#Presidential Recordings
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
Are there any tapes of lbj not being gentle with the johnson treatment?
You bet there are!
My favorite is this phone call with Senator Richard Russell of Georgia. Senator Russell had been one of Lyndon Johnson's mentors in Congress. When Johnson arrived in Washington, he quickly recognized that Russell was a lonely bachelor and workaholic with no close friends or family, so he ingratiated himself with Russell, invited him to meals and holidays at the Johnson home so that Russell felt like he was part of the family. LBJ relentlessly sucked up to Russell and treated him as a father figure throughout Johnson's time in Congress, even after Johnson became Senate Majority Leader (LBJ did the same thing with powerful House Speaker Sam Rayburn).
When John F. Kennedy was assassinated, the relationship between LBJ and his longtime mentor quickly changed. In the days following the assassination, LBJ formed the Warren Commission to investigate the President's murder, and he was determined to have Russell be a part of the Commission, but Senator Russell hated Chief Justice Earl Warren, who LBJ put in charge of the Commission. Russell kept trying to beg off of serving on the Commission for various reasons -- not knowing that, while he was speaking on the phone to LBJ, Johnson had already officially released the names of the Commission's members to the press. (Which led to this great exchange: RUSSELL: "Mr. President, please..." LBJ: "No, it's already done. It's been announced." RUSSELL: (Shocked and stammering) "You mean you gave..." LBJ: "Yes, sir. I gave the announcement, it's already in the papers...")
So we have the audio of this remarkable phone call from November 29, 1963 between Senator Russell and LBJ. If you listen to the entire phone call, you hear LBJ go from 0 to 100 with the Johnson Treatment -- he begins with flattery and heartfelt appeals to Russell's patriotism before making it clear (in the segment of the phone call posted below) that he's not really asking Russell; he's telling him that he's going to be a part of the Commission, making it clear that the dynamic has changed and that President Johnson is the most powerful person in the world and not afraid to prove it. The crazy thing is that, at the time of this phone call, LBJ had only been President for exactly one week. He hadn't even moved into the White House yet! But this is where we get this quintessential Johnson Treatment moment:
"You are my man on that Commission and you are gonna do it. And don't tell me what you can do and what you can't because I can't arrest you and I'm not gonna put the FBI on you, but you're goddamn sure gonna serve, I'll tell you that!"
youtube
#History#Presidents#Lyndon B. Johnson#LBJ#Lyndon Johnson#President Johnson#Johnson Treatment#Presidency#Presidential History#White House Tapes#LBJ Tapes#LBJ Library#LBJ Foundation#Presidential Tapes#Presidential Phone Calls#Presidential Recordings#Warren Commission#Richard Russell#Assassination of John F. Kennedy#Kennedy Assassination#JFK Assassination#Politics
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
If you hear Republicans speak to other Republicans, you'll hear a lot of them say that they really don't like Trump for whatever reason (many of them aren't fans of the felony convictions, his personal manner, his business dealings, his family life, or whatever else) but that they'll still be voting for him because he'll get them closer to what they ultimately want. They're pragmatic; they don't demand purity in their candidate. They recognise him as their strategic choice so they'll set aside the issues they have with him and vote as a bloc. That's what makes them effective at getting their way. That's how they win elections.
And boy I wish we had more of that attitude on the left. Imagine what we could get done.
#this isn't to say we shouldn't hold candidates to any kind of standard#it's that the relentless purity testing the left subjects itself to arguably does our opponents' work for us#it's so much harder to convince progressives to vote if the relevant candidate isn't entirely perfect with a 100% clean record#(which arguably no one has because the definition of perfect is going to differ person to person and also just... people have flaws)#whereas clearly conservatives take barely any persuading at all to turn up en masse and vote for the worst people ever#EVEN when they aren't totally on board with every aspect of those people#politics#us politics#american politics#us election#election 2024#2024 elections#us elections#2024 presidential election#project 2025#please vote#your vote matters#voting matters#my posts
854 notes
·
View notes
Text
You all don’t seem to understand, they are going to amendment 25 trump and put Vance in office! THIS is what the heritage foundation wanted all along. VOTE BLUE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!💙
#congress#senate#he wont release his medical records#jd vance#2024 presidential election#vote blue#vote kamala#kamala 2024#kamala harris#donald trump#democrats#republicans#politics#mental health#mental illness#blacklivesmatter#black lives matter
66 notes
·
View notes
Text
Never mess with an archivist.
327 notes
·
View notes
Text
18 minutes in and he’s just mentioned Reagan for the first time
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
I scoured Vance's X timeline for this one. Mainly to get my husband no board since he doesn't trust anyone but Trump.
#j.d. vance#president donald trump#2024 presidential election#2024 election#vice president#trump skeptic#voting record#politics#news
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
That was exhausting
#didn’t plan on watching the debate tonight#bc i had it scheduled to record#since i was planning on working on my lit reviews for school#but alas#presidential debate#us politics#skys post
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
#deficits#national debt#Donald Trump#Biden administration#tax cuts#fiscal responsibility#chart#spending#scorecard#Presidential record
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
I think people need more faith in the d20 gang to tell a interesting story. Yah the bad kids are having a rough time rn, thats how conflict works. Like yes absolutely Fabian could pay for Riz to go to college. And he would. But thats not a story that takes 2 months to develop, its not interesting
#presidential address#for the record also i dont think riz would accept it#coming from someone in a very similar situation#fhjy
26 notes
·
View notes
Text
who's gonna tell tumblr that public figures saying violence is bad isn't "centrist" it's just how our culture expects decent people to behave when someone is nearly (or actually) assassinated
edit: oh and yes, everyone, people can care about the state of US politics *and* the state of the world! imagine! making a statement about this does not mean people don't care about violence overseas!
FUCK I'm tired
#adventures in text posts#sorry but you're going to hear it from the leftiest of lefties in the public eye#y'all are deep in the echo chamber if you think 'people shouldn't try to assassinate presidential candidates' is a shitty take#I don't like the guy either but you gotta think bigger#also yeah I'll go on record: assassination is morally wrong and a fucking mess for any political system it happens in#yes even if it's a dictator#jesus. read a book.
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
A very gentle example of Lyndon B. Johnson using the "Johnson Treatment" in a conversation with Texas Congressman Albert Thomas on December 20, 1963, less than a month after LBJ assumed the Presidency following President Kennedy's assassination.
#History#Lyndon B. Johnson#LBJ#President Johnson#Presidents#Presidential History#Johnson Treatment#LBJ Library#LBJ Foundation#Albert Thomas#Congress#Congressional Relations#Politics#Presidency#LBJ Tapes#Presidential Recordings#Presidential Phone Calls#Youtube
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
i swear i tried to watch the debate, i just couldn’t. i had to full on leave my house and go on a walk because trumps arguments were so bad.
#gonna watch a recording of it later probably#but not right now#presidential debate#us politics#thechaosghost
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
It is INSANE to me how yall (referring to the media and a large swath of mainstream public opinion, not my beautiful mutuals) are blaming Jill Biden for Joe's disastrous debate last week and his ongoing candidacy. First of all, for all we know, she could be urging him to drop out behind closed doors, but of course they have to put up a united front publicly even if they're having those conversations in private. Secondly, when has the media ever given a First Lady credit when the President does something good? Or is acknowledging the First Lady's relevance only reserved for when something goes wrong? It's amazing how many people are putting this all on her rather than Joe himself and his entire campaign team.
#i typed this and saved it to drafts several days ago#i know biden has since doubled down on his candidacy#but i'm still really bothered by this “shame on jill” stuff#so i felt the need to dig this out of drafts#for the record i have tremendous sympathy for the situation joe biden is in right now#and if he runs against trump i will vote for him#but i don't think he can win#us politics#presidential debate#politics#jill biden#joe biden#feminism#old man yells at cloud
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Harris Public Lands Policy - What We Might Expect
By and large, the track record of the Biden-Harris contrasts with the Trump administration record and the 2025 Project outline as it relates to public lands. For decades, the federal government has prioritized oil and gas drilling, hardrock mining and livestock grazing on public lands across the country (for that reason, some have referred to the BLM as the Bureau of Logging and Mining). The Biden administration recently issued a far-reaching Interior Department rule that puts conservation, recreation and renewable energy development on equal footing with resource extraction.
This represents a huge shift in the management of roughly 245 million acres of public property — about one-tenth of the nation’s land mass. The extent to which this change will withstand the inevitable legal challenges from fossil fuel industry groups and Republican officials is unclear. It will be intensely contested.
It does open the door for the BLM to auction off “restoration leases” and “mitigation leases” to entities with plans to restore or conserve public lands.
The Biden administration has conserved more than 41 million acres of land and water. This includes restoration of some of the National Monuments reduced under the Trump administration (Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante, and Northeast Canyons and Seamounts National Monuments). He also cancelled the leases granted by the Trump administration to explore for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve.
Biden also established a national goal to conserve at least 30 percent of U.S. lands and freshwater and 30 percent of U.S. ocean areas by 2030, in an initiative commonly referred to as 30x30. This is an ambitious initiative that has received significant pushback as a government 'land grab'.
Although Biden has disappointed some in the environmental movement, the Biden-Harris administration has acknowledged that climate change is real and requires action, has significant achievements in land and water conservation, and has undone a number of the Trump administration decisions.
Whether Harris would continue this trend is likely but not a certainty. However, in her campaign speeches she has been pragmatic but aggressive in her support for the environment and careful stewardship of natural resources. And Walz has promoted a $2B initiative to help the State of Minnesota reduce its carbon footprint.
Although the Trump administration does have to its credit the Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA), the legacy of Trump is one that should be of concern to most of us who love the PCT, the wilderness, and are concerned about our climate. In looking at the record of both candidates, it seems clear based upon their respective records and stated plans, that it is very important that you get out and vote . . . and consider carefully the Trump and the Harris commitment to caring for the planet and how they fit with your values.
It is imperative that those of us who use and love the land, make our voices heard by voting!
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
screaming crying coughing up blood every time i have to fucking defend genocide joe bc ppl wanna lie and say he isn't responsible for most of the best domestic policy we've seen in decades
his foreign policy is dogshit, yes, and he should rightly be called on it and primaried out, but we can criticize the shit he's actually done wrong instead of making shit up about him ~not doing anything good~
#thinking about the keystone pipeline shutdown and how fully 2/3 of the people he appointed to legislative systems were women and poc#thinking about student debt forgiveness and rejoining the paris climate accord and unfucking some of the extreme gerrymandering#and improving COVID protections (that were roundly thrown out by corporate america which is its own concern yes but like. he's not a king)#'biden didn't fix' blah blah blah he's not a fucking dictator he can't actually do whatever he wants. the only thing the GOP lets slide#is the aforementioned dogshit foreign policy bc fuck knows every last republican loves bombing the middle east and supporting israel#(remember that the evangelical xtian death cult requires israel for the apocalypse!! that is a very real fucking thing these ppl strive for#(and evangelicals support the GOP for this very fucking reason. you cannot forget this. we are all fighting for all our goddamn lives rn)#stirring up trouble#i hate biden i hate his foreign policy i hate how ok he is with fascism i hate most of his pre-presidential voting record BUT#i will not let that hate blind me to the reality that he is Objectively Miles Ahead Of Any Fucking Republican Alternative#i still want his ass primaried out of the presidential race so hard he physically blacks out upon seeing the polling results tho#and fuck. at least the dem side seems to have a lot of good progressive downballot candidates this time around already.
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
TikTok set to be banned in the US after losing appeal
See More.....
#was the culmination of extensive#bipartisan action by the Congress and by successive presidents#carefully crafted to deal only with control by a foreign adversary#and it was part of a broader effort to counter a well-substantiated national security threat posed by the PRC (People's Republic of China).#But TikTok said it was not the end of its legal fight.#a TikTok spokesperson said in a statement.#They added that the law was based on#and a ban would censor US citizens.#Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 US Presidential Election may also present a lifeline for the app.#Despite unsuccessfully attempting to ban TikTok during his first term in 2020#he said in the run-up to the November elections he would not allow the ban on TikTok to take effect.#When and why could the US ban TikTok?#Is TikTok really a danger to the West?#Trump will be inaugurated on 20 January - the day after the law says TikTok must be be banned or sold.#However#it remains to be seen whether he will follow through on his pre-election vow.#Professor James Grimmelmann of Cornell University said the president-elect would be “swimming upstream to give TikTok a reprieve”.#TikTok's bid to overturn a law which would see it banned or sold in the US from early 2025 has been rejected.#The social media company had hoped a federal appeals court would agree with its argument that the law was unconstitutional because it repre#But the court upheld the law#which it said .#TikTok says it will now take its fight to the US Supreme Court#the country's highest legal authority.#The US wants TikTok sold or banned because of what it says are its owners links to the Chinese state - links TikTok and parent company Byte#The court agreed the law was The Supreme Court has an established historical record of protecting Americans' right to free speech#and we expect they will do just that on this important constitutional issue#inaccurate#flawed and hypothetical informationThe anti-China sentiment in the US Congress is very strong#so there are now substantial constituencies in both parties that want TikTok to be restricted from the US market#" he told BBC News.
2 notes
·
View notes