#you were Goebbels!!!
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
No memes or shit-posts, just Herseph <3
Herseph<3 (click the photos to see the full image, sorry for cropping errors!!)
they're such a duo.
----------------------------------------------------i do not condone or support n*zi/f*cist ideologies!
#reichblr#herseph#joseph goebbels#hermann goering#hermann goring#ww2#the history books are trying to deceive you they were definitely gay#ww2 germany#world war two#I WOKE UP IN A NEW BUGATTI🔥🔥🔥
51 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hi what the fuck is reichblr?????
#are those people real what did I stumble over#i just wanted to see if there were some silly nazi memes to send to my friends (don't ask its. a lot to explain) and now I am looking atm#hitler sense of style appreciation post I. ????????????#I worry we're forgetting that those were real people who's deluded ideal of what humanity should be like cost a lot of people their life#''sorry guys I haven't drawn him in a while'' that is Joseph Goebbels I'm not quite sure if you're supposed to draw that man at all#unless it's a caricature???#real people who caused a lot of real suffering is this the hill you want to visit and maybe die on are you really sure you're not makinh a.#or multiple really#are you SURE you're not making a few mistakes here and there just. just asking because thats. Heinrich Himmler?#idk I'm just.#from the perspective of someone who's been told for two years straight how important it is thatbwe don't forgwt that those people were#really not great personalities and that they did a lot of bad things on a lot of levels#it just seems.... not insensitive per se but very very#if it's a joke okay I can respect the irony thats half of my social circle but on god? in all seriousness? i must admit I'm a tad concerned
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
I've complained about this before but the biggest problem with Ikémen vampire is just the main conflict just doesn't freaking work. It's an idea that's really easy to be opinionated about but they don't allow the character to be opinionated cause she needs to be easy to insert yourself. So they say their big piece about whatever and I can't argue at all. So annoying.
#basically it bothers me i cant arguee i want to argue so bad#'the world is a fuck and it shumans fault so i will do the most nonsense things to srop it'#first of all humans didnt fuck the world....most likely like 5 guys fucked the world by deciding to launcj nukes and 99.9% of ppl didnt agre#also it just grinds my gears cause the ppl youre ressing wouldnt help you anyway#you wanna change tbe world and guide human tbough you need like goebbels... he was a king of propaganda#i mean no one wanna daye him so dont add him but thats the honest truth#also napolean was the king of propaganda its how he kept his wars going and kept the french ppl from rising up against him so why isnhe#wasting his tome teaching kids???#sorry my hate for napolean coming in none of these characters are in any wau like they were in real life but napolean was also just not a ho#good guyhe really jist hated britain and wanted to conquer the world#i wouldnt mind him existing in game and just barely talking abt it but the way they have him say he just wanted peace 🤮#nooo#he just fuckingg hated britain and was a career soldier who loved war#but to be fair theyre japanese and a love of imperialism goes deep from all the propaganda
0 notes
Text
look dawg, the destruction of Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute was an important moment in the Holocaust, but I feel like ever since goyische tumblr learned about it it's literally all they talk about. People have just instantly latched onto it because it's something that makes them feel connected. "Those famous pictures of Nazi book burnings are them burning gay and trans research" comes off as less of recontextualizing history and more of "omg that's me! I'm famous!". The fact that it's brought up in every conversation about the Holocaust now, even when the discussion is about the specific persecution of other groups, is highly suspect. When Jews talk about the Holocaust, we don't view the victims as people like us. They are us. They're our parents and grandparents, our great- uncles and aunts. In every generation we must see ourselves as if we left Egypt
JKR is engaging in Holocaust denial, but it's a soft sort of denial. Someone told her the Nazis hated trans people, and she responded "nuh-uh" because she didn't want to believe trans people have been around for that long. It's bad, sure, but we already knew she was a shitty person. I think it's a better opportunity to discuss the process of radicalization and closed-loop ideological thinking than to shit on the internet's favorite punching bag with your new favorite factoid. Jews right now are experiencing violent antisemitism. Bomb threats, death threats, rape threats have become the norm for a lot of us, but I have yet to see that discussed with the same fervor as JKR being shitty for the gajillionth time. If you truly want to make yourself a part of the living history of the Holocaust, you have to understand how to fight for what's important. You have to learn how to protect what you love, not just destroy what you hate. It's very important not to lose the plot here
It's crucial that we remember that the book burnings were primarily about Jews. Joseph Goebbels proclaimed in Berlin "The era of extreme Jewish intellectualism is now at an end. The breakthrough of the German revolution has again cleared the way on the German path...The future German man will not just be a man of books, but a man of character." The German Student Union described book burnings as a "response to a worldwide Jewish smear campaign against Germany and an affirmation of traditional German values." Science, study, reason, progress were all seen as Jewish plots to destroy society (wonder where else we've seen that). Magnus Hirschfeld was persecuted because he was gay and his Institute was full of gay and trans people, yes. But it was also because he was a Jew, and a man of science who was pushing the boundaries of medical care for LGBT people. Just. something to think about
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
Having spent pretty much the entire year immersed in studying Nazi Germany, the Holocaust, and genocide more broadly, my heart is bursting with the need to stress how much you should take Project 2025 seriously. This is a long post but please stick with me.
Don't take this post as an attempt to concretely predict anything. We can't ever fully know the future and I think it's silly to say with total certainty “if Trump wins then America will become just like Nazi Germany” - not only because the future isn't written yet, but also because Germany under the Nazis was a very specific regime with its own quirks and peculiarities and I don't think that even a worst-case-scenario Trump regime would look exactly like Hitler's Germany. No two regimes ever look exactly alike: it would use the same colour palette as all far-right dictatorships but be constructed from a different medium, like what a watercolour is to an oil painting.
But just because Trump is a very different person from Hitler, and a worst-case-scenario Trump dictatorship would not literally be “Nazi Germany all over again”, that doesn't mean that what happened in Germany isn't instructive here. Forget the specifics of whether or not Trump as a dictator would organise a state identically to how the Nazis organised Germany or whatever; on a far broader and more relevant level, there is a distressing number of similarities. And too many people are falling into the same thought traps as they did then.
Please don't assume that Trump is “way too incompetent” to achieve what's in Project 2025 or Agenda 47. They said the same thing about Hitler. They said that there was no way this showman could govern effectively - holding big rallies and making speeches that get people riled up isn't the same as being good at running a functioning state and achieving what you want. The New York Times even wrote after he became Chancellor of Germany that this would only “let him expose to the German public his own futility”. And in many ways Hitler was pretty incompetent. But that didn't end up mattering. The greatest crime of the Nazi regime, the Holocaust, was masterminded mostly by a whole load of people besides Hitler, who were delegated the nitty-gritty task of actually orchestrating it. Hitler's personal incompetence didn't prevent war or genocide.
Please don't assume that Trump is “just a wacky nutcase” who “can't possibly be a real risk”. They said the same thing about Hitler. The mainstream media gave constant coverage to all the crazy extreme things Hitler said as if he was merely a bit of a joke and not a massive threat. The Nazis were quite happy with this. To quote Goebbels repeatedly in his diary, “The main thing is they're talking about us.”
Please don't assume that being in power will “moderate” Trump and that “of course he won't be able to do all the crazy stuff once he actually has to govern”. They said the same thing about Hitler. It was a common sentiment in the early 1930s that all the sensible politicians around him would force him to moderate his stances. Fritz von Papen, the last Chancellor of Weimar Germany, persuaded President Hindenburg to make Hitler the Chancellor by assuring him, “In a few months, we will have pushed [Hitler] so far into the corner that he will squeak.” It turns out that power doesn't “moderate” people who are openly talking about a dictatorship.
Please don't assume that there's any truth to the whole “Trump has nothing to do with Project 2025 and trying to link it to him is just liberal hysteria” line. They said the same thing about Hitler. People repeatedly asserted that Nazi street violence wasn't really representative of the party leadership; it wasn't representative of Hitler. He was even subpoenaed by a very brave lawyer in 1931 in a bid to prove that recent violence by Nazi stormtroopers was committed with the knowledge and encouragement of the party leadership, with part of the prosecution's argument hanging on a pamphlet by Goebbels that promised a violent overthrow of the state if the Nazis couldn't come to power legitimately. Surely no legal political party could be publishing that. In a successful attempt to escape criminal charges, Hitler repeatedly lied that the pamphlet was not official Nazi Party material and that he didn't know anything about it. No Trump didn't write it, no it isn't an official GOP manifesto, but the links between Project 2025 and Trump, the previous Trump administration, and Trump allies are extremely well documented. Just the other day, Project 2025 co-author Russell Vought was caught calling Trump's disavowals of the document “graduate-level politics” and saying, “what he's doing is just very, very conscious distancing himself from a brand ... he's in fact not even opposing himself to a particular policy.”
Please don't assume that “there's no way something like that could happen here; we're way too educated and advanced”. They said the same thing about Hitler. The Germany of the 1920s and 1930s was one of the most educated and most scientifically and industrially advanced nations in the world, and its cities were some of the most progressive in the world. People were stunned and horrified that it was in Germany of all places - Germany, land of music and art and science and literature! - that fascism took root. Germany's economic and social advancement didn't stop about 40% of its voters choosing the Nazis. It didn't stop them taking power.
Please don't assume that Project 2025 is “just a wishlist” and “not actually a serious plan”. They said the same thing about Hitler. As is hopefully very clear by now, plenty of people did not think that the Nazis were capable of, or would dare to try, putting into actual practice the horrific ideas about race that undergirded so much of their ideology. “I like Hitler; he talks sense economically and I think all this stuff about Jews is just bluff and bluster.” “Every party has a loony wing, right? You have to understand they're not serious when they talk about this stuff; they're just telling their base what they want to hear.” “God have you heard this crazy race science shit about head shapes and stuff? It's hilarious! I'm sure none of them at the top really believe that; there's no way they'd be that nuts.” When a group of people like this tells you what they believe and tells you what they want to do with power, believe them. No matter how ridiculous they seem, they're not joking.
In the words of Hans Litten, the lawyer who subpoenaed and cross-examined Hitler in that court case in 1931, “Don't listen to him; he's telling the truth.” Litten was arrested on the night of the Reichstag fire in 1933 and spent the rest of his life being tortured in concentration camps before dying in Dachau in 1938 at the age of 34.
A tyrannical dictatorship can often be seen coming a mile away. I don't want to imply for a second that what the Nazis did came as a surprise to everyone and couldn't possibly have been predicted. There were people who saw this coming in the 1920s and 1930s and tried to sound the alarm while they still had a chance. But they were too often in the minority, taking the threat seriously while others had convinced themselves that there was no need for concern because the Nazis wouldn't really do all the things they repeatedly talked about wanting to do. Everyone should have seen this coming, but too many people wanted to believe it couldn't be true.
Don't let this scare you. Let it energise you. Talk to the people in your life about Project 2025 and Agenda 47. Push back against people who assert that “they'd never actually do all that stuff” or “Trump didn't even write Project 2025” or “it's not a real plan, just a list of crazy shit to get the base riled up”. Have conversations with folks you know who are on the fence about voting or about who to vote for and who seem persuadable. Make sure you're registered to vote, and keep making sure, especially if you live in a red state where people keep mysteriously dropping off voter rolls.
Now, again, please don't read this as some confident prediction that Trump will be a Hitler figure. I want to stress that is a worst-case scenario. If a Trump presidency is what happens, I would much prefer the best-case scenario: that he spends four years fumbling around and not really accomplishing anything and then gives up power at the end without much of a fight. But it would also be a folly to be smugly overconfident that the worst-case scenario “won't” or “can't” happen. It could. It has happened before. There is no reason it couldn't happen again.
#politics#us politics#american politics#us election#election 2024#2024 election#2024 elections#us elections#2024 presidential election#antifascism#political history#ww2 history#ww2#nazi germany#please vote#your vote matters#voting matters#project 2025#agenda 47#harris#kamala harris#my posts
389 notes
·
View notes
Text
Socialism, as we know, presupposes public ownership of the means of production. Under socialism, the exploitation of man by man is abolished. Of course, the Nazis have nothing of the kind. The coming of the Nazis to power and their domination for 8 years in Germany showed the whole world that these “socialists,” like no one before them, ensured the growth of profits for Krupp and Borsig. Suffice it to point out that during the years of fascist domination in Germany, the largest joint-stock companies grew unusually quickly. So, for example, in 1937 in Germany there were 6 supergiant concerns with a capital of over 100 million marks, in 1939 there were already 9 such concerns. Some joint-stock companies (Harpener Bergbau, Siemens-Halske, etc.) doubled and tripled their capital during the years of the domination of the fascists. Only in 1939, the profits of the joint-stock mining company Hibernia AG increased by a fabulous figure – 100 million marks. The German Chemical Trust (IG Farbenindustrie) made a net profit in 1939 of about 60 million marks. This is what Hitler’s “socialism” is! This is the “socialism” of the monopoly tycoons, the largest capitalists in the world.
The fascist leaders themselves stole huge sums of money. It is widely known that the Hermann Goering company has a capital of 800 million marks. This is quite eloquent evidence of the monstrous, predatory fever of enrichment that the “socialists” Hitler, Goering, Goebbels and Co. are gripping. This is what Hitler’s “socialism” looks like in industry. The same kind of “socialism” is carried out by the fascists in agriculture. After the fascists came to power, the old landowners’ farms began to gain strength and new landowners’ estates began to emerge. A former associate of Hitler, Hermann Rauschning, who fled from Hitler, says that he once asked Hitler: “But what about those points of the program that relate to agrarian reform, the destruction of wage labor and the nationalization of banks?” Hitler replied: “Do I really have to explain to you the meaning of this program? Are you so primitive that you take it literally and do not see that this is only a decoration for our performance? In this program, established for the masses, I will never change anything ... To nourish the hopes of the masses, it is necessary to establish some visible stages.” Thus, Hitler once again declared that the program and all sorts of talk about socialism are all the decoration of a spectacle played out by the imperialists in order to deceive the masses. Hitler’s Minister of Agriculture Darre in the first days after the Nazis came to power said: “I will not touch a single estate, no matter how large it may be (and I know that I say this in full agreement with the Reich Chancellor’s opinion) ... I also will not allow the violation of the property rights of the pledged large land holdings.” Indeed, the Nazis kept their promise. Not only did they not touch a single estate, but the number of landowners was increased: the leaders of fascism themselves became large landowners.
Who are the National Socialists? Pavel Yudin, 1942
108 notes
·
View notes
Note
anyway another one. (NEW ANTISEMITIC TROPE SPOTTED, not really but yes!)
every single trope, and a new one!!!
holocaust inversion
"your just weaponising antisemitism, it's not that bad" trope
Israelis are genocidal trope
blood libel x2
baby killers (why)
and some more I lack the ability to analyse
---new---
Israel depicted as a Canaan dog
bc I guess they are zionist???? never mind how they are a traditional dog of the canaanites/israelites and many others in the levant! no no, we will ignore that
this is such a surreal ass art piece, and really well drawn. (LIKE DAMN BOY THE SHADING IS IMMACULATE)
really sad they were radicalised to shit, they could wholeheartedly have a career.
(I initially thought it was commissioned but no I think they legit drew this, such a shame their art is very good)
tropes I noticed
river to the sea
BDS
fandomising war? (maybe, with the tag spam?)
and then BONUS!
Israel depicted as canaan dog
from the river to the sea
why is the art so good tho, like smh.
-pop
This the old trope of depucting Jews as dogs it’s just an arab trope rather than a western one eo it’s new to us but “jews are predators/parasites is literal nazi propaganda”
Goebbels would be proud of you Op
Also holy shit that’s a fucking bingo of all the tropes
#leftist antisemitism#antisemitism#leftist brainrot#leftist hypocrisy#holocaust inversion#dehumanization#blood libel
101 notes
·
View notes
Text
he had a cigarette with his number on it ₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧
dieter hellstrom x translator!reader
no tw
“Let’s wait for Emmanuelle to come before we start talking.” said Zoller, making a guy you worked for sigh.
They continued their discussion while you looked at the entrance at the other end of café. Your table was isolated from others highlighting the importance of men at the table - Frederick Zoller and Joseph Goebbels who you worked for.
You knew that somewhere close was Hans Landa but you didn't see him.
As you were waiting you noticed some noise slightly dying up. The change of the people at the other tables was so small - you barely noticed it - when two people entered. A blonde girl and tall man in leather uniform. You guessed that the woman would be Emmanuelle Mimieux but the second person you knew.
Who wouldn't?
Officer Dieter Hellstrom.
You meet him once marginally, Goebbels introduced the two of you out of politeness.
Mimieux and Hellstrom walked up to your table. Her expression was slightly annoyed while his walk behind her was confident as if not letting her escape. Zoller stood up like an exited puppy making my eyes roll.
Zoller introduced the blonde to Goebbels and you. You politely shook her hand.
“And you met the Major.” he turned to Hellstrom.
“I didn't introduce myself. Major Dieter Hellstrom of the Gestapo. At your service.” he told her, his demeanor has changed slightly. You noticed that in Emmanuelle's eyes. He was probably an asshole to her before. He chuckled but there was nothing nice about it.
“Have a seat please.” he pointed at the seat. After she sat down he poured champagne for her and himself. He took a seat next to you.
You translated the conversation between Goebbels and Mimieux feeling the gaze of Gestapo officer on you. The four of you continued to talk for a while, the tall man only watched you without a word. He looked slightly amused by the discussion which to your surprise made you glad, knowing that you're not the only one finding Frederick's actions ridiculous and a little bit pathetic.
“Ah, Landa, here you are.” announced Goebbels as an older man entered. You uncontrollably straightened up your posture which to Hellstrom exhaled as some sort of chuckle. You looked at him surprised but others didn't seem to notice this interaction - fully focused on Landa. He smiled at you and casually turned his attention to others, leaving you to wonder if he actually smiled or did he just continue some sort of secret mockery.
Goebbels excused himself, not saying anything to you. You wanted to stand up and follow him but Hellstrom gripped the backrest of your seat, stopping you from pushing back your chair. His hand clenched on the wooden chair was almost touching the skin on your neck. You could feel the heat emanating from his fingers.
“Don’t leave so soon.” his voice drained with mockery. “I believe you know officer? Landa.”
Your eyes flickered up to Hans Landa. You answered unsure.
“Yes… We met.”
Older man took your hand and brought your palm to his lips.
“Pleasure to meet you again.” he said, still holding your hand as you smiled politely hiding the fact that you wanted to get away.
Hellstrom continued to stare into your face as you took my arm away from Landa. Older man turned to Emmanuelle. You exhaled the breath you were holding in.
Dieter's hand was still gripping on the backrest of your seat trapping you. His eyes were focused on you and you struggled to hold his gaze.
“Perhaps you chose the wrong line of work if talking to german officials makes you so nervous?” he as asked in low voice as the rest of table was focused on themselves.
“I’m not nervous.” you mumbled as he leaned in closer.
“Of course you're not.” he said ironically, his voice quiet. You felt his thumb lightly caress the back of your neck sending shivers down your spine but you didn't react.
You cleared my throat hoping that he would stop before anyone noticed.
Then why did you felt disappointed when he brought his arm back to the table and cold air hit your skin?
He took out a pack of cigarettes from the pocket of his leather coat. He offered one to you as his fingers swiftly took one for himself.
“I don't smoke.” you said, Hellstrom slightly raised his brows and muttered.
“Well aren't you a good girl?” he casually lit his cigarette like he didn't just leave you speechless. The rhetorical question was supposed to be sarcastic but he kept a straight face. You wondered if he was flirting or did he just want some sort of reaction from you.
He inhaled and blew a smoke in the air. Your eyes traced his jaw clenching as he exhaled.
“I hope you wouldn't mind if I talked to Miss Mimieux. I have a couple of questions regarding the safety of the cinema." Hans Landa interrupted your thoughts.
Gestapo officer nodded and stood up. You followed his footsteps as he left. You went outside the café, the bell rang as the doors closed behind you. He continued to smoke as he watched people walking on the other side of the street. Another smoky exhale came out of his mouth, this time his unreadable eyes focused on you. He tapped off the ashes, his fingers playing with the cigarette.
“We've met already, right?” he asked, his piercing eyes not leaving your face.
“Yes.” you said recalling it “At a banquet few months ago.” you continued after he doesn't didn't say anything. He nodded thoughtfully, pausing for a second.
“How’s your job going?” he threw away the rest of his cigarette, crushing it with his combat boot.
“I’d say pretty good.”
“Good.” he gave you a wry smile.
There was a moment of palpable silence between the two of you. The suffocating stillness carried more than words. Hellstrom didn't move, his presence had an underlying unease even in silence. The air between the two if you seemed to thicken with every second. The seconds stretched as if the two of you were playing a careful game. Who caves in first?
It was a power move - the calculated pause.
You could sense Major's mind working and waiting for your move. Expecting you to maybe break quiet or - if you were going to be stubborn - stand in the tense silence.
He signed breaking the soundlessness. His eyes softening ever so slightly.
“How old are you again?” his hand slipping into his pocket as he asked.
“Uh… 24.” I answered.
“Good enough.” I looked at him confused. He took out a pack of cigarettes and a pen from his pocket. But before i could speak he asked again.
“Are you free tomorrow?” his voice not giving anything away wasn't helpful.
“Yes.” I looked up at his face as he took out a cigarette and started scribbling something on it. Only now you noticed how taller he was standing next to you. You furrowed your brows confused as he handed it to you. Your fingers traced against his as you took a cigarette from him.
“It’s an address, be there at seven.” he said as he walked back towards the entrance to café. As he passed by he was so close you could still smell the cigarettes and a hint of cologne.
“And dress nice.” he added with a smug smile cracking through his cold exterior.
Before you could answer he disappeared inside. You fidgeted with the cigarette feeling the excitement building up in your chest.
#dieter hellstrom#fluff#inglourious basterds x reader#inglorious basterds (2009)#inglourious basterds#inglorious basterds#dieter hellstrom x reader#august diehl#august diehl x reader#hellstrom#he had a cigarette with his number on it#lana del rey coded#Emmanuel Minieux
79 notes
·
View notes
Text
Elliot Rodger's search history !!! ૮ . . ྀིა
“This is an extremely small segment of internet history contained on the suspect’s laptop. A large volume of data was present in the suspect’s web browsers (Firefox and Microsoft Internet Explorer)” this is all according to the investigative summary
5/14/14
Xingjian railway station terrorist knife attack explosion bombing
Guangzhou train station knife attack
11/31/12
Philosophy of a knife
10/9/12
Did Adolf Hitler have a girlfriend
Adolf Hitler’s childhood
I’ve never had a female friend
Nazi anime
10/6/12
Are there knives so sharp that if you touch it you bleed
Stabbing incident
SRK survival rescue knife
10/5/12
Heinrich Himmler
Roommate takes very long showers
Young people are all mean
Joseph Goebbels has a jewis name
10/4/12
Modern torture devices
Spanish inquisition torture devices
If Hitler was born today
Blood elves are Nazis
Heinrich Himmler urban dictionary
Reincarnation of Hitler
10/2/12
If you were Adolf Hitler
10/1/12
Adolf Hitler narcicist
Adolf Hitler and the law of attraction
9/30/12
Shooting range los Angeles
Hitler’s speech
9/28/12
George sodini
9/27/12
Racism against Asian
Holocaust of black people
Nazi curbstomp
Elliot also had “extensive search history for luxury vehicles, video games, and celebrities.” He also apparently watched porn on 23 May 2014, the day of the massacre. (Reminds me of the dude who shot trump ngl cs apparently his last search was porn 💀)
115 notes
·
View notes
Text
Israel’s Enemies Tell Five Big Lies
Following the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, antisemites mount a series of vicious attacks, threats and malicious lies against Jews and Israel
With no shame or sign of humanity, the enemies of Israel have doubled down on their insistence that Israel is an illegitimate state that must be destroyed and that the savage slaughter of 1,200 innocent Jews was justified—all based on five “Big Lies” about the Jewish state.
What are the facts?
The world for Jews and Israel will never be the same. Wellesley College students receive official messages saying Zionists (i.e. most Jewish students) are not welcome in the school’s dorms. Hamas official Ghazi Hamad in a TV rant swears Hamas will repeat October 7 over and over until Israel is annihilated. West Bank Palestinian activist Ahed Tamimi says “What Hitler did to you was a joke—we will drink your blood and eat your skull.”
While Hamas’s October 7 atrocity shattered the hope of many Palestinian supporters, causing them to rethink their positions, the event only ignited an explosion of hate from other of Israel’s enemies. Tens of thousands of demonstrators made clear they no longer support two states living side by side in peace. Rather they demand “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free . . . by any means necessary”—meaning, clearly, slaughter of civilians.
Power of Big Lies: Though Israel was the victim of a mass murder of innocent Jews, its enemies blame the Jewish state—not only for the Hamas massacre, but also for responding in defense. The reasons many blame Israel for the atrocity are based on five Big Lies. Big Lies were used by Nazi leader Goebbels, who noted that if he told an outrageous lie often enough, people would begin to believe it. Alternatively, if you use truth as a basis for your judgments, you may these facts useful:
Lie #1: Israel is a colonial state that stole Palestinian land. A colonizer is a foreign nation that conquers and exploits another nation. First, the Palestinians have never controlled any land in Palestine: They were also never a nation. Nothing was stolen. Second, Jews are the indigenous people of the land of Israel. They have lived there continuously for 3,000 years and had two commonwealths for over 1,000 years: They are not foreigners. No colonial state.
Lie #2: Israel commits genocide. Genocide is the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group by killing its members. Israel does not, nor has ever, targeted innocent Palestinian civilians for killing—no mass murders, no pogroms. All Palestinian civilian deaths have occurred as collateral damage while fighting terrorists who hide in residential or other public areas. Tellingly, the population in in and around Israel has mushroomed since Israel’s founding in 1948—from about 700,000 to seven million today: Zero genocide.
Lie #3: Israel practices apartheid. Apartheid is a system of legalized racial segregation in which one racial group is deprived of political and civil rights. Israel has no laws or policies separating or limiting the rights of any of its citizens—including two million Arab-Israeli citizens—nor any Palestinians outside Israel. Political and civil rights of all Palestinians outside Israel are controlled by their respective dictatorships, who allow virtually no freedoms, such as speech or the vote. No apartheid.
Lie #4: Israel is committing war crimes. War crimes include torture, hostage taking, acts of terrorism, rape and intentional targeting of civilians. While Hamas committed all these acts on October 7, Israel commits none. Though some media bristle at what they consider excessive civilian deaths during Israeli military efforts, in fact, Israel attacks only military structures and personnel—never civilian-only targets. Unfortunately, Hamas places its fighters in dense residential areas or in tunnels beneath them, endangering civilians. No Israeli war crimes.
Lie #5: Israel brutally oppresses the Palestinians daily. Oppression is the malicious exercise of power to discriminate against some groups. Because Israel completely exited Gaza in 2005, it has no power over of the daily lives of Gazans. However, because of Hamas’s continuous terror, especially efforts to kill Jews and destroy the Jewish state, Israel and Egypt have placed Gaza under a strict blockade to prevent terror attacks. Likewise, because of the Oslo Accords, Israel and the Palestinian Authority share governance of Judea and Samaria (the West Bank). Thus, Israel plays virtually no role governing Palestinians daily lives and only enters Palestinian-controlled areas when terrorists flee to and hide in them. No oppression.
Above all, Israel and the U.N. have made numerous offers of land for an independent Palestinian state. Unfortunately, the Palestinians have turned down five offers of land for peace since 1948, three of them over the last 23 years. Apparently, their dream of conquering Israel “from the land to the sea” is more important.
The bestiality of the October 7 massacre shocked us—beheadings, incineration, rape, torture, heartless executions, brutal kidnappings. Even worse, the gates have opened to unlimited Jew hatred on American streets and campuses—to condoning savagery with the excuse of Palestinian liberation . . . based on utter lies about the Jewish state. But Hamas and the haters should know that “Never Again,” means fighting and defeating evil forever.
224 notes
·
View notes
Text
Mrs. Goebbels said to the children: "Children, don't be afraid, the doctor will now give you an injection that all children and soldiers will now receive." With these words she left the room.
8:40 p.m. (on May 1st). After 10 minutes, Mrs. Goebbels, accompanied by me, went into the children's room, where she stayed for about five minutes and placed a crushed ampoule of cyanide in each child's mouth. (Each glass ampoule contained 1.5 cm high 3 cyanide.) When we returned to the anteroom, she said: "Now it's all over."
Then I went with her down to Goebbels' study, where we found him pacing up and down the room in a very nervous state. As she entered the study, Mrs. Goebbels said: "It's over with the children, now we have to think about ourselves." Goebbels replied: "We have to hurry, because we have very little time." Then Mrs. Goebbels said: "Here in the We don't want to die in the bunker," and Goebbels added: "It's clear, we're going out into the garden." His wife replied: "Not into the garden, but to Wilhelmsplatz, where you have worked all your life." (Wilhelmsplatz is located between the Reich Propaganda Ministry building and the Reich Chancellery.) During the course of the conversation, Goebbels thanked me for making her fate easier, then he said goodbye to me, wishing me success in life and a happy return home.
Words of Dr. Helmut Kunz where he recounted the situation in the Führer's bunker before and after the murder of the children. He was arrested after the war and interrogated about the fate of the Goebbels family.
On May 2, 1945, in the center of Berlin, on the Wilhelmsplatz, lieutenant colonels and majors in the presence of Berlin residents - Germans Lange, Wilhelm, the chef of the Reich Chancellery, and Schneider, Karl, the garage master of the Reich. Office - at 5 pm someone discovered the charred corpses of a man and a woman. They were Joseph and Magda Goebbels. Two pistols Walther no. 1 (damaged by fire) lay at the head of the two bodies.
A singed gold cigarette case was discovered on the Frau Goebbels' body, a gold NSDAP party badge and a singed gold brooch were discovered on the body. In addition, when the cigarette case found with the woman's body was examined, the monogram “Adolf Hitler - 29. X. 34” in German was discovered on the inside of a lid; As Voß explained, the case had been used by Magda for the last three weeks. Voß recognized the charred female corpse as Magda Goebbels and justified his statement with the information that the female corpse was the corpse of Goebbels' wife due to its stature (a little over medium size) and because of the NSDAP's gold party badge. (Magda was the only German woman to wear this badge; it was presented to her by Hitler three days before his suicide.)
On May 3, 1945, the corpses of children were discovered. Children's corpses lying on beds in a separate room in the bunker of the Reich Chancellery. They were dressed in white nightgowns, the girls had ribbons in their hair.
To identify the bodies on site, the prisoners of war - the personal representative of Grand Admiral Dönitz in the Führer's headquarters, Vice Admiral Voß, Hans-Erich, born 1897, the garage master of the Reich Chancellery, Schneider, Karl Friedrich Wilhelm and the cook of the Reich Chancellery, Lange, Wilhelm – who knew Goebbels, his wife and children personally well. Vice Admiral Voß, Lange and Schneider clearly identified the corpses - during interrogation and when the corpses were presented - as Goebbels, his wife and children... On May 1st. J. saw Voss Goebbels for the last time at 8:30 p.m. in the air raid shelter where Hitler's headquarters was housed. Goebbels explained in a conversation with Voß that family would follow Hitler's example, they would end their lives by suicide.
When viewing the children's bodies, Voß identified all of them as Goebbels' children, as he had seen them several times; One of the girls, Goebbels' daughter Heide, who was four years old, had been to Voß's apartment several times with her parents.
53 notes
·
View notes
Text
new term: if you live in a western country and hate western countries so much that you support terror orgs that literally no one on either side support, i think you're a real Sir Mosley or a Biff.
Mosley was a the head of the British nazi party leading up to, during and after the second world war. He held office for a long time and had his own gang called the black shirts or "biff boys," he was married in goebbel's house in nazi germany and hitler was the guest of honor. hitler gave him an autographed picture as a wedding present.
Mosley is a real piece of shit. hated jews and continued to be a nazi well into the 1980s.
I hear leftist crow about how leftists pushed nazis out of london (they leave out the reason they were there was to target jews and jews were the main people fighting) in: THE BATTLE OF CABLE STREET.
it's one of the crown jewels in english speaking leftist spaces. let's remind them which side of the battle of cable street they really resemble.
the asshole himself
24 notes
·
View notes
Note
re: citing a Nazi: Gareth Jones, Holodomor. that bit. the guy only went to the Ukrainian SSR once, on the urging of Nazi propagandists, and personally had a wine and dine with Hitler and Goebbels. it's like three posts down from the anon
Lmaooooooo you really think you did something here, do you? Giving you the benefit of the doubt would be to assume that you are just stupid, and idk how stupid one has to be to say that.
First, Gareth Jones, a Welsh freelance reporter who was in Germany in the early 1930s, reporting on the Nazis coming to power, trying to analyze why it happened and reporting on the nazis beliefs to make the world understand how insane they were, and how horrible their methods were, warning about how dangerous those developments were, for Germany and for the rest of the world. He did interview Hitler and other high ranking pieces of shit at the time, to cite in his reporting. He was very explicitly not a nazi in any way, shape or form.
But thank you for prompting me to read some of his reporting, it's a fascinating look at the era.
Second, I wasn't even citing him - I mentioned him. I don't need to cite a Welsh reporter about something I know about from the actual survivors I grew up around. And from my friends' family stories. And of course there is plenty of academic research, but I wasn't citing any of that.
So no, I was not "citing a nazi". You, however, are showing yourself to lean too close to being either really ignorant, or a fascistic genocide denier.
69 notes
·
View notes
Text
Dean Obeidallah at The Dean's Report:
“The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check,” declared an angry JD Vance during the debate. This line perfectly sums up both Vance and Donald Trump. Both want to be able to lie non-stop in the pursuit of power. Both get angry when called out for their lies because they want to create an alternative reality that helps them. And both are following the authoritarian playbook. We all know the line, “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.” That law of propaganda--often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels—is the cornerstone of Trump’s MAGA movement. This quote instructively continues that “the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
Trump understands this instinctively. It’s why he dubbed any media story that criticized him “Fake news” so his supporters would believe him—and him alone—when it come to the truth. As President, Trump took it further in 2018 when he told people at event, “Don’t believe the crap you see from these people, the fake news,” adding jaw droppingly, “What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.” At the time the NY Times reported about these comments, “Trump is doubling down in his efforts to tell supporters to trust him over the words of critics and news reports.” This also explains why Trump supporters believe his “Big Lie” that the 2020 election was stolen. After four years of Trump telling them what was reality, they were primed to accept his lie that 2020 election was filled with fraud. And we are currently seeing Trump prepare his base for the same type of reaction after the 2024 election with his recent pronouncements “the only way we’re gonna lose” is “because they cheat.” This is also why Vance was angry after he spewed lies about Black immigrants in Springfield, Ohio that prompted CBS debate co-moderator to slightly push back. This exchange came when Vance peddled the lie that, “In Springfield, Ohio…we’ve brought in millions of illegal immigrants to compete with Americans for scarce homes.”
He then added, “The people that I'm most worried about in Springfield, Ohio, are the American citizens who have had their lives destroyed by Kamala Harris's open border.” After Tim Walz responded slamming Trump for submarining the bipartisan border security bill that would have addressed the issue and more, that is when co-moderator Margaret Brennan stated, “And just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status.” Brennan did not fact check the litany of other lies in Vance’s statement such as Harris had created “open borders” or that Harris “brought in millions of illegal immigrants,” etc. Brennan simply stated the truth that the Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio have legally entered the United States. Yet that comment angered Vance who believed that like at the CNN presidential debate, he should be able to use a national debate watched by millions to mislead the America public. At that point, Vance raised his voice to interrupt the co-moderators to bellow, “Margaret. The rules were that you guys were going to fact check.” From there Vance tried to bully the two female co-moderators by speaking over them to the point the microphones were shut off for a moment. That angered Trump and MAGA world. They understand that having a fellow candidate fact check Vance or Trump will be meaningless for many viewers because it appears to be just political rancor. But when a moderator of a respected network calls out a candidate’s lie in real time, it actually is effective at destroying the lie. [...] There should never be a presidential or vice-presidential debate in the future that does not feature real time fact checking. The candidates are not there to be journalists, but to share their vision for the nation. Fact checking after the debate is just about meaningless. But as we saw with the Harris-Trump debate, fact checking in real time flags to the viewers that a candidate is lying about basic facts. This is how we protect our Republic from people like Trump--who attempted a coup, incited the Jan 6 attack and was convicted of 34 felonies for cheating in the 2016 campaign—from ever being elected President.
JD Vance acted like an unhinged sexist bore last night when he got mad at the CBS moderators fact-checking him for spewing lies about the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio.
This also serves as to why moderators should fact-check candidates at the debates.
#2024 VP Debate#CBS News#CBS#2024 Presidential Election#2024 Elections#Margaret Brennan#Norah O'Donnell#J.D. Vance#Immigration#Springfield Cat Eating Hoax
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
Has anyone ever made a modern setting Reichblr AU?
It would be pretty funny if they were college roommates, Very likely is that Albert Speer is roommates with Hitler.
Hitler : Have you seen my art supplies???!!
Albert Speer : Nuh uh, I haven't (he actually stole it for an architecture project)
(After that incident, Hitler made a deal that they share their art supplies.)
Joseph Goebbels and Himmler are roommates, frenemies probably
Joseph : *Starts ranting about anything at all*
Himmler trying to study with his almost-broken headphones : SHUTTT UPPPP!!!
the worst thing is that they definitely call Goering the caseoh of the group (i hc him as a little bit chubby / most huggable person in the world) anyways I want to see at least one fan art or fan fiction about the inner circle in a modern setting au
I think Hitler would at least be an art student (finally) Albert would still be an architecture student, Goering would at least be an aviation student (considering ww1) Joseph Goebbels would be still be a philology student or any writing majors (ex: Poetry, Journalism, or even Philosophy), And all the others are still same majors, I would at least think that Hitler is a Reichblr fan (surprisingly) I feel like Dolfie is like a mix between Canadian and Asian? And Albert is German + Irish, Goering would be American (GRRAHHH) , Goebbels is surprisingly I think is an Asian more specifically Vietnamese, Himmler is European / Swedish, and Heydrich is deffss German.
I would love to think that they would have a group chat called the AVENGERS, Hitler would probably made the group randomly and called it a day, don't get me started with their genders + sexuality too 😭😭
33 notes
·
View notes
Note
if the Russians had caught Goebbels at the end of the war, they would surely have killed him or something similar, and what would have happened to the children and Magda? I believe you know those terrible stories about what the Russians did to women and children..so? thank you! i love your blog so much ❤️
If the Russians had captured Goebbels, he likely would have faced a brutal death, given his high rank in the Nazi regime. As for Magda and the children, their fate would have been grim. The Soviets were known for harsh reprisals, and Magda could have been subjected to severe punishment, possibly execution. The children, though innocent, might have been taken away or even killed, as revenge was often swift and brutal in the chaos of war. The tragic reality is that their situation, if captured, would have likely been filled with suffering. And thank you very much ♥️
#reichblr#joseph goebbels#ww2 germany#ww2 history#history#1930s#1940s#educational purposes#austrian painter#hermann goering
14 notes
·
View notes