#Crowdsource Testing

[freakcliff]

there's a thing about being a fan of batman comics and also a fan of persona 5 where i hate the joker (comics) so much with all of my heart that i wish him not just a painful death but worse, a fade into obscurity an erasure from the public consciousness but joker (p5) is my fucking bestie

[heartsbreaking-migrated]

my mortal enemy rn is my stat professor who would rather die than write the correct answer to a problem on our test so we know what we did wrong.

that being said, if anyone's really good at statistics, i have a problem i cannot for the life of me figure out where i went wrong on. i sent it to my dad but i'll send it to u if you wanna help 🥺

[vaishnavireportprime]

Crowdsourced Testing Market: Trends, Benefits, and Future Growth Opportunities

The Crowdsourced Testing Market, also known as crowdtesting, is rapidly becoming a preferred method for software quality assurance (QA). Leveraging a distributed group of testers, often from diverse geographic and demographic backgrounds, this approach ensures real-world testing conditions that traditional in-house teams might not replicate.

What is Crowdsourced Testing?

Crowdsourced testing involves outsourcing the QA process to a large pool of testers through an online platform. These testers identify bugs, usability issues, and functional flaws across various devices, operating systems, and networks. Companies opt for this method to ensure their digital products—such as websites, mobile apps, and software—perform well in real-world environments before going live.

Crowdsourced Testing Market Overview

The global crowdsourced testing market is growing at a rapid pace, with projections estimating it to reach USD 2.85 billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 9.6% from 2021 to 2026. Key factors driving this growth include the increasing complexity of digital products, the rising need for fast and cost-effective testing solutions, and the rapid adoption of remote work.

Key Market Drivers of Crowdsourced Testing

Growing Demand for Agile and DevOps: As companies increasingly adopt Agile and DevOps methodologies, the need for continuous testing has surged. Crowdsourced testing enables quick feedback loops, aligning well with fast-paced development cycles.

Diverse Testing Environment: One of the biggest advantages of crowdsourced testing is the ability to test across multiple devices, browsers, and regions. This ensures broader coverage than traditional in-house testing, especially for mobile and web-based applications.

Cost Efficiency: Crowdsourced testing eliminates the need to maintain large, in-house testing teams or purchase numerous devices and software for testing. Companies pay only for the services they need, leading to significant cost savings.

Global Access to Talent: By tapping into a global pool of testers, companies can ensure 24/7 testing, with access to a diverse set of skills and real-world user behaviors. This is especially valuable for global products that need testing across multiple regions.

Market Segments of Crowdsourced Testing

By Testing Type:

Functional Testing: Ensures that all features and functionalities work as expected, and that there are no bugs hindering the software's performance.

Usability Testing: Focuses on user experience, identifying how intuitive and user-friendly the product is for real-world users.

Localization Testing: Ensures that digital products are correctly adapted for different languages, cultures, and regulatory requirements.

Security Testing: Aims to find vulnerabilities and weaknesses in the software's security to prevent data breaches or cyber-attacks.

By Platform:

Web Application Testing: Crowdsourced testing is frequently used to ensure that websites and web applications perform flawlessly across different browsers, operating systems, and devices.

Mobile Application Testing: With the ever-growing number of mobile devices, crowdtesting has become vital for ensuring that mobile apps are compatible with a wide range of smartphones and tablets.

Game Testing: This niche market within crowdtesting is particularly useful for video game developers to identify bugs, performance issues, and usability problems across platforms.

By Industry:

E-commerce: Retailers rely on crowdsourced testing to ensure smooth user experiences, secure transactions, and compatibility across devices.

Healthcare: Medical software and applications require extensive testing to meet regulatory standards and ensure patient safety.

Finance: Financial institutions use crowdsourced testing to safeguard against vulnerabilities in apps handling sensitive customer data.

Gaming and Entertainment: This industry benefits from crowdsourced testing to ensure optimal performance and user engagement across diverse devices and regions.

Benefits of Crowdsourced Testing

1. Real-World Testing Scenarios

Crowdsourced testing provides access to real-world testing environments, where testers use their personal devices in everyday settings. This leads to better detection of issues that might not arise in controlled lab conditions.

2. Faster Time-to-Market

With access to a large pool of testers, crowdsourced testing allows for quicker feedback and faster bug resolution. This accelerates the testing process and helps companies meet tight deadlines.

3. Scalability

Companies can scale their testing efforts based on the needs of their project. Whether they need a small group of testers or thousands, crowdsourced testing platforms can accommodate these varying requirements.

4. Improved Test Coverage

Crowdsourced testing offers broader test coverage, as it leverages testers from different geographical locations, networks, and devices, thus covering more real-world scenarios than in-house testing.

Key Challenges in the Crowdsourced Testing Market

Despite its advantages, crowdsourced testing comes with some challenges:

Quality Control: Ensuring consistent quality and reliability in testing results can be difficult with a distributed team of testers.

Confidentiality and Security: Sharing access to pre-release products with external testers requires stringent security measures to protect intellectual property and data.

Managing Communication: Working with large groups of external testers can sometimes lead to miscommunication or a lack of coordination in the testing process.

Future Trends and Opportunities

As companies continue to shift towards digital-first strategies, the demand for crowdsourced testing is expected to grow. Key future trends in this market include:

AI-Powered Testing: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are expected to enhance crowdsourced testing by improving bug detection and automating repetitive testing tasks.

Increased Use of Remote Collaboration Tools: With remote work becoming the norm, crowdsourced testing platforms are integrating advanced collaboration tools to streamline communication between testers and developers.

Expansion in Emerging Markets: As the adoption of digital technologies grows in emerging markets, so does the demand for localized testing, creating opportunities for crowdtesting services.

Conclusion

The crowdsourced testing market is on a strong growth trajectory, driven by the increasing complexity of digital products, the rise of Agile and DevOps methodologies, and the global need for cost-effective, scalable testing solutions. As businesses strive to deliver flawless user experiences in a competitive digital landscape, crowdsourced testing will continue to play a pivotal role in ensuring software quality and performance.

Contact Us for more information on the Crowdsourced Testing Market Research 2023-2030 Forecast :

Mail your queries to - sales@reportprime.com

Or Phone Call us :

USA - +1 507 500 7209 | India - +91 750 648 0373

Browse Similar Reports :

Cooling Tower Market trends

Corporate Wellness Market Overview

Cryptocurrency Market evolve in 2030

Customer Experience Management Market trends and development in 2024.

Market Research by Report Prime.

[howdoesone]

How does one start a fundraiser to find their donor dad without it sounding like a reality TV show?

Embarking on the quest to find one’s biological father is a deeply personal and often emotional journey. For individuals conceived through sperm donation, the desire to connect with their genetic heritage can be a powerful driving force. However, the process of locating a donor dad can be complex and costly, leading some to consider fundraising as a means to support their search. While the idea…

[rohitpalan]

Forecast Unveiled: Crowdsourced Testing Market's US$ 7.09 Billion Ambition by 2033

According to a recent market analysis report by Future Market Insights, the crowdsourced testing market is experiencing rapid growth, with global sales estimated to reach US$ 2.90 billion in 2023. Projections indicate a strong CAGR of 9.3% from 2023 to 2033, suggesting that the market is poised to achieve a remarkable valuation of US$ 7.09 billion by 2033. This surge in demand highlights the increasing adoption of crowdsourced testing as an effective and efficient method for software testing across various industries.

Crowdsourced testing is pivotal in software and applications testing, utilizing an external group of testers from diverse demographics and backgrounds. This approach harnesses the crowd’s intelligence to identify bugs, streamline interactive software manufacturing, and enhance software products.

Request a Sample of this Report: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-15615

One of the significant advantages of crowdsourced testing is its scalability, benefiting both enterprises and testers. Enterprises can rely on the valuable feedback provided by external testers. This allows them to evaluate their software’s performance across various devices, operating systems, and user scenarios. Additionally, testers can participate in testing projects for multiple companies, offering flexibility and earning potential.

The rapid digital transformation has led to a surge in technological adoption worldwide. This leads to an increase in the usage of digital products and software. Consequently, it has become imperative for businesses to adopt effective approaches to test their applications strategically. This ensures an enhanced consumer experience and guards against potential threats from bugs and glitches. In response to this growing need, businesses have significantly increased their investments in end-user testing solutions, particularly in crowdsourced testing. This upswing in demand has created a thriving market for crowdsourced testing services.

In the crowdsourced testing market context, there are legitimate concerns surrounding privacy breaches and the sharing of sensitive information with external testers, especially when dealing with proprietary software. These apprehensions could potentially hinder the growth prospects of crowdsourced testing services. Additionally, a challenge faced by the industry is the scarcity of highly skilled testers in specific domains. This may lead to oversights during the testing process, potentially impacting the thorough evaluation of crucial functionalities.

Key Takeaways

The report by FMI suggests that the Asia Pacific region is poised to become a significant growth area in the forecast period. According to the report, India is expected to experience substantial growth with a CAGR of 12.3% through 2033, while China is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10.3%. These growth rates indicate promising opportunities for businesses and investors in the region.

North America is expected to retain a prominent position in the crowdsourced testing market, primarily due to government support provided to major regional players. Additionally, continuous technological advancements are further bolstering the market growth in this region. As of 2022, the United States held a substantial global market share of 18.4%, underscoring its significance in the industry’s landscape.

After North America, Europe holds a significant portion of global market shares and is expected to experience rapid growth in the forecast period. In 2022, Germany accounted for a global market value of 7.0%, indicating its notable presence in the industry. The crowdsourced testing market in Europe is thriving, driven by the presence of established players and the continuous expansion of the IT sector, which further enhances its potential for growth and innovation.

Request for Methodology: https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/request-report-methodology/rep-gb-15615

Competitive Landscape

Intense competition in the crowdsourced testing market has compelled key companies to focus on reducing manufacturing and production costs, aiming to gain a competitive edge over their rivals. Numerous companies are resorting to strategic approaches like mergers and acquisitions to broaden their consumer base and expand their businesses. The market landscape is a dynamic mix of established players currently dominating the market and several startups and emerging players making their mark. Companies are offering specialized testing services and enhancing their testing platforms to expand their global testing community.

Recent Market Developments 

June 2023: Infosys, a world leader in next-generation digital services and consulting, entered a partnership with Skillsoft, a leading provider of transformative learning experiences, aiming to revamp education and learning for middle school students in India. Infosys Springboard intends to give students access to Skillsoft learning content designed to build technology and business.

June 2023: Cigniti Technologies, a global leader in AI and IP-led Digital Assurance and Digital Services, collaborated with Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology (MGIT), an educational institute based out of Hyderabad, with an aim to launch an innovative training program to bridge the gap between academia and industry and empower future IT Professionals.

Key Segments Covered in Crowdsourced Testing Industry Survey

Crowdsourced Testing Market by Testing Type:

Performance Testing

Functionality Testing

Usability Testing

Localization Testing

Security Testing

Others

Crowdsourced Testing Market by Platform:

Website Testing

Mobile Testing

Others

Crowdsourced Testing Market by Organization Size:

Large Enterprises

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises

Crowdsourced Testing Market by Vertical:

Retail

BFSI

IT and Telecom

Healthcare and Life Sciences

Media and Entertainment

Others

Crowdsourced Testing Market by Region:

North America Crowdsourced Testing Market

Latin America Crowdsourced Testing Market

Europe Crowdsourced Testing Market

South Asia Crowdsourced Testing Market

East Asia Crowdsourced Testing Market

Oceania Crowdsourced Testing Market

Middle East & Africa Crowdsourced Testing Market

[webomates]

Overcome the Challenges of Crowdsourced Testing

Crowdsourced testing is becoming popular in the industry, and it is a fairly new trend in the software engineering community. In crowdsourced testing, crowd-users are rewarded to perform testing tasks and submit their results, and because crowd-users are often paid per task, there is a financial incentive to complete the tasks rapidly. These submissions of the tasks are composed of answers in simple language with relevant screenshots.

Crowdsourced testing enables organizations of any size to access the power of curated or non-curated crowd-users to strengthen the test coverage especially across multiple geographies who have access to virtually unlimited devices at any time. It can be scaled up or down at a moment’s notice, at a very low cost. This might be otherwise impossible to mobilize within an in-house test effort. To learn more about the value of adding crowdsourcing to your testing strategy read this article. However, there are a lot of challenges with Crowdsourced testing. Let’s start looking at the disadvantages involved with Crowdsourced testing.

Challenge: Confidentiality

Creating and maintaining confidentiality and reliability is one of the most critical challenges that an organization faces while working with Crowdsourced testing. It is important not to share or expose any information with crowd-testers which is confidential to the product owners.

How does Webomates handle it?

Webomates carefully assesses each challenge and creates bespoke solutions like custom plugins, secured virtual machines with continuous monitoring of activities performed by the crowd-users, HTTP proxy, etc for facilitating testing on the system under test.

Challenge: Effective Communication

Communication is another challenge while working with crowd-users. As Crowdsourced testing is carried out by anyone across the world, the person may not be immediately available for communication and clarification.

How does Webomates handle it?

Webomates overcame this challenge firstly by providing very high quality written test cases in a simple natural language. Each test case is divided into multiple validation points to which crowd-users provide answers.

Additionally, Webomates communicates with workers using multiple forms like email, chat messenger, discussion forums, etc to resolve any concern faced by the crowd-users. Conducting a regular Open Session using Video Conferencing tools is also an effective way to resolve the concerns which aren’t possible by other means of communication. Finally, prompt reply to the users’ queries is critical.

Challenge: Quality of Execution

Another major issue that arises is ensuring the quality of testing or the quality of defects raised. Quality of submission is another disadvantage generally faced with Crowdsourced testing. This becomes even more challenging when working with non-curated users.

How Webomates handles it?

Webomates overcame this challenge by creating Qualification Tests and by providing training to the users on complex scenarios like API testing and judging their understanding and knowledge with Qualification Tests. This way we converted non-curated users to semi-curated users.

It’s a challenge to manage crowd-users across the globe as they work in different time zones. Webomates always notifies the users whenever tasks are available to work. It is also important to publish tasks at the scheduled time and day of the week, making habitual for crowd-users when the tasks will be available. With regular work, they also become familiar with the application under test. It is also essential to provide feedback for each task.

Challenge: Ability to scale up

Ability to scale up on demand is another challenge with crowd-users. Crowd-users are spread across the globe and available to work in different time zones. Whether they have the right device on test cases that are supposed to be executed and whether they feel encouraged to work on a daily basis when they are not obliged to? So their availability to perform time-boxed testing can be a challenge.

How Webomates handles it?

Webomates does profiling of crowd-users on a regular basis to determine their QA skills, their availability according to the time zones they belong to and devices on which they can execute the test cases.

Webomates created four different pools of crowd-users on their ability to execute test cases. The performance of crowd-users is measured on multiple criteria like quality of submission (i.e. accuracy of the test cases submitted), the speed with which test cases are executed, the number of test cases executed, etc. The user is moved successively to a higher level when there is a significant improvement in his performance.

All these factors help Webomates to maintain a talent pool of crowd-users community which can scale-up quickly to execute large numbers of test cases.

Conclusion

Crowdsourced testing can give any organization a new software testing technique for carrying out feature regression testing or exploratory testing. However, setting up and running a crowdsourcing platform can face challenges like confidentiality, effective communication, scaling and quality of execution.

At Webomates, we refine our Crowdsource testing each day to continually improve our results with techniques ranging from using algorithms to identify which test case to crowdsource to maintaining the high quality of execution and effective communication with crowd-users while respecting the customer’s confidentiality. All these factors together help us to scale and provide speed to test the customer’s application.

If you would like to see the Webomates platform in action you can always sign up for a free trial. Or if you would like to learn more about Webomates CQ click on the link or schedule a call.

[neetihtfmi]

Crowdsourced Testing Market Definition & Trend, Driver, Opportunity bullet point & Current, Forecast market size

The crowdsourced testing market refers to a type of software testing in which a large community of testers, often from diverse backgrounds and locations, is leveraged to test software applications. Crowdsourced testing is typically facilitated through online platforms or companies that connect organizations in need of testing with a pool of testers.

In this model, companies or developers submit their software applications to the crowdsourcing platform, specifying the types of tests they want to be conducted and any specific requirements. The platform then distributes the testing tasks to the community of testers, who perform the tests and provide feedback, bug reports, and other relevant information.https://www.htfmarketintelligence.com/report/global-crowdsourced-testing-market

[literaryvein-reblogs]

Hey do you give advice for writing romantic relationships between characters? If so, any tips on how to write a organic transition from friendship to romance. Any help would be appreciated thank you in advance:)

Writing Notes: Friends-to-Lovers

Two characters have maintained a relationship long enough to grow it from acquaintances to friendship. They have things in common. They respect each other. Consider…

Why are they only getting together now? Are they settling? Is it a timing thing? These have to be the two least romantic options in the history of romance.

What could be better than having someone know you for exactly who you are and deciding you’re irresistible? There is actually an answer to this, and it’s this: being able to trust your heart to someone who has already proven they’re worthy of it.

With enemies-to-lovers, the characters start out not liking each other. In friends-to-lovers, it’s a given that the reverse is true.

However, in the latter, it may not be enough for the love interest to be just likeable.

If your story is going to document someone’s exit from the friend zone, they also need to be desirable.

Consider some sex appeal here. You don’t want your readers picturing little Johnny or Jenny from next door who they always knew they should like. You want them picturing the person they thought they couldn’t like.

Example: Hugh Jackman’s playboy character in Someone Like You. While Ashley Judd was viewing him as undateable, the audience had time to properly fall in love with him. We knew we could trust him long before she did, and we were thrilled when her eyes were finally opened to his good qualities.

Why couldn’t one friend like the other before, but they can like them now?

With enemies-to-lovers, there are two things that need to happen. There’s the event that causes them to be at odds, and then there’s something that brings them together.

With friends-to-lovers, the transition can begin with a single change.

All you need is a reason for one person to see the other through new eyes.

Is one of them suddenly single? Did one of them dive into a pond Colin-Firth-Darcy-style, emerging with their shirt see-through and clinging to their unexpectedly well-defined abs? Did one-too-many tequilas work their magic?

It may be much easier to turn friends into lovers you can believe in and root for than it is for two characters who have been treating each other poorly.

All of our friends have characteristics that initially attracted us to them. As writers, all we have to do is deepen that attraction.

The stakes must be set.

With enemies-to-lovers, this is usually built into the story. Whatever has put the characters at odds can generally be relied on to test the relationship. But what about friends?

How do we raise their stakes? It can, of course, be built into the story just like with an enemies-to-lovers storyline.

But the cool thing about friends-to-lovers is that we have their entire history to mine from as well.

We also have a shared social circle to work with.

The stakes for friends-to-lovers feel more realistic and pressing.

A sexy fling with an enemy can be laughed off the next day, but a failed romance with a close friend can change the landscape of your life.

D.A. Stinson et al. (2022) examined how romance develops, as well as how studies have covered the progression in a piece entitled “The Friends-to-Lovers Pathway to Romance.”

They begin by recognizing that although there are multiple pathways to romance, the science of relationship study does not reflect this variety; instead focusing primarily on romance that builds between strangers as opposed to friends. They note that this type of concentration might make sense if friends-first romances were atypical or unfavorable, but note that their research reveals the opposite.

Conducting a meta-analysis of seven samples of university students and crowdsourced adults, Stinson et al. found that two-thirds described being friends first, which was also the preferred method of initiation among university students. Taken together, their studies affirm that although overlooked by relationship science to some extent, being friends before the initiation of a romantic relationship is not only prevalent, but preferred.

Pathway From Platonic to Romantic

Stinson et al. note that relationship scientists recognize at least 2 kinds of intimacy.

One is friendship-based,defined as “a cognitive and emotional experience comprising psychological interdependence, warmth, and understanding, related to the companionate love that nurtures long-term intimate bonds.”

The other is passion-based intimacy, defined as “a primarily emotional experience comprising romance and positive arousal, related to the passionate love that typifies novel, and often sexual, relationships.”

Stinson et al. also note that the dominant dating script proposes men’s passion as the sensation that sparks initial interaction between potential paramours, after which time passion-based intimacy and friendship-based intimacy develop concurrently. But does this reflect reality? Apparently, the answer is a matter of perspective and perception—of the individuals involved, as well as interested observers.

Romantic Rumors

Many cross-friendships spark more than romance; they spark rumors. Researchers have found that celebrity websites often promote the idea that men and women cannot be “just friends.” Andrea McDonnell and Clare M. Mehta (2016) explored this issue in a piece entitled “We Could Never Be Friends: Representing Cross-Sex Friendship on Celebrity Gossip Web Sites.” They note that although psychological scholarship is mixed on the topic of cross-sex friendship, media representations often reflect the homosocial norm, which asserts a preference to spend time with members of one’s same sex, implying that cross-sex relationships are necessarily sexual in nature.

Regardless of individual views on the homosocial norm, many employees can relate to McDonnell and Mehta’s observation that cross-sex friendships can spark suspicion and scrutiny by others who assume such relationships are romantic or sexual. This is true even in a day and age where they are not only common in general, but commonplace in the workplace.

For coworkers, neighbors, or “just” friends who find themselves wondering if there might be the potential to move a relationship to the next level, slow and steady positive development of trust and common interests often evolve not just in the presence of friends and family, colleagues and coworkers, but with their full endorsement. As demonstrated by many couples who have successfully navigated this “dateless” path down the aisle to the altar, easy, comfortable, relationships often develop into healthy romantic, lifelong partnerships of love and respect.

Sources: 1 2 3 ⚜ More: Notes & References ⚜ Writing Resources PDFs

Hope this helps with your writing :)

[reasonsforhope]

"Is social media designed to reward people for acting badly?

The answer is clearly yes, given that the reward structure on social media platforms relies on popularity, as indicated by the number of responses – likes and comments – a post receives from other users. Black-box algorithms then further amplify the spread of posts that have attracted attention.

Sharing widely read content, by itself, isn’t a problem. But it becomes a problem when attention-getting, controversial content is prioritized by design. Given the design of social media sites, users form habits to automatically share the most engaging information regardless of its accuracy and potential harm. Offensive statements, attacks on out groups and false news are amplified, and misinformation often spreads further and faster than the truth.

We are two social psychologists and a marketing scholar. Our research, presented at the 2023 Nobel Prize Summit, shows that social media actually has the ability to create user habits to share high-quality content. After a few tweaks to the reward structure of social media platforms, users begin to share information that is accurate and fact-based...

Re-targeting rewards

To investigate the effect of a new reward structure, we gave financial rewards to some users for sharing accurate content and not sharing misinformation. These financial rewards simulated the positive social feedback, such as likes, that users typically receive when they share content on platforms. In essence, we created a new reward structure based on accuracy instead of attention.

As on popular social media platforms, participants in our research learned what got rewarded by sharing information and observing the outcome, without being explicitly informed of the rewards beforehand. This means that the intervention did not change the users’ goals, just their online experiences. After the change in reward structure, participants shared significantly more content that was accurate. More remarkably, users continued to share accurate content even after we removed rewards for accuracy in a subsequent round of testing. These results show that users can be given incentives to share accurate information as a matter of habit.

A different group of users received rewards for sharing misinformation and for not sharing accurate content. Surprisingly, their sharing most resembled that of users who shared news as they normally would, without any financial reward. The striking similarity between these groups reveals that social media platforms encourage users to share attention-getting content that engages others at the expense of accuracy and safety...

Doing right and doing well

Our approach, using the existing rewards on social media to create incentives for accuracy, tackles misinformation spread without significantly disrupting the sites’ business model. This has the additional advantage of altering rewards instead of introducing content restrictions, which are often controversial and costly in financial and human terms.

Implementing our proposed reward system for news sharing carries minimal costs and can be easily integrated into existing platforms. The key idea is to provide users with rewards in the form of social recognition when they share accurate news content. This can be achieved by introducing response buttons to indicate trust and accuracy. By incorporating social recognition for accurate content, algorithms that amplify popular content can leverage crowdsourcing to identify and amplify truthful information.

Both sides of the political aisle now agree that social media has challenges, and our data pinpoints the root of the problem: the design of social media platforms."

And here's the video of one of the scientsts presenting this research at the Nobel Prize Summit!

-Article via The Conversation, August 1, 2023. Video via the Nobel Prize's official Youtube channel, Nobel Prize, posted May 31, 2023.

[antiadvil]

early tit shows request

I already posted this in the community tab but wanted to make a separate post so it can be shared more widely.

TLDR I’m very photosensitive and have tit tickets for November 3rd in Chicago. I would like to compile a list of the flash effects in the show and when they are before I go, so I can know when to look away. If anyone else would find this useful, I can share the list publicly. I'll put the rest under a cut because it's very long and I want any discussion via reblog chain to be legible:

why i need help:

As some of you may know because I bitch about constantly, I have chronic migraine, and one of my symptoms is photophobia that ranges from moderate to severe Literally All Of The Time. On a good day I’m able to hang out in a dim room wearing my tinted glasses and experience no light related pain but even on my best migraine days I still find very bright, flashing, or flickering lights to be very painful to look at or generally exist around. I bought a tit ticket fully knowing there would likely be flash effects in it because WAD did, many of their videos do, ii and tatinof probably did, I don’t remember, and literally every stage production I have been to in the past year did, except for an orchestra, if that counts as a stage production 😂. I literally would not be able to leave my apartment if I avoided everything that triggers my photophobia considering the Literal Sun is one of the biggest offenders so I am really not looking for people to tell me to just not go or whatever. Obviously I hope that my migraine resolves by the time my show comes around (like at least breaking down into individual episodes instead of one incredibly long migraine would be nice), and it’s possible it will, since I haven’t actually gotten to try the most promising treatments yet bc insurance bullshit, but I expect to still be dealing with this two months from now.

how you can help:

So, it would be really helpful if anyone was able to tell me about the flash effects in the show before I go. Ideally, I would like to know how many there are, how extreme they are, how long they last, and MOST ideally, approximately when in the show they happen so I can cover my eyes and look away beforehand (I’m thinking, like, “after they do abc they flash the lights,” not timestamps, since I think that would be much easier for everyone involved to remember. I know this will probably involve spoilers, I don’t mind, I’m currently planning to look at spoilers for the show). I know this is not something people with normal eyes/brains/optic nerves normally remember after shows (even my closest friends who are genuinely trying have failed to warn me about flash effects before) but I am hoping through the power of crowdsourcing i can put together a semi-complete guide to When To Look Away At Tit For Photophobic people. I can share that doc if there’s any interest in it and anyone who is able to “test drive” the document before my show would be very helpful. I’m also willing to keep making changes to the document after my show, if that’s something people would find helpful. If it is though I would really appreciate hearing from you- even if it's just an anon or something, because I'm not going to do extra work if I don't think it will reach anyone who needs it. I'm sure I'm not the only person who's planning to go to tit and just suffer through any flash effects, but I don't know if this post/the document I make will reach any of them (does anyone know if there's an accessibility/disability community on phan twitter??). My tentative plan is to share the document regardless, since it doesn't take much extra work from me, but if this is something that would benefit you please reach out so we can make sure it benefits you too.

a hopefully helpful guide to flash effects:

Another challenge is, quite frankly, most people are very bad at even noticing flash effects if they’re not photosensitive. I get it, as a newly photosensitive person I was genuinely confused about why I left across the spiderverse with such a bad headache, because nothing in it looked like a “flash effect” to me. Some things that have triggered my photophobia before that people may not think of as “flash” effects include: the snow effect in stardew valley, candles (flames in general create a very flickery light), glitch/static editing effects, the sort of stuttery/laggy way video games look when your graphics card is bad, and video that flips through photographs/backgrounds very quickly (this is worse the more different the colors/etc in the photos/backgrounds are from each other but even if it’s done in a more stopmotion kind of way it still bugs me at low FPS. It’s like the video game thing, I’m not sure if there’s an actual word for that). Another thing that commonly bothers people (personally it doesn’t hurt much though it can make me a bit motion sick) is sort of swirly “hypnotizing” gifs.

From the set photos, I think any flash effects would most likely come from the light/rope/wire things, those just look perfect for some kind of sparking/lightning effect which I imagine would be very obvious and easy to spot. The video screens could probably also be a problem but if they’re all at standard screen brightness, unless they all start being flashy at the same time, they’re a much smaller portion of the audience’s field of vision so I don’t think they would be as problematic (though I would still like to know about them!). My worst fear is that they’re playing something really staticky for the entire show, though I hope that at my distance from the stage, the static would be small enough to just kind of blend into gray and not bother me much.

in conclusion:

Yes, this could all be solved if people stopped putting so many fucking flash effects in their shows. I am begging for the entire world to realize that nine times out of ten they are Completely Not Worth It and just putting a “some flash effects may not be suitable for photosensitive viewers!!!” warning on every piece of media ever created does not make their media accessible (hey Netflix! Wanna give me a timestamp to skip or am I just expected to never watch Stranger Things?). But here we are.

[collegetennisoriginstory]

Public release of Update #9

Sneak Peak A

The PUBLIC RELEASE of the Empire State singles match is available for everyone! I'm so excited for you guys to read it. I know it's been a while, but we are ~back~!!

Un-beta-tested at the moment, but do let me know if you spot any errors or bugs AND/OR have feedback!

Wordcount:

54k with code

Features:

Added some extra MC customization options: e.g. choose ethnicity/race, options to play as cis/trans-gender, second language.

Some minor edits to the earlier chapters for flow.

Fleshed out the ‘lore’/world of college tennis, including the various colleges in Cargill’s conference.

Singles match against ESU.

Immediate reaction after the match (e.g. run toward & hug Rayyan/Tobin/Sam/G, plus some kisses for... 2 of them)

Here's the  Crowdsourced playlists to accompany your playthrough (or to add to if you feel inspired), and here's my ko-fi if you'd like to buy me a coffee! :)

Update #9 Sneak Peak B:

This was originally planned to go out today as well for ko-fi supporters, but I need about a day or two more time. I'll update you guy again when it's done!! Sorry for the slight delay, I need to finish up some scenes!

[inbabylontheywept]

Following back on the recent fusionposting to run a very technically unqualified intuition I have by you

When talking about baseload power generation, the conversation inevitably turns to nuclear, with a common narrative that certain countries are irrationally afraid of nuclear for not copying the successful policies of their neighbours (usually it's about Germany or Austria needing to emulate France)

What I've wanted to run by you is this viewpoint I've had for a while - that the economics of nuclear power are different from other sources, and that that may better explain the choices of policymakers:

The procurement of nuclear power seems much closer to military procurement in my eyes, with costs stemming from the management of standards, supply chains being inflexible and project/nation-dependent, and the costs of maintaining regional expertise overshadowing the costs that build physical capital.

Can you confirm/disconfirm any of these impressions?

I'm only slightly more qualified than you, unfortunately. I haven't work in the nuclear power sector. I have coworkers that have, and their stories do seem to check out with your descriptions.

Like, in a military style contract, parts might cost 4 times as much as a civilian part, because the military tests the parts much, much more stringently. You don't test the screws at home depot to make sure they match the metal composition, or that their sheer strength matches X, or on and on. You have a baseline level of trust that comes from market forces. But military supplies don't have market forces to work with - there isn't exactly a market for, say, F-35s. So they have to try and catch this manually instead of via crowdsourcing, and the results are painful.

That's military procurement, and I work with that enough to know why it exists. Even if it hurts.

Now, that sound very similar to nuclear power, which also analyzes everything to the T because the cost of failure is so ridiculously high. The coworker I mentioned before that worked for reactor said her first year learn-the-ropes project was doing a report on the safety consequences of swapping the lights from fluorescent to LED in the main office buildings. It was a 200+ page thing going over how the new lights would affect the backup power duration stats, hazards of the new lights vs the old ones (LEDs are less tolereant of undervoltage than fluorescents), things like that. I would imagine that in that case, they probably spent at least 4 or 5 times as much analyzing the impact of the lighting than they actually spent on the lighting.

This drives efficiency oriented people kind of crazy, but the whole point of these systems is not to be efficient. It is to be extremely resistant to failure. Ludicrously, insanely, painfully resistant. Because in the military case, a bad batch of bolts normally worth $40 could make a $35 million plane crash, and in the nuclear case, a meltdown could literally cause trillions of dollars of damage. The Fukushima meltdown is estimated to have caused $200 billion worth of damage, and it was not even close to a worst case scenario.

Anyway, I'm rambling a little, but your intuition seems good to me. I love nuclear power, but people suggesting that we "slash all the red tape around it" scare the shit out of me. They have no idea what they're fucking with, and if we're all very, very lucky, they never will.

[thegreenleavesofspring]

Actually you know what I'm gonna write this story but I'm gonna crowdsource it this time.

The stage: Earth at some unspecified point in the future when there is space travel, a one world order, a population decimation, and martial law. A war is ongoing with a planet full of human-passing aliens, who wish to commit a total genocide on Earth to acquire the planet for the use of their own overpopulation.

The scene: five(ish, maybe three, something like that,) years previously, one of said aliens, a spy, came to Earth, and married a human woman for cover. He has recently been discovered and incarcerated and is to be executed today.

The dilemma: I need him to escape as the very first scene. His wife is the guard during his execution, presumably as a test of her loyalty to the military order. Now:

*This is a double cross on the part of the military and she escapes with him when they start trying to kill her too

**This was my initial teenage explanation, and it's kind of a neat one, but it has implications that I never explored further and ultimately have decided to scrap that angle entirely.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Peter Clarke

Published: Jun 20, 2024

Today, the governor of Louisiana signed a law requiring classrooms in the state to display the Ten Commandments. According to the Republican governor, Jeff Landry, “If you want to respect the rule of law, you gotta start from the original law given which was Moses. … He got his commandments from God.”

Apparently, Governor Landry never bothered to learn that the scholarly consensus is that Moses, if he existed at all, was “largely mythical.” The governor also apparently never reflected on the fact that America is founded on the separation of church and state. The ACLU, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, and others have already come out with a statement, observing that the new law results in “unconstitutional religious coercion of students.” The statement adds, “Politicians have no business imposing their preferred religious doctrine on students and families in public schools.”

Furthermore, Governor Landry apparently never took a moment to actually read the Ten Commandments. Because if he had, he may have noticed that they’re utterly unimpressive as far as moral commandments go. As Sam Harris wrote in Letter to a Christian Nation:

“If you think that it would be impossible to improve upon the Ten Commandments as a statement of morality, you really owe it to yourself to read some other scriptures. Once again, we need look no further than the Jains: Mahavira, the Jain patriarch, surpassed the morality of the Bible with a single sentence: ‘Do not injure, abuse, oppress, enslave, insult, torment, torture, or kill any creature or living being.’ Imagine how different our world might be if the Bible contained this as its central precept. Christians have abused, oppressed, enslaved, insulted, tormented, tortured, and killed people in the name of God for centuries, on the basis of a theologically defensible reading of the Bible.”

In fact, you don’t even have to look at other religious groups to find improvements to the Ten Commandments. There are countless secular alternatives to the Ten Commandments, any one of which would be more appropriate for the classroom.

Consider the Ten Commandments by blogger Adam Lee, which Richard Dawkins included in his book The God Delusion:

Do not do to others what you would not want them to do to you.

In all things, strive to cause no harm.

Treat your fellow human beings, your fellow living things, and the world in general with love, honesty, faithfulness and respect.

Do not overlook evil or shrink from administering justice, but always be ready to forgive wrongdoing freely admitted and honestly regretted.

Live life with a sense of joy and wonder.

Always seek to be learning something new.

Test all things; always check your ideas against the facts, and be ready to discard even a cherished belief if it does not conform to them.

Never seek to censor or cut yourself off from dissent; always respect the right of others to disagree with you.

Form independent opinions on the basis of your own reason and experience; do not allow yourself to be led blindly by others.

Question everything.

Or consider the crowdsourced Atheists’ New Ten Commandments from the 2015 Rethink Prize:

Be open-minded and be willing to alter your beliefs with new evidence.

Strive to understand what is most likely to be true, not to believe what you wish to be true.

The scientific method is the most reliable way of understanding the natural world.

Every person has the right to control of their body.

God is not necessary to be a good person or to live a full and meaningful life.

Be mindful of the consequences of all your actions and recognize that you must take responsibility for them.

Treat others as you would want them to treat you, and can reasonably expect them to want to be treated. Think about their perspective.

We have the responsibility to consider others, including future generations.

There is no one right way to live.

Leave the world a better place than you found it.

Or even consider the Seven Tenets from The Satanic Temple:

One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.

The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.

One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.

The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one’s own.

Beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one’s beliefs.

People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one’s best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.

Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.

Finally, here’s ChatGPT, in response to the prompt, “Write 10 original secular commandments that are an improvement to the 10 commandments in the bible”:

Value and Respect All Human Life: Recognize and uphold the dignity, rights, and worth of every individual, regardless of their background or beliefs.

Act with Compassion and Kindness: Treat others with empathy, understanding, and kindness, striving to alleviate suffering and promote happiness.

Seek and Promote Truth: Commit to the pursuit of knowledge and truth, encouraging critical thinking, honesty, and transparency in all interactions.

Protect and Preserve the Environment: Take responsibility for the well-being of our planet, ensuring sustainable practices and the protection of natural resources for future generations.

Support Equality and Justice: Advocate for fair treatment and equal opportunities for all, working to eliminate discrimination, prejudice, and injustice in society.

Respect Personal Autonomy: Honor the right of individuals to make their own choices and live their lives according to their values and beliefs, as long as they do not harm others.

Cultivate Peace and Non-Violence: Strive to resolve conflicts through dialogue, understanding, and non-violent means, promoting peaceful coexistence.

Encourage Community and Solidarity: Foster a sense of community and mutual support, working together to address common challenges and enhance collective well-being.

Pursue Lifelong Learning and Growth: Embrace continuous personal development and education, seeking to improve oneself and contribute positively to society.

Practice Gratitude and Humility: Recognize and appreciate the contributions and perspectives of others, remaining humble and open to learning from diverse experiences and viewpoints.

Why not put that in Louisiana classrooms, governor?

Oh…right. Because you don’t actually care about promoting ethical behavior that would improve the wellbeing of your community. You just care about virtue signaling to your mythical deity from the Bronze Age.