Tumgik
#Mother of Invention
Text
“If an individual female worker was bad at something, it was proof that womankind as a whole should be paid less. Just look - these womenfolk can't do the job like a man!
But now, simultaneously, the exact opposite was being argued: if a female worker was good at something, it was proof that women should be paid less. Whatever her aptitude for the task, it was taken as proof of why she should earn less money. The trick was always to define anything a woman excelled at as a ‘naturally feminine attribute'. She simply couldn't help but have a biological knack for closing the toes of silk stockings, programming computers or looking after the elderly.
It isn't uncommon for society to fall back on this reasoning when it comes to careers in elderly care and childcare. We see women come into these jobs and do them well without a great deal of formal training. So we take that as proof that the jobs are "low skilled' and therefore shouldn't be well remunerated. If, on the other hand, a man is 'naturally good at some-thing, it often becomes an argument for the exact opposite: for why he should be paid well.
In those nineteenth-century hosiery factories, much was said about the male workers' 'skills. The female workers, meanwhile, were described in terms of 'speed' and 'accuracy, and the tasks they excelled at were presented as an extension of their nature. They remained passive objects that merely happened to have quick or accurate fingers. Bodies that all but worked by themselves.
The man, meanwhile, was an active participant in his work in a quite different way. He learned things and became 'skilled'. So it comes as no surprise that economic logic promptly demanded that he also be better paid.”
- Katrine Marçal; Mother of Invention
76 notes · View notes
aidenpriceless · 2 years
Note
I've heard that there's a sauna on the MOI, but I can't find it. Is it a restricted access area?
It has been under maintenance ever since the accident.
2 notes · View notes
bloodmaarked · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
➳ monthly book round-up: june
read:
mother of invention, katrine marçal. 2*. read 28 may 2023 – 10 june 2023.
spare, prince harry. 5*. read 28 may 2023 – 11 june 2023.
big shot, jeff kinney. 3*. read 11 june 2023 – 14 june 2023.
the hate u give, angie thomas. 4*. read 12 june 2023 - 14 june 2023.
the missing american, kwei quartey. 1*. read 16 june 2023 - 22 june 2023.
the year of the witching, alexis henderson. 4*. read 16 june 2023 - 26 june 2023.
currently reading:
foul lady fortune, chloe gong. started 15 june 2023.
a deadly education, naomi novik. started 26 june 2023.
1 note · View note
hitchell-mope · 2 years
Text
Oh dear
0 notes
jamisonrivv · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
zappa ⭐️
480 notes · View notes
undergroundrockpress · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Joshua Light Show / the Mothers Of Invention at the Fillmore Auditorium (San Francisco) in 1967.
236 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Frank Zappa, Mothers of Invention, BB King, 1968
123 notes · View notes
mndvx · 2 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
77 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 1 month
Text
Wild how we know that Elizabeth Woodville was officially appointed to royal councils in her own right during her husband’s reign and fortified the Tower of London in preparation of a siege while 8-months pregnant and had forces gathering at Westminster “in the queen’s name” in 1483 – only for NONE of these things to be even included, let alone explored, in the vast majority of scholarship and historical novels involving her.
#lol I don't remember writing this - I found it when I was searching for something else in my drafts. But it's 100% true so I had to post it.#elizabeth woodville#my post#Imo this is mainly because Elizabeth's negative historiography has always involved both vilification and diminishment in equal measure.#and because her brand of vilification (femme fatale; intriguer) suggests more indirect/“feminine” than legitimate/forceful types of power#It's still bizarre though-you'd think these would be some of the most famous & defining aspects of Elizabeth's life. But apparently not#I guess she only matters when it comes to marrying Edward and Promoting Her Family and scheming against Richard#There is very lacking interest in her beyond those things even in her traditionally negative depictions#And most of her “reassessments” tend to do diminish her so badly she's rendered utterly irrelevant and almost pathetic by the end of it#Even when some of these things *are* mentioned they're never truly emphasized as they should be.#See: her formal appointment in royal councils. It was highly unconventional + entirely unprecedented for queens in the 14th & 15th century#You'd think this would be incredibly important and highlighted when analyzing late medieval queenship in England but apparently not#Historians are more willing to straight-up INVENT positions & roles for so many other late medieval queens/king's mothers that didn't exist#(not getting into this right now it's too long...)#But somehow acknowledging and discussing Elizabeth's ACTUAL formally appointed role is too much for them I guess#She's either subsumed into the general vilification of her family (never mind that they were known as 'the queen's kin' to actual#contemporaries; they were defined by HER not the other way around) or she's rendered utterly insignificant by historians. Often both.#But at the end of the day her individual role and identity often overlooked or downplayed in both scenarios#and ofc I've said this before but - there has literally never been a proper reassessment of Elizabeth's role in 1483-85 TILL DATE#despite the fact that it's such a sensational and well-known time period in medieval England#This isn't even a Wars of the Roses thing. Both Margaret of Anjou and Margaret Beaufort have had multiple different reassessments#of their roles and positions during their respective crises/upheavals by now;#There is simply a distinct lack of interest in reassessing Elizabeth in a similar way and I think this needs to be acknowledged.#Speaking of which - there's also a persistent habit of analyzing her through the context of Margaret of Anjou or Elizabeth of York#(either as a parallel or a foil) rather than as a historical figure in HER OWN RIGHT#that's also too long to get into I just wanted to point it out because I hate it and I think it's utterly senseless#I've so much to say about how all of this affects her portrayal in historical fiction as well but that's going into a whole other tangent#anyway- I am forever judging historical/fictional books that center around or heavily involve Elizabeth which do not highlight these things#ofc there are other things but these in particular *really* frustrate me#just felt like ranting a bit in the tags because these are all things that I want to individually discuss someday with proper posts...
76 notes · View notes
meirimerens · 1 year
Text
the pathologic Kin is largely fictionalized with a created language that takes from multiple sources to be its own, a cosmogony & spirituality that does not correlate to the faiths (mostly Tengrist & Buddhist) practiced by the peoples it takes inspirations from, has customs, mores and roles invented for the purposes of the game, and even just a style of dress that does not resemble any of these peoples', but it is fascinating looking into specifically to me the sigils and see where they come from... watch this:
P2 Layers glyphs take from the mongolian script:
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
while the in-game words for Blood, Bones and Nerves are mongolian directly, it is interesting to note that their glyphs do not have a phonetic affiliation to the words (ex. the "Yas" layer of Bones having for glyph the equivalent of the letter F, the "Medrel" layer of Nerves having a glyph the equivalent of the letter È,...)
the leatherworks on the Kayura models', with their uses of angles and extending lines, remind me of the Phags Pa Script (used for Tibetan, Mongolian, Chineses, Uyghur language, and others)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
some of the sigils also look either in part or fully inspired by Phags Pa script letters...
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
some look closer to the mongolian or vagindra (buryat) script
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
looking at the Herb Brides & their concept art, we can see bodypainting that looks like vertical buryat or mongolian script (oh hi (crossed out: Mark) Phags Pa script):
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
shaped and reshaped...
#not sure how much. what's the word. bond? involvement? not experience. closeness? anyone in the team has with any of these cultures#but i recall learning lead writer is indigenous in some way & heavily self-inserts as artemy [like. That's His Face used for#the p1 burakh portrait] so i imagine There Is some knowledge; if not first-hand at least in some other way#& i'm not in the team so i don't know how much Whatever is put into Anything#[ + i've ranted about the treatment of the brides Enough. enough i have]#so i don't have any ground to stand on wrt how i would feel about how these cultures are handled to make the Kin somewhat-hodgepodge.#there is recognizing it is Obviously inspired by real-life cultures [with the words;the alphabet;i look at Kayura i know what i see]#& recognizing it Also is. obviously and greatly imagined. not that weird for you know. a story.#like there is No Turkic/Altaic/Mongolic culture that has a caste of all-women spiritual dancers who place a great importance on nudity#as a reflection of the perfect world and do nothing but dance to bring about the harvest. ykwim...#like neither the Mongols nor the Buryats nor the Tibetans dress the way the Kin does. that's cos the Kin is invented. but they're invented.#.. on wide fundations. ykwim......#Tengrism has a Sky Deity (Tengri) with an earth-goddess *daughter* whereas the kin worship an Earth-Goddess mother of everything#+ a huge bull. Buddhism has its own complete cosmogony & beliefs which from the little I know Vastly Differ from anything the Kin believes#like. yeah. story. but also. [holds myself back from renting about the Brides again] shhh...#neigh (blabbers)#pathologic#pathologic 2
292 notes · View notes
Text
“The way we currently describe the history of technology not only excludes women in a primary sense, it also means that our definition of technology has constantly shifted to exclude what women have done. When men knitted stockings it was a respected, technical job; when women did so it was needlework. When women churned butter it was a simple servant's task; when men did so it was a technical operation. When women programmed computers it was considered something anyone could do, but when men did so it suddenly required a very specific type of nerd brain that in all its great genius could neither shower its associated body nor be bothered to show some basic social skills.”
- Katrine Marçal, Mother of Invention
8 notes · View notes
petratherrock · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Guys, water is wet-
110 notes · View notes
quietwingsinthesky · 6 months
Text
i think river and amy try to do some sort of mother-daughter bonding exercise or trip or something exactly one time, and it goes horribly. it's the most uncomfortable thing they've both ever done, and that's saying a lot. they never try to do it again.
110 notes · View notes
bloodmaarked · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
mother of invention, katrine marçal
released 2021
read: 28 may 2023 – 10 june 2023
i initially added this book to my reading list because i heard the author speak for 'the trouble club' as part of the promo for this book - it was an interesting talk as far as i can remember, and she made her points eloquently. (also, highly recommend 'the trouble club' if you're in london and love to hear brilliant women talk about their books and so much more!) at least, she was eloquent enough to convince me to read the book and see what she had to say. unfortunately, mother of invention was a pretty jumbled mess that i had to push myself to finish.
it's a book that takes a feminist look at technological developments throughout human history and looks into the future. interesting in premise, but i had two main problems with this. the first is that the book felt like it meandered all over the place - several times i found myself trying to pick apart what the chapter was themed on and asking myself, "wait, why is she talking about this again?" it could've done with way more editing and a more streamlined approach, as i found myself engaged in shorter sections that could've been published as a short article.
the second issue was that there were many, many moments where it felt like the point was just 'women good, men bad', and this line of thinking was backed up with... not evidence, but just the author's personal thoughts, i guess? i was lost when she made claims such as climate change is happening because we see nature as feminine and therefore feel we can abuse it like we do women. like, do you have a source for this or is this just how you feel? a lot of the writing felt very biased and, i felt, took credibility from her whole argument.
the book wasn't awful but overall i wouldn't go out of my way to recommend this. a little disappointing.
rating: ⭐️⭐️
1 note · View note
hitchell-mope · 2 years
Text
Oh Tigger
0 notes
frigidwife · 18 days
Text
Tumblr media
42 notes · View notes