#Media and Cultural Influence

[martyrbat]

theyre trying to dehydrate our beautiful bears and make them have a six pack.... i feel sick.

[odinsblog]

And you know that there are many journalists who are very concerned about the pressure that's being applied about the sensitivities of this conflict.

And let's just be very clear here. We have the Israeli government, has a lot of supporters in Congress, has a lot of supporters in the media, has a lot of supporters in activist groups on K Street. There is a, quote unquote, pro-Israel lobby which does apply pressure on media organizations.

If you've worked like I have, both in American media and British media, you've seen the emails from honestreporting .com, and Kamera. And some of these groups your listeners may never have heard of. But I'll tell you what, every newsroom has heard of these groups; “Why is your headline this,” and “Why is your reporter showing bias?”And, “Why do they tweet this?” In this recent case, it's Louisa Lovelock, who is a British journalist at the Washington Post. It's a fantastic Middle East correspondence. Covered Syria, covered Iraq, covered Gaza, covered a bunch of things.

It's so absurd, the dossier they've produced against her. One of the things they go after is she took part in student protests at university in England against tuition fees. And..? A) that's a bad thing? B) that means she can't cover Israel's bombing of Gaza? It's so absurd. The stuff that they pull with me. Of course, I've had stuff going back 20 or 30 years that they've thrown at me. And it's a real problem where people get intimidated into not saying, not speaking what they want to speak about.

And we live in a world where the right is obsessed about cancel culture and free speech when, let's be very clear, the greatest victims of, quote unquote, cancel culture in this country have always been Palestinian activists, both on campus, in the media, and in politics.

I mean, let's just be clear, we have a Congress filled with white supremacists. We have a guy, I think, Andy Ogles from Tennessee, this week who was caught on tape saying, “Kill them all.” Alright? None of these guys get any attention. No votes of censure. Who is the only member of Congress who's been censured since October the 7th? The one Palestinian woman.

So let's just be very clear who the victims of, quote unquote, cancel culture and suppression and intimidation are. It tends to be people who speak out on behalf of Palestinians. And that's the case with reporters who aren't even taking positions. They're just reporting what they're seeing, and what they're seeing of course, is not favorable to the Israeli narrative, because what they're seeing is mass starvation. What they're seeing are mass killings. What they're seeing are kids being pulled out from the rubble. And, of course, that doesn't help the Israeli narratives.

—Mehdi Hasan, on ‘cancel culture’ and how journalists and reporters are attacked for simply reporting the truth about Gaza 🇵🇸

[roomba-mangga]

historians in my podcasts repeatedly asserting that medieval conceptions of childhood were vastly different in that teenagers as young as 14 were already given adult responsibilities (especially if they were royalty) if not considered legal adults depending on the time period and this is just feeding my headcanon that yaad and thistle don't see themselves as children

[hussyknee]

I'm really not a villain enjoyer. I love anti-heroes and anti-villains. But I can't see fictional evil separate from real evil. As in not that enjoying dark fiction means you condone it, but that all fiction holds up some kind of mirror to the world as it is. Killing innocent people doesn't make you an iconic lesbian girlboss it just makes you part of the mundane and stultifying black rot of the universe.

"But characters struggling with honour and goodness and the egoism of being good are so boring." Cool well some of us actually struggle with that stuff on the daily because being a good person is complicated and harder than being an edgelord.

Sure you can use fiction to explore the darkness of human nature and learn empathy, but the world doesn't actually suffer from a deficit of empathy for powerful and privileged people who do heinous stuff. You could literally kill a thousand babies in broad daylight and they'll find a way to blame your childhood trauma for it as long as you're white, cisgender, abled and attractive, and you'll be their poor little meow meow by the end of the week. Don't act like you're advocating for Quasimodo when you're just making Elon Musk hot, smart and gay.

[artist-issues]

yes I'm a Christian writer. Yes I'm a Christian artist. Yes I'm a Christian whatever--I'm so tired of people being like "I'm not a Christian ___, I'm actually a ______ who is Christian" what?!? No! Say the "Christian" part of my identification louder, it's the only part that matters.

I have been crucified with Christ, therefore it is no longer I who live! No longer I who put pen to paper! No longer I who type! No longer I who thinks and plans and practices and works and communicates--it's Christ who lives in me! He must increase! I must decrease!

If you're a Christian, knock that bogus worldly self-centered crap about "no I'm not part of the 'Christian genre' so I'm not a 'Christian whatever,' because I want to be taken seriously," off. Knock it off, shut up, get out of here with that.

Who cares if you're taken seriously? Who are you doing this for? For others? For Christ? Or just for you and your own credit and your own status? Get away from me with that. Ugh.

Anything you do in your life is supposed to be for Christ. You died. You said He was in charge of you from now on--You said He was the sum total of your identity, from now on. Did you mean it? Or did you mean, "everything except my special interests and career?" Of course not.

Anything you do in your life is supposed to be for Christ. That includes your art, your music, your hobby, your writing, your job. You should be so fortunate, so favored, to be called a "Christian" anything. You're not identifying with the "Christian genre," you're identifying with Christ. The word Christian doesn't mean "little Skillet" or "little Frank Peretti" or "little Dallas Jenkins." The word Christian means "little Christ."

You should be so fortunate to be called "Christian" anything, like the disciples were beside themselves with joy to be called "Christian" prisoners and "Christian" slaves. Because they got to be associated with Christ.

Get out of here. Honestly.

[themousefromfantasyland]

I miss when "Wokeness" was popular on social media.

It was always fake and made to gain popularity online rather than to provoke systemic change, but at least it was based on ideals of self expression, of fighting oppression, and of caring for someone else besides yourself.

This new wave of social media influencers terrifies me. These fitness gurus, these tradwives, these edgy comedians, and these manosphere influencers - they are all based on a extreme form of conformism and selfishness.

It's so tragic how Gen Z seems obsessed with conforming to extreme gender roles and beauty standards.

If the 2010's were marked by "I'm a special snowflake", the 2020's are being marked by "I have to conform to societal expectations by all means necessary".

@ariel-seagull-wings @the-blue-fairie @mask131 @princesssarisa

[skeletonvintage]

These are the same people who keep saying that the voice actors don’t need to look like their characters.

Like is there any actual critiques about this show or are there a pandemic of people needing to go outside and socialize?

Also how desperate are you for views that you need a photoshop version of the actress’ breasts to get attention.

[itspileofgoodthings]

when will Catholic Instagram influencers realize they can’t “sis you are infinitely worthy” their way out of everything

[beingatoaster]

I'm constantly torn between "a private internet life their parents don't know about is good and even life-saving for a lot of kids" and "kids should not be exposed to the modern internet unsupervised" and the only answer I can think of is to bring back Voyforums

[cator99]

I always get detained at da border because PROFUNC never ended but basically I'm like if a targeted individual didn't even care

[netscapenavigator-official]

I honestly couldn’t handle being an influencer. I’m already on Tumblr, the place where nothing matters, and I’m like “wait I can’t post this. 😰 What if the mutuals think it’s cringe and unfollow me.” If there were actually stakes and money involved I’d have imploded a long time ago.

[skateintoawall]

Every time a bsd chapter comes out I see everyone posting about asagiri killing characters or the wild things that are happening and I’m just over here kicking my feet back and forth waiting to see a character have a mental breakdown on the battlefield

[doyouknowthisdragartist]

I take a liberal approach to what qualifies as drag, but the tl;dr of it is that my criteria for whether a performance is drag are: queerness (the essential ingredient!), performativity, emphasis on visual cohesion, a strong sense of irony/affinity for the deviant (from queer to queer y'know) and last but not least if it would be really funny to categorize them as a drag artist

[omegaphilosophia]

The Evolution of Idea Dissemination: From Tradition to the Digital Age

The way ideas spread today differs significantly from the past due to advancements in technology, communication methods, and societal structures. Here are some key contrasts:

1. Speed of Dissemination

Past: Ideas spread slowly, often taking years or decades to reach wide audiences. They relied on oral traditions, handwritten manuscripts, or physical transportation of printed materials.

Present: Ideas can spread instantaneously through the internet, social media, and global communication networks.

2. Accessibility

Past: Access to new ideas was limited to certain groups, such as the educated elite, clergy, or ruling classes.

Present: Most individuals with internet access can share, access, and contribute to the spread of ideas, making the process more democratic.

3. Scale and Reach

Past: Ideas spread regionally or through specific trade routes and cultural exchanges.

Present: Ideas have global reach, transcending borders and cultural boundaries in seconds.

4. Gatekeepers

Past: Dissemination was controlled by gatekeepers like monarchs, religious authorities, publishers, or academic institutions.

Present: While gatekeepers (media platforms, algorithms) still exist, the decentralized nature of the internet allows individuals to bypass traditional controls.

5. Forms of Communication

Past: Ideas were communicated through spoken word, art, or written texts (letters, books).

Present: Multimedia formats (videos, memes, podcasts) and interactive platforms facilitate dynamic and engaging forms of communication.

6. Authenticity and Misinformation

Past: Ideas often underwent rigorous scrutiny before widespread acceptance due to slower dissemination.

Present: The rapid spread of ideas increases the risk of misinformation and lack of critical vetting.

7. Virality

Past: Ideas spread through deliberate networks, requiring effort and planning to reach new audiences.

Present: Social media algorithms and viral phenomena allow ideas to spread rapidly without intentional promotion.

8. Collaboration and Feedback

Past: Collaboration on ideas often required physical proximity or slow correspondence.

Present: Online platforms enable real-time collaboration, feedback, and adaptation of ideas globally.

9. Personalization

Past: The same message was often disseminated broadly with little tailoring to individual preferences.

Present: Algorithms personalize the spread of ideas, tailoring content to individual tastes, biases, and interests.

10. Longevity

Past: Ideas often endured longer due to limited new information and the slower pace of societal change.

Present: Ideas can have shorter lifespans, quickly replaced by newer concepts in the fast-paced information ecosystem.

Implications

This shift in how ideas spread affects everything from politics and culture to education and economics, creating both opportunities for innovation and challenges like misinformation and polarization. The immediacy and interconnectedness of modern communication reshape how society processes and adapts to new ideas.

[eyescllsed]

my twitter account is private so i thought i'd have more luck with a poll here!