#An Entitled Couple's
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
An Entitled Couple's Airline Dispute Leads To A Stand Off With Police - Lawful Eye
youtube
In this episode of Lawful Eye, we witness a shocking airport fight with police that turns into a chaotic brawl. A couple who wanted a refund for their flight at the Spirit Airline ticket counter got into a heated argument with the staff and then tried to go behind the counter.
An officer who was trying to calm them down ended up in a violent struggle with the angry man, while his partner tried to restrain the woman. The fight escalated as more officers and bystanders got involved, and the whole scene was captured on camera. Watch how the police handled this situation and what happened to the couple afterward.
This incident took place on June 27, 2023, at the Orlando International Airport, a city best known for tourism. The couple was reportedly upset about a $90 refund that they claimed they were entitled to. They were arrested and charged with battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting arrest with violence, and trespassing.
So tune in and watch the complete video to see what happens with the couple & why were they behaving like this.
If you enjoyed this video, please like, share, and subscribe to Lawful Eye, where we bring you the most intense and dramatic videos of arrests and crime stories from around the world. We also provide you with tips and insights on how to protect yourself and your loved ones from criminal violence, based on the principles of Active Self Protection.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Watch More of My Videos And Don't forget to "Like & Subscribe" & Also please click on the 🔔 Bell Icon, so you never miss any updates! 💟 ⬇️ 🔹🔹🔹
⭐ Please Subscribe to My Channel: 👇👇
👉👉 www.youtube.com/@RealLawfulEye
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
👉👉 Request to watch top 3 videos of my channel ..... 👇👇
✅ Routine Traffic Stop Turns Into $2 Million Dollar Bust
🎬 https://youtu.be/87RTwxPsT6w?si=b4l9_0xGgSpN7xTU
✅ A Simple Welfare Check Takes an Unexpected Turn
🎬 https://youtu.be/sQgRguzp8_U?si=HFoOzasuC1OPCFek
✅ An Entitled Couple's Airline Dispute Leads To A Stand Off With Police
🎬 https://youtu.be/tsZIDctIEyg?si=L31imxcvj018l--q
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Bodycam: Captures Airport Customer Putting Orlando Police Officer in Chokehold | Lawful Eye
#crime #Arrest #lawfuleye #airportarrest #Police #BodyCamera #SelfDefense #ActiveSelfProtection #crimestory #airportarrest #cops #lawenforcement #reality #policebodycam #airportnews #fightscene
TOPICS COVERED IN THIS VIDEO:
Airport fight with police
Airport fight video
Viral airport fight in Orlando
Viral airport fight bodycam
Airport fight full video
Lawful Eye Bodycam arrest videos
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
( 👉👉 NOTE : ⚠️FAIR USE DISCLAIMER: .... 👇👇
We use images and content in accordance with the YouTube Fair Use copyright guidelines • Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. )
💖Let us know your comments in the comment section💖
🔔Make sure you are subscribed to the channel🔔
🖤Thanks for watching till the end🖤
VIDEO TAGE:
#police body cam#police body cam arrest#police body cam entitled#Lawful Eye#An Entitled Couple's Airline Dispute Leads To A Stand Off With Police#An Entitled Couple's#Airline Dispute Leads#A Stand Off With Police#an entitled couple's airline dispute leads to a stand off with police#news#abc news live#abc news#law and crime network#police activity#law and crime#first time watching#southwest airlines#lawful eye#true crime short#court#trials#true crime stories#Youtube
0 notes
Text
Finding out that ALL of my works, including those that are on-going and some that were deleted, have been uploaded to some random "Archive" without my information or consent is definitely not how I wanted my day to go
#respectfully what the fuck#currently wasting my lunch break on my 10hr work day to figure out how many of my fics are on there#only to realise it's probably all of them#the entitlement of some people is bewildering#and that's only a couples days after the whole AI scraping thing#like there’s no respect for ao3 authors. none
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
ashes to ashes.
a short comic about the day Ash was born.
Ash's story
Red and Wolf's story
notes:
--
all my other comics
store
#we love a family with a storied history of loving women and committing mass murder#wolf is a couple years older than she was in her original comic but still just as smitten with red#i dont intend on making it a habit to connect my comics together into a shared universe#but i did make ash with the internal headcanon that she was the kid of red and wolf#if only to justify elements of her design#the gravity defying hair - the control over fire - the commitment to a black/white/red colour scheme#i wont be doing a backstory for snow btw since she's kind of just. a human being who grew up very entitled and spoiled#although maybe during her undead journey she unknowingly comes across her mothers-in-law in the mountains#(they like to live in remote snowy areas)#red would like her#thats all!#thank you for reading#sapphic art#comic art#stillindigo art#hearteaters#stillindigo comics
3K notes
·
View notes
Note
If I remember correctly you created Machete around 2007-2008. But when did you create Vasco? (I'm sorry of this has been asked before, I couldn't find anything)
First finished pictures of Vasco are from 2018, but even before that I had been thinking it would be interesting if Machete had had one (1) romantic relationship in his youth before he was ordained. I just didn't have a name and design for him yet.
In the earliest sketches of Vasco, he first looked a little bit like a bordercollie, then like a spaniel or a setter. He had a darker color palette as well, sort of chestnut brown with white markings, but combined with the overpowering whiteness of Machete he looked kind of impassionate and drab, so I kept making him warmer and lighter until he became the golden boy he is today. The name came later, I just thought Vasco sounded friendly and charismatic. (Also the old finnish word 'vaski' means brass and bronze, and even if it's a tedious connection and doesn't factor into their canon at all, it felt too fitting to me personally and I had to go with it).
#answered#anonymous#he was meant to be an absent character#one who appeared only in a couple of flashbacks or dreams#but the fact he used to be there and then wasn't was something that still influenced Machete#how he viewed love and other people and himself#Vasco wasn't supposed to show up again but he sort of elbowed himself back into the story and into a central position just last summer#really switched up things you could say#I originally imagined him to be more cocky and entitled and thrill seeking#but he mellowed out pretty instantly#I like him a lot better as a genuinely good and sincere person#maybe partially because you wouldn't expect someone that coddled and spoiled to have a sense of empathy and a working moral compass?
339 notes
·
View notes
Text
She. Was. There. She was in Genosha during the massacre. She saw SO many die because people hated and feared them. She held the damaged body of a loved one in her arms till dawn.
Gotta stop seeing everything through the friggin’ lenses of a ship or another. There is more to a character and their choices than who you want to see them smooch with.
Stop it! Some of you out there really don’t deserve Rogue.
#rogue#x men 97#x men ‘97#anna marie#anna marie darkholme#gambit#yes#I am looking at some of you loud people#romy#shippers#you know who you are#stop dragging this ship down#these two characters deserve better#not going to lie it’s so difficult to even interract witj anything related to the ship because of a couple of really loud and entitled fans#there I said it
282 notes
·
View notes
Text
"If compensation were forbidden, surrogacy would endure the same fate as kidney transplants, where shortages and delays abound. This may be what Lahl wants, but it is hard to imagine a worse model: Because of existing laws prohibiting compensation, 100,000 Americans languish on kidney transplant waiting lists, and 4,000 Americans die annually as they wait for a kidney, despite nearly everyone having a kidney they could donate."
False equivalence. People NEED a kidney to live a healthy life. People don't NEED to have biological offspring. And surrogacy is a service that only women can provide, and women already donate more organs then men do.
By Vanessa Brown Calder | From the March 2025 issue
Evelyn and Will Clark met after college through mutual friends. Their shared sense of humor sparked a friendship that blossomed, and "it just felt meant to be, with no question that it was right and the timing was perfect for both of us," Evelyn recalled.
The Clarks were involved at their church, and they dreamed of raising a family together in the town where Will grew up and where they met. Everything was falling into place: After dating for less than a year, they got engaged, and four months later they were married. They found a home in a safe neighborhood with great schools, close to relatives.
Unbeknownst to the Clarks, the road to expanding their family would be a long and grueling one—a roller coaster of heartbreak, hope, and medical intervention. Realizing their dream would require the help of a series of specialists, plus a woman who started out as a perfect stranger.
Around four years into marriage, frustrated by her inability to conceive, Evelyn submitted to a battery of invasive and uncomfortable fertility tests. Sometimes it is relatively simple to treat fertility issues. But when it is not, the results of these tests can crush patients. Unfortunately, Evelyn's diagnosis revealed an issue impossible to fix. A brusque radiologist delivered the news that she had a congenital abnormality—a unicornuate, or partial, uterus.
Would she ever be able to have children, she wondered? It's possible, he replied, but perhaps "half" as many as your friends do. Then he laughed.
The sting of the doctor's joke remains fixed in her memory years later. In a follow-up conversation with her reproductive endocrinologist, the news got worse: Her uterine abnormality meant not only that becoming pregnant would be difficult, but that any given pregnancy had just a 28 percent likelihood of ending with a live baby. She was at higher risk of miscarriage and stillbirth, but also of ectopic pregnancy—a potentially lethal condition where an embryo implants outside of the uterus.
This unnerving possibility would stop many women from trying to conceive altogether. Yet even with the deck stacked against her, Evelyn was committed to finding a way. Although fertility treatment could not resolve the risks attendant to a partial uterus, it could increase Evelyn's chances of conceiving. "I'm not brave by nature," Evelyn ventures. But she was determined.
IVF Under the Microscope
A couple years ago, fertility treatments weren't on the public policy radar. The use and existence of reproductive technologies were largely taken for granted. That changed after the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision kicked off a wave of stricter abortion laws at the state level. The Supreme Court of Alabama ruled that embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF) were legally children, halting fertility treatment for some women in the state and catapulting the topic into the national spotlight.
Although Alabama's Legislature hurriedly passed legislation granting patients and medical providers immunity from prosecution, IVF became a live policy issue overnight. Pro-life commentators and research analysts quickly began to wade into the debate.
IVF joins human eggs and sperm in a lab and transfers the resulting embryo back to the patient in hopes of a successful pregnancy. It is the most effective way for patients to overcome a varied list of male and female fertility issues, from damaged fallopian tubes to low sperm motility, and it produces about 97,000 U.S. births annually.
Despite these benefits, critics have laid out an expansive list of concerns. These range from anxieties about separating procreation from the marital act to exaggerated worries about medical risks. But for pro-lifers, the leading fear is that doctors are discarding or indefinitely freezing unborn children. As then-Rep. Matt Rosendale (R–Mont.) put it, "If you believe that life begins at conception…there is no difference between an abortion and the destruction of an IVF embryo."
It is true that IVF sometimes creates extra embryos that are not transferred back to the patient. At the outset, patients and doctors don't know how many embryos will develop successfully (two-thirds of embryos' development arrests) or how many embryo transfers will be required to produce a live birth for an individual patient. Beginning the process with more embryos increases the likelihood of success.
Such critics downplay how much the creation of human life is an inefficient process, whether it happens inside or outside the body. Conventional conception results in significant embryo loss, and the body regularly and naturally discards embryos in the process of trying to create life. Research suggests around 70 percent of conventional human conceptions do not survive to live birth, which makes IVF more like conventional reproduction than IVF critics care to admit.
President Donald Trump says he does not subscribe to his right flank's more extreme views on this topic. Indeed, he promised during the campaign that the "government will pay" or "your insurance company will be required to pay" for all IVF treatment costs—proposals that pose their own problems, including high costs and unintended incentives for would-be parents to delay childbearing.
Yet despite Trump's embrace of reproductive technology, fertility treatment feels fraught today in a way that it didn't one year ago. IVF is a fresh target for activists emboldened by a major win on abortion. Since states will continue to set new abortion policy in the coming years, there will be many natural openings for policies that limit fertility treatments.
But when Evelyn began pursuing treatment several years ago, the political outlook was simpler. So instead of worrying about political complexities, she steadied herself and then launched headlong into a series of treatments with increasing levels of invasiveness, cost, and corresponding likelihood of success.
Fertility doctors often initially run patients through a course of intrauterine insemination, or IUIs, which have a low success rate of 5 percent to 15 percent. The thinking is that sometimes these procedures work, and the invasiveness of the process is so much lower than IVF that if it does work, patients have saved themselves some pain, time, and money.
But IUIs often don't work. If patients grow tired of disappointment after several rounds of treatment over multiple months, the next step is IVF, which has higher odds of success—25 percent to 50 percent per cycle for women 40 and under. After several failed rounds of IUI, Evelyn's doctor recommended IVF.
IVF is a complex, absorbing, and time-sensitive process, and it's taxing for the patient: daily injections and medications, regular appointments, reading consent forms, making decisions, and generally staying informed about a complex regimen.
Evelyn's years of fertility treatment were rewarded with two healthy babies—an incredible success. But that success wasn't without grave risk to her personally or to the babies themselves. Both pregnancies were high-risk, and in each pregnancy she developed gestational diabetes and hypertension. The latter can lead to a variety of complications, including preterm birth, poor fetal growth, and stillbirth.
With Evelyn's second pregnancy, the fetus's movement slowed so much in the third trimester that it required constant monitoring. At delivery, the baby's umbilical cord was triple wrapped around its neck; the girl was lucky to be alive.
Evelyn's doctor told her that, in light of her history, it was not safe for her to get pregnant and carry a baby again. Although she'd gambled twice, the odds were never in her favor and now looked much worse.
But the feeling that her family wasn't complete continued to nag at Evelyn. Being a mother, she felt, was her calling and purpose. After careful consideration, research, and discussion, Evelyn felt called to move forward with gestational surrogacy, by far the most common form of surrogacy today.
Surrogacy in the Courtroom
Surrogacy initially burst into the popular consciousness with the Baby M custody dispute of the late '80s. In that case, the genetic surrogate, Mary Beth Whitehead, initially relinquished her rights to the baby but then sensationally threatened the intended parents and kidnapped Baby M for nearly three months.
Following trial and appeal, the courts gave Baby M's intended parents custody, with Whitehead awarded visitation rights. In the end, the grown-up child legally terminated Whitehead's parental rights, stating that she loved and was happy with the intended parents who raised her.
Since then, reproductive technology has improved so much that modern-day surrogacy is categorically different from the technology at the center of the Baby M case. While Baby M was genetically related to the surrogate who carried her, gestational surrogacy, where the gestational carrier is not related to the child, is today's norm. In this type of surrogacy, IVF is used to produce embryos, usually using the intended parents' genetic material. This gives couples an opportunity to have genetically related children while bypassing obstacles that make it difficult or impossible to conceive.
Despite its value to these parents, gestational surrogacy has its own cadre of detractors. For critics on the political right, all the usual objections to IVF apply, with additional concerns besides. An article by Carmel Richardson in Compact hints that commercial surrogacy constitutes "baby selling," and characterizes the American approach to surrogacy as irresponsibly laissez faire. In First Things, Catholic University of America professor Michael Hanby criticized surrogacy as one component of "the conception machine" that must be resisted in a dystopian "brave new world."
Meanwhile, the conservative Heritage Foundation alleges that surrogacy harms women and children. Internationally, Pope Francis describes the practice as "deplorable" and "based on exploitation." Conservative critics have also implied that surrogate pregnancies are frequently terminated, referencing sensational reporting and defying all logic.
Although the political left has recently been more restrained on the topic, "exploitation" is a common refrain from liberal critics as well. Some critics argue that surrogacy "extend[s] the oppressive logic of the market to its farthest and final frontier." Prominent feminists such as Gloria Steinem vocally oppose commercial surrogacy on grounds that it is coercive for low-income women and poses serious risks, and feminist icon Margaret Atwood's popular book The Handmaid's Tale (and associated TV drama) depicts surrogacy as a nonconsensual nightmare.
Yet American surrogacy is nothing like the Brave New World of the right or The Handmaid's Tale of the left, and current research does not support critics' views. Instead, surrogacy is voluntary, gestational carriers are well-compensated to the tune of $30,000 to $60,000 personally, and the vast majority of carriers have their own legal representation during the process. Gestational carriers also report undergoing medical and psychological screenings, during which they are informed of the possible risks.
Gestational carriers typically have positive long-term psychological outcomes—and although pregnancy and fertility treatment are not risk-free, medical outcomes for gestational carriers resemble outcomes for the general population of women using IVF. Children resulting from surrogacy generally do well from a psychological and medical perspective.
If surrogates feel exploited by the process, the research doesn't show that. Instead, gestational carriers often experience a sense of self-worth and achievement following the process; there is little evidence of postsurrogacy regret, and many surrogates would consider carrying again. A long-term study that followed gestational and genetic surrogates in the U.K. found that no surrogates expressed regret about their involvement in surrogacy 10 years after the birth of a child. A separate survey showed 83 percent of gestational carriers in California said they would consider becoming a gestational carrier again.
The Clarks' own experience with surrogacy is a far cry from the cynically transactional picture painted by critics. Following the completion of another IVF cycle, Evelyn's clinic matched her with the person she calls her "angel on earth," Sarah Schneider. (All the names of the families are pseudonyms.) In a phone call, Evelyn's nurse noted Sarah's "pure intentions"—interviews, research, and nonscientific surveys find that gestational carriers are commonly motivated by altruism—and the nurse provided Evelyn with Sarah's email address so she could reach out for an initial conversation.
Following an introductory call where the women shared their histories and hopes for the future, and following a dinner date that included Evelyn, Will, Sarah, and Sarah's husband, the Clarks and Schneiders decided it made sense to move forward. "We felt like old friends and honestly everything just felt right," Sarah says. That's when the start of the many legal, medical, psychological, and insurance hurdles began.
While gestational surrogacy can be miraculous, it is by no means easy. IVF is complex, and gestational surrogacy increases the complexity by leaps and bounds, as it adds an entirely new set of legal, financial, medical, and psychological requirements for both intended parents and gestational carrier.
If IVF feels like a part-time job, navigating gestational surrogacy is like a full-time one. The requirements for the Clarks and Schneiders included individual psychological assessments, as well as group counseling, where they ran through every possible scenario, including how they would feel if Sarah lost the baby during pregnancy or delivery.
The legal process was similarly structured to cover every possible contingency. The Clarks paid for the Schneiders to have their own counsel, which is common. Then, together and separately, the couples considered potentially thorny hypotheticals, including how many embryos Sarah was willing to transfer and under what circumstance all parties would be unwilling or willing to terminate the pregnancy. (For such meticulously planned and desperately hoped-for pregnancies, this scenario is vanishingly rare.)
Alongside these sensitive questions, the Clarks and Schneiders worked through financial questions about compensation in case of bed rest, compensation for house cleaning, and even compensation for major medical issues, should these needs result from pregnancy or delivery. Intended parents also typically cover the cost of agency fees, legal fees, IVF, health insurance, and other miscellaneous expenses related to the pregnancy (clothing, travel, lodging, and more), and it is these costs that lead to the eye-popping "all-in" cost for intended parents of $100,000 to $225,000.
Despite the enormous financial cost, and although the Clarks covered what economists call the "opportunity cost" of Sarah's time and the risks she was voluntarily taking, they knew that what Sarah gave them was a gift. And although money would change hands in the process, it would not change the moral case for their joint project. As Evelyn put it, "You know, the compensation was such a small part of it. After we signed the contracts, we never spoke of it again."
Baby Bobbie
Although compensation was not a central focal point for the Clarks and Schneiders, compensation is a major sticking point for critics of surrogacy in the U.S. and elsewhere. Various countries—including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand—have made compensated surrogacy illegal while allowing uncompensated surrogacy.
In the U.S., most surrogacy is compensated, and gestational carriers and intended parents are both made better off under voluntary compensated surrogacy arrangements. In a curious paradox, critics characterize surrogacy as "exploitative" but are eager to outlaw the payments that cover gestational surrogates' time, efforts, and voluntarily taken risks, even though outlawing payment would make gestational carriers objectively worse off.
Outspoken antisurrogacy advocates, such as Jennifer Lahl, think compensating surrogates is harmful and should be illegal in the U.S. and around the world. Lahl founded The Center for Bioethics and Culture Network and is part of an international campaign to ban commercial surrogacy, though she maintains that ultimately all types of surrogacy—compensated or not—are unethical.
Lahl sees parallels between surrogacy and organ donation, where policy prohibits compensation for organ donors, and she believes organ donation policy provides useful insights for third-party reproduction. She has written that "organ donation should be motivated by the desire to freely give a gift—not by the lure of financial incentives," and she feels it would be best if gestational surrogacy followed suit.
If compensation were forbidden, surrogacy would endure the same fate as kidney transplants, where shortages and delays abound. This may be what Lahl wants, but it is hard to imagine a worse model: Because of existing laws prohibiting compensation, 100,000 Americans languish on kidney transplant waiting lists, and 4,000 Americans die annually as they wait for a kidney, despite nearly everyone having a kidney they could donate.
Prohibiting compensated surrogacy would be similarly tragic, forcing intended parents to endure agonizing and futile waits, pushing intended parents to look for surrogacy services in riskier contexts, and leaving many couples ultimately unsuccessful at expanding their families. Thousands fewer babies would be born in the U.S. annually.
Compensation helps efficiently allocate resources, provides incentives for participation, effectively signals a need, and ensures participants are treated fairly. These benefits are most important when human life is on the line.
Fortunately, the Clarks were not living under Lahl and other critics' policy prescriptions. Evelyn had two embryos left for transfer—the Clarks' last hope. They agreed to transfer both at once, and one took.
As the pregnancy progressed, Sarah messaged Evelyn several times daily to ease her nerves by letting her know that the baby was moving and wiggly. The "gratitude overrode the anxiety because I was so grateful for every month and every milestone," says Evelyn. Evelyn had full trust in Sarah, and Evelyn, Will, Sarah, and Sarah's husband attended each of the many fertility and prenatal appointments together—two grown men and two women huddled close in each small exam room.
The families lived three hours apart, so attending all those appointments together was a logistical feat. Toward the end of the pregnancy, the Schneiders began driving to doctor's appointments in the city where the Clarks lived and she would deliver. Sarah moved in with her sister for the last 10 days of the pregnancy to be closer to the hospital.
Last August,Baby Bobbie arrived perfect and healthy at 38.5 weeks and 7 pounds, 8 ounces. Before delivery, Sarah told Evelyn she couldn't wait to see her face the first time Evelyn held him. As Evelyn described it, when Bobbie arrived, the two women looked at each other as though to say, "We did it. He's here."
"The delivery itself couldn't have been more perfect," Sarah says. "He came pretty fast and it was so surreal and special and spiritual and just honestly so beautiful."
It's been a decade since the Clarks first set out to expand their family, and today they have three rosy-cheeked children to show for it. "I spent 10 years trying to get my babies here," Evelyn recalls, tucked into a recliner with her baby snuggled close in her living room. "But I felt led and supported by God the entire way. And Sarah felt supported by God the same as I did."
It is hard to imagine anyone taking issue with the family that Evelyn and Will created with the help of a generous stranger. It might be an unusual story for two families to be knit together this way, but that doesn't make it less heartfelt.
The Schneiders have returned to their former lives, but the two families stay connected through calls, texts, and pictures. In September, they joined the Clarks for Bobbie's baby blessing, a special religious rite of passage held in the Clarks' backyard. The happy family of five was surrounded by the people closest and most important to them—a group that now includes Sarah and her family.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Love, Money, and Surrogacy."
youtube
#IVF with just the couple doesn't exploit another woman with no generic link to the kid#Surrogacy is linked to an increase in pregancy complications#In a world with so many children without families spending so much money to have biological offspring is unethical#Just adopt#No one is entitled to biological offspring#The focus of the story already managed to have 2 children through IVF but still used a surrogate to have a third child#Am I the only one wondering if the two kids from IVF were girls at least one was and she wanted to try for a boy?
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
Honestly, the more I look into mxtx's reasons for not writing side couples (aside from mobishang), the more based I think she is
#mdzs#tgcf#svsss#her “i cant imagine a world where everyone is gay” comment wouldn't have been homophobic if thats what she actually said (it isn’t)#not even all queer people are gay (bi gal speaking 👋)#but what she said was more along the lines of “i cant imagine a world where every man is in a bl relationship”#which is cool because it results in a lot of her characters not being in romantic relationships at all and being content in their lives#which is pretty rare in media#i simply think a person who acknowledges gay people and writes queer relationships saying “not everything is gay” is fundamentally different#than someone who refuses to interact with queer art at all saying it#i also think mxtx is entitled to write as many intense and undefined relationships as she wants#I'd wrather she write one good couple than a thousand mediocre ones#one comment i found interesting was where she said something along the lines of not wanting to make everything romantic because#people will tend to reduce nuance and personal motivations to whats good for the relationship#which caught my attention cuz thats exactly what happened to beefleaf in the fandom#also mxtx said she's fine with shipping and headcanons so long as you dont get mad at her when its not canon
32 notes
·
View notes
Text
Can empaths shut the fuck up
#.txt#sorry if tags are salty I ran out of meds a couple days ago#‘ ur a psychic u can’t say anything!! ‘ yes i can and empaths suck ass#u aren’t an empath ur a whiny bitch who thinks they’re entitled to help unassuming people#tagging this as npd bc I have npd and also this is abt a post I saw in the tags#godkin#divinekin#deitykin#actually god#actually divine#deity kin#bc I’m the god of chaos and this ALSO applies to ya’ll#actually npd#npd safe#npd thoughts#npd#npd posting#npd things#actually narcissistic#cluster b#narcissistic personality disorder#anti empath
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hellaverse lesbian discourse is so annoying because like-
We have several female characters who haven't even been introduced yet or have only one line. Molly, Crymini, Helsa, Zeezi, Clara and Odette. Even Sera, Emily, Glitz or Glam. There is plenty of potential for at least some of them to be lesbians.
But no, let's decide to focus on the women who are implied to be bisexual (Velvette, Carmilla and Rosie) or homophobic and straight. (Lute) Don't get even get me started on Barbie Wire. THAT'S the lesbian representation you guys want from a character? A groomer?
I guess it only counts when its a character you like, huh?
#yes i headcanon rosie carmilla and velvette as lesbians#yes i headcanon sera and emily as a lesbian couple (on top of the former being ace)#hazbin hotel#helluva boss#hellaverse#annoying fandom#entitled fandom#i don't see anyone complaining about there being only 3 canon ace characters#with 2 of them being villains
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
Y’all thinking about an older Ares has RUINED me
#hyrule warriors#hw link#kheprri rambling#fucked by the ‘perfect hero’ treatment and is a little hit jaded and scruffy and i am INSANE FOR IT#he does not cope well and i love that for him#obsessed with him. been thinking about him for a couple months now for my wargod au and yall i cannot stop#volga gets the treatment too but its slightly less noticeable coz hes a dragon#also sorry about there being nothing going on. every time i want to start on something i get hit by just utter pain and cant focus#so ive just been playing games and sleeping trying to get through it lol#but that also gave me a lot of thinking time for the aus. especially the main one (and this one obv)#also sorry if u dont vibe with the headcanon/au. hes far from being a dick or entitled hes just tired of being perfect for others—#—and just wants to live in peace with his dragon bf lmao#2024+ is the era of khep(me) forcing myself to draw facial hair because ive always been afraid of not doing it right#actually i love drawinf facial hair and all hair in general tbh im just horrified of people being like ‘lol ur wrong die’ XD#anyways sorry. rambling. too many brain thoughts not enough outlets for#will be posting the mistflier species sheet wip on kofi eventually i just wanna type the words out to make it more legible#it IS still a wip and thats why its gonna be going on kofi until its finished#<- and also coz its tailnrr related
20 notes
·
View notes
Note
A bit dark, but uh, what would happen if one of you died? How would the other react?
im not really the type to want to protect anyone but now if germany was in danger i would absolutely make sure he would survive instead of accidentally saving him with the pictonians. since if he dies that means hes leaving me!!!!!!!!!! D:
germanys honest reaction would be the blog banner lawl
#itager#gerita#aph germany#aph italy#hws germany#hws italy#hetalia#aph#hws#draws#robooty draws#gay shit#yaoi#yeah i think italy didnt romantically like germany at all during paint it white lol#i think actually italy isnt in love with germany for like all of animated hetalia#this blog takes place a million years in the future because even in present day i think theyve been dating like max a couple years#italy takes a while to realize hes genuinely in gays with germy kun#because he did not give a fuck when germy died in paint it white he needed moar time to grow his feeling of entitlement to germany#he really loves germany by the time they get together tho cuz they take forever and he would never cheat on him bc hes had time to fully#flesh out his feeling too bc they took forever and italy would make sure germany would NOT die without him#and germany is germany lol he would literally do anything to protect italy at all times#ask
211 notes
·
View notes
Text
vampire jihyo who's in irene's coven and has a relationship with her (sort of) but keeps going to the rival werewolves' territory to sleep with the leader of the pack nayeon... but of course she pretends she hates nayeon and the entire time she's with her she's huffing and acting as if nayeon's forcing her when in reality she's basically presenting herself as an omega would do
#jihyo would be so smug abt nayeon wanting Her and not an omega#especially because nayeon is the leader of the pack and out of everyone she's the one who really should have an omega#but of course nayeon would feel entitled as well because jihyo has the 'leader' of her coven as a lover and still sleeps with her#does irene sleep with other vampires of their coven... yes. a couple (wenseul).#but jihyo is still irene's and nayeon is taking jihyo from her 🙂↕️#rambling
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
There’s people bashing and insulting Buddie and its fans on the 911onabc’s Instagram page,,, listen, people can like or dislike a ship, but what’s the point of saying that a gay couple would be “disgusting” or “wrong” ??? I’m so upset and it’s not even noon 🙄
#honestly what the fuck#because everyone’s entitled to liking or disliking a ship#but the person saying this shit called themselves queer and then said a gay couple was disgusting ????#‘let them be best friends who like women for god’s sake’ that’s what the post said#buddie#911 fox#911#eddie diaz#evan buckley#911 tv show#evan buck buckley#buck x eddie#buck and eddie#911 abc#911 on abc#911 buddie#buddie 911
71 notes
·
View notes
Text
Would that there was a faithful, accurate adaptation of Dracula so that Jonathan Decker and Alan Seawright could discuss the nontoxic masculinity, healthy friendships, and the BEST MARRIAGE RELATIONSHIP IN FICTIONAL HISTORY but nooo!
#every time they're like 'tell us your favorite movie couples in the comments' I'm just like I wish I could Jono I wish I could#*all* of the men openly cry in this novel#and despite the filter through Seward’s narration it is not actually looked down on#Seward makes comments about manhood and what not but clearly does not think any less of Arthur or Van Helsing or Harker for showing emotion#i know everyone on here is all about the poly thing#and idk how serious that is or if its just for fun or whatever#and it's tumblr so to each their own#but personally the platonic love in this book is so beautiful and refreshing!#healthy loving friendships are so rare in media and it's an important part of nontoxic masculinity too tbh#the fact that the suitor squad all love and support each other and do anything to help Lucy without ever getting jealous or entitled#and don't get me started on how wonderful and amazing Jonathan and Mina are bc I will never stop!#i love this book so much#it's 127 years old why is it better at this stuff than most modern media?#and why can't any of the adaptations get it right?#like it's one thing to be disappointing and inaccurate but it objectively dismantles the themes!#dracula#writing#cinema therapy#jonamina#suitor squad#mina harker#jonathan harker
20 notes
·
View notes
Text
Lots of stuff going on. We did get an offer so we are under contract. Right now we're in the due diligence period where the buyer orders a home inspection and can do other research on the property prior to finalizing things. That happened on Wednesday. No copy of that report yet so no idea what will be requested.
Someone else toured the house on Wednesday night, so still waiting on that feedback. No backup offers exist yet.
The plan is that he's heading out first with a trailer hitched to his truck that will be holding his motorcycle and anything else that can fit in it and along with stuff he doesn't want the movers to move. He's got a cover for truck bed that he's installing today. He'll be flying back to help me drive over because I am an anxious driver and that's honestly cheaper than shipping my car.
My car is a 2017 that had 5K miles on it when I got it. It's got 28K miles on it now so I'll be making up for that lack of wear and tear on it.
We have gotten quotes from a couple of movers. Nothing is set in stone yet for a move date with whoever we end up going with.
We still have stuff to pack. Unfriendly is in the garage at the moment dealing with stuff that's in there. I have to finish packing up my desk, nightstand, dresser, and my bathroom crap that isn't every day bathroom crap. I also need to separate out any things I'm bringing in my car that I don't want the movers to handle, like my records and cassettes and my tourbooks which I'm not sure where they are at the moment in the house. We have boxes in all of the basement closets, and most of the upstairs closets. The master closet we emptied out since that's a walk in and selling point. Blah whatever.
I'm not sure how I want to pack my big hoops. I got some suggestions from one of the hooping groups.
There's other stuff I also need to do like order a backup copy of my car title. Unfriendly didn't see my title in the filing cabinet when he was looking for his vehicle titles but he wasn't specifically looking for it. I also need to return some Amazon crap.
Anyway, this is more of a brain dump so I can see things I need to do haha.
#moving to nm#the initial offer was 25K under our price and we counter offered to 10K under our price and they accepted#they are a retired couple so I'm dreading crazy older folks entitled energy but we'll see
45 notes
·
View notes
Note
Tbf it is pretty common for kids to get crushes on people older than them(not saying I agree that Mikuni had a crush on her when he was a kid) theres nothing wrong with people saying that.
While that does happen, i don't believe that to be the case for mikuni, especially considering her involvement in all of the terrible things both he and his mother had to endure.
In my humble opinion, the only thing he did crush, was his fathers ego. No pun intended. lol.
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/24c725e4ee52420b6bd656f8179a3fa3/4cd0fc2663321b62-9f/s540x810/765289e2650ac98cf509c8194bb93d4367fa8be8.jpg)
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/eb688692d210122f16e1a2ead2458747/4cd0fc2663321b62-e5/s540x810/27570d86982360dd9b1a41f6a518ce97581e3234.jpg)
#honestly I've been itching to make that joke since the speculations started#thanks for the ask anon#also everyone is entitled to their own opinion#this is mine#where i don't believe that to be the case for mikuni for a couple of reasons#not that its an abnormal occurrence in the real world#servamp#servamp manga#mikuni alicein#have a good day :)
26 notes
·
View notes