#distrust of women
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
"Mustafa 60" (verse)
youtube
悲しき60歳(sad 60 year old)
In Kyu Sakamoto's song
There is a song by Mustafa, a Turkish youth.
He first saw a beautiful woman
Without his property, to receive her girlfriend.
He became a goldmine. He worked hard.
He became very rich and went to visit her.
She has been already 60 years old...
I can't laugh at Mustafa.
Many stories came to mind when I was young,
I broke up because of ``my lack of emotional preparation.''
In my case, my family environment was abnormal.
My mother, who became manic-depressive, had mental abuse against me.
My father, who was the cause of this, was unable to deal with it properly.
The psychiatric hospital where she was admitted also made a mistake.
Even if I find a woman I love,
My distrust of women had developed through my mother,
I just couldn't be honest with them.
Well, I'll be 60 next year too. I got to know better about women.
But I no longer have the wealth or energy to start a new family.
According to fortune-telling (kanji stroke count fortune-telling),
I am not blessed with a family.
「ムスタファ60」(韻文)
坂本九の曲に
トルコの若者:ムスタファの歌がある。
彼は美女を見初めたが
財産のない彼、彼女を迎えるために
金の亡者になった。しゃかりきに働いた。
大金持ちになり、その娘を訪ねたところ、
彼女は60歳になっていた・・・
私はムスタファを笑えない。
若い頃は浮いた話は幾つもあったが、
全て「私の“心の”準備不足」で別れた。
私の場合、若い頃の家庭環境が異常で
躁鬱病になった母は、私に精神的打撃を見舞った。
その原因だった父は、的確な対処が出来なかった。
母を入院させた精神病院も誤った処置をしたのだ。
私は好きな女性が出来ても、
母を介し女性不信の念が芽ばえていたので
どうしても彼女らに素直になれなかった。
さて、私も来年60歳だ。対女性的に丸くなった。
でももはや家庭を新たに作る財産も気力もないのだ。
占いによれば(漢字の画数占い)、
私は「家庭に恵まれない」とあるらしい。
(2019.08.23)
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thinking about the parallels and differences between Marie Levesque's relationship with Pluto and Maria di Angelo's relationship with Hades
In both flashbacks, we see Hades/Pluto trying to convince them to stay/go somewhere for their and their children's protection and both women refuse his request, but where those scenes differ is in how they respond to him
Maria is so patient and loving towards Hades. She never raises her voice, she repeatedly calls him my love, and yet is firm about not raising their children in the underworld. She only sees the good in Hades - calls him kind, generous, insists the other gods wouldn't be afraid of him if they saw him the way she does. She has unwavering faith that he will protect her, and won't allow any harm to come to Nico and Bianca. There is actual love there, and we get the sense that they did have a good relationship despite him being a god
Queen Marie, on the other hand, deeply resents Pluto. She's angry to the point of throwing and breaking things around her home, and blames him for all of their misfortune. It's Pluto's fault that Hazel is cursed, it's Pluto's fault that people around them are dying, it's Pluto's fault that the police thinks she's a murderer and her clients think she's a witch. Unlike Maria, Queen Marie doesn't believe that Pluto has ever protected them, nor does she want him to, not after how much he has ruined her and Hazel's life. There's little love there like with Maria and Hades, little trust - just bitter angry resentment.
And it makes sense that they would react so differently! We don't get the sense that Hades's godhood has affected Nico or Bianca in any tangible way (at this point, anyway). They're playing together when Hades visits Maria and seem happy. They're not cursed the way Hazel is. They don't have dangerous and harmful powers that they can't control (that we know of). Of course Queen Marie would resent Pluto in ways that Maria doesn't; the wish Pluto granted Queen Marie has actively made their life worse. The di Angelos were fine. The di Angelos were thriving. They had nothing to worry about until the Great Prophecy was issued, and Maria had no reason to believe that Hades couldn't protect them from Zeus when he had protected them thus far. He hadn't done anything to hurt her the way that Queen Marie believed Pluto hurt them.
But here's the thing though: Queen Marie was being manipulated by Gaia. Both she and Pluto tell Hazel that The Voice turned her against him. Just before Queen Marie and Pluto speak to each other in the first flashback, we see her push back against Gaia's request to go to Alaska precisely because Pluto told her it wasn't safe and that he wouldn't be able to protect her and Hazel there. Gaia was the one who convinced her that it was Pluto's fault that Hazel was cursed; after all, it's much easier to blame him than to admit to herself that it was her wish and her greed for "all the riches in the world" that lead to Hazel's predicament.
Gaia preyed on Queen Marie's frustration with herself and with Pluto to manipulate her into bringing Hazel to Alaska to raise her son from the earth. It was this manipulation that lead her to blowing up at Pluto when he tries to convince her to stay in New Orleans. Maria didn't hate Hades because the gods didn't torment her the way Gaia tormented Queen Marie.
Which raises the question: if Gaia hadn't messed with her head, would Queen Marie have loved and trusted Pluto the way Maria loved and trusted Hades? Could Pluto and the Levesques have played happy families the way the di Angelos did with Hades? It's more complicated because Gaia's absence would not have fixed Hazel's curse so it's entirely possible she still would have resented him, but I have to wonder:
Was there ever a world where the Levesques could have been happy?
#maria di angelo#marie levesque#hazel levesque#nico di angelo#bianca di angelo#pjo#meta#mine#also something to be said about how pluto presents as a rich white man#and as two black women in segregated america queen marie and hazel would have every reason to distrust him#in ways that an italian daughter of a diplomat like maria wouldn't feel towards Hades
206 notes
·
View notes
Text
it's the dragon age autism at work but i'm disliking playing the crows literally just because I think they should be shitty bc when you think about it, they are still kind of shitty. When i saw they were going to be a faction in this game i thought 'ohhh hell yeah that's the Stinker Faction' but they're like, good guys....i wanted them to suck :(
I can at least kind of understand why the Lords of Fortune are good guy pirates thanks to Isabela's antics in kirkwall but even then just knowing there was potential for morally gray factions is chipping away 1hp from my healthbar every time i think about it
#veilguard spoilers#and i have to save them if i want to romance lucanis 🙄#which is VERY LAME as well because not once does lucanis talk about how evil his grandma was to him!!#again i actually LOVE this game and it's fun to replay but seeing what it Should be does hurt a little aaaa#why were the writers so scared of morally grey factions and characters....what happened to the bite in the worldbuilding#it gives me the exact vibe chronically online people who hate Bad Things Occurring in Fantasy would approve of#like it's ok for things to be bad...show me that the crows actually suck#show me what it's like being an elf anywhere but especially Tevinter!!#show me dalish being protective of their history and distrusting humans!!#not to mention 'you can leave the qun anytime you want'#the person who has been obsessed with qunari lore since sten invited me back to his home was shaking#i tend to roll my eyes at the nerds who want dark fantasy (violence against women as a crutch) but i still want actual dark fantasy#when you ask for dr pepper but they give your mr pibb in a sippy cup....
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
Separatism is never the answer. All it does is make all of us more vulnerable, and create spaces full of isolated people who are much more easily manipulated and abused by bad-faith actors.
Queer unity is important for all of us.
#my post#lesbian separatism created a space for radfems to indoctrinate people#baeddelism was used to isolate and eventually abuse other trans women#we are stronger together than we are apart#we are more likely to be harmed if we divide ourselves into factions that distrust one another#(yes this is a post in response to what’s been going on in the transandrophobia and transmisandry tags)
913 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thinking about the Chevalier interlude, specifically the inaugural team of Wards. Like in universe, they sell it to this first group of kids (and presumably the rest of the world) as a place for second chances, to find friends and mentors who understand what youre going through, where you can learn to use your powers safely while making good memories. The kids broadly seem to believe in these noble intentions of course, but what really gets me is that I've seen readers buy into it!
"Oh, it's such a tragedy that the Wards program became this awful thing that traumatizes kids even more, and expects them to die for the sake of civilians! It's fallen so short of what it was originally supposed to be!"
No it has not??? The fact that the triumvirate and Hero are saying it has this noble goal doesn't make it true. The Wards was pretty clearly always a way to increase the amount of bodies the prt could throw at threats, and we know this because it was started by the fucking Triumvirate as a part of the Protectorate! Alexandria literally came up with the idea of the Protectorate to legitimize the power of capes, and have a consistent source of heroes Cauldron could throw at problems. That is the whole reason for the PRT/Protectorate existing. So when we have this group of children brought in a subsidiary, there are 2 real options.
1). Cauldron and Alexandria decided they would be really niceys and created this program with no intentions other than helping these kids out.
Or 2). As things got worse, they realized the Protectorate didn't have enough manpower to do what they needed, and so they expanded it to include children (the demographic most prone to triggering). That way, they greatly increase the number of capes who they can send to fight and die as needed, and the ones who do survive their tenure in the Wards will be better trained when it comes time to join the actual Protectorate.
At the risk of sounding conceited, I think the second one is far more likely based on everything we know about Cauldron. Maybe it was originally a little nobler, and the goal was just to create more well trained heroes and cut back on young villains, but there's no way Alexandria, Doc Mom, and Contessa didn't factor in the ability to sacrifice the kid heroes if it improved their chances of success. That was absolutely a perk at minimum.
That's the real tragedy of the inaugural Wards. The kids were lured in with promises of safety, comraderie, and second chances like lambs to the slaughter. All the while, Alexandria and Cauldron knew that many (if not most) of these children would suffer abuse by the prt (like in the case of Reed), die, or face a fate worse than death like poor Mouse Protector. It's horrifying! The idea that they didn't know the danger these kids would be in is literally inconceivable. Especially when one of you is also the head of the prt! They knew, and they didn't care. It improved their chances at the end of the world, and so they did it no matter the cost.
#the same ppl will talk about Taylor being an unreliable narrator who we cannot trust#and then take Alexandria at face value#i think a lot of it is that this genre of guys very uncritically support and assume the best of authority figures#especially law enforcement#in a way that they just dont when it's a teenage girl who's never so much as glanced in the direction of a healthy coping mechanism#the great irony here being that fundamentally the prt/protectorate and Cauldron are all *also* being run by traumatized young women#and also that pretty much every negative opinion Taylor expresses abt the prt is 100% vindicated as the story goes on#genuinely baffled ppl can read Worm and be like 'Taylor's distrust of the prt was irrational'#it's the same energy as calling a woman hysterical#yes this *is* just me remembering the We've Got Worm podcast guys#they are my mortal enemies when it comes to wormposting#worm spoilers#worm#worm web serial#worm wildbow#parahumans
220 notes
·
View notes
Text
The sweetie babie of all time <33
Mitsuri put a lil tie in his hair, I love him w a ponytail I know I keep drawing him like that with a lil’ hair tie but it’s just so cute okay
#kimetsu no yaiba#demon slayer#demon slayer art#artists on tumblr#iguro obanai#kimetsu no yaiba obanai#obanai iguro#kny obanai#demon slayer obanai#mitsuri x obanai#kny iguro#demon slayer iguro#traditional doodles#traditional sketch#obamitsu#if I weren’t so fixated on Giyuu#Ik id love this man to death are you kidding#the only man who can distrust women and it’s valid <3#he’s growing and getting better#I’ve had so many thoughts about him meeting mistrui’s fmaily#her lil brother thinking he looks so cool#her parents teasing her about the man who looks at her like she’s the sun itself#<33333
139 notes
·
View notes
Note
I can't see how the writers still think Skystar's a good person. Like, twelve year old me liked him and thought he was interesting, but I was like twelve. And even I knew he was an irredeemable asshole after Moth Flight's Vision. If a twelve year old can figure this stuff out I have no idea what these grown ass writers were doing.
DOTC has a thesis, stated in The First Battle, that really explains everything.
"Fear and Greed" is just a fake-deep way to reinvent a Good and Evil dichotomy. Because Clear Sky's abuse comes from a place of fear, it means it's not malicious, unlike a "greedy" cat.
He can be "soothed," ergo, he's a fundamentally good person.
Post-First Battle, the books are focusing constantly on his feelings, how sad it makes him to not be trusted, how happy he is when people are on his side. All while he continues to screech at people who tell him what to do, manipulate and mistreat his son, and even still beats and mauls those who offend him.
But because it's "fear," that doesn't matter. That's a justification, an excuse. The writers don't seem to believe in good and bad actions as much as they do good and bad people. True 'evil' comes from a person who hurts others for the wrong reasons, like 'revenge' or malice.
It's abuse apologia. Plain and simple.
The truth is that abusers don't think of themselves as evil people, and everyone, even you and me, is capable of being toxic or abusive. Talk to those who have been abused and we'll tell you; we often stayed because we "saw the good," or even felt responsible for them. Abuse can be passed down through generations because the kids come to believe the way they were treated was normal and okay.
If you go through life thinking that abuse only comes from evil/greedy people, you won't see it when it happens right in front of you. Fundamental good and evil is childish. Abuse comes from fear all the time.
Abuse is about power and control. Fear of rejection, of losing someone, of pain, those are all very common motivators as the abuser tries to stop them from happening before they even begin. It doesn't MATTER that your abuser is in pain too, you NEVER "deserved" what they did in an attempt to break your legs so you wouldn't run.
But... we can all change. Even the worst of us. It's never too late to stop hurting others, move on to a better life, but some people never will. Skystar loves his power, and he keeps that power no matter how many times he misuses it.
He has no reason to change as long as his cruelty rewards him with status and authority.
But the writers are incapable of recognizing that, because for this entire arc, they were stuck in an absurd view of the world in terms of Fear and Greed. Abuse can be excused if he did it for the "right reason," and that makes him "fundamentally different" from the truly evil villains, Slash and One Eye.
Hopefully, it now makes more sense to you.
#I am completely sincere when I say that I am legitimately concerned for the mental health of these writers sometimes#It's a lot of words to say. Again. That evil is really really simple.#It feels good to get what you want.#Power gets you what you want-- Security. Assurance. Respect.#Everyone wants these things.#It's not about having a twisted and sadistic soul#I'm sure those exist out there. But they're so so rare#And you will get hurt if you need to believe that the only person it's okay to leave or distrust or hate is a literal monster#You can leave anyone who tries to control and hurt you actually!!#Even if they're in emotional pain and insist that they NEED YOU#You didn't deserve it! You never did! It's okay! They didn't need to be a monster. And you're not one for leaving either.#Or resenting them. Or recognizing that they can't be trusted.#Of course... well. Clear Sky DOES act like a monster in this text.#Gouging out people's eyes and slaughtering innocent women#But most of the time irl your abuser didn't like. Kill someone lmao#At some point the metaphor breaks down#BUT!!!#cw abuse#dotc hate#Clear Sky#Skystar#Anyway casting spell of I Love You on every abuse survivor who feels a connection here#bone babble
110 notes
·
View notes
Text
I don't know if it's show bias, but I struggle to understand the reading of Moiraine as someone who is so driven by her mission that she doesn't care.
From the get-go, she flees the White Tower for fear of ending up Queen of Cairhien and as cruel a leader as the rulers in her family, although it would have meant control and power;
Getting knocked down and unable to channel, she stabs a former teacher to stop her from killing innocents who have little to do with her mission;
She rushes to the Blight to bond Lan and keep him from basically killing himself, even if again it is a gamble, and later on, the bond transfer is about saving him, albeit cruelly;
She uses her body as a shield to hold off a Forsaken in order to help Rand, sustaining serious injuries in the fight, although her sacrifice is mostly useless considering how overpowered she is;
Many times, she heals villagers, soldiers, Aiel, wolves, sometimes until she is on the brink of passing out;
She fights Shadowspawns in Tear, in the Waste just as bravely as Lan, despite not being battle Ajah and often being surrounded by Aiel who can do the job by themselves;
She tackles Lanfear, toppling with her inside a collapsing ter'angreal, effectively dooming herself and cutting herself from the narrative, to help Rand, Egwene and Aviendha.
Obviously, you could argue that each of these actions would bring her an advantage and in acting so, she was only playing her part in the pattern, without a care for the people she was helping, but that's such an ungenerous reading of the character given what the text provides.
Her mindset is utilitarian and pragmatic, but to see her ever-present doubts, her growing despair and raging hope in Rand and still interpret her as uncaring is mind-boggling to me.
Her whole speech in TSR regarding "People [fighting] for you who do not know it, any more than you know them" tells of someone who believes saving the world will require a lot of collaboration and awareness of each other, not merely machinations and control.
She is a hard woman, but uncaring she is not.
#Wot book spoilers#moiraine damodred#The wheel of time#Remblai#Wot book journey#Saw someone commenting they don't think Moiraine really cared whether Lan lived or die#Look...#I think some people are wilfully misreading the text because if women are obviously evil it justifies their treatment by other characters#They're not#They are complex characters and you can point out a lot of flaws in Moiraine#From the way she tends to treat people as tools/objects to her distrust and secrecy#But to say she doesn't care about the people around her makes me growl#I've seen fans argue that her telling she would kill the boys before they turned to the Dark means she doesn't care#What it says about her is that turning to the Dark is worse than death to her#(which is pretty much Lan's motto)#What it says is that Moiraine will always do the maths and save the most people possible#And if saving more people means killing the Dragon Reborn if they turn to the Dark she will do it#What it doesn't say is that she doesn't care#I already noticed there's a tendency in fandom to be far more generous in interpretation toward male characters#Especially when they share narratives and themes#Tepid take but her mentality is the same as Lan's#But the story spends more time on her so we get more nuance while Lan is afforded a lot more Doylist leeway
156 notes
·
View notes
Text
"Given the marathon that Jane’s uterus had just been through, it’s likely that her uterus would have a reduced capacity to contract and effectively expel the after-birth contents of her uterus; lengthy labours tend to shred the membranes, especially if, like Jane, her membranes had ruptured early in her labour. I believe that here is where the best intentions again contributed to disastrous consequences. Wanting to ensure the best possible outcome, Henry bucked confinement tradition by inviting male physicians into Jane’s lying-in chamber. While we might see a physician’s help as a good thing, please keep in mind that Tudor era physicians weren’t trained in obstetrics. Had Jane’s immediate postpartum been similar to the above description, a physician would likely not have been well-versed in how to manage it. Had the midwives noticed retained tissue, they probably would have known to remove the offending product, manually if necessary, causing Jane further discomfort. To a Tudor physician, this would have been appalling, and protocol dictated that the physicians had seniority. Had they forbade an intervention, it would not have occurred."
— Dayna Goodchild, Jane Seymour and the Birth of Edward VI: A Midwife's Opinion
#jane seymour#mm ... there's literature about the english reformation's impact on midwifery/matrons#that and jane's status as queen - which goodchild notes as a factor that impacted the treatment she received#it's like clarissa atkinson's point that male authorities ''began to compete with women in traditional female work''#i read one article (icr which now!) which talked about the changing theological discourses around the liturgy for baptism#you definitely see evidence of distrust of midwives/cunning women (previously integrated into the event of childbirth) in communities#and iirc there was increasing distrust of midwives performing baptisms#but at the point of jane's pregnancy i think mary fissell has the right of it:#that england's progression from catholicism to quasi-protestantism ''was accomplished through the reform of women's bodies''#and while i don't think it's the most reliable i liked amy licence's point:#''the story of childbirth during the mid tudor reformation is as much the story of the dissolution of the shrines -#- and the banning of catholic practices and folklore that had formed centuries of female wisdom''
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
interesting to me that you could maybe draw a line between jaehaerys misogyny back to being held visenyas hostage, into being on the run with his mother and alysanne. and yet he mimics visenyas iconic style with the long braid…
#inch resting……………#misogyny and/or his distrust of women in power same thing#like the book only specifically mentions nyra mimicing visenyas braid but…….. what assumption am i supposed to make here#jaehaerys i targaryen#my posts
27 notes
·
View notes
Note
Why cant men appreciate tall people like yall do 😭
#any man that doesn't like tall women i instantly distrust#tall people are GORGEOUS#short people too yesyes but i really do see people hating on tall girls sm and like....why?? they deserve sm love#tonytalks
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
natasha has been like. the first character other than sampo or gepard to ever be mentioned in this fic from the first ch and im happy shes finally here. cuz the relationship she n sampo got going on is So Interesting to me. i mean in game sampo is very intriguing to me like theres obviously some level of trust there and a mutual respect considering nat trusts sampo to do jobs for her and sampo goes to her when the trailblazers are in trouble. and him bringing natasha medicine is kinda huge considering his 'selfish' character. like. i dig them having a major mutual understanding and trust towards one another that goes into being protective of each other. i love their situationship
but also i just now realized that. all the other characters in this fic besides sampard will be women and every woman introduced so far has yelled at or at least argued w gepard at some point. lets go girls
#in the bones#also im so intrigued by natasha as like#shes the leader of wildfire and is caring both as a doctor and as the leader#but also has shown distrust and skepticism towards the silvermanes. and she works w sampo#i want to dig into her sense of morality.#maybe im projecting but i feel anarchist vibes from her. like. neutral good#........ ashit. all the other characters in this fic will be women. like#maybe captain dunn will be mentioned or pop in but its all ladies. i have no plans for like. luka or anyone else
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
i had to disclose my medical information every semester to every instructor because i had instructors who wouldn't give me accommodations unless they judged for themselves whether i deserved them and student disability services would not advocate for me, so with that in mind i think it's a terrible shame when institutions can't be trusted to collect private medical information and make fair and responsible decisions, resulting in the public demanding that information for themselves
#the problem is not transparency it's a problem of trustworthiness#we aren't entitled to anyone's medical information and i've felt so gross seeing all this speculation#and talking openly about these athletes' genitals like why is any of this public knowledge#and it's because we can't trust the governing sports institutions#but that doesn't give us the right to become armchair diagnosticians#and it never should've gotten to this point to begin with if there had been due diligence#but we literally don't need to know these medical details all that matters is whether there's an unfair advantage#and i get that unfortunately the track record for upholding fairness in women's sports has been shit so there's no trust anymore#but people are projecting that resentment onto imo the wrong people and assuming malintent where we just don't know#and also can i just say it does feel racialized#so anyway that's my two cents as a disabled woman who was completely let down by an institution that promised equity#and dealt with the brunt of distrusting abled people
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
the last scene with Ironwood in volume 2 really showcases how much of a prick he actually is
#rwb/y#literally the only reason people started defending him is because women started disagreeing with him#it's why everyone was on the 'Ozpin is a lying asshole manipulating everyone' train#until midway through volume 5 when Raven started voicing reasons to distrust him#then suddenly Ozpin was a precious baby who could do no wrong and how DARE anyone question him#a sentiment that got worse with volume 6
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
as a transmasc, i do think it's important to talk abt transphobia we experience, but honestly, the moment a post about it is tagged w trans/ndroph/bia (and especially transmis/ndry) i just roll my eyes and scroll away. it is transphobia. it isn't oppression for being a man, it's for not being what we were coercively assigned as, and frequently those who claim it IS because they're men are also blatant and vocal transmisogynists. it isn't a coincidence that a significant number of the posts i've seen tagged as that also tend to make a point that boils down to "how DARE trans women talk primarily about their OWN experiences first, dont they know I, A MAN, have it WORSE?" and it's like....
why is your response to transfems talking about their own oppression, to make a big fuss about how that doesn't matter because bad things also happen to you for being trans? it has nothing to do with them. you can talk about the transphobia you experience without making it clear that you think what transfems experience is inherently less important or terrible, or somehow an attack on YOU when they talk about it. if you feel so called out when they discuss transmisogyny, then maybe analyse why that is and fix your fucking hearts.
#vv.txt#transmisogyny#while im sure not every transmasc who uses that term is a transmisogynist it is such a large trend that it makes me distrustful of its use#you can be a transmasc and discuss transmasc experiences without aligning yourself with transmisogynists#it actually isnt that hard to care about women without being one. and yet#so often people act like transfems are somehow uniquely harmful for talking abt transmisogyny and calling it out when they experience it#evidently the expectation is that they lay down and take it instead of standing up for themselves#and that is just not an acceptable way to treat people. especially those who are marginalised even within trans communities#im leaving rbs on for right now but the moment anyone is a dick those privileges are being revoked
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
we think an integral part of supporting trans women is accepting that some of them hate men.
3 notes
·
View notes