#don’t assume people’s sexuality
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
grrr cross whump… grrrr making him suffer… grrrr giving him extreme amounts of injury and blood soaking his bones… grrr…
#whump#cross sans whump#cross whump#block those tags if you don’t want to hear me talk about cross abuse!!!!#how much whump is too much whump#it’s not sexual. or suggestive. but like when does it teeter into ‘oh that’s not!’ territory. I don’t want to cross that line#haha get it. cross#anyway when is the line drawn chat#dehumanization conditioning coding humiliation (not in the sexy way)#ive been there written that#not piss btw??#anyway#how much gore is too much gore#when does it become cancel worthy#like i wrote disembowlment#and near-decapitation once#and severed limbs and teeth injury (i don’t like the latter. not my thing)#cw whump#cw gore#mention!#cw violence#cw character abuse#is there liek? a line to be drawn?#tortues is so iffy to write. Like yeah it’s torture it’s bad and it’s angst for a reason#but when does it seem like the author is kind of fucked up and needs help#cuz i dont! literally the only reason i write whump is because i love psychology and like descriptors#and there’s not many descriptors to casual scenes#because not a lot is going on#like yall wouldn’t cancel the saw movies or anyone who watched them. But you get real weird when someone makes horror content#i dont. get off to it?? people assume that a lot for some reason. no i don’t like gore that way i just think it’s cool. i dunno
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
almost replied to an annoying comment and then realized that i don’t have to
#i fear i’m too old and desensitized to be engaging in ‘don’t assume peoples’ sexualities’ discourse
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
We’ve all been screaming about Evan “That’s why you’re so… *bisexual hand gesture* pent up” “Well, I wish I could help.” Buckley, but can we talk about Eddie in that scene?
Eddie has been in the show for 6 seasons and, to my memory (which could be wrong bc I haven’t watched the previous seasons in over a year) Eddie’s never really been “pent up” (due to lack of sex) or anything before.
Like, in s2. That man wasn’t going to cheat on his wife, regardless of the fact that she completely abandoned them for years. Those rose-covered glasses he’s wearing now have been dialed up by a lot, but he was definitely still wearing them while they were separated, so that was at least 2 years without sex. Probably substantially longer, given that he was deployed & then came home injured & then they were constantly fighting. That doesn’t really make for a great sex like.
Then, she dies, and the tsunami & lawsuit & Chris’ trauma all happens, and Eddie uses illegal street fighting to manage his feelings.
I don’t remember him making any comments about wanting to meet someone, or be with someone in the time before Shannon & Ana, and he only went after Ana bc she was there when everyone was telling him not to miss out on anything (even tho he very clearly was not ready) & that’s another 2.
We have the same thing again between Ana & Marisol. We know he’s a family man, but he certainly isn’t making any effort to get any or meet people. He only agrees to go on dates bc his aunt guilts him into it, & there’s a year and a half (roughly) between the EddieAna breakup & him calling Marisol.
Idk, I find it hard to believe that - between being a full time firefighting father & nephew & grandson & friend & basketball games & trauma & mental breakdowns & healing from injury after injury - this man is finding time for regular sex, & we’ve never seen him “pent up” as Buck said.
It just feels very weird to me. Like, that kind of painted Eddie as a man that is concerned with consistently needs to get his dick wet or he gets all sweaty & weird, and that’s never really been his character.
It would definitely make sense if it was anxiety rearing its head and/or his struggle with Catholic guilt. I mean, he consistently uses exercise as a way to let off steam when he’s struggling (in 2x01, when he’s in the gym as he & Buck are butting heads. The street fighting arc. The fact that he has a lot of heavily physically exerting hobbies, even if we don’t see them on screen.)
Idk, to frame it as Eddie not getting laid enough (when they also literally showed us a scene of them doing it the day before?) feels very OOC to me.
Unless Buck was seeing it as sexual tension & not the anxiety that it actually was bc he was feeling sexually charged & projecting????
Idk. I’ve been thinking about this for DAYS & I can’t make it make sense with Eddie’s character.
#911 abc#eddie diaz#911 spoilers#in the bank robbery scene the man literally says “I’ve got 2 full time jobs”#like where is he finding the time to go out & meet people & sleep with them?#idk those are long periods of time to go without just to turn around & be fiending for it after less than 24 hours#and sure being in a relationship might be different but he’s STILL on shifts & hanging out with friends & taking care of his son#that still lives with him#so it’s not like they’re having constant sex then either#I’m assuming Marisol no last name has a job along with her brother & her own social life so add in another scheduling conflict#framing it as him being sexually pent up just makes no fucking sense to me & I genuinely don’t understand it unless Buck’s just projecting
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
that stupid comicbook.com article and also fan response in general to the companion romance situation annoys me so bad for the sole reason that everyone acts like the only people in the game are the pc and playable companions
#mine#dragon age#so many people use dorian as justification and like. you know we could have non romanceable characters who are gay#where’s the people using cassandra as evidence for why this is good actually#‘it limits the types of stories you can tell��� with THOSE specific characters. however there are probably others#i’ll admit i thought it was bizarre that they made every companion romanceable. i hate to make this comparison bc i know everyone has been#saying they’re similar when they’re really not. but that specifically feels like some baldurs gate shit#but like. think of leliana in inquisition. joker in mass effect. etc. characters whose story develops even if they’re not going on missions#it’s just this weird video game conception that sexuality only exists for romanceable characters#(or i should say. people assume every NPC is heterosexual by default. until proven otherwise by a romance arc)#but like. everyone uses the dorian example. his conflict with his homophobic father happens regardless of whether you romance him#it’s not tied to the fact that he’s romanceable. y’all just see sexuality as only relevant when you personally can or cannot smash#idk if the lighthouse will be populated now that we know it’s in the fade but theoretically we’ll have allies#and some of those allies. may identify as something other than cishet#or other than pansexual if that’s the problem but grow up. pansexual characters are not cheap and not lesser#playersexuality is a concept so gamer bros can pretend their companions are straight#because if they don’t interact with dorian and sera they can pretend everyone is straight in this game#here’s the thing like. i can understand the disappointment that every character is romanceable bc. sigh. gaider does make a good point#but that’s not what’s going on here. people are upset the companions are explicitly pan and the game is Woke#and they might try to spin it as ‘b but what about dorian’s arc in a game like this’ when once again#there may be other characters. who are not companions. who we spend time with#varric and solas are literally in all of the stuff we’ve and neither of them are playable#come ON
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
I’ve seen a sliding scale of takes on this but
Sexual repression: Pim > Charlie
Repressed homosexuality: Pim < Charlie
Emotional repression: the same amount but in different directions
#charlie talks#a lot of people assume that bc pim is older he’d be more uncomfortable with his sexuality specifically being gay and I don’t think so#he probably went through all that a long time ago bc like#hes 3’6 and pink. you can’t hurt his masculinity in any that matters#and Charlie is catholic so like. yeah#pim is touch starved as hell tho#Charlie fucks but none of it is that good and he dgaf about it it’s the gay and the emotions that are problems#charpim#minors dni
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
actual conversation i’ve had:
(more than one time)
person, noticing my pride bracelet: are you part of the lgbtq+ community?
Me: eh yeah
Person: cool, what are you?
me: i don’t really label my sexuality. i like who i like.
person: oh, so you’re like pansexual?
me, *bangs head against the table*
#i mean really#every goddamn time#no!#what didn’t you understand with#i don’t label my sexuality?#and i hate when people assume you’re part of the lgbtq+ community just because you’re wearing a bracelet#you can wear it and still be straight?#fuck off#anyway#lgbtq+#lgbtq positivity#lgbt pride#lgbtqiia+#unlabeled#unlabeled sexuality#pansexuel#marauders#gay#biseuxal#pride#pride flag#pride month#queer pride#queer community#raging queer#queer#queer writers#lesbian
80 notes
·
View notes
Text
hey fun fact
it’s not wrong to do whatever you want with fictional characters. they’re fake. they can’t hurt you. you can’t hurt them. they are literally a figment of your imagination.
hey funner fact
it IS wrong to do whatever you want with real human beings. they are real. they exist. you can very much hurt them. their sexualities, genders, opinions, traumas, relationships, lifestyles, and experiences are NOT yours to play with. they’re not a doll. it doesn’t actually matter if you know this person or not. one might even say it’s worse to speculate about a person’s life when you know absolutely nothing personal about them. if you think you’re entitled to fuck with someone’s sexuality or anything related to them without their permission, you are actually just a dick. not a fan, not a real friend, and certainly not in the right.
block me now if this doesn’t agree with you. thanks.
#I saw a gaylor post and it pissed me off#not actually sorry xoxo#don’t ship real people#don’t assume people’s sexualities#don’t be a dick#emme’s bad ideas
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
lacy oh lacy i loathe you lately. and I despise my jealous eyes and how hard they fell for you
#this song#screaming this song#lacy olivia rodrigo#lacy oh lacy#relatable lyrics#lyrics#posting lyrics in 2023>>>#2023 music#olivia rodrigo#guts album#it’s like you’re made of angel dust#music#wlw music#i choose to interpret it as gay#also#genius lyrics describes this song as#“the fourth track sees Olivia blur the line between envy and homoeroticism”#obviously don’t assume peoples sexualities#just my thoughts
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
It’s wild how so many people are fundamentally incapable of recognizing queer characters unless they explicitly say the words, “I’m gay” on screen
#like season 1 and 2? sure maybe you can overlook Will’s queercoding and believe it’s just a result of the bully’s homophobia#season 3 is a huge stretch but it’s hypothetically possible to believe will is just a late-bloomer or asexual#but how on earth do you watch season 4 and still genuinely have no idea will is gay?#and this is not a rare occurrence#it’s astonishing how many people you have to literally explain the van scene to cause Will’s sexuality never crossed their mind#you didn’t see him staring longingly at his best friend the entire season?#some people’s minds are so aggressively heteronormative that they assumed will had a crush on el#and even after noah has explained that will is gay 50 million times#people still are confused and think it came out of nowhere or they quickly forget#somewhere there’s a fan who doesn’t keep up with stranger things news and doesn’t really use social media#a fan who is the exact opposite of chronically online#who hasn’t heard about NOAH coming out let alone Will’s sexuality#who will walk into season 5 and be utterly flabbergasted when Will comes out as gay (let alone when Byler happens)#and they’ll say that Will being gay is a huge plot twist they never saw coming#and they’ll be 100% sincere#and that’s truly baffling to me#do people think shows just randomly include melodramatic rain fights where ‘it’s not my fault you don’t like girls’ is said for no reason?#do people think the show went out of its way to show wills rejecting the attractive girl in his class cause they were in a silly goofy mood?#I genuinely wanna know what goes on through people’s heads when they have no gaydar or media literacy#even today there are people who still think romantic stobin should happen and think that Robin isn’t really a lesbian#will byers#byler
29 notes
·
View notes
Note
also its really fucking telling that you think lesbian = terf. trans men and cis men cannot be lesbians. lesbians do not and cannot fuck cis/trans men. really insane that y’all see anything about lesbianism excluding men and automatically think it’s about.. women? i don’t know why y’all are so fucking obsessed with weaseling your way into a sexuality and gender identity that is exclusive of men, it’s almost like you hate it when ppl want to be away from them. lol
Oh it’s the TERF again lol.
I don’t associate lesbians with TERFs, but responding to someone mentioning trans issues with essentially “god forbid lesbians have anything” is the most obvious TERF calling card you could leave because we weren’t even talking about lesbians.
#Also you don’t know my gender or sexuality#and I’m not going to reveal it#but it would be very funny to come out as lesbian from this post#it’s just honestly fascinating that you assume I’m not lol#and anon I have never tried to ‘weasel’ into any identity or whatever no one actually does that#be normal and log off for a few hours a day and go outside#This weird obsession you have with a nebulous bogeyman trying to sneak into lesbian spaces for an unspecified reason#isn’t actually something that exists in real life#no one is doing that#drink some water#eat a food#because your takeaway from any of this being that I’m a big Man Fan is really funny sorry#I mock cishet men almost daily#it’s my favorite hobby#I would love to put them all on a little island far away from normal people#so the assumption I’m mad at lesbians for not liking men#peak comedy#lol#lmao even
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
...
this is the last time i'll talk about the kpop mia thing i promise. i pinky promise. just have to get this off my chest. (post contains mentions of Unpleasant fanservice elements with underage characters in other shows, not terribly detailed but they are described.)
Imagine if every time someone said they liked Gainax’s beloved mecha classic Gunbuster everyone who heard them assumed it was specifically because of that one locker room scene that is in there more prominently than the scenes of nudity in MiA and feature more visible, more detailed, and more prolonged underage nudity and quite unambiguously exists for the sake of titillation alone
imagine if mentioning you were a Fate fan caused everyone to think you were watching it for the little girls making out in Prisma Ilya or the microbikini-clad underage version of Jack the Ripper in FGO. or saying you liked Gurren Lagann immediately caused people to come running with that one interview where a staff writer randomly said Yoko is 14 while most of the merchandise featuring her is heavily focused on sexualization and fanservice, retroactively rendering the show's many many fanservice scenes with her highly questionable for reasons lying totally outside its established canon
or to take a break from objectionable sexualization even though that's the internet's favorite subject: what if every LOGH fan was assumed to share Tanaka's potential tendency of according validity of Great Man Theory or take an uncritical view of the authoritative military autocracies like the one Reinhard establishes amid a mostly positive framing in the story. there are definitely fans that do this by the way but good lord i can't imagine someone assuming the entire fandom does instead of being prone to creating many healthily-critical diatribes questioning the above, even alongside our great love of the characters of the story and the overall work
like nobody assumes these things because it’s widely agreed there’s lots of other good shit in there for all of those shows, and many fans enjoy them without liking and thumbs-upping everything in it. so can you give us Giant Hole Show Liker People that bare minimum of consideration. huh.
like. man. i’m not out here standing by everything in MiA as something I am pleased is in it — like, fucking duh i’m not, since everyone who’s heard me rant about how the otherwise consistent and fantastically delineated theme of “condemning and inspecting a world that exploits innocents for its advancement and those who partake in this” is veritably kneecapped by some of s1’s dumbass lolisho fanservice moments (that Tsukushi just haaaad to throw in, where trauma and humiliation is thrown into casual everyday life montages and brushed off as funny-sexy), knows perfectly well how i feel about them.
but I’m so so tired of people not affording the fans any consideration that we might like The Fucking Rest Of It when there’s way more mainstream things with worse-or-as-bad elements of underage fanservice whose fandom isn’t assumed to be there primarily for the worst bits of fan service.
like can you just accord people the grace of potentially being human beings with complex opinions and well developed reasoning skills and nuanced opinions
#orphan hole tag#I like gunbuster a lot! and I’ve never in my life seen anyone cancel all its fans for the uncritical-sexualization-of-underage-girls part#because we’re a bunch of adults who don’t assume that watching it means you did so for the Worst Part or cosign every element. amazing#idk maybe the kpop idol fanbase people are mostly really young#and are used to a) idols' manufactured perfection b) fanbases with no gray area between 'love every bit of a thing' and 'loathe every bit'
9 notes
·
View notes
Note
The knee jerk feeling when i hear "lonnie abused will and thought he waa gay because he saw his relationship and closeness with mike like one they them holding hands or something' 🤢
like i promise it’s not inherently problematic for a gay character to have stereotypical gay traits that make them clockable and maybe the point is that lonnie and everyone else do happen to be right about him (even if it’s not based on any actual proof) but they’re wrong about that being something to be ashamed of
#like i won’t lie some of you sound like the “i don’t want will to be gay because it’ll prove his father and his bullies right :(” crowd#as if the most important thing is proving those people wrong instead of being unashamedly who you are in spite of what other people think#because surely it’s impossible for someone to guess someone is gay based on them being gnc they need to have actual evidence right#like obviously we shouldn’t be assuming people’s sexualities but this is something that happens irl all the time#asks
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
#I’m getting war flashbacks#they are real people please don’t#please keep fiction and reality separate and don’t go be weird assuming things about real life humans bc of blorbos#speaking as someone with confirmed blorbo brainrot#also projecting sexualities/indentities on any real person is gross!#so is the idea that someone has to give you personal information re: sexuality and identity to anyone or The World#I will be out here with my bonkin stick if anyone starts asking them these dogshit questions at Cons etc#I know they are fully grown adult men who can handle their own but still#these kinds of things are so wildly uncomfy and unnecessary in fandom#good omens#good omens 2#david tennant#michael sheen
13 notes
·
View notes
Note
I don't even know where people are getting the totally-canon "implied bisexuality" from.... like maybe I'm dumb but I didn't catch any of that in the show???? Like I'm not against either of them being bi but everyone acts like it was confirmed in canon and I feel so lost lol. It just feels like they're grasping at straws to justify their ship being "queer" (as if that has anything to do with why most people don't like it....) and so they can call anti-huntlows biphobic or whatever.
It’s from this, I believe. Hunter sewed a sweater with a rainbow that has what looks like toned down colours of the Bi flag? And Willow being pan comes from the star by her head having the same colours as the pan flag, despite different shades.
Which I think is reading a little into it, because they use like the exact shades and colours for the Bi flag (and the Lesbian flag which I think appears as a sticker?) in that episode. And again, the people who do the design for things like the sweater Hunter sewed, who would’ve put the rainbow there, don’t necessarily pick out the colours used for those designs. Colour design is a separate job.
#asks#anti huntlow#imo it’s kind of lazy to ‘imply’ sexuality with something easily missed.#you know why we know luz is bi? because it’s actually shown Very Clearly.#I’ve talked about this on my spop blog before but I also don’t think we’re really at the stage of representation#where we can have bi characters in m/f relationships and have them be deemed as Super Progressive Woke Rep#because (esp if it’s not showcased they’re same-sex attracted) it’s just going to read as a straight couple#people who are ✨ against the gays ✨ aren’t gonna give a shit about what they assume is a bunch of hets#I’m not like saying you can’t have bi characters in m/f relationships. that’s fine! but let’s not act like it’s making this huuuuge impact#because we all know the ‘impact’ would be bigger if the couple was same-sex (I.e toh getting fucking cancelled for luzmity)
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
trying to strictly define relationships into categories ruined us
#i’m thinking#they do this and this so they are this#no#ew#i hate this#who ever decided to define types of attraction in the first place and eat my lady dick#the type of relationship you have with a person is entirely unique to that relationship#you don’t feel the day way about any two people#and so whatever labels isn’t always gonna fit#it’s so personal these definitions could never be universal#and that’s so cool#i think you should be so vague about the structure of your relationships#they’re will never be just those who types of relationships#because you will have the confusing undefinable ones#let yourself see the nuances of wanting to know / knowing someone#oh#and when any types of closeness is assumed to be romantic / sexual?#i’m screaming#this is a mess of mild frustration#because this not binary but you know what i mean kind of thinking has poisoned my brain#and cause me so much shit#amatonormative#aromanitc#amatonormativity
7 notes
·
View notes