#Battery Scooter Manufacturer

[supertech-electric]

Top E scooter Manufacturer  - Supertech Ev

Be ready for a life-changing experience with Supertech, the unquestionable leader in the e-scooter manufacturers. Supertech builds a lot more than just a simple scooter; they construct experiences on two wheels. Imagine riding through city streets in a smooth, futuristic vehicle that is more than simply a method of travel; however, it's a powerful statement. Supertech is dedicated to advancing environmental friendly transportation in addition to elegance. As the top e scooter manufacturer, they are redefining urban transportation with electric scooters that provide not just an exciting ride but also an assurance of a sustainable future. Supertech is a prominent player in the environmental friendly urban solutions area, showing that top-notch production can exist peacefully with awareness of the environment.

[evehiclesindia]

Battery Scooter Manufacturer - Supertech Ev

Here at Supertech, we create more than simply scooters, we're showcasing our talent in a street symphony of sass! Being the best battery scooter manufacturer in the market, we're not just into making rides; we're into reinventing electric cool. Imagine yourself speeding across the city on our electric scooters; every trip makes a statement and is a small step forward in the world of transportation. We are not only E-scooter manufacturers, but we also design futuristic joyrides that masterfully combine sustainability and style. Now, if you're prepared to leave the ordinary behind and experience the extraordinary, board the Supertech Express, where unparalleled swagger meets Battery Scooters. Come on, let's get going! Ordinary is so last season! 

[metalmanauto]

Top 5 Automotive Companies and How Metalman Auto Ltd. Supports Them

The automotive industry is dominated by several key players that lead the market in terms of innovation, production, and market share. The top five automotive companies globally are typically considered to be Toyota, Volkswagen Group, Daimler AG (Mercedes-Benz), Ford Motor Company, and General Motors (GM).

How Metalman Auto Ltd. Supports These Automotive Giants

As a leading supplier of high-quality automotive components, Metalman Auto Ltd. is well-positioned to support these top automotive companies. Our expertise in metal fabrication and assembly allows us to provide critical components that meet the specific needs of these manufacturers.

Our Value Proposition:

High-Precision Components: We provide parts that are essential for the safety and performance of vehicles, adhering to the exact specifications required by these top manufacturers.

Collaborative Approach: We work closely with OEMs to understand their needs and provide innovative solutions that enhance vehicle performance and safety.

Sustainable Manufacturing: Our commitment to sustainable practices ensures we contribute positively to the automotive industry’s environmental goals.

By partnering with Metalman Auto, these top automotive companies can enhance their supply chain efficiency and maintain their competitive edge in the global market.

[lithiumionbattery]

Jackvolt- Your perfect Electric Scooter battery partner

Electric scooters are becoming increasingly popular in India as they offer a convenient and eco-friendly mode of transport. Jackvolt is one of the leading electric scooter battery manufacturers in India, and our products are designed to provide the best possible performance and reliability.

We use the latest technology and high quality materials to produce our lithium batteries, and our team of experts oversees every step of the manufacturing process to ensure that our products meet the highest standards. And our customer assistance is second to none.

Our batteries are available in various sizes and capacities, and we offer a wide range of accessories to ensure that they can be used with any make or model of electric scooter. Whether you're looking for a replacement battery for your existing scooter or upgrading to a higher-capacity model, Jackvolt has the perfect solution for you. So get yours from us now!

[reasonsforhope]

Green energy is in its heyday. 

Renewable energy sources now account for 22% of the nation’s electricity, and solar has skyrocketed eight times over in the last decade. This spring in California, wind, water, and solar power energy sources exceeded expectations, accounting for an average of 61.5 percent of the state's electricity demand across 52 days. 

But green energy has a lithium problem. Lithium batteries control more than 90% of the global grid battery storage market. 

That’s not just cell phones, laptops, electric toothbrushes, and tools. Scooters, e-bikes, hybrids, and electric vehicles all rely on rechargeable lithium batteries to get going. 

Fortunately, this past week, Natron Energy launched its first-ever commercial-scale production of sodium-ion batteries in the U.S. 

“Sodium-ion batteries offer a unique alternative to lithium-ion, with higher power, faster recharge, longer lifecycle and a completely safe and stable chemistry,” said Colin Wessells — Natron Founder and Co-CEO — at the kick-off event in Michigan. 

The new sodium-ion batteries charge and discharge at rates 10 times faster than lithium-ion, with an estimated lifespan of 50,000 cycles.

Wessells said that using sodium as a primary mineral alternative eliminates industry-wide issues of worker negligence, geopolitical disruption, and the “questionable environmental impacts” inextricably linked to lithium mining. 

“The electrification of our economy is dependent on the development and production of new, innovative energy storage solutions,” Wessells said. 

Why are sodium batteries a better alternative to lithium?

The birth and death cycle of lithium is shadowed in environmental destruction. The process of extracting lithium pollutes the water, air, and soil, and when it’s eventually discarded, the flammable batteries are prone to bursting into flames and burning out in landfills. 

There’s also a human cost. Lithium-ion materials like cobalt and nickel are not only harder to source and procure, but their supply chains are also overwhelmingly attributed to hazardous working conditions and child labor law violations. 

Sodium, on the other hand, is estimated to be 1,000 times more abundant in the earth’s crust than lithium. 

“Unlike lithium, sodium can be produced from an abundant material: salt,” engineer Casey Crownhart wrote ​​in the MIT Technology Review. “Because the raw ingredients are cheap and widely available, there’s potential for sodium-ion batteries to be significantly less expensive than their lithium-ion counterparts if more companies start making more of them.”

What will these batteries be used for?

Right now, Natron has its focus set on AI models and data storage centers, which consume hefty amounts of energy. In 2023, the MIT Technology Review reported that one AI model can emit more than 626,00 pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent. 

“We expect our battery solutions will be used to power the explosive growth in data centers used for Artificial Intelligence,” said Wendell Brooks, co-CEO of Natron. 

“With the start of commercial-scale production here in Michigan, we are well-positioned to capitalize on the growing demand for efficient, safe, and reliable battery energy storage.”

The fast-charging energy alternative also has limitless potential on a consumer level, and Natron is eying telecommunications and EV fast-charging once it begins servicing AI data storage centers in June. 

On a larger scale, sodium-ion batteries could radically change the manufacturing and production sectors — from housing energy to lower electricity costs in warehouses, to charging backup stations and powering electric vehicles, trucks, forklifts, and so on. 

“I founded Natron because we saw climate change as the defining problem of our time,” Wessells said. “We believe batteries have a role to play.”

-via GoodGoodGood, May 3, 2024

--

Note: I wanted to make sure this was legit (scientifically and in general), and I'm happy to report that it really is! x, x, x, x

[ceeonindia321]

Best Electric Rickshaw Manufacturer And Supplier Company in India

 Best and top electric rickshaw manufacturer and supplier company in India “Ceeon India” top leading electric vehicle manufactures with complete range of Battery rickshaw manufacturers in India, E rickshaw, E Loader, E Garbage van, Electric Scooter, E Bike, Two Wheelers manufacturers, etc. We focused on delivering premium quality products and better customer services. For more information visit us:- https://ceeonindia.co.in/

[rfantennaindia]

11.1V 7.5Ah LITHIUM ION BATTERY PACK

Batteries

Eteily Manufactures Best Quality and Light weight Rechargeable Battery. These batteries are commonly used for portable electronics and electric vehicles charger. The lithium ion battery have a high energy density, no memory effect, fast charging and low self-discharge. We have a wide range of Lithium-ion packs, Lithium Iron Phosphate packs, Polymer, Lead Acid, Prismatic batteries available in various capacities, voltages, sizes at reasonable prices. 

We are also Manufacturer and Suppliers of Lithium ion Batteries in Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Pune, Bangalore, Kolkata and Ahmadabad.

[eashwa]

Electric scooty dealership in India \\ Top battery operated electric ve...

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Cleantech has an enshittification problem

On July 14, I'm giving the closing keynote for the fifteenth HACKERS ON PLANET EARTH, in QUEENS, NY. Happy Bastille Day! On July 20, I'm appearing in CHICAGO at Exile in Bookville.

EVs won't save the planet. Ultimately, the material bill for billions of individual vehicles and the unavoidable geometry of more cars-more traffic-more roads-greater distances-more cars dictate that the future of our cities and planet requires public transit – lots of it.

But no matter how much public transit we install, there's always going to be some personal vehicles on the road, and not just bikes, ebikes and scooters. Between deliveries, accessibility, and stubbornly low-density regions, there's going to be a lot of cars, vans and trucks on the road for the foreseeable future, and these should be electric.

Beyond that irreducible minimum of personal vehicles, there's the fact that individuals can't install their own public transit system; in places that lack the political will or means to create working transit, EVs are a way for people to significantly reduce their personal emissions.

In policy circles, EV adoption is treated as a logistical and financial issue, so governments have focused on making EVs affordable and increasing the density of charging stations. As an EV owner, I can affirm that affordability and logistics were important concerns when we were shopping for a car.

But there's a third EV problem that is almost entirely off policy radar: enshittification.

An EV is a rolling computer in a fancy case with a squishy person inside of it. While this can sound scary, there are lots of cool implications for this. For example, your EV could download your local power company's tariff schedule and preferentially charge itself when the rates are lowest; they could also coordinate with the utility to reduce charging when loads are peaking. You can start them with your phone. Your repair technician can run extensive remote diagnostics on them and help you solve many problems from the road. New features can be delivered over the air.

That's just for starters, but there's so much more in the future. After all, the signal virtue of a digital computer is its flexibility. The only computer we know how to make is the Turing complete, universal, Von Neumann machine, which can run every valid program. If a feature is computationally tractable – from automated parallel parking to advanced collision prevention – it can run on a car.

The problem is that this digital flexibility presents a moral hazard to EV manufacturers. EVs are designed to make any kind of unauthorized, owner-selected modification into an IP rights violation ("IP" in this case is "any law that lets me control the conduct of my customers or competitors"):

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

EVs are also designed so that the manufacturer can unilaterally exert control over them or alter their operation. EVs – even more than conventional vehicles – are designed to be remotely killswitched in order to help manufacturers and dealers pressure people into paying their car notes on time:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/24/rent-to-pwn/#kitt-is-a-demon

Manufacturers can reach into your car and change how much of your battery you can access:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/28/edison-not-tesla/#demon-haunted-world

They can lock your car and have it send its location to a repo man, then greet him by blinking its lights, honking its horn, and pulling out of its parking space:

https://tiremeetsroad.com/2021/03/18/tesla-allegedly-remotely-unlocks-model-3-owners-car-uses-smart-summon-to-help-repo-agent/

And of course, they can detect when you've asked independent mechanic to service your car and then punish you by degrading its functionality:

https://www.repairerdrivennews.com/2024/06/26/two-of-eight-claims-in-tesla-anti-trust-lawsuit-will-move-forward/

This is "twiddling" – unilaterally and irreversibly altering the functionality of a product or service, secure in the knowledge that IP law will prevent anyone from twiddling back by restoring the gadget to a preferred configuration:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/19/twiddler/

The thing is, for an EV, twiddling is the best case scenario. As bad as it is for the company that made your EV to change how it works whenever they feel like picking your pocket, that's infinitely preferable to the manufacturer going bankrupt and bricking your car.

That's what just happened to owners of Fisker EVs, cars that cost $40-70k. Cars are long-term purchases. An EV should last 12-20 years, or even longer if you pay to swap the battery pack. Fisker was founded in 2016 and shipped its first Ocean SUV in 2023. The company is now bankrupt:

https://insideevs.com/news/723669/fisker-inc-bankruptcy-chapter-11-official/

Fisker called its vehicles "software-based cars" and they weren't kidding. Without continuous software updates and server access, those Fisker Ocean SUVs are turning into bricks. What's more, the company designed the car from the ground up to make any kind of independent service and support into a felony, by wrapping the whole thing in overlapping layers of IP. That means that no one can step in with a module that jailbreaks the Fisker and drops in an alternative firmware that will keep the fleet rolling.

This is the third EV risk – not just finance, not just charger infrastructure, but the possibility that any whizzy, cool new EV company will go bust and brick your $70k cleantech investment, irreversibly transforming your car into 5,500 lb worth of e-waste.

This confers a huge advantage onto the big automakers like VW, Kia, Ford, etc. Tesla gets a pass, too, because it achieved critical mass before people started to wise up to the risk of twiddling and bricking. If you're making a serious investment in a product you expect to use for 20 years, are you really gonna buy it from a two-year old startup with six months' capital in the bank?

The incumbency advantage here means that the big automakers won't have any reason to sink a lot of money into R&D, because they won't have to worry about hungry startups with cool new ideas eating their lunches. They can maintain the cozy cartel that has seen cars stagnate for decades, with the majority of "innovation" taking the form of shitty, extractive and ill-starred ideas like touchscreen controls and an accelerator pedal that you have to rent by the month:

https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/23/23474969/mercedes-car-subscription-faster-acceleration-feature-price

Put that way, it's clear that this isn't an EV problem, it's a cleantech problem. Cleantech has all the problems of EVs: it requires a large capital expenditure, it will be "smart," and it is expected to last for decades. That's rooftop solar, heat-pumps, smart thermostat sensor arrays, and home storage batteries.

And just as with EVs, policymakers have focused on infrastructure and affordability without paying any attention to the enshittification risks. Your rooftop solar will likely be controlled via a Solaredge box – a terrible technology that stops working if it can't reach the internet for a protracted period (that's right, your home solar stops working if the grid fails!).

I found this out the hard way during the covid lockdowns, when Solaredge terminated its 3G cellular contract and notified me that I would have to replace the modem in my system or it would stop working. This was at the height of the supply-chain crisis and there was a long waiting list for any replacement modems, with wifi cards (that used your home internet rather than a cellular connection) completely sold out for most of a year.

There are good reasons to connect rooftop solar arrays to the internet – it's not just so that Solaredge can enshittify my service. Solar arrays that coordinate with the grid can make it much easier and safer to manage a grid that was designed for centralized power production and is being retrofitted for distributed generation, one roof at a time.

But when the imperatives of extraction and efficiency go to war, extraction always wins. After all, the Solaredge system is already in place and solar installers are largely ignorant of, and indifferent to, the reasons that a homeowner might want to directly control and monitor their system via local controls that don't roundtrip through the cloud.

Somewhere in the hindbrain of any prospective solar purchaser is the experience with bricked and enshittified "smart" gadgets, and the knowledge that anything they buy from a cool startup with lots of great ideas for improving production, monitoring, and/or costs poses the risk of having your 20 year investment bricked after just a few years – and, thanks to the extractive imperative, no one will be able to step in and restore your ex-solar array to good working order.

I make the majority of my living from books, which means that my pay is very "lumpy" – I get large sums when I publish a book and very little in between. For many years, I've used these payments to make big purchases, rather than financing them over long periods where I can't predict my income. We've used my book payments to put in solar, then an induction stove, then a battery. We used one to buy out the lease on our EV. And just a month ago, we used the money from my upcoming Enshittification book to put in a heat pump (with enough left over to pay for a pair of long-overdue cataract surgeries, scheduled for the fall).

When we started shopping for heat pumps, it was clear that this was a very exciting sector. First of all, heat pumps are kind of magic, so efficient and effective it's almost surreal. But beyond the basic tech – which has been around since the late 1940s – there is a vast ferment of cool digital features coming from exciting and innovative startups.

By nature, I'm the kid of person who likes these digital features. I started out as a computer programmer, and while I haven't written production code since the previous millennium, I've been in and around the tech industry for my whole adult life. But when it came time to buy a heat-pump – an investment that I expected to last for 20 years or more – there was no way I was going to buy one of these cool new digitally enhanced pumps, no matter how much the reviewers loved them. Sure, they'd work well, but it's precisely because I'm so knowledgeable about high tech that I could see that they would fail very, very badly.

You may think EVs are bullshit, and they are – though there will always be room for some personal vehicles, and it's better for people in transit deserts to drive EVs than gas-guzzlers. You may think rooftop solar is a dead-end and be all-in on utility scale solar (I think we need both, especially given the grid-disrupting extreme climate events on our horizon). But there's still a wide range of cleantech – induction tops, heat pumps, smart thermostats – that are capital intensive, have a long duty cycle, and have good reasons to be digitized and networked.

Take home storage batteries: your utility can push its rate card to your battery every time they change their prices, and your battery can use that information to decide when to let your house tap into the grid, and when to switch over to powering your home with the solar you've stored up during the day. This is a very old and proven pattern in tech: the old Fidonet BBS network used a version of this, with each BBS timing its calls to other nodes to coincide with the cheapest long-distance rates, so that messages for distant systems could be passed on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet

Cleantech is a very dynamic sector, even if its triumphs are largely unheralded. There's a quiet revolution underway in generation, storage and transmission of renewable power, and a complimentary revolution in power-consumption in vehicles and homes:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/12/s-curve/#anything-that-cant-go-on-forever-eventually-stops

But cleantech is too important to leave to the incumbents, who are addicted to enshittification and planned obsolescence. These giant, financialized firms lack the discipline and culture to make products that have the features – and cost savings – to make them appealing to the very wide range of buyers who must transition as soon as possible, for the sake of the very planet.

It's not enough for our policymakers to focus on financing and infrastructure barriers to cleantech adoption. We also need a policy-level response to enshittification.

Ideally, every cleantech device would be designed so that it was impossible to enshittify – which would also make it impossible to brick:

Based on free software (best), or with source code escrowed with a trustee who must release the code if the company enters administration (distant second-best);

All patents in a royalty-free patent-pool (best); or in a trust that will release them into a royalty-free pool if the company enters administration (distant second-best);

No parts-pairing or other DRM permitted (best); or with parts-pairing utilities available to all parties on a reasonable and non-discriminatory basis (distant second-best);

All diagnostic and error codes in the public domain, with all codes in the clear within the device (best); or with decoding utilities available on demand to all comers on a reasonable and non-discriminatory basis (distant second-best).

There's an obvious business objection to this: it will reduce investment in innovative cleantech because investors will perceive these restrictions as limits on the expected profits of their portfolio companies. It's true: these measures are designed to prevent rent-extraction and other enshittificatory practices by cleantech companies, and to the extent that investors are counting on enshittification rents, this might prevent them from investing.

But that has to be balanced against the way that a general prohibition on enshittificatory practices will inspire consumer confidence in innovative and novel cleantech products, because buyers will know that their investments will be protected over the whole expected lifespan of the product, even if the startup goes bust (nearly every startup goes bust). These measures mean that a company with a cool product will have a much larger customer-base to sell to. Those additional sales more than offset the loss of expected revenue from cheating and screwing your customers by twiddling them to death.

There's also an obvious legal objection to this: creating these policies will require a huge amount of action from Congress and the executive branch, a whole whack of new rules and laws to make them happen, and each will attract court-challenges.

That's also true, though it shouldn't stop us from trying to get legal reforms. As a matter of public policy, it's terrible and fucked up that companies can enshittify the things we buy and leave us with no remedy.

However, we don't have to wait for legal reform to make this work. We can take a shortcut with procurement – the things governments buy with public money. The feds, the states and localities buy a lot of cleantech: for public facilities, for public housing, for public use. Prudent public policy dictates that governments should refuse to buy any tech unless it is designed to be enshittification-resistant.

This is an old and honorable tradition in policymaking. Lincoln insisted that the rifles he bought for the Union Army come with interoperable tooling and ammo, for obvious reasons. No one wants to be the Commander in Chief who shows up on the battlefield and says, "Sorry, boys, war's postponed, our sole supplier decided to stop making ammunition."

By creating a market for enshittification-proof cleantech, governments can ensure that the public always has the option of buying an EV that can't be bricked even if the maker goes bust, a heat-pump whose digital features can be replaced or maintained by a third party of your choosing, a solar controller that coordinates with the grid in ways that serve their owners – not the manufacturers' shareholders.

We're going to have to change a lot to survive the coming years. Sure, there's a lot of scary ways that things can go wrong, but there's plenty about our world that should change, and plenty of ways those changes could be for the better. It's not enough for policymakers to focus on ensuring that we can afford to buy whatever badly thought-through, extractive tech the biggest companies want to foist on us – we also need a focus on making cleantech fit for purpose, truly smart, reliable and resilient.

Support me this summer on the Clarion Write-A-Thon and help raise money for the Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers' Workshop!

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/06/26/unplanned-obsolescence/#better-micetraps

Image: 臺灣古寫真上色 (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raid_on_Kagi_City_1945.jpg

Grendelkhan (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ground_mounted_solar_panels.gk.jpg

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

[supertech-electric]

Electric Scooter Manufacturing Company - Supertech Ev

One of the leading companies in the electrical vehicle world, Supertech Ev is an example of sustainable business practices and forward-thinking innovation when it comes to manufacturing electric scooters. As a best electric scooter manufacturing company is leading the way in the creation of smart electric scooters, combining modern technology with an unwavering dedication to environmental responsibility. Our electric scooters are more than just a means of transportation; we have a beautiful combination of style and environmental awareness. Being a major industry in the market, We transforms the way that people think about urban transportation. It provides an outlook on how advanced technology will combine with a commitment to environmentally friendly transportation, addressing today's serious environmental sustainability issues.

In need of a pocket-friendly Electric Scooter in India? Your solution is here. Contact us for more information. Contact Number :- +91-9138363638

[evehiclesindia]

Top E Scooter Manufacturer - Supertech Ev

Greetings from Supertech, the intersection of innovation and asphalt! As one of the Top E Scooter manufacturer, we are not simply creating scooters; we mold experiences on two wheels. Being the Best E-Scooter Manufacturer is a legacy at Supertech, not just a catchphrase. We are an unrivaled Electric Scooter Manufacturer, offering smooth, effective rides that transform how people move around town. When you choose Supertech, you're adopting a lifestyle where long-term viability, style, and the excitement of the ride come together. You're not simply buying a scooter. Accompany the leading E -scooter manufacturer on their adventure as we jointly ride into the future!

[quixoticanarchy]

Finished reading Cobalt Red by Siddharth Kara and he does a good job showing how the cobalt supply chain is inextricable from incredible human suffering, near-slavery, rampant exploitation, environmental devastation, and child labor. And it’s very clear that no promise a tech or battery manufacturer makes that their supply chain is clean means literally anything bc industrially and artisanally mined cobalt are mixed into the same supply untraceably. And the book also covers the fact that cobalt supplies are finite and when the DRC’s cobalt is exhausted the industry will move elsewhere, rinse and repeat, and the people in the Congo will be left with the ongoing and unremediated -maybe irremediable - damage. All of this so that we can have smartphones, electric vehicles, iPads, electric scooters, almost anything with a rechargeable battery.

It’s also clear that the tech and battery industries are interested in good PR and making empty statements about human rights when they should be taking responsibility for the working conditions of small-scale miners (and minors) dying at the bottom of their supply chains. What Kara doesn’t really address is the demand side of this equation, not just the demand by companies whose products use cobalt-containing batteries but also the consumers sustaining that demand, who buy every new smartphone and eagerly pin their hopes on electric vehicles to let us keep our car-dependent world without the fossil fuel guilt. The book takes it for granted that cobalt will be required in high quantities for consumer electronics and for “green” tech, and to some extent this is true - as in, none of those demands or uses will cease overnight and in the meantime we should worry about how to address industrial and business practices and government corruption in order to treat Congolese miners as human beings.

But it feels incomplete without also asking questions like: should that demand continue? Can it? Do we need this many devices? What costs are acceptable? Can we really have our cake (smartphones, EVs, etc) and eat it too (slavery-free, non-exploitative supply chains that don’t kill the people at the bottom and lay waste to the environment)? What if - as the book would seem to suggest - we really cannot? If one goal of the book is for people to realize what conditions underlie the extraction of cobalt, what action is then incumbent upon us? Personal consumer choice will not undo all this harm, but it is a necessary step in rethinking or attempting other ways to live. Is it a right to have a smartphone, a new one every year or two, if it comes at the price of other people’s human rights? At what point do we say that it is not an acceptable cost that the extractive industries are perpetuating neocolonialism and near-slavery in order that we should have comfortable lives?

We know we have to stop relying on fossil fuels or we’ll burn down the planet (to a greater degree than is already locked in) but the “green energy transition” is not clean at all. Capitalism seeks the lowest price for labor and the highest profits; obviously these extractive relationships owe a lot of their horror to being conducted in a capitalist milieu. But even thinking about, say, a socialist world instead, if it aspires to still provide smartphones and electric vehicles en masse and maintain the comforts and conveniences of the “Western” lifestyle then we would still be relying on massive amounts of resource extraction with no guarantee of less suffering. The devices are themselves part of the problem. The demand for them and the extent to which “modern” life in “developed” countries relies upon them is part of the problem. It is unsustainable. It is built on blood and it makes a mockery of purported values of dignity, equality, and human rights. The lives of Congolese cobalt miners are tied to how we in the “developed” or colonizer countries live and consume. I do not think their lives will change substantially unless ours do.

[marzipanandminutiae]

By the way, just like a PSA in case anyone else is unaware of this as I was – DO NOT KEEP ELECTRONIC BIKES AND SCOOTERS INSIDE

My apartment is now completely uninhabitable, and at least one of my housemates lost pretty much all of their possessions, because an ebike’s battery exploded. Apparently this is quite common, and the manufacturer obviously doesn’t publicize the risk a great deal at all.

Just. Don’t let this happen to you. Don’t let this happen to the people you live with. thankfully we’re all safe, and it could’ve been much worse, but. I would not wish this on anyone

[elesco1]

Go Green and Save Money: How the Lithium Electric Scooter Transforms Your Daily Commute

In today's fast-paced environment, finding effective and cheap mobility solutions is crucial. Our daily lives include a large amount of commuting, therefore the need for affordable and ecologically sustainable choices has never been greater. Enter the lithium electric scooter, a ground-breaking invention that promises to transform your everyday commute while also saving you money and promoting a more environmentally friendly future. If you are thinking about buying Lithium Electric Scooter. Elesco is the best option for you. We believe that service and performance make our electric scooters the lions of the jungle of electric vehicles.

The Rise of Electric Scooters

In recent years, electric scooters have become incredibly popular, and for good reason. These sleek and stylish two-wheelers offer a host of benefits that traditional vehicles simply can't match. They are a major role in the trend towards sustainable mobility because they have no emissions, making them a greener option than gas-guzzling cars and motorcycles. The Lithium Electric Scooter takes this commitment to the next level with its advanced technology and exceptional performance.

Unleashing the Power of Lithium

Modern lithium battery technology is one of the Lithium Electric Scooter's standout qualities. Lithium batteries with higher energy densities are known for their propensity to charge more quickly. Lithium batteries are considerably lighter than classic lead-acid batteries, which enables higher efficiency and a longer operating range. This means you can enjoy longer rides without worrying about constantly recharging your scooter. Because our lithium electric scooter is good for your daily commute.

Efficient and Cost-Effective Commuting

Money and time are critical factors when it comes to commuting. The Lithium Battery Scooter offers a compelling solution to both of these concerns. Its electric motor provides a smooth and quiet ride, allowing you to navigate through traffic effortlessly. You can move through crowded city streets with ease and get where you're going more quickly than ever because of its compact size and agility.

When compared to more common vehicles like cars or motorbikes, electric scooters are substantially cheaper to operate. Moreover, the cost savings associated with owning a Lithium Electric Scooter are remarkable. With electricity prices typically lower than the cost of gasoline, you can significantly reduce your daily commuting expenses. Additionally, the reduced maintenance requirements and fewer moving parts of an electric scooter contribute to additional long-term savings.

Safety First: Enhanced Features and Technology

The electric scooter succeeds wonderfully in this area as well. When it comes to mobility, safety is always the top priority. The scooter provides a safe and visible ride, especially in low light, thanks to its extensive security features, which include anti-lock braking systems and brilliant LED lights. Additionally, the scooter's ergonomic design and comfortable seating provide an optimal riding experience, reducing fatigue during long commutes.

Embracing the Future of Transportation

The Lithium Electric Scooter represents more than just a means of getting from point A to point B. It embodies a shift towards a greener and more sustainable future. By choosing an electric scooter, you actively contribute to reducing carbon emissions and combating air pollution. Furthermore, the growing infrastructure to support electric vehicles, including charging stations and dedicated lanes, makes the Lithium Electric Scooter an increasingly viable and convenient option for daily commuters.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Lithium Electric Scooter offers a compelling proposition for anyone seeking a greener, more economical, and more efficient mode of transportation. This two-wheeled marvel is ready to change the way you commute because to its cutting-edge lithium battery technology, outstanding performance, and cost-saving features. Embrace the future of transportation and make a positive impact on the environment while saving money. Say goodbye to traffic jams, exorbitant fuel costs, and harmful emissions. Choose the Lithium Electric Scooter and revolutionize your daily commute today. You can also check our Electric Scooty. Tap Here

Source From:- https://bit.ly/3IJo46x

[ceeonindia321]

E Rickshaw Manufacturers And Suppliers At Best Price In India | Ceeon India

Ceeon India e rickshaw manufacturers and suppliers at best price in India. We are offering electric three wheeler and electric two wheelers manufacturers in India. Eco-friendly and affordable with sustainable transportation that's also fun. Top battery operated electric vehicle manufacturers company in India.