“If an individual female worker was bad at something, it was proof that womankind as a whole should be paid less. Just look - these womenfolk can't do the job like a man!
But now, simultaneously, the exact opposite was being argued: if a female worker was good at something, it was proof that women should be paid less. Whatever her aptitude for the task, it was taken as proof of why she should earn less money. The trick was always to define anything a woman excelled at as a ‘naturally feminine attribute'. She simply couldn't help but have a biological knack for closing the toes of silk stockings, programming computers or looking after the elderly.
It isn't uncommon for society to fall back on this reasoning when it comes to careers in elderly care and childcare. We see women come into these jobs and do them well without a great deal of formal training. So we take that as proof that the jobs are "low skilled' and therefore shouldn't be well remunerated. If, on the other hand, a man is 'naturally good at some-thing, it often becomes an argument for the exact opposite: for why he should be paid well.
In those nineteenth-century hosiery factories, much was said about the male workers' 'skills. The female workers, meanwhile, were described in terms of 'speed' and 'accuracy, and the tasks they excelled at were presented as an extension of their nature. They remained passive objects that merely happened to have quick or accurate fingers. Bodies that all but worked by themselves.
The man, meanwhile, was an active participant in his work in a quite different way. He learned things and became 'skilled'. So it comes as no surprise that economic logic promptly demanded that he also be better paid.”
- Katrine Marçal; Mother of Invention
76 notes
·
View notes
I've heard that there's a sauna on the MOI, but I can't find it. Is it a restricted access area?
It has been under maintenance ever since the accident.
2 notes
·
View notes
➳ monthly book round-up: june
read:
mother of invention, katrine marçal. 2*. read 28 may 2023 – 10 june 2023.
spare, prince harry. 5*. read 28 may 2023 – 11 june 2023.
big shot, jeff kinney. 3*. read 11 june 2023 – 14 june 2023.
the hate u give, angie thomas. 4*. read 12 june 2023 - 14 june 2023.
the missing american, kwei quartey. 1*. read 16 june 2023 - 22 june 2023.
the year of the witching, alexis henderson. 4*. read 16 june 2023 - 26 june 2023.
currently reading:
foul lady fortune, chloe gong. started 15 june 2023.
a deadly education, naomi novik. started 26 june 2023.
1 note
·
View note
The Joshua Light Show / the Mothers Of Invention at the Fillmore Auditorium (San Francisco) in 1967.
236 notes
·
View notes
Frank Zappa, Mothers of Invention, BB King, 1968
123 notes
·
View notes
the pathologic Kin is largely fictionalized with a created language that takes from multiple sources to be its own, a cosmogony & spirituality that does not correlate to the faiths (mostly Tengrist & Buddhist) practiced by the peoples it takes inspirations from, has customs, mores and roles invented for the purposes of the game, and even just a style of dress that does not resemble any of these peoples', but it is fascinating looking into specifically to me the sigils and see where they come from... watch this:
P2 Layers glyphs take from the mongolian script:
while the in-game words for Blood, Bones and Nerves are mongolian directly, it is interesting to note that their glyphs do not have a phonetic affiliation to the words (ex. the "Yas" layer of Bones having for glyph the equivalent of the letter F, the "Medrel" layer of Nerves having a glyph the equivalent of the letter È,...)
the leatherworks on the Kayura models', with their uses of angles and extending lines, remind me of the Phags Pa Script (used for Tibetan, Mongolian, Chineses, Uyghur language, and others)
some of the sigils also look either in part or fully inspired by Phags Pa script letters...
some look closer to the mongolian or vagindra (buryat) script
looking at the Herb Brides & their concept art, we can see bodypainting that looks like vertical buryat or mongolian script (oh hi (crossed out: Mark) Phags Pa script):
shaped and reshaped...
292 notes
·
View notes
“The way we currently describe the history of technology not only excludes women in a primary sense, it also means that our definition of technology has constantly shifted to exclude what women have done. When men knitted stockings it was a respected, technical job; when women did so it was needlework. When women churned butter it was a simple servant's task; when men did so it was a technical operation. When women programmed computers it was considered something anyone could do, but when men did so it suddenly required a very specific type of nerd brain that in all its great genius could neither shower its associated body nor be bothered to show some basic social skills.”
- Katrine Marçal, Mother of Invention
8 notes
·
View notes
mother of invention, katrine marçal
released 2021
read: 28 may 2023 – 10 june 2023
i initially added this book to my reading list because i heard the author speak for 'the trouble club' as part of the promo for this book - it was an interesting talk as far as i can remember, and she made her points eloquently. (also, highly recommend 'the trouble club' if you're in london and love to hear brilliant women talk about their books and so much more!) at least, she was eloquent enough to convince me to read the book and see what she had to say. unfortunately, mother of invention was a pretty jumbled mess that i had to push myself to finish.
it's a book that takes a feminist look at technological developments throughout human history and looks into the future. interesting in premise, but i had two main problems with this. the first is that the book felt like it meandered all over the place - several times i found myself trying to pick apart what the chapter was themed on and asking myself, "wait, why is she talking about this again?" it could've done with way more editing and a more streamlined approach, as i found myself engaged in shorter sections that could've been published as a short article.
the second issue was that there were many, many moments where it felt like the point was just 'women good, men bad', and this line of thinking was backed up with... not evidence, but just the author's personal thoughts, i guess? i was lost when she made claims such as climate change is happening because we see nature as feminine and therefore feel we can abuse it like we do women. like, do you have a source for this or is this just how you feel? a lot of the writing felt very biased and, i felt, took credibility from her whole argument.
the book wasn't awful but overall i wouldn't go out of my way to recommend this. a little disappointing.
rating: ⭐️⭐️
1 note
·
View note