#False Allegations

[saturnsconstellation]

snap is not that bad.

THERE. I SAID IT.

Like c’mon let’s be honest 😭 if we want to talk canon, SNAPE was a victim of the marauders (specifically James’s) bullying. Ofc yes he was terrible to Harry and yes, he was mean during his years in school. But being honest with all of you (as a victim of bullying) it changes you as a person, Snape did nothing to deserve that kind of treatment.

IF WE’RE TALKING FANON

Snape is literally just used as the ‘bad guy’ because the fandom already converted the slytherins (More Regulus and Barty who are canonically known to be PROUD DEATH EATERS) and now they need a character to “bully” and make the marauders (and I’m talking about Sirius and James) look cool.

Please grow up and realize that if you can and want to make Regulus, Barty, Evan, NARCISSA AND BELLATRIX good people, you should also consider doing the same for snape. That man did NOTHING to be as hated as he is 😭😭

[youngtreetheorist]

People don't under stand the charges.

Drake Bell was charged with child endangerment and a misdemeanor count of disseminating matter harmful to juveniles, not because he sent explicit pictures, but due to the nature of the communication with a minor. Here's a breakdown:

Child Endangerment: Ohio law holds adults accountable for engaging with minors in ways that could harm or exploit them, even if the adult is unaware of the minor’s age at first. In Drake’s case, although he didn’t send explicit images, the law considered his communication with a minor as reckless, especially after learning her age.

Disseminating Harmful Matter: This charge typically relates to sharing content inappropriate for minors. In this case, the messages exchanged, though not explicit in terms of images, were deemed harmful or inappropriate for someone of her age by the court. The charge doesn't always require the sharing of explicit pictures—messages themselves can be considered harmful.

Essentially, he was charged for inappropriate communication with a minor and for not being more cautious once her age became known, which is why the law still held him accountable.

Drake Bell pled guilty to child endangerment, but he was found not guilty of the other charges. In Ohio, even unknowingly texting a minor is illegal, which is why he was charged with child endangerment. For those without the resources to fully fight their case, sometimes accepting a plea deal is the best option to avoid harsher penalties. Drake unknowingly texted a minor and immediately blocked her after discovering her real age. He was cleared of all other accusations.

[gummygoatgalaxy]

WARNING: THIS PERSON IS CRUEL AND LIKES TO FALSELY ACCUSE OTHERS IN A GUISE OF "BEING HEROIC"

Everyone, @ari-doodles-stuff

Is a person who threatened me and my friends and followers as well as random supporters over false allegations of me being a "pedophile" for drawing a butt "too detailed"

Please be careful!

Here is proof they harassed me and others

Stay safe

[bugsofarc]

Hello, I assume some of yall have read red’s new post explaining her side of the story, in that my name was dropped as part of a “harassment clique”. Now I am not good with words but I would like to share my side of that story, now there is a lot that red said over this clique but I can assure you there is even more that she did not cover. Now red was correct that the side server started off as a gaming server for those who met through the fandom, now this side server did not start off with any malicious intents and it also did not end with it. The server is now completely dry and everyone has left although that does not mean we ended our friendships. The “clique” she spoke of were merely just the most active of the server members that spoke and hung out together more frequently. Red also mentioned that the server became a place where everyone could just be toxic and shit talk fellow readers when this was not the case, the server stayed following its main purpose to chat and play games, the only time anything about other readers or “shit” was discussed was when it came into our friends lives.Now red talked about banning said members of the clique due to “evidence” she had been shown of our “toxicity” when in reality she had maybe one or two screenshots that were taken out of context and given to her by spies she planted in the server for the sole purpose on finding proof of us being “toxic”. The screenshots of “proof” incriminated maybe 1 or 2 people and banned the rest of the “clique” by association. I heard that moments before everyone was banned a fight emerged in a common room channel of the nevercord, I cannot tell you the details of said fight as I was asleep at the moment of all this unraveling, and woke up to already being banned as I was getting ready for school. Now usually when someone is banned in the nevercord they are given a warning telling them that they are about to be and why, now I did not receive anything like this and as far as I am aware neither did the other members of the “clique”. I will admit I foolishly did message red and other mods on an alt that i already had (It was made for joke purposes long before any of the alt harassment allegations were made and I only used it once.) asking frantically as to why I was banned, I was confused and scared thinking i had done something horrible that I wasn’t aware of. I guess what I’m trying to say is that in the end we were not a group of monsters who only spoke to eachother to hate on other people for no reason but instead a group of friends who were wrongly and harshly accused of heinous acts of which we did not commit.

[romancedream]

I just wanted to post this for those who said that showrunners shouldn't have to work with "someone with allegations."

#dannyelfman is a confirmed women abuser, not just " someone with allegations," yet #milesmillar, @goughalfred , @netflix, and @timburton continue to work with him to this day. In both @wednesdaynetflix season 2 and @beetlejuicemovie 😡😠😤.

So, for those of you claiming that @percy wasn't dropped from the series because of his allegations, you're right; these big companies and producers don't care about SA allegations, accusations, or women's safety on the sets.

#percyhyneswhite was expelled from the show BECAUSE HE WAS GETTING BULLIED by Fangirls!! 😡😤

And for those @percy fans who still deny why and how he was dropped. I am just wondering, is this how you behave in your own lives?? Do you watch your brothers, sisters, friends, and other family members get bullied and harassed and do nothing about it except say a few words? Do you deny it completely? Do you let them lose opportunities and jobs because of the relentless abuse?? Do you cower around while they get slandered and their reputation gets ruined before your eyes??

Because that would be a true shame 🤦‍♀️

Why are we still tolerating this kind of behavior in 2024?!

We should be launching a #canceling campaign against all of these men !!

[gregorovitch-adler]

Title: Clandestine Meetings.

Fandom: ACD canon (and related).

Pairing: Sherlock Holmes/Original Female Character (unrequited love from OC's side).

Rating: T.

Words: 19,539.

Chapters: 8/8

Summary:

Devi Dey has moved from India to London, England with her husband Debashish Dey. Mr Dey has to face injustice at workplace, and that is how Mrs Dey ends up at 221 B Baker Street, asking Holmes and Watson for help.

Mr and Mrs Dey's marriage does not seem to work quite well, and Mrs Dey ends up falling for Mr Sherlock Holmes during the process of his crime solving with Dr Watson's assistance.

Mrs Dey has to deal with two things: the uncertainty of her husband's job, and the feelings that she has developed for the great detective.

--

Hello everyone! @nowiamcoveredinyou and I wrote a fanfic based on the original stories. It's a case fic, exploring a case adventure and the sentiments that Devi Dey develops for Holmes.

Check out the link! We hope you like it. 😊

Tags: @helloliriels @lisbeth-kk @calaisreno @keirgreeneyes @jamielovesjam @peanitbear @gaylilsherlock @totallysilvergirl , etc.

[therealjohnlennon]

Really John? Foot fetish?

what

[chloeworships]

I DONT HAVE WORDS….

Also, trumped up charges, could be about someone else, too

The Definition: 👇🏾

[sleepycuga]

Angy post, so get ready

....Fuck fake allegations.

People who create false evidence to ruin someone's life can take a big Fuck you there faces. To people who use another innocent person as a victim to create them, to people who do it to someone they dislike/hate, to people who justify them because they dislike someone.

Just.. Fuck you

Sorry for the rant. I just had thoughts about it this morning, and I had to say something.

To all people who suffered from false allegations.

I'm Sorry and I hope you stay safe.

[soksandicey]

Ik potomer is not in the thing but still Im starting to Ask question about Life is all of real?

Whos is tierd of this

[starbitdrag0n]

Response to IzzyFredPony's debunk doc - Here's my point of view

After seeing the google doc made by the user IzzyFredPony, I've decided that it would be best to share my own side of the story, this includes what pushed me to quit her friend circle and so on.

I have been trying to move on ever since what happened and I need to speak up.

Izzy was the first to come and interact with me back on Deviantart. I then decided to move to Tumblr and that's basically where we started talking a bit more. I had made a post about creating my own server and this led to me joining hers afterwards. I thought she was really sweet at first, but something felt off. Before joining her server, she would ask for others' socials to check if they weren't ‘weird’. The server seemed nice, the people on there were kind, yet I could still feel that something was wrong. I had this constant feeling like I was walking on eggs, anything that could be said by someone or worded wrong could possibly create trouble (which happened at a moment but I do not want to come back to this drama). Anything that could be slightly ‘inappropriate’ could quickly blow out of proportion, at one point it even got me scared of sharing a drawing I made of my gijinka of Mercury;

My fears were fueled back when I vented in her server about someone cancelling a commission because I am friends with Frida. I remember panicking quite a lot when that happened and was also angered by how this what was supposed to be some private drama ended up involving innocent people and affecting others such as me in a negative way.

Knowing Izzy’s point of view about Frida was also scaring me, from my point of view she didn't seem understanding at all, I felt like my feelings were being dismissed. Since that day, I was always feeling out of place or in the wrong for having my own feelings and opinion on the situation. It left me scared of even gathering the courage to go and tell her how I felt about certain stuff, thinking she'd be dismissing my feelings again. With time and how those things has affected me, it made me question my friendship with those people in her server. Later on, I slowly stepped away, becoming pretty much inactive there, until I finally left because I was feeling unwanted and out of place. Other things happened with a friend that was in Izzy's server in the meantime, I ended up finding out they had talked behind my back, this pushed me to unfollow the group and remove them from my followers. I only did this for my own good and mental health and didn't mean to start any big drama after leaving. I later found out Izzy talked about it in her server, others joining in and adding more things about me. I did go to confront Izzy out of pure anger and shock, it was not very mature of me either, but in my opinion she could've simply come to me privately to talk things out instead of talking like this behind my back in her venting channel, she could've at least made the mature step of trying to talk things out privately in dms. This was also the day I took the decision to block the others that were in this server, not because I was angry at them, but to leave what has been hurting me personally and move on easily.

Yes, I may have acted in the wrong way due to my extreme meltdowns, and sadly when those happen, I have a hard time controlling the way I react. It makes me do things I later regret, such as me leaving the server multiple times. As for the comfort others were giving me, I did acknowledge it, but due to past experiences, both IRL and online, I've grown up having difficulty believing others and trusting people.

Then came the grooming accusations that were made by the user Bubbly-Peaches. For me, this was the point where things had gone too far, and I felt the need to try and speak up, in hopes to put an end to this. I never intended on doing this to hurt anyone else.

As those events accumulated with time, it eventually got too much for me and pushed me into trying to take my own life on the third of December (2024).

I wish leaving a group of people wouldn't have led to this, but it has gone too far.

[youngtreetheorist]

Debunking the False Narratives Surrounding Drake Bell

Drake Bell Moved to Mexico:

Truth: Drake Bell never moved to Mexico. He has been traveling there since 2008, and this has nothing to do with his legal case. He has always had a large fan base in Mexico since 2008. "Drake Campana" is not his stage name and never has been it was merely a joke on social media, nothing more. In 2024 He did stay in mexico for a few months to work on his album.

False: Drake Bell went to jail and is currently wanted.

Truth: Drake Bell never went to jail for the 2021 case; he received probation. The only time he spent a few days in jail was for a DUI in 2015. He is not wanted and does not have an active warrant.

Drake Bell Changed His Name to Avoid Legal Issues:

False: Some people have claimed that Drake changed his name to "Drake Campana" to escape legal troubles in the U.S.

Truth: .Drake Campana is not his stage name and never was. It was just a joke on social media. Nothing else.

False: Rumors suggest that Drake Bell has been banned from Hollywood due to legal troubles.

Truth: Drake has continued to release music and has performed in both the U.S. and Mexico. He has faced legal challenges, but there is no ban preventing him from working in Hollywood.

Drake Bell Was Convicted of Child Abuse:

False: Some reports have exaggerated his legal case, stating that he was convicted of child abuse.

Truth: In 2021, Drake pleaded guilty to attempted child endangerment and disseminating harmful material to a minor, related to inappropriate communications. He was sentenced to probation and community service, not for child abuse.

Drake Bell Is a Pedophile and Groomer:

False: Some individuals have labeled Drake Bell as a pedophile and a groomer, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and accusations.

Truth: There is no credible evidence to support these claims. Drake has faced legal issues stemming from inappropriate communications with a minor, but these allegations have been mischaracterized. Investigations have shown that he is not a pedophile, and he has not been convicted of any related crimes. The accusations of grooming are also unfounded and have been dismissed in light of the evidence.

Drake Bell was charged with child endangerment and a misdemeanor count of disseminating matter harmful to juveniles, not because he sent explicit pictures, but due to the nature of the communication with a minor. Here's a breakdown:

Child Endangerment: Ohio law holds adults accountable for engaging with minors in ways that could harm or exploit them, even if the adult is unaware of the minor’s age at first. In Drake’s case, although he didn’t send explicit images, the law considered his communication with a minor as reckless, especially after learning her age.

Disseminating Harmful Matter: This charge typically relates to sharing content inappropriate for minors. In this case, the messages exchanged, though not explicit in terms of images, were deemed harmful or inappropriate for someone of her age by the court. The charge doesn't always require the sharing of explicit pictures—messages themselves can be considered harmful.

Essentially, he was charged for inappropriate communication with a minor and for not being more cautious once her age became known, which is why the law still held him accountable.

Some people think child endangerment is the same as a pedophile or grooming charge, but it's not. Here's an explanation of the difference:

Child endangerment refers to actions that put a child's safety at risk, such as neglect or reckless behavior, without involving sexual misconduct. Pedophilia or grooming, on the other hand, involves an adult's inappropriate or exploitative behavior toward a minor for sexual purposes. These are separate and distinct charges with different legal definitions and implications. In Drake’s case, he blocked her when he found out her age, proving he had no intention of talking to or being with a minor.

The child endangerment charge against Drake Bell arose because the individual involved was a minor, and her interactions with him, though based on lies she told and actions she took, caused harm. In Ohio, the law does not consider the minor’s deception as a mitigating factor for the charge. Child endangerment refers to actions that put a child's safety at risk, such as neglect or reckless behavior, without involving sexual misconduct. This charge is distinct from offenses like pedophilia or grooming, which involve an adult’s exploitative behavior toward a minor for sexual purposes. These terms have separate legal definitions and implications.

In Drake Bell's case, he blocked the individual once he discovered her real age, demonstrating that he had no intention of continuing communication or pursuing any relationship with a minor. The charge of child endangerment does not imply any sexual misconduct or intent. Instead, it reflects the perceived risk to the minor’s well-being caused by the situation.

Grooming refers to deliberate and manipulative behavior aimed at building trust with a minor to prepare them for future exploitation, often of a sexual nature. Pedophilia describes an adult's sexual attraction to minors but does not always involve illegal behavior unless acted upon. These distinctions are critical for accurate legal and social discussions, as conflating these terms can diminish the seriousness and specificity of each issue. Protecting minors from harm and exploitation requires clarity in understanding these offenses.

Drake Bell did not send any pictures to the individual and ended their communication upon learning her real age. Evidence from the investigation supports this, showing that he had no intention of engaging with or pursuing a minor. The individual involved had initially met him in person at his meet-and-greet events. However, he had no idea who he was communicating with online because she used a fake account. Investigation notes revealed that she operated multiple accounts, which further complicated the situation.

The conversation between Drake and the individual began when she was 15, and her online profile depicted her as older. This included images of her drinking and appearing more mature. Evidence, including witness accounts and investigation findings, confirmed that Drake was never alone with her at any point. Alleged pictures were merely reactions to his public stories; he never sent any direct images. Additionally, the individual admitted to using multiple accounts and fabricating details about herself. Investigation notes also revealed that she had an obsessive fixation on him and sought revenge for his decision to get married.

These details underscore the importance of distinguishing between legal charges and public perceptions. In Drake Bell’s case, the facts demonstrate that he did not engage in grooming or any form of predatory behavior. Instead, the situation was driven by the deception and actions of the minor involved, alongside legal interpretations of child endangerment that focus on the minor’s well-being.

Jane Doe Lied:

Presenting evidence that Jane Doe lied is not "slut-shaming" or calling her "nuts." It’s simply stating the truth.

She lied about therapy.

She made new accusations during sentencing that no one had heard of before, which even the prosecution couldn’t address because they were hearing it for the first time.

Investigations and witnesses confirmed she was never alone with Drake. She even admitted it herself.

No Pictures Sent by Drake:

Drake has openly stated in an interview that authorities recovered everything, including their conversations.

The pictures she referenced were on her side of the chat—Drake never sent any pictures. When Drake found out her real age, he blocked her immediately.

Snapchat Incident:

Jane Doe stalked Janet and contacted her through Snapchat. Janet replied, saying, “I can’t get him to unblock you,” and even added Drake to the chat. Jane Doe’s response to Drake was, “You blocked me,” further proving she was lying.

Jane Doe also admitted to Janet on Snapchat that she had multiple accounts.

Support and Defense:

In Brian’s case, the prosecution and others supported the victim. In Drake’s case with Brian, the prosecution defended him, as did his family. No one defended Jane Doe—not the prosecution, not her friends, not her family.

Do you ever wonder why that was? It’s because they knew she was lying. That’s why the prosecution didn’t say anything at sentencing.

Even the judge in Drake’s 2001 trial said, “This isn’t a sex case.”

False claim: Drake Bell kidnapped Jane Doe. Truth: Drake Bell was unable to enter Canada due to his DUIs, making this accusation highly unlikely. Additionally, Jane Doe's aunt drove her everywhere, further disproving the claim. There is no verified evidence to suggest that Jane Doe traveled across state lines with Drake Bell or under his direction. Allegations of this nature require substantial proof, which has not been presented. Jane Doe's own statements and the timeline of events indicate that her aunt drove her everywhere. This undermines the claim that Drake Bell had any involvement in her travel or movements. For such a claim to rise to the level of a felony, prosecutors would need to demonstrate intent and action on Drake Bell's part. Given his documented inability to enter Canada due to DUIs and the logistical details of Jane Doe's movements, this claim lacks the necessary foundation. Considering Jane Doe's earlier claims and the proven inconsistencies in her accusations, it is plausible that this statement is another exaggerated or fabricated assertion.

Drake Bell Is Broke and Homeless:

False: There have been persistent rumors that Drake Bell is broke and homeless.

Truth: While Drake did file for bankruptcy in 2014, he has since continued his music career, performing in the U.S. and Mexico, suggesting that he's financially stable.

Drake Bell Is Retired from the Entertainment Industry:

False: Some rumors suggest Drake has retired completely from acting and music.

Truth: He remains active, especially in his music career, and continues to release new albums and perform live.

Melissa Lingafelt's Abuse Allegations Were Proven True:

False: Some believe that Melissa Lingafelt’s allegations of abuse were proven true.

Truth: Melissa’s allegations were never proven, and she provided fake documents before deleting her TikTok where she made the claims.

TMZ has always been on top of breaking celebrity news, often being the first to report when a celebrity passes or when major stories unfold. If Melissa had actually filed a police report, TMZ would’ve known about it immediately, and they would’ve reported it. However, no one could find the report using the document number. When Melissa was called out on this, she deleted all her TikToks. It's also suspicious that she made these claims right after her friend, Lil Tracy, faced rape allegations, and she even threatened to kidnap and harm other women. You can see it for yourself at https://x.com/jimiono_lies. I believe Melissa fabricated the story to take the heat off her friend and for personal gain.

*  On Melissa’s Twitter, she posted pictures of Drake in 2016 and 2017 as 'Throwback Thursday' posts. It does seem odd to post pictures of someone you later accuse of abuse. On her TikTok before it was deleted, she maintained a box with their pictures together.Drake helped her financially in 2019.

Drake Bell Is an Abuser:

False: Some rumors claim that Drake Bell is an abuser, pointing to allegations made by others.

Truth: Drake has consistently denied any allegations of abuse against him. While he pleaded guilty to attempted child endangerment and disseminating harmful material to a minor, there has been no credible evidence or conviction of physical or sexual abuse. Furthermore, allegations made against him, such as those by Melissa Lingafelt, have been proven false through investigations and lack of evidence. Additionally, there is no evidence to support claims of him abusing his ex wife.

Drake Bell's Career Was Destroyed Solely by His Legal Issues:

False: It’s often suggested that his career downfall was entirely due to his legal issues.

Truth: While legal problems have impacted his public image, he has maintained a significant fan base, especially in Latin America, where his Spanish music has found success.

Drake Bell Is a Registered Sex Offender:

False: Some media outlets, including The New York Times, have falsely labeled Drake as a registered sex offender.

Truth: Drake Bell is not a registered sex offender. He pleaded guilty to attempted child endangerment and disseminating harmful material to a minor, but these charges do not classify him as a sex offender under U.S. law.

Drake Bell Committed a Serious Felony:

False: It has been widely circulated that Drake committed serious felony crimes and would be imprisoned for a long time.

Truth: The charges were misdemeanors, and he was sentenced to probation and community service, not long-term imprisonment.

Drake Bell Can No Longer Enter the United States:

False: There have been rumors that Drake is banned from entering the U.S. due to legal or personal issues.

Truth: Drake continues to travel between the U.S. and Mexico for performances, proving that he is not banned from entering the U.S.

Drake Bell Admitted to All Accusations in Court:

False: Some claims suggest that Drake admitted to all accusations brought against him.

Truth: He pleaded guilty to the charges of attempted child endangerment and disseminating harmful material to a minor, but the allegations against him were proven false by witnesses and investigations. He has consistently denied these other accusations.

Even though Drake Bell pled guilty, that does not mean he is guilty in the true sense. Many people take plea deals for various reasons, such as avoiding a harsher sentence, financial constraints, or simply because they feel pressured by the legal system. Pleading guilty does not always equal actual guilt.

Here are some people who pled guilty but were later exonerated:

The Central Park Five (now the Exonerated Five) – These five teenagers falsely confessed to a crime they didn’t commit due to intense police pressure. Years later, DNA evidence and the real perpetrator's confession proved their innocence.

Brian Banks – A promising football player who pled no contest to avoid a potential life sentence after being falsely accused of rape. His accuser later admitted she lied, and his conviction was overturned.

The West Memphis Three – Three teenagers (Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley) were convicted of murdering three young boys in 1993. Under pressure, Misskelley, who had an intellectual disability, falsely confessed. Years later, new DNA evidence showed they were innocent. In 2011, they took an Alford plea, maintaining their innocence while pleading guilty to secure their release.

The Richard Jewell Case (1996) Richard Jewell, a security guard, was wrongfully accused of bombing Centennial Olympic Park during the Atlanta Olympics. Although he was never formally charged, he was subjected to intense public scrutiny and media pressure, leading some to believe he might have been coerced into falsely confessing. Eventually, the FBI cleared him of all suspicion.

The Norfolk Four (1997) Four Navy sailors—Danial Williams, Derek Tice, Joseph Dick, and Eric Wilson—were convicted of the rape and murder of a woman in Norfolk, Virginia. They were pressured into pleading guilty, though their confessions were inconsistent with the evidence. They later maintained their innocence, and after years of legal battles, DNA evidence helped to exonerate them, proving they were innocent.

The 'Adnan Syed' Case (1999) While this case is better known due to the "Serial" podcast, Syed was initially convicted of the murder of his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee. Many argue that Syed, who is of Asian descent, may have pled guilty or was coerced due to a flawed investigation. He maintained his innocence for years, and his case was eventually reopened, resulting in a retrial where his conviction was overturned.

Alford Pleas (Used in Wrongful Convictions) – Some innocent people accept plea deals (Alford pleas) where they maintain their innocence but plead guilty to get a lesser sentence. Examples include Henry Alford himself and others who later had their convictions overturned.

Drake Bell’s situation shows how the legal system isn’t always about truth but about negotiation and pressure. Just because someone pleads guilty doesn’t mean they actually did what they’re accused of.

Drake Bell Stopped Making Music:

False: Some rumors suggest Drake quit making music after his legal issues.

Truth: Drake has continued to release new music, including his recent album Non-Stop Flight, and he remains an active performer, particularly in Mexico.

Drake Bell Is a Trump Supporter:

False: While some public figures are vocal about their political affiliations, Drake Bell has not publicly endorsed Donald Trump or aligned himself with any particular political figure. No credible sources have confirmed that he is a Trump supporter.

Drake Bell Is Transphobic:

False: There have been no verifiable reports or actions suggesting that Drake Bell has made transphobic comments or displayed transphobic behavior. These rumors likely stem from misinformation or misinterpretation of statements.

Drake Bell Is Homophobic:

False: Drake has not been known to make any homophobic remarks, and there is no public evidence to suggest he holds homophobic views. Any claims to the contrary appear to be baseless. Drake Bell has shown support for the victims of the Pulse nightclub tragedy by making a donation and visiting the site to pay his respects.

There was also a false allegation that Drake groomed a Mexican girl named Nora. Nora is an adult. Nora herself denied these claims and asked people to stop spreading them. She only knows Drake because he’s friends with her father. Another accusation claimed he moved to Mexico to groom children due to the lower age of consent, but this, too, was unfounded.

Here are some sources I have gathered. I am currently working on obtaining more and am waiting for documents from other sources.

FFDB Project (@FFDBProject) / X

Matt Wallace on X: "⚠️ PEDOWOOD EXPOSED MANUFACTURING FAKE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ABUSED CHILDREN TO SILENCE THEM ⚠️ https://t.co/wwpzQ7glnd" / X

Drake Bell explains child endangerment guilty plea

False accusations were a nightmare for Drake Bell and his family - YouTube

***Court documents ( I just want to point out that the documents available online are only the initial investigation. Not all the evidence is included. Some of the pages lack timestamps, and others are out of order. There are a total of 1,000 pages of documents, and you need to request access to obtain them all.)

I want to point it out. The pictures and court documents online are the initial investigations. Not the full investigation. That’s why so much information is missing. The initial police report is not proof of guilt, as investigations always start with broad allegations that may not result in formal charges. While the report mentions sexual assault, Drake Bell was never charged with or convicted of that crime—he was only charged with child endangerment. If prosecutors had sufficient evidence for a sex crime, they would have pursued it instead of offering a plea deal for a lesser charge. Bell pled guilty due to financial constraints, the impact of COVID, and his newborn son, not to avoid being placed on the sex offender registry. He was never required to register, which would have been mandatory if the case involved actual sexual misconduct. Additionally, Jane Doe’s accusations evolved, yet prosecutors still only pursued the lesser charge, indicating they did not find evidence to support more serious claims. This document is simply internal police note from the early stages of the investigation and does not reflect the final legal outcome. The initial investigation took place before witnesses, evidence, and further investigation proved that he was never alone with Jane Doe, he did not send pictures, and he blocked her after she revealed her age.

Trial Video

So there you have it—many of the false narratives surrounding Drake Bell debunked. From misconceptions about his legal issues to rumors about his family life, it’s clear that misinformation can easily spread. Drake has taken accountability for his actions by going to rehab and seeking therapy. He has openly admitted to his past behaviors, which shows personal growth and a commitment to change. It’s important to remember that Drake Bell doesn’t owe us any further details about his life. We should respect the privacy of celebrities and not harass them for things we know nothing about. Everyone deserves a chance to move forward without being constantly scrutinized. Thanks for Reading, and remember, always seek the truth! Don’t spread rumors or misinformation without evidence. No one should be harassed to the point of feeling suicidal. Always remember what Thumper said in Bambi: 'If you can't say anything nice, don’t say anything at all.

[qaytesquorner]

False accusations are extremely rare, and even real cases rarely give more punishment than a slap on the wrist

[making-poopo-xddd]

CW: feet, tickling, ableism, false sexual harassment allegations

context for the last post, @bird-enthusiast-hq was invited to a small friend group by friend A earlier that morning because they thought he was cool. It was all fine until a few hours later. We were joking around, and I said (as a joke) that I was gonna tickle his feet. I do want to note that our friend group server has a mutual interest of feet/tickling, and friend A found Dio (@bird-enthusiast-hq) from a tickling/feet server. I've said this to other server members as a joke before, even ones who didn't have a foot fetish. I also indicated that this was a joke. However, he immediately got aggressive, but I assumed that he was joking because of him not using tone indicators, which caused him to become even more aggressive. I left the server to calm down, and for the most part, other people agreed he was in the wrong. However, when I came back, he tried starting things again even though other people were telling him not to. I do want to mention that he never indicated that he was genuinely uncomfortable with feet, and I had absolutely no idea that this was a trigger for him. He did mention that he didn't have a foot fetish, though, which is the only thing he mentioned when it came to feet. He ended up leaving the server, but dmed friend B and friend A. Friend A was there to witness the entire thing and took my side on it, but friend B was offline until he dmed them. He falsely accused me of being a creep and sexual predator as a way to turn everyone against me, and was temporarily able to turn friend B against me due to me allegedly "telling him to kill himself" without proof.. Friend B left the server while friend A pretended to be on Dio's side of the situation. Dio was spreading nothing but lies and kept out a lot of context, such as the fact that he never mentioned ANYTHING about having a discomfort for feet. If he did, then none of this would be happening. He also attempted to get me banned in another server but was banned due to not having any proof for such serious allegations.

Dio, I know you're reading this. I hope you know how much of a disgusting sack of shit you are. Instead of holding yourself accountable for YOUR mistakes, you instead decided to double down and attempt to destroy my image. You're an ableist liar and a horrible human being, and I hope you have the life you deserve. Leave me and my friends the fuck alone, thanks <3

[romancedream]

@ememyers shades her and Jenna's fandom 😎...

the cast members of @wednesdaynetflix are coming to terms with what caused @percy so much harm : openly shipping Wednesday and Enid... 🥺

All of these actors got harassed and bullied, and Percy's reputation and career may never recover because of the disgusting fandoms : #Wenclair and #jemma

[bumble66]

False SA allegations are apparently less terrifying than coming out as gay?!

Trigger Warning: Discussions about SA and casting couch. I recently saw this reblog from blea74. There someone claims to have worked for CAA, the PR firm Chris Evans is still under. You can read everything this person said here:

Something important was mentioned that some people still deny when I talk to them privately about this whole Portugal PR mess: "but to my understanding and digging a little deeper, there was some tantrums on both sides here. Chris not wanting to do things, and her forcing it by whatever nonsense she has in her pocket. I will divulge my suspicions of that, but it's probably within your imagination. And yes CAA suits would do that. They would also tell the parties involved it's over or "do this and you're finished" and then change their mind. As long as the date on the paper hasn't expired they can really do whatever they want." When confronting people with the fact that Hollywood is basically a mafia, many refuse to believe me because it sounds too much like a conspiracy theory. However, not too long ago I came across this article:

I don't know much about Vin Diesel because I don't watch idiot movies like Fast & Furious (I actually only like horror movies) but it doesn't matter which social media platform, almost every time Vin Diesel is written about in connection to the SA allegations, many people in the comment sections reply: "How? He is gay." Where there is smoke, there is fire and just because someone has children and wife, doesn't mean they are hetero. See: Will Smith or John Travolta.

Shortly after the allegations against Diesel, I saw this discussion by a youtube channel called HoneyBadgerRadio:

At 33:50 the discussion becomes interesting in relation to our PR theories. They already started to talk about Vin Diesel before my time stamp but at 33:50, the celebrity expert called Lauren B comes on the show and discusses how this accusation could just be PR to make Vin Diesel appear as a "masculine" straight man. The discussion I highlight goes on until 48:14. I recommend listening to these 15 minutes but the most important thing you'll learn is that: False allegations are apparently less terriyfing than coming out as gay. I remember a similar story regarding this soccer player called Ronaldo or something... but I digress.

And when you think about it: Hollywood is hypocritical again! They push the agenda that toxic masculinity is bad but use examples of toxic macho behavior to promote their stars??! And it also demonstrates to what lenghts some of these PR firms go in order to paint a certain narrative. So when an anonymous CAA anon claims that Chris and other celeb dudes could be forced into certain behavior, unless they want to kiss their careers good-bye, it is actually not so hard to believe.