See, I think the thing about deranged, toxic relationships in fiction, is that everyone involved has to actively choose to walk into or keep coming back to this relationship. That's the interesting part for me. What would make someone, against every single ounce of reason, decide that being in a relationship like that is genuinely worth it for them? Why would someone willingly put themselves in that situation? What has to be going on in their psyche? What do they get (or think they get) out of it?
If the toxicity is one-sided or one party is completely railroaded into the relationship at every turn until they finally cave, or there's some outside force trapping both of them in the relationship and they don't actually want to be there, that's not particular interesting to me, personally.
(Obviously, other people can disagree with this; people have a wide variety of opinions and ways they engage with fiction, which is good, actually. I'm simply talking about my own thoughts.)
2 notes
·
View notes
so yeah, i havent watched either dawntrail trailer 🤷
idk im finding it kinda hard to get excited about it at the constant reminders that they fridged one of their best and relevant characters back in azys lla, the clumsy handling of the void, the rancidly misogynistic shit in pandae, the solely white examples for the new lighting engine, the telling lack of info regarding femhroths that just screams disinterest because women, how absolutely terrible this could go because No i Do Not want road to el dorado references because idc if you guys are endeared to it that shit was racist
like on a more serious note, how am i supposed to get excited about an expansion where our summer vacation is getting mixed in with a different nation's political affairs when we're mostly fantasy europeans (excluding the variable of the wol but even then most are white eorzeans) and tural is fantasy mesoamerica. how am i supposed to be excited about this touristy angle when tourism is a major facet of colonization, especially when it regards the cultures that this region is based in. so framing you getting mixed up in yet another rite of succession from a culture you - in all likelihood - are not affiliated with as a summer vacation is just. it's deeply uncomfortable and it's hard to feel excited about this - especially with their history, continued bullshit, and refusal to remove egregious stuff like the "new world" set or the far northern attire.
idk. i wanna be wrong, but it's hard to be excited when the continuation of stuff they're Saying they'll address is right in front of us. the au ra showcased were pasty with blond hair and im p sure blue eyes and it was raen, not xaela - are they really that allergic to anything darker than a light tan? locations gorgeous, but I still see gifs everywhere of meteor fighting that mamool'ja leader - what happened to portraying them as people and not as monsters to take down? i only know that mamool ja's station because i know who the mamool ja are and the significance of large, two-headed ones. to most, that looks like a run of the mill dungeon boss since there Is a mamool ja boss, and the framing is similar to any number of inhuman adversaries shown in previous trailers. but if they're doing better about cultural sensitivity, then why did they make a member of their indigenous stand-in group be the big enemy for meteor to showcase Viper combat against? i really hope that - contextually - it's not something bad, but out of context it really just looks like taking down a big reptile monster which isnt great when that's your indigenous stand-in that's been portrayed like SHIT since ARR and hasn't had the same redeeming grace as the majority tribes - because where the amalj'aa are characterized by military strength and the noble savage trope, the mamool ja are portrayed as spineless mercenaries and sexual creeps. if we're in the mamool ja reframing expac, why does the trailer showcase that.
god dammit. i want to be wrong!!! i want to be overreacting because this would suck if true but their history doesnt give much confidence that they'll do better, and their current actions - the tourism angle, the lack of info with femhroths, the lighting engine - arent much to be confident about either!!
i wanna be wrong so fucking badly but i dont trust this team as far as i can throw them.
7 notes
·
View notes
I stumbled upon the post of you talking about how you're trying to raise a son that won't hate himself for being male. From a young man to the mother of a young man, thank you. Honestly thank you so much. That will mean so so much for your kiddo, both now and for the rest of his life. I hope your mother's day is a joyous one :)
oh anon, many many hugs. and thank you. I hope you don't hate yourself either, you seem like a really kind and caring person. <3
16 notes
·
View notes
watched saw for the first time and my god
Kinda alot to unpack but it was a really good movie. 10/10
5 notes
·
View notes
Henry anon: he was very much referring to Fritz’s younger brother, I do remember that
Schwedt lived until 1788, but I'm not sure what they would generally call him in texts of that era. 1730 texts do call him Prince Henry, but I guess nobody would mix him up with four year old Henri back then...
I dragged up an online copy of Thiebault in English and skimmed over the part that covers the trial and uh... Boy does he get some stuff wrong. That stuff's gone through the rumor mill quite a few times.
The version that I've found says something about Kattes rising in ranks/getting good positions in "the court of Prince Henry" and Fritz only honoring them by not persecuting them? Not sure if advancing into positions counts as special treatment, the Kattes were generally well to do and successful in their respective careers before and after the trial. Fritz did make Hans Heinrich a count, if anything that might count for special treatment? He also made him Generalfeldmarschall, so he did give him a high position too? Hans Heinrich was already pretty far up in his career by 1730 and did stuff like host the ex-King of Poland in the 30s, kinda hard to keep that career down in any case. Hans Hermann's brothers didn't make it past Rittmeister, but that was only because they murdered each other in their 20s (Thiebault doesn't seem to know they ever existed). The cousins were pretty successful in the military too (probably not out of sympathy for their one cousin's death, one of them was involved in the whole thing after all), so I honestly don't quite get what Thiebault is on about :'DD
As for the A.D.C. part, do we have a proper source with that title? Kloosterhuis mentions Katte as "Begleiter" of both Schwedts, FW Schwedt in 1726 and Henry Schwedt in Zeithain in 1730, but nothing past that (and both sound travel-related and temporary)
5 notes
·
View notes
You will be warm when you die
You will be held
I’ll coo soft words in your ear
And gently preen your feathers
At the end of your life, I
will keep you dry
and make sure the kids aren’t too loud
You’ll curl into the shape of my palm
I promise to sing to you
A song about soaring
And hiccup from crying between verses
But i know you won’t mind
You’re going to chirp softly and close your eyes
As I enchant with a lullaby of starry skies
And my heart will skip a beat when you stop nodding along
But I’ll keep singing your song till it is done
My father will tell me to wash my hands
And erase any trace of you
“It might have had the flu” he’ll beg
but this hour is dedicated to you
because when you die you’ll be held and warm
and your feathers will be preened and
I’ll sing you your song
because i refuse to let you die alone
1 note
·
View note