#Black Politicians

[blackstar1887]

Are Black Politicians useless?

[yourdailyqueer]

Dani Balbi

Gender: Transgender woman

Sexuality: Queer

DOB: 3 April 1989 

Ethnicity: Afro Brazilian

Occupation: Politician (Communist Party of Brazil), professor, screenwriter, activist

Note 1: First transgender parliamentarian in the Rio de Janeiro state's legislative assembly and first transgender person to be awarded a doctorate.

Note 2: On 28 June 2023, International LGBTQIA+ Pride Day, the state assembly building was lit with the Rainbow Flag on her initiative.

[engie-ivy]

@wolfstarmicrofic 11th: Ardent

199 words

“ ‘Remus Lupin has no ill-intentions, he's just dumb and naïeve, which you can't blame him for, considering his menial upbringing’. ” Mary lowers the newspaper with Orion Black's latest column and shakes her head. “Good lord. I mean, I know Orion Black ardently opposes every politician who tries to take power away from him and his rich friends, but when it comes to Remus, I've always gotten the sense that it's somehow… extra personal.”

“That's because he knows I mean it,” Remus says, as he looks up from the speech he's writing. “He knows I'm not going to stop before the poor have as many rights and opportunities as the rich. He knows I'm coming for him and that I can't be bought.” Remus is standing now and clenching one fist. “Throwing some money at it won't save him this time. I have a vision and mission, and he is right to fear me!”

Mary stairs at him in admiration, feeling proud to be a member of his campaign team.

Lily, however, raises an eyebrow and gives Remus a pointed look.

“Oh,” Remus says, smiling sheepishly and scratching the back of his head. “Right. And I'm also shagging his son.”

[sbd-laytall]

Nightwing definitely be speaking truths here.

Black Canary (1993) #10

[scopophilic1997]

scopOphilic_micromessaging_1133 - scopOphilic1997 presents a new micro-messaging series: small, subtle, and often unintentional messages we send and receive verbally and non-verbally.

PLEASE VOTE FOR KAMALA HARRIS & BE SURE TO VOTE BLUE UP & DOWN THE BALLOT.

The Times They Are A Changin'!

[drakaripykiros130ac]

One thing I enjoy in this whole story is how Otto and Alicent Hightower have somehow convinced themselves that they speak for the entire Realm.

They don’t call a Great Council after King Viserys dies to settle the succession, they don’t let people choose between Rhaenyra and Aegon, they keep King Viserys’ death a secret and plot with the Council behind closed doors.

And then they claim to speak for the Realm when they say things like: “The Realm will not accept her [Rhaenyra]”.

Is that right? And how could your conniving, backstabbing ass know that, Ser Otto? Did you run a survey during the years you were Hand? Did you create polls? Anything like that?

[Don’t even get me started on Alicent. In real life, a woman like her (upstart, conniving, jealous and cruel bitch who steals her stepdaughter’s inheritance immediately after her father’s death), would never receive any kind of support from anyone].

All I can remember is Aegon being crowned by his mommy, granddaddy and his mommy’s lap dog/wannabe lover in the Dragonpit, with hundreds of smallfolk who were forced to attend this farce of a coronation and swear obeisance to a false king under penalty of death (the death of Lord Lyman Beesbury was proof enough that the Greens were going to execute anyone who did not comply with their treasonous actions).

And despite everything, Rhaenyra ends up having the majority Houses on her side (53) and she controls the largest territories of the Realm (the North, the Vale and the Riverlands).

As a whole, Rhaenyra has: the North, the Vale, the Riverlands, the Iron Islands, the Crownlands, and half the Reach.

Meanwhile, Aegon only has the Stormlands, the Westerlands and half the Reach.

Otto and Alicent are either living in absolute denial and prefer to lie to themselves and others or they are truly out of their minds.

Understand this: 3/4 of Westeros preferred to go to war for a woman, rather than accept the man already sitting the throne.

Now, tell me again, what were you saying about the Realm?

[penwrythe]

What's stopping the possibility of a ceasefire is pretty simple. Hamas is holding 239 Israeli civilians hostage including children and the elderly. What's happening in Palestine is a travesty and horrendous. But Israel can't initiate a ceasefire from the position they're in, so we need to be agitating for Hamas to release the hostages and call for a ceasefire instead.

NO GENOCIDE IS JUSTIFIABLE

HOW DOES THE KILLING OF INNOCENT PEOPLE ON THIS EXTREME LEVEL FORCE HAMAS TO RETURN HOSTAGES??

ISRAEL'S BOMBARDMENT AND INDISCRIMINATE SHOOTING IN GAZA THREATEN EVERYONE THERE INCLUDING DOCTORS JOURNALISTS CHILDREN ENTIRE FAMILIES AND THE HOSTAGES

EVERYONE IS TARGETED

YOU HAVE HOSPITALS BOMBED HOW ANY OF THIS IS JUSTIFIED

@sarroora @fairuzfan @palipunk @wearenotjustnumbers2

You know more about this than I do.

[blackqueernotables]

Erika Hilton: the first trans woman elected to the city council in São Paulo.

[feralfaefantasygay]

"I only watch shows for the plots"

📣 The Plots

The Plots are just 👩‍🍳💋

[tani-b-art]

When representation is just an illusion.

It isn’t anything new to see that a Black face (or a person of color) in high places doesn’t always mean things will instantly be better. Not with centuries and decades of benign neglect from prior years and administrations before that have trickle down effect in perpetual cycle. And issues cannot be fixed with just one person or just within a term or with just one admin in office. We know that.

We know the history of this country (don’t have to go thru racism 101+the party ideology switch). We know that often times when we do get individuals in positions of authority that can make decisions that do represent you, it isn’t a 100% problem solver. But getting people in positions that do represent you at times actually does help to alleviate problems and makes a difference. Should.

With that being said, this is why we push to elect people in offices that share experiences, culture and community with us because they often better understand us. Simply put: that’s why we vote for the Black candidate. That’s why we admonish one another as Black people to get a Black doctor, or to get a Black therapist or to make sure, if we really can, to send our kids to schools with Black teachers to be taught by Black teachers and to have Black police officers that have a good relationship with our communities. That’s why we look to each other to be that representation. Shared experiences make for better understanding. It should work out that way. We’ll actually get results in our favor because of the shared background and that politician understands and has empathy and will use their power for our betterment. We understand that it unfortunately doesn’t always work out this way.

However, when we don’t have those in positions that represent us and reflect us, we do run into opposition and racism and bias and prejudice and discrimination that is detrimental and at times fatal to us because they don’t understand us. And the ugly side to this is that sometimes, even with those people in these positions that look like us, they can operate in the same way as those who don’t share anything with us. The “skin folk ain’t kinfolk”.

Now, it’s even deeper. It’s coming down to specific Black lineage based faces in high places. Because just Black in general is not holding weight.

The Democratic Party isn’t getting this.

We’ve had long periods of time where city and higher officials were never Black and there was absolute neglect. Not only neglect but also total gutting of what progress was made by Black Americans. On local levels to larger.

So, many of us have voted with all this in mind. Policies and representation matters. We haven’t gotten anything from non-Black politicians—at one point, Black people were outright not allowed to even participate in any civic opportunities to run for these positions.

We know Trump won’t do anything specifically for Black Americans. We know as a collective, one party won’t do for us at all. We know that. And that’s why we’ve turned to the other party knowing at least things will be opposite. Knowing that at least this party has more people who look like us. More often in the Democratic Party, they will do for us.

Now, that we’re allowed to also be active in civic duties with being political figures and also as civilians, we can vote, all the representation is supposed to matter.

At least we thought.

We thought 8 years of our first President that was Black would completely usher in change in our benefit! We had centuries of never having someone who wasn’t white …so yeah, finally somebody is elected that is Black that will actually do for us because he is one of us.

And.that.never.happened.

Barack Obama’s paternalistic display with Black men the other day, the overseer-like mentality — nothing new. The party that we’ve collectively supported for 6 decades (you can’t get more party loyalty from a group more than us) keeps bringing out Obama to be this sort of proverbial disciplinarian to condemn us to cycle this party loyalty. And it doesn’t work anymore. It won’t any longer. Maybe it held some weight in the last cycle. Maybe it still will. But if they keep practicing this to reach any of us they lost, best of luck with that. And if he calls one more fictional Black man Pookie…

But, it’s a new era of that possibly not working anymore. Or not being impactful. I mean it’s never been the smart thing to do ever. But public chastising is not going to recover the waning votes. The party may never get it back.

The scolding strategy…that’s no way ever to sway your constituents who are possibly still indecisive. Reprimanding and shaming is the perfect plan to further gulf anyone. To add, those same Black men were probably just around early teenage yrs back in 2010 and when Obama said things like “I can't pass laws that say I'm just helping black folks. I'm the president of the United States” in regards to being asked what can he do about the high Black unemployment rate, they probably heard those conversations their parents had about those very remarks and as grown men, they remember that.

Or when asked about reparations:

The same can be said for Harris when she was a Senator back in 2019 when asked about reparations:

[how much lift Black folk gotta be a part of?! programs galore and zero policy. then when anything is even mentioned for Black folk, the and others get slipped in]

Both of the Presidential hopefuls (at the time, Obama) share the same views on reparations for Black Americans. Just about verbatim too. The only two non-white true hopefuls felt/feel the same way. We remembered. In Obama’s case, we still did not let that deter us from voting for him to a second term. However, it just may not be Harris’ case altogether. Even if it was simply a play on “yes, I’ll support reparations” pre getting elected but won’t actually support it when in office. The thing is they both outright rejected reparative financial justice for us at every turn.

I also won’t go into Obama trying to make comparisons of Harris’ background to ours. But I’ll say this — Kamala Harris does not represent my Black Indigenous American mother or my Black Indigenous American aunties. She’s white Indian by her mother and has Jamaican roots from her father based on what she’s said (nationality does not equal a person’s race—so simply saying a Jamaican father does not mean Black. Jamaican is a nationality only). My momma and aunties ain’t ever put no darn collard greens in a bathtub to clean them! Harris and I don’t share the same background and that’s okay. We have an upbringing and relationship with this country that is verrry much different from Harris. My mom has never said “20 acres and a mule” because she’s well aware of the fight our ancestors fought for which was 40 acres and a mule. Going to HBCUs do not equate to Blackness. Sharing Black skin alone doesn’t mean we share lineage either (Obama is Black yes but not Black Indigenous American, his father was a Black Kenyan and he had a white American mother). Another topic. All of this is Neither here nor there. To put out that it’s sexism in play too is just low-bar but I digress.

Obama also doesn’t understand nor does the Democratic Party understand that sending him out to chastise Black people post his presidency is not a good plan. The terms of his presidency has/had no real impact on us except symbolism and pride. More could’ve been done but he chose not to. So deploying him to talk at us is ineffective.

Of course not every candidate meets every bullet point we personally have as far as their policies. They’ll meet in one area and then the next is absolutely not in favor with our morals and needs. Everyone makes consensus for the areas that don’t meet. And there can be one singular policy a candidate we don’t particularly favor has that meets what we want and that alone can be the deciding factor. And a candidates stance and policy on these can be the dealbreaker. Reparations, women’s reproductive rights, and immigration are some of those top areas Black Americans have at the forefront. Of the two of them, neither really have an edge over the other. And many Black Americans are becoming more vocal with immigration because it is an issue. Immigration has a negative impact on Black Americans and neither candidate wants to have sensible laws on it. One is in favor of allowing more immigrants while the other isn’t that all more favorable but wants a certain demographic of immigrants. And we see the benefits and assistance many immigrants are receiving without any need for task force and studies (further making Black Americans realize that we will get no support from Harris and Harris is looking out for those she does share background with as a 1st generation American-her representation). Women’s reproductive rights is really the only solid area in which they majorly differ.

Neither are on board for just a study on reparations for BAs — here is where the break is. Harris has outright said she won’t and of the two, we’d at least think she’d be in support of. She isn’t. It’s expected Trump won’t. He’s a white man with racist views that side with white terrorists groups & have supported those groups but Harris, you aren’t either of what he is so for her to be so opposed to reparations for BAs is turning alot of Black voters away. Not to say every voter they don’t gain or regain from Obama’s days still won’t vote Harris but this party is making it easier and easier to look elsewhere. Losing votes to the Green Party or independent candidates and making their republican opponents have an easier time will be on their hands if they continue to operate this same, stale way.

Donald Trump’s Project25 is absolutely terrible and will be! Having this response to some Black voters is a very legitimate reason to absolutely gain any voters who were unsure. When anyone hears Back voters say, “…that seems to be hyperbole” in response to “If Trump gets back in office, we’ll go back to Jim Crow”…this is why some Black Americans feel somewhat grey to it because:

Black Americans are still being lynched in ‘24, still facing discrimination in banks with receiving loans, being denied loans and given higher interest rate loans for being Black, our wealth gap continues to widen between all groups (we are projected to be at $0 for household median wealth in 2053), Black homelessness is the highest amongst any group, devaluing of our home’s value when on the market, Black women still facing racism in hospitals and dying in care simply giving birth, environmental/infrastructure racism (Flint still has the same water issue and other cities too), Black communities are situated in what’s called cancer alleys, mass incarceration, police killings, stop and frisk, more funding for police, higher criminalization on offenses that disproportionately impact Black people (the decriminalizing policy is a bit ironic in many ways when one party pushed for extremely strict punitive consequences on it decades ago), still faced with school closures for our kids & underfunding and lack of funding and lack of employment, unemployment and under employment, massacres of Black people continue, police brutality is steady, voter restrictions, the lack of Black home ownership and red lining and sooo much more. We aren’t going back to anything when these new-age Black codes really haven’t gone anywhere in the first place. Under this current administration—the prior one. Both Democratic and Republican. Neither have done anything.

But when the Democratic Party is looking like nothing will edge over the Republican Party, you will see voter abandonment from Black Americans. And the abandonment does not mean it’s for Trump. Because that man is absolutely not what Black Americans want…again. We didn’t want him the first go round.

There are other candidates from other parties — but as we all know, those non-bipartisan candidates aren’t making moves unfortunately so voting for them is almost a null and void at this point in time. It’s a ghost vote because if I vote for Cornel West or Jill Stein, it won’t have effective impact at all. You can’t even write down West on the ballot in some states. Voting non dem or non pub means just about nothing with our system right now. And then again, you will have many Black voters who will vote directly against the Democratic Party and vote for Trump—which is why Obama came out wagging his finger in the first place. Which is ironic how we have yet to see any videos of him visiting Indian American or Jamaican American communities doing the same. Communities that are part of Harris’ background. But of course, the parental rebuke is reserved for us only.

Choices. Black voters have our choice (to participate or to sit out) and the blue party has been making their choice too. The Democratic Party keeps taking their definite solid Black block for granted and are now are at risk for losing them.

Like the dems refuse to realize that their continued benign neglect is pushing the Black vote towards everyone else except them. This party is opening the door for a repeat Trump in the future. I say future Trumps because I doubt he’s winning this 2024 election (he hasn’t run on a thing different last election or pretty much nothing at all—the fact again that he even was in office will never cease to amaze me) but the republicans have created clones of him that we will dangerously see in the future. With him winning again or not.

This is only the beginning of struggling to keep the collective vote from the Black demographic. If the Democrats keep with this only show up and castigate when we need your vote, expect future election cycles to be just like this. If the plan in the future is that this particular party won’t need the Black vote and can get a loyal block elsewhere, then they’re doing a great job at setting this in motion with their alienation. They’ve had voter allegiance from Black Americans for so, so many years…entire generations of households have simply voted blue no matter who and now, it’s looking like that won’t be automatic anymore. The Democrats have been benign neglecting for so long that a whole opposing candidate with dictatorship on the brain is still making voters unsure of which of the two they want. The Dems should have an easy win against the Republicans based on so many things this year and it isn’t. That speaks volumes.

If Harris|Walz don’t win, the dems can take full accountability for it.

“The Democratic Party realizes that the Black vote is dwindling because the Democratic Party has not delivered for the Black community in the way that the Black community has delivered for the Democratic Party in terms of votes.”

and once Harris gets in office, Black Americans, leave her and her admin alone on the reparations issues. you don’t get to ask her anymore once you vote her in — she’s already made her stance on it plain. the sense of urgency being only within this week is something else.

[lesbiansandgayssupporttheminers]

I want to write a little bit about structural racism in the UK against Travellers, and the Labour Party's complicity with this because I think it might help explain why that letter from Diane Abbott disturbed me so much.

Romani and Irish Travellers in the UK experience discrimination all the time. They'll be barred from shops and pubs, they experience discrimination from the police, they experience racial abuse. If they are living a nomadic lifestyle, they struggle to access schools and hospitals. Educational outcomes for Romani students are the worst in England by a large margin, followed by Irish Travellers. They're also over represented in the prison population compared to the proportion of the general population they make up.

Irish Travellers are generally "white/white passing" although they are a distinct ethnic group from the settled Irish. However, not all Romani people are "white passing" and some see themselves as PoC. Both groups have fought for a long time to be recognised officially as ethnic minorities and to gain legal protections.

In 2022, the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts act was passed. This is the "bill" that was the focus of the "kill the bill" protests, and lots was written about the restrictions it placed on protestors. However, part 4 of the bill related to unauthorised encampments. Although the law does not specifically name any ethnic groups, it effectively criminalises the traditional nomadic traveller lifestyle.

It creates an offence of residing in a vehicle (this would include a caravan) on land without permission. It allows the police to seize the vehicle, even prior to the offence being committed. It allows the police to impose fines and prison sentences.

Although the bill itself does not name any particular ethnic group, much of the advice and communication around the bill does. This is because it's clearly designed to target certain groups who live a traditional nomadic lifestyle. It's designed to make them homeless, and force them into housing- essentially forced assimilation. The British have been trying to do this to Romani and Irish Travellers for centuries.

This law was passed by the Tories, but one thing people don't know is that Starmer whipped the Labour party against most sections of the bill. He allowed a free vote on Section 4- the section that specifically related to "unauthorised encampments".

Around the same time, in 2021, his party produced local election leaflets which mentioned "traveller incursions"- eventually they admitted the leaflets were racist and destroyed them. It's not the first time, and won't be the last, that Labour use racism against these groups to win points with the electorate.

In this context, Abbott is part of a system which is systematically discriminating against Romani and Irish Travellers- yes, Labour aren't the party in power, but they are a part of the system enabling this to happen.

So, I read her letter in that context. I read her minimisation of the struggles of the most marginalised ethnic groups in our society in that context (I don't want to make this "who has things worst" but it's nonetheless true). At best, she's throwing them under the bus to make a point she thinks will be popular with her supporters. At worst, she's actively affirming her own party's racist policies.

"It doesn't matter if we criminalise their way of life, because it's not "real" racism".

She is someone seen to be on the left, seen to be anti-racist, and she's effectively saying this prejudice is acceptable.

[yourdailyqueer]

Tiara Mack

Gender: Female

Sexuality: Queer

DOB: 21 December 1993

Ethnicity: African American

Occupation: Politician (Democrat), former prof rugby player, activist

Note: As of 2022 Mack is the first openly queer black person elected to the Rhode Island Senate

[pumpumdemsugah]

When it's politically expediant, the right will allow visible minorities in leadership position and will, in fact, fast track them because they have an X doing/ saying it. Years ago, I read an article about Condoleezza Rice, and part of her decision to join the republican party was the idea that it would be easier to rise being a Black person there than the Democrats.

Part of the appeal of Kemi Badenoch is that she's a Black face being far right. Her race and gender played a part, but not in the way people usually think about it. Kemi also denies that British colonialism made Britain wealthy. Of course, the far right loves her. The right wing LOVES identity, but it's expressed in a very different way everyone loves to deny it is about identity. Working class Black people are hounded for pointing this out and accused of saying Black people think one way and then lectured about the same thing we pointed out because we see it from welloff Black conservative politicians all the time.

I love people ignoring part of why Lizz Trust was selected was because she was white British and Christian vs Rishi. Also, our Parliamentary system doesn't work like the US. Members of the part select their leader, not the general public. We don't know how Kemi will be received as tory leader.

[queerism1969]

[thashining]

Really....