#I don’t disagree with any of the messages but did you have to broadcast it so obviously?

[empress-of-snark]

Rewatching season two of Resident Alien because I never actually finished it and season three is coming up soon (hopefully), and… remember back in the day when kids shows had to do those awkward PSA episodes about drugs or alcohol that always felt unnatural and shoe-horned in?

That’s what the ‘Girls Night’ episode feels like. Like they were paid to do an episode about feminism and had to make the message as obvious as possible by having each female character rant about the patriarchy for the entire forty-five minute runtime. Exhausting, honestly.

[breakerwhiskey]

094 - NINETY-FOUR

Please visit breakerwhiskey.com for more information or to send a message to Whiskey's radio. Breaker Whiskey is an Atypical Artists production created by Lauren Shippen. If you'd like to support the show, please visit patreon.com/breakerwhiskey.

Transcript under the cut. For more episodes, click here.

[click, static]

Breaker breaker, this is Whiskey calling out for Birdie. You here?

[one beep]

Hell yes. How long’ve we got today?

[five beeps]

Five…five minutes? We have five minutes?

[one beep]

Okay, Jesus Christ. Well, I’ve been thinking about this, what I would ask. So let’s go, one beep for yes, two for no, three beeps when the answer is too complicated, and one dash for I don’t know. Alright?

[one beep]

Okay. Have you known who I am this whole time?

[two beeps]

No…okay, did you guess my name?

[two beeps]

Then how— Have you—have you seen me, in person somehow? Not that that would help you know my name…

[two beeps]

Did I—this is embarrassing but—have I told you my name and I just forgot?

[two beeps]

Okay, well, that’s a relief that I’m not broadcasting my name everywhere.

[two beeps]

No? I am broadcasting my name?

[two beeps]

No again—

[dash dot dash dot; dash dash dot dash]

Can you do that again?

[dash dot dash dot; dash dash dot dash]

CQ - oh, seek you. Um…there was—there was a CQ for me?

[one beep]

What—you mean, so, you did hear my name over a broadcast?

[one beep]

Holy shit…what else did they say?

[two beeps]

So you just heard my name?

[one beep]

Do you know who it was?

[two beeps]

No, why would you. I don’t even know why I’m asking really…there’s only one person it could’ve been. And considering you sent me a message of my full first name, despite it being more to tap out…well, she’s the only one who doesn’t use the shortened version. Harry, that is. She’s the only one who knows I exist other than you. Who else would it have been?

So…Harry got a radio, learned how to use it, and broadcast something to me. Looking for me.

[one beep]

Jesus, okay. How did I miss this?

[click, static]

Right, um, was it the middle of the night?

[two beeps]

Hm…oh- was it while I was camping? When I left the radio behind?

[one beep]

Shit. I wonder—god, I mean if I had been there would I have been able to…

Have you been able to get into contact with her?

[two beeps]

Have you tried?

[two beeps]

Would you try? I mean—what am I saying, I don’t know why I—

[click, static]

Do you think I should try to contact her?

[click, static]

I guess that’s not something you can really decide, huh? Do you think you have the capability to contact her? I’m not sure I do.

[one long beep]

One dash— don’t know, right?

[one beep]

Okay, so you’re not sure if you could contact her, but you did pick up her broadcast. But not on purpose?

[one beep]

Yes, it was on purpose?

[two beeps]

Wha—oh, yes as in ‘that’s right’, it wasn’t on purpose. Okay, I clearly need to be more intentional in my phrasing. Do you think you picked her up on skip?

[one beep]

Right. Okay, I…I don’t know what to do with any of this, to be honest.

[click, static]

Shit, okay, I don’t want to run out of time with you. I need to ask about the message you sent last night. You said “you’re wrong”.

[one beep]

Wrong about what? I mean—was it something I said yesterday that I was wrong about?

[one beep]

Okay, I was talking about the meteor crater, right? So…I mean, I’m assuming it wasn’t about the crater itself. What else was I talking about…

The fact that we have no control over the impact that we make? You disagree?

[two beeps]

No, that’s not it.

[dot dash, dash dot dot dot, dot dot]

I recognize that—my name, right? Well, the shortened version.

[one beep]

So it was something about me that I said?

[one beep]

What, that the choices I’ve made didn’t change the world?

[one beep]

What? That’s what you think I’m wrong about?

[one beep]

Birdie, what does that mean?

[two long beeps]

What? Oh that’s—that’s goodbye isn’t it.

[one beep]

Wait, you can’t leave yet, what do you mean?

[two long beeps]

Ugh, fine. But you’ll be here next Thursday? Same time?

[one beep]

Alright, I guess I’ll have to just live with that—but explain in your next transmission please.

[two long beeps]

Whiskey out.

[click, static]

[yyunari]

u+me=love . 08

╰ emotional support sunghoon ♡

─────────────────────

─────────────────────

she just didn’t understand. after so long, what reason did he have for trying to get back at her once more?

she just didn’t understand. after so long, what reason did he have for trying to get back at her once more?

she just didn’t understand. after so long, what reason did he have for trying to get back at her once more?

she just didn’t understand. after so long, what reason did he have for trying to get back at her once more?

she just didn’t understand. after so long, what reason did he have for trying to get back at her once more?

before y/n could ponder on this any further, the door to the student council room slammed open to reveal sunghoon.

“sunghoon? what are you doing here?” y/n asked, not taking her eyes off of her paperwork. she worried that if she did it would diminish her focus. “it’s way too early, you should go get something to eat.”

“shouldn’t i be saying that to you? this isn’t a healthy way to cope, you know that don’t you?” sunghoon stated as he took a seat directly in front of his anxious best friend.

sunghoon could see the dark eyebags that indicated she got no more than 3 hours of sleep the night before. and the usual bright smile that adorned her features was replaced with a straight line that only seemed to deepen as time went by.

he felt angry— angry to the people who thought it was a good idea to mess with her again. angry to the people who gave her problems. angry to the guy who sent out those tweets and messages.

but most of all, sunghoon was angry at himself for not taking better care of y/n.

perhaps if he did, she wouldn’t be so worrisome when her past came to bite her in the back.

“did you hear what i said?”

sunghoon looked up and y/n, and noticed how she held out money to him. previously out of thought, he wasn’t sure what she was doing.

“not you spacing out. anyways, here’s some money. go buy yourself some food in the shop since you’re here early anyways.”

“what about you? there’s no way you’re not hungry.”

y/n rolled her eyes in annoyance. why couldn’t sunghoon just take the money? she loved him but sometimes he was too much. “fine, get me strawberry milk. i already ate at home.”

the boy sighed but took the money nonetheless. there was no use in arguing with y/n— not that he wanted to anyways. but he knew she needed more than just some milk so he opted to buying her some cheese bread, which he knew was her favorite.

sunghoon left the student council room in a hurry as he wanted to get the bread while it was still warm. he knew that the shop opened at 7:10, so he had about a minute to get downstairs.

but because he wasn’t paying attention to where he was going, sunghoon felt himself bump into another person.

who else could possibly be here this early?

“oh, sorry about that.” sunghoon saw a hand being offered to him. as he looked up, he saw a rather familiar face.

he grabbed his hand and stood up. “jungwon? what are you doing here?”

jungwon gave him a tight smile. “i have to be in the broadcasting room in about…” he checked his watch. “5 1/2 minutes.”

“5 1/2? says who?”

“says me.”

sunghoon playfully rolled his eyes. “good for you. oh but since you’re going in that direction, can you stop by the student council office and check up on y/n? thanks!” before jungwon could disagree, sunghoon ran off to do whatever he was about to do before.

jungwon tilted his head in confusion. check up on y/n? but he didn’t want to dwell on it too much because he had a schedule to stick to and he had 5 more minutes until he had to be in the broadcasting room. if he didn’t get there on time, then his whole schedule would be thrown off.

i’ll check how y/n’s doing real quick and get back to my schedule, jungwon thought.

─────────────────────

prev ‹ masterlist ‹ next

a/n : ALMOSR JUNGWON AND Y/N INTERACTION😏😏😏 also just a hint for what happened in y/n’s past— if you’ve seen ‘live on’ its similar to that but not exactly that😁

taglist : @muhwaa @hoori @hukori @ja4hyvn @yenart @yvesismywife @sunysunoo @maiwon @diestheticu @hiqhkey @lala-loopsydoll @acciomylove @beibybtch @naxoxomi

[pla-teau]

WHATTHEFUCK WANDAVISION EPISODE 5

SPOILERS AHEAD, YOU’VE BEEN WARNED

GIFS AREN’T MINE

EPISODE 4 THOUGHTS

opening title | right off the bat, the paintbrush is surrounded by wanda’s powers. this adds to the assumption that wanda is the mastermind behind all that is happening with westview. could mean nothing but i just find that little detail interesting. also, in the recap, in the quick moment in episode 3, we see another variation of the scene when vision asks wanda where geraldine went. she says “she’s gone. she didn’t belong here.” i feel like in recaps to come, we’ll see slight variations of past scenes to indicate that the reality in westview is breaking or just to show the actual words exchanged during the altered scene. wanda is the one broadcasting and chooses what audiences can and cannot see so maybe this is the original cut of the scene that we nor SWORD saw in the broadcast.

agnes | first off, agnes breaks character for a second like an actress who screws up and so everyone has to do a retake. when she says to wanda that she wants her to hold the kids, wanda is even confused for a second. she looks to her like she’s the one in charge. i think she did this on purpose since vision went off script as well in not letting agnes hold the boys. even though there’s footage in the 90s episode that she’s also being controlled by wanda when vision pulls her out of the trance, i still think she’s working with the main bad guy to hurt wanda. she doesn’t seem to react when the boys age up twice in front of her, always making a witty and funny comment.

wanda’s a terrorist | the way hayward quickly labeled wanda as a terrorist makes me think that there’s ulterior motives with this dude. didn’t want to believe it but marvel has put me in a habit of assuming guys in suits have sinister agendas. while jimmy woo gives a brief rundown of wanda’s life, hayward is quick to focus on the negative aspect because she’s a criminal with the sokovia accords still in place. he seems to be the only one driving this idea forward just because he’s the acting director of SWORD. he even put a damn missile on the retro drone monica controlled to get inside the anomaly. as acting director, he would know that a missile is useless against an avenger with wanda’s powers. i believe that he knew that missile wouldn’t do anything to wanda and the sole purpose was to antagonize her to continue painting her as the sole mastermind behind westview. i think he’s just trying to shift the blame from SWORD to wanda now that she possesses the body that can be used to create more weapons etc. etc.

vision’s body | so that scene we saw in the sneak peek was indeed footage of wanda stealing vision’s body and that SWORD was in possession of it. with monica saying in the previous episode that SWORD doesn’t do creation and hayward saying they’re focusing on robotics etc., it makes SWORD also v hypocritical because the brief footage we see of him - he’s dismembered. it doesn’t take much to assume that SWORD was most likely using vision’s body towards their robotics, nanotech and AI projects.

lagos commercial | clearly this is in reference to wanda’s accidental killing of innocent lives after trying to protect steve from crossbones in civil war. the saying “for when you make a mess you didn’t mean to” at the end makes me disagree more on haydick hayward’s assumption that she’s a terrorist. i like how they used this as a paper towel commercial as after lagos, the sokovia accords were written. for me, the paper towel represents the actual accords since they’re drafted on paper, right? how do we clean up any mess in the real world? with laws and regulations being written and enforced aka a piece of paper.

norm’s moment of consciousness | norm is granted a moment of consciousness by vision and is quickly hysterical. his statements about how vision has to stop and get her out of his head has me split. on one hand, he could be talking about wanda since monica said the same thing in her recounting of the events in the anomaly. but i also think it’s agnes or someone else who’s just disguising themselves as wanda (her emotions, grief, etc) to get everyone to see wanda as the bad guy (again).

SWORD computer message | how was the westview reality able to see this message by SWORD? it didn’t have much detail and only the basic rundown of what was going on but it’s interesting to see that message be ‘intercepted’ by the hex. we didn’t see from the outside that they were trying to communicate with wanda or someone within the town. it was also weird how the whole staff read it together at once - very creepy and raises more questions than answers.

“you can fix the dead” | tommy’s comment to wanda when sparky passes away. clearly the only dead one is vision in wanda’s world even though he appears very much alive in westview. i don’t think even wanda knows the true extent of her powers if she is the main perpetrator in all of this. i’ve also seen people mention that maybe the death of sparky is meant to push wanda to unlock that power if she has the ability to bring back the dead.

wanda and vision arguing | from the get go, we’re seeing vision going off script because he’s piecing things together. he notices how agnes always comes in to save the day or with something the couple needs. i like that we’re seeing the pair fight because they haven’t been on the same page arguably since episode 3 which was the last time we saw wanda edit an episode.

“you’ve never talked to me like this before” | wanda to vision. as i’ve said before, the show is really making vision seem more of the human one of the couple even being supposedly dead. what wanda says is true, we’ve never seen vision so much as raise his voice at wanda. in the past, before westview, vision always tread lightly around wanda and thought about how to word news of something she may not react well to. he’s always been calculating and thoughtful in his approach to wanda. even when she shoved him down however deep into the ground to leave the avengers facility in civil war, vision didn’t yell at her when they fought. it’s been nothing but love that vision has communicated to wanda. now with his clear frustration of the situation and evidence, it’s understandable that he’s yelling at her. it’s human to assume and jump to the worst conclusion about someone. he’s becoming more human in being upset and frustrated with someone he cares for that looks like the bad guy and victimizer of a whole town and seemingly controlling him and making decisions for him. i really hope he doesn’t get killed off at the end because i’m truly loving vision’s growth and range throughout the series.

“i can’t remember my life before westview” | this speaks to vision’s physical state. i think he’s not fully dead but because he doesn’t have the mind stone. every iteration we’ve seen of vision in the mcu has been with the stone since 2015. he doesn’t remember his creation or his death in 2018. the last 8 years are a blank for vision and understandably so, he’s upset and frustrated at the situation and at wanda. maybe it’s because he’s in the hex and maybe once outside, he’ll remember or somehow recount what’s happened? again, i hope he doesn’t just die once he gets out of the hex.

pietro’s ‘recast’ | the most shocking part of this episode that made me choke on my water and feel 50 different emotions in a matter of seconds. anyways, i think wanda damn well knows that it isn’t the brother she lost. i think she pieces it together that he is pietro but just not her world’s pietro like she feels some sort of connection to this pietro (if that makes any sense)? love that this brings in the multiverse into the mcu. i am still was holding my breath for aaron taylor-johnson but seeing evan peters’ peter was a fun surprise. in rewatching, the episode sets this surprise cameo up with billy and tommy asking her about pietro and this reoccurring theme that ‘family is forever’. i think that either wanda doesn’t realize her powers and her life in westview is bringing in people from other universes or that whoever is behind all of this is giving wanda one more reason to stay in westview since vision is starting to go off script and can’t be controlled by wanda anymore.

long lost bro | the fact he says this makes me curious as to whether this truly is peter from the x-men universe or if whoever is orchestrating this is just using peter’s body to manipulate wanda and play along in her ‘show’. if it’s truly peter that’s been plucked from the x-men universe, maybe he’s given this knowledge or whoever is controlling him is planting that information in his brain so he can say that he’s wanda’s long lost brother which he technically is. there’s also been people pointing out that in the mirror behind wanda looks distorted when you look, you would be able to see peter and wanda’s in the reflection. it looks unreal and this could be a key to seeing the reality of what’s happening in westview, maybe hopefully this’ll be a key to opening wanda’s eyes that something clearly isn’t right.

[kitkatopinions]

The only way I can see RWBY recovering in quality is if the island arc in volume 9 ends with seemingly days passing in the island world and a time skip in Remnant. The world of Remnant and their friends have moved on from the loss of RWBYJ in Atlas and have been dealing with Salem for 3 years or so. Gives the world time to heal from the damage RWBY+ caused in Atlas and with the broadcast and realize how much they fucked up following Ruby Rose blindly. Solves the age gap debates of Rosegarden if that's the ship they want to go with for Ruby and Oscar. Let's Sun move on from Blake organically and allows Blake to come to terms with any romantic feelings she had for him and how that chance is long gone. An opportunity for Salem to take control in a way that might not have been possible were it not for RWBY+'s actions in Atlas. Shows that the protagonists can fuck up and suffer consequences.

Ahhh, see, I specifically don't want a time skip because I think it likely will be a way to remove the affects of a bunch of the stuff that I want pay off for. You say that having the world have time to heal from RWBY + actions would be a good way to show the consequences, but I disagree with that. I think that'd actually be the quickest way to make Ruby's actions not matter and not seem important. Having her forced to see the full effects of her actions as the suffering is unfolding in front of her would be a way to get her to actually see for herself that maybe she's made some massive mistakes.

Can I paint a picture for you?

Ruby, Yang, Blake, Weiss, and Jaune get back from the island quickly, only a day having gone by for the people in Remnant. The refugees have just arrived in Vacuo, they lost tons of people trying to get through the desert, everyone is staggering with exhaustion as they move through the Vacuo streets, parents carrying their sobbing children, there are people throwing rocks at Winter and people trying to beg her to save them because they saw her fly through the gates and guessed that she was magic, there's sirens over a comm system in the city, trying to alert everyone to remain calm that's been going on for the hours it's taken to try and get everyone in and calm-ish in the first place. On top of that, the gates are flooded with guards working around the clock to keep Grimm out of the city, some of the exhausted Atlas hunters have gone there as well, Ren and Fiona and Team SSSN are desperately defending the last few hundred stragglers as they arrive. Ruby, Yang, Weiss, Blake, and Jaune are shocked, dismayed, they manage to get to the Academy where Nora is there with Oscar and Theodore, Theodore trying to get in contact with the Vacuo council in clear distress. Oscar tells them that everything has gone wrong, that everyone is panicking, that Vacuo was already struggling with keeping the Grimm away from the city when Ruby's message came, and with the addition of the refugees, the Grimm are coming in by the hundreds - by the thousands - almost more than the Vacuo authorities can fight back. Ruby is so confused, she'd been trying to reunite the world! But she just brought panic instead, and she now has to contend with that while seeing the immediate aftermath. She knows Qrow is missing, she tries calling him on her scroll, hoping she just missed him among the refugees. She and Yang are going crazy with worry, they think he might've been stuck in Atlas, he might be hurt, he might be dead, he might get captured by Salem, and they both have to face that. Being assigned by Theodore to help get refugees to the homes they've been temporarily assigned to squeeze into, Ruby is confronted by grieving families who lost everything, parents who tell her their daughter was one of the Atlas soldiers who died fighting on the front lines at Atlas, a couple with four kids spit at her and refuse her help because to them, her broadcast felt like a death sentence for Atlas while she called for hope for the rest of the world like they didn't matter. As she's traveling, Ruby runs into Neon and Flynt. They're angry and bitter too, coldly telling her that Ivori and Kobalt died in the fight against Salem. Ruby leaves that encounter wiping away tears. She wants to break down, but then gets assigned her next family to move and has to push it down and get back to work trying to do her job. Meanwhile Weiss has to deal with a brother who still clearly needs someone to help and take care of him when their relationship is somewhat rocky. Nora and Ren have to have distance and sort through what they want in their relationship and we see that and the immediate affects of their breakup. Salem has two Relics and Ruby has to explain that to Ozpin and maybe admit some mistakes and apologize while it's still relevant enough to matter to him. Emerald sees the affects of a lot of what she's done and has to contend with the fact that Mercury will be in Vacuo and she has to choose whether to try and help him or fight him instead. Mercury and Tyrian have to react in real time to the fact that the Atlas plans went completely sideways and now there's tons of people from Atlas here ruining whatever plans they have for Vacuo. Team RWBY work with Team SSSN while his and Blake's relationship is still clearly going to matter to him and he wants to continue where they left things and she has to explain her shift in feelings. Oscar is still contending with the fact that he and Oz are going to merge someday, asking questions about that. Salem must regroup now with so few people, and Cinder is going to have to try and keep up her lies in real time. Neo (if she survived the

island) is going to actually have to either get scrapped as a character or grow beyond her motivation of just wanting revenge. Winter is dealing with powers that are still new (remember, Maidens being 'new' is supposed to mean something) and having her whole world crash around her, while also maybe finally interacting with the family members outside of Weiss who have just had their entire way of life gone and now must adjust to sudden poverty. Qrow, Robyn, and the Ace Ops might have a storyline where they deal with what just happened themselves, maybe launching rescue for some of the people who didn't make it through the portals (like Pietro and Maria.)

These are all really important things that we should be expecting pay off for that should get focus and development. Ren and Nora's relationship problems, Oscar dealing with merging with Oz, how Cinder is going to regroup now, what will happen with Mercury, what the Schnees will do now they've suddenly lost everything, how Emerald is going to go on from her 'side switching,' how Qrow and Robyn reacted and where they'll go from here, whether or not Vacuo can even take in refugees, what the people think of RWBY and what consequences they've had to go through, and especially RWBY seeing the aftermath of the things instead of being allowed to just move on to the next thing and write it off as a victory like they did with Haven... All of that is something that we're likely to miss if we have a big time skip.

What I really don't want is for everyone to get back to the world after three to five years have passed only to see that it's doing pretty okay right now. Vacuo thriving with the Grimm population under control, and everything a little crowded, but most of the Atlas population settled in their new homes at this point, many of the important relationships of the side cast have been solved off screen and Maria, Pietro, and Qrow are already in Vacuo and have already adjusted to their various losses (both real for Pietro and believed for Qrow,) while (like you suggested,) Sun has just moved on from his dead former love interest he never got closure with that he promised to see again, because it has been years, and BlackSun fans like me see him in some relationship with someone he's never had any growth at all with (or maybe Neptune, which is... the preferable option over someone Sun's never actually talked to before.) Now Ruby doesn't see that her choices have caused major problems, instead she sees a city doing fine and if anyone is angry at her for causing them problems three to five years ago, they're mean. She's been supposedly dead for years and that person is just fine now! How can they yell at her? Now she doesn't see people suffering and Grimm flooding, she sees that her plan worked out in the long run, everyone just needed to hold on and have faith. She doesn't see a giant economic crash and families uprooted and soldiers dead and Pietro's reaction to the death of his daughter and people panicking over Salem... Ruby sees people talking about Salem as common knowledge, amassing troops to go after her now that the 'hard times' have started to pass, and she's validated. She knew it would turn out, she knew if she just believed, things would start working out!

I don't think the writers could save this show with a time skip, I think they'd just use it as a way to jump past the immediate affects of Ruby and her group's actions and avoid organic growth and problem solving while 'not being unrealistic' about it. If they brought RWBYJ back to Remnant within days, weeks, or even months, people expect real repercussions for the things that happened in the previous couple of seasons. They won't be able to just pretend none of it happened - or they might, but then most people will (hopefully) realize that's stupid.

So their choices are 1. just waving everything away and pretending there aren't any consequences to actions, 2. bring RWBYJ back in days, weeks, or months and address and deal with problems in a way that feels natural, 3. have a time skip so they can bypass the affects and consequences and avoid giving pay off for much of the things that fans have been expecting and waiting around for.

[gstqaobc]

'I still don't believe Meghan': Piers Morgan tweets defiant Churchill message and says he stands by view that saw him quit GMB - as Susanna Reid tells morning viewers 'it's going to be very different' without him

Ranvir Singh will host Good Morning Britain with Susanna Reid today - the day after Piers Morgan stormed off

Mr Morgan faced a social media campaign over comments he made about Harry and Meghan's interview

He faced a huge online backlash after he said he 'didn't believe a word' of the Duke and Duchess' Oprah talk

Twitter users responded by sharing links to Ofcom and gave instructions on how to complain to TV regulator

Ofcom today announced it was launching an investigation following the raft of complaints from Twitter users

MailOnline editor at large, who has helped show to record ratings, had blazing row with Alex Beresford

They were discussing the Sussexes' interview with Oprah, where the couple accused Royal Family of racism

Piers Morgan today doubled down after quitting Good Morning Britain by tweeting that he still doesn't believe any of Meghan's incendiary claims to Oprah in a defiant message sent as the show began without him with Strictly star Ranvir Singh in his chair.Susanna Reid admitted it will be a 'very different' programme without her co-star of five years and told viewers this morning that he had been a 'voice for many of you' through Brexit and the coronavirus pandemic.Mr Morgan sensationally quit the show on the day it scored record ratings after he told viewers he 'didn't believe a word she [Meghan] said' to Oprah and branded her 'Princess Pinocchio' after an interview where the Duchess said she was suicidal while five months pregnant and accused the Royal Family of racism. His views sparked more than 41,000 complaints made to Ofcom.

Just after the show began at 6am this morning he tweeted to his 7.8million followers: 'On Monday, I said I didn’t believe Meghan Markle in her Oprah interview. I’ve had time to reflect on this opinion, and I still don’t. If you did, OK. Freedom of speech is a hill I’m happy to die on. Thanks for all the love, and hate. I’m off to spend more time with my opinions'.

He also shared a quote by Britain's greatest prime minister Winston Churchill, which said:  'Some people's idea of free speech is that they are free to say what they like but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage'.

On an extraordinary day for the show he also walked off set live on air after the show's weatherman Alex Beresford accused him of unfairly 'trashing' Meghan, branding him 'diabolical' and saying: 'I'm sorry but Piers just spouts off on a regular basis and we have to sit there and listen'. Mr Beresford was not on screen today, with Laura Tobin presenting the GMB weather this morning.

Hours later Mr Morgan quit, with his supporters defending his views and claiming his exit is more bad news for free speech and a sad indictment of cancel culture in Britain after critics including Labour MP Dawn Butler encouraged people to complain to ITV and Ofcom. Others have questioned whether GMB's viewing figures will hold-up without its star, who helped add a million new viewers in his time on the show.

After Ranvir Singh, a GMB reporter and star of Strictly last year, stepped in for Piers today, Susanna then gave a short speech on the tumultuous events of the past 24 hours.

Ms Reid said: 'A number of people will know the news and many of you will not and will be surprised that Piers Morgan is not here this morning. Now, Piers and I have disagreed on many things and that dynamic was one of the things viewers loved about the programme.

'He is without doubt an outspoken, challenging, opinionated, disruptive broadcaster. He has many critics and he has many fans. You will know that I disagreed with him about Meghan's interview. He himself clarified his comments about her mental health on the show yesterday.'

Reid said there are 'many voices' on Good Morning Britain and 'everyone has their say'. She added: 'But now Piers has decided to leave the programme. Some of you may cheer and others may boo.

'He has been my presenting partner, Monday to Wednesday, for more than five years and during Brexit and the pandemic and other issues, he has been a voice for many of you and a voice that many of you have railed against.

'It is certainly going to be very different but shows go on and so on we go.'

Ranvir Singh, Reid's co-presenter for the morning, replied: 'Well said.' She described Morgan as a 'big character' and said 'many viewers will be absolutely gutted'. Singh called Morgan 'Marmite' and acknowledged his role in Good Morning Britain's success. Ms Singh is amongst the favourites to take the job, but said: 'I was here anyway, don't read anything into this, I was here anyway. I've shifted seats on this brand new desk'.

It came after 55-year-old Mr Morgan shocked viewers by walking off camera during a heated on-air row with weatherman Alex Beresford, saying 'I'm done with this' after being challenged on his position of the Duke and Duchess by his co-star. Afterwards ITV CEO Carolyn McCall - who formerly worked for the left-wing Guardian newspaper - said that the broadcaster's media and entertainment MD Kevin Lygo was speaking to Mr Morgan.And last night it was announced that Mr Morgan had quit the hugely popular ITV show - which he co-hosted with Susanna Reid.An ITV spokesman told MailOnline: 'Following discussions with ITV, Piers Morgan has decided now is the time to leave Good Morning Britain. ITV has accepted this decision and has nothing further to add.'It is understood Mr Morgan had been asked to apologise for his remarks which had been criticised by mental health campaigners but had declined.It brings to an end his six-year long association with the breakfast show, which he originally joined as a guest host in 2015, during which time he has made it must-see TV with a strong of exclusives and his strident opinions.Ironically it came the day after GMB recorded its highest ever viewing figures in the wake of Megan Markle's blockbuster Oprah Winfrey interview.It also came on the day that he had followed up with an agenda-setting interview with her father Thomas in which Mr Markle had taken aim at 'snotty' Harry, defended the British people and Royals against her claims of racism and revealed that he felt she had betrayed him, not the other way around.Earlier Morgan, who this evening Tweeted a picture of himself with former manager David Ferriter and the message 'trust your gut', also addressed his previous comments regarding the Duchess's mental health.Yesterday, he was criticised by the charity, Mind, after saying he 'didn't believe a word she said'. I wouldn't believe it if she read me a weather report,' he added.Today he addressed these remarks and said: 'When we talked about this yesterday I said as an all-encompassing thing I don't believe what Meghan Markle is saying generally in this interview and I still have serious concerns about the veracity of a lot of what she said.'But let me just state for the record on my position on mental illness and on suicide.'On mental illness and suicide these are clearly extremely serious things and should be taken extremely seriously and if someone is feeling that way they should get the treatment and the help they need every time. Every time.'And if they belong to an institution like the Royal family and they go and seek that help they should absolutely be given it.'It's not for me to question if she felt suicidal, I am not in her mind and that is for her to say.'My real concern was a disbelief frankly and I'm prepared to be proven wrong on this and if I'm wrong it is a scandal, that she went to a senior member of the Royal household and told them she was suicidal and was told she could not have any help because it would be a bad look for the family.'If that is true a) that person should be fired and b) The Royal family have serious questions that need to be answered.'But it was not enough to stop a wildfire social media campaign against him that resulted in 41,000 complaints to TV watchdog Ofcom by last night who announced they had launched a probe under their 'harms' code. The campaign featured an avalanche of tweets which criticised the host and supporting Meghan - some sharing direct links to the Ofcom complaints page. Among those launching criticism at Morgan were Labour MP Dawn Butler, who copied in the Twitter page of ITV to her Tweet.

In her social media post, which shared a comment from Mind criticising Morgan's remarks, she asked: '@ITV what have you decided to do?'Another Twitter user said: 'It took me about seven minutes to complain to fill in the Ofcom online form to complain about Piers Morgan's disgusting behaviour on mental health and race issues. It's not much, but if enough people complain they have to do something!' One Twitter user - who said: 'I am determined to get Piers off GMB Lolz. Which petitions do I need to sign?' - received a response with a link to the Ofcom complaints page.Their decision to act was in stark contrast to what happened with 24,500 people complained about dance troop Diversity's BLM-inspired routine on Britain's Got Talent last year when the watchdog refused a probe and said: 'We carefully considered a large number of complaints about this artistic routine, an area where freedom of expression is particularly important.'Diversity's performance referred to challenging and potentially controversial subjects, and in our view, its central message was a call for social cohesion and unity.'Any depictions of violence by the performers were highly stylised and symbolic of recent global events, and there was no explicit reference to any particular political organisation - but rather a message that the lives of black people matter.'Mr Morgan is also Editor at large for MailOnline and writes a twice weekly column for the website. A spokesman for MailOnline said: 'This is a very sad day for British free speech and one ITV will come to regret very quickly. We stand by Piers 120%.'  LOADS MORE ON THE DM

WELL HE HAS CERTAIN MADE HIS OPINION CLEAR AND MANY AGREE, MYSELF INCLUDED! EVEN GIVEN PAST ERRORS HE IS TO BE COMMENDED FOR TAKING SUCH A PUBLIC STANCE!

GSTQAOBC 🇨🇦🇬🇧🇦🇺🇳���

[starkassembled]

We have to agree to disagree, what Kurtzman said was diminutive, ignorant. Visual appeal was there definitely since Hannibal is an aesthete, but the goal was to tell the motives of the characters involved. The murders meant something for Will/ Hannibal or other characters, they enhanced the story of the main characters and defined key transformations (becoming) of the characters. Your attempt to dilute it feels insulting but maybe it's not your intention. I shouldn't linger here, it's your blog.

"Clarice emphasizes the victims of the cases over the killers. That’s a fact. Hannibal did not. " This is not what Kurtzman meant, he said the show will illuminate inner struggle of characters, not victims as such. Hannibal was bringing out inner struggle of the characters. "Hannibal’s emphasis was on the killers shocking acts of gore and hunting them down." Incorrect, it was about transformation, love, understanding and internal conflicts, hunt is totally secondary. //end of messages from anon/  - - - I think we’ll agree to disagree on lots of things, anon. I read the interview before the show aired and re-read it after I watched the pilot and I don’t see how Kurtzman was in any way being “diminutive, ignorant, insulting, or shallow” in his statement. It’s pretty obvious to anyone who watched both shows that they hold entirely different approaches to investigation. Hannibal’s investigations focused on the gory murder tableaus and the killer’s, getting into the minds of the twisted serial killers. Vice versa, Clarice’s approach to investigations is solely honed in on the victims, how did they get here, how did these victims correlate to one another, what ties them together? It’s a fairly canonical interpretation, given that Clarice’s own big breaks in The Silence of the Lambs were in investigating the past victims and figuring out those commonalities. Of course there was more to Hannibal than just the murders of the week. You can’t make a show about just snuff. Just like there’s a lot more to Clarice than just the crimes she investigates, a large part of the plot is also in Clarice navigating her career in a male dominated field whilst living with the PTSD stemming from the Buffalo Bill investigation, as well as Catherine Martin’s own severe PTSD. Kurtzman, in that quote, is specifically speaking about the way cases will be presented. The question Kurtzman was asked that lead to this answer was specifically about the cases. “As for just how intense the cases that Agent Starling and the VICAP investigate will get on the broadcast network, Kurtzman says it depends on what the case needs to say about our characters and their world.“

Idk why you think my interpretation comes off as “insulting” to you, I’m not trying to be. I’m just reading the interview.

[ask-whitepearl-and-steven]

Hey Chekhov, I'm gonna say in advance that if this ask is too invasive and/or personal, please ignore it. I recently came out to my best friend(and myself) that I am nonbinary, and the thing that made me realize was that I had experienced pretty bad gender dysphoria when I was younger(w/o having a term to describe it). I am curious in your own experiences with dysphoria, whether you had any, how it was for you, etc.

Aight, I’m gonna put this under a cut because I’m sure no one else need to be reading through my life story (which is painfully boring):

Basically to get a few things out of the way immediately because I know there will be some people reading this looking to poke fun at me for it, so this first part is for you - to give you something to do with your time because I pity you: 

I identify as agender, I consider myself to fall under the umbrella term ‘nonbinary’, and I have felt this way throughout basically... my whole life. (Granted, I also did not have words for this until I was in my late teens.) 

I’ve used the word agender for myselg for about 10 years now, my views regarding my gender have not shifted - and I hate the presumption that there are ‘trans-trenders’ out there. I don’t personally believe that is a thing. I think exploring your gender feelings and your gender presentation and etc is super cool and an interesting thing to do.

I believe negotiating yourself socially with regards to your gender is actually quite healthy, so if you think it’s “just a call for attention” then we already disagree. 

People want to be perceived in specific ways. That’s not a novel concept. Most people have an image of themselves they like to broadcast to the world. (Strong, smart, witty, friendly, a salesman, an artist, a feminine icon, etc.) This has been true for CENTURIES. It just so happens that now we can finally be more flexible in how we perceive gender without life threatening repercussions, so many more people are open to the idea of doing it. 

I do not believe that one must have dysphoria to be trans/non-binary, although obviously many transgender people do. I believe the defining experience of identifying as trans is a GOAL of how you want to be perceived or how you want yourself to be defined in society, because - again - I believe gender is socially and culturally negotiated. 

If you disagree with any of this - cool. You can send a message to my main tumblr @thechekhov and yell at me about it if that’s how you enjoy spending your time, but I cannot promise I’ll answer you because frankly I have hobbies and shit I enjoy doing, so I’ll probably be doing that instead.

And as an off-topic mention: I don’t personally identify as ‘trans’ (although many nonbinary people obviously do, and have every right to) and there’s a lot that goes into that but the bottom line is that I just don’t want to take up space in that community because I personally don’t want to ‘transition’ and that’s not a part of my identity in that big of a way.

But regardless of that:

To get to the meat of it (and get ready to be thoroughly disappointed if you’re carnivorous because I am the worst person to ask about this.)

I drew the lucky lottery ticket of genetics and scored well in two fields:

1) I’m white (bears mentioning, because people of color honestly get so much more shit for being nonbinary)

2) I’m naturally relatively slim and puberty kinda grazed me instead of hitting me head on. I never developed overt (publically visible) secondary sexual characteristics for my ‘assigned’ gender.

So by and by, I’m actually already WAY not the person to talk to about this because I got off easy and I’ve never actually had any big amounts of dysphoria. Other people had dysphoria FOR me (my grandmother lamented my androgyny on my behalf) - but I was always quite comfortable with my body. 

It also has to be mentioned that I never actually actively cared about my body. I was briefly invested in fashion in high school, and through college experimented with fashion and various haircuts, but three out of the five days a week I literally do not look in the mirror before I go to work. And this has nothing to do with hating how I look - I just forget to. So... I suppose that says something about me. Not sure what. (My coworkers have never complained terribly about what I wear, so presumably I do a swell enough job of passing as a human being with functioning eyes). 

That being said - when I dress to my assigned gender, I often get comments that kind of skim the borderline of “oh, finally, you’re normal for a change”. They’re always well-meant, but quite surprised, because I feel like people have come to expect me to dress a little weirdly. 

And that isn’t to say I haven’t experienced disgruntlement with how I’m perceived. People often purposefully gender me at work - and that’s not a totally bad thing, and I don’t blame them for it. The country I live in has close to ZERO knowledge of non-binary identities, even WITHIN the local LGBTQA+ community, so I can’t expect others to know anything more. But I think my ability to not care about this spills over from my ability to not care about my appearance. It’s just a handy little personality trait - I am blissfully indifferent to what others think of me 90% of the time (as for the other 10%... well... we all have bad days. I’m not totally emotionless.) 

Perhaps this will get me into hot water but - I’ve never once corrected a person about my own gender. I’ve been fully comfortable in it, and I am aware of it in my own head but as someone who has been in the closet about my bisexuality for over 10 years, I am not invested in risking social retaliation for the sake of something I know 90% of the people around me will not understand - or perhaps purposefully misunderstand. 

If asked about it I’m rather forthright, and I make jokes about it with friends, but other than that I just kind of.... live my life. Whether or not I’m ‘clearly nonbinary’ to my peers is up for debate - I like to think I am, but like the metaphorical mirror that I avoid looking into, I never actually questioned any of my irl friends about how well I ‘pass’ or... don’t, I guess? But it’s not actually that important to me. I dress how I enjoy dressing, which is, I think, the most important thing (and it confuses the students a bit, they can’t gender me as successfully as adults can).

And that’s all I need, really. 

Cheers. 

[samueldays]

What are your thoughts on the Jan 6 "Insurrection"?

I had a very long draft about that lying around for a while, so you're getting a long answer as I copy-paste and trim it into something publishable.

The Mandate of Heaven belongs to the winners.

The MAGA rioters of Jan 6th lost. They neither had nor seized the Mandate of Heaven; therefore, they are scum who deserved to lose. Boo them! Boo those monsters, those retards, those traitors! They have contravened the will of Heaven!

Does that sound exaggeratedly harsh? Do you prefer some other grounds for condemnation than mere defeat? Then let me add this charge against them: they had neither will nor plans to win. Also, they were stupid and wasteful.

It’s not just that they lost. It’s that they couldn’t have won. If there had been ten times as many of them, they would still have lost. It’s not a matter of getting close but unlucky. They were never close. They were utterly incapable of winning. I doubt they had an idea of what a “win” would even look like, let alone how to accomplish it. When they started getting shot, they didn’t shoot back - and I don’t think I can credit them with fine trigger discipline, so IMO the more likely reason is lack of killing intent.

Which leads into the question of what kind of intent they did have. There’s a bunch of takes ranging from cynical to downright mocking, suggesting that they were chimplike retards performing chimp dominance displays and got very surprised when the US Government was unimpressed by chimp dominance displays, or perhaps they were operating on habits learned from playing too many video game levels, “Capture the flag and hold out 15 minutes to win!”

My neoreactionary take is: This is your brain on liberalism. They were nominally right-wingers (setting aside eventual fed incitement for a moment), but they’d bought into liberal propaganda about the will of the people, the voice of the unheard, grassroots organizing, the power of protest, et cetera. In the liberal narrative, a protest is something like an extra-strength vote, a way of making politicians move. If you protest hard enough and your heart is pure...

In reality, a protest works if and only if it already has support in high places. The powers that be have wide discretion to pick protests they like or not, and then say: “this protest is the voice of the unheard that we have a moral obligation to grant concessions to; but that protest is a violent treasonous insurrection that we must prosecute as a national security threat”.

So, on the one hand, the MAGA rioters are idiots who deserve to suffer because they got into an ass-kicking contest with a horse. I would have supported the police gunning the MAGA rioters down, same as the BLM riots last year should have been gunned down.

On the other hand, the accusations of “national security threat” and “domestic terrorism” are grossly dishonest. The first because they weren’t a threat, as described above; the second because it’s not terrorism when you target Congress, assuming the rioters were targeting anything.

(I realize some definitions of ‘terrorism’ disagree. They’re dumb, but that’s a tangent from an already long post.)

---

What might a winning strategy have looked like? Hypothetically?

I have never executed a coup, so I cannot speak with certainty.

But let’s imagine that you were in charge of ten times as many MAGA rioters. (”Someone in charge” is another thing they lacked, and another reason their loss was inevitable.) In this scenario, they’re all armed to the teeth and able to coordinate. You lead your irregular bowel movement militia movement to seize the Capitol.

Point 1: The US Army still outnumbers you several hundred to one. If every one of you brought and armed every one of your friends, the US Army would still outnumber you several hundred to one.

Point 2: You control the Capitol. You don’t (yet) control any divisions, jails, courts, banks or TV stations. Your only means for punishing your enemies and exerting power are those you have here, on hand, right now.

Somehow, you need to parlay your control of the Capitol into control of the rest of the US, starting with the army. You can’t feasibly seize the jails or courts from here. You might be able to seize the US Army, though, via the congresscritters. So the first objective should be capturing congresscritters, aiming to catch a majority (technically, a quorum) so you have a pretense of legal grounding. Look to events like Pride’s Purge.

Notice how far this hypothetical is already getting from the Jan 6 mostly-peaceful-protest riot?

So. Assuming the men, the organization, the performance, and the luck of a quorum capture, you then have to coerce Congress into passing what you say. Looking back at point 2, you can’t coerce by any legal, political, social, or vaguely aboveboard means. You have the physically captured congresscritters, no other leverage. Which means that ‘coerce’ probably cashes out to ‘torture and murder’. Which the MAGA rioters didn’t have the stomach for. I infer this from the fact that an outlier-Democrat shot Steve Scalise (R), but the MAGA movement hasn’t even had a single outlier that’s outlying enough to shoot a (D) congresscritter since Trump came on the scene.

But suppose they did, since we’re this far into fantasyland. MAGA rioters hold congresscritters at gunpoint and say “pass and sign the Self-Denying Ordinance or I blow your brains out”, murdering the first few who resist until the rest comply, and get a Self-Denying Ordinance passed which amends the Constitution to dissolve Congress and vests all power in Donald Trump, or the QAnon Shaman, or someone. You did have something like a Self-Denying Ordinance written up beforehand, right? While you’re at it, expand the Supreme Court, and put twelve rioters on it to guarantee a majority to ratify your decisions. Get this all recorded and broadcasted, fast, wide, maybe using the Emergency Alert System.

Now you have a thin veneer of legality. Much like the Declaration of Independence - if you win, they’ll look back in the future and say this is when the new government was formed.

But in the present there’s still fighting to be done, and you might lose.

For example, if you let the congresscritters out, they might congregate elsewhere, and pass a “doesn’t count” motion on the Self-Denying Ordinance they just passed. Or the army might independently decide “doesn’t count” and come in to kill you all, since you’re at war with the old government. You’re going to have to keep the congresscritters as hostages under guard, and think of some way to keep the army out until it settles into your newly passed control. “Hope you get lucky” is one way; maybe the army will be confused or internally split about what to do. It’s not a very good way.

Do you know any regiments loyal to you? No? Any battalions, then? What about mercenaries, can you at least hire mercenaries? No, can’t afford it? Any foreign countries willing to send their army to protect you? No, that would probably piss off the US army even more.

But suppose, by plot device, the US army stays away or is kept away for a while, and you keep hold of your congresscritters, and eventually the Self-Denying Ordinance settles in as the new law of the land dictating who is supreme power.

Now, there’s still district attorneys letting off blacks for murder and charging whites for microaggression, and journalists inciting race war, and PayPal has partnered with the ADL to limit who gets access to the financial system, and there’s professors teaching How The White Cis-Hetero Patriarchy Stole Your Gender classes, and school certification boards requiring diversity commitments, et cetera, and these are the people who run the daily operations of your nation and teach your children and successors. Do you know the word lustration? Unless you lustrate these people, they’re going to reverse your coup, or simply never implement it in the first place. Following through on the coup requires lustrating millions of people wielding informal power.

In conclusion, the machinery of a modern government is huge, most of it not located in the Capitol. Storming the US Capitol is nowhere near a coup - let this be my message to both leftists, there’s no reason to panic about the allegedly attempted coup, and to rightists, you’re wasting time and lives if you don’t think about the next steps.

[bqstqnbruin]

Why the bruins locker room is toxic? Sorry I'm not a bruins fans

To start, I’m aware no one will probably read this because they’ll see Bruins and scroll past it but I hope people actually do, even if it is to just disagree with me. This is from the perspective of a die hard Bruins fan. I’m from New England, I only get Bruins games broadcasted with our cable package. I grew up with them. They are my men, always have been, always will be. I have also talked about this with friends who hate the Bruins, who are Flyers, Devils, or Capitals fans, and they all agree with what I’m saying, so I would like to hope this isn’t taken as a biased rant. Anyone is free to message me about this and we can talk about it (but I have a paper due in 14 hours on American education during the Great Depression so it might have to wait until tomorrow night).

So I’ve been saying that sarcastically first and foremost. I just reblogged this post which has direct quotes from the article I’m referencing but here’s my little summary: 

Basically an article in the Athletic came out in May saying that the Bruins bully and “abuse” Jake DeBrusk, right after Akim Aliu’s post about the actual abuse he and other players of color have faced in the NHL. Obviously, given the time, this is very bad, because abuse is not something that should ever be joked about, and if it is something that actually happens, then it should be talked about in the appropriate manner. When you read the article, it talks about how the boys chirp Jake, which he said he enjoys, and then, in turn, chirps back. He also chirps himself. The guys in the locker room know who can handle a chirp and who can’t, so if you’re one of the guys who can’t, they don’t do it. Literally, every friend group teases each other, if you have a good group of friends and they know you don’t enjoy it, then hopefully, they don’t and won’t do it to you. The Bruins are an example of this friend group.

People took this as the entire locker room bullies Jake, so now everyone who hates the Bruins (which is most people which like fine I understand: I’m a Boston fan who lives in Philadelphia, I’ve been verbally and physically attacked for it) is saying “Jake to Seattle” or “Jake isn’t treated right by his team,” or my favorite, “Jake deserves better” when he has said time and time again he loves the guys and doesn’t want to leave Boston. 

When you watch any video or read any other article about the Bruins, the people who are on the team now or were on the team in the past talk about how much they love each other. I think it was Marcus Johansson (who played for the Bruins last season ? the season before ? idk, I have no sense of time [and yes, my friends tease me for it because I tease myself about it]) who talked about how the entire team was one large friend group, that you could hang out with anyone at any time, that there were no cliques, no groups or players that exclusively hung out with others and excluded their teammates. Craig Smith, our newly acquired man just said in his welcome interview how Bergy talks about how much he loves his team. If you look at all the goodbye posts for Torey, they’re all heartbreaking and lovey for him and he reflects that love back for the team (even though management did him dirty but that’s another story aka the business of hockey). If you want, I can and will find the examples I’m referencing, but like I said it has to wait until tomorrow because of my paper. 

It just personally pisses me off because people took the one article, which was posted at such an insensitive time, and ran with it and won’t let it go. No one liked Jake as much before they thought he was being ‘bullied.’ If you go and look at the Athletic article now, the title has been changed and it has an editors note saying the original title was misleading and insensitive and has been changed for that reason. I know this is going to sound like a whiney Bruins fan, so fine, take that as such if you want to, but if this were to be reported about any other team, people would be jumping and saying hey wait, this isn’t true, people outside the immediate fanbase of whichever team is in question.

So long story short, I’m being a slightly annoying sarcastic bitch (which I am a lot, but normally not on here like I am being right now I am so sorry), and the locker room is not toxic, people just aren’t looking at the whole story, and I really do wish they would. Jake loves Boston and we love him.  

[kinetic-elaboration]

September 13: 1x14 Balance of Terror

A little late this week because Friday didn’t work out but here I am with my liveblog (ish) of Balance of Terror.

This is the one that starts off with Kirk officiating a wedding, which is adorable. He loves this part of his job. He loves love so much!

Also they’re going to broadcast this important event through the whole ship. And Scotty is walking the bride down the aisle, which is so on point for him.

Sulu, shut up. Kirk’s busy officiating here. He broke out the romantic lighting on his eyes and everything.

The Earth-Romulan War, over a century ago. That’s a long time. Interesting that it wasn’t a Federation war, although Spock mentions allies. Either that was pre-Federation within canon, or pre-Federation in the writing of Star Trek, or if it really was just an Earth war. Were Vulcans allies?

I’m just....... eternally fascinated by Romulans. It fascinates me too that this whole history is ALSO the background to the Kelvin attack in AOS, which is 35ish years before this. So at the time, the Romulan war had happened, but Earth didn’t know what Romulans looked like, and then one shows up on this big-ass ship and just destroys a Federation vessel for no reason. It’s not even clear if they knew Nero was a Romulan if I remember correctly. Basically my point is that AOS should have done way more with this.

Also outposts on asteroids.

This engaged couple is adorable.

A space vessel attacked your outpost? A space vessel? In space? How could it be??

Spock’s make up on point as usual.

Time to screen share.

“Their invisibility screen must work both ways.”

Kirk is so smart and has such a great command presence. I love him.

Today’s one allotted use of Kirk’s first name by Spock: “The exact heading a Romulan vessel would take JIM.”

I mean it was obviously a Romulan attack lol. I know from the last ep Kirk really likes to be sure of stuff but who else could it possibly be??

Stiles suggests there could be Romulan spies on the Enterprise, for reasons I missed because I was busy thinking about how he was dumb. I respect Kirk for listening to his men when they’re being smart but on further reflection... how the heck would Romulan spies get on a Federation ship?? Also nothing ever came of this so...

Dun dun dun, big reveal! Everyone’s so shocked and Spock is like initially surprised and then faintly resigned. “I know how this is gonna go... brace for racism.”

Alternately: “...Dad?”

Yeah, Kirk, shoot down that bigotry on the bridge. “I said I’m sure you’re complimenting my husband on his decoding abilities, RIGHT?”

Spock probably could decode the message though.

...Thinking about it now, did they ever decode the message? Or was it just important for like figuring out where the ship was or that it still existed even though invisible or whatever?

Cry me a river about wanting to go home, Romulan Commander, you were the one who crossed into Federation territory and attacked outposts for no reason lol. “I can’t believe our acts of war are going to lead to war.”

He’s like Romulan Pike. So world weary and dramatic. “Danger and I are old companions.”

Stiles is all like “well Spock’s an expert on Romulans” but he’s not an expert? He’s just making up what he knows about them based on very old Vulcan history.

I know later “canon” killed this theory but I took Spock’s reference to Vulcan’s colonizing past as him guessing that perhaps Vulcan colonized a planet and then forgot about it, and those colonists missed out on the Surakian revolution. And I find this pretty hilarious so I’m just gonna stick to it.

Romulan Commander would not get along well with Nero. Here he is waxing all poetic and stuff. Bet he’s never met a miner in his life.

Kirk’s profile when he’s looking down... you can see why CPine was a good choice to reboot him.

Lol random Janice Rand. Just here to hug Kirk since Spock is too busy being on the floor.

What the heck was that with Spock and Stiles? He just shows up at the navigator’s station like “Hey. I dare you to be racist right now.”

People who don’t like Kirk need to watch this ep, along with the Corbomite Maneuver. His gravitas, his sense of command.

RIP Centurion.

The Romulan Commander is so “oh woe is me, I am so far from home, I only wish to see my familiar stars again” but BITCH you left home! You attacked people for no reason!

Enterprise after dark.

Kirk just lying around, looking handsome. Resting handsomely.

Taking out Chris Pine’s tiny violin while Kirk whines about command.

When McCoy started in on his speech, my mom was like “McCoy has been drinking” and honestly......lol and she’s probably not wrong. He’s still being sweet though.

Spock what the hell man. Stop being so awkward and clumsy, bitch.

“He reads the thoughts in my brain.”

Woah forgot the part of this where they blow up a literal nuclear warhead.

Sulu’s into this Navigator Uhura thing. Real step up from Stiles.

Commander’s so fed up with this Decius bitch.

Spock runs like a dork, too. Still there to save the day and Stiles’s ass though!

Firing the phasers isn’t very pacifist of him.

“In a different reality, I could have called you a friend.” They should have rebooted him, and had him meet CPine’s Kirk.

No, not Tomlinson!!

The irony of the groom dying is the part I remember from this ep, that Kirk did a good job, destroyed his enemy, avoided the neutral zone, and got away with only one casualty--but that casualty was the man who was about to get married--but the actual literal ending is bizarre. “There there, crewman... okay time to get back to work.”

Then striding through the halls alone.

I love this episode and it holds up, although I sometimes missed the finer points of their maneuvering. I think this is partly because there’s a lot of technical stuff going on along with a lot of other stuff in the span of less than an hour and partly because this is SUPER space Navy, like one of the straight up Naviest episodes they ever did, and Naval battle narratives is not a genre I’m super familiar with.

There is way more to unpack here than I am really up for lol. First, while I love Kirk and Kirk-centric eps and the whole ‘he and the Commander are so similar they basically have a telepathic connection’ stuff... there’s a lot of barely touched upon Spock stuff here. My mom and I are disagreeing about how much he knew. She thinks he did know what Romulans look like, or that at the very least some Vulcans, like important Vulcans (and we know Spock is important) would have to know, because the whole concept of katras makes it impossible for them as a people to really forget anything. But I think it’s more interesting, and more in keeping with what this episode implies, if Spock specifically did not know. So this is a big reveal for him. And then in addition to dealing with Stiles’s shit, he has to assimilate that an Earth/Federation enemy is a relative of his people. And it’s a glimpse into the pre-Reform era, which you know even Vulcans have gotta be fascinated by. AND his positions in this episode are just... not super pacifist. Like the stuff he has to advocate, and actively do, like in firing the phasers and so on, is exactly what his dad warned him about when he was like ‘hey I’m gonna join the military, peace out.’ Then there’s the added wrinkle that the Romulans probably also don’t know what the Vulcans look like and Spock is conveniently never around for the Romulan Commander to see him. Not that he could take the info back with him, but they never have any confrontation even between them. So that’s a lot right there.

If this were a S2 or S3 ep, it would have been Spock-centric.

Literally can’t believe there were only 2 Romulan centric eps in the whole of TOS lol. Major missed opportunity there.

Next ep (hopefully this Friday!) is Shore Leave. In which McCoy has 3 ladies and Kirk has a homoerotic wrestle in the dirt with a man and somehow everyone still thinks he’s the space slut.

[gevejsbvdj]

Pt. 2

the continuation of what inspired my leave beneath the cut

I have a friend, who I got along with really well because we are both Afro Latinas (only she can speak Spanish. I don’t, not really) and we are black kids who had an interest in unconventional topics. I messaged her before disappearing about the ending of the server. I was keeping her updated all throughout, but after telling her the ending, I left her on read

I won’t disclose what I got up to during my absence. But again, don’t think that I had a breakdown because of the server ONLY. It was the final straw. I had so much going on in my life and I couldn’t take it anymore. 

Anyways, she took it upon herself to send hateful messages to Ley’s account and thought it was something to be proud of and told me. I...wasn’t impressed. But I still didn’t respond to our chats. Then she (her name is Rex. I’m gonna call her that) dmed Ley and was actually pretty aggressive towards her in an attempt to get answers. Again, not impressed but it was enough for me to actually come online. I feel like that’s why she acted out, to get me online. I don’t think she cared about me and used my pain to hurt others.

I had extremely brief, passing conversations with people who weren’t involved with the situation at all right before I messaged Rex. 

Ley was special to me before her message. I was always very defensive and protective of her like I was everyone else, but her especially because I thought she was nice. And I remembered when people were being mean to me, she reached out. And I still appreciate her for doing that. 

Which was why it was so confusing when Rex told me that they were all mad at me because I ACCUSED JOANE OF GROOMING PEOPLE. They wanted a reason to make me the villain so badly that they made shit up.

Notice how here, she says that I called Joane a FUCKING PEDO. Not even just a groomer but an outright PEDOPHILE. 

I’ve been raped. I’ve been sexually assaulted, groomed, all of that. I don’t say shit. I never say anything. I’ve even been accused- yes, ACTUALLY ACCUSED unlike Joane- to being a paedophile. I’m 19. Not even just that but I’m freshly 19. I got accused when I was 17. But I would never just- ughhhh moving on I don’t wanna get into it. 

When Rex asked for proof, this is way Ley sent her:

In this screenshot, I’m literally discussing how Joane’s childish behaviour could get her killed. I was concerned. Again, where’s the bullying?

Rex told me that Ley said she was wrong for not having proof, and I understand. Ley wasn’t present when it all went down

But really Ley? 

I heard a quote from someone that said something like “if someone believed a lie about you without checking up on you first to see if there was proof, then they were already looking for something to destroy you with to begin with” or SOMETHING like that. So I thought back to that quote and felt awful. I always suspected that they didn’t really like me, but always marked it up to my depression talking nonsense. But after all of this...maybe it was true. Why did I come out the most damage? Why were they making up lies about me? Me, out of all of them. Why was I consistently being seen as the bad guy overall? No really tell me. 

Anyways, this was Ley’s justification to believe that I would say such an awful thing:

Okay. Let’s just say that- Joane WAS a groomer. That she actually is a paedophile and I commented on it. She’s obviously not but I’m pulling a Ben Shapiro here. Everything else is the same only Joane is a paedophile. 

That motherfucking “it’s weird that he only spoke up when they were arguing” argument, and other arguments like that are so fucking toxic. As well as “well it wasn’t a problem that never came up before” so??? That’s what the fucking #metoo movement was all about. Timing means NOTHING when it comes to that. It doesn’t matter if it’s Joane or fucking Bill Cosby. The fact that thought came to Ley’s head is so fucking upsetting and DISGUSTING.THAT mentality is why people never want to believe victims of assault. Same goes for “they could have said that privately” guys she’s talking about that user who said they were uncomfortable with Joane coming onto him. Privately? It was private to him. In that server, we’ve made it known that it’s a very homey and comfortable environment. And who the fuck are you to tell someone where and when they can speak up about something like that???

Also, she accused me of calling her a pedo again. Good for me right? I’m a bully and I’m someone who just blindly calls people paedophiles. Good for me, damn. 

No, you shouldn’t believe someone right away when they call someone a groomer. God don’t I know that. But you definitely don’t say THAT what the fucking fuck. 

Jesus. Okay, moving on. 

Rex aggressively messaged Mel who had something similar to say:

uggh, you WERE the toxic environment i wanted to flee from,.

It hurts. It hurts a lot to see another friend you looked up to call you a bully. And that they just say that you called someone a groomer when you didn’t. 

Mel couldn’t provide proof either. 

Mel also tagged her post with someone kinda ignorant. 

Imagine if (thinking of someone I and others don’t always agree with) someone like James Charles made a post broadcasting all the homophobia he dealt with during his career, and I or some other asshole said something “while I don’t always agree with James…” like now isn’t the time. Now isn’t the time to let people you know you disagree with me ESPECIALLY on a post where you agree with me 100%??? What is the point then? You agreed with me, so agree with me. There. No one is saying that you have to agree with everything I say lord fucking knows I don’t always agree with you guys. fucking DUH. It makes me think you just wanted to put that in to lesson me and my words, even only slightly. Why? That hurts a lot, Mel. It really fucking does bruh.

When Rex called her out on it, she deleted the reblog. Not just the meagre little tag but the whole post. If she couldn’t be slick with me, then she wasn’t going to support me at all. It isn’t worth it if she can’t be shady. That’s the message I got from that. Tells me a lot. 

I am not friends with Rex anymore. She’s always been really aggressive and drama craving and I can’t take it. It’s impacting me negatively as well. But I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t somewhat happy with the screenshots she gave me. Told me a lot about these people I was still willing to talk to. 

Now? I won’t even waste their time.

After all of that. I made the post. The big announcement post. It was too much. I can’t escape the racism in my hometown or in the country in general, but I can leave and distance myself from the fandom. 

I was talking to someone today, and she, as a white woman, admitted that white people act so shitty when it’s implied that they’re racist. Which is so true. 

As I said, people make mistakes. No white person EVER is 0% racist or biased. I’m sorry but it’s not true unless you’re a baby or something. Same goes for other races, but mainly white people who have always had the upper hand, the privilege, the money, the chances, the power, all of that. 

Listen to me. 

When a person of color tells you that you are being microaggressive, biased, ignorant, or prejudice, or straight up RACIST, YOU FUCKING LISTEN TO THEM. Why do you guys get so AGGRESSIVE AND MAD?? That is so fucking WEIRD. 

And yes. I’m talking to you Vulture. 

I really had no ill feelings towards you prior to your comments.

Or your posts. 

peep that clumsily used aave. never fucking talked like that to anyone but me. either way, you sound dumb.

Why?

Why so...mad?

You felt guilty? Why did you feel guilty? 

...I’m gonna let you answer that. 

Moving on. I know that not everything has to be about race. I hate making things about my race. I do, even when I should! But you can be racist unintentionally. Does that mean you’re racist? No! I have yet to receive a genuine apology from any of you, meanwhile, I’ve been over here grovelling and hoping that you like me again. God. Why is it so hard for you to apologize and move on??

No, in that same fucking server, someone sent a racist meme after joking about slavery all day:

And yes, the people in the chat at the time laughed at it... 

I told them that WASNT funny and they freaked out all “WHY CANT I TALK TO PEOPLE IM SO FUCKING STUPID I SUCK” like oh...my god. You guys make it so awkward being black oh my GOD. I- like it makes me never want to say ANYTHING but I know I have to but god what the hell guys???

I wouldn’t really think that the members of the server chat were racially biased if they just accepted the fact that they were micro aggressive and didn’t flip out about it. Not really, at least. That reaction is so- well it’s sus as fuck. People who aren’t prejudiced will apologize, correct themselves and move on. Not dismiss me constantly and DEFINITELY not freak the fuck out. 

I also wouldn’t assume they were racially biased if this SAME EXACT SITUATION DIDNT HAPPEN TO ME BEFORE. 

Yep! On the Beatles Amino, I was called a bully and was reported by the LEADERS. Why? Because I told a curator she was inconsistent with her rules… that’s it. And that was back when I was sugary sweet all the time and was deemed to be a cinnamon roll. Nah. They knew I was black and I got told that people were scared of me and that I was bullying people. Yeah okay. Messaging ONE curator about her rules is the same thing as bullying people. Chile I can’t. And it only happens in the Beatles fandom. But no when someone calls John Lennon a racist it’s all “Zach! Zach! Tell them they’re wrong.” Ugh...

So that’s that on that. I have nothing else to say. Don’t message me about this post if you didn’t read all of this. I’m an idiot and I’m honestly still willing you hear you all out but don’t expect me to ever want to have anything to do with you. Out of the what- 50 people from that server, only two stood up for me? And two separate people APOLOGIZED TO ME. AND THEY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING. That’s a shame. Thank you Johnny, Lenny, Laurie, and Remy. All of your names rhyme and you didn’t make me feel like I was CRAZY, unlike those I mentioned. There’s so much shit going on in the world rn, especially to do with racism. I know that you guys know. But some posts really....really tried me. oh well. I’m black. I like The Beatles. And I’m a victim of microaggressions, false accusations, gas lighting. I’m also out. bye.

black lives matter resources

[eternalstann]

Two Of Us

In which Peter Parker watches over you after a new threat to the avengers emerges. With just the two of you, who knows what could happen.

Pairing: Peter Parker X Reader

Word count: 1.4k

Warnings: Sexual References, Eventual Smut, Strong Language

________________________________

"Dad!" You called through the compound. You peeked your head into different rooms looking for your father, he was a hard man to miss, being the God of Thunder and all. "Yes my love" you heard him respond from the kitchen. Finally; sometimes you resented how huge the compound was. "I wanted to eat breakfast with you" you spoke, sitting down at the island next to him. He smiled down at you, pulling you to his side. He loved you more than anything in the world. After losing literally all of his family he cherished you deeply. Your father genuinely was your best friend.

"What do you want to eat?" He asked standing up and walking to fridge. "Hmmm, how about some eggs and bacon" you hummed. You wanted something quick. He was leaving for a mission with the other avengers tonight and you wanted to spend some time with him before he left. Thor hummed in approval at your pick. He was about to say something when Natasha and Steve walked in. "Goodmorning!" They both chirped in unison. "Aww best friend goals!" You laughed, you jumped when another voice joined in laughing with you. It was Peter. You felt proud that you had made him laugh. You weren't afraid to admit that you had a teeny-tiny crush on the boy. How could you not? He was handsome, sweet, funny and extremely smart. Plus he was the only other person your age at the compound, so there's that.

"Ahh, Goodmorning friends. Would you like breakfast?" Your dad offered to the bunch as they all sat down as well. "Sounds great, thanks" Steve replied, flicking on the T.V to watch the news. "Ugh, old man. No one wants to watch the news" Natasha wines grabbing the remote. She was about to change the channel when suddenly static covered the screen before cutting to the image of a masked man sitting with his hands clasped together. You all stopped to look a the strange spectacle on the screen. "This is a message for the avengers. You're time is up. Earth will be reclaimed..." all of you furrowed your brows not believing your eyes.

The man continued on, and Natasha quickly began hooking up equipment you assumed to try and track the source of the signal. The man began naming each avenger individually. "Clint Barton, Thor Odinson, and Tony Stark. Surrender now or lose what you hold dearest. There's no need for children to die" The room went silent as the broadcast cut out. "How the hell did he know about the Kids" Steve wondered aloud. You wanted to interject that actually you were legally considered an adult but you figured now probably wasn't the time.

"Was I hallucinating or did you guys just see that too?" Tony asked walking into the kitchen with you all. "We saw it" Peter spoke, looking over at you. He was trying to gage your reaction. Someone had just threatened your life. "We need to get the kids out of here, I'll take Morgan and Y/N to Clint's until we figure this out" Tony began, already piecing a plan together. "No, we should split them up. They're like sitting ducks if we keep them together" Natasha disagreed. "Clint is home with his children. They should be okay for a little while. I haven't noticed any breeches. Tony you should send Morgan with Pepper as soon as possible, as far away as possible" she continued. The group all nodded in approval.

“Pepper is on vacation with her sister in Guam, even if I send the quinjet it’s going to take at least a day and a half for her to get here” Tony sighed. “And Y/N-” you cut Natasha off before she could finish. “I’m an adult and I can take care of myself, you guys never have any faith in me. I’m stronger than you think” Being the daughter of the God of thunder came with a few perks, like being able to control all weather. Not very well yet but you had a decent handle on it. Enough to fend for yourself in a dangerous situation. “This is not a game” your father spoke, voice low. “Now is not the time to try and prove yourself daughter” his voice a little softer this time.

“Y/N’s got a point, she can hold her own for a day or two. And frankly, the compound might be the safest place for her right now, until we get some sort of lead. She and Morgan can stay here until Pepper gets home, and then we can send them to more secure locations” Tony spoke and you smiled at his words. Not only did he believe in your strength, he was trusting you to look over Morgan. He’d always been like an uncle to you, and one of the closet to you of the avengers besides Natasha and Peter. Though you loved everyone dearly, he saw your interest in technology and science and taught you many things through long days in the lab with him, and sometimes Peter as well.

You glanced at your father, his face was impassive. “Dad I’ll be fine” you whispered, placing a hand on his shoulder. “I’m just not comfortable leaving you here with just Morgan.” He muttered looking in your eyes.

“I’ll stay with her” Peter spoke up, sending you a smile. Your heart raced at the thought of being in the compound with just you and Peter; and Morgan of course. You rarely had alone time. Your father was still hesitant but agreed. “Great, Princess Storm and Underoos will hold down the fort while we’re gone” Tony clapped his hands together. You rolled your eyes at the goofy nicknames Tony had for the two of you. “Just don’t let Morgan eat candy for breakfast or something” Tony laughed, he always found a way to lighten the mood.

Your father and the rest of the avengers left to go get started on a mission outline, except Peter. “Looks like we’ve got baby duty” Peter laughed sitting down next to you. “Don’t let Morgan hear you call her a baby she’d lose her mind” you reply, looking over at him. His hair was a little messy, sticking up on his head. He still looked gorgeous though. He wore a tight white t shirt that complimented his tan, and grey sweats. You could see the outline of his abs through his shirt and the outline of something else in his pants. Someone had just threatened to kill you and you were staring at his dick. You shook your head, bringing your eyes back to his face. You were grateful he hadn’t seemed to have noticed where your gaze was just a few seconds ago. “She really is a character, I told her I thought you looked pretty the other day and she said ‘well duh your a bug and she’s a princess. Of course you do’ What four year old comes up with something like that?” He asked.

You rose an eyebrow, “you think I’m pretty, Parker” you asked. “I think you’re beautiful” he shrugged. “A year ago you told me my haircut made look like a lesbian farmer!” You shouted, pushing his shoulder. “Well it did! You were a pretty lesbian farmer though. But a lot has changed in a year..” he trailed off before pretending to push up his imaginary boobs. “Oh my God” you exclaimed. You had...developed a lot more. You went from a scrawny teen to a solid woman, your hips had widened and chest filled out. Even your face had matured. “A lot has changed with you too” you smirked, gesturing to his body. You ran a finger down his chest, letting it slide down until you reached the waistline of his pants.

He stopped your hand, letting out a nervous chuckle. “We have an audience” he mumbled, nodding his head for you to look behind you. A smile grew across your face & you stood at the sight of Morgan. “Y/N!” She squealed, running to you. You scooped her up, and squeezed her in a hug. “I missed you. I love your hugs” she murmured, burying her face into your neck. “I love her hugs too!” Peter bellowed, wrapping his arms around you and hugging you from behind. He pressed his erection into your ass before whispering in your ear, “This is going to be a fun couple of days”

__________________________

PART 2!!!

okay so I’m thinking about turning this into my first miniseries, fluff with Peter, Morgan and you. And of course, it couldn’t be my work without lots of smut! I wanna do another miniseries as well so send me in ideas if you want! Let me know if you’re interested in this concept or if I should just make a part two and be done! Love you all❤️

[winterskywrites]

Hey, darling, what do you think about Lena Luthor? Like, she IS absolutely brilliant, super gorgeous, powerful and so cool, and she absolutely doesn't deserve that toxic and manipulative family, but the writers could already started the process to her get better of that trust issues. It's hard for anyone be understanding and patient all the time, especially when the other person doesn't do the same thing for you. I hope she gets better, cause she deserves to be happy.

Honestly, my feelings towards Lena, at least at the moment, are not nearly as positive as yours seem to be. At the moment, I firmly believe that she’s acting like a villain. I’m putting the rest of my response under a cut, but please be warned that it’s not particularly Lena friendly.

(And anon, please know that my response is not trying to attack you; I’m only trying to answer your question.)

Edit - I misinterpreted parts of the original message; the clarification is here.

So, here’s the thing about Lena: She seems fairly incapable of seeing morality in shades of gray. With Lena, you’re either with her or you’re against her; you’re either good, or you’re evil. (And Lena tends to be somewhat self-obsessed, so if you’re against her, you’re also probably evil.) We’ve seen this with her multiple times, but her current conflict with Kara is probably the best example of it. Kara didn’t tell her that she was Supergirl (which was one hundred percent Kara’s choice, I will die on that hill), and now Lena is convinced that Kara was never her friend at all and that Kara was never really that good a hero in the first place. Even after Kara did tell Lena her identity at the beginning of the season, as well as an explanation of why she hadn’t done it previously, Lena is completely unswayed. Kara “betrayed” her, so thus Kara is against her, so thus Kara is bad.

Now, I’m not saying that it’s a bad thing to feel upset when you feel that someone doesn’t trust you. However, in this situation, you also need to take the other person’s intentions into account, and this is something that Lena doesn’t seem willing or capable of doing. We can look at her relationship with Andrea as an example here: Andrea took the medallion and lied to Lena about it, which seems like a betrayal on the surface, but we know that she did it to save her father. When Lena learns this, it doesn’t seem to change her opinion on Andrea at all. She still thinks that Andrea betrayed her, and she still seems to consider that an inexcusable offense. Even when Andrea apologizes to her in tears, Lena still continues with her plan to manipulate her. Again, this is an example of Lena’s black and white thinking - Andrea betrayed her, so thus she’s bad, full stop, despite any reasoning she may have had.

The real reason that this black and white view of morality is a problem is that Lena is using it as an excuse for her Non Nocere project, which is, in my opinion, flat out morally wrong. Lena wants to use her technology to manipulate other people’s minds without their consent. She kidnapped Eve and used her technology to override her entire mind, and then kidnapped Ma’alefa’ak and used his powers against him. She planned to broadcast Non Nocere worldwide using Myriad, thus mind-controlling the entire world. She’s been working with Lex, perhaps the worst villain in the entire Arrowverse, to come up with a way to block people from feeling emotions that she deems bad. She used Non Nocere to remove feelings of injustice and framed that like it was a good thing. What Lena’s doing is wrong. She’s allowed to feel however she feels regarding Kara and Andrea, but she can’t use those feelings to justify doing evil, and Non Nocere is, in my opinion, evil.

Now, I am aware that Lena had an awful childhood and that many her reactions can be traced back to that, but while that might explain them, it does not excuse them. Like you said, Lena doesn’t deserve her toxic and manipulating family, because absolutely no one deserves that, but that doesn’t make what she’s doing okay. The fact that Lena has experienced trauma does not mean she can do whatever she wants without consequences. I don’t really agree that the writers have started the process of her getting better with her trust issues; I don’t really think there’s been much growth there at all, and any growth that Lena may have had in the past seasons has been lost in this current one. Of course, working through issues like hers is often not a linear process, but it seems like, as of season five, Lena has lost any desire or motivation to work through her trust issues, and that’s a problem. What Lena really needs right now is therapy (like Kara suggested to her earlier in the season), but to make that work, you need to accept that you have a problem and be willing to work through it, and to me, it doesn’t seem like Lena fulfills either criterion.

You said, “It’s hard for anyone be understanding and patient all the time, especially when the other person doesn’t do the same thing for you.” I absolutely agree with the sentiment, but I don’t think it particularly applies to Lena. I don’t feel like Lena has ever put that much effort into being understanding and patient, and I think that her friends tend to put much more effort into it than she does. Honestly, I think the character who best exemplifies this idea is Kara, who is always understanding and patient, sometimes to her own detriment, even when the other person puts absolutely no effort into doing the same. It took Kara weeks to stop begging Lena to forgive her, and even now, Kara seems entirely willing to forgive Lena for everything that she’s done if Lena even indicates that she wants such a thing. I think Lena is the one who needs to be more understanding and patient more than perhaps any other character on the show (other than the die-hard villains like Lex and Leviathan, of course).

You described Lena as, “absolutely brilliant, super gorgeous, powerful and so cool.” I don’t really disagree with any of those points, but none of them are inherently good things. Lena is brilliant, but she’s currently using her brilliance to come up with a way to manipulate people’s minds. Lena is gorgeous, but that has no correlation with her being a good or bad person. Lena is powerful, but again, she’s using her power to do things that are morally wrong. (I don’t care what Lex said, I’m not convinced that those prisoners from a jail owned by the Luthors decided to be test subjects entirely of their own free will without any outside influence.) And Lena can be pretty cool, but again, that doesn’t make her good. I also hope that Lena gets better, because I do like the prevailing theme on Supergirl that no one is ever fully beyond redemption, and I also think that she deserves to be happy, because I think everyone deserves at least the chance to be happy, but Lena is currently one of the villains of this season, and if she’s going to be anything else, she needs to put some serious work into her redemption.

Basically, tl;dr, Lena has a very black and white view of morality, and she’s using that as an excuse to do things that are morally wrong, like Non Nocere. While her issues don’t make her a villain on their own, the way she’s choosing to react to them does. Lena is not beyond redemption, but she is currently a villain.

[stevishabitat]

“These are the perils of working from home,” mutters David Tennant, typing into his phone, filmed by his computer and watched, bemusedly, by me.

The 49-year-old actor has been texting, intermittently and apologetically, throughout our Zoom call. One of his five children (aged 18, nine, seven, four and eight months) has returned to school, and it seems pickup arrangements have been miscommunicated.

Tennant’s correspondent – I assume it is his wife, Georgia – is messaging from inside the house; Tennant is in the garden, his long lockdown locks pushed back into a Beckham-style headband. Over yonder, he gestures off-camera, a homeschooling lesson is under way: “I came outside to avoid the maths.”

Yet Tennant seems to have embraced the realities of home life, with two BBC projects drawing on his experience of raising a family. In the meta, of-the-moment series Staged, he and Georgia play versions of themselves in lockdown in their Chiswick home, while There She Goes (which returns for a second series tomorrow) captures an oft-unspoken truth about parenting, says Tennant: that “it’s sort of a slog”.

Coupled with doing interviews from his garden – Tennant tips his camera to show me Myrtle the cockapoo, flopped at his feet – it offers a surprising glimpse into the family life of an actor who has previously been reluctant to reveal any of it.

“We’re not quite as squeamish as we were,” he agrees, not least because his eldest son, Ty, is now also an actor. “I don’t think we’ll ever be sharing pictures of our children in Hello! magazine, but I think a lot of that comes from an insecurity about being uncovered or invaded. The longer you’re together, the less that feels like a threat.”

Tennant met Georgia (then Moffett) in 2008 on the set of Doctor Who – her father is a former Doctor, Pete Davison. “As our relationship was born out of people trying to stick lenses through windows, it’s taken us a long time to slough off that residual nervousness about sharing anything.”

These days, their guard is low enough for Georgia to post on Instagram a shot of herself breastfeeding – and to rail against Mark Zuckerberg when the image was removed by Facebook for breaching community standards (“I’ll come round there and squirt you in the eye”).

But, Tennant adds: “It’s still important to us that the characters in Staged are not us,” “David” being “more pathetic” than Tennant and “Georgia” more indulgent of him. “We’re not telling the actual story of our private life.”

There She Goes, however, he praises as scrupulously honest. The comedy stars Tennant and Jessica Hynes as parents of a child with a severe learning disability, based on the experience of the writers Shaun Pye and Sarah Crawford with their daughter, who was born with an extremely rare (and still undiagnosed) chromosomal disorder.

Tennant plays Simon, the character Pye based on himself: a loving but somewhat hapless father, always out to foist young Rosie on to his wife so he can head down the pub. Tennant says he tried to catch Pye out on set: “I’d go: ‘This bit we’re doing today – that didn’t really happen, did it?’ And everything is true.”

The first series was widely praised for refusing to sugarcoat the realities of parenting and marriage, while still finding moments of sweetness. Hynes won a Bafta for her turn as Emily, Rosie’s harried but devoted mum who, in a low moment, admits to struggling to love her newborn.

Simon, meanwhile, leans on booze and dark humour. There She Goes can be an undeniably uncomfortable watch. But the dual narratives of each episode – switching between a challenging but joyful time for the family and a more desperate early one – provide relief and perspective.

Tennant considers the series a mainstream comedy. Yet there had been trepidation within the BBC about how it would be received, he says, “because it lacked a certain sentimentality and political correctness – there was a real fear”. He disdainfully recalls a journalist at the press launch playing devil’s advocate, warning of a coming “shitstorm”: “He said: ‘You are going to be destroyed for putting this on television.’ We all hoped he was wrong – but we feared that he might be right.” And this was after the huge critical success of the police drama Broadchurch, which might easily have convinced Tennant he could do no wrong.

The casting of a non-disabled actor as nine-year-old Rosie – who is non-verbal, with the mental age of a toddler – was one sensitivity, says Tennant. The possibility of casting an actor with a learning disability had been explored, he says, “because, of course, that’s a live issue and one that has to be rightly unpicked”. But the demands of the role were found to be too great for a young actor with a disability. “Anyone who appreciates the kind of challenges that a child like Rosie would have doesn’t doubt that it would not really have been possible.”

Miley Locke, who is now 11, was “an incredible find”, says Tennant, praising her as nimble and uninhibited in a challenging role. Locke has met Jo, on whom Rosie is based, and has “an incredible capacity to find the truth of that character”, he says. “She’s also very game – I’m endlessly having to pick her up and fling her about and yank her around …”

Any parent will identify with “that constant sense that you’re falling short”, he says – now, perhaps, more than ever. A scene in which Emily tries desperately to work in the face of Rosie’s demands has taken on new relevance during lockdown. “Well, quite,” says Tennant, while texting in response to the latest news from Georgia. “Erm. Sorry …”

A big part of the challenge of shooting Staged was finding moments when the children were “either asleep or quiet”, but Tennant counts himself as “phenomenally fortunate” to have had the work, given how acting has been affected by the pandemic. This October, he was due to appear in CP Taylor’s play Good; that now seems unlikely.

Even when theatres are able to reopen, Tennant does not foresee audiences flocking back, “to sit there watching three hours of Chekhov as someone coughs all over them”. The impact on British culture could be catastrophic, he fears, even for institutions such as the National Theatre and the Royal Shakespeare Company. “It’s a huge bill just to keep those buildings running … We could be left with a cultural scene that’s vastly changed, and that’s a huge part of who we are as a nation.

“Even if the theatre is of no interest to you, even if it feels like an elitist playground, it’s places like that that all the other creative industries feed off,” he says, adding that the arts make a significant contribution to the UK economy – nearly £11bn in 2016, more than agriculture.

Tennant’s career first developed in theatre. As a teenager in Paisley, the son of a Presbyterian minister, he became one of the youngest students at the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama. Even as his work in television and film has taken off, Tennant continues to be a regular on stage, especially with the RSC.

It faces a “titanic problem” in the pandemic, he says, having furloughed 90% of its staff. Government intervention is needed to support theatres until they can reopen, he says, but he is sceptical of it materialising. “If one felt more inclined to trust this government, one might relax, but they haven’t exactly covered themselves in glory thus far.” In fact, since I spoke to Tennant, the government has promised the arts and heritage sectors a rescue package worth £1.57bn, which the playwright and funding advocate James Graham described as “surprisingly ambitious”.

A longtime Labour supporter, Tennant appeared in an election broadcast in 2015 before becoming disillusioned with Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership (to summarise various diplomatic responses to interviewers). Asked if he was a fan of Corbyn in 2017, he said he was a fan of the party – although its ambivalent position on Brexit (which Tennant has called a “shitshow”) was a sticking point.

Before last year’s general election, he said he was not even sure if he would vote for Labour. He did – to return Ruth Cadbury to her Brentford and Isleworth seat: “And, also, what was the actual alternative?”

He admits he found Labour’s defeat and the postmortem “disappointingly predictable”, although he still struggles to fathom how so many red seats turned blue. “How do you go from ever being a Labour supporter to supporting Boris Johnson?” he asks, dumbfounded.

He expresses some limited sympathy for politicians handed a pandemic when they thought they “were only going to have to talk about Brexit”. “But if you choose a cabinet purely to surround yourself with people who won’t disagree with you, you’re not necessarily getting the greatest brains in the country,” he says, although a caveat is quick in coming. “One might postulate, were that to be the case, and I’m not for a minute suggesting it is …”

Last year, Tennant singled out Michael Gove’s call for “enough of experts” as a “political lowpoint”. That attitude has had deadly consequences during the pandemic, I suggest. Now the government is “hiding behind them”, he agrees – “selectively, of course. If the experts then say: ‘We told them not to do that,’ suddenly they’re evil again.”

He shakes his head in despair. “Ugh! It’s a very sad state of affairs. Remember when there used to be clever people? When you look back on David Cameron and George W Bush with some kind of sentimentality, you think: ‘Jesus – how low have we plummeted, when they look like better options than what we’ve got currently?’”

Under Keir Starmer, Tennant says Labour “are looking a lot stronger”: “We’ve got a clever grownup in the room, which makes the other side look as ridiculous as they are. Let’s hope he can fulfil his early promise.”

Tennant has said he was inspired to act by watching Doctor Who at the age of three. When he was cast as the 10th incarnation of the Doctor, in 2005, he quipped that the first line of his obituary was written. Ten years since ceding the role to Matt Smith, Tennant remains as connected as ever to the programme, recording a new Doctor Who audio drama while in lockdown. “It’s a nice show to be associated with, because people feel kindly towards it,” he says. “You may not be a fan, but it sort of sits there in the cultural firmament. As a nation, I think we’re quite proud of it.”

Unlike many vehicles for British nostalgia, the malleability of the format has allowed Doctor Who to move with the times, he thinks. “It absolutely comes with all that nostalgic goodwill, but it also manages to live in the moment.

“It felt like a very different show in 2005 than it did in 1963, but it also has that link to the past – which is a positive, rather than preserving it in aspic in any way.” And the Doctor, defined by his (or her) kindness, a peaceful champion of the underdog, is “a wonderful character to aspire to. It’s about being the cleverest person in the room, not the strongest.”

Tennant, meanwhile, remains in his garden, the school pickup plan no more clear for all the messages sent back and forth over the threshold. “Probably would have been quicker just to go and have a conversation,” he says, cheerily. “But less fun for you, obviously.”

[things2mustdo]

Recently there’s been a lot of talk about whether or not the media has our best interests at heart, and with more and more men awakening from the feminist matrix, it seems that the mainstream media is going the way of the dinosaur.

Donald Trump has been urging the public not to trust the mainstream media, but I’m sure that if you’re a reader of Return Of Kings, you don’t need him to tell you that. The modern mainstream media is basically the same thing as the Church was in the 1200’s—they control the flow of information, and they don’t like it when people disagree with them. In fact, if someone who disagrees with them gets popular enough, they often times resort to smear campaigns (see: smearing Roosh as a manipulative pickup artist, and Milo as a pedophile apologist).

Now, I know what you’re thinking—“I know the media doesn’t report on things, Jon, but fake news? That’s, like, intentionally lying and manipulating information, isn’t it?” Yes, sir, it is—and this is what the mainstream media, particularly CNN, has been doing ever since television became popular.

Here’s 5 examples of how CNN is, in fact, “fake news”:

1. Kicking Bernie Sanders Off-Air

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWQcxUIYUcQ

Bernie Sanders, the unofficial leader of the socialist movement in America, recently called CNN “fake news,” before being kicked off the air. CNN tried to play this off as a “connection issue,” but anyone with a grain of common sense knows better.

Bernie: “…who is the head of Russia, and now we’re learning that there may have been discussions between Flynn and the Russians, about sanctions, before this administration took power. So this is very, very troubling, and I think the president is going to have to tell us what he’s gonna do about it.”

CNN Anchor: “So far he hasn’t said much…he was asked about Flynn on his flight to Mar-a-Lago late today…here’s how he responded:

[plays clip of Donald Trump denying obvious lie directed towards him]

CNN Anchor: “He says he hasn’t seen any of these reports. Is that a problem?”

Bernie: “Well, I don’t know, maybe he was watching CNN Fake News, what do you think?”

Bernie: [sees her offended look] “It was a joke.”

CNN Anchor: “You don’t buy what he said, obviously?”

Bernie: “Erin?”

Bernie: “Kevin, I’m not—are we on?”

CNN Anchor: “Umm, it looks like we’ve lost connection with Senator Sanders…”

Right, of course. You just happened to “lose connection,” with Senator Sanders conveniently right after he called you fake news.

2. “Racism” Is Why Adele Won Grammy

After Adele won the song of the year, record of the year, and best solo pop performance awards, it wasn’t long before CNN charged in to proclaim that “racism,” was the cause. CNN “reports”:

…”but with its racial themes and imagery, some are questioning if the project was “just too black” for Grammy voters. Kevin Powell, author of the memoir “The Education of Kevin Powell” and a forthcoming biography on rapper Tupac Shakur, thinks so. He told CNN “Beyonce’s ‘Lemonade’ made a lot of people uncomfortable, because it is so political, so spiritual, so unapologetically black, and so brutally honest about love, self-love, trust, betrayal.”

Right, because apparently Beyonce, despite being nominated for 62 Grammy awards, and winning a whopping 22 Grammy awards, is being discriminated against. In the Leftist’s delusional reality, any time a white person succeeds, it’s due to “racism,” yet any time a black person succeeds, it’s due to “overcoming insurmountable odds.”

Give me a break. Adele won the Grammy, because the panel thought her songs were better, period. This has nothing to do with racism, but apparently CNN still thinks it’s a good idea to race-bait the hell out of current events in 2017. I don’t see this changing anytime soon, either.

3. Venezuela Bans CNN For Lies

According to Fox News World, the president of Venezuela actually asked CNN to leave:

“CNN, do not get into the affairs of Venezuelans. I want CNN well away from here—outside of Venezuela. Do not put your nose in Venezuela.” -Nicolas Maduro

…and can you blame him? CNN has repeatedly shown how ridiculously biased they are, and they’ve shown how willing to lie they are, for the past year after running a gigantic smear campaign against Donald Trump.

Didn’t CNN claim that The Donald had a 3% chance of being elected president? What did they do, just poll the gender studies department at UC Berkeley? I wouldn’t be surprised if they did, because nobody in their right mind would ever accidentally come to the conclusion that our current president had a 3% chance of winning.

In fact, other independent journalists such as Mike Cernovich actually predicted that Donald would win months before the election day in November—how? Because they saw the trends. They saw that men were tired of being emasculated and having their lives ruined, they saw that we’re tired of being shamed for our whiteness, and they saw that the people of America were starting to wake up from their NWO conditioning.

4. “Our Job Is To Control Exactly What People Think.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoXGV4Vw-VA

Yeah, yeah—I know this one isn’t CNN, but they’re all the same to me. MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, and even Fox News to an extent…they’re all just different heads on the same globalist-controlled hydra. Buckle in though, boys, because this one’s pretty bad…and it just happened days ago.

Mika Brzezinski, whose name should automatically create suspicion in the wary citizen, recently stated on MSNBC that it’s “our job,” to “control exactly what people think.” I honestly couldn’t even make this stuff up, but if you don’t believe me, you can watch it in the video above.

Mika Brzezinski: “Well, I think the dangerous edges here are that he’s trying to undermine the media, trying to make up his own facts, and it could be that while unemployment and the economy worsens, he could have undermined the messaging so much that he could control exactly what people think…and that is our job.”

No, Mika, that isn’t your job. Your job is to report the facts and let THE PEOPLE decide what to think, but if you can’t get that through your thick skull I guess we’ll just stop watching your crappy network.

5. Donald Trump Calls CNN “Fake News”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZI0Q3LQZmo

Ah, I saved the best for last—I do love me some Donald burns. After a CNN “news reporter” tried to aggressively ask Donald a question for some odd 20 seconds, repeatedly interrupting him and interjecting his way into the conversation, Donald lost it and called him “fake news.”

And who could blame him? They spent the last 8 months doing absolutely everything within their power to completely ruin Donald Trump’s chances at winning…and yet, by the grace of God, and by the memes of Pepe, lord of Keks, the Trump train smashed its way through the entire god damn establishment…and won.

Trump: [to other reporter] “Go ahead.”

CNN Fake News: “MR. PRESIDENT SINCE YOU’RE ATTACKING US CAN YOU GIVE US A QUESTION!”

Trump: [to CNN] “No.”

Trump: [to other reporter]: “Go ahead.”

CNN Fake News: “MR. PRESIDENT ELECT! MR. PRESIDENT ELECT! SINCE YOU ARE ATTACKING OUR NEWS ORGANIZATION,”

Trump: [to CNN] “No, not you.”

Trump: [to other reporter] “Go ahead.”

CNN Fake News: “CAN YOU GIVE US A QUESTION,”

Trump: [to CNN] “Not you.”

CNN Fake News: “GIVE US A CHANCE! MR PRESIDENT”

Trump: [to CNN] “Your organization’s terrible.”

CNN Fake News: “CAN YOU GIVE US A CHANCE, JUST LET US ASK…”

Trump: [to CNN] “Your organization’s terrible.”

CNN Fake News: “LET US ASK A QUESTION, SIR! SIR!”

Trump: [to CNN] “Quiet.”

This goes on for literally 25 seconds, before Trump finally becomes visibly angry and proclaims:

Trump: [to CNN] “You are fake news.”

If the President of the United States of America thinks that CNN is fake news, I think they’re probably fake news.

Summary

In conclusion, if you still watch the mainstream media, don’t. Get your news from real news sites, like Return Of Kings, Info Wars, Gateway Pundit, Drudge Report, and Cernovich. The MSM has shown us multiple times in the past that they’re globalist whores, selling out the American public to fatten their own pockets.

I recently bought an Info Wars shirt to start wearing around in public, and the results have restored my faith in America. Everywhere I wear it, I’ve gotten complements—it’s not that often, but you’d be surprised how many men are awake, but just don’t broadcast it.

The MSM would have you believe that 99% of the American public hates Trump, but it’s really only something like 10% who hate him, and maybe 25% more who dislike him.

I usually wear Info Wars, Breitbart, and Trump apparel to the gym, because most guys who have a shredded six pack from lifting heavy ass weights are strong and masculine, and are therefore not subject to stupid social pressures that the media uses to influence you.

Do your part in spreading the good gospel of the manosphere, the alt-news, and the resurgence of America, and we’ll reclaim our country for sure. Let’s all make America great again.

https://www.returnofkings.com/165920/how-journalists-became-whores

Journalists are supposed to follow a set of rules and values called deontology. These rules say journalists should strive to be impartial, objective, and to inform their readers. We know well this is not the true nature of their activity.

Most MSM journalists today if not all are spinsters. They cherry-pick their facts and craft narratives around to steer people towards an untold yet ever-present agenda. They make up stereotypes while attacking other stereotypes, they make up ideas while attacking other ideas, as it suits the editorial line of their employer.

In the name of information, journalists create and fulfill an artificially constructed consciousness. They are paid to do so. They believe what they’re doing is normal or cool, just like the Ministry of Truth in Orwell’s 1984, where officers burn archives then forget they just destroyed records (soon to be rewritten); your average leftist journalist spins all the time, follows all the time, yet doesn’t even know he spins and follows.

A little bit of history

If you lend an ear to leftist historians, up to perhaps to age of discoveries, the West didn’t know much. Everybody were locked into their own towns and fields. Well, this is not true. Europeans had known about the Silk Road from time immemorial. Kings and the clergy had their messengers, their events, their gatherings. Individuals like Saint Bernard or Saint Thomas of Aquino were quite familiar with communicating at a distance.

It was just much slower than today—and quite of a luxury as well. Common folk had to rely on minstrels, travelers, and on their own travels. Most communication was done orally. Academics today love to point out how unreliable the bush telegraph is, but at least this communication is done naturally between common people rather than top-down from a shadowy agenda.

Also, as slow as this word-to-mouth communication was, people then did not need more: they could make a living on their own, with the insurance that they could consume it themselves or sell it. Markets tended to be stable, and whether you were a field-tiller or a craftsman, you didn’t need to know about the latest fad not to be left behind. People were also much less bored and in need of diversions. Didn’t have newspapers, didn’t need them.

Then came the printing press. What had been done by scribes secluded in monasteries became partly automatized and multiplied. Bibles were printed. Then pamphlets. By the time, Protestantism had well developed, clever princes tried to use it to their advantage, and the Catholic church counter-attacked by launching one of the most manipulative orders ever created.

More power to independent people meant chaos. Printing outside of the rigid hierarchy of the Church meant a never-ending contest of ideas, systems, tastes, experiences, and egos. The hypocritical journalists of now who chide “trolls” while sniffing their own written farts should remember that trolling appeared as a side-effect of the printing press, as it became possible to say anything remotely instead of being necessarily confrontable. Plus, trolling helps to think of things to talk about with a girl.

Nevertheless, printing what you wanted was not that simple. First, literacy was still the hallmark of a comfortable upbringing, and second, you had to be able to print. You had to know a printer, had to make a deal with him and pay him. Not to mention the dissemination of your lovely printed book. It was always possible to print in a country with virtually no censorship, then smuggle books, but who was to receive them and share them?

No matter what you had to say, you always needed to address a noble-bourgeois audience, which meant catering to fashionable topics or debates. Otherwise, your material would be simply ignored. Authors who weren’t too well-known had to rely on booksellers who conspired to arrange a discrete monopoly on over-the-counter books. Yep, the world of “culture” has always been murky, and its members believe this is a sign of their superior intelligence.

As “culture” developed, with its train of noise, untold rivalries and social parasitism, periodic journals were printed at an ever-faster pace. Eighteenth century bi-annuals were replaced by daily or weekly newspapers. Which meant a great need, not for amateur gentlemen, but for people who could write constantly. Such people would be called journalists.

The modern journalist plant

If you believe journalism is about informing the public, forget it immediately. There is no such thing as an automatic progress which just makes happen what seems desirable. If an unbiased, all-objective information seems desirable, that does not mean someone will pay for it or even manage to get it. Even the CIA Factbook was made in the first place because objective information would benefit the CIA itself, not “enlighten the masses” or whatever a leftist salesman would say.

A journalist is basically someone who is paid to write on particular issues, in a well-defined format, as his boss sees fit. A journal belongs to someone—no matter if the owner is public or private—who usually has its own aims. Whether the newspaper has to simply sell or shape the opinion, it always aims at something else than merely informing.

(Even ROK has an agenda, and I’m fine with it, because I believe it is sound and fair, but I’d never pretend I write for the sole love of truth or as if I was a disembodied soul with no consciousness of its own. Any writer having such pretenses is a hypocrite or a liar.)

Back to the nineteenth century. Newspapers were just like factories. As plant workers had to churn tangible products, journalists had to churn out impressions. They were like paid artists for the ephemeral, creating appearances that would sell, or satisfy, or infuriate—anything as long as it suited the editorial line of their employer. Journalists did not become whores. They were paid employees, to put it politely, from day one. But at least the blue collar workers had to pretense to say the truth or illuminate or whatever BS that sells.

Let’s say you were born with a high verbal IQ, a knack for writing, and some ideas. What could you do? You may consider writing books, become an intellectual, but book writing takes time and often doesn’t pay. If you can’t live like an annuitant, you must be an employee.

If you choose the written words, you have to conform to a preexisting editorial line, to a particular milieu that already existed before you did, in hope of being granted a job. Creating a journal demanded not only experience but capital as well. Can you pay a printer? Would a banker trust you if you asked him for a loan so you can start a journal?

As the nineteenth century was an epoch of exceptional growth, some people had this capital or trust, and many independent journals were formed. Many, though, were bought off, or chased away, or censored. The elite does not want you to become an influencer, unless, of course, you remain a perpetual servant of their agenda.

This is why mild conservatives are accepted as a stooge opposition, along with the alt lite, whereas those who really want to save civilization and its creators are reviled. The elites want to destroy civilization, so, their journalists, who all depend on them socially and financially, foster their agenda while lying to themselves on the nature of what they do.

So-called investigators are paid by Darth Soros to “investigate” on convenient targets while turning a blind eye on other things, like mass immigration, or upholding a mandatory narrative which rests not on truth but on pure social conformism—muh minorities r always good, muh white males r always wrong.

Perhaps the “fake news” offensive has been crafted, not only to maintain the masses into the blue pill matrix, but also to reassure the frail employees that they are serving truth and progress. Which is already dubious, as worshiping an arbitrary strand of “progress” has nothing to do with objectivity, just as the contemporary humanities are rather a Hollywood for nerds than a place of real knowledge, but you can’t ask vapid girls to get to this level.

No one writes for the sake of truth alone. Independent writers or journalists also speak of what they think relevant. They will mention XYZ facts because these are important, or, at least, ensure a modicum of success. Just like men tend to read Miyamoto Musashi quotes, not merely because he existed, but because he’s interesting.

Mainstream journalists are courtiers. They are paid by global elites to do their bidding. They work in cities just like filmmakers work in grand obscure studios—because their activity lies in creating perceptions, in shaping fashions, ideas, mottos, norms. The difference between a marketer, a journalist and a filmmaker is only of scale and means. The aim, and the bottom, is the same.

We are different, because we are bottom-up. When mainstream journalists sold their souls, we are upholding ours. The problem with this is that we’re ill-paid. The globalists and the boomers tend to concentrate all the money, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to witness that the non-mainstream outlets tend to all lack money. Such is the price of independence.

We ought to have our own money elsewhere, and have a lot of independent journalists around, so that autonomous individuals from our side can work or investigate and help masculine men to shape their own consciousness.