#prospera

[seakrisp]

assorted g witch drawings

[mostlysignssomeportents]

End of the line for corporate sovereignty

I'm on tour with my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me next weekend (Mar 30/31) in ANAHEIM at WONDERCON, then in Boston with Randall "XKCD" Munroe (Apr 11), then Providence (Apr 12), and beyond!

Back in the 1950s, a new, democratically elected Iranian government nationalized foreign oil interests. The UK and the US then backed a coup, deposing the progressive government with one more hospitable to foreign corporations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalization_of_the_Iranian_oil_industry

This nasty piece of geopolitical skullduggery led to the mother-of-all-blowbacks: the Anglo-American puppet regime was toppled by the Ayatollah and his cronies, who have led Iran ever since.

For the US and the UK, the lesson was clear: they needed a less kinetic way to ensure that sovereign countries around the world steered clear of policies that undermined the profits of their oil companies and other commercial giants. Thus, the "investor-state dispute settlement" (ISDS) was born.

The modern ISDS was perfected in the 1990s with the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). The ECT was meant to foam the runway for western corporations seeking to take over ex-Soviet energy facilities, by making those new post-Glasnost governments promise to never pass laws that would undermine foreign companies' profits.

But as Nick Dearden writes for Jacobin, the western companies that pushed the east into the ECT failed to anticipate that ISDSes have their own form of blowback:

https://jacobin.com/2024/03/energy-charter-treaty-climate-change/

When the 2000s rolled around and countries like the Netherlands and Denmark started to pass rules to limit fossil fuels and promote renewables, German coal companies sued the shit out of these governments and forced them to either back off on their democratically negotiated policies, or to pay gigantic settlements to German corporations.

ISDS settlements are truly grotesque: they're not just a matter of buying out existing investments made by foreign companies and refunding them money spent on them. ISDS tribunals routinely order governments to pay foreign corporations all the profits they might have made from those investments.

For example, the UK company Rockhopper went after Italy for limiting offshore drilling in response to mass protests, and took $350m out of the Italian government. Now, Rockhopper only spent $50m on Adriatic oil exploration – the other $300m was to compensate Rockhopper for the profits it might have made if it actually got to pump oil off the Italian coast.

Governments, both left and right, grew steadily more outraged that ISDSes tied the hands of democratically elected lawmakers and subordinated their national sovereignty to corporate sovereignty. By 2023, nine EU countries were ready to pull out of the ECT.

But the ECT had another trick up its sleeve: a 20-year "sunset" clause that bound countries to go on enforcing the ECT's provisions – including ISDS rulings – for two decades after pulling out of the treaty. This prompted European governments to hit on the strategy of a simultaneous, mass withdrawal from the ECT, which would prevent companies registered in any of the ex-ECT countries from suing under the ECT.

It will not surprise you to learn that the UK did not join this pan-European coalition to wriggle out of the ECT. On the one hand, there's the Tories' commitment to markets above all else (as the Trashfuture podcast often points out, the UK government is the only neoliberal state so committed to austerity that it's actually dismantling its own police force). On the other hand, there's Rishi Sunak's planet-immolating promise to "max out North Sea oil."

But as the rest of the world transitions to renewables, different blocs in the UK – from unions to Tory MPs – are realizing that the country's membership in ECT and its fossil fuel commitment is going to make it a world leader in an increasingly irrelevant boondoggle – and so now the UK is also planning to pull out of the ECT.

As Dearden writes, the oil-loving, market-worshipping UK's departure from the ECT means that the whole idea of ISDSes is in danger. After all, some of the world's poorest countries are also fed up to the eyeballs with ISDSes and threatening to leave treaties that impose them.

One country has already pulled out: Honduras. Honduras is home to Prospera, a libertarian autonomous zone on the island of Roatan. Prospera was born after a US-backed drug kingpin named Porfirio Lobo Sosa overthrew the democratic government of Manuel Zelaya in 2009.

The Lobo Sosa regime established a system of special economic zones (known by their Spanish acronym, "ZEDEs"). Foreign investors who established a ZEDE would be exempted from Honduran law, allowing them to create "charter cities" with their own private criminal and civil code and tax system.

This was so extreme that the Honduran supreme court rejected the plan, so Lobo Sosa fired the court and replaced them with cronies who'd back his play.

A group of crypto bros capitalized on this development, using various ruses to establish a ZEDE on the island of Roatan, a largely English-speaking, Afro-Carribean island known for its marine reserve, its SCUBA diving, and its cruise ship port. This "charter city" included every bizarre idea from the long history of doomed "libertarian exit" projects, so ably recounted in Raymond Craib's excellent 2022 book Adventure Capitalism:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/14/this-way-to-the-egress/#terra-nullius

Right from the start, Prospera was ill starred. Paul Romer, the Nobel-winning economist most closely associated with the idea of charter cities, disavowed the project. Locals hated it – the tourist shops and restaurants on Roatan all may sport dusty "Bitcoin accepted here" signs, but not one of those shops takes cryptocurrency.

But the real danger to Prospera came from democracy itself. When Xiomara Castro – wife of Manuel Zelaya – was elected president in 2021, she announced an end to the ZEDE program. Prospera countered by suing Honduras under the ISDS provisions of the Central America Free Trade Agreements, seeking $10b, a third of the country's GDP.

In response, President Castro announced her country's departure from CAFTA, and the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes:

https://theintercept.com/2024/03/19/honduras-crypto-investors-world-bank-prospera/

An open letter by progressive economists in support of President Castro condemns ISDSes for costing latinamerican countries $30b in corporate compensation, triggered by laws protecting labor rights, vulnerable ecosystems and the climate:

https://progressive.international/wire/2024-03-18-economists-the-era-of-corporate-supremacy-in-the-international-trade-system-is-coming-to-an-end/en

As Ryan Grim writes for The Intercept, the ZEDE law is wildly unpopular with the Honduran people, and Merrick Garland called the Lobo Sosa regime that created it "a narco-state where violent drug traffickers were allowed to operate with virtual impunity":

https://theintercept.com/2024/03/19/honduras-crypto-investors-world-bank-prospera/

The world's worst people are furious and terrified about Honduras's withdrawal from its ISDS. After 60+ years of wrapping democracy in chains to protect corporate profits, the collapse of the corporate kangaroo courts that override democratic laws represents a serious threat to oligarchy.

As Dearden writes, "elsewhere in the world, ISDS cases have been brought specifically on the basis that governments have not done enough to suppress protest movements in the interests of foreign capital."

It's not just poor countries in the global south, either. When Australia passed a plain-packaging law for tobacco, Philip Morris relocated offshore in order to bring an ISDS case against the Australian government in a bid to remove impediments to tobacco sales:

https://isds.bilaterals.org/?philip-morris-vs-australia-isds

And in 2015, the WTO sanctioned the US government for its "dolphin-safe" tuna labeling, arguing that this eroded the profits of corporations that fished for tuna in ways that killed a lot of dolphins:

https://theintercept.com/2015/11/24/wto-ruling-on-dolphin-safe-tuna-labeling-illustrates-supremacy-of-trade-agreements/

In Canada, the Conservative hero Steven Harper entered into the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement, which banned Canada from passing laws that undermined the profits of Chinese corporations for 31 years (the rule expires in 2045):

https://www.vancouverobserver.com/news/harper-oks-potentially-unconstitutional-china-canada-fipa-deal-coming-force-october-1

Harper's successor, Justin Trudeau, went on to sign the Canada-EU Trade Agreement that Harper negotiated, including its ISDS provisions that let EU corporations override Canadian laws:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-eu-parliament-schulz-ceta-1.3415689

There was a time when any challenge to ISDS was a political third rail. Back in 2015, even hinting that ISDSes should be slightly modified would send corporate thinktanks into a frenzy:

https://www.techdirt.com/2015/07/20/eu-proposes-to-reform-corporate-sovereignty-slightly-us-think-tank-goes-into-panic-mode/

But over the years, there's been a growing consensus that nations can only be sovereign if corporations aren't. It's one thing to treat corporations as "persons," but another thing altogether to elevate them above personhood and subordinate entire nations to their whims.

With the world's richest countries pulling out of ISDSes alongside the world's poorest ones, it's feeling like the end of the road for this particularly nasty form of corporate corruption.

And not a moment too soon.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/27/korporate-kangaroo-kourts/#corporate-sovereignty

Image: ChrisErbach (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:UnitedNations_GeneralAssemblyChamber.jpg

CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

[imdcathsmeow]

"Let's stop all this madness and become in-laws instead."

[sapper-in-the-wire]

[brontidepng]

gira gira / gwitch animatic

so uh the animatic i made can also be found on yt - https://youtu.be/VF6qBunkveM

will stetson's cover of gira gira can be found here - https://youtube.com/watch?v=dItZfqy6Q8s

and the original song by ado is here - https://youtube.com/watch?v=sOiMD45QGLs i love this song so much, please do give it a full listen! 

i love this song so much, please do give it a full listen!

[gil-notskajla]

prospera mercury commission for Dio | ko-fi | COMMISSIONS

ok this was silly highlight afterwards

[taikonaut-kaskara]

Evil women are so cool I love women who are just bad people

[kurayamineko]

[actual-haise]

[mappapapa]

[ladygwyndolin]

Ok grandma let's get you to bed

[lesbiangummybearmafia]

[royalvorpal]

Prospera the second she needs to make a point in an argument:

[loreofthejungle]

"Gentlemen, I have an important question for you. What if Gendo Ikari... was a milf?"

[fellow-traveller-05]

New WFM Episode Holy Shit

That was incredible. That ending went fucking hard. As did uhhhh. everything else jfc. 

That being said, as fucked as it was that Suletta didn’t react much to killing that dude, she didn’t have much other choice. He was less than a second away from pulling the trigger, and if he had, Miorine (and her dad) would be dead. I seriously doubt Aerial has any means of stopping a single human attacker, who is not in a mobile suit and has no protecting from its attacks, without killing them. Remember that Aerial is 1. a literal war machine and 2. designed to fight other mobile suits (and other forms of war machines.) I seriously doubt aerial could have picked him up or smt either w/o killing him. That was probably take a lot of concentration (if it’s even possible) and again Suletta had like a second. Like maybe she could have put Aerial’s hand between the shooter and Miorine. But that might have taken the extra fraction of a second she didn’t have. And who’s going to be thinking about that one the one they love is about to be shot?

As for her lack of a visible reaction to it, I think @xaldalneir has a point that it’s partly due to her neurodivergence leading her to fall back on playing things off, along with Miorine safety being the first thing on her mind. And also I think part of it is Prospera basically indoctrinating her into killing (which is fucked.) and teaching her a mentality which gamifies her problems. Which led to Suletta having already accepted she had to kill to protect the people she cared about. (which was kind of true.) And what’s the difference between killing someone who’s in a mech and someone who isn’t? All to say Suletta isn’t a sociopath or smt, and the whole thing really makes sense given her character and what came before.

Also hoping the whole divide between Suletta and Miorine doesn’t last too long, those sorts of plots tend to rub me the wrong way. That being said this show has my confidence. It doesn’t waste my time (the divide between them in the proceeding episodes was handled well.)

[acapulcopress]

Aceptan ciudadanos del Acapulco poniente y miembros de AHETA propuesta de Manuel Añorve

ACAPULCO, Gro. * Mayo 23, 2024. ) Especial El candidato al Senado de la República de la Coalición Fuerza y Corazón por México, Manuel Añorve Baños, realizó una caminata casa por casa por calles de la zona poniente de Acapulco, junto a la candidata a diputada Brisbane de los Santos. Añorve tocó las puertas de los ciudadanos, quienes las abrieron con gusto para escuchar el planteamiento de sus propuestas, como el regreso del Seguro Popular, Prospera y la reducción de edad, para que las personas puedan ingresar a los 60 años al programa de pensión para los Adultos Mayores, y no a los 65 años como está estipulado actualmente. Durante su recorrido por la Delegación Jardín, en la colonia Paraíso, Añorve Baños fue abordado por vecinos del lugar, quienes le recordaron las obras que ha realizado en esta parte de la ciudad, como las calles con concreto hidráulico, la unidad deportiva de la Jardin Azteca, y las canchas techadas de usos múltiples, ahí estuvo presente el dirigente estatal de la CTM, Rodolfo Escobar Ávila. Más tarde, sostuvo un encuentro con pescadores de la Federación del Clarín, presidida por José Delgado Vargas; ahí los pescadores le recordaron a Añorve que cuando fue presidente de Acapulco, logró liberarles el acceso al mar para que ellos pudieran ingresar a pescar con sus embarcaciones, y así poder generar economía para sus familias. Por la mañana, Manuel Añorve sostuvo un diálogo junto con el candidato a alcalde de Acapulco, con integrantes de la Asociación de Hoteles y Empresas Turísticas de Acapulco (AHETA), en este encuentro, el abanderado de la alianza Fuerza y Corazón por México, les dijo que es urgente que desde el gobierno federal se realice un plan y una estrategia que permita la reactivación turística del puerto. En este sentido, lamentó que no exista un programa real de apoyos para los empresarios, hoteleros y restauranteros, con el cual puedan reconstruir sus negocios, con los que generan cientos de fuentes de empleos, por lo que hizo un llamado a la implementación de créditos a la palabra y créditos sin intereses, para que puedan volver a poner en funcionamiento las pequeñas y medianas empresas dedicadas a la actividad turística. ) acapulcopress.com Read the full article