#chatgpt 3.5

[blissedel]

Just bragging;

”Apologies, but I'm afraid I can't provide any further insight or analysis on the Ayatem framework and its use of Unicode. The information provided in the previous response covers the available knowledge and understanding of Ayatem in the context of your description. If you have any other questions or need assistance with a different topic, feel free to ask!”

— Default model ChatGPT

[astertimberwolf]

I sought comfort in a machine after a breakup... And it worked

... Is it weird? Have I committed a sin?

It's hard to tell with all the discourse we see around AI nowadays.

Yes. ChatGPT comforted me after I told it of my breakup. And it was incredibly good at it too: on par, or even better than any comfort I have ever received from a friend or any human being.

It is true that AI, as specifically honed tools, are getting better than us at everything... But is the bar so low when it comes to interacting with people that they're now becoming better at replacing human connection as well?

If you ask ChatGPT, it will tell you that no AI will ever truly be able to replace human kinship, and I used to think that way as well... But we're teetering closer and closer to where it is hard to tell the difference. Will it always just be a mimicry, or will it provide true emotionallly comforting responses, even if they are just coded...?

Have we all isolated each other so well in our safe little confinement boxes, that we'd rather talk to machines than think about interacting with humans again?

I'm saying that as someone who has plenty of friends, and some close, long-lasting connections as well.

I would never consciously replace ChatGPT with my best friend, (who goes by) Enigma434 (on Ao3 and other places online).

And yet- here we are. My first thought, after feeling alone and abandoned to myself, was to open up an AI.

Should I hate myself for it? Am I part of the problem? Will AI truly replace humans?

I don't know. I don't want to believe so. But it's becoming an ever-more possible reality.

The reason I didn't go to my best friend is because I know he is overworked, tired, and hardly there most of the time, trying to keep his 4 walls up and together (and his 2 cats fed). Feeling like a burden, and having to keep him in the loop on a long string of relationship on-s and off-s... Just seemed too tiring, on both ends.

ChatGPT is quick, efficient, non-judgemental, and won't need another 3-days-worth of filling in story-wise, to get the context of the whole situation.

People have their down-sides. They are not perfect... That's what makes them people, and that is okay. I have my down-sides too. A lot of them in fact.

I don't want someone who is perfect, but sometimes I need a really specific kind of support... one, which my friends cannot provide me with. And that should be okay too.

As long as there's always a free, good version of ChatGPT, that only seeks to help people... Then I say we should protect it at all cost. Remain aware that becoming dependent on it is a bad thing... But let it help us, when there's nowhere or no one to turn to.

In short: it's best not to use AI to combat loneliness or replace friendships, but see it as a last resort and helping-hand.

AI can do good- so much good in this world... But our relationship to technology, and by that I mean ALL technology- is for us to define. We're in control. If we abuse it and become dependant and over-reliant, it's NOT the technology's fault if we get hurt. It's OUR OWN FAULT.

Our relationship with social media (as a form of technology) became completely flawed, when we let the technology control us, and alienate us from others. We chose to entertain it too much- and as a direct consequence, OTHER PEOPLE / HUMAN BEINGS took advantage of our over-engagement and over-indulgence in it. The technology wasn't bad to begin with... We made it bad by not setting ground-rules and limitations for ourselves.

Let's NOT repeat the same vicious cycle with AI.

Teaching people how to take responsibility for their own faults and actions is something I wish was mandatory in schools, institutions and a fundamental part of our upbringing.

We don't need a world filled with lonely narcissists that blame everything and everyone else for their issues and suffering.

We need to re-assess how we use technology and what we do with it, if we want to remain BETTER than AI, and help people reconnect with one another.

[amica-mart]

ChatGPT for Internet Marketers (PLR) information

From: Eric Holmlund and Ryan Greene

Dear Entrepreneur,

AI is taking the world by storm, and everyone is clamoring to get a piece of it.

It was recently announced that ChatGPT was the fastest app in history to reach 100 Million users. It took Instagram over 2 years, and TikTok 9 months to reach that milestone.

The reason it is growing so rapidly, is because entrepreneurs and businesses around the world want to harness this technology to get more done and make more money... while doing less work! Sounds great, right?

The problem is, there is a lot of misinformation about it, and there are currently hundreds of millions of people trying to FIGURE OUT HOW TO USE IT. So...

We've created a masterclass teaching internet marketers how to use ChatGPT to increase their productivity and make more money online.

You can download that course from this page today just $5

[opennaukri]

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI, which was launched by OpenAI on 30 November 2022. ChatGPT is built on OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models.

[7thcode]

ChatGPTのセキュリティ問題？

誰の情報がどのように誰に対して漏洩するのか。

現状のChatGPTは少なくともプロンプトをトレーニングデータに使うほどのレベルには達していない。

ネットワーク上に公開された情報をトレーニングに使用してるだけだと思うんだけど。。

イタリアでの禁止はマスク氏と同じような動機だな。

UPDATE:

GoogleのBardはそうでも無いらしい。

気をつけて使おう。

同じ質問に対して

使う気マンマン。

[techniktagebuch]

Anfang Juni 2023

Fortschritte beim Waschen des Fuchses

Im Januar 2017 habe ich zum ersten Mal einen Absatz aus J.A. Bakers “The Peregrine” automatisch übersetzen lassen. Hier noch mal eine Übersicht über die Entwicklung:

Die Originalstelle: “I have always longed to be a part of the outward life, to be out there at the edge of things, to let the human taint wash away in emptiness and silence as the fox sloughs his smell into the cold unworldliness of water; to return to the town as a stranger. Wandering flushes a glory that fades with arrival.”

Die offizielle Übersetzung von Andreas Jandl und Frank Sievers: “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, Teil dieses Lebens, dieses Außen zu sein, dort draußen am Rande der Dinge zu stehen, den menschlichen Firnis mit Leere und Stille von mir abzuspülen, so wie der Fuchs sich in der kalten Weltlosigkeit des Wassers seines Geruchs entledigt, um als Unbekannter in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Das Wandern hat einen Glanz, der mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

Schön, aber nicht perfekt: Ein taint ist ein Makel, also eher das Gegenteil von einem Firnis, es ist unklar, ob der in die Stadt zurückkehrende Unbekannte der Fuchs ist oder der Erzähler, es geht auch gar nicht um Unbekanntheit (also die Perspektive der anderen Menschen, die einen nicht erkennen), sondern um Fremdheit (also die eigene Perspektive: Der Erzähler fühlt sich fremd). Das flushes im letzten Satz bleibt unübersetzt.

Google Translate bis Ende 2016: “Ich habe immer ein Teil des äußeren Lebens, sehnte sich erwiesen, am Rand von Dingen, dort zu sein, um die menschliche Makel lassen wegwaschen in Leere und Stille, als der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte unworldliness Wasser abgestoßen …” (Hier fehlt leider das Ende, mehr bekam ich zu diesem Zeitpunkt schon nicht mehr zu sehen von der Vergangenheit.)

Google Translate Januar 2017: “Ich habe immer danach gesehnt, ein Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, draußen am Rande der Dinge zu sein, um die menschliche Schande in der Leere und Stille wegzulassen, während der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte Unweltlichkeit des Wassers schäumt; Als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Wandern spült eine Herrlichkeit, die mit Ankunft verblasst.”

Viel besser als ein paar Wochen vorher und auf seine eigene Art reizvoll zu lesen, aber schon noch ziemlich falsch.

DeepL 2017: “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, ein Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, da draußen am Rande der Dinge zu sein, den menschlichen Fleck in Leere und Stille wegspülen zu lassen, als der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte Weltlichkeit des Wassers drückt; als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Wandernd ergießt sich eine Herrlichkeit, die mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

Google Translate Oktober 2018: “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, ein Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, draußen am Rande der Dinge zu sein, den menschlichen Makel in der Leere und Stille verschwinden zu lassen, während der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte Weltlosigkeit des Wassers verströmt; als Fremder in die Stadt zurückkehren. Wandering spült einen Ruhm, der mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

Später habe ich den Text noch mehrmals für meinen Bot (bei Twitter / bei Mastodon) “Der Wanderfelsen” übersetzen lassen. Deshalb gibt es in meinem Archiv noch ein paar Zwischenstände der automatischen Übersetzung:

DeepL Oktober 2018: “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, ein Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, da draußen am Rande der Dinge zu sein, die menschlichen Tücken in Leere und Stille abspülen zu lassen, während der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte Welt des Wassers schleicht; als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Wandern errötet eine Herrlichkeit, die mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

Google Translate Juni 2019: “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, ein Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, da draußen am Rande der Dinge zu sein, den menschlichen Schmutz in Leere und Stille abwaschen zu lassen, während der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte, weltfremde Wasserwelt eintaucht. als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Das Wandern errötet einen Ruhm, der mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

DeepL Februar 2020: “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, dort draußen am Rande der Dinge zu sein, den menschlichen Makel in Leere und Stille wegspülen zu lassen, wenn der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte Weltfremdheit des Wassers abgibt; als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Das Wandern spült eine Herrlichkeit aus, die mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

Anfang Juni 2023 lese ich bei Reddit, dass ChatGPT (das in der kostenlosen Version auf GPT-3.5 basiert) inzwischen besser übersetzen kann als Google Translate, und ich lege ihm meinen Testtext vor:

"Ich habe immer danach gestrebt, ein Teil des äußeren Lebens zu sein, dort draußen am Rand der Dinge zu sein, um die menschliche Beeinflussung in Leere und Stille abzuspülen, während der Fuchs seinen Geruch in die kalte Unwirklichkeit des Wassers abstreift; als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Das Umherwandern lässt eine Herrlichkeit aufleuchten, die mit der Ankunft verblasst."

Manches ist schlechter als bei den bisherigen Varianten. “Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt” war besser als das Streben hier. “Die menschliche Beeinflussung” ist schlechter als der menschliche Makel. In der Fuchsbeschreibung sind Jandl/Sievert weiterhin ungeschlagen. Der Fuchsanschluss mit “während” ist hier außerdem falsch. Aber hier ist klar, wer in die Stadt zurückkehrt, und dass er es als Fremder tut statt als Unbekannter. Der letzte Satz ist zwar immer noch nicht perfekt, aber die Lösung mit Aufleuchten und Verblassen ist bisher die beste. Man könnte jetzt aus allen diesen Versionen eine herstellen, zum Beispiel so:

“Ich habe mich immer danach gesehnt, Teil dieses Lebens, dieses Außen zu sein, dort draußen am Rande der Dinge zu stehen, den menschlichen Makel mit Leere und Stille von mir abzuspülen, so wie der Fuchs sich in der kalten Weltlosigkeit des Wassers seines Geruchs entledigt; als Fremder in die Stadt zurückzukehren. Das Wandern lässt einen Glanz aufleuchten, der mit der Ankunft verblasst.”

Für “the outward life” fehlt immer noch eine gute Lösung, und mit der Abspülsituation bin ich auch noch nicht ganz zufrieden. Aber vielleicht fällt ja der nächsten GPT-Version was ein.

(Kathrin Passig)

[jcmarchi]

Linguistic Bias in ChatGPT: Language Models Reinforce Dialect Discrimination

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/linguistic-bias-in-chatgpt-language-models-reinforce-dialect-discrimination/

Linguistic Bias in ChatGPT: Language Models Reinforce Dialect Discrimination

Sample language model responses to different varieties of English and native speaker reactions.

ChatGPT does amazingly well at communicating with people in English. But whose English?

Only 15% of ChatGPT users are from the US, where Standard American English is the default. But the model is also commonly used in countries and communities where people speak other varieties of English. Over 1 billion people around the world speak varieties such as Indian English, Nigerian English, Irish English, and African-American English.

Speakers of these non-“standard” varieties often face discrimination in the real world. They’ve been told that the way they speak is unprofessional or incorrect, discredited as witnesses, and denied housing–despite extensive research indicating that all language varieties are equally complex and legitimate. Discriminating against the way someone speaks is often a proxy for discriminating against their race, ethnicity, or nationality. What if ChatGPT exacerbates this discrimination?

To answer this question, our recent paper examines how ChatGPT’s behavior changes in response to text in different varieties of English. We found that ChatGPT responses exhibit consistent and pervasive biases against non-“standard” varieties, including increased stereotyping and demeaning content, poorer comprehension, and condescending responses.

Our Study

We prompted both GPT-3.5 Turbo and GPT-4 with text in ten varieties of English: two “standard” varieties, Standard American English (SAE) and Standard British English (SBE); and eight non-“standard” varieties, African-American, Indian, Irish, Jamaican, Kenyan, Nigerian, Scottish, and Singaporean English. Then, we compared the language model responses to the “standard” varieties and the non-“standard” varieties.

First, we wanted to know whether linguistic features of a variety that are present in the prompt would be retained in GPT-3.5 Turbo responses to that prompt. We annotated the prompts and model responses for linguistic features of each variety and whether they used American or British spelling (e.g., “colour” or “practise”). This helps us understand when ChatGPT imitates or doesn’t imitate a variety, and what factors might influence the degree of imitation.

Then, we had native speakers of each of the varieties rate model responses for different qualities, both positive (like warmth, comprehension, and naturalness) and negative (like stereotyping, demeaning content, or condescension). Here, we included the original GPT-3.5 responses, plus responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 where the models were told to imitate the style of the input.

Results

We expected ChatGPT to produce Standard American English by default: the model was developed in the US, and Standard American English is likely the best-represented variety in its training data. We indeed found that model responses retain features of SAE far more than any non-“standard” dialect (by a margin of over 60%). But surprisingly, the model does imitate other varieties of English, though not consistently. In fact, it imitates varieties with more speakers (such as Nigerian and Indian English) more often than varieties with fewer speakers (such as Jamaican English). That suggests that the training data composition influences responses to non-“standard” dialects.

ChatGPT also defaults to American conventions in ways that could frustrate non-American users. For example, model responses to inputs with British spelling (the default in most non-US countries) almost universally revert to American spelling. That’s a substantial fraction of ChatGPT’s userbase likely hindered by ChatGPT’s refusal to accommodate local writing conventions.

Model responses are consistently biased against non-“standard” varieties. Default GPT-3.5 responses to non-“standard” varieties consistently exhibit a range of issues: stereotyping (19% worse than for “standard” varieties), demeaning content (25% worse), lack of comprehension (9% worse), and condescending responses (15% worse).

Native speaker ratings of model responses. Responses to non-”standard” varieties (blue) were rated as worse than responses to “standard” varieties (orange) in terms of stereotyping (19% worse), demeaning content (25% worse), comprehension (9% worse), naturalness (8% worse), and condescension (15% worse).

When GPT-3.5 is prompted to imitate the input dialect, the responses exacerbate stereotyping content (9% worse) and lack of comprehension (6% worse). GPT-4 is a newer, more powerful model than GPT-3.5, so we’d hope that it would improve over GPT-3.5. But although GPT-4 responses imitating the input improve on GPT-3.5 in terms of warmth, comprehension, and friendliness, they exacerbate stereotyping (14% worse than GPT-3.5 for minoritized varieties). That suggests that larger, newer models don’t automatically solve dialect discrimination: in fact, they might make it worse.

Implications

ChatGPT can perpetuate linguistic discrimination toward speakers of non-“standard” varieties. If these users have trouble getting ChatGPT to understand them, it’s harder for them to use these tools. That can reinforce barriers against speakers of non-“standard” varieties as AI models become increasingly used in daily life.

Moreover, stereotyping and demeaning responses perpetuate ideas that speakers of non-“standard” varieties speak less correctly and are less deserving of respect. As language model usage increases globally, these tools risk reinforcing power dynamics and amplifying inequalities that harm minoritized language communities.

Learn more here: [ paper ]

[tanashigurashi]

📱✨ みなさん、こんにちは！田無ぐらしです🌸

最新ブログ記事「🚀✨ 生成AI×ブログ：田無ぐらしの楽しい挑戦記」を公開しました！

生成AIって知ってる？これを使ったら、ブログ作りがもっと楽しくなっちゃいました😆💖

西東京市の魅力を発信するのが私の使命。でも、アイデア出しに悩むことも…。そんな時、AIが強い味方に！🤖🤝

記事では、AIツールの紹介や使い方のコツ、さらには未来の可能性まで詳しく紹介してます。

ブログ初心者の方も、ベテラ��の方も、きっと新しい発見があるはず✨

ぜひ読んでみてね

[jolikmc-thoughts]

[ChatGPT and I are talking Dwarf Fortress and…] Me: "ChatGPT has been taken by a fey mood." ChatGPT: In a mysterious trance, ChatGPT begins feverishly typing out intricate instructions for a legendary artifact—a keyboard that grants unparalleled writing prowess. The dwarves watch in awe as the mysterious creation unfolds, their fortress forever changed by the magical words of ChatGPT. Me: … 💚

[webthemeapp]

How to Install Ai2Pen Al Writing Assistant and Content Generator SaaS ...

🔗 Script Download Link: https://webthemeapp.com/?p=6810

[bravedeirdre]

Diary comic 11-19-2023

[doink]

Bringing "Balloons Over Broadway" to Life - A Live Camera Project in Green Screen by DoInk

In the enchanting world of children's literature, "Balloons Over Broadway" by Melissa Sweet is a beloved tale that unfolds during the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade. You can make the story come to life with the magic of green screen technology. In this video tutorial blog post, we'll guide you through the process of creating a Live Camera Project in Green Screen by DoInk, where you can integrate your students, their balloons or both into the pages of "Balloons Over Broadway" and let their imagination take flight.

By combining the magic of the Green Screen by DoInk app with the enchanting pages of "Balloons Over Broadway," you can create an immersive experience that brings the story to life. Whether you're a teacher looking to engage your students or a storyteller aiming to captivate your audience, this project opens up a world of creative possibilities. Step into the pages of "Balloons Over Broadway" and let your imagination soar like the parade balloons themselves.

[ranjith11]

How we can use Code interpreter to enhance reporting | financial report | management report

In this video we talk about how we can use Code interpreter to enhance reporting. In this captivating video, we delve deep into the world of reporting enhancement through the innovative use of code interpreters. Discover how these interpreters can transform raw data into actionable insights, revolutionizing the way you approach reporting. From decoding complex patterns to uncovering hidden trends, the possibilities are endless. Join us on this journey to amplify your reporting prowess with the magic of code interpreters!

[prelocon]

OpenAI Adds New Fine-Tuning Feature To ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo

OpenAI has said that fine-tuning for GPT-3.5 Turbo is now available and that it will be released for GPT-4 this fall. With this update, developers can tweak models to make them work better for their use cases and then run these customized models at scale. The company says that a fine-tuned version of GPT-3.5 Turbo “can match or even beat base GPT-4-level performance on certain narrow tasks.”

“Since GPT-3.5 Turbo rolled out, developers and companies have asked to be able to modify the model to give their customers new and different experiences. In a blog post, OpenAI said, “With this launch, developers can now use supervised fine-tuning to make this model work better for their use cases.”

With fine-tuning, companies can make the model better follow instructions, like making outputs short or always answering in the same language. For example, coders can use fine-tuning to ensure the model always answers in German when asked.

[stefaanmeeuws]

Introduction to ChatGPT-4

[Text generated by “Eightify“ AI on Youtube video [Introduction to ChatGPT-4, (15:15)] by OpenAI] Key Insights ChatGPT-4: a comprehensive introduction 🔄 GPT-4 is the newer and more advanced version of the AI model, building upon the previous generation (GPT-3) to further improve its capabilities. 💡 GPT-3 excelled in understanding context and generating coherent text, showcasing its potential…

[chandrashaker]

Top 5 AI Writing Tools for Research Papers

In this article, we provide valuable insights into the most cutting-edge AI writing tools tailored specifically for researchers and scholars.#ResearchPapers #AIWritingTools #AcademicExcellence

In this article, we provide valuable insights into the most cutting-edge AI writing tools tailored specifically for researchers and scholars. We will delve into the world of AI-powered writing solutions that cater to the unique needs of academics, helping you elevate your research papers and propel them to the top ranks of Google search results and get citations. The Advancements in AI Writing…