#Industrial crane manufacturer

[dvrknessabides]

Dreamers and Dogs

The Rail Yards, Albuquerque

[wimaccrane]

15 Ton Overhead Cranes For Steel Slabs Handling

IntroductionManufacturing Process of Double Girder Overhead CranesUtilization of Double Girder Overhead Cranes in the Steel IndustryHow to Determine the Price of Your Crane ProjectConclusion Introduction In the world of industrial logistics, efficiency, strength, and reliability are the key characteristics that dictate the quality of equipment. We’re excited to bring forth a prime illustration…

[cheezboat]

Looking for Crane Hoist Manufacturers in India? Ailas Engineered is your trusted manufacturer and supplier, offering high-quality, heavy-duty crane hoists for all industrial applications.

[harsiddhicrane]

Wall Travelling Jib Crane

MOVING MATERIAL RESOURCES SAFELY WITH CARE

Harsiddhi Crane Wall Travelling Jib Cranes Are Available In Capacities Up To 20 T Incorporating The Harsiddhi Crain ZX Wire Rope Hoist Or In Capacities Less Than 5 T Incorporating The Harsiddhi Crain LX Chain Hoist. The Travelling Cantilever Structure With Hook Coverage Over A Continuous Work Area Makes This Type Of Crane Ideal For Servicing A Line Of Machines Or Workstations Especially Where Loads Must Be Moved From One To Another. Wall Travellers Are Ideal For Overlapping Use With Overhead Cranes Where The Travelling Jib Services The Work Stations Down One Side Of A Bay And The Overhead Crane Provides General Service Of The Whole Bay. Generally Speaking Building Structures For Wall Travelling Jib Cranes Need To Be Specifically Designed To Take The Crane Loads.

ADVANTAGES OF HARSIDDHI CRAIN WALL TRAVELLING JIB CRANES WITH ZX HOISTS.

Extra Hoist Brake Safety.Additional Protection Against Overloading.

No External Hoist Gears.

Double Band Rope Guide.

Hoist Gear Inspection Facility.

Unique Fail-Safe Hoist Drum.

Variable Speed Travel And Traverse.

No External Trolley Gears.

Sturdy Trolley Side Rollers.

Trolley Reaction Roller Obviates The Need For Counter Weight.

[avonengineering]

Electric Overhead Travel (EOT) Cranes

Introducing Avon Engineering advanced Electric Overhead Travel (EOT) Cranes – a pinnacle of innovation in material handling solutions. These cranes redefine the concept of heavy-duty lifting and movement, offering a seamless blend of efficiency, customization, safety, and durability for a wide range of industrial applications.

Key Features:

Experience the power of our EOT Cranes in efficiently lifting and transporting heavy loads with ease. Moreover, these cranes are designed to handle substantial weights, optimizing your material handling operations. Additionally, tailor your crane system to match your specific requirements. Avon Engineering Electric Overhead Travel EOT Cranes come in various configurations, including single girder, double girder, and underslung designs, ensuring a perfect fit for your workspace. Furthermore, achieve precise control over load movement with our advanced control systems. Safety is paramount, and our cranes are equipped with features like limit switches, overload protection, and emergency stop mechanisms to ensure secure and controlled operations. In addition, crafted for industrial environments, our EOT Cranes feature robust construction that can withstand the rigors of heavy usage. Lastly, built with quality materials and engineering expertise, they guarantee consistent performance and reliability over time. @avonengineering

Experience Cutting-Edge Material Handling: Our EOT Cranes introduce a new dimension of efficiency in material handling. Whether for manufacturing, construction, warehouses, or other sectors, these cranes deliver reliable, customizable, and safe load lifting and movement, optimizing your processes. They integrate technology, customization, safety, and durability, offering a forward-focused solution that aligns with your material handling goals. Elevate your material handling operations and invest in a product that ensures exceptional performance. Embrace a new era of material movement with our state-of-the-art EOT Cranes.

[ganeshcrane]

Ganesh Engineering - Double Beam Crane

We are the leading supplier of Double Beam Crane for various manufacturing, warehousing, chemical, and metallurgical industries. Our double beam crane can fulfill every job requirement. We are incredibly cost-effective and cheap when it comes to dealing with double beam crane throughout India. For further information, please contact us.

[swisserinstru01]

https://www.swisserinstruments.com/crane-scale.html

Swisser Instruments introduces highly strengthened crane scales in the market at affordable prices. We are trusted crane scale manufacturers in India as we provide high quality products to our customers. Our products are crafted using key features which include a large and bright LED display, longer battery life, made up of highly strengthened alloy steel.

[aradhyapp]

What to Look For in a Power Winch Machine Manufacturer?

Whether you're in the market for a new portable power winch machine, or you're looking to upgrade to a new model, you'll want to make sure you're getting the best machine possible. This is especially true if you're going to be using it to move heavy objects around. There are plenty of models out there, and choosing the best one for your needs can be a daunting task.

Industrial Power Winch Typically, an industrial power winch machine manufacturer produces a variety of winches with various capacities. These machines are suitable for use in construction sites, electric power stations, and water supply and drainage systems. They offer safe operation and low operating cost.

There are several manufacturers of industrial power winches, and each of them has their own unique features. Some of the main features of the winches include the motor brake, and transmission brake, as well as a hand brake. The brakes are important for safety purposes, as they need to be reliable and responsive.

[drnikolatesla]

One of the Greatest Inventions of All Time

Nikola Tesla has many revolutionary inventions to his credit, but he is best known for his pioneering work in the development and promotion of alternating current (AC) electrical systems. Tesla's innovations in AC technology revolutionized the generation, transmission, and distribution of electrical power, becoming the foundation for the modern electrical power systems that we use today.

There is a common misconception made that Tesla was the first to invent, or discover, AC, but this is not true. It is well-known that Hippolyte Pixii was the first to discover AC in 1832. Pixii was an instrument maker from Paris who built an early form of an alternating current electrical generator (based on the principle of electromagnetic induction discovered by Michael Faraday), and thus started a new industry in power transmission. Tesla was not the first to discover or invent an AC motor, but he was the first to invent a practical AC induction motor with commercial value that could outperform all other motors. It must be noted that Italian inventor Galileo Ferraris also invented an induction motor similar to Tesla's, but it had no commercial value, and he even admitted himself that it was useless. Tesla's induction motor operates on the principle of electromagnetic induction, properly utilizing a rotating magnetic field that induces a current in a stationary conductor, resulting in rotational motion. The utilization of the rotating magnetic field makes the motor more simple, robust, versatile, efficient, and cost effective in that it has less moving parts reducing the likelihood of mechanical failure (as was common in other motors).

Tesla's induction motor became a fundamental component in the field of electrical engineering and is used today in various applications, being one of the most widely used devices in the world. The motors play a crucial role in transmitting electrical power to homes and businesses. They are commonly used in power generation plants to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy, which is then transmitted through the power grid for distribution to various locations. Induction motors are also widely employed in appliances and machinery within homes and businesses for various applications. These applications include conveyor systems, hoists, cranes, lifts, pumps, fans, ventilation systems, compressors, manufacturing machinery, wind turbines, washing machines, refrigerators, garbage disposals, microwaves, dishwashers, vacuums, air conditioners, robotics, electric vehicles, trains, power tools, printers, etc. Basically, anything that requires a spinning action for power.

The induction motor is widely considered one of the most important inventions in the history of electrical engineering. Its importance lies in its transformative impact on industries, its efficiency and reliability, and its role in the broader electrification of society.

[furby-junkie]

Furby plushies from The Toy Factory's website Retail price: $12.60

They do NOT sell to the general public, only other businesses.

"Toy Factory, LLC, a privately held company, designs, manufactures, markets, and distributes a variety of stuffed toy & novelty products for outdoor amusement parks and attractions, location-based indoor family entertainment centers and vending companies that operate skill crane machines."

"Toy Factory does not sell to the general public at this time, due to our license agreements we can only sell business to business in the amusement industry. We understand that we have a fan following for our quality amusement plush, currently the only way for our fans to get our plush is to win them in crane machines, carnivals, attractions, parks, & indoor amusement venues."

Source (archived)

[vampiricgf]

the workers who were killed at the impacts plastics plant in tennessee were not allowed to leave until the water was already waist high and by that point it was too late. their bosses got to leave and evacuate comfortably. people always act like im exaggerating when I say your boss would let you die for the sake of their profit line yet it's very pointedly not an exaggeration. the worker is one of the most disrespected people in america. in how many jobs is it an unspoken, unofficial requirement to silently bear abuses of all kinds from people who view you as subhuman simply because you work a service job? how often have you yourself or someone you work with cried on the clock? how often have you been expected to sacrifice your time for a job meanwhile your boss can take personal time whenever they please or push work off onto others to ensure that they get to go home on time each day? how often have you or someone you know been forced to work in unsafe conditions that your boss in all likelihood knew were unsafe?

my mother worked at an industrial plant that manufactured parts for construction equipment. her boss knew the table saw they used had a broken safety shield, he never bothered to replace it. my mom had her left index finger completely severed by that same saw, because of the broken safety shield that otherwise would have prevented her from being injured if it were working properly. they were not able to reattach her finger because they couldn't find it among all the huge piles of sawdust.

my father worked for the us army at a depot. they were instructed to dump barrels of waste in fields, not being told that waste was toxic. not being given ppe equipment for handling toxic waste materials nor were they instructed to dispose of it properly. my dads spine started disintegrating as he got older. decades later it was uncovered that the groundwater for the entire town was full of that same waste that had been leeching into it after being improperly dumped back then. the us army faced no consequences for poisoning an entire towns groundwater supply nor for the health consequences in the people they had doing the dumping.

when he worked at a manufacturing plant, the same one my mother had worked at, a man was crushed to death between two cranes because they had not been manufactured properly, one was missing breaks. somehow it became a runaway vehicle and pinned that man who slowly died over a period of an hour while they struggled to get him out from between the cranes.

your boss and the company you work for do not view you as valuable beyond your ability to make them money. when workers strike for things like better regulations, higher pay, guaranteed time off or covered sick time, it's beyond important to support them. workers are not the villains or just being greedy when they strike. every workplace regulation we have is written in blood. unions are not the enemy, unions protect us.

[wimaccrane]

2-Ton Crane Trolley: An Effortless Lifting for Small-Scale Industrial Operations

Manufacturing Process of 2-Ton Trolleys for Single Girder Overhead CranesUtilization of 2-Ton Trolleys: Enhancing Efficiency Across IndustriesHow to Determine the Price of Your Crane Trolleys ProjectWIMAC CRANE: Your Trusted Partner for Quality Crane SolutionsKeywords: When it comes to efficient and precise lifting operations in small-scale industrial settings, the 2-ton trolleys for single…

[brucewaynehater101]

You asked for more Mr. Cracker backstory, well here it is:

He and his cousin Dmitri were originally built for a store display featuring this brand new winter holiday hailing from the Emperor's homeworld, and when he gained sentience he decided to go out and search for a new job because making the same poses again and again and again in a window display is a fucking terrible job. They decided to call each other cousins because they were built by two different companies that work closely together.

Dmitri got a job working security at a shipping yard, but lost his leg when the hoist on the crane failed, dropping a shipping container onto his leg. The company that manufactured the hoist came under scrutiny by Imperial authorities, and was found to be pretty dang corrupt. The company was nationalized shortly thereafter, and thoroughly reorganized. Thankfully, single legs below the knee are a lot easier to replace than what was done to Pyotr or R3gg1e, so he's kind of got this mismatch in his industrial-looking prosthetic vs. the rest of him which looks like a tin soldier. Dmitri is a kind soul, if a little meek, and he's also a fan of classical music, but in his case it's Dmitri Shostakovich.

Thank you for going more in-depth on the characters. I am curious, since they are from Earth, whether technology-based sentient beings have legal rights on Earth, or if they had to leave first.

In order to get a job, they would need to have some form of socially recognized rights (they could be paid under the table if they are not legally recognized as beings by law). Without the law allowing them basic rights, they wouldn't be able to get bank accounts, houses, may not be able to pay for supplies (whatever they eat, replacement parts, etc.), or any legal documents.

Hmm.... that makes me curious about legal rights for non-humans in general across the DC universe. I believe some non-human entities try to disguise themselves as human in order to blend in. I wonder if there's also a legal aspect as well (especially at the beginning of the JL formation). Idk much about the world-building aspects as far as that :/

[mariacallous]

On May 14, Washington slapped new tariffs on China in what looks at first glance like the latest round of a familiar trade spat. The White House imposed duties of 25 to 50 percent on a range of industrial, medical, and clean tech goods—including semiconductors, solar cells, batteries, steel, aluminum, graphite, magnets, syringes, and ship-to-shore cranes. Strikingly, the latest measures also include a whopping 100 percent tariff on electric vehicles, effectively shutting the U.S. market to Chinese-made EVs.

Seen from Washington, these measures also look like a political move as U.S. President Joe Biden courts blue-collar voters in industrial swing states such as Michigan and Pennsylvania ahead of the November presidential election. It’s unlikely, however, that Beijing shares this benign interpretation. Seen from China, the tariffs look like a serious escalation of the U.S.-China contest and are probably raising alarm bells. Here’s why.

1. Washington is playing the long game. Stories of how China has become the world leader in EV manufacturing and is flooding the world with cheap vehicles have flourished over recent months. At the global level, there certainly is something to this analysis. Chinese exports of EVs jumped by a whopping 80 percent last year, propelling China to the top of the global ranking of car exporters. Yet this does not apply to the United States, where China supplied just 2 percent of EVs sold last year. (U.S. consumers appear to have a distinct preference for South Korean, Japanese, and European EV imports.) In other words, a 100 percent tariff on a few thousand cars will not hit Chinese firms hard.

A closer look at the list of targeted sectors suggests that batteries, not cars, will be the real pain point for China. The U.S. market is important for Chinese battery firms, which supply around 70 percent of the lithium-ion batteries used in the United States. For China’s battery sector, this means that the impact of the latest U.S. tariffs will likely be huge: The usual rule of thumb is that a 1 percentage point increase in tariffs entails a 2 percent drop in trade. With tariffs rising from 7.5 percent to 25 percent, the rule suggests that Chinese battery firms’ U.S. sales could drop by around one-third—or by $5 billion when one includes the entire battery supply chain. With Chinese battery-makers already seeing their profits plummet amid softening global demand, this is certainly bad news for Beijing.

Crucially, batteries are also an area where the U.S. government is investing huge amounts of public funds, in particular through the Inflation Reduction Act, which seeks to boost U.S. domestic production of clean tech goods. Seen in this light, the latest U.S. tariffs are preemptive measures to protect a nascent clean tech industry and make sure that there is domestic demand for future U.S. production. This suggests that the United States is playing the long game here, with little chance the tariffs will be lifted anytime soon. On the contrary—the U.S. clean tech market could well be closed to Chinese firms from here on out.

2. The White House is trying to force Europe to come on board and impose similar tariffs on China. Biden is probably seeking to score electoral brownie points with a 100 percent tariff on EVs, making former President Donald Trump’s proposal for 60 percent on U.S. imports from China look almost feeble. (Not to be outdone, Trump just announced that he would apply a 200 percent tariff on Chinese-branded cars made in Mexico.) Yet the reality is that Biden’s tariffs will not prove game-changing in the short term: Their implementation will be phased in over two years, and supply chain adjustments typically take time. In short, the measures are unlikely to fuel a U.S. industrial boom in time for the November elections.

What will happen before the election, though, is the conclusion in June or July of the European Union’s ongoing anti-subsidy investigation into China’s EV makers. Rumors abound of a possible tariff of 20 to 30 percent on Chinese EVs. Such a prospect is probably unnerving for Beijing; the EU is the biggest export market for China’s EVs, absorbing around 40 percent of Chinese shipments. The United States hopes that its 100 percent tariff on EVs will compel the EU to not only follow Washington’s example in imposing a tariff on Chinese EVs but perhaps also consider a higher one. This bold strategy could well work. Europe is unlikely to enjoy having its arm twisted by Washington, but the bloc will also worry that Chinese EV makers could double down on their push to dominate the EU market now that they have lost access to the U.S. one.

Chinese EVs look set to be a key topic when G-7 leaders meet for their annual summit in June. The United States will probably try to cajole Germany, which has long been dovish vis à vis China, into supporting sharply higher tariffs. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has pointed to the fact that European auto manufacturers “sell a great many vehicles that are produced in Europe to China”—hinting at German fears that China could retaliate against EVs and internal combustion engine cars imported from the EU.

3. The tariffs are a serious escalation from Washington’s previous de-risking strategy. In recent years, U.S. de-risking has focused on reducing the United States’ reliance on China for crucial goods and curbing Beijing’s access to dual-use technology in a bid to avoid fueling the country’s military advances. To implement this strategy, Washington has so far relied on two main tools from its economic statecraft kit: financial sanctions (for instance, on firms linked to the People’s Liberation Army) and export controls (notably on semiconductors, which are dual-use goods found in most military equipment).

Washington is slowly realizing that these two tools are imperfect. China’s massive sanctions-proofing efforts mean that sanctions do not always deal a blow to Chinese firms, which may no longer be using the U.S. dollar (China now settles around half of its cross-border trade in renminbi) or Western financial channels such as SWIFT, the global payments system. Washington also understands that export controls on clean tech would not curb China’s ambitions in the field, as Chinese firms already have all the tech they need. This leaves only one option for U.S. economic statecraft: tariffs that leverage one of the country’s greatest economic assets—access to its market.

This is why the latest U.S. tariffs are likely raising red flags in Beijing. The United States is now severing access to its market in clean tech and other areas that China sees as crucial for its plans to become the world’s future economic superpower. If the EU plays ball, this approach would expose a central flaw in Beijing’s industrial strategy: What if the world’s two biggest markets—the United States and the EU—become no-go areas for Chinese firms dependent on exporting their vast production, leaving them with piles of unused goods? Few other markets are available for Chinese clean tech exports—outside Europe, North America, and East Asia, most countries lack the infrastructure for large-scale EV adoption, for example. This prospect may well keep Beijing’s planners up at night, with no easy solution in sight.

The question now is whether and how Beijing will react. Serious retaliation is unlikely, since the United States exports far less to China than vice versa. Given its current economic woes, China also has little interest in further weakening its economy—for example, by imposing export bans on critical raw materials, rare earths, or other crucial goods for Western economies.

As the latest skirmish in the battle for economic dominance between Washington and Beijing, the new U.S. tariffs raise a number of bigger questions: Will Washington succeed in its efforts to create a domestic ecosystem for clean tech? Will the United States and Europe manage to cooperate—or go their own ways in their economic relations with China? Will the United States continue to curb Chinese access to the U.S. market for the purposes of de-risking—and if so, in which sectors? There is probably only one certainty in the U.S.-China economic war: The conflict will continue well after the November elections, whatever their outcome.

[beardedmrbean]

WASHINGTON ― President Joe Biden is hiking tariffs on electric vehicles, semiconductors and several other goods imported from China, escalating a trade war between the two world's largest economies as the U.S. accuses Chinese competitors of unfair practices in industries the U.S. is trying to grow.

The moves, which come amid rising tensions between the U.S. and China, are designed to protect American industries in clean energy that the administration has targeted with major investments to try to catch up with China.

Other goods from China slapped with higher tariffs include solar cells, batteries, battery materials, cranes used at ports, and certain medical supplies, as well as steel and aluminum imported from China.

The Biden administration has for months accused China of unfair trade practices by flooding the global markets with goods at artificially low prices, putting U.S. manufacturing of electric vehicles, microchips and other goods at a steep disadvantage.

Lael Brainard, director of the National Economic Council in the White House, said the objective of the higher tariffs is to "make sure that historic investments in jobs spurred by President Biden's actions are not undercut by a flood of unfairly underpriced exports from China."

Biden, whose administration reviewed the tariff rates over the past year, is keeping intact more than $300 billion in tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump. Biden will announce the new increases during a White House speech Tuesday.

Some of the tariff hikes include:

Electric vehicles from China: from 25% to 100% beginning this year.

Semiconductors from China: from 25% to 50% by 2025.

Lithium-ion batteries from China used in electric vehicles: from 7.5% to 25% this year.

Solar cells imported from China: from 25% to 50% this year.

Steel and aluminum products: form 0%-7.5% to 25% this year.

Ship-to-shore container cranes imported from China: from zero to 25% this year

Hospital syringes and needles made in China: from zero to 50% this year.

China pushed back strongly against the higher tariffs.

Wang Wenbin, a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, called the moves "self-defeating" and against the consensus reached last November by Biden and Chinese President Jinping Xi during a summit in San Francisco.

"More importantly, it will harm the world’s green economic transition and climate action," Wenbin said. "We urge the U.S. to stop repairing and digging up the road at the same time, so to speak, and create enabling conditions for China-U.S. climate cooperation and global green transition."

Another ministry spokesman last Friday said, "China will take all necessary measures to defend its rights and interests."

The moves come as Biden is courting the support of working-class voters in Midwest battleground states including Michigan, the center of the U.S. auto industry, for the November election.

Biden is borrowing from the trade playbook of Trump, the Republican presumptive nominee, who routinely raised tariffs on Chinese goods during his four years in office.

"Where have you been for the last three and a half years? They should have done it a long time ago," Trump said Biden's tariffs, speaking outside a New York courtroom, where is attending day 17 of his hush-money trial. "But they've also got to do it on other vehicles, and they have to do it on a lot of other products. Because China's eating our lunch right now."

Biden has sought to differentiate his tariff approach with his predecessor's plan for new tariffs. Biden last month slammed Trump's campaign proposals as "across-the-board tariffs on all imports from all countries that could badly hurt American consumers." Trump has proposed a 60% or more tariff on all Chinese imports and warned the U.S. auto industry will face a "bloodbath" if he loses his election in November.

Biden has staked his economic agenda on reigniting a U.S. manufacturing boom centered on electric vehicles and clean energy.

The Biden administration says it has helped spur more than $860 billion in private investment through legislation passed during Biden's first two years in office that incentivized the manufacturing of electric vehicles, clean-energy products, microchips and other investments.

Brainard said the tariff hikes will "ensure that American businesses and workers have the opportunity to compete on a level playing field in industries that are vital to our future such as clean energy and semiconductors."

Biden called for the tripling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from China during a campaign speech last month before the United Steelworkers union in Pittsburgh.

Each of the tariff increases reflect the recommendations of Biden's United States Trade Representative, Katherine Tai, who evaluated the rates as part of a mandatory four-year review.

[dailyanarchistposts]

Footnotes, part 3

[201] Lloyd, Henry Demarest, “Lords of Industry,” 1910, chapter 3.

[202] Lloyd, Henry Demarest, “Lords of Industry,” 1910, chapter 4.

[203] Lloyd, Henry Demarest, “Lords of Industry,” 1910, chapter 4.

[204] Giblin, L. F., “Australia, 1930,” an inaugural lecture, delivered in the Public Lecture Theatre University of Melbourne, 28th April, 1930.

[205] Lloyd, Henry Demarest, “Lords of Industry,” 1910, chapter 7.

[206] Nader, Ralph, and Gordon, Jerome, “Safety on the Job,” New Republic, Copyright 1968, Harrison-Blaine of New Jersey, Inc.. Quoted from Hot War on the Consumer, Edited by David Sanford, 1969, page 179.

[207] Malthus, Thomas, “An Essay on the Principle of Population,” 1798, chapter 5.

[208] Malthus, Thomas, “An Essay on the Principle of Population,” 1798, chapter 18.

[209] Simonde de Sismondi, J. C. L., “Political Economy,” 1815, chapter 4.

[210] Simonde de Sismondi, J. C. L., “Political Economy,” 1815, chapter 7.

[211] Owen, Robert, “A New View of Society,” 1816, essay 2.

[212] Senior, Nassau, “Three Lectures on the Rate of Wages,” 1830, lecture 1.

[213] Senior, Nassau, “Three Lectures on the Rate of Wages,” 1830, lecture 1.

[214] Senior, Nassau, “Three Lectures on the Rate of Wages,” 1830, lecture 1.

[215] Ingersoll, Robert Green, “Eight Hours Must Come,” 1877.

[216] Van Etten, Ida M., “Russian Jews as Desirable Immigrants,” 1893.

[217] Van Etten, Ida M., “Russian Jews as Desirable Immigrants,” 1893.

[218] Van Etten, Ida M., “Russian Jews as Desirable Immigrants,” 1893.

[219] Van Etten, Ida M., “Russian Jews as Desirable Immigrants,” 1893.

[220] Van Etten, Ida M., “Russian Jews as Desirable Immigrants,” 1893.

[221] Morgan, T.J., “Reports by Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[222] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[223] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[224] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[225] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[226] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[227] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[228] Morgan, T.J., “Testimony of Mrs. T. J. Morgan,” 1893.

[229] Inspection Committee on Manufactures on the Sweating System, “Report of the Committee on Manufactures on the Sweating System,” 1893.

[230] Inspection Committee on Manufactures on the Sweating System, “Report of the Committee on Manufactures on the Sweating System,” 1893.

[231] Kelley, Florence, “Florence Kelley’s Testimony on the Sweating System,” 1893.

[232] Kelley, Florence, “Florence Kelley’s Testimony on the Sweating System,” 1893.

[233] Kelley, Florence, “Florence Kelley’s Testimony on the Sweating System,” 1893.

[234] Kelley, Florence, “The Sweating System of Chicago,” 1893.

[235] Kelley, Florence, “The Sweating System of Chicago,” 1893.

[236] Kelley, Florence, “The Sweating System of Chicago,” 1893.

[237] Kelley, Florence, “The Sweating System of Chicago,” 1893.

[238] Kelley, Florence, “The Sweating System of Chicago,” 1893.

[239] Kelley, Florence, “First Annual Report of the Factory Inspectors of Illinois,” 1894.

[240] Kelley, Florence, “First Annual Report of the Factory Inspectors of Illinois,” 1894.

[241] Kelley, Florence, “First Annual Report of the Factory Inspectors of Illinois,” 1894.

[242] Kelley, Florence, “First Annual Report of the Factory Inspectors of Illinois,” 1894.

[243] Kelley, Florence, “First Annual Report of the Factory Inspectors of Illinois,” 1894.

[244] Crane, Stephen, “In the Depths of a Coal Mine,” 1894.

[245] Crane, Stephen, “In the Depths of a Coal Mine,” 1894.

[246] Crane, Stephen, “In the Depths of a Coal Mine,” 1894.

[247] Crane, Stephen, “In the Depths of a Coal Mine,” 1894.

[248] Crane, Stephen, “In the Depths of a Coal Mine,” 1894.

[249] Kelley, M.E.J., “The Union Label,” July 1897.

[250] Kelley, M.E.J., “The Union Label,” July 1897.

[251] Cahan, Abraham, “The Russian Jew in America,” 1898.

[252] Bakunin, Mikhail, “The Capitalist System,” Date Unknown.

[253] Working Women’s Society, “Report of the Tenement House Committee,” Date Unknown.

[254] McDowell, John, “The Life of a Coal Miner,” 1902.

[255] McDowell, John, “The Life of a Coal Miner,” 1902.

[256] McDowell, John, “The Life of a Coal Miner,” 1902.

[257] Robinson, Margaret Blake, “Among the Coal-Miners,” 1902.

[258] Robinson, Margaret Blake, “Among the Coal-Miners,” 1902.

[259] Boutwell, George S., “The Enslavement of American Labor,” 1902.

[260] Boutwell, George S., “The Enslavement of American Labor,” 1902.

[261] Poole, Ernest, “Newsboy Wanderers Are Tramps in the Making,” 1903.

[262] Poole, Ernest, “Newsboy Wanderers Are Tramps in the Making,” 1903.

[263] Poole, Ernest, “Newsboy Wanderers Are Tramps in the Making,” 1903.

[264] Chicago Tribune, “Childhood’s Golden Dreams,” 1903.

[265] Chicago Tribune, “Childhood’s Golden Dreams,” 1903.

[266] Hall, Fred S., “A Child Labor Commencement Day,” 1903.

[267] Hall, Fred S., “A Child Labor Commencement Day,” 1903.

[268] Charities, “Physicians Pass Resolutions on Child Labor,” Charities 11 (Aug. 22, 1903).

[269] Daniel, Annie S., “The Wreck of the Home: How Wearing Apparel is Fashioned in the Tenements,” 1905.

[270] Daniel, Annie S., “The Wreck of the Home: How Wearing Apparel is Fashioned in the Tenements,” 1905.

[271] Daniel, Annie S., “The Wreck of the Home: How Wearing Apparel is Fashioned in the Tenements,” 1905.

[272] Daniel, Annie S., “The Wreck of the Home: How Wearing Apparel is Fashioned in the Tenements,” 1905.

[273] Daniel, Annie S., “The Wreck of the Home: How Wearing Apparel is Fashioned in the Tenements,” 1905.

[274] Daniel, Annie S., “The Wreck of the Home: How Wearing Apparel is Fashioned in the Tenements,” 1905.

[275] Wright, R. R., Jr., “The Negro in Times of Industrial Unrest,” 1905.

[276] Wright, R. R., Jr., “The Negro in Times of Industrial Unrest,” 1905.

[277] Wright, R. R., Jr., “The Negro in Times of Industrial Unrest,” 1905.

[278] Wright, R. R., Jr., “The Negro in Times of Industrial Unrest,” 1905.

[279] Daniels, John, “Industrial Conditions Among Negro Men in Boston,” 1905.

[280] Hart, J.W., “The Church and Workingmen,” 1906.

[281] Sherman, Mary, “Manufacturing of Foods in the Tenements,” 1906.

[282] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[283] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[284] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[285] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[286] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[287] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[288] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[289] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[290] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[291] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[292] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[293] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[294] Alger, George W., “Some Equivocal Rights of Labor,” Atlantic Monthly, March, 1906. Quoted in: Van Kleeck, Mary, “Working Hours of Women in Factories,” 1906–1907.

[295] Palmer, Lewis E., “The Day’s Work of a ‘New Law’ Tenement Inspector,” 1906–1907.

[296] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Child Labor in New York City Tenements,” 1908.

[297] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Child Labor in New York City Tenements,” 1908.

[298] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Child Labor in New York City Tenements,” 1908.

[299] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Child Labor in New York City Tenements,” 1908.

[300] Van Kleeck, Mary, “Child Labor in New York City Tenements,” 1908.