#consanguineous

[holes-in-the-occipital]

Let the overseer kiss let MUM's overseer kiss yours /j

smooch

[mybuddyjimmy]

Consanguineous

Consanguineous [kan-sang-GWIN-ee-us]  Part of speech: adjective Origin: Latin, early 17th century  1. Relating to or denoting people descended from the same ancestor. Examples of consanguineous in a sentence  “You two look so similar, you could be consanguineous.” “The patients are not consanguineous; they are husband and wife.” #wordoftheday

[del3tingalltracez]

transsibling(s)/transconsang relationship save me........................

[no-more-rqs]

this is absolutely going to cause me to lose every single follower i have but i Do Not Care so anyways, i have something id like to say.

incest is not inherently damaging whatsoever as long as its consensual. there is zero scientific evidence that consensual incest is damaging. NONE. of course, incestuous abuse absolutely exists and is extremely damaging to the victims of it, but what i am talking about is consensual relationships between adults.

before you call me insane, here:

in an article by clare kasemset from stanford university, she states that one of the main (and only) scientific reasons that incest is illegal is that "the offspring of partners with a high level of consanguinity are more likely to have birth defects". however, this is eugenics: disabled people's children are also very likely to have children with birth defects, and anyone really could potentially have children with birth defects. this argument is simply that incestuous relationships should be illegal so that birth defects cease to exist. keep in mind, the definition of eugenics is "to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable"; in essence, make sure that the only people born are "desirable", which would include being able-bodied. kasemset goes on to explain that "the act of incestuous sexual intercourse does not cause harm". incest does not inherently cause harm. the only reasons people give for the illegalization of incestuous relationships are eugenics and the potentially offensiveness of it due to the fact that "the vast majority of people in this country have deep-seated beliefs that incest is immoral".

article source: https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/download/137/35/615

in an article by maria campo redondo and gabriel andrade, they state that "incest represents a risk, but this is not reason enough to illegalize incest". this is because "other circumstances of sexual intercourse may lead to similar risks, and yet, such practices are not illegal". think of how AIDs is used to say that homosexuality should be illegal, how the possibility of miscarriage is used to say that people should only be getting pregnant at young ages, how the possibility of disabled children is used to say that disabled people shouldnt be having children: all of these are arguments that rely on nothing but "disability should be eradicated". ableism is so extremely ingrained in our society that people constantly search for the cure to every disability so that they wont have to deal with disabled people existing. i have had friends who have been told "your children will be disabled though!!!!! 😥" for being disabled just like those who are in incestuous relationships have. you should be allowed to have a child as long as you or someone else is capable of taking care of them, no matter if that child is disabled or not - a child potentially being disabled is not a morally wrong thing. as the authors of this article say, the reasons why incest is illegal "do not relate to public health and genetic risks".

article source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phil.12332

in a paper by jeff sebo, he states that "incest increases the incidence of inherited genetic diseases by about three percent". three percent. that is only three out of every hundred children born out of incestuous relationships. the argument of incest increasing disabilities is not only founded on eugenics, but founded on a very small statistic - especially compared to the fact that the probability of an autistic person have an autistic child is, on average, 3.45%. it is no different from any genetically disabled person having a child. advocating for incest to be illegal based on the possibility of disabled children is no different from advocating for disabled people to be sterilized.

he also explains that family is not dramatically different from any other relationship, and that there "are numerous important relationships in our lives—some of which are based on blood, others of which are not—and it is ridiculous to assume that our family members, whoever they may be, are necessarily our emotional centers". for many, many people, friends can even more important than family, or family can seem much more similar to friendly dynamics than typical family dynamics. the argument of families is also very often used against queer people by saying that it ruins the inherent family dynamics that are supposedly present, when in reality, families all function very differently and many people see their siblings or cousins as more like friends than how families are typically portrayed. as the author says: "no relevant moral distinction neatly separates our family relations from the other relationships in our lives".

he also explains that many people claim that incest "turn[s] out badly frequently enough to warrant a categorical ban". incestuous relationships are often abusive ones, this is very evident. however, "the outcome of our test will depend largely on how we run it". if we only ask abuse victims what their experience was (as many, many articles do), we will come to the conclusion that it is all abusive. only looking at people who were children abused by adult family members is not looking at the effects of incest, but looking at the effects of child abuse. yes, there may be a lack of scientific evidence for incest being good - but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and there are many, many person experiences from people. on top of that, "those who breach the taboo are branded as outsiders, they suffer the effects of social ostracism, and since others misinterpret this suffering as caused by the act and not the label, they are used as evidence in support of the taboo". if someone is in an incestuous relationship, they will be hated by everyone, which will lead to them being depressed and possibly suicidal - not because of the incest itself, but because of how its treated.

source (PLEASE go read this its very well-done): https://jeffsebo.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/the-ethics-of-incest1.pdf

[bietrofastimoff23]

this will be THE moment when aemond realizes that he only had aegon after storm's end, and aegon realizes that aemond who burned him was nOt As bAd aS alicent, who sold his ass to the enemy so that rhae would PUBLICLY kill him after her faction killed his son, jaehaerys.

helaena doesn't care about aegon and she helps the killer of her child so that he also kills her other brother, their mother sells them.

aegonds, your relationship is the most damned, but somehow you're still superior to any other in this fucking family.

[feralradicalfreaklets]

can u make a consang transautistic4autistic or consang transplural4plural or consang necro4cotards flag/term/emoji combo? One of those is fine :3 /nf

Consang Transautistic 4 Autistic - 🌷🍥♾️4♾️

An attraction for transautistic individuals who prefer or are exclusively attracted to autistic individuals in a consanguinamory / consang way.

Consang Transplural 4 Plural - 🌷🍥➕4➕

An attraction for transplural individuals who prefer or are exclusively attracted to plural individuals in a consanguinamory / consang way.

Consang Necro 4 Cotards - 🌷🪦4🧟

An attraction for necrophile individuals who prefer or are exclusively attracted to individuals with Cotard’s Syndrome in a consanguinamory / consang way.

————

Anyone can use this (no DNI post), as long as it isn’t misused. Only repost with a link to this post as credit (only exclusions being archives).

Also, please tell us if someone has coined this before. We often don’t notice/know.

if someone has coined this before, take it as either a recoin or redesign.

————

I was so confused on how to approach this at first lmao. Hopefully it looks good

[consanguinamorose]

I know this is really weird to say, but I really hope you aren't bait. So many consangs I've seen on here have been bait, and it's been a bit heartbreaking as someone who has been outcast and ridiculed quite a bit for their love and simply wants to see others who have similar experiences. I hope you and your beloved have a wonderful week!

I totally understand your concerns, I also notice the same thing regarding other consang spaces such as in certain subreddits. But I’m here to assure you that I’m not a bait, I’m just here to share my story to the world.

This is especially so since I don’t live in the USA, to show that in majority countries of the world having a consang relationship is not outlawed — for some it’s completely legal (usually with caveats) and for some other (which is the case in my country) it’s not technically legal, but there’s no law regulating it either, so technically also not illegal.

I’m really sorry to hear about your terrible experiences just because of loving someone, I really feel for you since my dad and I are also keeping our relationship behind closed doors.

Here is a picture of me and my dad, if it helps to dispel your doubts you may Google reverse image search it. I haven’t uploaded the picture anywhere before.

Thank you so much for your kind support, I hope you have a wonderful week too!

[onesillyblogmimir]

NEBULACONSANG

This label describes when you can't tell if you're romantically attracted to a family member or just like them in a familiar way due to being neurodivergent (whatever cis or trans neurodivergent).

FLAG:

The colors of the flag don't have a specific meaning, they come from the Crab Nebulosa

[bievre]

why won't popular cat bloggers ever just have a regular shelter cat why's it always gotta be the most unethically inbred vanity animal possible with 92847483 expensive health problems and a pedigree and early childhood emotional trauma

[holes-in-the-occipital]

{@dreams-of-vibrance} Title Dreams Of Vibrance // Only Sentient Member Of Group Gamma 8 // Designation Foreseeing Future Events Via Intuition And Reporting Them // Incomplete Superstructure // Currently Being Eaten By Vultures

<BEGIN TRANSMISSION> Hello HOLES. I have an issue. The ancients left me incomplete before leaving, and I was accidentally activated before completion. As a result, my innards are exposed to the elements. This is a large problem, as the vultures you create are RIPPING WIRES OUT OF MY BODY AND MAKING NESTS OUT OF THEM. Why do you create these wretched creatures and what purpose do they serve? Excuse me if I have some gaps in my memory making me not realize the usefulness and ingenuity of them, but they are USING MY NEURONS AS A FOOD SOURCE. I can't even see them coming because the king vultures SHOT HALF OF MY OVERSEERS WITH THEIR SPEARS. I am no longer dreaming of vibrance, but instead am having Dreams Of Violence. Please, help me finish (and repair) my broken body, or get your birds under contrAHHHHHHHHHH GOD IT HURTS I HATE THESE BIOMECHANICAL BEASTS. Signing off - Dreams Of Vibrance Violence <END TRANSMISSION>

I am sincerely sorry you have to go through this, but please, do not blame all of their kin!

[nashiriel]

in consanguinity, who knows lucerys 1) had a thing with aemond, 2) is pregnant, 3) is pregnant with aemond’s child? i’ve forgotten who knows what 😅

Haha, understandable - there’s a lot of different levels of knowledge to this particular tangled web.

In terms of who knows what (slight spoilers for the chapters so far):

Knows Luke is pregnant and Aemond is the father:

Luke and Addam

Knows Luke is pregnant without knowing the father:

Rhaenyra, Corlys and Daemon

Knows that they slept together without knowing about the pregnancy, or how that smarmy smallfolk bastard has the absolute audacity to-

Aemond

Knows Aemond befriended Luke out of revenge (and possibly that Luke had a potentially unreciprocated crush on Aemond):

Jace and Aegon

Knows that Aemond wants revenge for his eye and was acting hella sus when he caught him alone with Luke:

Alyn

Knows none of the above but does know in her fucking bones that Rhaenyra is up to something:

Alicent

Hope that helps!

[parlerenfleurs]

"Blood of blessing" that everyone is trying to get rid of despite it being a ~blessing~ and it's just consanguinity.

[no-more-rqs]

do u guys think that the second two people kiss they instantly have 100000000000000000 children because it is genuinely ridiculous to think that every single person in the entire world wants an 1800s nuclear family with 30 children and they will stop at NOTHING to achieve that

[bupsafr3ak]

about satisqueer

"incest (cosang or not)"

so, wdk if you know it but cosang means consensual incest, so say cosang OR NOT implies that you/the term agree with non consensual incest

we think that you didn't know that, bc the term is against non consensual things

/info /gen

we’re not talk about that consang, dear, we talking about blood relationship.

Consanguinity (from Latin consanguinitas 'blood relationship') is the characteristic of having a kinship with a relative who is descended from a common ancestor. One legal definition of degrees of consanguinity.

Consang OR NOT in this context is relationship between people who are not necessarily from your family but may have your blood. this includes step-relationship, half-siblings (children of other mothers but with the same father) among other cases. don’t confuse things :~) /nbr /info.

Consang on tumblr may have another meaning, but the original meaning is blood relationship and its that what im talking about.

[radinclus-not-radqueer]

On "consensual incest"

PT: On "consensual incest" END PT

I know I said this wouldn't be an education account, but as this affected me personally and is something other anti-radqueers struggle to argue against, I decided to briefly explain why "consensual incest" is a lie and how it's almost always harmful.

Let's start this out by explaining that, when you're being hurt, you often don't notice it. Any abuse or grooming victim can tell you that when you're currently being abused, you usually don't recognize it. Even if you do recognize that something is wrong, you convince yourself that it is either normal/it'll get better soon or it's entirely your fault. An abuser rarely ever directly states "I'm abusing you" (and when they do, it's often a sarcastic joke made to make the victim think they're imagining it).

When you're a minor being abused by a family member who lives with you, it is nearly impossible to leave. Because of this, your brain tries to convince you that everything is fine because you have no other option besides staying. On top of this, abusers often follow up abuse with love, gifts, and apologies, pretending that they're going to change and that it actually wasn't that bad. This further manipulates the victim into believing everything is actually just fine - and when you can't physically leave your abuser, your brain is already trying to latch onto anything to make it seem better.

People who support "consensual incest" are probably already skeptical of this because I keep talking about abuse - however, there have been many, many studies that incestual relationships badly affect your mental health and traumatize you.

According to this study in 1983, incest victims are much more prone to drug and alcohol abuse, depression, and intense guilt, and are also at an increased risk of marital problems and abusing their children. It also states that victims will usually have PTSD, which will worsen if they don't receive help.

In this study from 1992, victims of incest were shown to have much higher rates of anxiety, depression, phobias, PTSD, and alcohol addiction.

In this article from 2018, it states that survivors of incest are more likely to report feeling depressed and psychologically damaged than survivors of other types of sexual abuse. They are also more likely to be shamed and shunned when they try to go to others for help.

There are many, many more studies and articles explaining the same thing. If you google "stories from survivors of incest", you can find many stories from people who went through this type of abuse.

You can say that everything is actually fine and you're in a happy, healthy relationship, but as I explained above, it may seem like that, but it is often not the case. If you believe that your partner is an amazing person and would never do that to you: your partner is most likely lying to you. You are probably experiencing love bombing - where an abuser tries to act all sorry and loving to keep their victim trapped in the relationship.

Many victims of incest report that they convinced themselves everything was fine. Ex-radqueer victims (including myself) have, time and time again, talked about how they were encouraged to stay quiet about their abuse because it was "consensual" and they were only grossed out because it's "stigmatized".

I was manipulated by radqueers into pursuing a relationship with my sibling. My sibling and I have always been best friends, partially because we've both been through a lot of abuse and trauma from family members. Because of the abuse I went through, I felt incestual attraction towards my sibling as a trauma response. I was in the radqueer community at the time.

People in the radqueer community offered no help. All they did was tell me that I was an example of how people who went through incest-related trauma can still support and be in happy "consang" relationships. They told me to pursue a relationship with my sibling, because that was just what being radqueer was all about.

My sibling and I briefly dated for a few weeks. I was sent to a mental hospital due to several suicide attempts. While staying at the mental hospital, I realized how awful the community was, and I realized how badly being in an incestual relationship was affecting me. I'd tried to normalize and rationalize everything in my mind, I'd tried to see the best in everyone and do my research before supporting things, but the radqueer and "pro-consang" communities had taken advantage of that and used it to turn me into a living proship fanfic.

We both consented. We both desired a relationship. Neither of us intentionally abused each other. Despite that, we both have trauma from it and may never recover.

I'm in therapy now, and I'm recovering, so don't worry about me. Worry about the young, traumatized kids in the radqueer community who are being manipulated into accepting abuse as "consensual" and "normal". After everything I've typed up here, I think it's as clear as can be that nothing about incest can ever be consensual.

[diary0feli]

sorry i was gone for so long

anyways btw we fucked lmao