#fennec fox gif

[engravedlives]

misc animal graphics stamps

[yagithegoat]

fennec

[stimboard-radio]

Haowen Yang stimboard

✭ with fennec fox stims

✫ RQ'd by anon !

+ | + | +

+ | - | +

+ | + | +

[puyostim]

fennec fox stimboard for an anon!

sources: 🦊 🦊 🦊 🦊 🦊 🦊

[guardian-angle22]

three-month-old fennec fox via the san diego zoo

[safaridays]

stamps i made for all the beasts who're tired of rich pigs owning exotic wild animals as domestic pets!!! feel free to use + i'll probably make more, so feel free to send rqs for animals

[screenshothaven]

Dogs in the Wild: A Nature Miniseries (2023)

[cybersyndicate]

⸺⠀⠀ ⌗Cottagecore(?) Fennec Fox graphics ⦂ for anon

⸺⠀⠀ F2U w/ credit ⦂ likes ++ reblogs appreciated

I hope this seems cottagecore-y,,, probably not. maybe it’s the colors…..

Static image under the cut

[fennecdemon]

animation :3

[purplewillowchicken]

Sliding door moment. In a recent pod cast with Kathy Burke, Michael said, as he has before that the role of Casanova was between him and DT. Got me thinking..

Imagine if Michael was cast instead.

Would Russel T Davis then have cast Michael as Doctor Who?

But he'd have been younger so maybe bit more...

And maybe DT would have been his plucky companion.

Or perhaps

Would Michael then feel he could play Crowley with swagger?

Or more like the book Crowley

And David the angel

Just a good excuse for some DT&MS pics.

Edit. Just noticed the most angelic pic of David I could find is actually Crowley.

[stimboardboy]

fennec fox plush

[polarissketches]

PNGtuber Polaris Support me on P@treon links are in the bio~

[artist-issues]

I had someone tell me recently that Zootopia is about transgenderism.

No, it’s not.

I’m well aware of who directed and wrote the movie. I don’t care. If they were trying to say “transgenderism is a good thing: you CAN be whatever you want to be!” they did a terrible job saying it. Their movie did not say that clearly.

And I don’t think that’s what they were trying to say. I think they were trying to say, “it doesn’t matter what your race or background is; we’re all the same in the ways that matter, so try to understand each other and the world will be a better place.”

That’s it. That’s what the movie said.

But you who’ve listened to the knee-jerk responses will say to me, “are you kidding me, artist-issues, they literally say the line, ‘anyone can be anything!’ all throughout the movie!”

Right. But can anyone be anything, in the movie?

No.

The fennec Fox cannot shapeshift into an elephant. If he could, that would be a great portrayal in favor of transgenderism as a valid identity instead of a mental disorder. But he can’t go from being a fox to an elephant.

That trunk is made of felt; it cannot breathe. He will never get any larger. He has no ivory growing out of his skull. He is a fox, and no amount of feelings or wishful thinking in the movie makes him an elephant—oh, but hey—that fox never actually wanted to be an elephant.

It was a scam. It was a play for sympathy, so that the grown-adult fox could trick bleeding hearts, break the law, and do whatever he wanted.

How’s that shape up, as an argument for transgenderism? Not too good.

Now, do I believe it was an intentional argument being made by the filmmakers against the transgender movement? No. I don’t. Because I know who wrote and directed that movie.

But, again: if it was an intentional attempt to say “you can be anything you want to be,” the movie did a crap job of showing it.

Unless you mean, “you can have any career or position in society you want to have, as long as you work hard, and never mind what faulty judgement gets in your way.” Then, sure, yeah, that’s what the movie was saying.

“But what about the fact that Nick says, ‘everyone comes to Zootopia thinking they can be anything. Well, ya can’t. You can only be what you are. Sly fox, dumb bunny.’ And he was proven wrong!”

Mmkay, but what was he proven wrong about? He was proven wrong about Judy having a character flaw. She has moments of being dumb—giving in to prejudices. But she grew past that, because there’s more to a person than their character flaws. Just like she says to him on the sky-tram: “you are so much more” than a shifty, untrustworthy, sly fox.

And pay attention to what NICK said. “If the world is only going to see a fox that is shifty, and untrustworthy…” Nick does not believe that he is, deep down, shifty and untrustworthy. He’s just chosen to adopt that based on how others see him.

They’re talking about character flaws. All the stereotypes in the movie are just that: they’re stereotypes, based on the type of mammal you are. Not on whether or not you’re a mammal at all, which would’ve been the clearer correlation between Zootopia’s prejudices and the real-world transgenderism discussion.

Zootopia is about racism, and maybe, if you tilt your head and squint, classism. It’s not in any way about sexuality. Nice try. Unless you’re the filmmakers, and you’re somehow spinning it so that you were intending to say something about gender: in that case, bad try. Terrible job, that’s not what your movie succeeded in saying at all.

[plusie]

[motherlove]

Black & Red Food and Animal Stimboard．

☆★☆, ★♡☆, ★☆★.

Requested by : @muttfail．

Like & Reblog if enjoyed．

[stimorca]

fenneko stimboard :3

x || x || x || x || o || x || x || x || x