#Food Security
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
probablyasocialecologist · 3 days ago
Text
Food prices have risen by more than 30% since the end of 2021. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has estimated that 7.2 million people were living in households with low or very low food security in 2022–23. That number accounts for 11% of the UK population and 17% of children. It represents an increase of 80% in the space of just three years. The use of food banks has also increased exponentially. In 2023–24 the Trussell Trust distributed 3.1 million emergency food parcels, the highest number ever recorded. That represents a 94% increase in the last five years and a massive 240% increase from just a decade ago.
The False Economy of Big Food
62 notes · View notes
ireton · 5 months ago
Text
The 4 Big Meat Packers In America Are Making A Move To Bankrupt Small Farms In America Starting In August
“This is a way that they're gonna be trying to force us out”
“The big 4 packers are killing the American cattle industry right now. Projected by August, each cattle rancher that is selling their animal is gonna be making $30 less per 100 pounds on that market ready animal.
- The American cattle rancher makes about 30% of every dollar earned on that animal - With this gonna be set in place, this is gonna take us down into the twenties.
This is gonna be a real scary place for the American cattle rancher. ‌ ‌If they can't make a profit or make a living off of what they're selling, their ranches are gonna be put up for sale.
This is a way that they're gonna be trying to force us out.
- And not only that, the corrupt thing is they're gonna be marking everything up $30 to every 100 pounds that they're making in return.
So with that being said, guys, we need to get back to buying local, supporting our local people. And as always, buy American and buy local.”
814 notes · View notes
dontforgetukraine · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
October 16th marks World Food Day.
It is not the first time Russia has weaponized food as a means of control and aggression (ex: Holodomor). In Ukraine's fight against Russia's war, it has become an unprecedented guarantee of food security for the world through the "Grain from Ukraine" program. This grain is distributed by the UN's World Food Program to recipient countries suffering food shortages. This is all while Russia shells grain terminals, blockades Ukrainian ships, and wages its aggression towards farmers in its war. Remember, much of the agricultural land is contaminated with mines and other unexploded ordnance.
In order to maintain food security, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine has listed what it will take.
Full and safe navigation in the Black and Azov seas.
Restoration of Ukraine's sovereign control over its ports.
Establishment of new ports
Expansion of the assortment of Ukrainian goods transported by seas.
Security guarantees are not just important for Ukraine, but for the entire world. Already Ukraine has delivered 228,960 tons of agricultural products to:
Somalia
Ethiopia
Kenya
Yemen
Mauritania
Nigeria
Sudan
Djibouti
Mozambique
the Democratic Republic of Congo
Palestine
Supporting Ukraine means supporting the world. History has already seen Russia weaponize food. Russia's war shows it is doing so again right now. If we fail to support Ukraine, don't be surprised if Russia chooses to manipulate countries that need Ukrainian grain.
114 notes · View notes
greenhorizonblog · 5 months ago
Text
FOOD, WATER, HOUSING, HEALTHCARE AND EDUCATION ARE BASIC FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS THAT SHOULD ALWAYS BE FREE!!!
179 notes · View notes
vox-anglosphere · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
As with doctors, British farmers make their daily rounds too.
275 notes · View notes
allthecanadianpolitics · 1 year ago
Text
The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) will be issuing the long-promised "grocery rebate" payments to eligible Canadians on July 5.
Months after Parliament passed the one-time benefit first unveiled as part of the 2023 federal budget, the payments will be hitting Canadians' bank accounts on Wednesday.
The food-inflation focused affordability measure is set to roll out to approximately 11 million low- and modest-income Canadians.
Essentially a re-branded GST rebate boost, the payment will be issued through Canada's GST/HST tax credit system, alongside the regular quarterly GST/HST payments. [...]
Continue Reading.
Tagging: @politicsofcanada
714 notes · View notes
cognitivejustice · 4 months ago
Text
Underground greenhouses are helping people to take back control of their nutrition and ease farming amid the climate crisis
74 notes · View notes
idkinsertfanreferencehere · 18 days ago
Text
1$ seed bundle for ppl struggling financially
1$ for five packets of seeds that can be sown right now.
Currently Contains: "Astro" Arugula "Russian Frills" Kale "Winter giant" Spinach "French Breakfast" Radish "Lutz" Beets
1$ price tag includes shipping and handling, limit 1 order per household
20 notes · View notes
acti-veg · 8 months ago
Text
The FAO roadmap was published at the Cop28 climate summit in December and accepts that diets “absolutely must [change] for human and planetary health”. But its 120 actions do not include reducing meat and dairy consumption in nations where most people already eat unhealthy amounts. Instead, many of the FAO’s recommendations are to intensify the efficiency of animal farming techniques.
“It’s very striking: the FAO doesn’t include one of the clearest interventions that would help meet both environmental and health targets,” said Cleo Verkuijl, of the Stockholm Environment Institute US and one of the eight authors of the commentary from academic institutions in the US, the Netherlands and Brazil.
“Also really surprising is the fact that the FAO completely dismisses alternative proteins,” she said. These had been shown to have far smaller environmental impacts than conventional meat but the FAO claimed, without providing evidence, that plant-based meats had “nutritional deficiencies”, the experts said.
A report from the UN Environment Programme (Unep), published in December, said “alternatives to animal products such as meat and dairy may contribute to significantly reducing the environmental footprint of the current global food system”.
59 notes · View notes
probablyasocialecologist · 7 months ago
Text
In international development circles, most people are familiar with the World Bank’s data showing that extreme poverty has declined dramatically over the past several decades, from 43 per cent of the world’s population in 1981 to less than 10 per cent today. This narrative is based on the World Bank’s method of calculating the share of people who live on less than $1.90 per day (in 2011 “PPP” terms). But a growing body of literature argues that the World Bank’s PPP-based method suffers from a major empirical limitation, in that it does not account for the cost of meeting basic needs in any given context (see here, here and here). Having more than $1.90 PPP does not guarantee that a person can afford the specific goods and services that are necessary for survival. In recent years, scholars have developed a more accurate method for measuring extreme poverty, by comparing people’s incomes to the prices of essential goods in each country (specifically food, shelter, clothing and fuel). This approach is known as the “basic needs poverty line” (BNPL), and it more closely approximates what the original concept of “extreme poverty” was intended to measure. 
[...]
Extreme poverty is not a natural condition, but a sign of severe dislocation. Historical data on real wages since the 15th century indicates that under normal conditions, across different societies and eras, people are generally able to meet their subsistence needs except during periods of severe social displacement, such as famines, wars, and institutionalised dispossession, particularly under European colonialism. What is more, BNPL data shows that many countries have managed to keep extreme poverty very close to zero, even with low levels of GDP per capita, by using strategies such as public provisioning and price controls for basic essentials. In other words, extreme poverty can be prevented much more easily than most people assume. Indeed, it need not exist at all. The fact that it persists at such high levels today indicates that severe dislocation is institutionalised in the world economy – and that markets have failed to meet the basic needs of much of humanity. To address this problem, and to end extreme poverty – the first objective of the Sustainable Development Goals – will require public planning to prioritise the production of, and guarantee access to, the specific goods and services that people need to live decent lives.
284 notes · View notes
igottatho · 9 months ago
Text
I like to see videos like this, not just because it’s happier than the massacres and blood shed, but to remind everyone that these are just normal people, normal children and normal everyday helpers. And even in the darkest of times, happiness can found in sharing with each other, and helping one another.
PS. I don’t understand any Arabic, really, but the heart knows, right?
I found this via instagram, on Nour Talal Alnajjar’s page, which you can find here.
93 notes · View notes
ireton · 11 months ago
Text
THE GERMAN FARMERS WON
After Bringing Berlin to a complete halt, the Government have backed down on several ludicrous taxation & net zero policy impacting food production. Of course you won’t see this on fake news MSM as they don’t wish you to know the wider narrative and/or implications of. This however is just the battle & not the war.
747 notes · View notes
dontforgetukraine · 1 month ago
Text
"Russia continues to use food as an element of aggression. This year, the enemy has smuggled more than 180,000 tonnes of stolen Ukrainian grain through the port of Mariupol alone."
—Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal
Source: Russians steal 180,000 tonnes of Ukrainian grain through Mariupol port
80 notes · View notes
rebeccathenaturalist · 1 year ago
Text
Foraging has become a REALLY hot topic over the past few years. We even saw a surge of interest at the start of the pandemic fueled both by the shutdown, and by concerns about food security due to grocery shortages. My foraging classes are consistently the most popular ones I offer, and the Facebook groups I'm on are absolutely teeming with new people interested in getting started.
But as with any extractive activity, foraging has its downsides. The more people out in the woods and fields looking for edible mushrooms (and plants), the more strain that puts on local ecosystems. In my classes I advocate for only taking 25% of a given species in an area (unless you find, like, three chanterelles, in which case just pick the three chanterelles.) A lot of people have less restraint, and of course you have commercial mushroom hunters who will clean out every single marketable mushroom they find, leaving nothing for anyone else.
This is a topic that I don't feel gets enough attention in the foraging world, but we desperately need to be talking about it more. Most of us who forage do not rely on it as a primary form of food security, and have other reasonable options for acquiring food. Yes, it can be fun to go out looking for mushrooms and berries and such when we're out hiking and camping, and I am a big fan of what I call "incidental foraging"--picking things you find while you're doing something else. It's good to know how to identify edible and it's a nice treat when I run across something. But unless my situation changes to where my food security is seriously threatened, I do not personally feel the need to be one of those foragers where 90% of what they eat is something they foraged, especially when I am financially secure enough to be able to go to the grocery store whenever I want. I think most foragers these days are in a similar situation, though there are always going to be people for whom foraging is a necessary and vital part of food security.
So yes, I am strongly in favor of bag limits for non-indigenous people, hardship permits for those in financial need (and don't make the application process too much of a hurdle), and curbs on widespread commercial mushroom harvest. It's not just to save something for other people, but to reduce wear and tear on the land. Those mushrooms need to be spreading spores for the next generation, and I worry that overharvesting is going to have deleterious effects both on the mushroom species being harvested, and the health of the ecosystems they are a part of.
146 notes · View notes
nuroful · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
via kandaka magazine on Instagram
72 notes · View notes
allthecanadianpolitics · 9 months ago
Text
Toronto is about to be home to a pay-what-you-can restaurant that allows everyone barrier-free access to food. Created by Chef Jagger Sean Gordon, Feed it Forward is an organization that's working towards ensuring affordable access to quality foods across the city through a number of different initiatives, and they're about to add one more. Residents in the St. Clair West area of the city recently noticed something exciting going into a vacant space — a new location of Soup Bar by Feed it Forward, one of the organization's many PWYC restaurant concepts. Soup Bar has existed in the city in various forms over the years, including a pop-up at Market 707 back in 2017, and the latest iteration will be officially opening for business on March 1 for at least six months serving hot and frozen soups, stews and chillis.
Continue Reading
Tagging @politicsofcanada
117 notes · View notes