#(based on stereotypes but i mean they all are)

[satocidal]

Hi Rome! New follower here, and I love the way you write Geto ❤️ He doesn't get the love he deserves!!

Saw your requests were open, and I had an idea for headcanons: what kind of music do you think the JJK guys would be into (Nanami, Suguru, Satoru and Toji in particular) ?

𓂂 ˚ ☆ ꙳ *.What Sort of Music They Listen to...?

a/n: firstly, hi baby<333 🙈thank you for saying that and secondly, sorry for taking so long with this - school stuff just had my head</3 and lastly, this is purely based on MY music taste (unfortunately) so i mean, if you don't know some of this artists or expected different ones then<///3(i also shift a lot from hindi to english music so japanese music was anyways a no-go lol)

also majot sorry for no Toji (he just stumped me so bad)

warnings: not proof-read, just rambling

Satoru Gojo:

Satoru i think, does a little bit of everything - nor is he shy to try new music. He's the kind of guy who recognises every song that plays - wherever it be, radio, malls, restaurants, he een knows the elevator music so...yes. At the same time, i think he'd also just...put everything in his 'liked' playlist💀and call it a day. In particular i feel Satoru is Kendrick guy? and also Doechii? but when in feels, i think he also pulls out some Sufjan Stevens and Finneas as well lmao (i think teen! Satoru would also have Cavetown and Arctic Monkeys in his playlists) although i don't think he'd play their songs on his head but unironically knows every lyric and bobs his head to all hot girl music (nikki and britney and megan, the entire bunch lol) Definitely an ABBA guy<3

Suguru Geto:

As i've stated many times on my blog lmao, Suguru would probably be a Hozier and Lord Huron guy - it's the arsonist vibe that makes me say this? and the slight rebellion but that's just me. A huge 70s-90s sucker actually, and Nirvana - he is the guy who won't ask you to name 5 songs but looks at you and judges you with the assumption that you don't. Teen Suguru would get down to fight you if you said you were a bigger MCR fan. I think he also is a vibe to Florence and the machine or Mitski (just again, his vibe - idk if he'd listen or whatever) I think Suguru would fw indie bands too - GROUPLOVE and Peach pit being major artists there, maybe some drifting Yot Club or Cleffy too Also again, a Kendrick guy - i just think Suguru is the kind who enjoys the lyricism that goes in the art yk? be it whatever genre. Unironically began to listen to Mother Mother after leaving and just...never...stopped. He is the kind to have 50+ playlists (listen to the same 5 on repeat though) i also think he majorly judges lana listeners

Kento Nanami:

Hmmmmmmm, i feel like - i don't want to stereotype - but he stays away from the new music? idk how to explain (hates ice spice if you catch my drift), he definitely doesn't mind rap music but again, wouldn't play it on his own. As it is a fanon thing anyways that Kento was emo so i mean, you've got MCR (you know he never refused to jam to Teen Spirits with Suguru<3) - fall out boy, maybe paramore? on his playlist. but i do believe older him would have shifted to elvis maybe? not a major jazz guy but enough to prove a point lol. Teen Kento would in fact ask you to name 5 name songs and would be proud of listening to under-rated artists (and roll his eyes when Satoru would do the same but, for some overly-hyped artist of the time). I think Nanami isn't huge on music anyways though - i do see Satoru listening to music 24/7 (don't ask why but smn to do with his infinity) and Suguru too plays it a decent amount but for Nanami, his music app opens 2 times a week lmao <3

All of this work is entirely original and my own—please refrain from copying or reposting.

Likes and Reblogs highly appreciated!

[totallyboatless]

Is anyone else noticing headcanons about which character is the top and which is the bottom in mlm pairings is straying away from subverting expectations by having the more “effeminate” dude top and is getting dangerously close/crossing the line into “being a bottom is inherently effeminate in and of itself so we can’t put the effeminate character in that position because it’s insulting” ?

It feels like it’s calculating Masculinity Points and determining top/bottom roles from there based on what would “subvert expectations” most just for the sake of it instead of considering what would influence a character’s psychosexual behavior

Like right now I’m thinking about Spartacus (bc these days I’m always thinking about Spartacus) and (granted, years old) discourse about how Nasir should have been a top bc it’s insulting to assume the smaller, “more feminine” long haired guy would bottom

Except if you think about his character for more than a few minutes, that makes zero sense *at all*. Firstly, Nasir has a beautiful arc around his relationship with masculinity and anger, and finding ways to become empowered through getting stronger and learning to fight

As a trans dude, his arc means a lot to me personally

So when I see people insinuating that him bottoming takes away from the relationship he forms with traditional expression of masculinity, I find it pretty frustrating and honestly kind of insulting

Okay we’re here, I’m writing Spartacus meta for 10 people on this site I guess. Here’s my analysis of Nasir’s and Agron’s psychosexual motivations that would lead to their particular dynamic:

Nasir:

- a sex slave when we meet him, but the *only* evidence we have from the text itself is his Dominus asking to be fucked *by* Nasir. Sure it’s fair to assume bottoming could have happened in turn, but all fic I’ve read ignores the truth that the only concrete info we have on what was asked of Nasir is him being forced to top

- related, this is a man who has only ever known what it is to serve other people sexually, never allowed a passive role of receiving pleasure (even if he was bottoming, his experience still comes from an active place of service)

Does this not sound like a man that would get pleasure from allowing someone to take a leading role focusing on pleasuring him? Someone who would find comfort in being allowed to turn his brain off?

Agron:

- a man whose entire motivation when we first meet him is taking care of his brother (I AM NOT GOING IN INCEST DIRECTION—I know that’s a fandom thing but personally I get squicked by incest, and psychosexual behavior is often influenced by things that aren’t themselves inherently sexual). When his brother dies, Agron goes off the rails. He’s lost a sense of purpose. Even as aggressive as he can be, ultimately his core is to be a caretaker, and so when he loses that outlet he becomes the most violent shadow of himself

- Until Nasir, his only outlet for caretaking was violence. With Nasir, he finds an ability to express his caretaking desires through another form of passionate physicality: topping

Does that not sound like a dude who would specifically find pleasure in being in control of giving someone else pleasure? Does this not sound like a service top?

All this to say, I do get it when people want writers to think outside of stereotypical optics of “who tops and who bottoms” in male relationships. But some people are telling on themselves by still boiling men down into strict roles that can be dismissive of character motivations in the name of progressive writing that ultimately misses the mark in a similar way

I’m dancing around TMI, but it’s empowering for me to see characters I relate to forming relationships to masculinity that isn’t “diminished” by enjoying a “feminine” sexual position. So i’m likely projecting a lot, but this is my lived truth as a queer man. I’m curious if other people relate.

Thank u

[exit]

Bonus:

Like COME ON

[philosophywizzard]

I don't like it when someone says that a cosplayer is "Too pretty/handsome/attractive to cosplay Snape" because it makes me think "Oh, so there's someone that they believe is ugly enough to cosplay Snape?"

Which shouldn't be. Because judging people based on looks is rude. People with self-image issues that have to do with their hair or other features - the nose is one of the most popular ones - still exist and are probably in this fandom. I've seen a post of someone saying that when they were a kid, around the time Harry Potter was getting popular, they would be compared to Snape in derogatory ways.

They had an issue with their hair - it was greasy no matter how hard they tried to scrub it all off, and the overwashing got so bad it began harming their scalp and hair growth because of the kinds of shampoo they were using. There is no reason why we need to have a beauty standard here. It's made for everyone. The fandom I mean.

I've been made fun of for my hair, skin, and nose before. It's why I've related to Snape. I'm African, and a lot of the time, the racism toward people like me transcends a lot of stereotypes. Before I grew a little more into my features, my nose was bulbous, and to a lot of the white kids I was around (I was in a mainly American/Asian place - the Asian kids were much nicer tho...) I looked really weird to them. That school I was in was teaching racism anyway, so looking back I'm not surprised. But at the moment, it hurt to be called out for my hair or my nose, or the way I was shaped.

Now, I've learned how to embrace a lot of things, and the kid chub is gone. I'm complimented a lot based on how I look before people notice how I act. I'd love to cosplay as Snape one day, but I don't want to post that and start getting those comments that I look too good to possibly cosplay a "canonically ugly character". Using looks in an argument or a debate isn't very smart, because one day, we're all going to be old and wrinkly, some of us more than others based on our lifestyles.

Wow, that was a long rant ^^' srry yall.

[girlactionfigure]

what is happening on the...right?

MARCH 23, 2025

If you’ve been following me for a while, you’ll know I’ve spent the past five or so years sounding the alarm -- evidently in vain -- on the mainstreaming of what was once relatively fringe antisemitism on the left of the political spectrum, particularly in the West. 

Now, I’m noticing a similar pattern taking hold on the right, and we need to talk about it.

Please note this post will discuss this issue primarily in an American context.

FIRST THINGS FIRST

Like left-wing antisemitism, right-wing antisemitism is hardly a new phenomenon. After all, antisemitism, as the “world’s oldest hatred,” long predates the left-right political spectrum as we understand it today. The Nazi regime, for example, which murdered nearly 70% of Europe’s Jewish population, is what we would consider far-right. White supremacists, who hate Jews as a matter of principle, are far-right. 

But since the Holocaust, blatantly overt and violent right-wing antisemitism -- temporarily, at least -- became increasingly sidelined in mainstream right-wing politics, especially with the rise of Christian Zionism and Evangelical influence on American politics (more on this in a second). 

That’s not to say right-wing antisemitism ever truly disappeared from the mainstream right, because it didn’t.It simply became more covert. For example, the McCarthyist purges of the 1950s carried heavy antisemitic undertones, and McCarthy was, by all accounts, an antisemite, but at least in the open, he was going after “communists,” not Jews.

A RISE IN LEFT-WING ANTISEMITISM WILL ALWAYS LEAD TO A RISE IN RIGHT-WING ANTISEMITISM, AND VICE VERSA

Left and right antisemitism work together, not apart. They are not two separate entities. They utilize the same tropes, same conspiracies, and same stereotypes. Time and time again in history, and to the present day, right-wing antisemites have collaborated with left-wing antisemites with one ulterior mission: to hurt Jews. Antisemites always prioritize their antisemitism over their political views.

When antisemitism rises on the left -- as we have seen in the aftermath of the October 7 massacre -- it also rises on the right, and vice versa. When left-wing antisemites spread antisemitic conspiracies, stereotypes, and tropes, white supremacists hear them loud and clear, and vice versa.

It’s no surprise that with the mainstreaming of left-wing antisemitism in the aftermath of October 7, the antisemitic rhetoric of notorious far-right figures such as Candace Owens, Dan Bilzerian, David Duke, and Nick Fuentes is suddenly gaining more and more traction on the mainstream right as well. 

Antisemitism is not a political position, though it is often weaponized by politicians, and addressing it as such is a distraction that hinders our ability to effectively combat how this bigotry moves and functions.

CHRISTIAN ZIONISM AND THE POLITICAL RIGHT

Zionism is the belief that Jews have a right to self-determination in the Land of Israel. In modern terms, this translates to support for the State of Israel’s continued existence. There are many Christians who are Zionists, but this differs from an entirely separate movement known as Christian Zionism. 

Christian Zionism is the belief that the return of Jews to the Land of Israel and the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 was the fulfillment of a Biblical prophecy. Many Christian Zionists also believe that the gathering of all Jews in Israel is a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Jesus. Jews will then be faced with the choice of converting to Christianity or death. Christian Zionism sees Jews and the State of Israel as a means to an end. It’s not about Jewish autonomy, sovereignty, identity, safety, or beliefs. 

Christian Zionism is deeply popular with the right-wing American voter base and has been since the 1970s; as many as 80% of Evangelical Christians are Christian Zionists. However, though naturally many Jews consider the movement uncomfortable, if not outright antisemitic, it is much less overtly antisemitic than the antisemitism we see from far-right white supremacists like David Duke or figures such as Candace Jones.

THE MAINSTREAMING OF CHRISTIAN ZIONISM

American conservative right-wing attitudes toward the Jews started shifting after the Holocaust, but what really changed it all was the mainstreaming of Christian Zionism. 

In the 1970s, an American pastor named Rev. Jerry Falwell formed an organization called the Moral Majority, with the purpose of mobilizing conservative Christians to register to vote for conservative candidates. One of the founding principles of the organization was “support for Israel and Jewish people everywhere.” By the 1980s, the Moral Majority had some six million members. They are credited for putting Ronald Reagan in office.

Falwell was a televangelist, and in 1980, he went on television in front of millions of viewers and stated, “I firmly believe God has blessed America because America has blessed the Jew. If this nation wants her fields to remain white with grain, her scientific achievements to remain notable, and her freedom to remain intact, America must continue to stand with Israel.”

While the Moral Majority was disbanded in 1989, 80% of American Evangelical Christians continue to support Christian Zionism. Despite their real intentions, this meant that, in practice, most conservative Americans started supporting policies regarding Israel that were usually -- but not always -- conducive to Jewish safety (after all, half of the world’s Jews live in Israel and most American Jews feel invested in the security and continued existence of the State of Israel). Overt expressions of conservative and/or Christian antisemitism became much less overt and less mainstream.

RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY THEORISTS DRIVE A WEDGE BETWEEN CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIANS, JEWS, AND ISRAEL 

Since the explosion of left-wing antisemitism post-October 7, overtly antisemitic figures on the right have gained more and more traction, often by regurgitating rhetoric that perfectly mirrors that of left-wing antisemites, or rhetoric that is only slightly repackaged to appeal to their right-wing audience. In particular, I’ve noticed influencers like Ian Carroll trying to drive a wedge between Evangelical/Christian supporters of Jews and Israel, thus pushing for overt antisemitism to become mainstream and accepted on the political right. 

Consider, for example, Carroll’s now infamous, conspiratorial, and blatantly false rant on the Twins Pod, shortly before he went on the Joe Rogan Experience, the most listened podcast in the world: 

“In the early 1900s…the Rothschild family hired this dude, this pastor, in the deep south. He made a new version of the Bible, called the Scofield Bible. He wrote this new Bible that has all these new interpretations of the text...that’s where Judeo-Christianity kinda came from, and the idea that…this modern Israel thing is the Israel of the Bible, it came from that Bible...And so they had the deals that they could make to get that Bible into all the mega churches across whole denominations of Christianity. So that was when Christianity got kind of…Jewified.”

A white supremacist and Holocaust denier Tweeted this regarding Ian Carroll’s nonsensical conspiracies about the “Scofield Bible”:

Conspiracy theories about and demonization of the Talmud are emblematic of the oldest kind of Christian antisemitism, dating to the Middle Ages. In his response, Carroll implies that his goal is to ultimately return this kind of classic antisemitic rhetoric to the mainstream.

THE RIGHT AND ANTISEMITIC PODCASTERS

The Joe Rogan Experience is the most listened to podcast in the world, with some 19.4 million subscribers on Spotify alone (that’s more subscribers than there are Jews in the world). While Joe Rogan doesn’t call himself a conservative, over half of his listener base identifies as Republican and even more identify as conservatives. In recent weeks, Rogan has hosted two prominent antisemitic conspiracy theorists on his podcast. Among them: 

Ian Carroll, whose comments on the show included calling Jeffrey Epstein “a Jewish organization working on behalf of Israel” and blaming Israel for 9/11.

Darryl Cooper, a Holocaust revisionist, who used his platform on Rogan’s show to call Jews paranoid, claim Hitler opposed Kristallnacht, and insist that Hitler’s antisemitism was a natural response to Germany’s sorry economic state post-World War I.

Rogan justifies inviting these guests on as “just asking questions,” but he never seriously challenges their harmful claims.

Meanwhile, for months, other popular conservative podcasters such as Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson have spent the past year or so really ramping up the antisemitic rhetoric on their respective platforms, engaging on everything from Holocaust denial to October 7 denial to conspiracies about the Talmud and more.

Blair White is a conservative influencer and political commentator who in the past has expressed support for Israel. Now, as antisemitic conspiracies become more and more popular among right-wing figures, she too is engaging in this rhetoric.

For a full bibliography of my sources, please head over to my Instagram and  Patreon. 

rootsmetals

will be VERY interesting to see who shares this who hasn’t shared any of my posts about antisemitism on the left…and vice versa 👀

[scoobydoodean]

Oh, I see. You and all your little friends are just too DUMB to understand. Too low IQ. The arguments sure is convincing.

I’m not kidding they really are saying somewhere out there that Kripke couldn’t possibly understand what it means to be blue collar because to do that, you’d have to have read about the value of a linen coat (which is not directly related to any of this btw) from Marx’s Das Kapital. Kripke of course couldn’t possibly have read it, and if you haven’t read it, you can’t possibly understand anything about class. You have to have read Theory™️ to understand what it means to be *looks down my nose at people who I assume Have Not Read All The Books That I Did* blue collar *sips from tea cup with my pinky out, chortling*

[yellowcry]

Me: *Casually checks rtc wiki page for Natalia*

Me:

Me: Is calling her waist eleven times out of ten not enough????

Like I even checked, there's not such a thing as Muruska? And what is it supposed to be? It's not connected via - so it's separate from the name and surname. And the form is wrong for the patronymic name. It should have suffix -ivn- or -yivn- and no it couldn't be a middle name. Ukranians don't have these.

[lollytea]

I am just as nitpicky as anybody else when it comes to characters I'm obsessed with. But I don't find people who mischaracterize them nearly as annoying as people who write condescending posts about others who mischaracterize them which seem more motivated by feeding their own superiority complex about Being The One Person to Understand Mr Blorbo rather than giving any constructive advice.

[justabunchofdragons]

"relationships between 19 and 29 year olds are not inherently bad!!! normalise not being morally affronted whenever you see this!! people can have common interests!!" "and i do think that romantic relationships with this age gap are WEIRD but thats not important" i mean. okay.

[nexus-nebulae]

oh my god. that one "oc" we wrote who had DID that we came up with before our syscovery. that was not an oc. oh my god cody and blake why did you take five years to make yourselves known to us-

[worstsequence]

who else is here on this day thinking about eddie lovey dovey free with affection known dustin for not even a year uses his dying breath to tell him he loves him munson

[quartermoonconvergence]

gotta be honest here if u rationalise max’s parent characterisation as “indians who don’t know english” i do not want u here

[liquidstar]

I was thinking it would be cool if there was an ocd character bracket poll (if there is lmk?) But also I don't think there are enough characters in popular media that are actually good ocd representation 💀 so it would almost certainly have to extend to headcanon...

[jujutsukaisen0]

i also think its insanely ridiculous that the main issue people take with der schuh des manitu is the fact that winnetouch being a flamboyant gay guy must mean the entire movie is homophobic (despite winnetouch having a boyfriend who is in fact Not flamboyant?????) and not the very obvious other thing we should be worried about

[alaskan-wallflower]

yall i don’t know how many times i need to say this but i don’t want to get political on my blog. stop asking me about my opinions on wars. any political asks will be deleted and blocked. i’m not putting up with that. i don’t know how many more times i need to say it but i don’t want to involve politics on my blog. respect that.

just because i post about why antisemitism and tokenism in fanon is bad doesn’t mean i want to talk politics. and stop assuming my viewings on politics because i talk about antisemitic stereotypes portrayed in fanon and why they’re bad. i’ve never posted anything political on my blog other than an awareness post about sudan’s wifi being cut. i’ve never posted anything about the war. so stop asking shit like ‘WhY dO yOu SuPpOrT aNd FoLlOw PrO (insert political viewing) bLoGs If YoUrE pRo (insert opposing political issue)”

i’ve never talked about the war, nor politics. so stop asking and assuming. you’re making an ass out of yourself.

[lutenants]

one day i will explain further about lutes self approval as a 'weapon' as opposed to a human.

[jackienautism]

im just bitter but the next time i see someone refeer to kaitlyn as "the normal one" is the day i finally kill