#best ai essay writer

[tanya31000]

Top 10 AI Essay Collaborators To Spark New Ideas

In the digital age, technology has become an indispensable tool in various aspects of our lives, including the realm of academia. One area where technology has made significant strides is in AI essay writer. With the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI), essay writing has undergone a transformation, enabling collaboration between human writers and AI systems to generate new ideas and enhance the writing process. In this article, we will explore the top 10 AI essay collaborators that can help spark new ideas and revolutionize the way we approach writing.

Importance of AI in Essay Writing

AI has revolutionized numerous industries, and essay writing is no exception. Gone are the days when writers had to rely solely on their own knowledge and creativity to craft compelling essays. AI-powered tools now offer invaluable assistance in various aspects of the writing process, from generating ideas to refining grammar and style. The use of AI in essay writing not only enhances efficiency but also opens up new avenues for creativity and innovation.

Criteria for Selecting AI Essay Collaborators

Before delving into the top 10 AI essay collaborators, it's essential to establish the criteria for selecting these tools. When choosing an AI essay collaborator, factors such as accuracy of information, language proficiency, collaboration features, and user experience should be taken into consideration. Additionally, compatibility with different writing styles and the availability of customization options are important factors to consider.

Top 10 AI Essay Collaborators

1.Simplified: Simplified offers advanced grammar checking, plagiarism detection, and idea generation tools. It has a user-friendly interface and helps improve writing quality.

● Features: Simplified offers advanced grammar checking, plagiarism detection, and idea generation tools. Its intuitive interface makes it easy to use for writers of all skill levels.

● Pros: User-friendly interface, accurate suggestions, idea generation assistance.

● Cons: Limited customization options, may require internet connection for full functionality.

● Benefits: Improves writing quality, enhances productivity, sparks new ideas.

● Pricing: Freemium model with basic features available for free and premium plans starting at $9.99/month.

2. HiveMind: HiveMind provides collaborative writing tools, real-time feedback, and advanced research assistance. It's great for teamwork and streamlining group projects.

● Features: HiveMind provides collaborative writing tools, real-time feedback, and advanced research assistance.

● Pros: Facilitates teamwork, enhances collaboration, comprehensive research support.

● Cons: Learning curve for new users, occasional glitches in collaboration features.

● Benefits: Streamlines group projects, fosters creativity, accelerates research process.

● Pricing: Free with limited features, premium plans available starting at $14.99/month.

3. Paraphrasingtool.ai: Paraphrasingtool.ai specializes in paraphrasing and rephrasing content to improve readability and originality. It helps avoid plagiarism and enhances writing flow.

● Features: Paraphrasingtool.ai specializes in paraphrasing and rephrasing content to improve readability and originality.

● Pros: Simplifies complex sentences, enhances clarity, preserves meaning.

● Cons: Limited functionality beyond paraphrasing, may not handle technical or specialized content well.

● Benefits: Helps avoid plagiarism, improves writing flow, saves time.

Pricing: Free to use with basic features, premium plans starting at $4.99/month.

4. Byword: Byword offers a distraction-free writing environment, Markdown support, and seamless syncing across devices. It's perfect for writers who want to minimize distractions and focus on writing.

● Features: Byword offers distraction-free writing environment, Markdown support, and seamless syncing across devices.

● Pros: Clean interface, Markdown support, syncs with iCloud and Dropbox.

● Cons: Limited advanced editing features, lacks collaboration tools.

● Benefits: Minimizes distractions, enhances focus, supports writing on-the-go.

● Pricing: One-time purchase for $14.99 on macOS, $5.99 on iOS.

5. Quillbot: Quillbot employs AI algorithms for sentence rewriting, paraphrasing, and grammar correction. It improves writing clarity and aids in paraphrasing.

● Features: Quillbot employs AI algorithms for sentence rewriting, paraphrasing, and grammar correction.

● Pros: Generates alternative sentences, improves readability, suggests synonyms.

● Cons: May produce awkward phrasing, occasional inaccuracies in suggestions.

● Benefits: Enhances writing clarity, aids in paraphrasing, saves time on editing.

● Pricing: Free with basic features, premium plans starting at $15/month.

6. Rapide.ly: Rapide.ly offers AI-powered content generation, topic suggestions, and SEO optimization tools. It's useful for generating content ideas and improving SEO.

● Features: Rapide.ly offers AI-powered content generation, topic suggestions, and SEO optimization tools.

● Pros: Generates content ideas, optimizes for search engines, supports content planning.

● Cons: Limited customization options, may require manual refinement of generated content.

● Benefits: Sparks new ideas, improves SEO, speeds up content creation process.

● Pricing: Free trial available, premium plans starting at $29/month.

7. Hubspot: Hubspot provides AI-powered content creation, marketing automation, and lead generation tools. It streamlines marketing efforts and improves content ROI.

● Features: Hubspot provides AI-powered content creation, marketing automation, and lead generation tools.

● Pros: Integrates with marketing platforms, offers comprehensive analytics, supports lead nurturing.

● Cons: Complex interface, steep learning curve for beginners, may be overwhelming for smaller teams.

● Benefits: Streamlines marketing efforts, boosts lead generation, improves content ROI.

● Pricing: Free CRM with limited features, premium plans starting at $45/month.

8. Sudowrite: Sudowrite offers AI-driven writing assistance, creative prompts, and collaborative editing tools. It stimulates creativity and enhances collaboration among writers.

● Features: Sudowrite offers AI-driven writing assistance, creative prompts, and collaborative editing tools.

● Pros: Generates creative prompts, assists in brainstorming, supports collaborative writing.

● Cons: Limited database of prompts, occasional inaccuracies in suggestions.

● Benefits: Stimulates creativity, enhances collaboration, speeds up writing process.

● Pricing: Free with basic features, premium plans starting at $19/month.

9. Scalenut: Scalenut provides AI-powered content optimization, topic generation, and social media scheduling tools. It boosts content performance and enhances social media presence.

● Features: Scalenut provides AI-powered content optimization, topic generation, and social media scheduling tools.

● Pros: Optimizes content for engagement, suggests trending topics, streamlines social media management.

● Cons: Limited customization options, may not integrate with all social media platforms.

● Benefits: Boosts content performance, saves time on research, enhances social media presence.

● Pricing: Free trial available, premium plans starting at $39/month.

10. Copysmith: Copysmith utilizes AI for content generation, copywriting, and marketing copy optimization. It speeds up content creation and improves marketing effectiveness.

● Features: Copysmith utilizes AI for content generation, copywriting, and marketing copy optimization.

● Pros: Generates high-quality content, aids in copywriting tasks, optimizes for conversions.

● Cons: Limited scope beyond copywriting, may require manual refinement for specific industries.

● Benefits: Speeds up content creation, improves marketing effectiveness, saves on hiring costs.

● Pricing: Free trial available, premium plans starting at $29/month.

How AI Essay Collaborators Spark New Ideas

The collaboration between human writers and AI essay collaborators has the potential to spark new ideas in several ways. Firstly, AI-powered tools offer diverse perspectives and insights that may not have been considered by human writers alone. Additionally, AI algorithms can rapidly generate ideas based on vast amounts of data, helping writers overcome creative blocks and explore new avenues of thought. Collaboration features such as real-time feedback and editing further enhance the brainstorming process, enabling writers to refine their ideas collaboratively.

Tips for Effective Utilization of AI Essay Collaborators

While AI essay collaborators offer invaluable assistance in the writing process, it's essential to use them effectively to maximize their benefits. Understanding the strengths and limitations of AI is crucial, as it allows writers to leverage AI suggestions while incorporating their own creativity and judgment. Additionally, effectively utilizing collaboration features and continuously learning and improving with AI tools are key to enhancing writing productivity and quality.

Conclusion

AI essay collaborators have revolutionized the writing process by offering invaluable assistance in generating ideas and enhancing writing quality. The top 10 AI essay collaborators highlighted in this article provide a wide range of features and capabilities to suit the needs of writers across different disciplines and skill levels. By effectively utilizing these tools and embracing collaboration between human writers and AI systems, writers can unlock new levels of creativity and innovation in their writing endeavors. As technology continues to evolve, the future prospects of AI in essay writing are promising, offering exciting opportunities for essay generator to explore new frontiers of creativity and expression.

Try Simplified AI Essay Writer To Boost Your Writing Now

[johncarter54]

How to bypass Turnitin AI detection? How to write an essay faster? Check out free AI paraphrasing tool for students - https://netus.ai/

[monsterfactoryfanfic]

I did actually have a decent video essay output this year. Aside from The Most Important Essay (which is the best piece anyone has ever written), here are what I think are my best videos in 2024, in no order:

Spy in the House of Eth and Automating Exploitation- Zedeck Siew's always been a phenomenal writer, but I'm proud of my read of the module's undead automata and how I compared it to "AI as Necromancy." I feel moderately less hopeless about AI now than when I wrote it, but it's still very relevant

The History Behind "They Took Our War" and "Before the Boats- Kevin Nguyen's solo games on the traumas of the Vietnam War prompted me to do a deeper dive into the rage behind his words. If you're a US citizen, you likely never learned how horrible all aspects of the war really were.

The Hidden Lore of Wanderhome- I don't think this video is especially smart--it's mostly speculation about what's implied by the text. But I would love for more folks to be doing this kind of fan work for RPGs. Indie designers have so many secrets in their games, and I want us to be as excited for them as people are for Elden Ring lore videos

Dialect RPG and A Memory Called Empire- Death by Assimilation I truly think no one else is doing literary analysis of RPGs like me, and this is a short and sweet example of how intertextual reads can bring out a game's themes. Also plz read Rascal's story on the Iranian D&D scene

Jumping the Track: Death of the Author, Metalepsis, and Hadestown- Again, solid comparative piece talking about the thematic goals and similarities by two different designers, framed around Hadestown's use of the railway as stand in for inevitability. And who doesn't like a musical?

---

I think I've had a mixed output this year. More misses than hits. But I'm still proud of whatever niche I occupy in the hobby, and I hope my work shows people how incredible the indie RPG scene is.

[tanadrin]

The most frustrating thing I saw in the "AI debate" (ugh) is where Ted Chiang apparently wrote in a New Yorker essay, "yeah, I could imagine there being some usefulness or merit to LLM use if you did it as one tool among many as part of an iterative creative process," and someone on Twitter was like "people literally do this all the time, including in writing," and their tweet got a bunch of replies along the lines of "those people aren't writers lol," who pointed to Chiang's essay as an argument. Like I dunno man, it sure doesn't feel like there's actually a principled argument here. LLMs just have the wrong Vibes, and since nobody actually knows anything about the jurisprudence of copyright and there's not actually a single consistent and concrete definition of plagiarism[1], people feel free to argue about it until the cows come home.

[1] don't @ me being like "lol everybody knows what plagiarism is." i have seen what constitutes academic misconduct on grounds of plagiarism vary widely between different fields of scholarship based on accepted citation practices; people have huge fights about what should or should not constitute fair use; the music industry is notorious for impossible-to-adjudicate court cases based on short fragments of a melody here and there happening to resemble one another. plagiarism, like all conceptual categories, has some clear central examples and a huge penumbra of fuzzy examples that are often highly contextual, if they can even be agreed on at all. the desire to treat plagiarism as black and white to shore up one side of an argument or another is at best shortsighted and at worst outright dishonest.

[ventique18]

- Not twst, sort of rant -

Notice how the ones on twitter shouting that human translators/localizers should just be entirely replaced by AI don't know a lick of Japanese. Putting aside the obvious domino disaster that would happen to everyone if we let AI take over a career, Japanese is extremely different from English, to the point that making a stellar translation the likes of Ace Attorney requires that you be an even more stellar writer. Those who think translators don't deserve their pay are clearly too dumb to learn another language and too dumb to learn how to write above Elementary School level essays.

It's true that there are a few bad apples here and there who make questionable translation choices. But majority of those few did not even make the decision to publish that themselves; companies can and will censor and alter messages that they think will affect their image. That's why sometimes fan translations feel better than official ones. Fans just don't have the same level of restriction that official translators do. No translator worth their salt would willingly publish something that will ruin their reputation, especially if they're N1 certified (the highest level) and took years or decades to master the craft.

"But context gets lost when human translators do it--" And even more context will get lost if AI does it. I've watched my fair share of anime that are obviously AI translated and they're so bad you wouldn't even understand why it looks like everyone just heard a joke when you couldn't find where the punchline was. That rewatching it side by side with another publisher's human translation perfectly showcases the sheer difference between shitty writing of AI and someone who possibly earned a Master's or PHD. Example: AI translation of Shikanoko anime ep 1: "Don't tell me, you're a lady?" Actual translation: "So you're saying you're really a virgin?"

This out of control hatred for translators is just pure spite and petty envy, is all. I'll admit that I'm not the best in Japanese, but even with my intermediate skills I know exactly how hard the language is and how much time and effort it takes to even be remotely good at it.

[novella-november]

Oh, and a friendly reminder that not only is Novella November *not* limited to "prose only" like other challenges (aka, you can write original fiction, fanfiction, a cookbook, an essay, a dissertation, etc) ,

you can also set your own word goals, instead of being bound to 30k!

Want to do more than 30k? Go for it!

Need to do less than 30k, either because your story is not that long, or you just feel too much pressure with 1k a day? Please feel free to set a lower word goal, and do what works best for your schedule and abilities!

The ultimate goal with Novella November is not to "write a perfect 30k novella thats ready to be published immediately" like some pro-ai contests have mutated into over the years ,

the *real* goal of Novella November is to *get something done* that you've been putting off forever, its to develop the habit of writing a little bit every day, its finally having the motivation to write down the idea that's been bouncing around your head forever, it's to join and create a community of fellow writers, and its, ultimately, to

*have fun and make friends while doing so*.

[writeouswriter]

pls no anti ai art demagogy on my dash, thx

(X) in reference to this reblog I assume.

This is the wildest ask I’ve ever gotten.

“Please no love for the humanity of creation on my dash, please. Please no acknowledgement that art and the human experience behind those making it is inherently and fundamentally intertwined. Please no shoving the fact in my face that art is meant to connect rather than consume.

And please no pointing out the basic truth that most AI engines are built off the stolen work of others.”

Demagogy, noun: political activity or practices that seek support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument.

You come into MY house, you tell me what not to reblog on MY blog, and you what? Call me “irrational” and insult my understanding of the topic in the process?

Political activity, political activity... fuck off. Actors, writers, artists, those most affected by this ARE the ordinary people, and their concerns and fears surrounding this are perfectly rational.

And you know, nothing hits it home more for me than when I thought about my favourite show at the moment, the one that makes me lose my mind a thousand times over, I thought about everything in it that makes me tick, thought about both strong points and weak points, because it is flawed, god, is it flawed because people inherently are, and that’s the beauty, but mostly, I thought about the sheer amount of care/thought and depth put into it in a way I've never really seen before and in a medium/genre/whatever you'd absolutely never expect to find that thought put into, especially if taken completely at a surface level. Thought about the levels of metaphor and symbolism layered in beneath the silliness, thought about the callbacks and clever timing, thought about the behind the scenes arguments about what direction worked best for the narrative and the audience, arguments that took place because of how much they cared not just about telling a good story, but about telling one that really means something to them.

Thought about the love, the time, the excitement and the flair and personality and background and intent of each and every person behind the team bleeding its way into the scripts, into the acting, into the heart of what makes it truly what it is, and how that love bleeds into the audience as well, how that love and human connection is what prompts people to write full page essays and analyses on it, draw fanart for it, create the most beautiful fics for it, that love is what prompts them to laugh and cry and vibrate at the speed of sound thinking about it, and what prompts thousands upon thousands to come together in their appreciation for and relation to it, rallying around it like a group of cavemen around a campfire when they had never before seen the flame.

And then.... then I thought about the idea of that same show being written by an AI and genuinely felt physically ill. Because no real care will have been put into that beyond "If it looks like a TV show, sounds like a TV show, it must be a TV show." And on the surface, maybe it’d look fine, I’m sure some people wouldn’t notice. But it’d not only be made without thought, but consumed without thought. And, sure, maybe that'll fill you up in the short term, but it's gonna leave you feeling hollow and sick eventually. Because stories are not a thing to be mass produced with a random assortment of the cheapest quality materials on a conveyor belt that shovels them directly into people's throats at the most efficient speed possible, stories are not a thing meant to just be consumed! They are a thing made with intent in every aspect, even when accidental because our lives shape it subconsciously, they are a thing made with love, a thing to be savoured! And yes, for that to happen, they will take a lot of time and hard work and dedication, all of which deserve fair compensation and respect, all of which cannot just be replaced by a sham amalgamation of these things, and they will be all the better for it.

And on some level, corporations know this, and they want you to blame their shortcomings on the writers, on the artists, they want you to look at things like the strikes and those rallying against AI and get mad that they’re keeping art from the common people, or forcing them to come to this, or they want you to think they’re simply trying to make art more accessible, all the while building their conveyor belts in the background with the blood of those they’re kicking down, taking away jobs and shoving the humanity out of the picture.

Art is made to communicate, and sometimes it’s frustrating when we can’t get that communication across, when the image we want to convey is out of our skill level, our capability, when our words get tangled up, jumbled together and we need a helping hand to find the right ones again, and on this level, maybe AI could be a useful supplemental tool, or a fun little thing to mess around with, if ethically sourced, if used for good, if taking into account and graciously acknowledging exactly how it’s being used as a tool, rather than trying to pass it off as something it’s not.

But is it political, is it irrational, to merely state that the human condition cannot be replaced?

——

The unfollow button is free, I don’t work for you.

[olderthannetfic]

Ok, wow, this is NOT the type of ask you seem to get usually, but this appears to be my best option...

I'm seeking out a post that is not particularly fandom-y in nature, but I was reminded of it after reading the earlier anon who was burned out from AI discourse - I totally feel the same way, and there was a really great lengthy textpost I reblogged a few months ago (read: "I read it any time from, like, April 2024 to almost a year ago......sorry") that I cannot find on my blog nor on tumblr in general - either because the post has been completely nuked from the internet OR because I'm just bad at SEO searches and remembering the keywords that were actually IN the post. I'm hoping it's a me issue or, if the post IS nuked, at the very least someone here remembers it and has an internet archive link or screenshot or something????

to get to the point, there was a post that was like (paraphrased, quote marks are not literal quotes):

"When it comes to the anti-AI crowd on tumblr, there's basically two schools of thought: people who completely hate AI and everything about it and are opposed to all forms of AI without even learning what AI really is. These people are stuck in their ways and generally can't be reasoned with.

Then there's a second group who are against AI for pretty good reasons - they really are worried that AI is gonna completely take over and steal artists' livelihoods, those who criticize it for environmental activist reasons, etc. These people generally can be reasoned with as they're truly misinformed, and in fact they would be - or already are - receptive to a less harmful AI."

The post then went on to compare AI to other forms of automation and made some really great parallels; such as bringing up the fact that stores that have both self checkout AND cashiers tend to be the best business models, because people who have their preferences can choose how they want to shop, AND we can utilize automated checkouts without completely getting rid of cashiers, which is obviously good for a lot of reasons.

It also debunked a lot of common fearmonger-y arguments against AI, i.e. explaining what "training AI" really entails, with some general copyright-critical philosophy in general. (I don't know the actual, like, political term, if one even exists, but basically they were talking about flaws with "intellectual property" as a concept - or at least how IP works today and why it works the way it does.)

There was also a really good addition to the OP's thoughts that I liked, with another user talking about: Essentially people who are gonna use AI would likely have done something else sketchy anyway, even if AI as it stands today didn't exist. For example, chatGPT isn't to blame for plagiarism. The people who use chatGPT to do their homework would, in an earlier time, likely go on Chegg / pay someone to write an essay / reuse their old work / etc. Likewise, the people who tell open AI to make artwork for them likely wouldn't make (or try to make) their own artwork anyway, nor would they even commission someone. They talked about how since fandom is so damn divided on the topic of AI, that the artists who DO feel as if their commissions are being taken away from them, or the writers who DO fear AI taking over fanfic.......well, to put it nicely, those people likely wouldn't really be losing many fans in the first place. You didn't lose a commission to AI - that person never would've commissioned you in the first place, and the people that do commission you hate AI as much as you do. You're not losing readers to AI - people who choose AI fics over yours are likely already the impatient type who can't handle waiting more than a week for an update, so they just make AI feed them 10k in one sitting! And the people who DO comment and read on your stuff, also hate AI!

I definitely did not agree with every single point made on the post (ie i dont think the self checkout metaphor was a great direct parallel logistically, but I def picked up what they were trying to put out and overall agreed with the general sentiment), overall it made a lot of really, really, really good points about the AI debate that I'd truly never considered before.

I know I've damn near rewritten the whole post myself now at this point but I also know there's a lot of stuff that I'm missing or that I just can't word and I'd love to know if anyone else has seen this post or has it on their blog in some capacity.

--

[stylesispunk]

My fave 2024 things (my work)

(yes, i love you, jo march)

thank you to the lovely @greenwitchfromthewoods for giving me the strength to do this

Okay. Where do I start? I've always been so insecure when it comes to the things I do for passion, love or hobby. I've always felt i'm not good enough or that I will never reach the levels of greatness I would love to taste.

Since I was a little kid I was in love with art in all its expressions. My first love in life was theater. I spent my whole childhood acting on plays and stuff that made me happy (actually my favorite memory of life has to do with a particular one) I remember my teacher and I loved how she made me love expressing things through art and I learnt drawing and painting, I was so good at that and I still do it but not with the same frequency and what can I say about stories? Writing was my refuge every time i didn't know what to say. I always tried to write plays and poems, but then came the first enemy, puberty hit and I became insecure about everything because I wasn't good in maths and people say that i wouldn't be anyone in the world because of that.

Still I kept finding ways to express myself through essays and articles and I always felt proud of myself because I got perfect grades doing that stuff. I loved how passionate I became about politics and history and about learning english. I wanted to be a journalist so bad but for some reason I couldn't persuade that dream (but i'm trying).

And narrating stories is still a foreign field for me because It's not the type of writing I tend to do but i've been trying my best to improve and practice and i feel a bit proud for taking my time in this. Writing is actually my weakest skill in English ( I got 6.5 on that skill when i took the ielts test) but those are things you shouldn't know

Well now. Thank you to all who have taken their time to read my stories and for being so nice and attentive to it. For every feedback and word that reminds me of how beautiful it is to connect with people. Sometimes i don't even know how to handle it. ♥️💌 ps, sorry if my english looks like ai for you 😶‍🌫️.

-> my favorite jobs from this year 💌

✨ Joel miller

You're the loss of my life: This one? My biggest baby. I love how I was able to put the feelings on here. The idea came from me listening to loml by taylor swift (my personal friend) on loop. I just felt like it was so easy to involve myself in this story and write two characters that lose themselves in a world they weren't ready to face and how we tend to keep loving people that hurt us because memories made us think of them as good.

Did the love affair maim you too?: same thing, love is so weird sometimes. I'm a person who took her time to open up to someone because i've been hurt in the past by this one made me feel things while writing it.

Never leave, never mind: I know it's not the same but losing my granpa was the most painful thing for me and this one helped me a lot to accept that he won't come back but I have 24 years of my life with him and that's beautiful. ( I lost the link this one 💀)

✨ Marcus Acacius:

Hands in the hair of someone's name marcus: I feel really proud of this one because I feel the writing felt so genuine for me while I was working on it, no doubt, only inspo and a lot of help from the internet to have some facts right. Besides my love for the Roman empire came back.

i don't know who to tag here because i'm shy but I am always trying to show support to writers on here. Your stories are amazing and worth each minute a person can spend reading them.

I hope to see a lot of you on here and keep writing because you're talented people who deserve all the love and respect ♥️♥️

YOU ARE AMAZING I HOPE TO SEE YOU ALL ON MY TL DURING 2025 ✨

[goodluckclove]

A Meandering Ramble on AI Art Because I Have a Cold and I'm here to Hopefully Not Start an Argument.

Okay, so I had someone comment on some post I made about writing advice that causes shame, and they decided to add the clarification that my words didn't apply to people who use AI in their writing. I responded, mainly saying that I saw their point, but that I'd say shaming someone who uses AI in any fashion is far more likely to just get that person to double down. They seemed annoyed by me saying this for a variety of reasons. I blocked them because if someone says "it's not my job to educate" it's rarely an earned perspective and it only reminds me how it's not my job to have a conversation with them.

It is my job to make too-long essays about things to help me process thoughts in a way other people might find interesting. So for your consideration I have a sort of wandering, cough-syrup addled Think Piece about AI art that is not pro-GenAI, but also doesn't just say fuck AI and fuck anyone who uses it because that is also wrong. I have a ton of links that I'm hoping are right, as well as a ton of outsider/folk artists, as well as a few AI artists I think are great.

Also there's a drawing of Link I did. He's nude. There's no dick but it's still very bad. He's either about to eat trash off the ground or he's screaming at a bit of hot dog.

Enjoy???

I mean I get it. I'm also easily aggravated by the type of person who is staunchly, aggressively defensive over Generative AI tools. They might be the kind to talk about the "democratization of art" and how genAI means anyone can be an artist. This line of thinking makes me very angry - not because I don't think anyone can be an artist, but because the fact that so many have been sold on needing some Big Tech start up to make that happen is infuriating. Anyone can already be an artist.

Anyone can be an artist. Anyone. Anyone can be an artist! This has been a case for a long, long time.

I get the sort of novelty of image and text generators. I'll go ahead and say what other writers might be unwilling to admit - if there was a provably ethical LLM I would absolutely love to collaborate on it for a project. The ethics of a lot of genAI is debatable - truly coasting on legal gray areas and hidden opt-out buttons - but it's enough that I'm not into it. Even without the practices of OpenAI, a company where every headline I see around it makes them sound comically sketchy. A lot of the reasons why I wouldn't collaborate with an LLM as they are now are the same things that would keep me from collaborating with another human writer (Maybe stealing, almost certainly wrong about potentially important things, loved by Elon Musk, ect.).

But I don't see myself ever using a genAI to do the entirety of any of the writing process for me - because I enjoy writing. I've been doing it for a long time now. I am objectively skilled enough that a select populous of people are willing to pay me for it on purpose, and since I find it fun and fulfilling I have yet to found a form of even minor automation that appeals to me.

But I also draw and paint, and I am far less skilled at that than I am at writing. I could certainly tweak at various Midjourney prompts to create something visually cool, but if I did that I'd be robbing myself the joy that came from trying to draw Link from Legend of Zelda from memory (he's either eating trash or lamenting his fallen lunch, I can't decide).

My wife saw this and their first note was that he "looks like the Grinch". Their second note was that his ass should be bigger. They also drew the fart cloud. Collaboration. This was the hardest I've laughed all day.

If you're a person who uses AI to help in art, or to do the entirety of image/writing/music creation - at this point you have to know the arguments against it. GenAI uses energy for each output - more for images than text, probably even more for videos. But so do tons of other things.

I did my best to research and calculate, and it seems like every 100 outputs of genAI images uses roughly .29 kWh, which is the rough equivalent of three hours of streaming video, running a Dyson vacuum cleaner for an hour, or using an average microwave for 10 minutes straight. It also uses water to cool the servers, right? A lot of water during a time of looming water scarcity across the globe. It's pretty likely that the water is being reused through a closed-loop system, meaning the 16 ounces that are spent for every 5-50 queries on ChatGPT aren't likely to go to waste. But with the exponential spike of data centers being built - some in parts of the country that require far more water to stay cool - that's still a pretty big water footprint. It does good, useful things for society and it's also used for crimes. This is true for most technology. But it seems, from what I've seen, that the parts of AI that are the most accessible to the public at large (GenAI mainly, run by a select major companies) are the ones most likely to be used for questionable purposes right around now.

But in all honesty I don't imagine a majority of people using genAI are using it for crime, or even deepfaked nudes. It's happening, but I imagine that's a loud minority. I don't even think most people using it to tout about being artists. I imagine most people just find it novel, or an accessible way to get into a craft that otherwise feels unavailable for them for whatever reason.

For a lot of people with no experience in forming any sort of creative practice, the concept of a machine that can fairly effectively mimic the styles of existing artists without their consent might come across as inconsequential. It might even get harder to find that understanding as you get deeper and deeper in the practice of genAI art - which, as far as I understand it, removes the creator entirely from developing an individual style.

When I say style in this point, I don't mean a completely original perspective free of any outside influence. I mean a combination of background, influence, and medium used that allows someone to recognize you in your work without you needing to say you made it. I know my writing is not entirely original. I can happily list what I've been influenced by. At the same time, I've heard a lot that people can tell my writing just on paper without my name attached at all. I believe there are ways to train a genAI to create an effect similar to this, but I'm also certain that it would require a technological influence that most people using the main programs out there don't have.

Because there's good AI Art. I'm not afraid to say it. There's AI art that I find super interesting and would pay money to see. Anna Ridler created a piece called "Mosaic Virus" that uses machine learning to generate a morphing video of tulips blooming that changes based on the market value of bitcoin. She created her own dataset. This rules and I love it. 1 the Road is an AI-written novel composed across a massive real-world road-trip by Ross Goodwin, a creative technologist. I won't call him a novelist - but neither would he. He did strap a surveillance camera on the car he drove, rigged it with a microphone and GPS, and put a shit ton of effort into something I will say sounds abstract and pretty rad.

The AI artists I think that don't really struggle to sell and exhibit and overall collect accolades for their work, from what I've seen, tend to be people who put a ton of effort into the structure of the AI itself. The artists who create from existing programs are limited by what that program is trained off of, unless they alter or edit their work after the fact.

And I know people who do the latter. My own view on how valid of a choice that is depends on the intent of the work, the meaning behind having the foundation be generated, and how you choose to credit it once it's done. In a lot of cases I just sort of tend to wonder why people think they need the machine to start at all.

I get it's hard to start making an individual piece. It's even harder to start making art at all, especially if you were taught to think somehow that you aren't a "naturally creative person". If that's you then I'm sorry, because that means you somehow internalized a pretty terrible lie.

We're a creative species. Just because it doesn't fit within the deeply narrow spectrum of Marketable, Blockbuster, Bestseller Creativity, doesn't mean it isn't worthwhile.

You can only draw stick figures? Great maybe you should give one of them a hat and then he'll be a Hat Guy. You can't even draw a straight line? Sick, sounds like these are going to be some Wiggly Stick Figures and at least one of them will have a hat. That rules.

You don't know what to write? What if a guy bought a new hat? What if the hat was cursed? What if the guy was Naruto? I don't know man I've taken a lot of cough syrup today and most of my suggestions are hat-based, I'm finding.

People might give you shit. They might give "constructive criticism" - a phrase I learned quickly that people online use very loosely. And that can be scary and discouraging. I'm not going to try and say you should do it anyway because it's the Ethically Right thing to do because I have seen the way some people treat newer artists and it made me so fucking grateful I didn't share really anything I did online until I was pretty settled in my own personal vibe.

But if you use genAI because you think it does something you can't otherwise do - you can do things too. And it might be worth trying sometimes, even if you never share it. You might think it's bad - but if you don't treat that like a failure of your character it doesn't feel as important.

Might I offer as example - my son, Fart Ass Trash Link?

My child. My legacy. My wife insisted that sometimes Link would go fully nude. I understand now that they were fucking with me.

[johncarter54]

Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality and othersAI detectors are not able to detect NetusAI paraphrased content! Make your life much easier with NetusAI paraphrasing tool - https://netus.ai/

[no-face-no-shame]

The worst part about ppl who support all of that AI bullshit is that at the end of the day they don't care. They don't care about artists. You can give them all of the best arguments and once they can't argue anymore, they will just shrug and go get ChatGPT to write their essay. They don't give a single fuck about the ethical part of the situation, about artists' frustration with their work being stolen and them being replaced. You can't reason with them because in the end they just don't care. Or tell you that you "can't be forever opposed to AI because this is the future."

Cool. I don't want this future. I don't want stupid, soulless machines to replace human creativity through stealing human work. I study IT directed specifically at AI, so I know how it works from the kitchen. I'm also a writer myself and I know what it takes to write a good story. A lot. AI should never be allowed to replace writers and artists.

If this is the future, then we can change it. Future is purely dependent on what we choose to do right now

[mithrilhearts]

Hi! I saw you made a post about the AI scraping on AO3….this may be kinda stupid but can you explain what this AI scraping thing is for dummies? I just want to better understand why we should lock out works :)

Hey there, Anon!!

I'm terrible at explaining most things, but I'll do my best! Sorry if this isn't...really what you're asking for, lol I'm trying, I swear.

Essentially what it is (and definitely not new), is training machines to create something that a real human being has already done - so with the fanfic scraping, they go in and "devour" the fics written to train their programs so that they can mass produce some form of content, whether it's stories, essays, scripts, you name it.

The machines learn off of the things we write. It sees how sentences are formulated, and how dialogue and tone blends together for a story/script/paper/etc. But it can also copy writing style, as each writer has them.

I personally don't want my fics, or style, to be a teacher, or flat out COPIED to something that will produce soulless, half-baked stories in the end, when a PERSON could easily enough just write something. Locking fics at least adds a step so that only registered users can see the fanfics, whereas if your fics aren't locked, yes, they're open for EVERYONE to read and see, which is great in theory, but then the scraping programs see that as fair game and use it to train their AI models.

The same thing happens with art, music, you name it, and 99% of the time, they have no consent to use [x thing someone made] to train their AI programs. It's ultimately theft, and monetized in some cases as well.

TL;DR: It uses fics to teach a machine how to make sentences (and not great ones)

Protect your works, folks ✌

[personal-ly]

I fucking hate mainstream coverage of the writer's strike. Why is everyone talking about the strike delaying shows rather than talking about the actual fucking strike??

And i cannot believe how many people think ai rn can replace writers. Like have you read that shit?? Like it's boring at best and incoherent sometimes. Chat gpt can't even write an essay without it being immediately obvious that it was written by an ai.

I have soo many thoughts about some dumbass YouTube channels too that are like the writing is bad nowadays so they'll lose their jobs anyway and the wga members don't know what they're doing blah blah blah . I'm kinda pissed off ngl

[forsssnaken]

Tips for New Fic Writers (by someone who is not qualified in the slightest)

Capitalise your titles like that (if you wish to capitalise at all, there's something to be said for entirely lowercase titles for style). Every word in a title should be capitalised EXCEPT and, an, a, but, at, as, for, by, the, on, or, in, of -- UNLESS THEY ARE THE FIRST OR LAST WORD IN A TITLE.

Please take your dialogue out of the paragraph. Let's do paragraph breaks, please.

If you don't understand grammar or English very well, seek out a Beta reader. If you don't want that, the least you can do is skim through it with grammarly (not recommended).

Don't abandon pararaphs. They're probably alright and salvageable. Just copy and paste them to the bottom of the document. Sometimes you'll find yourself in a rut, can scroll down, and there will be something to help you that you've written previously.

Practice is the best thing you could possibly do, and it's a damn good thing for my ego that I haven't posted all the fanfiction I've ever written (see: Lord of the Rings gay ships in my 3rd grade writing notebook that I had to share with the whole class). You almost have to get better if you're practicing.

The biggest 'turn offs' in writing, from a very picky person:

Blocks and blocks of text. Be liberal with your paragraph breaks, please!

Dialogue without proper quotation marks. Man is that annoying to read.

AI. Yes, it's easy to tell. I can tell if it's the whole fic or a damn paragraph. This skill comes from reading 14/15 year olds' essays for 2 years.

The wrong your/you're and there/their/they're. It's not a hard rule to learn, friends.

If you name Aziraphale something other than that (see: Azira Fell, Azi, Az, Ezra, etc.) -- this is a personal gripe.

I don't want this to scare you.

Most Important Things to Take Away: Reading others' work is the second best thing for your writing, writing is the best. Write whenever you get a free moment.

Remember: It's a hobby, not a career (given that you're reading this post) so give yourself some grace. I love you. Stay hydrated and do some carpal tunnel exercises from youtube.

[bluebellhairpin]

There's been AI covers of songs going around for ages on tiktok (ones I'm referring to in this post are covers by 'Arthur Morgan' from Red Dead 2, however there are hundreds of others, be they characters from shows or actual musical artists) and they've never sat fuckin right with me.

With the strike going on, and cooperation's saying they're going to start using AI generated actors (their body scans AND voices), these tiktoks are like a genuine problem now.

Roger Clark, then man who voiced Arthur Morgan in the video game has spoken about it now, and noted how harmful it is, saying he "doesn't get a kick out of it at all" and that it is "Plagiarism Software". These AI 'Covers' ARE Plagiarism.

If you'd like the definition of the word, Oxford Dictionary states it's "Presenting work or ideas from another source as your own, with or without consent of the original author (Or in the case of AI "original creator" = original writer, actor, artist, etc)". That means ALL your AI art, ALL your AI writing, ALL those AI character chat bots you use ALL the AI song covers, ALL of them being GENERATED by an AI WITHOUT CONCENT FROM THE ORIGINAL CREATORS are Plagiarized Works.

Now, because so many people think they can just use AI and not have to worry about the consequences (because for some reason, they think there is none), here's what can happen if you're caught using Plagiarized works; This Scribblr article states what can happen if you use plagiarized works in a university, college or high school environment, which is becoming a problem with AI generated essays, etc. (It also Included a section on why it's so serious - a section easily transferred into AI generated Fanfiction). best case scenario is that you get an automatic zero score. Worst case, expulsion. Here in Australia, according this article by Criminal Defense Lawyers Australia, under our copywrite law, the penalty for plagiarism can be up to 5 years imprisonment, and/or a 600,000 AUD fine.

There's many, many other articles one could comb though, above is only two, and while neither of them directly mention AI works, the idea IS the same. AI works are copywrite. AI works are plagiarism. AI works are dishonest, and they are ruining the creative field in an extremely brutal and heartless way. There are people here who are being stolen from - not just in creative spaces like fandom or art - but their very jobs, their livelihoods (show writers, actors, musicians).

Those using AI are being unethical, and selfish, and I know they will be stubborn too. But if you use AI you are supporting it. If you're supporting it, then you are willingly sitting and watching people die, slowly. And I'm sorry (not really), but people who are like that don't deserve to keep their toys.