#Lyves

[lunaprimera]

🖤

[com4tableinyourskin]

WHEN SPARKS FLY

[Lyves]

"It's been two years, I keep calling

I'm standing here and I ain't got you. As we lay here, lovers in arms. I can feel your fear, can this love be true? Come on, lift me up, love, I keep falling. I'm losing faith 'cause you keep stalling. Lift me up, love, I keep falling. I'm losing faith 'cause you keep stalling"

[spockette11a2b]

Je me sens vide.

C’est bizarre, tu te dis ce n’est que des youtubers, tu ne les as jamais rencontré, et puis ce n’est pas comme si ils arrêtaient tout. Et pourtant, ça me touche beaucoup cette annonce. Voilà Vilebrequin c’est fini!

Peut-être que c’est la soudaineté de l’annonce qui me donne cette impression d’abandon. Une semaine ils prennent un rond point à 130 et celle d’après, ils disent au revoir. Comme ça, sans préavis, sans indication au préalable.

Je ne leur en veux pas, ce n’est pas une critique. En vrai, je comprends leurs décisions. J’ai toujours détesté les séries qui ne savent pas s’arrêter à temps (looking at you spn).

Et honnêtement, après le 1er gp et le mondial de l’auto ça s’est vu que Sylvain était à bout. Surtout dans la vidéo où ils ont fait voler la voiture. J’avoue que je ne sais pas si cette vidéo a été tournée avant ou après le gp, mais ça m’a vraiment marqué de voir Sylvain dans cet état où tu sentais qu’il tirait sur la corde.

Ce qui me manque aussi avec cette annonce, c’est la réaction des gens. Je m’attendais a un peu plus de bruit du côté d’autres youtubeurs mais à part Etienne Moustache, j’ai rien vu passer pour les saluer. Ok ils sont pas mort et ils s’arrêtent pas d’être présent sur les réseaux, mais quand même, ça manque de réaction envers Vilebrequin en tant que soi.

Après comme j’ai toujours beaucoup été dans des fandoms actifs où dès qu’il se passe quelque chose on en entend parler pendant 3 jours, c’est plus dur d’accepter la chose quand je vois pas de réaction d’autres personnes…

Bref tout ça pour dire, qu’ils auront été une hyper fixation pendant presque 2 ans (bien que je les regardais avant mais je suis devenue vraiment fan qu’il y a 2 ans) et que maintenant il n’y aura plus rien. J’ai du mal à m’y faire. Ça m’a bien mis un coup sur la tête. Comme une rupture qu’on voit pas venir ou comme arriver à la fin totalement inattendu d’un bon livre, il y a cette espèce de dépression « post bonne chose », à laquelle il faut un peu de temps avant de pouvoir s’y faire. Là c’est pareil, je vais avoir besoin de temps pour digérer la nouvelle et pouvoir passer à autre chose…

[kawaiiobessions]

love/lyte! spc hospital patient (sadly >-<) crushin on doom n unii!! taken! :3 ... rentry!

ooc: ref sheets n shit

[dustedmagazine]

Strapping Fieldhands — LYVE: IN CONCERTE (ever/never)

LYVE: IN CONCERTE by Strapping Fieldhands

When we reminisce about 1990s lo-fi, we usually stick to the well-behaved parts, like Pavement’s hyper-articulate guitar meanderings or Guided By Voices brash but lyrical pop or Jon Spencer Blues Explosion’s archly feral soul vamp.  We are less apt to reflect on the unhinged and unstrung glories of the Strapping Fieldhands, captured here in all its Clinton-era heyday.  Untuned, unshaven and untrammeled, they made art-damaged garage like a pack of zombies, though, admittedly, these zombies could rock.

This compilation captures seven performances from the Strapping Fieldhands prime mid-1990s run, recorded at various American venues by various people.  The band is cagey about exactly where and when the tapes were laid down, though you can hear Bob Malloy thanking Mike Rep and the people of Columbus at the end of one late album track.  In any case, the disc includes roughhousing favorites from Discus (1994), the In the Pineys EP (1994) and the singles comp Gobs on the Midway, in addition to a few that don’t turn up on any of the records. The difference, of course, is that they are live, raucous and desperate and clinging to reason by a dirty fingernail. There’s a shamanic quality to these cuts, as if you could open a portal to otherness with a howl and a blast of fuzz guitar, and who knows, maybe you can?

“Red Dog the Deconstructor,” for example, is extremely well-named, since sets up the clanging, banging contours of a primitive rock song, then blasts them into dissonant oblivion. There’s a verse and a chorus, and a dippy, tiptoe-through-the-tulips psychedelic break jammed into this song, but mostly there’s the junk shop entropy of machinery rolling down a hill, shedding parts as it goes.  “Arrogant Flower” wails and flails at the disc’s most memorable hook, pounding it with meat hammers until it falls about at the joint.  Malloy spits in Spanish for a second or two, then keens out a chorus of “Hey you arrogant flower.”  

I find that the music gets more enjoyable as it goes, cresting with “Sad Lament of the American Indian,” the chaos stitched together with a bass line as sinewy as tendon, and winding down with the bent, woozy lyricism of “I Don’t Know Why.”  I’m still not sure if the music is actually better or it just takes me that long to get acclimated.  Either way, it sinks its hooks in slowly, so that you hardly notice it’s stopped hurting.  

Jennifer Kelly

[lyvevn]

25+ thực phẩm giúp tóc mọc nhanh, dày, cực hiệu quả

Mái tóc bóng khỏe và mượt mà là mục tiêu mà nhiều người hằng ao ước. Không chỉ cần chăm sóc tóc từ bên ngoài, việc duy trì một chế độ ăn uống đầy đủ và cân bằng cũng vô cùng quan trọng để nuôi dưỡng tóc từ bên trong, thúc đẩy sự phát triển của tóc và ngăn chặn các vấn đề về tóc. Vậy bạn nên bổ sung những loại thực phẩm nào để tăng cường sức khỏe cho mái tóc? Trong bài viết này, cùng Lyve khám phá những thực phẩm giàu dinh dưỡng được các chuyên gia khuyên dùng, giúp bạn sở hữu mái tóc đẹp một cách tự nhiên.

[jameslealyve]

[jameslyve]

[bardowelle]

Playing around with coloring and stuff, having a good time

[jezabelofthenorth]

Portrait of Anne of Cleves, Hans Holbein the Younger

1539

Lourve Museum, Paris

Holbein was sent to paint her at Düren in summer 1539, so that Henry could appraise her as a possible wife. Holbein posed Anne square-on and in elaborate finery.  Henry was disappointed with her in the flesh, and he divorced her after a brief, unconsummated marriage. He redesignated Anne as "king's sister", and she remained in England, where she died during the reign of Queen Mary

The use of parchment suggests that Holbein painted, or at least began, the portrait in Düren. A miniature version in the Victoria and Albert Museum was probably painted at the same time. Holbein also produced a portrait of Anne's sister, Amelia, which is now lost. Nicholas Wotton, the head of the English delegation, reported to Henry: "Your Grace's servant Hanze Albein hathe taken th'effigies of my lady Anne and the lady Amelye and hath expressed theyr images very lyvely". The tradition that Holbein flattered Anne is not borne out by the evidence: no one except Henry ever described her as repugnant.

[we-staybhaalin]

Was tagged by @razrogue (thank you!! ^^)

Color - Crimson Flora - Hibiscus Fauna - Red Fox Object - Lute Song - No Love by Lyves Feeling - Confidence

I used this template!

[spockette11a2b]

Moi après avoir regardé leur dernière vidéo

😭😭 (x)

[edwardseymour]

I noticed when you wrote about John Seymour, you didn’t mention that whole having an affair with his daughter in law. What are your thoughts on that?

???

my opinion is that i have doubts that it happened that way. i think it’s engaging, if bleak, content for a fictional portrayal, but i think it’s historical authenticity has been overstated.

what we know is that when katherine’s father died in 1527, he wrote his daughter out of his will (which edward seymour contested with the argument that his father-in-law, william filliol, was not of sound mind: “having many sundry and inconstant fantasies in his latter days”). we might assume she had entered a convent, as she was bequeathed an annuity of £40, which edward had no claim to, “as longe as shee shall lyve vertuously and abide in some honest house of Relegion of wymen. […] Yf my seid doughter do not lyve vertuously and abide in some honest house of religion of wymen to the pleasing of God, then I will that my said doughter have no parcell of the said 40”. so her father wanted her in a convent, but it’s not clear when/if she entered one, as she gave birth to her second child (edward) around 1528-29. so the most we can reliably say is that there was some kind of falling out between katherine and her father, and her father with the seymours.

there’s no evidence that they divorced, and it seems like she died in 1535, thereby freeing edward to remarry. later, a land grant stipulated that edward’s children by his second wife, anne somerset, would be the ones to inherit. katherine’s line should only inherit if anne’s line failed (which is ultimately what happened), and only by the heirs of katherine’s second son, edward (“with contingent remainders in tail male to Edward Seymour, his son by his late wife, Katharine”). katherine’s first son, john, was excluded entirely. as far as i can tell, edward didn’t fully abandon his children by katherine, but nevertheless they were stripped of their inheritance.

it’s not clear why edward may have taken issue with his first marriage or with his first son, john. adultery was only claimed after the fact, by a peter heylyn in 1674 — who in the same claim describes edward as using magic to snoop on his wife, thereby catching her in adultery while away in france. he also got the order of katherine’s sons wrong, so make of that what you will. only a seventeenth century marginal note specifies adultery with her father-in-law, john seymour: “divorced because she was known by his father after the wedding”.

john seymour did father an illegitimate son called john, around 1530. i suppose this has led to some confusion between edward seymour’s illegitimate half-brother, and his son by katherine filliol. there’s no evidence connecting this john to katherine, nor that the two johns are one and the same.

edward and katherine were married in 1514. edward would have been 14. katherine’s age is unknown; she has been estimated to have been born around 1507 — making her around seven at the time of her marriage. but this would have been exceptionally young for the time, so i estimate she was probably older, and closer to edward in age. the two would have been young enough to prompt the arrangement for them to live with john. he would have provided for them, responsible for their “meat, drink, learning and lodging, as apparel convenient for their degree”. additionally, edward was part of princess mary’s (henry’s sister) household, and would be enfant d’honneur at her marriage to louis xii of france in october 1514. there was a stipulation in their marriage contract that the marriage could be dissolved after three years, possibly to account for the time before the couple could consummate the marriage owing to katherine’s age. when their son, john, was born in 1518, edward would have been attending university. katherine would have been only about eleven if the 1507 date holds, but i think it’s possible she was older, and if we assume her to be around the same age as her husband, then she would have been in her late teens. margaret scard muses that john could have been fathered by katherine’s father-in-law — “a possibility since Katherine lived in the same house as her father-in-law and Edward had been away at university” — but it is purely speculative.

what can be said is that clearly nothing was made of this at the time; considering jane’s subsequent rise, no scandal seems to have been brought up regarding her family. likewise, edward’s career never seems to have been impacted by any connection to a scandal pertaining to his first wife. the seymours were not impacted by any controversy or shame. i think it’s possibly been given too much credence by alison weir, who claimed that “the scandal had shocked even Henry VIII’s courtiers”, but in actuality there’s nothing to suggest the court cared about edward’s first marriage, or about the quasi-incestuous affair — if it even took place. it has been used as an explanation for why jane did not marry william dormer, but there is nothing to suggest that john/katherine were a cited issue for the dormers. jane dormer and henry clifford tell us issue was taken with francis bryan’s involvement, and that jane's social rank was not sufficient for william dormer. no other issues with the seymours can be attributed to damaged reputation, certainly not on account of john having a sexual relationship with his daughter-in-law. nor is there any evidence of any discord between john and edward, regardless of elizabeth norton claiming their relationship “would have been irreparably damaged”. the fact that such little was made of it makes me doubt in its veracity, to be honest.