy industrial competition from Southern producers, establish captive markets for Western industrial output, and position Southern economies as providers of cheap labor and resources. But these dynamics were also reinforced by structural features of profit-oriented markets. Capitalists only employ new technologies to the extent that it is profitable for them to do so. This can present an obstacle to economic development if there is little demand for domestic industrial production (due to low incomes, foreign competition, etc.), or if the costs of innovation are high.

Capitalists in the Global North overcame these problems because the state intervened extensively in the economy by setting high tariffs, providing public subsidies, assuming the costs of research and development, and ensuring adequate consumer demand through government spending. But in the Global South, where state support for industry was foreclosed by centuries of formal and informal colonialism, it has been more profitable for capitalists to export cheap agricultural goods than to invest in high-technology manufacturing. The profitability of new technologies also depends on the cost of labor. In the North, where wages are comparatively high, capitalists have historically found it profitable to employ labor-saving technologies. But in the peripheral economies, where wages have been heavily compressed, it has often been cheaper to use labor-intensive production techniques than to pay for expensive machinery.

Of course, the global division of labor has changed since the late nineteenth century. Many of the leading industries of that time, including textiles, steel, and assembly line processes, have now been outsourced to low-wage peripheral economies like India and China, while the core states have moved to innovation activities, high-technology aerospace and biotech engineering, information technology, and capital-intensive agriculture. Yet still the basic problem remains. Under neoliberal globalization (structural adjustment programs and WTO rules), governments in the periphery are generally precluded from using tariffs, subsidies, and other forms of industrial policy to achieve meaningful development and economic sovereignty, while labor market deregulation and global labor arbitrage have kept wages extremely low. In this context, the drive to maximize profit leads Southern capitalists and foreign investors to pour resources into relatively low-technology export sectors, at the expense of more modern lines of industry.

Moreover, for those parts of the periphery that occupy the lowest rungs in global commodity chains, production continues to be organized along so-called pre-modern lines, even under the new division of labor. In the Congo, for instance, workers are sent into dangerous mineshafts without any modern safety equipment, tunneling deep into the ground with nothing but shovels, often coerced at gunpoint by U.S.-backed militias, so that Microsoft and Apple can secure cheap coltan for their electronics devices. Pre-modern production processes predicated on the “technology” of labor coercion are also found in the cocoa plantations of Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire, where enslaved children labor in brutal conditions for corporations like Cadbury, or Colombia’s banana export sector, where a hyper-exploited peasantry is kept in line by a regime of rural terror and extrajudicial killings overseen by private death squads.

Uneven global development, including the endurance of ostensibly “feudal” relations of production, is not inevitable. It is an effect of capitalist dynamics. Capitalists in the periphery find it more profitable to employ cheap labor subject to conditions of slavery or other forms of coercion than they do to invest in modern industry.”

Capitalism, Global Poverty, and the Case for Democratic Socialism by Jason Hickle and Dylan Sullivan

[probablyasocialecologist]

In Eastern Europe, for instance, the number of people living in cities declined by almost one-third during the seventeenth century, as the region became an agrarian serf-economy exporting cheap grain and timber to Western Europe. At the same time, Spanish and Portuguese colonizers were transforming the American continents into suppliers of precious metals and agricultural goods, with urban manufacturing suppressed by the state. When the capitalist world-system expanded into Africa in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, imports of British cloth and steel destroyed Indigenous textile production and iron smelting, while Africans were instead made to specialize in palm oil, peanuts, and other cheap cash crops produced with enslaved labor. India—once the great manufacturing hub of the world—suffered a similar fate after colonization by Britain in 1757. By 1840, British colonizers boasted that they had “succeeded in converting India from a manufacturing country into a country exporting raw produce.” Much the same story unfolded in China after it was forced to open its domestic economy to capitalist trade during the British invasion of 1839–42. According to historians, the influx of European textiles, soap, and other manufactured goods “destroyed rural handicraft industries in the villages, causing unemployment and hardship for the Chinese peasantry.”

Jason Hickel and Dylan Sullivan, Capitalism, Global Poverty, and the Case for Democratic Socialism

[rmm-1f]

[maharajabuilders]

[sevenseas12]

Natural Wheat Exporters in Madhya Pradesh, India

Seven Seas Trade exports 100% trustable exporter of Natural Wheat in Madhya Pradesh, India. Our company is the world's largest Wheat Grain exporters and suppliers across India.