#Berne Convention

[alabaster-raven-illustrations]

Property of Italy - 16x12" - Mixed Media

[tnlnyc]

AI Copyright : It's complicated

Delving into the intriguing realm of AI and Copyright! How does generative AI challenge content ownership? Let's unravel the complexities of copyright, fair use, and the future of AI-generated creativity. Join the conversation! #AI #Copyright

The ownership of creative work has long been fundamental to the spread of ideas. Creators have been remunerated for their work, allowing them the ability to live off their creativity. The recent explosion of generative AI may destroy the creative arts unless we can better define who owns AI-generated work products and what AI copyright may look like. The Berne Convention The Berne Convention,…

[valiancenodel]

Just so you guys know, because this happens to be one of my fields of knowledge, if a brand in the US is registered (and Twitter probably is), then it belongs to the bussiness for a period of ten years, after which, they have to renew it. And even if they don't, they have a period of about six months of grace to recover said brand.

After that, if it isn't registered, it becomes a trademark, and it's still protected... in the state where the bussiness is based. Of course, there are things to take into account here, like if the bussiness has been protecting the trademark, but the thing is that it's complicated and may have lawyers involved. I suppose that Space Karen's level of intelligence, as much as I doubt about it, reachs to the point where he can hire decent lawyers... right?

So I'm afraid no, you can't start a copy of Twitter.

Also, if you said you managed to copy and understand nearly 15 years of code in four different programming languages, you're either a divinity or a liar. And the code is also protected by Intellectual Property laws btw.

("Didn't you say you were Spanish? How do you know about this crap?")

I happen to have studied a bit about publishing, which also means that I've learned about IP laws, and the fight between WotC and Justin LaNasa is a trainwreck I've been watching like a hawk.

Hang on, though, if at this point he's changed everything from the format to the functionality to the name... Could someone now legally and literally start a new Twitter? Like, not a new Twitter alternative - literally just clone the old one, right down to the name? Because the comedic potential...

[anawkwardlady]

Okay I've been trying to write this for more than a week but frustratingly wasn't able to properly line my thought. Recently thought about Kyrie's violent assassination of Jessica during Ep7's Tea Party. And while theres some plausible practical explanation of why she proceeded that way (on top of all those traits that could be purposefully exaggerated) I always thought her sudden blood lust at that point felt a bit odd. I re-read the scene.

And I think it retroactively says a lot. Now I kinda want to go back to Rudolf in relationship to sexuality, women and by extension what it means for the people around him. Rudolf didn't have a lot of ways to establish a place, as a third in rank who was abused and mistreated by his older and more powerful siblings. Women thus became Rudolf's wealth, status symbol and means of control. Starting with using seduction towards the younger servants to isolate his little sister so she had no allies in the household, making himself a desirable option as a charismatic man bragging about money to have women fight over him during college and finally ending with the best of both worlds, marrying a kind and submissive woman (epitome of The Wife) while keeping the more exotic option on the side as a mistress (basically his Whore). Both being kept on their toes knowing losing him would also mean losing a life opportunity especially once pregnant. Rudolf made efforts and sacrifices to make each one of them stay at their assigned place which finally lead to the baby switching. And everything would have ran smoothly if not for Asumu's death, upgrading Kyrie from her mistress place to wife.

Rudolf's "attraction" towards Natsuhi is interesting. Whether it's played as jokes or comments about her looks it does seem trivial enough to never have triggered outward hostility from Kyrie since she is not an actual threatening woman. She however represents the wife fantasy by her seemingly pure and naive demeanor and motherly side, qualities that also drew him towards Asumu in the first place (and we know Natsuhi is more complicated than that and so was Asumu, probably it's more about the idea) and was lost after her death. He can't seduce her (she is maybe more disgusted by his ways than anything), She is also paradoxically not the best woman to go after by societal standards (being older, already having a kid). Finally she is married to a man who's superior to him (through hierarchy and physical strength), making her a prized possession by extension. During Episode's 8 Bern's game Rudolf finds sadistic pleasure of murdering Natsuhi in ways similar to sexual assault (putting the pen of the gun down her throat) which could be speculated as a way to get revenge on Krauss by defiling his wife and getting to have his way with a woman he cannot, and could never have at the same time. She is unreachable which is itself the appeal.

Meanwhile, Kyrie only reached the position of the wife because the first option died and she now has to spend the rest of her life making sure that place isn't stolen. Throughout the conference Kyrie actively performs a less assertive version of herself to fit that very wife image. One could fear any sign of fondness from Rudolf towards Natsuhi's character could trigger Kyrie past insecurities as it would betray a yearning for what Asumu was, what is still lacking within her. Especially since, by the time of Ep7's tea party, she is aware of the baby switching and by extension, of Rudolf purposeful sabotage to avoid having to marry her. It's hard for Kyrie to adapt to Rudolf's ideals because they're ultimately contradictory (seeking her because she is "different", ruthless, less conventional, yearning for a more quiet, meek woman who wouldn't challenge him).

Although Natsuhi is, as a person, inoffensive to her, Kyrie's initial mistake with Asumu (which haunts her to this day) was letting a woman she thought was inoffensive take her place by being exactly that. (I'll also note that Rudolf comments towards Natsuhi are often said in front of Kyrie which is interesting to say the least).

And at the same time Natsuhi is also a reminder of the position Kyrie would be stuck in if she wasn't able to escape her family to marry Rudolf. Theres probably some turmoil there. She never seemed hostile to Natsuhi because of all those reasons and I think it's probably because nothing is actively taking place, nothing is about her as a person. But even if, things to keep in mind is that, Kyrie performs a lot, extremely well and she has absolutely no angle or justification to be confrontational during the conferences. Basically if she actually beared resentment, theres a chance we would never know.

Then what about Jessica. Jessica previously being praised by Rudolf for looking like Natsuhi in something that seemed like a passing comment getting violently assaulted to the point of being disfigured. Kyrie even throwing in a comment about being used to smashing women faces, something that was certainly aimed at romantic rivals. I don't think Rudolf actually ever showed interest towards Jessica in that way and by extension I don't think Kyrie considered her to be a romantic or sexual rival as a person. At the time Kyrie confronts her Natsuhi already died rather quickly (and anticlimactically). Jessica is her mother's good looks though younger but with those less conventional attractive qualities, who fought back when attacked thus literally standing between Kyrie and her escape, metaphorically embodying the ultimate rival. Close enough to be a reminder, far enough to actually oppose threat. Disfiguring as catharsis and as symbolic rage against what she represents, "A waste a of a good Natsuhi-esque woman" with all that it entails.

[calabria-mediterranea]

Soverato, Calabria, Italy

Soverato is known above all for its enchanting blue sea, but not many people know that the bay of Soverato is home to many protected species.

Two species of seahorses can usually be found in the bay of Soverato: the Hippocampus hippocampus and the , both in danger of extinction and included in the CITES list - "Convention on International Trade in Endagered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora".

In ecology, seahorses are considered a valid indicator of environmental quality, since they are sedentary organisms that live in habitats in a state of natural equilibrium.

In the bay of Soverato the pipefish (Syngnathus abaster) and the large-shelled mollusc Tonna galea, can also be found. Both fishes are included in the protection list of the Bern Convention.

Follow us on Instagram, @calabria_mediterranea

[thdramas2]

772598849890041856/can-you-actually-protect-toyhouse-ocs-under

Anything you create is automatically assigned copyright provided your country is part of The Berne Convention(which most countries are) this includes art work you sell etc Unless you are selling/made for commissions the full commercial rights the art will still belong to you under copyright laws

Buying OCs the og art would still be protected but to the OG artist and design can be called yours since you paid for it and anything you make after that like the bio/info art is 100% your and should also be protected as writing is also included in copyright

Berne Convention gives the minimal amount of protection but still is protected under copyright and a creator need not register or "apply for" a copyright in countries adhering to the convention But can also have the option to go a register things for greater protection but that's if you have money and well aimed more at companies.

Trademarking is different from copyright and that is a lengthy process

Sorry for the info ramble

TLDR - Yes OCs on TH and anywhere else is copyrighted and no need to register copyright if your country is under Berne Convention

/

[wolveswolves]

Sweden’s biggest, controversial endangered wolf cull has started but campaigners fight on 

February 2023 - Hunters have already shot dead 54 wolves in Sweden’s largest ever cull, while scientists warn that wolf numbers are not large enough to sustain a healthy population

Hunters have shot dead 54 wolves in a month in Sweden’s largest and most controversial cull of the animals yet, prompting fury from conservationists and satisfaction among farmers who consider the predators a threat to their livelihoods.

The Stockholm government has authorised the shooting of 75 wolves in its 2023 cull, more than twice last year’s figure, despite warnings from scientists that wolf numbers are not large enough to sustain a healthy population.

“Wolves are a threat for those of us who live in rural areas,” said Kjell-Arne Ottosson, a Christian Democrat MP and vice-president of the parliament’s environment and agriculture committee. “We have to manage that. We have to take this seriously.”

Farmers say more than 340 sheep were killed in 2021 by a Swedish wolf population estimated at about 460. The predators, which in the 1960s were thought to be extinct in Sweden, are also resented by hunters, who say the dogs they use to track and drive deer and elk are regularly attacked.

“This cull is absolutely necessary to slow the growth of wolves. Sweden’s wolf population is the largest we have had in modern times,” Gunnar Glöersen, predator manager at the Swedish Hunters’ Association, told public broadcaster SVT.

However, the scale of this year’s planned cull – only 203 wolves have been shot in total in Sweden in the 12 years since authorised hunting resumed – has alarmed conservationists. “It’s tragic,” said Daniel Ekblom of the Nature Conservation Society. “It could have consequences for a long time to come.”

Scientists have said that to sustain a healthy population, the wolf population roaming Sweden and Finland should not fall below 500, and Sweden’s Environmental Protection Agency has said at least 300 are necessary to avoid harmful inbreeding.

Led by centre- and far-right parties, however, Sweden’s parliament voted two years ago to cap the wolf population at 270, while the Swedish Hunters’ Association wants to go even further and lower the limit to 150 animals.

Wolf numbers fell steeply in Sweden after 1789, when a law was passed allowing commoners to hunt. That led to the decimation of the deer and elk populations, prompting wolves to prey more on livestock – and the state to pay a bounty for every wolf killed.

The population shrank to the brink of extinction and the predator was declared a protected species in the 1960s. Numbers began growing again 20 years later, however, when three wolves from the Russian-Finnish population migrated to central Sweden.

Conservation organizations in the country have attempted to overturn the wolf hunting mandate but have been unsuccessful.

Groups used the Bern Convention as their main argument. An international treaty agreed upon in 1979, the convention seeks to protect both wildlife and their habitats. Actions to do so are taken in the name of conservation.

“Wolves as top predators in the food chain are a prerequisite for biodiversity. Killing a quarter of the population through hunting has negative consequences for animals and nature,” Marie Stegard, president of Swedish anti-hunting group Jaktkritikerna told the Guardian.

“It’s disastrous for the entire ecosystem. The existence of wolves contributes to a richer animal and plant life. Human survival depends on healthy ecosystems.”

The European Commission has previously opened infringement proceedings against Sweden, warning that the annual cull falls foul of the EU’s habitats directive since “the wolf population has not reached a level that guarantees its conservation”.

“It’s astonishing that Sweden keeps on making these decisions,” said Marie Stegard Lind of the anti-hunting group Jaktkritikerna. “The commission has been very clear about its opinion that these hunts are, in fact, illegal,” Lind told AFP.

This year’s cull began in early January and ends on 15 February, although several regional authorities have already called it off having reached their quota. Experts have said the government’s planned national total of 75 wolves may not be reached.

Under pressure from farmers and hunters, the government authorised limited annual culls again in 2010. Since then, the wolf “has become a symbol of the conflict between the city and rural areas”, Johanna Sandahl of the Nature Conservation Society told AFP.

Sources: [x], [x]

[tomorrowusa]

Sen. Bernie Sanders visited Stephen Colbert after Trump's seemingly endless acceptance speech at the Republican convention. His refutation of Trump was more succinct as well as more interesting than The Orange One's speech.

In that segment he describes the total lack of attention Republicans devote to climate change – except to give free rein to fossil fuel oligarchs to put even more greenhouse gasses into Earth's atmosphere.

He also outlines how the attention the GOP devotes to working Americans is just superficial bullshit. The GOP opposes raising the minimum wage but favors even more MAGA tax breaks for the filthy rich.

The Bern described our system as a "semi-democracy" because it gives disproportionate power to oligarchic billionaires who can more easily influence the system. He singled out the disastrous 2010 Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision as the main culprit in corrupting our political system.

I would add that there only two ways of overturning Citizens United: 1] a US Constitutional amendment (good luck with that!); 2] a subsequent SCOTUS decision overturning Citizens United. #2 is possible in the medium turn – as long as progressives understand that the main goal in any presidential or senatorial election should be the defeat of Republicans who appoint extremist SCOTUS justices. Casting symbolic "protest" votes for impotent third party candidates who have no chance of winning has only led to more justices like Alito and Kavanaugh.

[friendlymathematician]

the cowards removed rowling's name from the harry potter exhibit, but not the actual exhibit. i hope she sues the shit out of them. i'm reasonably certain the berne convention on artist's rights (and in particular the moral right, or right to be named) applies here.

[randomnameless]

To continue the woobified view of the Elites and my comparison of them to the Black Eagles :

Same for me regarding the BE, especially because they also literally fought Edelgard's troops in WC when you choose their house, and even if you don't, they definitely still would know that Edelgard dus nasty shits in WC.

The idea that media literacy is dead is quite fitting, because the idea that even rotten persons have loved ones/that having loved ones doesn't mean you're not rotten is a known thing, yet the Eagles and elites get a pass solely because "they genuinely believe in the cause" and "they love and care for each other"

Probably Fraldarius was as devoted to Nemesis as Ingrid to Dimitri, Lamine very well may have been as sassy as Dorothea, perhaps Goneril was as brave and endearing as Caspar, or Maurice was as loyal to his clan's interests as Petra to Brigid's happiness (through a strong bond to the Empire) but like the BE, they are butchers, who relished in the destruction of everything those against them hold dear, lap dogs and rabid curs of someone they definitely know have crushed innocents and scorn the very idea of peace except under their domination.

The only meaningful difference between Edelgard-following BE and the elites is that we can know more about the BE and we are forced to dislike cutting them down even as they refuse to let northern Fódlan alone.

Honestly I need a fanfiction where the BE are called out for that bullshit.

Yep!

That's the tone deaf feeling I got from Nopes, the Deers are hunting someone bcs their leader wants her dead for no reason, but Raph only comments on how hungry he is.

Uh, sure Raph, you're not the most thoughtful character in there, but come on? Some commentary or exposition on what you're doing? Hello KT? Can we have characters be challenged or even react to the events of screen instead of wondering what's for dinner/teatime?

No??

I wouldn't say it's an issue of media litteracy being dead, but more something in the lines of people being more and more "all or nothing" nowadays, without any nuance and conflating liking a character with the idea/image that might project on you : if I like ASOIAF's Cersei, I don't think everything she does is "justified", but modern fandom, I feel like some people would categorize you as a "good" or "bad" person based on the characters you like, and it's just... not what fandom is or was supposed to be imo, I'm here to nerd and gush about favourite characters, not write litteral essays about the Geneva Convention.

Corollary is what, imo, made the Fodlan fandom hell : some people really take "criticism" against a character personally - sure the way FE16 was written invites projection, but at the end of the day, making a Berning Fire Joke is, just, making a joke about a bunch of pixels, nothing more.

Back to the BEs, they can have a sense of camaraderie and genuinely support each other... as they tear apart "people because Supreme Leader told me to" and fight side by side with Bob the Carpented who was turned into Waldi the demonic beast.

Ferdie can skewer Flayn on her father's lance because she is "a creature that has plagued humanity for ages" even if they reached a C support before shit hit the fan - and still protect Mercedes and Bernie from their abusing Fathers. Does that make him a great guy? A nuanced guy?

I think the trope is called "even evil people have loved ones" or something like that?

I don't think so, but he is no random one note villain sycophant either - now, what is the more annoying with the Fodlan games is how this dichotomy is never called upon : everything is just a giant blob or Hresvelg Grey ("morally grey" but only applied to Supreme Leader) where no one really is angry at her, and all the "sacrifices" she's making are off-screen while the characters on-screen always moan about her "ReFoRmS" and "IdEaLs" without talking about the cost bar some milquetoast "but war bad". And no one, in the game, will ever throw this hypocrisy to their face - Gallant Ferdinand will dream about the Opera as he wipes off the blood of a young woman who just wanted to return to the only home she had.

Yay.

FWIW, some mutuals and I have nothing but pure lols about Doro's line in the non-CF routes being "we killed Ferdie professor :'(" because, hey, why should I care more about Ferdie than about random loldier 55 ? Rhea? Felix? Claude? Ignatz?

Maybe the Elites were really friends and became """"nice""" persons with time, to their families and loved ones ?

Does this magically erase what they did before? Will that "good" they did erase all the "wrongs" they have previously done? Will theyr forever escape the consequences of their actions?

In a game that depicts Flamey as a terrorist for 11 chapters only to drop that plot point by the window to moan, again, about her "IdEaLs", "consequences" are maybe something you can eat as a snack, or throw in a trashcan.

So following the rules of this verse, given how Supreme Leader never receives flak for her Flamey stunts, why should the Elites receive any for what they did? Look, Maurice calls Daphnel his friend, surely he is not that bad of a man? Well yeah, he might have seduced women and planted a lot of wild oats here'n'there, but he cares about his friends!

Jeritza likes ice creams and cats! Surely it's more important to paint him as a cat lover than to deal with all the consequences of his stunt as the Death Knight, kidnapping and implied rekting young woman while he was in GM, under Flamey's orders, right?

Calling it now, after eviscerating Seteth's older brother, Goneril might have melted in front of one of Rhea's kittens, and adopted the cat asap. Surely that makes Goneril a "good" character right? And forget the entire "genocided a bunch of hippies living isolated in their village" stuff?

I don't have fanfics recs where the BEs are called hypocrites, but I confess I don't read a lot of fanfics in the FE16 fandom because of all of the aforementioned issues.

[real-fire-emblem-takes]

I must say I quite dislike any Camus character past FE5. "Honorable guy on the other side" work when the other side isn't treating the geneva convention like a checklist, so it just end at up as the game trying to make you feel bad for fighting terrible people lmao. Shoutout to FE6 for trying to pull it twice with "Ethic cleaning in Sacae" Brunnya and "cuck king" Galle (seriously, no dedicated chapter, get passed over for fucking Narcian lmao, broken AI, guy don't even get "In the name of Bern" for god sake). Or the Black fang, who entire situation just stop making sense if you think about it for 5 second.

Kaga got it right with Reihardt : pathetic guy who "honor" push him to ignore atrocity, then his emperor tell him to go commit sucide by Leif and the idiot do it.

.

[wolves-facts]

Charlemagne institutionalized wolf hunting in France by establishing the louviterie, who were a corps of wolf hunters. The louviterie was dissolved in 1789, but reinstated in 1814. By 1930, wolves were completely eliminated from France. In the 1980s, wolves were thought to be returning, and in 1992 came the first confirmed sighting of a wolf in France in over 50 years. The wolf population in France is currently around 580 individuals. Although wolves are protected as an endangered species under the Berne Convention, official culls to protect livestock are permitted, so long as there is no threat to the national population as a whole. The louviterie still exists today, however their purpose was modified in 1971 to no longer focus on wolf hunting, and instead on vermin control and regulating the protection and hunting of wildlife.

[rjzimmerman]

Excerpt from this story from Mongabay:

Wolves across Europe are set to lose their “strictly protected” status. The move is seen as a win for farmers concerned about loss of livestock, but conservationists warn that removing protections will jeopardize stable wolf populations.

At a recent meeting of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, EU countries voted to adopt a proposal that will move wolves from “strictly protected” to “protected” status. The one-word change lowers the threshold for when wolves can be culled.

According to the European Commission, which proposed the status downgrade, “The concentration of wolf packs in some European regions has become a real danger especially for livestock. To manage critical wolf concentrations more actively, local authorities have been asking for more flexibility,” Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said in a press release.

Von der Leyen’s pony was killed by a wolf in 2022; she has since been focused on downgrading wolf protection in a way that European diplomats describe as “’strange,’ ‘bizarre,’ ‘puzzling,’ and definitely ‘pushy,’” Politico reports.

Researchers find culling wolves can actually lead to more livestock predation. A 2014 study in the American West found a 4-6% increase in sheep and cattle loss associated with culling wolves. The likely reason is that wolves hunt in packs but when packs are diminished, those left behind have a harder time hunting wild animals and instead target livestock, which are easier to get.

“Downlisting wolves won’t solve the challenges faced by rural communities, but it sets a dangerous precedent: decisions shaped by populism over science,” Sofie Ruysschaert of BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, said in a statement.

The European Ombudsman is investigating a complaint that the European Commission’s claim that wolves pose a threat to humans and livestock was not based on scientific evidence.

[jojobegood1]

Le loup sera désormais moins bien protégé en Europe

Le loup sera désormais moins bien protégé en Europe https://www.rts.ch/info/monde/2024/article/le-loup-sera-desormais-moins-bien-protege-en-europe-28715135.html

⚠️💘����⚠️ HONTEUX

[megabif]

Richard Serra

Tilted Arc

Nel 1979 il General Service Administration (GSA), un’agenzia indipendente del governo degli Stati Uniti, in accordo con il National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), decide di commissionare una scultura all’artista Richard Serra. È destinata alla Federal Plaza di New York. Dieci anni dopo, la scultura, chiamata Tilted Arc, viene smantellata, segata a pezzi, i suoi resti immagazzinati a Brooklyn. Nel mezzo accade di tutto. L’affaire Serra ridefinirà il concetto di site specificity di una scultura inserita nel tessuto urbano. In effetti, c’è qualcosa di radicale in questo artista che fin dagli inizi della sua carriera aveva deciso di utilizzare acciaio e piombo come materia espressiva. Nelle Lettere a Miranda Quatremère de Quincy si poneva domande riguardo allo spostamento delle opere d’arte italiane. All’epoca, la Rivoluzione francese aveva appena fatto il suo corso. Due secoli dopo la questione resta: distratta dal suo contesto l’opera perde il suo valore? “Rimuovere l’opera significa distruggere l’opera” afferma Richard Serra. La Street Art pone problemi simili.

Nel 1979, quando viene scelto dal GSA, Serra è già conosciuto, apprezzato. Nel 1970 aveva piazzato una struttura circolare in acciaio nel manto stradale di una via del Bronx (To Encircle Base Plate Hexagram Right Angles Inverted). L’anno successivo, piazza il St. John’s Rotary Arc nei pressi della rotatoria dell’Holland Tunnel. Certo, finché si tratta di una strada del Bronx, o di una rotatoria, nessuno fiata. Ma quando ti trovi di fronte il Federal Bureau of Investigation o una sede della corte di giustizia, è difficile farla franca.

Tilted Arc viene inaugurato nel 1981. Una linea di acciaio color ruggine di quaranta metri, alta quattro, leggermente curva e inclinata, taglia in due la piazza. Apriti cielo. La struttura “teatrale” del sito viene alterata, ciò di cui Serra era ben conscio. I cittadini si ritrovano proiettati dentro un nuovo contesto ambientale, ridefinito dalla scultura. È come se lo stesso concetto di “temporalità” subisse una torsione. Chi cammina sulla piazza è costretto a costeggiare l’opera. In un sito percorso usualmente di fretta, per motivi di lavoro, Serra costringe i passanti a rallentare, a lambire e “sentire” l’opera. Grazie a questo taglio in acciaio lo spazio viene ora sovvertito. Questa linea funge da contrappunto ambientale. È l’opera che ora definisce, impone il proprio territorio.

Ne succedono di tutti i colori. Un giudice protesta. Pone problemi di sicurezza. Finisce come in una lite condominiale, ma su larga scala. C’è chi pone questioni di decoro. La gente vi urina sopra (intervistato dal New York Times, che gli domanda quale sia il suo luogo favorito in città, Matthew Barney risponde: “Urinare riverentemente su Tilted Arc”). C’è chi vi aggiunge graffiti. Alcuni tirano in ballo il Muro di Berlino. Si tengono pubbliche udienze. Autorevoli critici d’arte difendono il lavoro di Serra. Nel 1985 la sede di Washington della GSA chiede che all’opera venga trovato un altro spazio. Serra avvia una causa per difendersi. La causa viene rigettata. Nel 1987 la NEA dichiara Tilted Arc “site specific”, e per questo inamovibile. Serra intanto va in appello. Nel 1989, dopo che Ronald Reagan ha firmato la Berne Convention, legge in difesa dei beni letterari e artistici, Tilted Arcviene smantellato. Per qualche tempo, una specie di cicatrice sulla pavimentazione funziona da indice dell’opera. Ora, restano solo fotografie, più la documentazione, gli atti di questa battaglia espressiva.

Via

[evangelifloss]

For the ship bingo, Lambdabern!! <33

Lambdabern, or as I like to call them Berndadelta, is THE SHIP. It is so good. What is better than eldritch-like Witch Lesbians who travel between worlds causing genuine tragedies for the funnies? Not to mention they usually do these things to try and fuck eachother over. If Bern is trying to do something abhorrent for the fun of it, Lambda will certainly arrive out of absolutely nowhere, and join the opposite "team" just so that she can make Bern's life harder. And don't get it wrong, Bern does exactly the same shit too. Basically if one of them is having fun in a universe, it is guaranteed the other is not far behind. Maybe the fact that both of them are equally terrifying to fucken everyone (aside from Featherine) is because you're going to be dealing with two insanely powerful Witches instead of one.

PEAK ROMANCE RIGHT THERE. I love them. They are so dramatic for eachother, and the concept of I don't know, being fuckin' normal about their love is virtually impossible.

Clarification on the choices in chart

I ship them as divorced: These two are the definition of contradiction. They're separated, willingly, by the Endless Sea of Fragments but they always find one another yet every time they do, they are so incredibly petty towards eachother. It's indistinguishable from a bitter divorced couple forced into a social setting together and they are so intent on viciously attempting to make the other humiliated in some way. They come up with increasingly complicated schemes for the sheer sake of trying to make the other lose. At the same time, they remember EVERYTHING about eachother, every goddamn intimate detail. They seek one another out across an infinite time-scape to have fun. They promise to meet up again once the fun is over. They have a mutual desire to inflict torture upon the other. They cuddle in a posh bed and share candies. They love eachother so much that either one of them suffering is a reason to celebrate. I could go on.

They're going to be the death of me: Literally. Meeting either of them will just end with me dying horribly or suffering a fate worse than death. In another sense, reading their insane mind games to force one of them to lose is so entertaining that any time they're pulling out every stop and twist, and backstabbing, makes me so entertained that it's a Bit Much for my brain. I get a serious case of brainrot WHENEVER I remember or come across scenes of their simultaneous and dramatic treachery towards eachother. Plus the fan-art and content is too good sometimes.

They should stay as far away from eachother: Every single time they cross paths, shit goes down and everyone involved becomes severely Traumatized. Or any underlying/current trauma of the victims gets irrevocably intensified. Plus, the longer they are apart, the more extreme they become. It's almost as if they miss eachother and want to make up for lost time by finding new, torturous and downright machiavellian ways to cause pain. This is amazing LOL

People that ship them need therapy: Anyone who is invested in umineko and berndadelta needs to find help.

It's more funny than romantic: Oh it is definitely romantic, but holy shit their dynamic is hilarious and for Witches like Lambda and Bern, conventional romance isn't their thing. You could say that they are romantic, but in an incredibly fucked up way that humans cannot replicate nor grasp. You can understand it theoretically but that's pretty much it. I don't even think a serial killer who has an obsession towards their designated Special Person could keep up at all.

Relationship Goals: I may be unhinged but even I think whatever the hell is going on between Lambda and Bern is a bit fuckin much. It's more about the dedication, their sincerity and exclusivity. I cannot imagine either of them having anyone else be sufficient for their needs. Cheating is only on the table when it comes to playing games in other people's tragedies. I can say with certainty that Lambda wouldn't ever kiss another person in an expression of love. And I can say that there is no miracle which exists where Bernkastel would lower her guard towards anyone other than Lambda (outside of their games of course, her guard is up lest the lamb win and disgrace the glory of The Witch of Miracles, Lady Bernkastel. Lambda would never let her live it down.)

The Aesthetic is everything to me: Granted I'm not a fan of Blue and Red/other bright "opposite" color coded pairings, BUT that is because it's become an oversaturated trope in most media these days. When it comes to Lambda and Bern however, it fuckin slaps AND Umineko was written a fair while back where it wasn't AS common, so I guess you could say I'm a little biased. Aside from the color, their actual designs are not only perfect complements to their natures but are really well done and unique. It's pleasing to look at. Another factor of their aesthetic is their titles, or rather, what "domain" they rule over. A Witch of Miracles, who can find just about any possibility as long as its existence isn't 0, with the Witch of Certainty who grants a desired outcome based on the determination and effort of the individual is SUCH synchronicity I have no choice but to admire it... and also get extreme autism brainrot whenever I think about it.

If you've read this far, I'm sure that you're just as clinically insane as I am and for those of you who haven't played umineko, go do that. There are Witch Lesbians. Also murder.

Side note: thank you my love Roseofcards for the ask, this was such a banger to write. I also had to write it twice, because tumblr crashed. Don't ask me how long it took to write this reply in one session... let's just say, there's no movie night tonight.