#Surrogacy for Gay Parents

[surrogacyglobal]

Discover Hassle-Free Gay Surrogacy in Argentina

[eternal-echoes]

Child born through a surrogate and raised by two dads longs for a mom.

I wonder how many of these stories we will see in the future as children who grew up with gay parents become adults and write about their longing for a dad if they were raised by lesbian parents or a mom if they were raised by gay parents online since they probably feel like they can't share these feelings to their gay parents for fear of offending them.

I just hope that this girl realizes that her feelings are totally valid.

[spiderfaang]

Emery reminded me of how I need more trans hcs for wcs. Especially for cats who have children.

[surrogacyagencykenya]

What all steps Cambodia needs to take to legalize gay and single parent surrogacy?

The legalization of gay and single parent surrogacy in Cambodia could be a multifaceted issue that requires a cautious and comprehensive approach. As of now Cambodia's position on surrogacy has been to some degree unclear, with the government banning all types of surrogacy in 2016. In the following parts of this article, we will investigates the steps Cambodia may take to legalize and control surrogacy for gay and single parents, drawing on real-time cases from other nations that have effectively explored this complex issue.

1. Comprehensive legal System

The primary and most pivotal step is the improvement of a comprehensive legal system that particularly addresses surrogacy. Moreover, this system should incorporate:

Clear Definition of Surrogacy: Building up a legitimate definition of same sex surrogacy in Cambodia that incorporates both gestational and conventional types.

Rights and Duties: Clearly laying out the rights and obligations of all parties included, including the surrogate, intended parents, and the child.

Legal Parenthood: Giving arrangements for the exchange of legitimate parenthood from the surrogate to the intended parents

Real-Time Illustration: The United Kingdom’s Surrogacy Act and the consequent Parental Orders are great cases of a legal system that, in spite of requiring updates, has given a ground for surrogacy agreements and the exchange of parenthood.

2. Inclusivity in laws

Laws should expressly incorporate arrangements for gay and single parents, guaranteeing that they are not segregated against within the procedure. This includes:

Non-Discrimination Clauses: Laws must expressly state that surrogacy is available to all people in any case of their marital status or sexual preferences.

Acknowledgment of Differing Family Structures: Recognizing and regarding the differing qualities of cutting edge family structures in legal terms.

Real-Time Illustration: The United States offers a shifted landscape in terms of surrogacy laws, with a few states like California having comprehensive laws that don't discriminate based on marital status or sexual introduction.

3. Regulating Surrogacy agencies and Clinics

To guarantee ethical practices, there should be strict control and accreditation of surrogacy agency in Cambodia and fertility clinics.

Ethical Measures: Agencies and clinics must follow ethical guidelines, including straightforward cost structures and reasonable treatment of surrogates during same sex surrogacy in Cambodia.

Health and Security Controls: Guaranteeing the health and safety of the surrogate through customary medical checks and mental support via surrogacy agency in Cambodia.

Real-Time Case: In Canada, surrogacy is controlled with a focus on the health and well-being of the surrogate, including prohibiting commercial surrogacy to avoid misuse.

4. Universal Collaboration and Benchmarks

Given the Global nature of surrogacy, Cambodia may advantage from worldwide collaboration and adherence to global benchmarks. This includes:

Following to International Rules: Taking after rules set by global bodies just like the World Health Organization (WHO) on surrogacy for gay couples in Cambodia.

Proper agreements: Shaping understandings with other nations to guarantee the smooth process of citizenship and travel for children born through surrogacy.

Real-Time Illustration: Thailand, which changed its surrogacy laws in 2015, worked towards adjusting its directions with International human rights benchmarks.

5. Public Awareness and Education

Raising awareness and giving education about gay surrogacy in Cambodia is fundamental to develop understanding and acknowledgment, especially for gay and single parent surrogacy. This incorporates:

Instructive Campaigns: Advising the common people about what surrogacy involves and dispersing myths and misguided judgments.

Support for intended parents and Surrogates: Giving resources and support for those considering surrogacy.

Real-Time Illustration: In Australia, agencies play a noteworthy role in educating the public while offering support to intended parents and surrogates.

6. Ensuring the Rights of the Child

Any legal system must prioritize the rights and best interests of the child while thinking about surrogacy for gay couples in Cambodia. This incorporates:

Right to information: Guaranteeing the child’s right to know their origin.

Safety Against Trafficking and Abuse: Executing rigid measures to anticipate child trafficking and abuse.

Real-Time Case: The Hague convention on protection of Children and Co-operation in respect of inter country adoption offers guidelines that can be adjusted for international surrogacy agreements.

7. Tending to the Ethical and Social Suggestions

The government must pay attention to the ethical and social suggestions of surrogacy, guaranteeing that policies reflect societal values and moral contemplations. This includes:

Meeting with Ethicists and Social Scientists: Engaging with specialists to understand the broader affect of surrogacy on society.

Social Affectability: Being touchy to the social setting of Cambodia while defining surrogacy laws.

8. Persistent review and adaptation of Laws

Surrogacy laws ought to not be static but must evolve with changing social states of mind and medical headways. This requires:

Regular Audit of laws: Laws ought to be frequently checked on and updated to reflect current demands and technological headways.

Getting the feedback:  Setting up a mechanism to get feedback from all partners, including intended parents, surrogates, and medical experts.

Conclusion

The legalization of gay and single parent surrogacy in Cambodia requires a cautious, comprehensive, and well-regulated approach. Also, by learning from the experiences of other nations and focusing on making a comprehensive legal system that secures the rights of all parties included, particularly the child, Cambodia can take noteworthy steps toward this objective. 

Also, such laws would not only give clarity and security for those included in surrogacy programs but also reflect a dynamic and comprehensive position in recognizing the differing types of present day families.

[surrogacyservice]

LGBTQ+ Couples Can Start Their Family Through Surrogacy

For many LGBTQ+ couples, starting a family can be a challenging and emotional journey, but thanks to surrogacy, the path to parenthood has become more accessible. Surrogacy for LGBTQ+ parents offers an inclusive, reliable way for same-sex couples and individuals to have biological children. Through surrogacy, families are created, built on love and inclusivity, and free from the limitations that biology once imposed. This blog will explore the surrogacy process, its benefits for LGBTQ+ couples, and how to find the right agency to guide you through it.

Understanding Surrogacy for LGBTQ+ Parents

Surrogacy is a reproductive process in which a surrogate mother carries and delivers a child for another person or couple. In the case of gay surrogacy, the intended parents provide genetic material—either sperm or eggs—while a surrogate carries the pregnancy. This process has given LGBTQ+ parents a way to experience the joy of having a biological connection to their children.

LGBTQ surrogacy can be divided into two main types:

Traditional Surrogacy: In traditional surrogacy, the surrogate mother uses her own eggs and is inseminated with sperm from one of the intended fathers or a donor. This option is rarely used due to its legal complexities and emotional considerations, as the surrogate will be genetically related to the baby.

Gestational Surrogacy: In gestational surrogacy, the surrogate mother has no genetic link to the child. An egg from the intended mother or an egg donor is fertilized with sperm from the intended father or a sperm donor, and the embryo is implanted into the surrogate. This is the most common type of surrogacy, especially for LGBTQ+ couples, as it allows for both parents to contribute genetically when using their own sperm or eggs.

Why Choose Surrogacy as an LGBTQ+ Couple?

For LGBTQ+ couples, surrogacy offers a unique opportunity to have biological children. It’s a viable option for same-sex male couples, lesbian couples, and even single individuals looking to build a family. Some of the key reasons why LGBTQ+ couples opt for surrogacy include:

Biological Connection: Surrogacy allows one or both partners to have a genetic link to their child. In gay surrogacy, for instance, one partner can provide sperm, while an egg donor is used for fertilization.

Inclusive Process: Many surrogacy agencies are LGBTQ+ friendly and specialize in working with same-sex couples, ensuring that the process is welcoming and inclusive.

Legal Protections: In the U.S., laws surrounding surrogacy are clear in many states, offering legal protection and parental rights to LGBTQ+ parents. Working with the right surrogacy agency ensures that all legal matters are handled professionally.

Steps in the Surrogacy Process for LGBTQ+ Parents

Choosing a Surrogacy Agency

The first step is finding a reliable, LGBTQ+-friendly surrogacy agency. For example, parents in the U.S. can explore options like surrogacy agency in New York, surrogacy agency in Washington DC, or other regions. Agencies help navigate the entire process, from legal paperwork to matching with the surrogate.

Selecting a Surrogate

Agencies typically have a pool of pre-screened surrogates who are willing to carry a child for LGBTQ+ couples. Choosing the right surrogate is an emotional decision, but the agency will assist in ensuring that all parties are compatible.

Finding an Egg Donor

For gay couples, an egg donor is required. The egg donor can be anonymous or known to the intended parents. Egg donation agencies provide a wide range of donor profiles, making it easier to find a suitable match.

Medical Procedures

Once the surrogate and donor are chosen, medical procedures begin. In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is used to create embryos, which are then implanted into the surrogate’s womb. Throughout the pregnancy, the surrogate is closely monitored to ensure the health of the baby and mother.

Legal Agreements

Legal matters are crucial in surrogacy. Contracts must be drafted to protect the rights of both the surrogate and the intended parents. This includes parental rights, compensation for the surrogate, and other legal considerations.

Birth and Parental Rights

Once the baby is born, the intended parents are legally recognized as the child’s parents, and the surrogate relinquishes her parental rights. This final step completes the surrogacy process.

Benefits of LGBTQ+ Surrogacy

Choosing surrogacy offers numerous benefits for LGBTQ+ couples, such as:

Genetic Connection: Surrogacy allows one or both partners to be biologically related to the child, which is important for many couples.

Control Over the Process: With surrogacy, intended parents can choose their surrogate, egg donor, and medical team, giving them greater control over the process.

Legal Clarity: When working with a reputable surrogacy agency, all legal matters are handled, ensuring that parental rights are protected and clearly established.

Emotional Support: Surrogacy agencies provide emotional and psychological support for both the intended parents and the surrogate, making the journey smoother for everyone involved.

Choosing the Right Surrogacy Agency

One of the most important decisions in the surrogacy journey is selecting the right agency. For LGBTQ+ couples, finding an agency that is inclusive, supportive, and experienced in working with same-sex parents is crucial. Agencies such as Surrogacy Agency New York and Surrogacy Agency in Washington DC specialize in helping LGBTQ+ parents navigate the process.

When looking for an agency, consider the following factors:

Experience: Choose an agency with a proven track record of successful surrogacy arrangements, particularly with LGBTQ+ clients.

Support: Emotional, legal, and financial support are essential throughout the surrogacy journey. Make sure the agency provides comprehensive services that cover all aspects of the process.

Surrogate Screening: The agency should have a rigorous screening process for surrogates to ensure that they are physically and emotionally prepared for the journey.

Legal Expertise: Surrogacy laws vary by state, so it's essential to choose an agency with legal experts who are well-versed in surrogacy laws in your area.

Why Surrogacy4AllNow?

At Surrogacy4AllNow, we understand the unique challenges that LGBTQ+ couples face when starting a family. Our experienced team provides comprehensive support throughout the surrogacy process, from finding the right surrogate to handling legal matters. We work with surrogacy agencies in New York, Washington DC, and other regions to ensure that intended parents receive the best care possible. For more information, visit Surrogacy4AllNow and begin your journey to parenthood.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs):

Q. What is surrogacy for LGBTQ+ parents?

A. Surrogacy for LGBTQ+ parents is a process where a surrogate carries a child for same-sex couples or individuals who wish to have a biological child. It enables LGBTQ+ families to build families with a genetic link.

Q. How do LGBTQ+ couples choose between traditional and gestational surrogacy?

A. Most LGBTQ+ couples opt for gestational surrogacy, where the surrogate has no genetic connection to the baby. This is different from traditional surrogacy, where the surrogate’s egg is used.

Q. Are there surrogacy agencies specifically for LGBTQ+ couples?

A. Yes, many surrogacy agencies specialize in LGBTQ+ family-building. Agencies in cities like New York, Washington DC, and Dallas are known for offering tailored services to same-sex couples.

Q. How can gay couples find an egg donor for surrogacy?

A. Gay couples typically work with egg donor agencies to find a donor. The surrogate then carries the fertilized embryo created through IVF.

Q. Is surrogacy legal for LGBTQ+ parents in the U.S.?

A. Yes, surrogacy is legal in many U.S. states for LGBTQ+ parents, with laws varying by state. It’s important to work with a legal expert to ensure all legal matters are handled properly.

Q. How can I start my surrogacy journey as an LGBTQ+ parent?

A. Begin by researching agencies like Surrogacy4AllNow, which specialize in LGBTQ+ surrogacy. Our team can guide you through every step, from finding a surrogate to managing legal issues.

Conclusion

For LGBTQ+ couples, surrogacy is a life-changing opportunity to create a family. The process can be complex, but with the right support, it becomes a rewarding journey toward parenthood. Whether you’re considering surrogacy in the U.S. with agencies like surrogacy agency New York or surrogacy agency in Washington DC, or simply looking to explore your options, finding the right professionals is key.  Surrogacy is about creating families, and LGBTQ+ parents have more options than ever before to realize their dreams of parenthood. For further guidance, visit Surrogacy4AllNow and let us help you take the first step.

Reference: https://surrogacy-services-in-usa.blogspot.com/2024/10/lgbtq-couples-can-start-their-family.html

[gaylovingbirds]

@worldcenterofbaby For any transgender or gay people thinking about having a biological child – the cost of the us is almost 200k. You can half that cost by going to a full service surrogacy agency like world center of baby.

https://worldcenterofbaby.com/

#surrogacy #transgender #gayparents #gayadoption #lgbtq #lgbtqparents #transkidsarevalid #greenscreen

[jamelawsonus]

Love Without Boundaries: Surrogacy Empowering Gay Parents

Introduction

Love knows no boundaries, and the desire to become a parent transcends gender and sexual orientation. In recent years, surrogacy has emerged as a transformative option for gay couples and individuals seeking to fulfill their dreams of parenthood. Surrogacy provides a pathway for gay parents to create loving families, overcoming the challenges they may face due to biological limitations. This article explores the powerful role of surrogacy in empowering gay parents and highlights the support provided by Physicians Surrogacy, an agency committed to helping gay parents navigate their surrogacy journey.

The Changing Landscape of Parenthood

Surrogacy: A Path to Parenthood

Surrogacy is a process in which a woman carries a pregnancy on behalf of intended parents who are unable to conceive or carry a child themselves. For gay parents, surrogacy offers the opportunity to have a biological connection to their child while embracing the joys of parenthood.

Overcoming Biological Limitations

Biological limitations can present unique challenges for gay couples and individuals desiring to have children. Surrogacy provides a solution by allowing gay parents to have a biological connection to their child through the use of assisted reproductive technologies, including in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer.

The Role of Physicians Surrogacy in Empowering Gay Parents

Expertise and Support

Physicians Surrogacy recognizes the specific needs and aspirations of gay parents. They provide comprehensive support and expertise throughout the surrogacy journey, offering guidance on legal, medical, and emotional aspects. Their experienced team of professionals is dedicated to ensuring that gay parents receive the necessary resources and support to navigate the process successfully.

Matching Intended Parents with Surrogates

Physicians Surrogacy understands the importance of finding the right surrogate for gay parents. They facilitate a thorough matching process that takes into account the preferences and expectations of the intended parents. This personalized approach helps foster a strong and supportive relationship between the surrogate and the gay parents, creating a foundation of trust and understanding.

Legal Guidance and Protection

Navigating the legal landscape of surrogacy can be complex, especially for gay parents. Physicians Surrogacy provides specialized legal guidance to ensure that the rights and interests of the intended parents and the surrogate are protected. This support helps create a secure legal framework and establishes clear rights and responsibilities for all parties involved.

The Surrogacy Journey for Gay Parents

Emotional Preparation

Embarking on the surrogacy journey requires emotional preparation for gay parents. Physicians Surrogacy offers counseling services and emotional support to help gay parents navigate their expectations, concerns, and the potential challenges they may encounter. This support system helps them navigate the emotional aspects of the journey and build resilience.

Building Strong Connections

Surrogacy allows gay parents to form a unique and profound connection with their surrogate. Physicians Surrogacy encourages open communication and fosters positive relationships between the intended parents and the surrogate. These connections not only provide support throughout the surrogacy journey but also create lasting bonds that can extend beyond the birth of the child.

Celebrating Parenthood

Surrogacy culminates in the joyous moment when gay parents finally hold their child in their arms. Physicians Surrogacy celebrates this milestone and ensures that gay parents receive ongoing support and resources as they transition into their new role as parents. They provide guidance on parenting skills, support networks, and access to relevant resources for nurturing their child's well-being.

Conclusion

Surrogacy has become a transformative option for gay parents, empowering them to build families filled with love and joy. Through the support and guidance of agencies like Physicians Surrogacy, gay parents can navigate the complexities of the surrogacy process with confidence. Surrogacy breaks down barriers and allows gay parents to overcome biological limitations, embracing the journey of parenthood. Love knows no boundaries, and surrogacy offers a path for gay parents to experience the profound joys of raising a child while creating a loving and nurturing environment for their family.

[drdemonprince]

I remember when civil unions for same-sex couples were legalized in 2016. I was only 17 at the time, and I was still dealing with a lot of stuff. Marriage was only a very far thought in the back of my mind, but still, I remember being so happy to hear that news. It was a new option for me, one that could also open up to the possibility of having a child someday, something I had never really considered possible before that time. It’s been several years now, and little to no progress has been made. I hate how slow this process is. And now we’re going backwards I’m still quite young, only 25, but I already know I would like to become a parent. It’s a difficult feeling to describe. I want to love another human being in the same way that my father and my mother have done with me. I want my boyfriend to become a dad and I want to be by his side throughout all of it. When I see my boyfriend playing with my one-year-old niece, I daydream about having a son or a daughter of our own. I want to see my parents love my child like they loved me. I want to see their smiles while they’re rocking my baby to sleep. I want to tear up at my son or daughter’s graduation. I want to be nervous about the person they’re bringing home for dinner. I want to fear for their safety. I want to trust them to make the right choices. I want to be sad about seeing them move to another city. I want to be proud of their accomplishments. I want to hope that they’ll be happy with the life they’ve chosen and that I’ve helped them build. I want to feel all of it.

A heartbreaking piece from Giulio Serafini on Italy's universal ban on surrogacy -- a policy that I'm embarrassed to admit I was not aware of until just now. Surrogacy was already banned within the country prior to this year, but this new policy now bars prospective parents from conceiving via surrogacy anywhere in the world and then bringing their children back. Between this and the country's complete ban on gay adoption, it's now impossible for same-sex couples to have children.

[meleys-the-red-queen]

The amount of blood-purity comments I see in HOTD discussions is honestly wild to me because it’s like. There’s legitimately people saying Rhaenyra can’t or shouldn’t be queen because she’s trying to put “bastards” in the line of succession.

1. Who. The hell. Cares. Who their actual biological father is? Why do we care? What difference does it make? Laenor, Corlys, Viserys recognized them and reaffirmed them in the line of succession MULTIPLE TIMES. No one *who is actually important to the issue* cares who the boys’ biological father is, and their claim comes from their mother, the named heir, the Queen, who can then decide who her heir is, just like Jaehaerys did, and just like Viserys did. Laenor was a gay man, they said they tried to conceive. They couldn’t. What other option was there? Laenor seemed to have no problem with Harwin helping them sire their children while he went off and enjoyed himself.

(Also, the plot to usurp Rhaenyra came long before the three Velaryon boys were born because *she was a woman.* The appearance of her three oldest boys was just another convenient excuse)

2. Would a child in modern day conceived through surrogacy or sperm donation be considered illegitimate/a bastard if one of the parents dies but still has that child in their will? Can the other family members contest it on the basis of “well they’re not blood related so they can’t inherit anything.” Nope. Because that child is recognized and legally theirs, therefore entitled to whatever the parent/family says.

[scrapyardboyfriends]

Reasons why they should bring Seb back

Now that they’ve gone through the trouble of killing Rebecca off screen (hooray! It’s about time!), it seems only logical that they would do the right thing and bring Seb back, which means I have absolutely zero confidence in them doing so. But here’s my list of why they really really should, as I have been advocating for years now.

Section 1: It would break Aaron out of character growth jail. Since Robert went to prison, Aaron has lost so much. He’s lost a husband and a sister. He lost being a married man, owning his own home and owning his own business. And one of the most important growth things he lost was being a father. He’d already lost Seb and Ryan leaving wrecked the surrogacy story. So bringing Seb back would:

1. Allow Aaron to fulfill the dream he had of being a father and having a family. So many characters just get handed unwanted children but Aaron actually wanted to be a dad and so of course he lost out on that. Giving him Seb would allow him to realize that goal again.

2. Allow Aaron to grow up again. Since his return, he’s been angry, mean, adrift, committing petty crime again for no reason. Seb being back would give him purpose and a reason to clean up his act. It would allow him to get to be an adult again, something the character sorely needs.

3. Allow Aaron to have screen time and positive story. Aaron has been off screen a lot, so much so that all of his current relationship story development has taken place almost entirely off screen. Seb being back would give Aaron an actual story to play out, especially if there were difficulties in getting formal custody. It’s also a story that would have a happy outcome, once he gets custody, which is something the show could really use right now in the midst of all of the depressing terrible stories. And Aaron has always had such a miserable time on the show so I feel like people would root for something good to happen to him.

4. Allow Aaron to have new kinds of stories. Single Dad Aaron opens up so man new possibilities for him, being able to take on a parental role, having to think about Seb’s needs and not just his own.

5. Allow Aaron to have a full circle moment looking after a troubled kid the way Paddy looked after him.

6. Allow Aaron to interact with new characters. Single Dad Aaron would have more opportunity to interact with the other parents in the village. It might give him more reason to have a proper friendship with Billy for example aside from silly illegal boxing stories. It puts him into new circles, which can open him up for new possibilities.

Section 2: Seb gives Aaron a permanent tie to Robert. For whatever reason, the powers that be seem unwilling to let Aaron fully move on from Robert (that’s another whole post I want to write) but this would give them real reason for Robert to be a constant presence in Aaron’s life without it seeming weird or needing Ryan back. It allows him to never fully move on. The Seb/Robert connection:

1. Allows Aaron to keep Robert in his heart through Seb. He can bring him up with Seb, helping his son love his father and making sure he knows who he was/is.

2. Allows Aaron to maybe hear from Robert from time to time. Robert might have to consent to Aaron being the one to have custody of Seb and Robert wanting that, would be a nice signal to Aaron to that Robert still loves him and trusts him.

3. Allows Aaron to maybe finally deal with some of his Robert feelings in a more productive way, in a more positive way. And because he’s raising his kid, in a way that perhaps even his mother could understand and allow.

4. Allows Aaron to bring Robert up in any new relationship, not just because the show makes him accidentally sleep with Robert’s long lost gay half brother. He needs to consider Seb’s feelings in any new relationship and part of that can be whether Robert would approve of said new man in his son’s life.

5. Allows for an even more interesting return story should they ever actually coax Ryan Hawley back.

Section 3: Bringing Seb back can be a part of rebuilding the Sugdens. Obviously that was a line they used in reference to bringing John in and we’ve seen what a joke that has been. However, Seb:

1. Is the son of the ultimate Emmerdale Sugden legacy character, Robert. And he’s not retconned in the way John is. He’s someone people can watch grow up and continue the family legacy, especially if they go the full mile and give him his proper name.

2. Allows them to bring Aaron more into the Sugden family. While, yes, Seb would probably get lumped into the Dingles at times because of Aaron, Aaron can also get brought into Sugden family time, such as it is.

3. Allows them to give Vic and Harry more screen time, and use Vic’s obsessive family tendencies to get Seb back, giving her something positive to do instead of just being annoying. It maybe lets Harry become more of an actual character if he has a cousin with story potential.

4. Gives the Sugdens, such as they are, someone to rally around in general.

5. Is actually related to people like the Merricks, unlike Vic, if they wanted to explore that connection as well.

Section 4: Bringing Seb back is the perfect opportunity to use the fact that Danny is good with the kids.

1. Danny is great with the kids on screen and off and the kids seem to love him back.

2. It would be a better way to use some of his more cringe humor.

3. If they actually cast a good kid actor that Danny can play off of well, they could be such a fun little duo.

Section 5: There’s no reason not to do it. There’s nothing stopping them other than their own inability to tell a good or even mediocre story.

1. They’ve already gone through the trouble of killing Rebecca off. What was the point of that if they’re not going to bring Seb back. They’ve already done half the work.

2. It’s not contingent on getting an actor like Ryan back. They can literally cast any red headed or blonde child for the role (hopefully a good one but I digress…)

So in conclusion: BRING SEB HOME!

[eternal-echoes]

The poll

I don't think it's just that; I think more and more people are realizing that every child deserves a mother and a father and legalizing gay marriage deliberately deprives a kid of one of them. Orphans and children of single parents always long for their missing parents.

While there are unfortunate circumstances like death of a parent or divorcing an abusive spouse that makes it inevitable, ultimately since children are made through the biological union of a man and woman, their spiritual relationship with them should be preserved.

Since we're not just a material being, we're also of both body and soul. Not Cartesian dualism but Hylomorphism where the union of body and soul makes one nature.

The only two ways a gay couple can have a baby is either through surrogacy and/or adoption. Along with its ethical concerns with buying a baby, a gay couple taking a newly born baby from his/her mother is depriving that child with the much needed bonding time with the mother (i.e. breastfeeding, cuddling, etc). It's illegal to sell a puppy within 8 weeks of birth because it would be too cruel to separate it from its mother,* then how much more devastating would it be when it comes to a human child? And a child's need for a mother doesn't stop when he/she no longer needs to be breastfed, the mother is essential for the child's emotional maturity as well.

Here is a video of Ryan T. Anderson back in 2014. I'll highlight some important points but the whole video is really good.

Marriage exists to unite a man and a woman as husband and wife to then be equipped to be mother and father to any children that that union produces. It's based on the biological fact that men and women are distinct and complementary, it's based on the anthropological truth that reproduction requires a man and a woman, it's based on the social reality that children deserve a mother and a father. ... Marriage is the institution that different cultures and societies, across time and place, developed to maximize the likelihood that that man commits to that woman, and then the two of them take responsibility to raise that child. Part of this is based on the reality: there's no such thing as parenting in the abstract; there's mothering and there's fathering. Men and women bring different gifts to the parenting enterprise. Rutgers sociologist professor David Popenoe writes, "The burden of social science evidence supports the idea that gender differentiating parenting is important for human development and the contribution of fathers to childrearing is unique and irreplaceable." He then concludes, "we should disavow the notion that mommies can make good daddies, just as we should disavow the popular notion that daddies can make good mommies. The two sexes are different to the core and each is necessary, culturally and biologically for the optimal development of a human being." ... The impact of marriage. So why does marriage matter for public policy? Perhaps there's no better way to analyze this than looking to our own president, President Barrack Obama: "We know the statistics that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime, nine times more likely to drop out of schools, and 20 times more likely to end up in prison. They're more likely to have behavioral problems or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundation of our community are weaker because of it." ... President Obama sums it up very well: what we've seen in the past 50 years since the War on Poverty began, is that the family has collapsed. At one point in America virtually every child was given the gift of a married mother and father, those numbers right now: it's more than 50% of Hispanics children are born outside of wedlock, more than 70% of African Americans are born outside of wedlock. And the consequences for those children are really serious. The State's interest in marriage is not that it cares about my love life, or your love life, or anyone's love life just for the sake of romance. The State's interest in marriage is ensuring that those kids have fathers who are involved in their lives. ... If the biggest social problem we face right now in the United States is absentee dads, how will we insist that fathers are essential when the law redefines marriage to make fathers optional? ... Think about the social consequences if that's the direction the slippery slope in which marriage redefinition would go. For every additional sexual partner I have, and for the shorter lived those relationships are, the greater the chances that I create children with multiple women, without commitment with either to those mothers or to those kids. It increases the likelihood of creating fragmented families and then big government will step in to pick up the pieces with a host of welfare programs that truly drain the economic prospects of all of our states. ... So for all those reasons this is why the State and all states have an interest in preserving the definition of marriage as a union, permanent and exclusive of a man and a woman.

Also an article supporting some of Ryan T. Anderson's points:

It’s worse to be raised by a single mother, even if you’re not poor.

The reason for this is that fathers tend to be the disciplinarian in the family. They provide the moral framework in his children's lives.

Reminder that even though the Catholic Church does not support gay marriage, it doesn't mean that she hates gay people. There is a ministry called Courage International where people with same-sex attractions are encourage to live chaste and holy lives.

*Original wording taken from here.

[mprgz]

Help, I'm a Man who Recently Got a Woman Pregnant Unexpectedly, and She Wants Me to Carry It, What should I do?

There are a lot of myths surrounding pregnancy in males, especially outside of marriage. To begin with, the health risks in pregnancy are about the same between the genders. So, unless one partner has a specific health issue affecting her ability to carry a child to term, this shouldn't be a major issue of consideration.

Deciding which parent should carry the baby is a personal issue between the couples. You are well within your rights to refuse to carry the baby. Unless the mother has a major health issue, you shouldn't feel pressured to carry it. Deciding to get pregnant is a personal decision, and you shouldn't feel undo pressure to do so.

This article aims to answer common questions and misconceptions about male pregnancy in that situation.

Will people think I'm gay if I'm pregnant?

Although being pregnant for the first time can be an embarrassing experience as a man, the majority (up to 70%) of pregnant men are heterosexual. Although heterosexual pregnancy is less common in some regions, any social stigma is a minor issue compared to the other difficulties of pregnancy and childbirth.

I've heard that I can't terminate the pregnancy if I'm a man?

This is false. However, you will likely legally be classified as a "surrogate" in your situation: if the fetus was first gestated by someone else and you are not married, even if you are the biological father. In many states, there are laws against 'surrogacy extortion', in which a surrogate would threaten to terminate a pregnancy in bad faith. Only a few cases of surrogacy extortion have been recorded, but it caused a moral panic, and over-zealous laws preventing a largely imaginary problem.

In order to terminate a surrogate pregnancy, you will generally need permission from the mother or a valid health concern. If you want to terminate the pregnancy, you should talk to her about it directly, not try to do on a technicality. However, the law is fairly generous on the definition of a "Valid health concern" for the purpose of terminating a pregnancy. The law exists to prevent men from accepting the fetus transfer as a way to terminate the pregnancy in bad faith. Bear in mind that this only applies to to cases of embryo/fetus transfer. If you are pregnant from IVF, with the intent of bearing your own child, the surrogacy extortion laws can not apply to you.

But if I'm legally a surrogate, what are the implications of that?

The law is a bit double-minded on this point. With respect to employment rights and insurance, as long as you are carrying a pregnancy that is yours, you think is yours, or you at least have, "a reasonable belief that you may be the father," you have all the rights of parenthood toward everyone except the mother.

This may be confusing or nonsensical, but the law's position is that no one besides the mother has an interest in your pregnancy. So, no one else has 'standing' to question if you really are the father or not.

What happens if I'm not the father?

Legally, you would be consenting to a surrogacy in most states. Accurate DNA testing is difficult at that stage, and there is a risk of carrying someone else's child. If you are not comfortable with that risk, you should not consent to pregnancy transfer.

In the eyes of the law, since you have no obligation to carry the child, you aren't getting pregnant because you are the father, but because of a mutual agreement between two people. The mother doesn't have a legal obligation to disclose cheating, so you are assumed to take that risk.

However, if you are not the father, the actual parents will be responsible for your medical bills. To avoid any legal trouble, if you have doubts, have per specify on the medical paperwork that you are the father or the supposed father. Likewise, a notarized statement that you are the father, supposed father, or most likely father will stand up in court. If you are the father, she shouldn't have an objection to declaring so.

Will carrying the baby help in custody disputes?

Technically it is not a legal consideration, but the courts generally look favorable on fathers who help out during pregnancy. If you are concerned with custody issues, it is generally advised to carry the pregnancy.

But it is often more important to consider how you carry the pregnancy than that you carry the pregnancy. Illegal drug use, alcohol, and tobacoo should be obviously avoided during pregnancy. Likewise, you should keep all your wellness visits and medical checkups. A record of irresponsible behavior during pregnancy often outweighs any sympathy the court has for decision to carry the baby.

She says that she is not allowed to carry the baby for work or legal reasons. Is this true?

Generally no, work contracts can not forbid pregnancy. If she is a freelancer or independent contractor, she might mean that she will have trouble finding work. If you are planning on marrying or otherwise forming a permenent relationship, you may want to consider if her work situation makes it more reasonable for you to carry the pregnancies. Additionally, if she does take a significant income loss due to maternity reasons, that may increase your child support.

There is one exception: during wartime or other recruitment services, it may be illegal for people in the millitary to become pregnant. In that situation, you may want to consider carrying the baby. The courts can not retaliate against you for refusing to carry the pregnancy, but if you desire any relationship with the mother at all, you should carry the pregnancy or agree to a termination.

I might or might not be the father. Should I still carry the baby?

Again, this is a personal decision. Ideally, you should not let yourself get into such situations. In cases with disputed paternity, it is common for all potential fathers to believe that they 'just can't' be the father. Often, this is wishful thinking. If you had relations in the correct timeframe and she thinks that you are the father, odds are that you are as likely as anyone to be the father.

You need to balance your concerns with not carrying your child (which you would have if you as asking this question) against your concerns with carrying a child that isn't yours. If she can carry the baby, maybe its more fair is she does it, since she is 100% the mother, while you might have a 50% or 33% chance that you are the father.

But conversely, if she is asking you to carry the baby, and 'thinks' you are the father, the odds of being the father are closer to 90% than 50%. It is very unlikely that she is tricking you into carrying someone else's baby. She, may, however, be hiding unfaithfulness if you are in a committed relationship. So ironically, she's less likely to be lying if the baby was concieved outside of the relationship.

Final Remarks

If you are seriously considering this question, the answer is probably 'yes' you should carry the baby. Ask yourself if you have good reasons not to do it, if not, you probably just need to convince yourself. And remember that communication with the mother is one of the most important aspects of pregnancy.

[girlfishes]

In my recent post about the surrogacy law change in Italy, I got a lot of responses along the lines of “if gay men want kids they should just adopt them” .

Besides the fact that some of y’all need to learn to read (it literally says in the screenshots I posted that they aren’t allowed to adopt in Italy), I’m concerned with how adoption is considered a solution for people who can’t have kids.

Adopted kids don’t come from the aether. And the adoption industry, especially in my country (usa), is very exploitative of low income or otherwise disadvantaged women and children. This, in combination with our terrible criminal justice system, puts a lot of kids with living parents up for adoption when it is possible for them to remain with their birth families, which is almost always best for the mother and child. All of this, and I haven’t even touched on the ethical nightmare of international adoption.

I understand the need for adoption if the kid has literally no living family, but then the adoption would happen for the sake of the kid, not to complete some stranger’s family.

All of this to say, if you consider adoption to be the “solution” to infertility, please do some research.

[coochiequeens]

A woman wanted to have a relationship with the child she gave birth to. And the men's response "was to insist that their son had no mother — only a surrogate — and that the child’s identity was as part of a motherless family." But the kid was created from her egg. She is the kids biological mother.

5 June, 2024 By Julie Bindel

This article is taken from the June 2024 issue of The Critic. To get the full magazine why not subscribe? Right now we’re offering five issues for just £10.

There is a contradiction at the heart of the international surrogacy industry. Its participants pretend that surrogates’ feelings for the children in their wombs do not exist, whilst simultaneously trying to prevent them acting on those feelings. Many commissioning parents broker the babies in jurisdictions that allow restrictions on surrogates’ rights.

In the UK, this contradiction was recently laid bare in a Family Court case (citation number: [2024] EWFC 20). A gay male couple were engaged in a long-running legal battle with their son’s surrogate. Rather than vanish after handing over the child, she wanted a role in the boy’s life. The men’s response was to insist that their son had no mother — only a surrogate — and that the child’s identity was as part of a motherless family. There was “no vacancy” for her to occupy in his life, they claimed, and it was prejudicial to gay families to suggest otherwise.

At the start of this story, G, the surrogate in question, was a 36-year-old single mother of a teenager and naive about what surrogacy entailed. The commissioning parents were friends of her sister but not people she knew. Aged 43 and 36 and married, they were members of an agency, Surrogacy UK, and very familiar with its protocols — which included a “getting to know you” period — and support. However rather than go through the agency, the men chose to fast-track the process with an independent arrangement with G.

Following a failed transfer of a donor egg, the trio decided to use G’s own egg. The men agreed that G would have contact with the child, but none of the parties properly considered the implications. The relationship between the three deteriorated during G’s pregnancy. G gave birth to a boy in September 2020.

After the birth, G would not initially consent to the parental order, under which she would lose parental responsibility as she feared being cut out of the child’s life. But during a lengthy online hearing in which she was alone and unrepresented — unlike the men — G was pressured by the judge to agree to the parental order along with a contact agreement called a child arrangements order.

After obtaining parental responsibility, the men quickly reneged on the agreement. When G turned up at their house for a pre-arranged visit they threatened to call the police. She recorded the meeting. The Family Court judge later declared of the recording “what was said has rightly been described as ‘horrendous’”. The men told G she was “harbouring a desire to have an inappropriate relationship” by wanting the boy to recognise her as his mother and accused her of having “rejected the role of surrogate”.

In January 2022, the men refused to allow G to visit her son and applied for the contact agreement to be changed. G then made her own application for the parental order to be overturned. She won her case in November the same year. This restored her parental responsibility for the child and removed it from the man who was not the child’s biological father.

The men redoubled their efforts to remove G as a parent, this time applying for an adoption order. During court proceedings, they claimed their son’s identity was that of a child of same-sex parents being raised within the LGBT community and that he belonged to a “motherless family”.

As a lesbian who came out in the 1970s, I’m only too aware of the history of demonisation of lesbian and gay couples. Parents who conceived children in heterosexual relationships were often denied custody and contact if they came out as gay after separation. Foster and adoption agencies were openly prejudiced. But times have changed, and same-sex parents are now a common sight at the school gates in some parts of the UK.

Claims that the children of same-sex parents are disadvantaged in some way have largely been defeated with an expanding body of evidence (e.g. Zhang Y, Huang H, Wang M, et al., BMJ Global Health, 2023) showing their outcomes are similar to those of heterosexual families. Gay rights are robustly supported in most public institutions and private organisations. For a gay couple to call on historic prejudice to justify excluding a mother from a child’s life is unforgivable.

In any case, the men’s argument was fatally — and obviously — undermined by its own logic. If the boy did not have a mother, there would be no need for the court case.

As the jointly-instructed clinical psychologist in the case recognised, the driver of the men’s case was the “elephant in the room” — G’s existence as the child’s legal and biological mother — and the men’s fear of her maternal bond with her son. The men had difficulties “accepting the reality” of the child’s conception, the psychologist found, and considering what sense the boy might make of the situation as he grew up.

“They have strongly held to the surrogacy agreement and the narrative of [G] being a ‘surrogate’ because in that narrative there are no, or hardly any feelings from the surrogate for the baby,” the psychologist wrote. He described the men as attempting an “erasure of the mother”, which he said was not in the child’s best interest as it did not reflect reality.

Refusing an adoption order that would likely have resulted in cutting G from her son’s life, the court ruled that G should have direct and unsupervised contact with him. The judge criticised the men for blaming G for everything that went wrong. The judgment also raised questions about how an adoption order would be explained to the boy, given it would have been made without his mother’s consent.

To some extent, history repeated itself in this case. There are multiple examples of legal battles involving lesbian couples who created a child with the help of a sperm donor who later inconveniently insisted on contact or on playing the role of father.

As the Court of Appeal ruled in one such case in 2012: “What the adults look forward to before undertaking the hazards of conception, birth and the first experience of parenting may prove to be illusion or fantasy. [The couple] may have had the desire to create a two-parent lesbian nuclear family completely intact and free from fracture resulting from contact with the third parent. But such desires may be essentially selfish and may later insufficiently weigh the welfare and developing rights of the child that they have created.”

What’s concerning in this case is the language used — the “erasure” of the mother

Contested surrogacy cases are little different from these wrangles and, indeed, from any other contact disputes. What’s concerning about G’s case, and what makes it different from the case of the lesbian parents above, is the language used. The psychologist explicitly referred to the men’s attempted “erasure” of the mother. They simply refused to acknowledge G’s existence in any of the forms in which she fulfilled a maternal capacity: legal, genetic and as the person who gave birth. They were supported in this illusion by the professionals who weighed in on their behalf.

In the space of a few years the term “motherless” has moved from an emotive description of absence to a positive identity argued for in court. This shift is entirely consistent with the narrative that surrogacy participants feed to the public.

When celebrity couples introduce their surrogate children on social media, the women who gave birth to them are rarely mentioned. The new babies are “welcomed” as if they have been sent by special delivery. That is in line with the attitude of the international surrogacy industry, which reduces the role of the birth mother to that of a “carrier” or rented womb.

For commissioning parents, it must be very easy to regard the woman who bore their child for nine months as a mere service provider, someone to be gratefully forgotten as soon as the final instalment is paid and the product handed over.

Meanwhile, parts of the NHS are determined to de-gender childbirth, routinely referring to “birthing parents” rather than mothers. As an example (there are multiple) the Royal United Hospital Bath’s “information for families” on labour induction refers to dads, but there is no mention of mothers — only birthing parents.

Feminists have long campaigned for gender-neutral language to reflect roles that are indeed, or can be, gender-neutral. But the uncoupling of sex from the necessarily female processes of pregnancy and childbirth is a step towards a dystopian future. In 2015 Victoria Smith wrote, “Gender-neutral language around reproduction creates the illusion of dismantling a hierarchy — when what you really end up doing is ignoring it.” I would go further. Gender-neutral language around reproduction — just like any language that obscures reality — reinforces and helps establish hierarchies of oppression.

To the men, G was simply a surrogate womb to a motherless child. But to G and to Z, she was his mother. As the psychologist said, “‘Motherlessness’ does not exist. The child was born from two people, biologically, and from three people, psychologically … The mother certainly played a part, biologically and psychologically, in the conception of the child.”

The case — unremarked and unnoticed by the media — will do nothing to change popular opinion of surrogacy. It is likely to encourage intending parents to explore dubious overseas jurisdictions, where surrogates have fewer rights. The surrogacy profiteers will continue to cheerlead wealthy couples in their exploitation of impoverished and naive women.

As for the word “motherless”: in time it may lose its negative connotations and become solidified as an identity. Will it become a badge that straight children can use to signal their connection to LGBTQ+ community? Or an oppression card that can be deployed by the children of wealthy men to explain bad behaviour towards women? Either way, Disney and Dickens are going to need a lot of rewriting.

[dearweirdme]

Living in South Korea would make it challenging for Taehyung to have a family as a single, non married man. Surrogacy is not legal or illegal, but the parent needs to adopt the child. The same would go, I gather, if you used a surrogate elsewhere and then brought the baby to SK. The surrogate mother is also considered the legal mother. While laws are changing, same sex couples are not able to adopt - and single men who want to adopt are seen as suspicious.

Given how filial Taehyung is, I don’t see him leaving SK and moving someplace else. His family, friends and work are in SK.

Seems like a bit of a conundrum.

Hi anon!

So even when I say this is offensive, you don’t take a moment to consider why that is and your response is to tell me about legislation? I’m aware of legislation… you however, are not taking queer people’s feelings and relationships seriously.

Let’s take this conversation away from Tae for a second, because I think it’s because of him that you find this difficult (wether it’s the need to have him be with a woman, or just that you enjoy the mystery more than his actual feelings I’m not sure).

Imagine for a bit that you’re a gay man. You’ve known since puberty that you are gay. You’ve struggled with coming out, because you know society is harsh and you will lose loved ones when you do. When you fall deeply in love though.. you do. You want to be with your partner in public and your love for each other means that you will sacrifice the relationships with loves ones who don’t accept you. That is how deeply you love each other. Life is hard, but love is strong and the two of you are happy and you want to stay together for the rest of your lives (not different from straight people at all). When the topic of marriage is prompted.. do your thoughts go to your partner, or do your thoughts go to an unknown woman even though you have been very much in love with a man for years and have built a life together?

Sk might be behind in queer legislation, but queer couples do exist. The queer community does fight for legislation to change for the very reason that they are incapable of changing who they are. They see the world change around them, they know that somewhere on the horizon there’s a strong possibility of them obtaining more rights.. because that is what’s happening in the world. When you diminish a queer couple’s feelings of love as though it is something they would consider leaving behind.. as if they would consider being with a partner of the opposite sex because it’s easier.. you do not understand the hardships they have possibly already gone through and you do not understand anything about love.

I’ll do you one better. I have recently watched The Boyfriend on Netflix. It’s a Japanese queer dating show on which we see queer men (two bisexuals and the rest gay) living in a house together for a couple of weeks while trying to find love. Two of them actually start falling in love and do you know what they talk about on one of their dates? Adopting a child. Japan doesn’t allow gay marriage and therefore doesn’t allow queer couples to adopt. Do you think these two men, while on a queer dating show…. on a date with each other… are talking about having a family with a woman?

Do better anon! Seriously, please invest in watching footage of queer couples trying to have a family. Go and watch same sex couples finally being able to marry when their country allows them.

If Tae is queer like we think, and in a relationship with Jk for years.. when prompted about marriage he would think of Jk and starting a family with him. The idea of it having to be a female comes from you and from homophobic society.. it has nothing to do with the reality and feelings of actual queer couples.