#Far right extremism

[phantom-of-the-memes]

The far right have started serious riots in Dublin in response to a stabbing by an immigrant.

I don’t even need to go into how him being an immigrant is fucking irrelevant, and making this about your fascist opinions is taking away the attention from the actual victims. You guys are smarter than to fall for that.

Gangs of white Irish men are destroying the city; setting cars, buses, and shops on fire. They’re posting videos of them laughing as they smash out the windows of buses and shops and loot the place.

This is the right wing’s politics. “Immigrants are destroying Dublin”… says the people actively smashing the place to bits.

Please stay inside if you live in the centre. Especially for immigrants/ people of colour/ trans people / queer people/ any group that white supremacists target.

[bouncinghedgehog]

[queer-geordie-dyke]

The absolute irony of the far right EDL arseholes currently rioting their way through the country constantly bleating "them immigrants don't respect our country or our laws" while they're the ones destroying their own towns, setting police cars and buildings on fire, and putting officers in the hospital. Practice what you preach maybe, you absolute bell ends.

[thatheathen]

Erin in the Morning | Fact Check: Viral Picture Of "Trans Trump Shooter" Turns Out To Be Someone Else

[shamebats]

[jensorensen]

Weirdo Welfare

As this excellent essay by a fellow Ohioan notes, Vance has expressed disdain for the laziness and lack of bootstrapping by the poor people he grew up around, and doesn't support policies now that would actually help them.

Receive my weekly newsletter and keep this work sustainable by joining the Sorensen Subscription Service! Also on Patreon.

[davidaugust]

Pete Hegseth has been nominated to become US Secretary of Defense, a position he is unqualified for and will be destructive in.

“Hegseth explicitly rejects democracy in American Crusade, characterizing it as a leftist demand: ‘For leftists, calls for ‘democracy’ represent a complete rejection of our system. Watch how often they use the word,’ adding: ‘They hate America, so they hate the Constitution and want to quickly amass 51 percent of the votes to change it.’”

“He explicitly supports forms of election-rigging through gerrymandering. Fair electoral boundaries, he writes, amount to ‘Playing nice to placate the so-called middle,’ which ‘has been a losing strategy for patriots for decades’. Since ‘the other side is stacked with enemies of freedom’, Hegseth argues, ‘Republican legislatures should draw congressional lines that advantage pro-freedom candidates – and screw Democrats.’”

“Hegseth’s rhetoric about perceived ‘internal’ or ‘domestic enemies’, along with media reports highlighting his tattoo of the crusader motto ‘Deus Vult’, may ring alarm bells for those concerned by Donald Trump’s repeated threats to unleash the US military, which Hegseth would directly control, on those he has described as ‘the enemy within’.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/22/trump-defense-secretary-pete-hegseth-book

[allthecanadianpolitics]

Members of the controversial “Save the Children Convoy”  say they were invited into the House of Commons as “VIP��� guests of one of Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative MPs before being suddenly kicked out following questions from PressProgress.

The so-called “Save the Children Convoy” revolves around a range of conspiratorial narratives, including allegations that the United Nations is promoting pedophilia in Canadian schools. The group has had numerous run-ins with Ottawa Police in recent weeks and its leader has advocated jailing politicians and police.

Postings on social media Wednesday afternoon show a dozen individuals affiliated with the conspiratorial convoy group wandering the halls of Parliament while posing for photos and broadcasting livestream videos.

“We are in Parliament today in the VIP,” Save the Children Convoy member Brenda Belanger wrote on Facebook Wednesday afternoon. [...]

Continue Reading.

Note from the poster @el-shab-hussein: It continues to fascinate me how these far right goons can be so convinced of their own oppression and subjugation at the hands of the government while being openly welcomed by them.

Tagging: @politicsofcanada, @vague-humanoid

[nando161mando]

[ngdrb]

Evaluating the Concerns and Potential Extremism of Project 2025

This far-right, extremist agenda is a threat to a multiracial, diverse democracy

Introduction

Project 2025 has garnered significant attention and sparked debate among various stakeholders. This analysis aims to explore the reasons why some individuals and groups express apprehension about the project and to evaluate whether these concerns are deemed extreme. Additionally, this discourse will consider potential modifications to address these concerns  and Perceptions of Extremism

Scope and Ambition

 Project 2025 has been widely viewed as ambitiously forward-thinking. While some express concerns about its comprehensive scope possibly causing unforeseen disruptions to current systems, critics suggest these challenges are natural in pioneering endeavors. The project's magnitude naturally provokes apprehensions regarding its feasibility and long-term sustainability. However, such bold initiatives are essential to drive innovation and address pressing global challenges. By carefully navigating potential pitfalls and leveraging comprehensive planning, Project 2025 can emerge as a transformative force for progress, laying a robust foundation for a sustainable future.

Political and Social Implications

The project's political and social ramifications are pivotal concerns. Detractors argue it could bring about sweeping alterations to societal norms and governance, potentially marginalizing specific demographics. These transformative shifts are frequently perceived as revolutionary, thereby evoking apprehensions about its radical nature. Such apprehensions underscore the need for a careful examination of its potential impact on inclusivity and social cohesion. It is imperative to navigate these concerns with a balanced approach that ensures equitable outcomes and fosters constructive dialogue about the project's goals and implications for a harmonious society.

Economic Impact

Concerns abound regarding the economic repercussions of Project 2025. Critics contend that the necessary financial resources might overburden public finances, potentially necessitating higher taxes or diverting funds from essential sectors. Such economic uncertainties are seen as fueling perceptions of radicalism. It is crucial to address these apprehensions through careful planning and transparent communication about the project's long-term benefits. By emphasizing strategic economic growth and prudent resource management, we can mitigate fears and build consensus on the project's potential to foster sustainable development and economic stability. This approach ensures that Project 2025 is viewed not as a risk, but as a catalyst for positive change.

Technological and Ethical Concerns

The integration of advanced technologies in Project 2025 raises significant ethical and privacy concerns, making it a contentious initiative. The potential for surveillance, data misuse, and erosion of individual freedoms stokes widespread fears. As we embrace these technologies, we must address the ethical implications to safeguard privacy and uphold fundamental rights. Ensuring transparent and responsible use of data can alleviate concerns and foster trust. By prioritizing ethical considerations, Project 2025 can become a beacon of innovation that respects privacy and individual freedoms, turning a potential threat into an opportunity for responsible technological advancement.

Potential for Adaptation

To mitigate the perceived extremism of Project 2025 and address the apprehensions, the following adaptations could be considered:

Incremental Implementation

Adopting a phased approach to project implementation offers the opportunity for continuous assessment and refinement at each stage. This strategy not only facilitates better risk management but also mitigates concerns about abrupt changes. By breaking down the project into manageable phases, we can identify and address issues promptly, ensuring smoother transitions and more effective solutions. This method fosters a more controlled and adaptable environment, increasing the likelihood of success while minimizing disruption. Embracing this incremental approach will ultimately lead to more sustainable and positive outcomes for the entire team.

Transparent Communication

Improving transparency regarding the project’s objectives, procedures, and potential outcomes is crucial for fostering public trust. Engaging openly with stakeholders and employing effective communication strategies are essential steps in combating misinformation and alleviating concerns. By clearly articulating our goals and methods, we can establish credibility and reassure the community about the project’s positive impacts. Emphasizing these aspects not only enhances understanding but also cultivates a supportive environment where informed decisions can be made collaboratively. This approach ensures that all parties are well-informed and aligned, promoting a constructive dialogue that strengthens confidence and minimizes uncertainties.

Ethical Guidelines and Oversight

Implementing stringent ethical guidelines and independent oversight mechanisms effectively addresses worries regarding privacy and data security. Prioritizing ethical considerations not only safeguards sensitive information but also cultivates trust and support from the public. By adhering to these principles, we demonstrate our commitment to transparency and accountability, fostering a climate where individuals feel secure and valued. This approach not only mitigates risks but also enhances our credibility, ensuring that our practices align with the highest standards of integrity and responsibility. Ultimately, integrating robust ethical frameworks is pivotal in garnering widespread endorsement and maintaining ethical leadership in data management.

Economic Safeguards

Implementing economic safeguards is crucial to shield vulnerable groups and promote fair resource allocation, alleviating concerns about financial burdens. Transparent budgeting and stringent financial accountability are indispensable in fostering trust and ensuring equitable distribution of resources. By instituting these measures, we not only protect the most vulnerable but also uphold principles of fairness and responsibility. This proactive approach not only mitigates fears of economic strain but also lays the foundation for a sustainable and inclusive economic framework that benefits all segments of society.

Conclusion

Project 2025’s ambitious nature and potential for significant societal impact inevitably lead to concerns about its extremism. By understanding these apprehensions and considering adaptive strategies, it is possible to address the fears and work towards a more balanced and acceptable implementation. Engaging with stakeholders, ensuring transparency, and prioritizing ethical considerations are critical steps in this

[bitstitchbitch]

about to turn 25 and my life has been

1 year old - 9/11

8 years old - housing crash and recession

16 years old - first Trump presidency

20 years old - Covid19 pandemic

22 years old - fibromyalgia onset

24 years old - second Trump presidency

25 years old - ??? hopefully good things

Gen Z really got screwed over

[cazort]

Leftist, antiracist activists like to criticize the police, but something even scarier than police brutality and corruption has been happening in the community near me.

There is a significant portion of the population in suburban Delaware that harbors both deeply racist views, and anti-police sentiment. These people tend to have far-right views and a deeply punitive mindset; Delaware is a "blue state" and has been relatively progressive about its police policies, moving away from overly punitive policing in recent years.

And some people are irate about it. There are social media posts complaining about out of control crime.

This is woefully out-of-touch with what is actually going on. Delaware had a record low rate of violent crime in 2023, following a brief, temporary surge during the pandemic. Delaware has reduced their prison population too. Statewide total crime has also decreased from 2018 through 2022 as reported by the state, with the largest decrease in drug offenses and a relatively smaller decrease in property crime.

People though have started posting stuff on social media with blurry pictures of people from doorbell cameras, dash cams, and other low-quality cameras. Most of the people in the photos are children or young teenagers. Some of them are employees at work just ringing people's doorbells for presumably valid reasons, such as utility workers, county tax assessers, or delivery people. Occasionally people post photos catching people in the act of a crime, like breaking into a car or damaging property.

A lot of the photos are so blurry it would be hard to definitively ID someone from them, and thus easy to mistake someone's identity. And they're sharing these things on social media and calling for a sort of vigilante justice. And predictably, most of the people being targeted are dark-skinned, which is significant because Delaware is overwhelmingly (65%+) non-hispanic white. It's obvious that these posts are tainted by racism.

When a crime is involved, a lot of people suggest to go to the police, but any time the police are brought up, people start trash talking the police. "The police don't do anything". "Cops are useless." and stuff like that. People are really angry and irate and viciously attack anyone who advocates going to the police.

There is this idea that the police do nothing and the only way to deal with crime is to "take things into your own hands". I don't even know what these people want, because they won't come out and say it, but it's really scary. People are talking about circulating people's pictures, calling them "criminals" and that they need to be "punished". Many of these people, from their other posts, are open about owning guns.

When people talk about defunding the police or abolishing the police, I think it's important to ask the question of what will take their place. As corrupt an institution as the police in the US are, I think it's important to remind ourselves that there can be things worse than the police, and that sometimes, in a power vacuum, whatever institution self-organizes may be worse than the one that existed before.

One of my ancestors was killed by lynching in the south, because he was seen as sympathizing with the Union in the civil war. I also have directly experienced harassment in public for being gender-non-conforming, and also a slew of antisemitic hate comments online targeting me because of my Jewish name, and also sometimes because of my political stances.

I know where this leads and it's not good. People like me (and probably you, reading this) are vulnerable. I belong to multiple groups that would be targeted if vigilante violence became a thing.

I'm white, a US citizen, and relatively well-off. I can't even imagine how much more vulnerable black and other dark-skinned people, immigrants, and poor people would be than myself. But I know they are going to be even more vulnerable.

Take from this what you will. I can tell you what my take is:

We as a society have a deep need to root out both racism and the punitive mindset, and achieving these goals is much more than just moving away from formal policing.

Removing the institution of the police while retaining the racism and the punitive mindset risks devolving into a hellscape of vigilante justice shaped by racism and other biases

In the interim, a functional, even if flawed, police system, with some semblance of respecting due process, is a better status quo than a completely broken or absent police in which vigilante justice (with no due process) takes hold

This is why I am hesitant of rhetoric that universally demonizes the police or calls for immediate or full police abolition. A lot of people see police abolition as a leftist take, but as my recent experience shows, this movement may find an unlikely and unhealthy ally in far-right sentiments, and there is a huge danger in allowing these sentiments to take hold.

When elements of abolition (such as decarceration and decriminalization) take hold, it often strengthens far-right anti-police sentiment, because people start seeing the police as allied to the left, which is ironic because the left often still sees the police as allied to the right.

I haven't seen anyone in police abolition circles talking at all about these occurrences, let alone propose any solutions.

If we want to achieve police abolition, we need a path forward that keeps these unsavory elements under control. And I'm struggling to see that path, which is one thing that makes me think we may need to put the brakes on some of the boldest pushes of the abolition movement.

[queer-geordie-dyke]

In response to the truly appalling murder of three little girls and the attempted murder of several other children in Southport by a 17 year old last week, it didn't take long at all for racist arseholes on social media to spread total bollocks about the attacker being an immigrant and Muslim (he was born in Wales and is from a deeply religious Christian family and was a choir boy as it turns out).

Naturally, this whipped the brain dead who believe that some sort of secret Muslim takeover of the country is occurring into a violent frenzy, and there have been riots and "protests" outside mosques up and down the country, led by the charming individuals of the EDL, one just half an hour away from where I live.

To be clear, these people don't actually give a flying fuck about these children or their families or their traumatised community. Like all extremists, they use real human suffering as an excuse to behave in the most abhorrently violent manner against innocent people.

The EDL, for my non UK friends, is an extremist Islamophobic, white supremacist organisation and there has been talks at the highest level of government to officially proscribe it as a terrorist group:

There is light in the dark though. After the riot in Southport, the local community came together to repair damage to the local mosque.

Violent extremists will never represent or care about the communities they purport to. As it always is, it is ordinary people coming together in solidarity and with love that represent the best of what we can be and the festering pustules of the EDL give a shit about nothing and no one but their hatred.

Editing to include a link to a fundraiser for the families of the children and the community in Southport:

[thatheathen]

Erin In the Morning | Project 2025 Doc.

[radicalreports]

Morning Briefing: Proud Boys Planning Disruptive Protest During Pride Month

The Proud Boys, the far right violent extremist street gang, are planning disruptive protests during the 'target rich environment' of Pride month celebrations.

Morning Briefing: The Proud Boys, the far right violent extremist street gang, “are now more active than ever, and are busy planning disruptive protests at Pride month celebrations across the country in June.”

The Ohio chapter of the group has reported called the upcoming month of LGBTIQ events a “target rich environment.”

The Countering Extremism Working Group was formed to combat extremism within the ranks of the U.S. military, however, two years since the establishment of the working group “the effort has vanished virtually without a trace.”

Shane Lamond, a Lieutenant and the head of an intelligence unit within the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, D.C., “faces criminal charges after allegedly warning the leader of the far-right Proud Boys group about an arrest warrant and leaking other law enforcement information.”

The New Hampshire attorney general’s office met with Task Force Butler, an organization of military veterans that recent published a report on the activities of a neo-Nazi group throughout New England, and “state officials encouraged the veterans group and others to report hate crimes to their office.”

Read more here.

[enemymine2000]

( via TikTok user dasistmirzufilia)

Zu denken, dass viele Menschen immer noch nicht begreifen, dass es politisch für uns ganz persönlich 5 vor 12 ist.

Darum ganz deutlich: Die AFD ist ist rechtsextrem, faschistisch und verfassungsfeindlich. Ihre Mitglieder sind Nazis. Und wer sie unterstützt auch. Egal, ob Anhänger, Mitläufer oder Mitglieder anderer Parteien.

Ich habe mich schon immer klar antifaschistisch positioniert und es muss endlich mal jedem klar weren, dass das für jeden nötig.

Heck, das ist ja nicht mal links, falls es das ist, was noch jemanden abschreckt. Es ist schlicht demokratisch!

For those English speaking followers:

Germany is in political trouble like basically the entirety of the western world with the raise of far right extremism. The German party of AFD are mentally the heirs to the NSDAP and have long since started to say the quiet parts out loud.

This video is a series of quotes from some of their members to showcase how far they have gone.

Examples:

"International Women's Day?! Good idea. One could, to clebrate the day, visit a brothel again." AFD politician Achim Nieder

"Every woman can do what she want. On average however she has to have two children. Which is easier without a full-time job" AFD politician Andreas Wild

"We will hunt them. And will get our land and our peoples back." AFD politician Alexander Gauland (one of their top candidates)

"The refugee doesn't care on which border he dies." AFD politician Günther Lenhardt