#Dispute Settlement
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Best Industrial Acoustic Consultancy | Noise Survey and Dispute Settlement - Thermosonics
0 notes
Text
By offering and grasping each other's penis – said to represent "paying with one's life" – the men make an avowal of mutual support and goodwill between them, or symbolize and solidify the agreement they have reached during the settling of a dispute.
"Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity" - Bruce Bagemihl
#book quote#biological exuberance#bruce bagemihl#nonfiction#support#goodwill#agreement#dispute settlement#indigenous australians#walbiri#aranda#warlpiri people#arrernte people#mutual trust
0 notes
Text
End of the line for corporate sovereignty
I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me next weekend (Mar 30/31) in ANAHEIM at WONDERCON, then in Boston with Randall "XKCD" Munroe (Apr 11), then Providence (Apr 12), and beyond!
Back in the 1950s, a new, democratically elected Iranian government nationalized foreign oil interests. The UK and the US then backed a coup, deposing the progressive government with one more hospitable to foreign corporations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalization_of_the_Iranian_oil_industry
This nasty piece of geopolitical skullduggery led to the mother-of-all-blowbacks: the Anglo-American puppet regime was toppled by the Ayatollah and his cronies, who have led Iran ever since.
For the US and the UK, the lesson was clear: they needed a less kinetic way to ensure that sovereign countries around the world steered clear of policies that undermined the profits of their oil companies and other commercial giants. Thus, the "investor-state dispute settlement" (ISDS) was born.
The modern ISDS was perfected in the 1990s with the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The ECT was meant to foam the runway for western corporations seeking to take over ex-Soviet energy facilities, by making those new post-Glasnost governments promise to never pass laws that would undermine foreign companies' profits.
But as Nick Dearden writes for Jacobin, the western companies that pushed the east into the ECT failed to anticipate that ISDSes have their own form of blowback:
https://jacobin.com/2024/03/energy-charter-treaty-climate-change/
When the 2000s rolled around and countries like the Netherlands and Denmark started to pass rules to limit fossil fuels and promote renewables, German coal companies sued the shit out of these governments and forced them to either back off on their democratically negotiated policies, or to pay gigantic settlements to German corporations.
ISDS settlements are truly grotesque: they're not just a matter of buying out existing investments made by foreign companies and refunding them money spent on them. ISDS tribunals routinely order governments to pay foreign corporations all the profits they might have made from those investments.
For example, the UK company Rockhopper went after Italy for limiting offshore drilling in response to mass protests, and took $350m out of the Italian government. Now, Rockhopper only spent $50m on Adriatic oil exploration – the other $300m was to compensate Rockhopper for the profits it might have made if it actually got to pump oil off the Italian coast.
Governments, both left and right, grew steadily more outraged that ISDSes tied the hands of democratically elected lawmakers and subordinated their national sovereignty to corporate sovereignty. By 2023, nine EU countries were ready to pull out of the ECT.
But the ECT had another trick up its sleeve: a 20-year "sunset" clause that bound countries to go on enforcing the ECT's provisions – including ISDS rulings – for two decades after pulling out of the treaty. This prompted European governments to hit on the strategy of a simultaneous, mass withdrawal from the ECT, which would prevent companies registered in any of the ex-ECT countries from suing under the ECT.
It will not surprise you to learn that the UK did not join this pan-European coalition to wriggle out of the ECT. On the one hand, there's the Tories' commitment to markets above all else (as the Trashfuture podcast often points out, the UK government is the only neoliberal state so committed to austerity that it's actually dismantling its own police force). On the other hand, there's Rishi Sunak's planet-immolating promise to "max out North Sea oil."
But as the rest of the world transitions to renewables, different blocs in the UK – from unions to Tory MPs – are realizing that the country's membership in ECT and its fossil fuel commitment is going to make it a world leader in an increasingly irrelevant boondoggle – and so now the UK is also planning to pull out of the ECT.
As Dearden writes, the oil-loving, market-worshipping UK's departure from the ECT means that the whole idea of ISDSes is in danger. After all, some of the world's poorest countries are also fed up to the eyeballs with ISDSes and threatening to leave treaties that impose them.
One country has already pulled out: Honduras. Honduras is home to Prospera, a libertarian autonomous zone on the island of Roatan. Prospera was born after a US-backed drug kingpin named Porfirio Lobo Sosa overthrew the democratic government of Manuel Zelaya in 2009.
The Lobo Sosa regime established a system of special economic zones (known by their Spanish acronym, "ZEDEs"). Foreign investors who established a ZEDE would be exempted from Honduran law, allowing them to create "charter cities" with their own private criminal and civil code and tax system.
This was so extreme that the Honduran supreme court rejected the plan, so Lobo Sosa fired the court and replaced them with cronies who'd back his play.
A group of crypto bros capitalized on this development, using various ruses to establish a ZEDE on the island of Roatan, a largely English-speaking, Afro-Carribean island known for its marine reserve, its SCUBA diving, and its cruise ship port. This "charter city" included every bizarre idea from the long history of doomed "libertarian exit" projects, so ably recounted in Raymond Craib's excellent 2022 book Adventure Capitalism:
https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/14/this-way-to-the-egress/#terra-nullius
Right from the start, Prospera was ill starred. Paul Romer, the Nobel-winning economist most closely associated with the idea of charter cities, disavowed the project. Locals hated it – the tourist shops and restaurants on Roatan all may sport dusty "Bitcoin accepted here" signs, but not one of those shops takes cryptocurrency.
But the real danger to Prospera came from democracy itself. When Xiomara Castro – wife of Manuel Zelaya – was elected president in 2021, she announced an end to the ZEDE program. Prospera countered by suing Honduras under the ISDS provisions of the Central America Free Trade Agreements, seeking $10b, a third of the country's GDP.
In response, President Castro announced her country's departure from CAFTA, and the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes:
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/19/honduras-crypto-investors-world-bank-prospera/
An open letter by progressive economists in support of President Castro condemns ISDSes for costing latinamerican countries $30b in corporate compensation, triggered by laws protecting labor rights, vulnerable ecosystems and the climate:
https://progressive.international/wire/2024-03-18-economists-the-era-of-corporate-supremacy-in-the-international-trade-system-is-coming-to-an-end/en
As Ryan Grim writes for The Intercept, the ZEDE law is wildly unpopular with the Honduran people, and Merrick Garland called the Lobo Sosa regime that created it "a narco-state where violent drug traffickers were allowed to operate with virtual impunity":
https://theintercept.com/2024/03/19/honduras-crypto-investors-world-bank-prospera/
The world's worst people are furious and terrified about Honduras's withdrawal from its ISDS. After 60+ years of wrapping democracy in chains to protect corporate profits, the collapse of the corporate kangaroo courts that override democratic laws represents a serious threat to oligarchy.
As Dearden writes, "elsewhere in the world, ISDS cases have been brought specifically on the basis that governments have not done enough to suppress protest movements in the interests of foreign capital."
It's not just poor countries in the global south, either. When Australia passed a plain-packaging law for tobacco, Philip Morris relocated offshore in order to bring an ISDS case against the Australian government in a bid to remove impediments to tobacco sales:
https://isds.bilaterals.org/?philip-morris-vs-australia-isds
And in 2015, the WTO sanctioned the US government for its "dolphin-safe" tuna labeling, arguing that this eroded the profits of corporations that fished for tuna in ways that killed a lot of dolphins:
https://theintercept.com/2015/11/24/wto-ruling-on-dolphin-safe-tuna-labeling-illustrates-supremacy-of-trade-agreements/
In Canada, the Conservative hero Steven Harper entered into the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement, which banned Canada from passing laws that undermined the profits of Chinese corporations for 31 years (the rule expires in 2045):
https://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/harper-oks-potentially-unconstitutional-china-canada-fipa-deal-coming-force-october-1
Harper's successor, Justin Trudeau, went on to sign the Canada-EU Trade Agreement that Harper negotiated, including its ISDS provisions that let EU corporations override Canadian laws:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-eu-parliament-schulz-ceta-1.3415689
There was a time when any challenge to ISDS was a political third rail. Back in 2015, even hinting that ISDSes should be slightly modified would send corporate thinktanks into a frenzy:
https://www.techdirt.com/2015/07/20/eu-proposes-to-reform-corporate-sovereignty-slightly-us-think-tank-goes-into-panic-mode/
But over the years, there's been a growing consensus that nations can only be sovereign if corporations aren't. It's one thing to treat corporations as "persons," but another thing altogether to elevate them above personhood and subordinate entire nations to their whims.
With the world's richest countries pulling out of ISDSes alongside the world's poorest ones, it's feeling like the end of the road for this particularly nasty form of corporate corruption.
And not a moment too soon.
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/27/korporate-kangaroo-kourts/#corporate-sovereignty
Image: ChrisErbach (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:UnitedNations_GeneralAssemblyChamber.jpg
CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
#pluralistic#isds#investor state dispute settlement#steven harper#canada#canpoli#ukpoli#honduras#prospera#roatan#Energy Charter Treaty#ect#eu#rockhopper#world bank#charter cities#cryptocurrency#libertarian exit#Xiomara Castro
221 notes
·
View notes
Text
Vy'keen do not sit like other pathetic lifeforms. Vy'keen will have the high ground.
#nms#no man's sky#nms photography#nms: npc#this is from my one and only settlement I've ever had#my beautiful empire of dirt (the only thing they export)#anyway came in to settle the newest dispute and just had this guy sitting there waiting for me#truly a power move#penumbra's pics
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
not a day goes by where i don’t hear about another privacy/data breach
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
#european court of justice#ecj fines#hungary#asylum seekers#brussels#belgium#hungarian universities#erasmus dispute settlement#Erasmus+ and Horizon Europe funds#restrictions on asylum rights
0 notes
Text
IR35 Tax Appeals: Gary Lineker's Off-Payroll Working Dispute with HMRC
What Is IR35, and How Does It Relate to Gary Lineker? IR35, the UK’s off-payroll working legislation, is designed to prevent tax avoidance by individuals who provide services through intermediaries, such as Personal Service Companies (PSCs), but work in a manner similar to employees. This legislation ensures that such workers pay the appropriate income tax and National Insurance…
#Contractors#First Tier Tax Tribunal#Freelancers#HMRC#HMRC Account Freezing Orders#HMRC appeal#HMRC Costs#HMRC Investigations#HMRC Petition#HMRC Policy#hmrc settlement#HMRC statutory demand#HMRC Tax Appeal#HMRC Tax Assessment#HMRC Tax Disputes#IR35#IR35 Disputes#IR35 Employees#ir35 employers#IR35 legislation#IR35 Reforms#Tax Evasion#Tax Fraud#Tribunal Representation#Unpaid Tax#VAT
0 notes
Text
Do you want to locate the best e-commerce law consulting firm? Professional legal services are offered by Sattva Legal to e-commerce businesses. Our knowledgeable e-commerce lawyers specialize in regulatory compliance, contract management, consumer protection, and resolving e-commerce disputes. We provide comprehensive solutions to assist your online business's expansion in the competitive digital marketplace, as we are a leading e-commerce law practice. Trust Sattva Legal to provide you with competent legal counsel and effective conflict resolution. Join us for trusted, industry-specific legal support in the ever-evolving area of e-commerce law.
#Best E-Commerce Law Consulting Firm#Lawyers in India#Ecommerce Dispute Settlement#E-Commerce Law Firm#E-Commerce Law Consulting Firm#Sattva Legal
0 notes
Text
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Quashes FIR Following Mutual Settlement in Civil Dispute
The High Court allowed the quashing of the FIR and the criminal proceedings arising from it as the parties have settled their controversy. The court noted that while quashing should be exercised with caution, the amicable settlement between the parties in this case justifies the quashing of the FIR.
1. Background:
There was a civil dispute between the father of the petitioner and Respondent Suman Devi resulting in a FIR U/s 294IPC & 506IPC against Ashok Kumar. However, after the intervention of the members of the society, the matter was sorted and a settlement was arrived. Despite this settlement, the case proceeded, as such the petitioner Ashok Kumar sought relief from the court, arguing that the continuation of the criminal proceedings was unwarranted in light of the settlement.
Ashok Kumar v. Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir through Police Station R S Pura & Suman Devi
Crl. Misc. Case No. 189/2024
Before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Laddakh
Heard by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yusuf Wani J
2. Legal Issue:
Whether the FIR and subsequent criminal proceedings could be quashed under Section 482 of the CrPC (now Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, BNSS) on the basis of a mutual settlement between the parties, despite the non-compoundable nature of the offenses involved.
3. Argument of Parties:
Petitioner (Ashok Kumar): Argued that the criminal proceedings were a result of a civil dispute that had been settled amicably, and continuing the case would serve no purpose.
The petitioner emphasized that Apex Court has previously quashed similar proceedings to allow parties to live peacefully.
Respondent: Respondents did not dispute the settlement but highlighted the limitations of the law concerning the quashing of FIRs in non-compoundable offenses.
4. Court's Observation:
The court recognized that while FIRs generally should not be quashed solely because of a settlement between the parties, there are exceptional circumstances where such action is justified.
The court emphasized the importance of balancing the interests of justice with the societal impact of quashing criminal proceedings.
The court referred to precedents where quashing was allowed in similar cases involving personal disputes that were later resolved.
#Mutual Settlement#Civil Dispute#Section 482 CrPC#Section 528 BNSS#Non-Compoundable Offenses#Personal Animosity#Jammu & Kashmir High Court#Judicial Discretion#Quashing Criminal Proceedings#FIR Quashing
1 note
·
View note
Text
NCLT Kolkata Hears Explosive Allegations in INCAB Case
Advocate claims widespread fraud in resolution process, challenges loan legitimacy The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Kolkata continues to unravel complex accusations in the INCAB case. JAMSHEDPUR – The NCLT Kolkata bench, led by Members Arvind Devanathan and Bidisa Banerjee, heard startling allegations of fraud and mismanagement in the INCAB case today. Advocate Akhilesh Srivastava…
#Akhilesh Srivastava arguments#बिजनेस#business#corporate debt settlement#corporate fraud allegations#Jamshedpur business news#NCLT Kolkata INCAB case#non-performing assets controversy#resolution process dispute#Resolution Professional misconduct#SARFAESI Act violations#Tata Steel land acquisition
0 notes
Text
Excerpt from this story from Inside Climate News:
Before the sun set on his inauguration day, Joe Biden reversed a raft of his predecessor’s deregulation policies with the stroke of a pen. Among them was an order revoking the permit for the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline.
Canceling the project was a campaign pledge to address the climate crisis. But looming over that decision was the risk that an obscure but powerful international legal system could force the United States to pay billions of dollars to Keystone XL’s Canadian developer, TC Energy.
That system—embedded in thousands of trade and investment treaties—allows corporations to drag governments before panels of arbitrators, usually behind closed doors. Governments have been ordered to pay billions of dollars in damages to oil and mining companies for violating those treaties. While the system was intended to protect foreign investors from unfair treatment or asset seizure, many environmental advocates, lawyers and politicians say it is now being used to win awards from governments that enact new environmental regulations or raise taxes on polluting industries.
Increasingly, these critics warn the system threatens climate action by punishing governments that phase out fossil fuels.
The $15 billion claim TC Energy brought against the United States was one of the largest-ever in response to a climate policy. The company lost earlier this month, but the case was dismissed on a technicality and its outcome says nothing about other pending cases around the world.
Australia, Canada, Colombia and Slovenia are facing tens of billions of dollars in claims from companies for phasing out coal power plants, rejecting mining licenses or disallowing liquefied natural gas permits. In 2022, Italy was ordered to pay a British oil company roughly $200 million after offshore drilling restrictions upended the firm’s development plans.
In other countries, the system set up for these claims—investor-state dispute settlement, or ISDS—has driven up costs of closing coal power plants, prevented governments from canceling oil and gas licenses or otherwise impeded efforts to reduce fossil fuel use, government ministers and researchers say. Companies even win awards despite leaving behind environmental contamination, violating human rights or breaking national laws.
The ISDS system is uniquely daunting for governments because arbitrators overseeing the cases can award compensation not just for real losses but also for unearned, expected future profits. It’s a key reason awards can balloon into the billions of dollars.
Governments already face numerous practical and political obstacles as they attempt to move away from fossil fuels, said Canadian lawyer and professor Gus Van Harten, who has studied ISDS’s evolution for decades. “This system is providing an unwarranted and unexpected further minefield.”
As Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland, put it in a speech this year: “I cannot overstate just how perverse this is.”
1 note
·
View note
Text
APPRAISAL OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PROCESS AS A MEANS OF SETTLEMENT OF LABOUR DISPUTE IN NIGERIA
APPRAISAL OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PROCESS AS A MEANS OF SETTLEMENT OF LABOUR DISPUTE IN NIGERIA ABSTRACT Trade disputes, arising from disagreements between employers and employees, can significantly disrupt workplace productivity. This research explores collective bargaining, a legal settlement mechanism, as a means to address such disputes in Nigeria. The research adopts a doctrinal…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Pre-Action Protocols, Expert Evidence, and Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Guide to Efficient Legal Dispute Management
Paragraph 6 of the Pre-action Conduct of all proceedings confirms that if a relevant pre-action protocol exists, parties are required to follow it before initiating legal action. This ensures that both sides take certain preliminary steps, such as sharing information and exploring potential settlements, to possibly resolve the dispute without court intervention. If no specific protocol applies,…
View On WordPress
#Arbitration#Mediation#ADR#alternative dispute resolution#claimant responsibilities#cost-sharing#court procedures#CPR 35.4(1)#defendant responsibilities#dispute resolution#efficient dispute resolution#expert evidence#joint expert instruction#key documents exchange#legal compliance#legal costs#legal dispute management#legal dispute preparation#legal guidelines#legal transparency#litigation#negotiation#pre-action protocols#settlement options
0 notes
Text
Within a year of the first whites settling in Bowen, two million acres had been granted along the rivers of the hinterland.
"Killing for Country: A Family History" - David Marr
#book quote#killing for country#david marr#nonfiction#settlement#colonization#bowen#qld#queensland#australia#hinterland#land dispute
0 notes
Text
#Divorce attorney mediators#Mediation for lawsuit settlement#Eviction mediation services#Legal dispute mediation services#Divorce assistance mediation#Mediator for lawsuit
0 notes
Text
Legal Bases for Challenging a Will
The Gormley Law Office is pleased to share this information on estate litigation and challenging a will. In this article, we’re talking about the reasons, or legal bases, for contesting a will. If you have specific questions about your situation or you suspect there is something not quite right going on with a family member’s estate, give us a call at (866) 375-8940 to discuss your individual…
View On WordPress
#Attorney Involvement#Coercion#Contesting a Will#Deadline Stress#Errors in Will Execution#Estate Disputes#Estate Law#Estate planning#Executor Misconduct#Family Estate#Financial Settlement#Forgery#Fraud#Hot Water (Legal Consequences)#Inheritance Issues#Legal Basis for Will Contest#Legal Competence#Legal Consultation#Legal Reasons to Contest a Will#Legal Strategies#Litigation#Manipulation#Omitted Spouse or Child#Probate#Property Disputes#Settlement#Testator#Undue Influence#Will Revocation
0 notes