#which is a valid interpretation too
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Purely sharing just cuz I think it's funny so don't go looking for anyone over this: I think I got subtweeted on here once from a Hellblazer fan who didn't like how I interpreted the canon Golden Boy storyline (because who else talks about Goldie as much as I do) and someone replied saying "comic fans read comics challenge" and I just have to laugh. Like that's so deeply funny.
Ah yes do point to me the many cartoons, tv shows, movies, and video games that feature iconic recurring Vertebrae Hellblazer rogue The Golden Boy. Do tell me what beautiful Lestat-esque actor they got to play as my guy in the Keanu movie or Legends of Tomorrow or the NBC show. Because I clearly don't read the comics right. I'm a pleb who only interacts with the sanitized shallow adaptations of this character. I should read the original source material! And stop basing ideas of this popular character on fanon, how foolish of me.
Anyway I take all this in good faith, I know there's a lot of teens on here who just kind of lash out and act gatekeepy over their white man blorbo- they don't need a 30 year old author on them. Just chill out, we're all here to have fun. But I can find humor in these things haha.
#ramblings#i think they were mad that I said John womb-killed his twin? like you're allowed to have a diff interpretation! but mine is valid too#real johnstantine human being Sting had the same take away as me#i think they went ahead and compared me to john's abusers which is too funny to be mad at. ah kids#again don't find this person i do not endorse bullying. i just wanted to demonstrate āfans should read comicsā usually means#āu didn't leave with my interpretation so you're wrongā and how funny the logic breaks when a character only exists in the comics
66 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
I really donāt think itās insane or a stretch to see Mikage as an akio like figure
Like yes, hes not really an adult, I see him as 18, but heās on that cusp, technically he is an adult but in reality he isnāt, I see him as this sort of failed dios type of character
Like Akio uses Anthy, Mikage uses Mamiya as an excuse for his actions, as an excuse for his want for eternity, and with Mamiya being a parallel (and in the end being anthy) it makes the connection even more clear to me
Their relationship is subtle, and whilst I donāt think Mikage did anything to the REAL Mamiya the way he acts with the fake one is very telling, the finger kiss, the scene where Mamiya is putting his clothes back on and mikage says heās better suited as a rose BRIDE and not a rose groom, it clearly tells a story esp with Mamiya clearly being younger (probably around 14 since the parallel with anthy would make sense for them to be the same age) to me, their relationship tells a predatory image similar to that of Akio and Anthy
Not only this but the structure of the story too, Akioās car scenes replacing the elevator scenes, I think it all adds up
I also believe heās this sort of foreshadowing to Akio in the third arc, the scenes line up too much
Like Akio as Dios, Mikage is no longer the person he once was as professor Nemuro, the only difference is that Mikage ultimately failed because he couldnāt connect with others the way Akio could, he canāt successfully manipulate others the way he can, though you could also say the same about Akio in the end too
#i donāt understand why so many utena fans get so defensive over him#i think this is a valid interpretation given everything#like obviously you dont HAVE to agree but so many people just completely shut it down when likeā¦You rlly dont have too#I feel like the utena fanbase rlly doesnt like it when you have other interpretations than the typical#I think its also do to ppl projecting onto mikage a lot so not wanting to see him as negatively as an akio-like figure#which is fine#i really do get it but its just frustrating to see sometimes#rei says stuff#revolutionary girl utena#shoujo kakumei utena#utena#mikage souji#souji mikage#rgu#might delete idk#just wanted to get my thoughts out
16 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
excuse me, you recently related a post with a tag asking if people remembered when people cared about recoining things and Iāve been thinking about it and Iām wondering if you meant that caring about recoining was good or bad?
We dislike re-coining. I don't have the spoons to explain the full part of it, but it mostly comes down to our more general criticisms of the extent of individualism in the MOGAI community (recoins, especially when they are of terms that have already been coined many times, often feel as though they are disregarding the contributions of other coiners, as well as ignoring the community symbol purpose of flags) and it feels disrespectful to the work of archivists. Every time we see another gender related to the song I/Me/Myself by Will Wood and nothing else, we feel like our work and our efforts in not only preventing terms from being lost as well as making them so easy to search for is, uh. Pointless. Not valued. We've spoken about this with some other archivists who have said they feel the same.
There are five (5) genders related to that song on our blog alone, by the way, and that's only counting the ones that have no other specifications. There are also five (5) related to the album Everything Is A Lot, and four (4) related to the song Thermodynamic Lawyer, and four (4) related to The Normal Album. Again, this is only counting ones without any other specifications, and are only the ones posted on our blog. This is a regular thing.
#We have bigger criticisms of the MOGAI community. This one is rather minor at the end of the day.#We thus don't make posts about it. We'll complain about it in semi-public but we won't post about it publicly.#We also are still mulling over something rabidbatboy said once while we discussed it and trying to re-evaluate#our thoughts with that comment in mind. Which wasā why should someone have to be the first#to get to coining a term for an experience for their interpretation of it to be considered the most...#Valid? For lack of a better word? Valid really isn't the right word here. Authentic maybe.#It's a multi-faceted topic and we wish we'd had the mental capacity as of late to really think about it#since we think it's fascinating and we like discussions like this.#We have a lot of criticisms of the MOGAI community. We love MOGAI so incredibly deeply and thus we#criticise. What was it that Sojourn said? How shallow it would beā for us to love without opinion.#We are generally a petty person. We have a perception of ourself as being an utter asshole and while we're repeatedly#told that we are notā this perception persists nonetheless. As a result we... I completely lost track of this thought#because I was too busy laughing at the body's mum's reaction to seeing the whole ham that weā alongside#our brotherā bit directly intoā repeatedlyā extensively. She took so long to notice. What was I saying?#I have completely lost this damn thought. Going to keep the tags about it in case I remember later and can finish the thought.#I don't actually know if this answers your question.#Please look up Will Wood things before you coin a Will Wood thing thank you.#Ask#Anon#{you're not posting this long fucking ramble in the tags without noting who you are#Fine. For our own referenceā this post written by Jon arn Jonathan of PV. Happy system anniversary to me.
14 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
being a zelinker that enjoys nuance and the pairing not being the sole focus of this series is like being killed by rocks. I can only imagine how it feels like for ganon mains
hahaha well yeah I feel like. I don't mind Zelink at all, especially in certain games, and I love them having this special transcendant bond; but I feel like people who do insist Zelda games are about Zelink and nothing else, and having any other kind of HC about what their relationship means is akin to blasphemy is not that encouraging for creative interpretations overall.
#asks#thanks for the ask!!#NOT tagging this with the pairing tag because I'm scared#I guess this is partially me not being into hyper-devoted pairings as aspirational#it's partially just squicks and just not feeling connections to the knight and his lady as a straightforward uncomplicated thing#and yeah I feel like this interpretation will be --almost by nature-- uninterested in ganon as a guy#since he's mostly there to be an obstacle between young pure perfect love#so the more you complicate him and the less the focus can be on that pairing because it might complicate this relationship#which in this context isn't what you want#again completely fine and valid interpretation tbh! it's just a bit of a stretch to say the games are About this relationship imo#zelda games are about a lot of things simultaneously! and sometimes it's About Zelink (I'd argue TotK and SkSw might be)#but if you take TP?? they respect each other but I'd be pressed to call that any sort of relationship (link is a wolf for most of it too)#ALBW they meet for maybe 5 minutes#so yeah it depends#I actually like that their relationship has this flexibility#that it can look different and mean different things#it makes it deeper and more powerful than if they were just following the perfect romantic steps of Knight and Princess#at least to me!
14 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
feel like some people donāt comprehend that partially the point of tbosas is that you can sympathize with Coryo. It never excuses his actions nor does it try to, but itās way more complicated than Coryo just being āpsychoā
#more on this when I post my notes from the book#it just irks me a little some of the interpretations Iāve seen but to each#their own#I just feel like coryo is a human and humans are complicated#at least from what Iāve read like I can obviously pick out the odd behavior and thoughts from him but at the same time#thereās parts of his thoughts that are so like#relatable and expected for someone in his circumstance#and I do think coryo and katniss mirror one another which is a whole other thi nd#thing#IDK#someone tell me you get me#because I just keep seeing so much about coryo being like straight evil the whole time and I donāt think thatās right and it does Suzanneās#character work an injustice#also I do think he thinks he has a superiority over lucy gray and a sense of ownership but#it still feels more complicated than that#like itās so clearly connected to his trauma of losing his mother and seeking out validation and love too#and thatās coming out in a toxic way instead of an actual love#god#kit talks#tbosas#coriolanus snow
29 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
thats at least how i remember it. riverdale comes out in 2017 and tumblr asexuals tore it to pieces bc they were mad jughead was getting bitches.
#bc in a more modern archie comics book jughead was assxual so they were acting like it was the only valid interpretation#which like. cmon now theres nothing wrong w wanting to see him that way but that was like 1 jughead#there are simply too many jugheads. for you to say its aphobic that they arent all like the one from a mid 2010s comic#mosts
5 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
If Annie's nose grew longer whenever she denied her feelings for Armin, how long would her nose be?
honestly, I feel like Annie doesn't deny her feelings for Armin, at least not to herself. maybe she'd avoid divulging her feelings to other characters to avoid ridicule?
I think Annie is pretty honest with herself when it comes to her feelings for Armin, and so her nose would remain its original length :P
#tbh annie's pretty bad at hiding her feelings from other characters too (e.g. mikasa)#experiencing her feelings instead of staying numb (which she did as a Marleyian warrior) is new to her & therefore hard to conceal#at least that's my perspective! it's not totally clear in canon so other interpretations are valid too#annie leonhart#aruani#annie leonhardt
8 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
///
#I've just been having to accept the fact my interpretation of iwtv amc is just different than the stated majority and thats ok...#I have my evidence and analysis to back it up too and the majority interpretation is fine just I... biasedly I suppose... know mine's#the one I understand it to be... And so I don't have much interest in the other. Let alone other off shoots I find wrong.#I respect it and see it though like it's valid as an interpretation usually.#In fact a lot of my own interpretation is really not too removed from the main ways it gets interpreted either#just rather robustly more in depth than I see and asking maybe better questions#Also not particularly interested in posting what my interpretation is... at this time.#because I am not particularly interested in being inundated with argument about it. that's not really how I want to engage this work.#My interpretation isn't something problematic mind as I usually come to analysis of things from a background of versed understanding#leftist theory feminist and queer theory media theory disability rights psychology philosphy history the systems of oppression and so on#I don't solidly draw my own conclusions as correct unless I can back it basically#Also I understand part of my personal interpretation is just that - personal. And that other interpretations are just as fine to have. Find#this tendency of full combatting ppls other perfectly textually valid interpretations because of an assumed 'correct' one to be very tiring#Which is really just fueling my disinterest in sharing mine further.
3 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
I didn't get a chance to vote on the poll, but also noticed what would have been my answer wasn't there so I'm writing it in now- I personally see it as he's their CREATOR first, manager second. They don't call him manager in a lot of materials, and they also don't call him father, they call him "Captain" or "sir," (this being pulled from largely the additional voice actor's portrayals at least, which I think are worth at least considering in a wider scope of interpretation)
That feels like the title or nickname he'd prefer they use, hence programming them TO use it for him- and that betrays neither fatherly intent nor producer intent, but pre-existing intent he didn't change (lifting from prior coding) or that he preferred. Beyond that he definitely refers to them as troops- it is their aesthetic, but it's more impersonal
the items you get for the lore on 1010 are toys, and while it's not stated, I've always thought there was an implication that he had made them- His relationship then isn't one of a father to sons, but of a creator about his creations, which IS different. It's why he's as willing to literally throw them at you in combat and, simultaneously, seemingly instinctively, puts a hand out in front of himself to protect them when the final attack is coming- even if they are tools to some degree, he MADE them what they are and he's PROUD of that- He doesn't want to see his work destroyed
Obviously this gets increasingly more complicated if you believe that 1010 gain sapience of some degree, but I still think the relationship isn't quite what I'd call fatherhood. He is simultaneously all the family they have and deeply, inherently unlike them- yet there is undeniably pieces of him and influences from him present in them, because every creation will reflect its creator in some way, in ways they can't even predict
Then, y'know, yeah, it's being a manager time. Ultimately he's gotta organize them and tell them what to do- how he feels about that could be a variety of ways, but he is doing it nonetheless, so something about it matters to him as well- likely the vow to serve the city thing, if leading a boyband is the way to ensure the lights stay on, then he's going to do it 'till his heart gives out.
To start, I do think you're getting a little caught up in the semantics of the poll, but since you're making the case that "creator" is different from "father," I'll hear you out.
And tbh, I really like that interpretation. It's a little more nuanced from what I'm used to seeing, and it is giving me something to sink my teeth into.

I do differ in that I don't think Neon J. personally made the toys or the base 1010: I felt like the implication of the MKI - MKIII standee was that 1010 has actually been around since the wartime era, since MKI 1010 are build more similarly to the recycled battlebots in the Metro Division. Parallel to that, I think it's implied that Neon J. is a cyborg due to suffering injuries in the war. Since they appeared to exist at the same time, it seemed more likely to me that 1010 and NJ's body originated from the same source, but not that NJ was necessarily the direct creator of either them or the toys. (Though, I will admit that knowing that the toy company is called "J-1" does imply that he has something to do with it. But to rectify that, I'm gonna say that he just bought out the company/factory, but he didn't start them.)
But that's just an argument of history. Both interpretations can still lead to the "creator" theory in the sense that NJ still views 1010 impersonally, but still fondly. Even if he didn't make the base, he still turned them into what they are today, which is still a lot of hard work and dedication to the craft.
It's not making him out to be this overly sentimental guy (which is ultimately what I dislike about most "father first" interpretations), but he's also not heartless, and I like that. It's retaining what many interpretations (including mine, sadly) sometimes miss out on, and that's that he's an artist, just like all the other stars. He values his craft, and 1010 are the result of that, for better or worse.
#nsr#no straight roads#1010#neon j#gbunny responds#thanks for the good meal~#it's been a while since someone's sent in some interesting analysis#i'm a little too stuck with what i've got to change my own headcanons#but i genuinely really like this take#so i'm gonna go ahead and file it into my brain as 'valid 1010 opinions'#which i will promptly do nothing with but will make me happy when i think about it~#tbh. i stick with the 'father' interpretation because it gives me the platform to explore generational trauma and the cycle of abuse#that is the whole point of NJ/white/green's horrible relationship#i made him a father just so he can be absent#BUT if you take away that angle then there's a better platform for discussing NJ's war-trauma with more focus#because if he doesn't see them has his kin#then he doesn't have the obligation to 'raise' them nor do they have the obligation to expect it#so whatever 1010 are becomes more a reflection NJ's psyche#which i think is a great angle to come from#it's juicy. i'm into it~
22 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Sleepless in New York at 6am, the neighborhood breakfast attempts to express a coherent thought about an incoherent nag of his past ten years
#Toast Talks#Writer Stuff#Death of the Author#I'm too sleep deprived to be certain but right now this feels like it makes sense#This is the sort of thing I'm talking about to when I say āIt's okay to be wrongā about random shit because in some instances it is#Because being right literally doesn't matter all of the time. Or even a lot of the time#Meaning derived from fiction is a perfect example of that#Right and wrong interpretations technically exist just as the answer to the question āis color realā technically has a definitive answer#But the point is that it doesn't actually matter one way or another#So to assert validity on either side is a losing game because you're both equally right and equally wrong#The author's interpretation is the only one that's technically correct but that doesn't make yours incorrect#Because it's not the point and you're missing the forest for the trees overthinking the situation and focusing solely on irrelevant nonsens#Just like a philosopher#The author isn't dead they just don't care and didn't ask what your interpretation is#All they really want to know is how it changed or moved you#Anything more is self-aggrandizing bullshit at best - regardless who is arguing the validity of which
2 notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
BTTWS thought: I don't quite know what the consensus is for the song being about, but I kind of wonder if it is partially sort of her accepting/grieving losing the dreams she had based on it being on her depression playlist and how it speaks to a specific type of loss even if the loss is the idea of those things.
I'm not sure if there is a consensus because obviously songs are up for interpretation, and I think it's one of those things we just end up leaving to personal experience on main.
I will say that I can easily see how it's read as the loss of the person you were or hoped you'd be, or the dreams you had for your future, and that's a totally valid personal interpretation of it. (That was my interpretation of it on my first few listens of Midnights, actually, though it's changed since then.)
I've written a few posts about BTTWS, but my tl;dr about it is that whatever the actual inspiration for it was, the resounding theme out of it is grief and loss, and is part of the overarching "what if?" of Midnights. (Unfortunately Tumblr's search function is garbage so I can't find them but this was one and so is this one about grief.) I wrote a long-ass essay about the 3am tracks, but one of the things that jumped out to me was that WCS, for instance, is about losing one's faith, and BTTWS is partially about how one deals with loss again when that faith is already long gone.
I do absolutely think the song was on the Depression playlist for a reason (and I think I've posted about that numerous times lol) and the loss of a future you'd dreamed of is probably right on the money *broadly speaking*, which is a theme that is so prevalent on TTPD. As I've also said, TTPD is mainly an album about grief (of all kinds) and that is the song on Midnights that I think is the entry point into understanding TTPD. (Because grief in whatever form it comes in and in whatever origin can cause an avalanche of consequences on your life.)
#Pouring out my heart to a stranger but I didn't pour the whiskey#Anonymous#I am putting this in the tags in invisible ink but: I think the origin story of the song is... perhaps something else#(e.g. its origin is not mourning the person *you'd* become which is what I mentioned in the post)#(but something else entirely)#BUT I think it's totally valid to still personally interpret the song as that (mourning the person you wanted to be if x hadn't happened)#for yourself because loss is loss and grief is grief#and it hollows you out from the inside and that's what the song is capturing#anyway i'm flying too close to the sun so I'll leave it there#i'm treading lightly because ~reasons~ but.#bttws#bigger than the whole sky#<- maybe tumblr will remember I have other posts on my blog about this if i tag it#cause i know that it's delicate
5 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
365 Days of Poems: Day 6 (January 6th)
Godly Poison
I sowed and cultivated these plants myself
I brought them to life to bear fruit and flower
with my own bare hands and the loving patience of a proud parent
angel wings
autumn crocus
belladonna
calla lily
daphne
death camas
doll's eyes
foxglove
hemlock
larkspur
laurel
monkshood
moonflower
moonseed
mountain arnica
oleander
pokeweed
privet
ruti
snakeweed
and when the tide told me the time was right
I prepared and presented a feast full of my children
to Him
He who
says what He ought not say
touches what He ought not touch
takes what He ought not take
I admit
I took pleasure in His pain
as He once did with mine
blood pouring from His mouth
His body thrashing and convulsing in his chair
fear and sheer terror invading His wide eyes
I smiled through it all
and when his heart finally stopped
mine soared and I finally felt free
I know
one day
I'll be forgiven for what I had to do
and I know
He is not destined for any kindness
in the next life
- - - - -
Here's the link to the corresponding writing prompt post
#so ive gotten really far behind with posting these#lowkey ive been so focussed with just writing the poems (which i initially do by hand) that ive been putting off posting them#ive currently written all the way through the 14th but i do plan on writing at least one poem after posting this one#so yeah im gonna try to get caught up with posting the poems here soon#as for this poem there are multiple ways to interpret it and i feel all can be correct#i had a specific idea in mind while writing this but as i kept writing i saw more possibilities#so whatever you interpret is valid#that being said this is a fairly violent poem and its not really up to interpretation that murder takes place#anyway what happen on the 6th was that my girlfriend and i went to the house to do laundry#other than that i dont think we did too much#thanks for reading#writing#writer#creative writing#writing prompt#poem#poetry#writeblr#trying to be a writeblr at least#*happened#edit: my girlfriend and i actually got eye exams on this day (cant believe i forgot)
2 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Funniest thing ever ever forever is when a popular bully desperately tries to get me to like them but fails miserably
#this one girl was sitting ON my table going like āwhyyy dont u like me im just trying to be friends with youā#like ??? take the hint idk mind you im cool w her friends and they just gave me some genuine pity looks#so i just told her that i don't like her really loud and she was like āwhyyyyā#and then EYE was like because u bother ppl!!! u bother ppl who clearly do not wanna be bothered#and the look on her face i gen almost feel bad#like is she insecure ???? does she feel weird because im cool with everyone else but her???#which is valid of me btw considering she's kinda mean#but i feel a little bad about it cause she just walked off and said loudly in a pity way to her friends like#āguyssss he doesn't like me even though im just trying to be friendsā#because like i know what shes doing because i do it too sometimes#like making everything you say a performance for everyone around you#if you're good at it and you do it effortlessly then its easy but obviously it takes a bit of mental energy#and you keep doing it because it gives you positive validation from other ppl yk#so i empathize with her sort of I mean i feel bad a little bit#whatever maybe i interpreted it wrong and she's just mean. idk lol#ben's conscious stream#ben highschool hours
2 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Thatās why you do need to do your research and come with questions - a part of that research does need to be ensuring your doctor doesnāt have an opinionated stance on medicine beyond what is best for their patient.
It is telling about the discourse though that you claim withholding of care is a huge issue and conservatives claim over abundance of care (and lack of proper āchecksā) is an issue. Iād believe you before them, for the record! Most experience Iāve seen tells me you are right. But we really need to be careful how we talk about these things.
Systemic processes, and guidelines of care in medicine, are important and are gained through hard lessons. Doctors need to be the ones establishing them, but they need to be doing it in a way that doesnāt allow personal bias to interfere. Research has to be the guide, and right now, that is usually the case. The reason trans care is under addressed is because it is a minority situation - and we need to improve that. Absolutely. (Publicizing healthcare and medical research would be a nice start)
We just canāt play into conservative narratives, and this attack on legitimate scientific reasoning, in the process. Doctors are biased, human, and make mistakes. Thereās a lot of things that need fixing in the field. But they donāt tend to be malicious on purpose - and they absolutely arenāt government agents intent on ruining todays youth, or whatever the hell line conservative outlets try to sell.
yes, doctors suck, but also "the medical ethics and patient interaction training doctors receive reinforces ableism" and "the hyper competitive medical school application process roots out the poor, the disabled, and those who would diversify the field" and "anti-establishment sentiment gets applications rejected and promotions requests denied, weeding out the doctors on our side" and "the gruesome nature of the job and the complete lack of mental health support for medical practitioners breeds apathy towards patients" and "insurance companies often define treatment solely on a cost-analysis basis" and "doctors take on such overwhelming student loan debt they have no choice but to pursue high paying jobs at the expense of their morals" are all also true
none of this absolves doctors of the truly horrendous things they say and do to patients, but it's important to acknowledge that rather than every doctor being coincidentally a bad person, there is something specific about this field and career path that gives rise to such high prevalence of ableist attitudes
and I WILL elaborate happily
#I hope that clarifies!#your point is valid#itās just not what I was talking about#I also donāt want op to think I disagree bc I def donāt!#I just hear too much discourse about medical science on the right#and if we arenāt careful how we engage#we risk feeding into that#just want people to see doctors as a profession worth having and respecting#which this post 100% does not discourage if you interpret it correctly
22K notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
the stars aligned in my personality so that everything i convey is either a warped version of what was intended something blatantly different
#based off what the earth sees you would think i have a lethargic personality#or that i dont react with extreme emotional volatility#and in the same vein that i dont give a shit about anyone or their problems#its not that i dont care about someones issues specifically#i lack that ability in general#i can look back at something i was feeling a minute prior and not relate to it at all#yet somehow at the same time#im hyperfixated on myself#almost everything that i dont grow tired of could be vaguely described as progressing a skill whether literally or metaphorically#and an overwhelming majority of my mental depends on if im progressing/have already mastered#i am self absorbed to the point of brain neglecting everything else and allocating said energy towards my shit#i really dont care about human interaction at all except for the select few that i would truly label as close which lifetime is MAYBE 3#and although rare for someone to be affected i hate when it does end up doing that#i dont want people to see me not empathizing and interpret it as not seeing their issue as valid#it is not personal i just am incapable of displaying that#if i dont feel any sort of self pity how am i supposed to feel for external issues i have no experience with#me being super tunnel visioned doesnt make it any easier#and add on the fact that i cant directly convert emotions into actual communication only thoughts#i have no idea how to genuinely compliment or express discontentment with anything#any idea my brain conjures up is some forced unnatural line like#āi really like that its so cool and awesomeā ācome on dude really what a bummerā#only thing i sometimes say is āi hate thatā but having one reaction isnt really better than having none#not at all unexpected since i havent put any effort to gain experience doing that nor do i really want to#i cant really put out anything that i couldnt take in#the times that i have been complimented i just think ok i guess#what am i supposed to do with that i dont even agree with the compliment#as i looked at this several hours after forgetting about it i fell victim to what i said#āi can look back at something i was feeling a minute prior and not relate to it at allā#dont even really want to post it anymore but it was too much typing to not post
0 notes
Text
Honestly this gets at my chiefest complaint/frustration/discomfort with fandom as a whole. Which is: in their rush to defend the artistic merit of fanworks I think a ton of people have really valorized transformation and remixing and reinterpretation in and of themselves, when imo those are all quite neutral actions. When done well, they can expand and build upon and subvert meaning in really powerful and thought-provoking (and fun!) ways. When done poorly, they are just as likely to flatten and oversimplify and decontextualize and completely erase meaning. The simple act of changing something does not imbue the choice to do so with creative validity. It is entirely possible for a cover song to be bad (or just boring!). To exactly the same degree that it is possible to transform a pretty shallow and straightforward work into something deeper and more nuanced and subversive, is possible to transform a work into a vastly shallower and less interesting shadow of itself. As with nearly everything in art, it's all about the execution!
But the second you voice this position (which should honestly be a pretty uncontroversial one imo), you get people shrieking at you about being gatekeep-y and pretentious and betraying the sacred fandom etiquette of Don't-Like-Don't-Read.
And like...listen. I was not raised in a barn. I am 150% capable of quietly back-buttoning out of a fanfic I think is bad or boring - which is exactly what I do when I encounter them - and I am obviously not advocating for stupid ships wars or any kind of harassment or leaving hatemail in people's AO3 inboxes. (Which some people will also accuse you of the second you say anything less than lavishly positive about fandom, in true piss-on-the-poor fashion.) Literally all I am saying is that you can't have your cake and eat it too - that if fandom and fanworks (in the broadest sense) have artistic merit then fandom and fanworks (in the broadest sense) are fair game for artistic critique. Which means, in practice, that I can go on my own blog and make a post exactly like this one - critiquing broad trends, or stating that some interpretations are bad actually, or pointing out that subverting or talking back to or reading against the grain of canon is very different from simply ignoring it, or saying "fandom's culture of collage/remix/fuck-canon-I-do-what-I-want can lend itself to to really creative and interesting art but also to a lot of really bland homogenized cut-n-paste art, not to mention some pretty troubling decontextualization." And that if you feel this rains on your personal parade, you are then free to DLDR by back-buttoning out of my blog and/or blocking me so you never have to see my hot takes again, rather than clamoring in my notes about how I should let people enjoy things.
#i am enjoying myself! if my preferred mode of fannish engagement is different than yours you can go nobody is stopping you#i'm just tired of people acting like chucking canon out the window only ever leads to beautifully subversive queer romance#just as often it leads to people chucking out anything unique or challenging or thought-provoking in the original text#in favor of making two personality-less background white guys kiss to the tune of plot beats we've all seen 10 billion times#i'm not even condemning anyone for enjoying a tropey low stakes romance sometimes!#but i AM allowed to observe that fandom has a marked preference for tropey low stakes romance#over (eg) touching ANY canon engagement with imperialism with a thirty foot pole#and to like. draw some critical conclusions about that lol#fandom#my posts
2K notes
Ā·
View notes