Sir Pentious from Hazbin Hotel concept, please? I love snake boi so much and I know you do too lmao
Yeah... and I still do, lol. May not be as into Hazbin as I used to, but I still enjoy the snake.
Yandere! Sir Pentious Concept
Pairing: Romantic
Possible Trigger Warnings: Gender-Neutral Darling, Obsession, Stalking, Clingy behavior, Manipulation, Jealousy, Possessive behavior, Kidnapping, Violence, Murder/Accidental death mentioned, Dubious/Forced relationship.
I'm going to say it now, Pentious is a pathetic yandere.
He'd try so hard to follow through with his yandere schemes, only for something to go wrong.
The only way he'd succeed is most likely by accident.
He's often loud and easy to excite.
He's persistent yet also seems shy when it comes to romance or anything intimate.
We can see this in the show with Cherri.
He'd definitely want to be the center of his obsession's attention.
He'd do anything for you to acknowledge him.
An example is him making inventions to impress you.
He follows you around eagerly but sometimes would be too anxious to talk to you properly.
He wants his obsession to think he's cool and probably gets emotionally attached to them easily.
It's also canon Sir Pentious watches people sleep, apparently.
So... He's definitely going to slither beside your bed when you're asleep and just stare.
I can just see Sir Pentious planning things but... his plans never go the way he wants them to.
Like, I can see Pentious killing another sinner by accident... but failing anything purposeful.
Who knows, maybe that accident actually works in his favor.
Same thing with kidnapping.
He'd set up this elaborate plan to lure you into a trap.
Only for it to fail.
For the most part he's just clingy with you.
He respects you, looks up to you, finds you pretty to look at...
Yet can't approach you for the life of him.
When he does converse with you... He's so awkward.
He really is trying to connect but he gets so flustered.
If Pentious succeeded in making you his, it's probably out of pity or complete accident.
In fact, there's a chance he could win you over without you even seeing his yandere behavior.
He's adorable in a way... even if he's failing being bad.
He's a good inventor and has a weak form of hypnosis, but it's nowhere close to someone like Vox.
The most you're affected by it is being stunned like Angel was.
Pentious' biggest issue is being clingy.
I imagine he's a fan of physical affection from his obsession.
Considering he's a snake... Hugs are quite literally constricting.
So I think even if you were good friends or close, if he didn't want you to leave, he'd probably constrict you then not move.
Again, considering he's a snake, you could probably incorporate his bite into his behavior.
Sir Pentious has the tools to be a dangerous yandere towards his obsession...
But not the mindset.
Pentious could, if he really tried, kidnap you properly.
He could constrict you, maybe bite you, then probably keep you in his ship.
However... He usually stays away from such an idea.
He wants to try "wooing" you properly first.
What a gentleman....
Sir Pentious most likely experiences jealousy, but he's really petty.
He knows he hates not being the center of your attention and he acts a bit childish about it.
It's like a competition to him... Even if you're simply chatting with someone else.
Sir Pentious would quickly want to grab your attention, even if he's usually admiring you from afar.
"H-Hey! Hey, wait! I-I made this cool invention I want to show you! Also, Charlie showed me this new exercise! Can we hang out...?"
He's so shy and awkward when it comes to relationships, it's hard to see his true nature towards you.
He acts cute and his plans mostly don't work...
However, there's most likely always the threat he may succeed at some point if pushed.
Sure, his failed attempts at courtship are cute now...
Until he succeeds.
While I still can't see him as killing someone on purpose due to jealousy (Without getting completely ruined by the other person)...
Kidnapping is plausible.
You trust Sir Pentious, so he could probably lure you away and bite you if he wanted.
Normally he just wants to try flirting or attempts at affection.
You don't suspect a thing until his fangs slip into your neck.
Even then he's mumbling out quick apologies as he scoops you up.
He definitely keeps you in his ship and tries to play things off.
Oh! This was all just a little... surprise he put together, yeah!
Said surprise is a room full of things dedicated to you and a bed in the middle of it for you to sit on.
He really didn't want to kidnap you the more he got to know you...
Yet he was so tired of being ignored.
Sir Pentious only wanted you to look his way.
However... It appears the only way he can have you is through restraints.
He just wishes you could be only his.
While Sir Pentious can also be a yandere you can have a (mostly) normal relationship with...
With a bit of motivation, like an obsession choosing to ignore his feelings or is with someone else, may make him snap enough to become dangerous despite his submissive nature.
He can try manipulating you away and trying to grasp your attention...
Yet sometimes it isn't enough...
Leading to you being locked away for his own eyes only.
Even in captivity, Sir Pentious tries to make your "relationship" seem normal.
He showers you in gifts he made, he smothers you in affection...
The snake really enjoys cuddles.
Sir Pentious loves to slither beside you as you sleep, nuzzling into your neck.
He's a pathetic yandere, one someone may consider charming...
But he's still a cunning snake...
He's still a potential danger to you, and all it takes is one bite to make him switch.
36 notes
·
View notes
Updated OMITB S4 Killer Theory
After watching this week's episode I have a new theory for who killed Sazz. There are some plot holes proving otherwise but for now this is what is sticking with me the most. I think it also ties some of these storylines together. I'm putting this all under a spoiler tag just in case since it hasn't been a full day yet.
I think Bev is actually Dudenoff. From what we know so far, Dudenoff is rarely ever home and is currently in Portugal. Bev living and working in Los Angeles means that she could go back and forth collecting rent, hire someone to do so, or just have it deposited directly. Maybe she inherited one of the apartments, saw an opportunity for the others and took it. Plus it's a nice side hustle that can help to fund her film projects.
The mysterious person in the group with their face scratched out could very well be Helga. Vince said that Helga was the wrong type of weirdo and Rudy, Inez, and Ana were all trying to paint her as mentally ill and paranoid. I think we can assume she's not dead since we heard her on the radio, but she is clearly in hiding meaning she didn't leave the West Tower on her own accord. I think she uncovered a secret about Dudenoff or whatever other crime these Westies are into and was going to tell Charles so he could expose it on the podcast.
Sazz was digging around searching for clues before she was killed, even going so far as to discover that someone was watching Charles and gaining access to the code for the Dudenoff apartment. This season has been playing around a lot with the concept of stunt doubles, twins, and actors portraying actors. What if Sazz bore a strong resemblance to Helga and was successfully able to pass as her which is how she got entry to the Dudenoff apartment? If the theory that Helga was going to snitch is correct, maybe during the night of the party one of the Westies looked out the window, saw Sazz in Charles' apartment and thought she was Helga and killed her to keep her from telling?
If Bev is Dudenoff there is a possibility that she was in attendance at the party at the end of season 3 and was also in town to collect the rent owed by the Westies. Maybe at the party she saw Sazz and because of the Sazz/Helga lookalike theory thought Helga was in disguise to get close to Charles. Having her side hustle exposed would lose her money and with how she hounded the trio to sign over their movie rights she sounds like she's struggling financially. In episode 4, the actors are referred to as faces because there's a dynamic where stunt people don't get recognition for their work and aren't recognized outside of the work that they do. At the party when they discuss the wine Charles has upstairs, Bev could have overheard that Sazz was going up to get it and saw that as her chance to strike. As Dudenoff it would be easy to run over to the apartment she owns and gain access to get the job done. Plus we now know she knows how to handle a gun after she is seen holding the trio at gunpoint at the end of the episode.
The question remains whether Sazz was the intended victim or Charles and I'm still going to go with Sazz for now. I know there's the whole "Everybody hates Charles" agenda but he's basically a homebody so I doubt there would be enough interactions over time for someone to actually hate him. The only other reason is that a family member of one of the victims in the podcast or the killers is mad at him for profiting off of their death like what the bartender said at Concussions.
So this is where I'm at right now theory wise. There is still plenty of time to change that because we have 6 episodes left. I know there's so much more to be discovered so I can't wait to see what direction the show will take over the next few episodes.
20 notes
·
View notes
So if all Hezbollah members, including civilians that never saw combat (and people who owned a pager but weren't members of Hezbollah), can be classified as terrorists and any innocent child that gets killed when you attack those members are at fault for being in "such close proximity to terrorists to get hurt" even though those bombs were activated when the members were just just doing normal daily task in public such as grocery shopping then can we apply this logic to the IOF?
Can we blame all non-combatant soldiers for the massacres done by other soldiers and can we target those soldiers when they're off-duty in shops, schools, hospitals and if an Israeli child got killed or injured then its their fault for being "in close proximity to terrorists" or does that logic not work because only Christians and Muslims can be terrorists?
Also calling people being disgusted by you for making jokes about this terrorist attack "hatemail" and a "Jews are baby killers" thing (when you're literally laughing and justifying killing children) is laughably pitiful, you get 1/10 for self-victimization.
Plz try harder to not shame your colony of self-victimizers, you can't let those dead children steal the attention from you.
bitch you know what Hezbollah is, right? you understand the concept of terrorist organisations, right? fym "civilian hezbollah members"??
also lmao IOF I see who I'm talking to here
the fact that you're literally projecting how the antizionist movement treats current and former IDF soldiers and using our own arguments against us, it's just hilarious to me. the IDF is an actual military force with branches and roles of people that will never have to hold a gun in their lives except for the mandatory first 5 week training period. my friend reached military age and she's literally about to go serve in a dog shelter, a regular fucking dog shelter, like a volunteer job but getting paid by the government for it.
again, I'm not talking to someone about "think of the innocent children who died from an attack that hit 99% terrorists" from a person who didn't confirm if they cared about civilian israeli lives. over 100k people displaced, >1400 people murdered and raped horrifically, or are we not human enough in your eyes to deserve compassion?
any civilian being harmed is horrible, but you literally can't make an attack on that scale while guaranteeing 0 collateral damage, I did not personally make jokes on that situation, only shared ones I found on reddit, and I would not cheer if the attack did significant collateral damage, and from reports it seems that other people got hurt only in extremely specific situations. you'd fucking cheer if it was done to the "IOF" even if it harmed more kids than soldiers, so don't give me a fucking lecture over my morals, there's a block button at the top right.
these type of jokes are so out of character for me anyways, this is not something I usually joke about, but I had a horrific day yesterday and yknow what I think it's funny to think about how terrorists lost their balls from pagers. the VAST MAJORITY of people sustained minor injuries from that attack, the vast majority of the terrorists who carried their pagers barely even got harmed, this is really the hill you wanna die on? that an attack that barely grazed people is evil because of circumstances outside the attackers' control?
19 notes
·
View notes
Hi, idk really why I want to ask you this but sometimes I just feel so insecure about the fact I’m still a virgin at 23. I haven’t even kissed someone. I’ve always been so insecure about my looks that I’ve never wanted to get intimate with someone, and i know I’m not ugly but I just feel like now the fact I have never had anything makes me feel repulsive. I’ve been on dates but I’ve just never felt that interested in them? I like my alone time too and I feel like I can’t be bothered trying to force a relationship when I want to work on myself. I’m going travelling in 6 months for a year and I doubt I’ll meet someone when I’m travelling so I’ll be 25 almost when I come back and still a virgin. Is that bad? I know I should take things at my pace but I just feel like there must be something wrong with me if I don’t really want to with anyone I’ve met who’s been into me? What should I do?
I got wordy here so a read more was necessary ↓
Hi hon. I say this anytime someone asks me about having not met some milestone yet - but you still being a virgin at 23 really doesn't define you at all and it's not weird. I bet I could post a poll right now and ask who's still a virgin past the age of 23 and you'd see a lot more virgins than not. In fact, I just had a recent anon who is also 23 and a virgin (pretty sure I posted this ask yesterday - check the #ask tag on my blog if you'd like) so you're not alone. Not even close.
Milestones, especially something like when you should lose your virginity, should all be done away with. There's no timeline for something like that. And I'm sure you've heard it before but you definitely want to enjoy your first time having sex and do it with someone you trust and not force yourself to get it over with. While I think virginity is mostly just a social construct, it can be a big deal to us as individuals.
You aren't repulsive, there's nothing wrong with you, and you get to decide when and with whom you do have sex with. No one but you. I actually think you sound like you have a good head on your shoulders. You've gone on dates and have made the mature decision that you weren't that into the people you dated, you know you're someone who enjoys your alone time (me too hon), you already know better than to force a relationship (some people don't get this concept bc they're scared to be alone and by the time they realize what they've done it's too late), and you're about to go on a year-long travel which is huge and there would be so many people your age terrified to travel for a year. You're brave, adventurous, and smart.
I think you're way more amazing than you realize, just from this ask I can pick up how mature and emotionally intelligent you are. Don't compromise. You're doing absolutely amazing. And also don't discount yourself that you're not going to perhaps meet someone on your travels. Who knows what will happen? Maybe you'll still be a virgin after the year is up - but that's perfectly okay too. Be open to what could happen and keep doing what you're doing.
Also, it's going to benefit you to not talk badly about yourself. Start telling yourself how impressive and how unique you are. Do away with saying such negative things. Seriously. No more of that that! You're going to be just fine. Remember that you're still young, you're smart, and you're about to do something that most people in this world cannot say they've ever done, nor would they be brave enough to (enjoy wherever your travels take you!).
xoxo
17 notes
·
View notes