#we also need to understand what they are used for in educational medical scientific settings

[icanarachnid]

edit: For some reason, I was reminded of this: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2024/press-release/

and this https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/press-release/

[beguines]

As neoliberalism has infected higher education, research on "mental health issues" in the academy has become increasingly conservative. My own subject area, sociology, is as guilty as any other. We have lost sight of what it means to think critically about the mental health system, to be able to challenge the work of the psy-professions, to interrogate meaningfully the production of knowledge claims on "mental disease," and to adequately contextualise the expansion of the psychiatric discourse with reference to theoretical sets of ideas which refer to labelling, power, and social control. We have effectively become pseudo-social psychologists whose research agenda is passed down to us by state agencies, requiring us to do little more than identify marginalised groups who can be labelled and policed by the psychiatric authorities and the criminal justice system. Having a once proud tradition of highlighting the systematic, oppressive practices of the mental health system, the sociology of mental health is now in severe danger of simply becoming another arm of the state. Far too much of what passes for "research" in the discipline is flawed from the beginning: it takes for granted that the mental health system is a fundamentally caring, scientifically sound discipline; it accepts mental illness diagnoses as valid and having a proved aetiology; and the empirical lens is focused outward on "undetected" pathologies in the general population rather than inward on the pathological behaviour of the institution of psychiatry and its allies. The result is that we end up with sociological research and scholarship which perpetuates the myths of psychiatric knowledge and aids the expansion of psychiatric hegemony (how many times have we read at the conclusion of such articles and books that there is a gap—an "unmet need"—in current mental health provision for which further resources and staffing is required?).

Thus, we need to resist the top-down state-run agenda and reject funding streams that tie us into conservative, surveillance-focused projects. We also need to be vocal in challenging the scholars who take on such projects and reproduce the same old nonsense on mental illness prevalence which reinforces the hegemonic view of black, female, young, LGBT, working class, and other marginalised populations as pathological. As always, sociological investigation needs to focus on the powerful rather than the powerless. This requires the revitalisation of a truly critical research agenda for the sociology of mental health in which the operations and practices of the psy-professions and their production of knowledge claims are prioritised. Research would then focus on the politics of diagnostic construction and professional power, on how psy-professionals turn subjective, personal understandings of human beings into categories of pathology, on the inner workings of the mental health system, on the conflicts and alliances made internally and externally to these professions, and on their constant need to justify mental health practice as medically and scientifically relevant.

Bruce M.Z. Cohen, Psychiatric Hegemony: A Marxist Theory of Mental Illness

[mitigatedchaos]

[ @lokifreign ]

is it helpful to imagine that the Dem party s earnest about its philosophy & goals? how does that assumption fit with their policies and choices since Carter?

I never ended up reviewing much stuff 1980s-1990s, and mostly touched on 1970s as part of branching of my investigation into the effectiveness of charter schools - namely that 1970 is around the time we started to work on the matter seriously, so we've been trying at it for about 50 years.

But...

What I know, and what all of the Rationalists know, is that evolution is a property of all information systems that conform to certain rules.

There is no fundamental requirement that every possible way you slice humanity, it all has to be equal. There's only a statistical chance that they'll be close enough that it doesn't really matter on average. Which would be nice, in some sense, but it's a hope. It's not a law.

This is why most Rationalists are also Transhumanists; they want to raise humanity's material standard of living, but also they're liberals, so they don't want to hurt people to do so. If some people have bad spines, then we'll just make cool robot spines for them at a factory. There's no point waxing hysterical about how having a bad spine is oppression by society (it isn't), or flipping out and killing everyone that has a bad spine for being "inferior" (rather defeats the point).

Understanding evolution as a property of information systems, which does not require that everyone has a good spine, is available to anyone with about +1.5 SD without stating it, if education includes most of the basic background assumptions, if you catch my drift.

And the individualist meritocratic system hedges for this. It just measures the performance of each individual person's spine. It doesn't make assumptions about the underlying distribution of spines. And if you find great vitamins that fix people's spines, then it just accepts this benefit and moves on. Throw in some welfare to search for or distribute spine vitamins and you're mostly set.

Okay, now to get to the point.

Because this information is available to them, the progressive left/post-lib ≥ +1.5 SDs either knowingly, willingly, and deliberately chose to defect and selfishly promote graft; decided to be cowards when their capabilities should have them as officers; or their opinions are so socially determined that they can't be said to have their own opinions, and should be subordinated.

The ≤ +0s buying into the ideology after years of saying to be nice to everyone is disturbing, but they don't have the same responsibility.

Using individualist meritocracy for this purpose, while soft-suppressing the Nazis through social pressure, plus money for development, is a powerful technique to manage the problem at the current level of technology. We manage to promote individual behavioral justice until the problem can be solved, set the system up to function correctly if the problem solves itself, while quietly attempting to solve the problem, without making information accessible that more cognitively vulnerable populations might attempt to weaponize to undermine the project - the dangerous stuff is only to be discussed in obscure scientific journals you need +1 SD to even read.

This combination is genius. For a liberal, it's tough to do much better than this at current levels of technology, including social technology.

And the progressive left/post-lib +1.5s broke that within 10 years, in order to gain... no improvements on any worthwhile metric.

This gets into why I'm so furious with them. Now they might even break the medical establishment, science, and even all of the power plants outside of East Asia, pushing back the possibility of building a factory for cool robot spines by decades or maybe even centuries.

[bornredheadedme-blog]

Dear Ralph

Since I've known you for most of your life, I also know a lot about what went on in your life. For some of your history, I've been able to fill in the blanks, based on my professional experience and watching your behavior over the years.

Your years in Germany were difficult to say the least. You effectively cut off your support system here so when you went over there, you had nothing to help shore you up. I know, you don't need anyone to shore you up because you are the smartest and greatest. That's why you are so successful in your life.

I often wonder if you even know the source of your anger. You repeat things over many times and it always seems to go back to money, and/or taking your advice/lack of respect. Your memory is selective so that you remember only that you were generous with both. And those people who wronged you are stupid and will only end up poor and destitute because they ignored your precious advice.

You come off as being generous, but at what cost? You insist that rather than depend on prescription medication for my asthma, I should buy cheaper Primatene tablets and depend on those. I've had asthma for years and over time, have come to terms with what I need to do to care for myself. But you insist that you know better than my pulmonologist. Your advice was neither sought nor respected because you couldn't respect my self-knowledge or years of experience.

You force your opinion on everyone, even when we thank you and move on, you continue to insist that you are the only one who is right. You have shown how truly narcissistic you have become. If we don't change our evil ways, you become angry and call us stupid. Your contempt of us is so obvious and even when pointed out, you disparage anyone else's opinion. We've experienced your name calling, insulting comments, and bullying so much that when you tell me you're done...well, I'm not seeing it. Just when I think I'm safe from this narcissist, you text me again to show me an article indicating that you believe you are the smartest among living beings. It doesn't seem to matter that others have a high IQ.

My education includes assessing people. I can even do it on the fly, but ethically would not do so in a meaningful way. I'm trained to estimate a person's IQ, and have years of experience utilizing that training based on strong scientific research. My diagnostic skills have been pretty spot on so far in my professional career, and have matched closely to various psychological assessments done by PhDs. So when you send me a magazine article pointing to the top 10 ways to know that someone has a high IQ, maybe better you should send me the top 10 ways to know someone displays narcissistic behavior. In this house, we all have a triple digit IQ and use it daily.

Every time you tell me it isn't about money, I know it's about money. You think you're being generous by deciding to purchase something because it's such a great deal. I know I have a hearing problem and struggle daily with understanding people's speech. So you generously locate a set of earbuds that attach to the outside of the ear and tell me you will get them and have them sent to me. I told you 3 times not to do that and you did it anyway. I'm waiting for you to send me a bill. They don't work for me and I told you they didn't when you insisted on ordering them. I believe that when you tell me that you were so generous with other members of my family, the circumstances were similar.

Ashley's car repair...did she specifically ask you to order the parts or did you jump the gun and do that thinking she will think you brilliant and heroic. The stupid blankets you purchased for all of us despite Melissa telling you they were not needed. I'm now stuck with a 10 foot square blanket for my little full size bed. I never opened it so you can take it back if you want. I could go on, and have the text messages to support my statements.

I know that you need to protect yourself from feelings of inferiority and shame, and so you will always deny your shortcomings, cruelties, and mistakes. I refuse to be upset and/or get blamed for something that’s not my fault or be characterized with negative traits I don’t possess. I know from experience that it isn't about me.

You don’t live in reality, and that includes your views of other people. My self-esteem is pretty strong. You get to keep that projected negativity all to yourself.

[frontlinemedicaltechnologies]

Revolutionizing Emergency Medical Care with Front Line Medical Technologies

Front Line Medical Technologies is at the cutting edge of medical innovation, focused on developing advanced solutions for emergency bleeding control and resuscitation. Our mission is simple yet profound: to save lives by empowering medical professionals with the best tools and resources. Here’s an in-depth look at who we are, our flagship product COBRA-OS, the resources we offer, why you should choose us, and our mission for the future.

About Us

Front Line Medical Technologies was founded with an unwavering commitment to patient safety and care. We are more than just a medical device company; we are a community driven by a shared vision to become global leaders in improving patient survival rates. Our team consists of seasoned medical professionals, innovative engineers, and experienced business veterans, all working together to transform emergency medical care.

What Sets Us Apart

Patient-Centric Approach: Everything we do is centered around patient well-being. Our groundbreaking technologies are designed to minimize complications and maximize patient survival chances.

Commitment to Quality: We adhere to the highest quality standards to ensure the reliability and effectiveness of our devices.

Innovative Solutions: Our team constantly pushes boundaries to develop faster, more efficient bleeding control solutions.

Collaborative Efforts: We build strong relationships with healthcare professionals to understand their needs and integrate our solutions seamlessly into their workflows.

COBRA-OS: A Game-Changer in Bleeding Control

At the heart of our product lineup is the COBRA-OS (Control of Bleeding, Resuscitation, Arterial Occlusion System), a revolutionary aortic occlusion device designed to control severe internal bleeding rapidly and efficiently.

Features of COBRA-OS

Smaller Profile: As the first-ever 4 Fr aortic occlusion device, COBRA-OS is significantly smaller than traditional devices, reducing complications associated with larger catheters.

Ease of Use: Designed for simplicity, COBRA-OS allows for quicker deployment, even by medical professionals with limited experience in REBOA (Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta) procedures.

Improved Outcomes: The COBRA-OS facilitates rapid temporary hemorrhage control, leading to better patient outcomes.

Why COBRA-OS is Revolutionary

Minimally Invasive: The device’s small size and ease of insertion minimize the risk of complications during emergency procedures.

Time-Saving: Quick deployment can be the difference between life and death in critical situations, making COBRA-OS a vital tool in emergency care.

Versatility: Suitable for use in various emergency scenarios, providing flexibility for healthcare professionals.

Resources at Your Fingertips

We understand the importance of education and training in promoting the effective use of our devices. That’s why Front Line Medical Technologies offers a comprehensive library of resources designed to support healthcare professionals.

Educational Materials

Product Brochures and Manuals: Detailed information about COBRA-OS, its features, and benefits to ensure thorough understanding and proper use.

Clinical Studies and White Papers: Scientific evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of COBRA-OS, helping professionals make informed decisions.

Video Tutorials: Step-by-step instructions on how to deploy and use COBRA-OS effectively, catering to visual learners and enhancing practical skills.

Webinars and Training Programs: Opportunities to learn more about COBRA-OS and REBOA procedures from leading experts in the field, fostering a community of knowledgeable practitioners.

Access to Experts

Our resources don’t just stop at materials; we also provide direct access to experts who can offer guidance, answer questions, and provide insights based on the latest medical research and practices.

Conclusion

Front Line Medical Technologies is dedicated to revolutionizing emergency bleeding control. Our mission is to save lives by providing medical professionals with the best possible tools and resources. With our flagship product COBRA-OS, extensive educational resources, and unwavering commitment to innovation and quality, we are setting new standards in the medical field.

[semaglutidejourney]

Tell us about your company (Get Trim Tampa) . What problem does your company seek to solve? Who are your customers and how does your company uniquely meet their needs? Max 300 words.

Get Trim Tampa is dedicated to addressing the widespread issue of effective and sustainable weight management. Our company offers a comprehensive suite of services designed to help individuals achieve their weight loss goals in a healthy and scientifically-backed manner.

The Problem

Many people struggle with weight loss due to the abundance of ineffective and often harmful fad diets and weight loss programs. Traditional methods can be overwhelming, lack personalization, and fail to provide long-term results.

Our Solution

Get Trim Tampa provides a solution by offering personalized, medically supervised weight loss programs. Our primary service includes the use of FDA-approved weight-loss medication Semaglutide, also known as GLP-1. This medication helps control hunger, delay stomach emptying, and reduce calorie intake, which are critical factors in successful weight management.

Our Customers

Our clients are individuals who are serious about achieving and maintaining a healthy weight. They include people who have tried and failed with other weight loss methods, those looking for medically supervised programs, and individuals seeking a structured and scientifically-based approach to weight loss.

Unique Approach

What sets Get Trim Tampa apart is our commitment to personalized care. We provide free consultations to understand each client’s unique needs and tailor our programs accordingly. In addition to weight loss medication, we offer various vitamin injections (such as B12, MIC + B12, and Lipo-C) to support overall health and enhance the weight loss process.

We also prioritize education and ongoing support, ensuring that clients not only lose weight but also adopt sustainable habits for long-term success. Flexible financing options and a dedication to customer satisfaction further distinguish us from other weight loss programs.

At Get Trim Tampa, we are passionate about empowering individuals to achieve their health goals through effective, personalized, and science-based weight management solutions.

[isocyprys]

ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus: A Comprehensive Guide for Medical Device Manufacturers / Uncategorized / By Factocert Mysore

ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus

ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus In the ever-evolving clinical tool employer commercial enterprise business enterprise business organization, ensuring the safety of affected characters and products remains paramount. For organizations operating in Cyprus, wearing out ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus suggests a dedication to one’s critical factors. This certification demonstrates a sturdy Quality Management System (QMS) that prioritizes regular layout, development, production, set up, and servicing of clinical devices.

What is ISO 13485?

ISO 13485 Certification proves that your clinical device follows proper QMS(Quality Management Systems) from layout and production to set up and servicing.

It fulfils ill QMS requirements in countries like Europe, Canada and Australia.

It also serves as the basis for QMS Compliance in countries like Japan, Korea and Brazil.

The scientific device industry is one of the most touchy with rules and OK requirements.

Suppose a person’s lifestyle is at stake. In that case, the protection and reliability of the tool become non-negotiable, and proper requirements must be in place to ensure the consistency of high-quality transport.

Hence, regulatory necessities ensure that proper practices are followed, from design to market placement, as well as the provision and protection of clinical devices.

Who needs ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus?

It is meant for medical gadget designers, manufacturers, and after-sales provider stakeholders. [If your company manufactures medical devices] Certification bodies can use it in auditing procedures. What are the blessings of ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus?

Many other ISO Certifications observe the identical trend of being non-obligatory and voluntary in most markets.

Even if you observe the requirements and directives without certification, it will still give you many advantages.

However, getting a certification from a 3rd birthday celebration lets you in regulatory approaches.

Taking up the certification will assist you in setting up a marketplace, getting the right of entry to exclusive international locations (wherein miles are a prerequisite), and enhancing your sales.

Will assist in increasing efficiency, cutting charges & setting up your dedication to satisfaction within the atmosphere.

Increased Consumer Trust and Brand Reputation.

It will assist you in decreasing the chance of expensive product recalls, which can harm you.

In the United States, The Regulatory body, FDA, allows clinical tool manufacturers to post ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus audit reviews in the vicinity of evidence of compliance with its high-quality structures guidelines(QSR)

The significant tiers of ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus implementation:

Understanding the standard requirements

Gap analysis of the contemporary device and the necessities

Stagewise is making plans for the QMS established order.

Providing the specified education for the QMS team

Documentation of the QMS, including the information

Internal Quality Audits and CAPA

Management assessment meetings

Medical device corporations should hire experienced ISO experts who know all threat gadgets. The regulatory requirements are continuously being reviewed & amended with emphasis on patient safety.

Hence, for your medical tool employer, it’s essential to lease consultants who integrate and identify unique product regulatory necessities along with MDR, IVDR, or FDA 510k to be on the side of different vital requirements.

Conclusion:  ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus

Obtaining ISO 13485 certification in Cyprus signifies a significant achievement for your medical device company. It’s a testament to your commitment to upholding rigorous quality standards throughout your entire product lifecycle.

Why Factocert for ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus

We provide the best ISO consultants Who are knowledgeable and provide the best solution. And to know how to get ISO certification. Kindly reach us at contact@factocert.com. work according to ISO standards and help organizations implement ISO Certification in Cyprus with proper documentation.

For more information, visit ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus.

RELATED LINKS ISO Certification in Cyprus ISO 9001 Certification in Cyprus ISO 14001 Certification in Cyprus ISO 22000 Certification in Cyprus ISO 27001 Certification in Cyprus ISO 45001 Certification in Cyprus ISO 13485 Certification in Cyprus CE MARK  in Cyprus

[medprime]

Can the digital microscope be connected to a computer or a monitor for viewing?

Digital microscopes have revolutionized the way we observe the microscopic world. Unlike traditional optical microscopes that rely on eyepieces, digital microscopes use cameras to capture images, making it possible to view and analyze samples on a computer screen or even a larger monitor. In this article, we will explore the capabilities of digital microscopes and guide you through the process of connecting them to a computer or a monitor for viewing.

Understanding Digital Microscopes

What is a digital microscope?

A digital microscope is a cutting-edge tool used to examine tiny objects, such as biological specimens, materials, or electronic components, with the help of high-resolution digital imaging. These microscopes are equipped with digital cameras that capture real-time images, allowing for easy and detailed analysis.

Types of digital microscopes

There are various types of digital microscopes, including USB digital microscopes, WiFi microscopes, and portable digital microscopes. Each type has its own advantages and can be used in different settings.

Advantages of digital microscopes

Digital microscopes offer several benefits, including the ability to capture still images and record videos, zoom in on details, and easily share findings with others through digital media. They have become indispensable tools in scientific research, quality control, and education.

Connecting a Digital Microscope to a Computer

To connect a digital microscope to your computer for viewing, you will need specific hardware and software. Here's a step-by-step guide:

Select the right digital microscope: Ensure that your microscope is compatible with your computer's operating system and has the necessary connectivity options, such as USB or WiFi.

Install the required software: Most digital microscopes come with their own software for image capture and control. Install the software on your computer.

Connect the microscope to your computer: Using a USB cable or a WiFi connection, link the microscope to your computer.

Launch the software: Open the microscope's software on your computer. You should now see the live feed from the microscope on your screen.

Start exploring: Adjust focus, magnification, and lighting settings to view and capture images or videos.

Connecting a Digital Microscope to a Monitor

While connecting a digital microscope to a computer is common, you can also connect it to a monitor for larger and more comfortable viewing. Here's how:

Choose the right digital microscope: Ensure that your microscope has the necessary video output or HDMI connectivity.

Select the monitor: Connect the digital microscope to a monitor using an HDMI cable or any appropriate video cable.

Power up: Turn on the digital microscope and the monitor.

Adjust settings: Modify focus, magnification, and lighting to optimize the image quality on the monitor.

Enjoy a bigger view: Now, you can comfortably view your samples on the monitor without straining your eyes.

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Solving connectivity problems

If you encounter issues while connecting your digital microscope, ensure that the cables are securely connected and that the software is properly installed. Consult the user manual or customer support if problems persist.

Maintaining optimal image quality

To get the best image quality, keep your digital microscope and monitor clean, and adjust lighting and focus as needed. Regular maintenance ensures consistent performance.

Applications of Digital Microscopes

Digital microscopes find applications in various fields, such as:

In education and research: They facilitate interactive learning and detailed research in biology, geology, and more.

In industrial and medical fields: Digital microscopes aid in quality control, defect inspection, and medical diagnostics.

Emerging trends: Advancements in digital microscopy include 3D imaging and remote sharing, expanding their applications.

Conclusion

The digital microscope's ability to connect to a computer or a monitor opens up a world of possibilities for users. Whether you're a scientist, a student, or an industry professional, these versatile tools allow you to explore and analyze the microscopic world with ease.

Unique FAQs

FAQ 1: Can any digital microscope be connected to a computer?

Most digital microscopes can be connected to a computer, but it's essential to check compatibility and the required software.

FAQ 2: Can I view 3D images with a digital microscope on a monitor?

Yes, some digital microscopes offer 3D imaging capabilities when connected to a compatible monitor.

FAQ 3: Are there wireless options for connecting digital microscopes to computers or monitors?

Yes, WiFi digital microscopes eliminate the need for physical cables and offer flexible viewing options.

FAQ 4: How do I clean and maintain my digital microscope for optimal performance?

Regularly clean the lenses and follow the manufacturer's maintenance guidelines to ensure the best image quality.

FAQ 5: What are some unique applications of digital microscopes in research and industry?

Digital microscopes are used for various applications, such as analyzing cell structures, inspecting microelectronics, and conducting environmental studies.

[prathamesh0090]

Breaking Down the Curriculum: What to Expect in a Nutrition and Dietetic Course

A diploma in nutrition and dietetics is a comprehensive program that provides students with the knowledge and skills necessary to pursue a career in the field of nutrition. The curriculum is designed to cover a wide range of topics related to food, nutrition, and health.

In this article, we will break down the curriculum of typical dietetic and nutrition courses in India, highlighting the different topics and subjects covered.

Nutrition Fundamentals:

The fundamentals of nutrition are essential for students pursuing a diploma in nutrition and dietetics. The curriculum includes topics such as macronutrients and micronutrients, digestion and metabolism, and the role of nutrition in health and disease. Students learn how to analyze diets and assess nutritional needs, and they gain a deep understanding of the science behind food and nutrition.

Food Science:

Food science is another important aspect of the curriculum in a nutrition and dietetic course. Students learn about food composition, food processing and preservation, and the effects of cooking on nutrient content. They also study food safety and quality assurance, learning about foodborne illnesses and ways to prevent them.

Clinical Nutrition:

Clinical nutrition is a vital component of a nutrition and dietetic course. Students learn about medical nutrition therapy, which involves using nutrition to treat and prevent disease. They study different disease states and conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, and learn about the role of nutrition in managing these conditions.

Community Nutrition:

Community nutrition is an essential component of a nutrition and dietetic course. Students learn about the nutritional needs of different populations, such as children, older adults, and pregnant women. They also learn about the social and environmental factors that impact food access and food choices, and they study different approaches to promoting healthy eating in communities.

Research Methods:

Research methods are an essential part of a nutrition and dietetic course. Students learn about different types of research designs, such as observational studies and randomized controlled trials. They also learn about statistical analysis and interpretation of research findings, which is critical for evaluating the scientific literature and designing nutrition interventions.

Potential Career Paths:

As a registered dietitian in hospitals, clinics, or private practice.

As a nutritionist in public health programs, research organizations, or food and supplement companies.

As a food service manager in hospitals, schools, and other facilities.

As a health coach or consultant for individuals or corporations.

As an educator in academic or community settings.

Course Duration and Format:

Nutrition and dietetic courses can range from 6 months to 2 years in duration, depending on the level of certification or diploma.

These courses are offered in various formats, including online, distance learning, part-time, and full-time options.

Online courses have become increasingly popular due to their flexibility, allowing students to study at their own pace and from any location.

Admission Requirements:

To be eligible for a nutrition and dietetic course, students must have completed their 12th standard or equivalent education.

Some courses may also require students to have a background in science or healthcare.

Admissions are typically based on merit and may involve an entrance exam or interview process.

Curriculum:

The curriculum of a nutrition and dietetic course typically includes courses in biochemistry, physiology, nutrition science, food science, and clinical nutrition.

Students may also have the opportunity to participate in internships or practicums to gain hands-on experience in the field.

Additionally, courses in communication, business management, and marketing may be offered to prepare students for careers in the industry.

Accreditation and Certification:

Accreditation is an essential aspect of nutrition and dietetic courses, as it ensures that the program meets certain standards of quality and rigor.

In India, the National Accreditation Board for Education and Training (NABET) and the Indian Dietetic Association (IDA) are some of the organizations that provide accreditation for nutrition and dietetic courses.

After completing a nutrition and dietetic course, students may also have the opportunity to become certified as registered dietitians or nutritionists, which may be required for some careers in the field.

Conclusion

A diploma in nutrition and dietetics is a comprehensive program that provides students with the knowledge and skills necessary to pursue a career in the field of nutrition. The curriculum is designed to cover a wide range of topics related to food, nutrition, and health. Students learn about nutrition fundamentals, food science, clinical nutrition, community nutrition, and research methods.

By completing a nutrition and dietetic course, students can pursue careers as nutritionists, dietitians, or health coaches, and they can make a significant impact on the health and well-being of individuals and communities.

[darklingichor]

Project Hail Mary by Andy Weir **MAJOR SPOILERS**

So, this is a first, I've never written a revisit this fast.

I do often read or listen to an especially good book, again, right after I finish it. Usually because I can't get into another book until I do.

I did it with Lamb, and I did it with the Martian.

This one is going to be chock full of spoilers, I really want to analyze the main characters in this book, and I can't do that without going into details. This is why I marked the hell out of this.

Project Hail Mary is even better the second time around. This is often the case. Books are like soup. The leftovers from the fridge are often even better than when you had it the first time.

*SPOILERS* *SERIOUSLY SPOILERS TURN BACK NOW IF YOU HAVEN’T READ THIS BOOK* *SPOILERS* *THE REST OF THIS RAMBLE WILL RUIN THE BOOK* *SPOILERS*

Okay, so run down.

The book opens with our main character waking up to an annoying computer asking him basic math questions. This is detecting cognitive function, that's my guess anyway.

Our character quickly discovers a few things. First, he's in a room with robot arms tending to him, including unhooking him from various life support systems as it figures out that he is awake and functioning. He's not alone in the room, there are two others, but they are long dead. And he has no idea, who he is, where he is, or why he's there.

What follows for a little while is what I would call a psychological screwball comedy. It takes him several days to work out that his name is Ryland Grace and he is a microbiologist PhD who had a falling out with the academic community and found his calling as a Jr. High science teacher. Though exploration, experiments, and memory flashes, he works out that he is on a spaceship, the corpses were his crewmates, and he is on a mission to Tau Ceti to save earth from an alien algae like creature, called Astropgage, that is dimming the sun and setting earth on the course to an ice age that will begin to wipe out humanity in 30 years. Tau Ceti, which is 12 light years away from earth, is resistant to this energy sucking algae.

We get all the backstory of how he became a crew member aboard the ship Hail Mary, in flashbacks as his memories return. A big memory that returns? Project Hail Mary is a suicide mission, he will not be going home.

In the meantime, he is slowly trying to figure out how to save earth, while he does this, he sees a very weird spaceship and meets an intelligent alien being. This being (Grace calls him Rocky) comes from a world (Earid) that is in the same situation as Earth. Together, Grace and Rocky have to work out how to save both of their home worlds.

Ryland Grace is a complex character, he’s very very different from Mark Watney (I haven't read Artimis so I can't make comparisons to those characters).

The Martian points out that Astronauts are inherently noble, willing to risk their lives for science and a good cause.

Grace is not an astronaut. That's not to say that he isn't a good person, just that he is an average person. He can be all at once self-sacrificing and selfish.

Early on he is drafted into the research team on what would be called Astropgage as a science expert by Eva Strat, a woman in charge of figuring out what is going on and how to stop it.

Once he was released from his part in this research, he goes back to teaching, only to be struck by the fact that his students would be in their early forties when all hell breaks loose, and that they might die. He then goes back to Strat and demands to be part of the research again.

This back and forth happens a few times in the story. In fact, it becomes a big part of it. See, the crew of the Hail Mary were put into comas to ensure that they would not go nuts and kill each other on the 12 light-year (four years from their perspective) journey, a medical company discovered that 1 in 7000 people have the genes to survive long comas and still function when they wake up. Grace is one of those people, but he is not volunteering for this mission. It's not that he doesn't care, or even that he doesn't want to help, it's that he's scared. And who wouldn't be? But honestly? I think Grace has imposture syndrome and is generally very sensitive. He realized that his kids would suffer, after starting to teach a class, that speed him to become a part of Strat's team again. Events happen that lead him to being the only logical candidate for the science expert aboard the Hail Mary. He refused, Strat basically kidnaps him, sets the computer induce amnesia in only Grace and plunks him on board.

Before she does this, she harshly calls Grace out.

“Do you think I don’t know you, Dr. Grace?!” she yelled. “You’re a coward and you always have been. You abandoned a promising scientific career because people didn’t like a paper you wrote. You retreated to the safety of children who worship you for being the cool teacher. You don’t have a romantic partner in your life because that would mean you might suffer heartbreak. You avoid risk like the plague.” (pg. 392 Kindle Edition)

This all seems to be true, but we don't know Grace's full story. Other than a mention of one girlfriend in college, and brief mentions of friends, There is nothing in the book about his life before he started teaching. This could be because the amnesia has left those things fuzzy, but in my head, it's because he doesn't want to think about it. Maybe he had a bad family life, maybe he had *no* family life, maybe he had an early tragedy. Maybe he realized his short comings and that, no matter his talent, he just didn't have the temperament for acidemia.

He does like being the cool teacher, he does say he likes being looked up to, but this isn't necessarily a bad thing. He's a *good* teacher.

I had cool teachers before I switched to home school. They weren't all good. I had one that would literally just let us mess around during class because they didn't want to actually grade papers. Cool to a kid? Absolutely! Good for education? Not on your life.

Grace isn't like that, he loves science, he loves teaching, and the kids are learning.

He doesn't like animal testing, he's emotional at the fragility of humanity. In short, in his quiet way he loves life.

He leaves his comfort zone to be a part of Strat's team because he knows he's good at what he does and he couldn't look at his students and knowing they could die when he could help prevent it. That doesn't mean he thinks he will be Earth's savior, just that he can help.

He's unwilling to die.

Usually in books and movies, this translates to coward, but really? It's not. Most people wouldn't volunteer for a suicide mission, especially one this pressure filled. "So, we need you to go into a coma, go to a different solar system, save your whole species, and then kill yourselves so you won't starve to death. We good? Cool."

You can't fault a living being for wanting to live. Plus, the other crew members had time to think it through, really decide, make peace with the decision and *then* carry through with the training. Grace? He was given the training, but Strat always said it was for the science of the mission. She was a little like Dumbledore, in that she was training him in case he had to go, but never told him it was a possibility. When it became clear that he was the choice for the vacant spot, he was given less than five hours to decide, and then was told he had no choice.

He makes noble choices throughout the book, but that one choice was not his own, because Strat was given absolute power and used it absolutely.

I can't say that Strat is a villain, either. She was elected to save earth and given the power to cut through any red tape. Handed all this authority, she doesn't become corrupt, she uses this power ruthlessly, but always with the only goal being Save Earth, full stop, that's it. And even as Grace, understandably terrified, yells at her she tells him that she likes him, that she knows that he is a good man, that he will give this  his all. She doesn't *want* to send this unwilling and scared man on a suicide mission. She *has* to. Strat is also complex, she is not nonsense and is committed to her role in saving humanity. I like the reason she gives as to why, toward the end of the book. She got her undergrad degree in history. She takes to heart the old saying that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

The climate scientists and their models assumed survival based on the idea that all countries will work together for the common goal. However, Strat points out that history shows that that ideal scenario, is not likely to work. She says that most wars, up until very recently, were fought over food, and resulting in famine.  As the sun loses energy and crops fail, there will be wars, and they will be over food. And that is what she is desperately trying to avoid – the horror of history brought to the modern day.

I started as a history major, and history is interwoven into anthropology – I understand this perspective.

I am not going to get into politics, but I’ve experienced the agonizing frustration of watching history repeat itself, more than once in the last couple of years. Guessing at how something will probably go due to how something lines up with a similar event in the past and knowing that if someone in power would just listen it might turn out different, or that the eventual problems could at least be prepared for, and watch it happen anyway and everyone act surprised. It’s enough to make you pull your hair out.

Strat has the knowledge and the authority to act on it, I can’t say, that in her position I wouldn’t act the same way.

That is the major difference between Grace and Strat: viewpoint. By necessity of her position and by virtue of her education, she sees the big picture clearly, Grace, however, doesn’t. He’s a microbiologist, his entire career and education is looking closely at the small things and how they would translate to big things. He studies the universe by studying the smallest things in it. It is no surprise that he would need the smaller things to make the bigger things to snap into focus. When he was forced to start research on astrophage, it wasn’t until he was faced with the small scale (his kids could suffer) to make him see his part in the grand scheme of things. Strat is right, he does avoid risk, because he’s avoiding pain, he doesn’t let things in because he feels too much. Yes, the realization about the kids, puts steel in his spine, but not before he narrowly avoids a break down. For Grace, seeing Strat’s point of view, without being able to work it though to his scale, is like yelling at someone standing too close to a mountain for not being able to see the peak. It just can’t be done from where they are.

It makes me wonder, had Strat been up front with Grace, would he have willingly gone? It takes him a while to come around to the idea of helping the project in the first place. If he were told sooner, given some time, had been able to go home, and think, I feel like he would have gone. Something would have set him on the course. Maybe it would have been one of his former students, telling him about their plans for trying out for high school track, or going to college,  maybe he would have gone to his usual cafe for breakfast and found out that one of the waitresses had just gotten engaged, maybe he would be told these things and see the fear and desperate need to keep life as normal as possible in the person's eyes, and then he would decide, if, on the off chance  no one else could go, he would. Until he remembers his refusal, nearly at the end of the book, he accepts quickly that he volunteered for the mission. Of course, that could have been simply because he couldn't imagine someone forcing someone into something like that, but even as his memories and sense of self come back to him, he doesn't have a sense of terror or blind panic at the fact that he's not going home. I would think that if his unwillingness were something hard wired into his personality, he would know soon after remembering who he is, that he would have never considered being a part of the voyage.

So, I think, had Strat told Grace early on that he had the coma resistant genes and that there was a small possibility that he may have to be the backup for the backup, and then allowed him to come to terms with it, he would have gone without the drama. Don’t get me wrong, there is the possibility that he would have run off and had to have been hunted down, but I think, just like when he went to his class and saw his students, something would have made his conscious kick in, and he would have come back.

That might have been interesting, him running scared for a little while and then coming back? Might have given a little more background into why he is the way he is. But that’s not really what this book is about, I think it’s a forgone about conclusion that Grace would have helped, but what’s really interesting is how Grace and Rocky work together.

Rocky is cool! I love that Weir didn’t go the easy route with the creation of an alien character. Rocky is no Roswell gray with a humanoid form. No no, for our sympathetic alien, we have a spider like creature with liquid mercury for blood who “sees” with echolocation and speaks in musical notes. And it works!!

Rocky is expressive and funny and is great with Grace. It’s hilarious, other than the Russian scientist on Project Hail Mary, he doesn’t get along with anyone as well as he does with Rocky, out of everyone in the book, Grace connects most with a spider shaped rock being, he has to make a computer program to speak with.

Rocky is a tad steadier than Grace, but that makes sense simply because of the two, Rocky knew what he was getting into, and Eridens not only have more time before their star dims to the point of causing a problem, but also, they live a long long time, so, Rocky knows he is going home. But the steadiness is also built into his personality. He and Grace are both analytical problem solvers, but seeing that Rocky is an engineer, his focus is to fix things. A problem arises, and his first reaction is “I will fix that.” He won’t be dissuaded until he has all avenues exhausted.

Grace has a habit, early on, of moping for a little while before rallying and getting to work. His interaction with Rocky brings that pouting time down a bit, and he even pulls Rocky out of a slump a time or two.

The relationship between these two is interesting because Grace says flat out that he is not a social person, he feels awkward in groups with people. But he easily communicates with his students, and he easily communicates with Rocky. Rocky is not childlike, but he does have something in common with the students, Grace, like any teacher, teaches his students, and learns from them. Grace teaches Rocky and learns from him. Grace is comfortable with this sort of interaction; with his students this is where the relationship stops. With Rocky, it doesn’t have that boundary. By virtue of the fact that both are alone in space and crave interaction, they talk a lot. Also, activities that Grace is use to doing alone, Rocky’s culture requires to be done in pairs. The biggest: Sleeping.

Eridens do not sleep without another person watching them. So, he insists that he watch Grace sleep and that Grace watches him. It is not expressly said what other things Eridens don’t do alone, but it is implied (at least to me) that they work better in pairs or in groups. This is true of humans as well, but Grace in particular is a loner, even as he complains that science doesn’t happen with one scientist doing the work (and he’s right) but he does work alone even when the astrophage project opened up to more people, the feeling I get is that he still does most of his work alone unless asked to teach others, or forced to come along by Strat.

Grace quickly becomes acclimated to Rocky’s way of doing things, in an odd way, Grace is more comfortable being Eriden, than he is being human. And I really think that this is the crux of their relationship.

I read somewhere recently that family isn’t necessarily blood, but who you would bleed for.

I feel that Rocky and Grace would sacrifice themselves for their respective home worlds, but they will bleed for each other. Grace must go to a different star system to find family, which is actually really cool to me, because the story manages to have Grace have a story of growth and even a quiet redemption arc all with the background noise of a potential double Armageddon, and we manage not to lose sight of any of these elements. Add to this that the book will make you laugh, cry and think all at once. I love the Martian, but I honestly think this one is better!

[life-rewritten]

WE BEST LOVE  (FIGHTING MR 2ND) ShouZhen and The Acceptance of Feelings, Love and Self

Warning this was really hard to write, I tried to be as sensitive as I could but if I have said anything ableist or wrong, and I need to be educated please let me know. I don’t mean to do that but when it comes to these two, I do have a degree in Clinical Psychology but there might be parts of me that are still ignorant, uneducated or insensitive to the community I don’t mean to be that way. So trigger warning(TW) for people, there are some ‘ableist’ comments or wording that I have to say when talking about a situation from someone’s perspective, let me know if there’s anything problematic about this analysis and I will try and edit and change anything that is wrong information, or offensive.

Oh god. This was a journey for me. This show like stuns me, I mean I’ve always known I would be obsessed with Xuan and Shouyi from We Best Love because they remind me of like a lot of couples I watched last year (Korean Psycho but it’s okay which kind of deals with the same themes in a different way, Flower of evil a bit more intense but still the same themes about society and ableism etc), so I’ve been waiting to write about them and discuss them in detail. Episode 3 just made me finally crack and start analysing them. I think the thing with We Best Love is that I am very surprised  by how this season has just been so good, and deep, and mature but at the same time it’s very risky what they’re trying to do. It can lead to backlash and offense caused if its not done properly. So take that with a grain of salt, as much as I am enjoying these choices I do know it could change in the last two episodes, I’m holding out hope though that this show will stay the way I think it’s going to go, I don’t think the writers mean to be problematic or insensitive I actually they’re trying to do the opposite but we shall see. Let’s get into analysing these two. I promise you this is worth reading despite the length. Let me know what you think 😊

So small summary we have Shouyi from season 1, he’s our cold hearted doctor, he is insensitive to people, he says things and does things without care about how it affects others, he rolls his eyes at Shide’s suffering with love because he thinks it’s stupid. He’s funny but there’s something missing for him, he can’t help but be drawn to someone who he thinks is a problem and wants to avoid but actually he also wants to keep and protect forever. And we have Xuan that person he’s someone who is autistic, he is smart, indifferent to people, he is in his own world and he is very set on Shouyi. Xuan has been chasing after Shouyi since high school when he first met him, and he’s determined to not give up on his love and determined to make Shouyi see that he also feels the same way. At first it seems like a typical unrequited obsessive storyline we see in BLs but there’s so much more to it than that and that’s why I adore this couple. Let’s break it down

As much as Shouyi is misunderstanding his heart, he’s also misunderstanding Xuan’s heart. He thinks Xuan’s feelings/belief of feelings is stemmed from his diagnosis of Xuan’s situation, so he thinks Xuan is ‘childish’ due his autistic tendencies, his other disorders, but before we go into more detail  on this base about why he refuses to accept Xuan’s feelings as real or long lasting, let’s talk about all the other reasons that others including Shouyi himself has given for why even though Shouyi and Xuan are two people who are in love with each other, (it’s a requited but they don’t know trope oddly even though it’s formed like a unrequited pining one sided love from Xuan to Shouyi), Shouyi refuses to acknowledge Xuan’s feelings and his.

 Logic vs Feelings

Teacher/Student: Morals, Laws and Age

Let’s first look at the first reason: the teacher/student issue that Shouyi used as an excuse in his head for why they couldn’t be together 15 years ago. A lot of people when trying to understand or form reasons why they thought Shouyi ran away from Xuan 15 years ago say that it’s because they were a taboo situation because he was essentially an older adult with a minor? A teacher student situation right?  So he felt logically and morally that they shouldn’t be together so they avoided crossing that boundary. This may be why he gave Xuan that ultimatum of finding him when he’s older and if they find each other again then Xuan can have a chance to chase after him though it’s a lie. And logically that makes sense, the teacher and student trope in romance love stories and BL can somewhat seem predatory and bring up those issues of consent, age and other topics. So normally it’s an uncomfortable thing to deal with, it does seem like Xuan was very young if we’re thinking he’s 30? Then he may have been 15-18 when they first met so there was definitely an age gap between them and Xuan was definitely a minor who probably shouldn’t be in a relationship with a teacher. It’s very good of Shouyi to turn away from Xuan at that time even if he did have his own feelings for him. Shouyi was a teacher figure, a protective guardian that Xuan kept seeking help and guidance from. My guess is that Shouyi saw how Xuan had transformed from the first time he met him to someone more healthier and better and felt uncomfortable when Xuan confessed how he felt and made it known that he wanted Shouyi to see him in a romantic way. So yes, the logical/moral reason for why Shouyi pushed Xuan away makes sense but I feel like there’s more to it than just that.

In the Taiwanese wiki because I’m not sure if this information will show up in the show anymore but Shouyi’s character was written as someone who was resentful to his parents because they forced him to do medicine. He ended up studying medicine but to spite them instead of becoming a doctor he actually chose to be a teacher/high school doctor which provided less money and skewed their expectations. Later he’d become a university doctor before finally quitting all that and choosing to run a bistro/café. Shouyi did not really mean to become a protective figure in his highschool doctor role, we see him as well in university he doesn’t do the role of a teacher/helper, he’s just logically following  the rules/operations that the medical occupation does. He’s also very rough with how he takes care of his patients and he doesn’t bother to make them feel safe/or cared for or whatever, he’s abrupt, rude and cold. But as we start to uncover when we finally go into the past so I will be also using their trailer/music video to analyse with this essay, , once Xuan came to Shouyi for protection and nurture, (latched onto him like a baby bird) Shouyi did offer guidance and care and knowledge to Xuan helping him want to do more, want to learn more, want to be more and grow so he did essentially without meaning to ended up in a teacher role for Xuan which is why he sees Xuan as a child in need of advice, guidance and immature/naïve. This is why even after they reunite Shouyi still thinks Xuan has the same characteristics and childish actions as he did when he was 15.

The Doctor/Patient Situation: Healing, Obligation, Protection

 The medical aspect of their relationship is important as well because both are connected to psychological disorders and Shouyi is again a guiding role and Xuan is a patient. Shouyi thinks because he’s studied medicine about the scientific explanations as a doctor about the disorders that Xuan has, what it entails, what it could lead to, how characteristics may be described and he rationalises and kind of judges/ stereotypes in my opinion ideas about why Xuan feels the way he does, or acts the way he does. So instead of seeing Xuan as more than a patient, his mind automatically sees him as someone with his condition rather just a person with feelings.  I’m not going to lie I think there’s a bit of ableism from how Shouyi treats Xuan because he doesn’t see him as someone able to function without his disorder, he kind of rationalises and only sees him as one static stereotype and is constantly diagnosing him. But I do think that’s something the show may want to call out, when they show how Xuan is treated by people or seen  by people because it does look like people automatically see Xuan as his disorder instead of just Xuan as himself. They blame a lot of things it seems on their mindset of what they think his disorder causes which is ableist. I think this is something Xuan has had to probably deal with since he was younger, and that’s why he’s so protective and adamant in letting people know he’s not sick he’s okay, he’s normal, he’s okay being himself, he’s not a threat, he’s not an issue etc. So I think we may have a commentary more on this in the subtext. But Shouyi is ironic when he plays a role in this because I think he is also someone who people are ableist to, I think he’s also like that to himself, because he also has a psychological disorder that makes people see him as that. Shide does mention how he should have known Shouyi won’t do anything for someone’s good, but for his own selfishness since he has his disorder in season 1, and I think just like Xuan this is something he had to learn a lot and accept about himself hence his issue with romance. So Xuan is an antithesis to Shouyi he’s more aggressive and protective and doesn’t like how society views him but Shouyi seems to have embraced and accepted his disorder and has a mindset that he’s exactly that and has also accepted  how people expect him to act.

Anyway because of how he views Xuan (like how others do) he decides that the reason for why Xuan is into him can be explained psychologically; he’s a child in need of a figure to latch onto he’s somehow attached himself to Shouyi (filail imprinting) because he was overexposed to him. There is so many psychological theories on attachment and imprinting, but this reminds of the baby duck syndrome. This is an effect when someone gets exposed to something/they learn about it, they immediately latch onto this as the best thing compared to anything else and thus can’t change or move away from it. Anyway what I’m trying to get at is that Shouyi thinks Xuan’s attachment to him can be explained by psychology because Xuan is like a child who has latched him onto him as his only comfort/hope/joy whatever, because of that Xuan is deluding himself into thinking that’s love. With this syndrome the duckling is willing to be obsessed, sacrificial, just determined to be near that thing that matters to them so Xuan’s focus and determination to be with Shouyi can be explained in his head like that. So he sees Xuan’s feelings for him is seen not as love but as an imprint seeing him as a guardian figure, teacher figure, father figure etc. Someone who can take care of him.

With Xuan’s actions you could see how Shouyi who has no idea about feelings would think so. When they first meet, Xuan was very protective and defensive hence quite violent in order to protect himself, he was even very scared and distrustful of Shouyi at first, (my theories is that he was probably defensive because he was constantly bullied and treated badly because of how some people saw his disorder). But somehow Shouyi manages to calm him down and show him care by taking care of his wounds etc, and it causes Xuan to notice that he feels safe and he cares about being with this person.

So with all that said, obviously again in Shouyi’s head there’s a logical/scientifical reason for why he doesn’t want to acknowledge or believe Xuan’s feelings as long lasting or real. Again it makes sense, a doctor/patient relationship again borders on a lot of moral questions and lines that need to be discussed with/dealt with before they can be together. Xuan was seen by Shouyi as someone unstable, violent, self harming, depressed, etc He was seen as a patient in need of help so as someone playing the role of his care taker/ doctor that’s the only thing that he should be to him. But again I think yes logically he thinks this way but I also think knowing Shouyi these are all excuses for why he actually cares for Xuan. There is definitely a difference with how he pays attention to Xuan despite acting like he doesn’t care, there is definitely more feelings of protectiveness and worry for Xuan, and although he complains about not wanting Xuan near him, there is a lot of feeling lack, emptiness and discomfort without him there which I think he’s going to learn more about this season when he finally truly pushes Xuan away. In season 1, all Shouyi did was pine and think about Xuan, he held onto Xuan’s items and refused to let them go, he held onto them like a memory and its odd, he also gets very angry when Shide takes some of those memories and gets rid of them (the noodles) and it causes him to be spiteful but Shide thinks he’s being spiteful because of course he’s spiteful, he’s Shouyi with an emotional disorder he doesn’t care. Shide didn’t understand what those memories meant for Shouyi which is important. Because Shouyi doesn’t clock that, that’s a sign that he does miss and does want Xuan by his side.

So in my mind he is in love/or did have those feelings even after episode 3 when they kiss. But he reverts to using logic to explain why it’s happening, he uses logic to remove the importance and sentiments of emotions and feelings concerning how Xuan treats him and how he treats Xuan. Why they are connected. So as a teacher the moral obligation to guide and teach and help Xuan is why he cares. As a doctor the psychological consequences of not preventing Xuan from hurting himself or going too far is the reason for why he must nurture, and protect him/carry him. And the thing is they both really again compliment each other though like I said even if they had feelings, they shouldn’t have crossed that boundary 15 years ago, but I want to explain why they’re a good couple and why they fit.

Love and Influence, Growth and Companionship

First of all they both have an influence on each other to be better/ to grow/ to learn. So from Xuan it’s clear there was a transformation from his 15 year old self without Shouyi to who he is now. I’m pretty sure his job interests, his ability to trust, and have hope for the future is connected to him discovering all that when he was spending time with Shouyi. Shouyi clearly made him see things differently, helped him with some lifestyle enquiries like he wanted him to be proud of him, he wanted to protect both of them so he took up boxing (we see him always constantly boxing in the office, he just learnt how to be more healthier (not because being autistic is being unhealthy but his actions were unhealthy when he was younger because he was self-harming etc). We also get to see how different he gets when he’s with Shouyi, he’s more confident, calmer, happier, just very lively and excited and it’s so adorable but also makes sense. Xuan is no longer hateful of people around him (not because of his disorder but because of how people around him probably treated him), or violent (he’s only violent for protection and defense) and actually we see in episode 3 him feeling very upset and guilty when he fights and Shouyi sees him because it seems like Shouyi made him promise to stop using violence as his first reaction to things, so he felt upset because he didn’t want to disappoint him. But we see in the future he’s not only better, but he works along Shide and he is a actually in a big role in the company he works for.

For Shouyi, Xuan makes him learn about his emotions that he thought he couldn’t have, Xuan leads him on a self discovery journey, to understand more about who he is and not what society thinks he is, or not what some diagnosis claims he is, and for him to know that he can have love and he can be happy. Xuan also represents to him ease, comfort and hope not yet but soon despite the fact that on the surface he tries to push him away, I’m sure this season we see him also relax, trust and just be more open to feelings the way he hasn’t been able to want to be because of others. They both have this message of making the other know that there’s nothing wrong with who they are, they’re normal and live a happy life despite what people have said or treated them as.

Deyi vs Shouzhen; Mirrors of Each Other

In a way Xuan is a mirror image to another character we know who he thinks has Shouyi’s heart Shide. Because the reason why Shide fell for Shuyi young, was because Shuyi was someone who he felt safe with, listened to, cared for, (same reasons why Xuan fell for Shouyi), Shide felt Shuyi led him to growth and purpose and determination to be strong and hope (again same as Xuan and Shouyi) and so because of his feelings he was determined to be near Shuyi and now in season 2, show Shuyi his devotion and love (again same  as Xuan to Shouyi). The love that they have for their person is automatic, uncontrollable, unconditional but also passionate and it makes them determined to be something to that person, to be with that person and to be in a position where they can protect that person. They both don’t mind if it’s one sided or if the love is more on their side than the other because the happiness they feel is by being with them and seeing them happy.

On the other hand Xuan and Shuyi struggle to actually realise their feelings that are also there just not prominent because they have a mindset stuck on logic, judgement but also on perceived societal opinions/rules. Let me explain so for Shuyi it’s because of his determination to not fall for men (because he had  internalised homophobia (IH)  something that is a theme that runs with him and Shide, it’s because of IH he automatically thinks Shide would choose a girl over him and get married and have a kid, it’s because of IH dealing with his father and the shareholders situation and the position of being his father’s heir that made him also say that he didn’t want to fall for a guy when he first realised how he felt for Shide), because of this he never saw Shide’s actions as romantic even when Shide was telling him/confessing to him in episode 2 in season 1, he always misunderstood Shide’s actions and intentions. This is the same as Shouyi who isn’t because of IH but because of ‘ableism’/raised with an ableist societal mindset  that makes him misunderstand Xuan’s actions  and also his own feelings and also it’s because of his own position (teacher/doctor role) that makes him also avoidant of dealing his feelings for Xuan in season 2.

Which is why I adore season 2, again in my previous analysis of this season, the aim of this season is to focus on maturity, real life issues, discussions and commentary on certain things because the characters in season 1 were more naïve, immature and starting out into the world, so its more prone to happiness, and love and all that (this is why season 1 was so light, and less angsty) when our characters grow older, the issues/topics that were hidden in season 1, (Shuyi and Shide’s miscommunication and misunderstanding about their actual feelings and their views on sexuality, Shouyi’s disorder and his mindset, etc) now have to be dealt with, discussed about but also fought with. Now every one has to fight for their path and deal with more serious conversations surrounding these things. That’s why it’s not a surprise season 2 is more angsty, more dramatic, more serious, it’s meant to be a mirror image of season 1, but just more elevated and deeper and more severe than what they had or what they knew when they were younger. That’s how life gets the more you’re older. That’s why I adore this show because yes season 2 is very different and more risky (they really took a risk with how they did season 2 as you can see a lot of people felt blindsided because they didn’t see the subtext and hints in season 1 when it was always there) but I like that it’s risky, I like that it’s tackling these issues, I like it’s more mature and serious but it still is We Best Love, it’s still a story about the innocent love going to passionate love before becoming the real pure definition of covenant love (unconditional, soulmate, growth, self love, self acceptance, communication and understanding). This is seriously why I love this show, I’m sad for the people who don’t see it as this because it’s always been the aim of the script writer to make it this way.

 Nature vs Nurture

Back to Shouyi and Xuan. Actually back to the funny thing about Shide and Shouyi. So Shouyi and Shide are cousins it’s been told to us but every time there’s a plot with their love interests there’s a misunderstanding that leads to a growth/elevation in their relationships because their partners misunderstand what they are to each other. In season 1, Shuyi’s jealousy about them makes him confess out loud he knows Shide’s feelings this leads to them finally dealing with the truth and coming out to each other. Shide does think Shouyi acted this way because he was angry but its actually because Shouyi is protective and caring to Shide in his own way even if he thinks he can’t care about people. The reason why he did what he did is because he wanted Shide to stop suffering in an unrequited love with Shuyi, he wanted to help but he used another excuse to explain away his emotions/feelings which is exactly his character and what we see he’s doing with Xuan. So with Shouyi he does care about people, he does have emotions but because of his diagnosis/ people told him, he doesn’t believe he does because I’m sure he struggles understanding what he feels.  But Yes so again with Xuan and Shouyi there’s a misunderstanding by Xuan that Shouyi loves Shide, which is going to play a part in their relationship, Shouyi uses this lie to push Xuan away and he thinks it’s a solution of making Xuan stop loving him. Because he thinks love is painful from watching Shide, he thinks the results of love isn’t worth it because he sees Shide suffer constantly because of his own feelings but I think he also envies them whenever they’re happy like we saw in the finale of season 1, he goes to drink looking contemplative and sad. He’s lonely. So again on the surface Shouyi thinks love is over rated and stupid but actually inside he feels empty and wants it but he thinks he’s unable to have that.

Let’s discuss Shouyi’s ‘disorder’ because it’s still very hard to process what he actually has. We know he thinks he’s emotionally defective like he isn’t able to feel emotions, or care about people. He can’t form emotional connections to people, he just sees them as nothing important. The only way I could rationalise or understand is to kind of group it with another disorder even I don’t know if it is that because I don’t think he’s a sociopath, but I see some of his symptoms close to ASPD? Or I guess I also think it’s just Alexithymia which is lack of emotional awareness where he doesn’t know what emotion he’s feeling but he does have it. Either way what I see with his symptoms is that he’s not unable to feel emotions I think he just doesn’t know or understand emotions/ feelings, so it’s like an obstacle or like it’s a challenge for him to fully come to terms with the idea of emotions and all that so he withdraws from that and sees himself as unable to feel or care.

This is my guess because it’s quite hard to understand his diagnosis when there’s not enough yet explained about what he does struggle with. Either way its either he doesn’t understand what emotions he’s feeling or he has lack of them. I think it’s the latter because I can see that he shows care to people and he’s protective and helpful to people he feels close to. (this is just what I’m seeing). Either way the similarities with Shouyi and Xuan is that they have both been born with something that has made them be seen in  a negative way or misunderstood way (as much as not everyone is ableist I still think that’s kind of the environment I’m seeing from the show about these two and how they’re treated. I could be wrong) and told different things about who they are and what they have. So for example I keep repeating that one scene but when Shide speaks to Shouyi angrily in season 1 in a very insensitive manner about his disorder, Shouyi is defensive and angry about the way he spoke to him, what he said about him, so you see there is annoyance when people say stuff like that about him even though it seems he also has embraced those ideas  about himself.

In his mind he knows what he has because it’s something he struggles with but I think it frustrates him that he doesn’t can’t explain why he’s the way he is, he probably tried to form attachments and feelings for people but couldn’t so he gave up on the idea of ever being able to do that. But I think it’s just because those people aren’t Xuan. I’m not fully sure about what kind of environment Xuan grew up in but if he was little and people made fun of him, or bullied him, or mocked him he would have struggled with knowing there’s nothing wrong with who he is vs a accepting what people said about him that he can’t ‘function’ because he’s ‘sick’ probably. Because he’s really defensive he does not like people telling him that there’s something wrong with him, that what he’s feeling is not normal or real, and he’s able to take care of himself and have a good life with who he is.  I think you see this struggle in him when he thinks Shouyi has feelings for Shide. Like he immediately once he gets caught fighting walks away sadly because you can guess what he’s thinking, it’s probably ‘Ofcourse it’s Shide he likes, someone ‘normal’ ‘stable’ etc” You can see him in my opinion regress with those thoughts which is why he turned away in shame and says to Shouyi if I was him you would care etc I think yes he fights what people say about him and he knows he’s okay and what he’s feeling but if people keep on making him feel like the opposite he will later regress and accept what they say about him. If he really does get pushed away finally by Shouyi I think he’ll finally really accept that mindset he’s been struggling to fight and reject that he’s ‘abnormal’ to society therefore he’s not allowed to have love because he’s an obstacle to himself and his partner. That’s something I think the story will show for them which is heart breaking. Sigh.

Taking A Risk

Before I continue, let’s pause because let’s discuss the trailer for episode 4. Because yes the trailer does make it look like Xuan hacked the computer out of jealousy and pettiness because of the Shide situation. I think this is a misdirect or a warning. I don’t think the writers will make him be the one who did that, by making him be misunderstood though as someone doing that, brings up commentary it brings up a discussion about how people treat him. So in my opinion there’s a difference if they make him the one who did that because of vindictiveness and resentment then that’s problematic but if they’re trying to show how people have been treating him all his life, I think that’s okay because that’s exactly the aim of the show, to show what he’s struggling with because of how he’s seen in this environment. I can see the characters thinking he’s the one, blaming him, being ableist and I think a lot of people are going to be sensitive and annoyed and I get it; it’s a very risky move by the script writer if she wants to go this way, for me I will understand because I get what the show is trying to say, it depends on the consequences if our characters do end up doing something ableist how do they get taught that they’re wrong and that’s the only thing about this risk that worries me she may not be able to fully make people accept the characters apologies/ flaws with this issue.

It’s so risky and this season has tried so hard with its risks to bring up stuff but I am really happy because we have an autistic BL character, I love it so much because I think it’s incredible. The fact that this season is tackling this conversation about psychological disorders; the fact that we have one character more defensive and determined to be taken more seriously because he’s learnt to love who he is and accept himself vs his partner who has never had that chance to think about what he wants, who he is, what he needs because he’s constantly thinking he’s prevented by his disorder  is something that’s very fascinating to me, and I’ve been so excited to analyse and see it play out on the screen by these brilliant actors. I have been begging for risks in BLs to be made, for more stories to be told that border on the line of sensitive topics and representation, these stories should obviously told by people who are representative of the characters but I also like that a writer took a risk to discuss it more and show it on the screen. I like that we have conversations about mental health on the screen and it’s important to see how another culture/country treats the subject of psychological disorders so we know what needs to be changed/ learnt/ discussed. However I do get that the autistic community and others could be triggered by things with this storyline so far I’ve spoken to people about how they feel about Xuan so far, and a lot of people from the community isn’t offended by him but that’s not a full population of people, but people did say they understood Xuan’s character. But I can’t speak for the community. But for me I just would love to have a whole BL season just for these two, because I really commend the writers if done properly on the risk they took to show this.

As you can tell from this essay I adore We Best Love, I know it’s a polarising decision because people seem to think this season is worse or whatever, but for me I love this show, I didn’t expect this show to be so deep and bring up these subjects it’s the reason why even when I could have written about season 1 since I noticed the themes that are more dealt with in season 2, I didn’t cause I thought it was just be me overthinking it. We Best Love didn’t promise to be the outstanding different BL, it really is simple in season 1, which is why I am surprised at the comments of people who say that they are shocked it’s just a basic BL, like what were they expecting the storyline is very easy to understand, and it does have tropes similar to other BLS, it’s just written better and has interesting characters and good acting. But season 2 is when they really go deeper and start to tackle really serious conversations and I understand that it borders on the line of toxicity, problematic content, questionable ideas but for me I’m so happy the characters are being shown as flawed and problematic. Like Shide and Shuyi weren’t healthy they won’t be until the end of the show that’s what the writer wants to achieve; they are going to end up growing and maturing together to finally get their happy ending, and that’s the same for Xuan and Shouyi right now because of mindsets, and misunderstandings etc they are going to be questionable but they’re going to learn to understand each other and show each other how they feel and grow together from their flaws. The characters are just humans, they make mistakes, they do things but they’re consistent with their character outlines and goals, the writer has never changed anything about the characters, she’s making them learn and mature and go through consequences for their flaws, and I think it’s really important to notice that. I think that’s enough reason for me to love this show because I really enjoy how she’s made a simple BL be very deep and realistic in my opinion about how people are when they fall in love. I also adore the whole team, the actors, producers, writer I think they have done such an amazing job and put so much effort, energy and hard work to tell this story when others don’t do that all the time. Anyway let me know what you think about these two, about the show, about season 2. I’m really surprised by the BLs we are getting lately I’m not goanna lie I am obsessed with every one of them and like just stunned by each conversation and analysis they bring. Absolutely phenomenal start to the year.

[sciencespies]

The Sex Education Pamphlet That Sparked a Landmark Censorship Case

https://sciencespies.com/history/the-sex-education-pamphlet-that-sparked-a-landmark-censorship-case/

The Sex Education Pamphlet That Sparked a Landmark Censorship Case

Mary Ware Dennett wrote The Sex Side of Life in 1915 as a teaching tool for her teenage sons. Photo illustration by Meilan Solly / Photos courtesy of Sharon Spaulding and Newspapers.com

It only took 42 minutes for an all-male jury to convict Mary Ware Dennett. Her crime? Sending a sex education pamphlet through the mail.

Charged with violating the Comstock Act of 1873—one of a series of so-called chastity laws—Dennett, a reproductive rights activist, had written and illustrated the booklet in question for her own teenage sons, as well as for parents around the country looking for a new way to teach their children about sex.

Lawyer Morris Ernst filed an appeal, setting in motion a federal court case that signaled the beginning of the end of the country’s obscenity laws. The pair’s victory marked the zenith of Dennett’s life work, building on her previous efforts to publicize and increase access to contraception and sex education. (Prior to the trial, she was best known as the more conservative rival of Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood.) Today, however, United States v. Dennett and its defendant are relatively unknown.

“One of the reasons the Dennett case hasn’t gotten the attention that it deserves is simply because it was an incremental victory, but one that took the crucial first step,” says Laura Weinrib, a constitutional historian and law scholar at Harvard University. “First steps are often overlooked. We tend to look at the culmination and miss the progression that got us there.”

Dennett wrote the offending pamphlet (in blue) for her two sons.  

Sharon Spaulding / Dennett Family Archive

Dennett wrote the pamphlet in question, The Sex Side of Life: An Explanation for Young People, in 1915. Illustrated with anatomically correct drawings, it provided factual information, offered a discussion of human physiology and celebrated sex as a natural human act.

“[G]ive them the facts,” noted Dennett in the text, “… but also give them some conception of sex life as a vivifying joy, as a vital art, as a thing to be studied and developed with reverence for its big meaning, with understanding of its far-reaching reactions, psychologically and spiritually.”

After Dennett’s 14-year-old son approved the booklet, she circulated it among friends who, in turn, shared it with others. Eventually, The Sex Side of Life landed on the desk of editor Victor Robinson, who published it in his Medical Review of Reviewsin 1918. Calling the pamphlet “a splendid contribution,” Robinson added, “We know nothing that equals Mrs. Dennett’s brochure.” Dennett, for her part, received so many requests for copies that she had the booklet reprinted and began selling it for a quarter to anyone who wrote to her asking for one.

These transactions flew in the face of the Comstock Laws, federal and local anti-obscenity legislation that equated birth control with pornography and rendered all devices and information for the prevention of conception illegal. Doctors couldn’t discuss contraception with their patients, nor could parents discuss it with their children.

Dennett as a young woman

Sharon Spaulding / Dennett Family Archive

The Sex Side of Life offered no actionable advice regarding birth control. As Dennett acknowledged in the brochure, “At present, unfortunately, it is against the law to give people information as to how to manage their sex relations so that no baby will be created.” But the Comstock Act also stated that any printed material deemed “obscene, lewd or lascivious”—labels that could be applied to the illustrated pamphlet—was “non-mailable.” First-time offenders faced up to five years in prison or a maximum fine of $5,000.

In the same year that Dennett first wrote the brochure, she co-founded the National Birth Control League (NBCL), the first organization of its kind. The group’s goal was to change obscenity laws at a state level and unshackle the subject of sex from Victorian morality and misinformation.

By 1919, Dennett had adopted a new approach to the fight for women’s rights. A former secretary for state and national suffrage associations, she borrowed a page from the suffrage movement, tackling the issue on the federal level rather than state-by-state. She resigned from the NBCL and founded the Voluntary Parenthood League, whose mission was to pass legislation in Congress that would remove the words “preventing conception” from federal statutes, thereby uncoupling birth control from pornography.

Dennett soon found that the topic of sex education and contraception was too controversial for elected officials. Her lobbying efforts proved unsuccessful, so in 1921, she again changed tactics. Though the Comstock Laws prohibited the dissemination of obscene materials through the mail, they granted the postmaster general the power to determine what constituted obscenity. Dennett reasoned that if the Post Office lifted its ban on birth control materials, activists would win a partial victory and be able to offer widespread access to information.

Postmaster General William Hays, who had publicly stated that the Post Office should not function as a censorship organization, emerged as a potential ally. But Hays resigned his post in January 1922 without taking action. (Ironically, Hays later established what became known as the Hays Code, a set of self-imposed restrictions on profanity, sex and morality in the motion picture industry.) Dennett had hoped that the incoming postmaster general, Hubert Work, would fulfill his predecessor’s commitments. Instead, one of Work’s first official actions was to order copies of the Comstock Laws prominently displayed in every post office across America. He then declared The Sex Side of Life “unmailable” and “indecent.”

Mary Ware Dennett, pictured in the 1940s

Dennett Family Archive

Undaunted, Dennett redoubled her lobbying efforts in Congress and began pushing to have the postal ban on her booklet removed. She wrote to Work, pressing him to identify which section was obscene, but no response ever arrived. Dennett also asked Arthur Hays, chief counsel of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), to challenge the ban in court. In letters preserved at Radcliffe College’s Schlesinger Library, Dennett argued that her booklet provided scientific and factual information. Though sympathetic, Hays declined, believing that the ACLU couldn’t win the case.

By 1925, Dennett—discouraged, broke and in poor health—had conceded defeat regarding her legislative efforts and semi-retired. But she couldn’t let the issue go entirely. She continued to mail The Sex Side of Life to those who requested copies and, in 1926, published a book titled Birth Control Laws: Shall We Keep Them, Change Them, or Abolish Them?

Publicly, Dennett’s mission was to make information about birth control legal; privately, however, her motivation was to protect other women from the physical and emotional suffering she had endured.

The activist wed in 1900 and gave birth to three children, two of whom survived, within five years. Although the specifics of her medical condition are unknown, she likely suffered from lacerations of the uterus or fistulas, which are sometimes caused by childbirth and can be life-threatening if one becomes pregnant again.

Without access to contraceptives, Dennett faced a terrible choice: refrain from sexual intercourse or risk death if she conceived. Within two years, her husband had left her for another woman.

Dennett obtained custody of her children, but her abandonment and lack of access to birth control continued to haunt her. Eventually, these experiences led her to conclude that winning the vote was only one step on the path to equality. Women, she believed, deserved more.

In 1928, Dennett again reached out to the ACLU, this time to lawyer Ernst, who agreed to challenge the postal ban on the Sex Side of Life in court. Dennett understood the risks and possible consequences to her reputation and privacy, but she declared herself ready to “take the gamble and be game.” As she knew from press coverage of her separation and divorce, newspaper headlines and stories could be sensational, even salacious. (The story was considered scandalous because Dennett’s husband wanted to leave her to form a commune with another family.)

Dennett cofounded the National Birth Control League, the first organization of its kind in the U.S., in 1915. Three years later, she launched the Voluntary Parenthood League, which lobbied Congress to change federal obscenity laws.

Sharon Spaulding / Dennett Family Archive

“Dennett believed that anyone who needed contraception should get it without undue burden or expense, without moralizing or gatekeeping by the medical establishment,” says Stephanie Gorton, author of Citizen Reporters: S.S. McClure, Ida Tarbell and the Magazine That Rewrote America. “Though she wasn’t fond of publicity, she was willing to endure a federal obscenity trial so the next generation could have accurate sex education—and learn the facts of life without connecting them with shame or disgust.”

In January 1929, before Ernst had finalized his legal strategy, Dennett was indicted by the government. Almost overnight, the trial became national news, buoyed by The Sex Side of Life’s earlier endorsement by medical organizations, parents’ groups, colleges and churches. The case accomplished a significant piece of what Dennett had worked 15 years to achieve: Sex, censorship and reproductive rights were being debated across America.

During the trial, assistant U.S. attorney James E. Wilkinson called the Sex Side of Life “pure and simple smut.” Pointing at Dennett, he warned that she would “lead our children not only into the gutter, but below the gutter and into the sewer.”

None of Dennett’s expert witnesses were allowed to testify. The all-male jury took just 45 minutes to convict. Ernst filed an appeal.

In May, following Dennett’s conviction but prior to the appellate court’s ruling, an investigative reporter for the New York Telegram uncovered the source of the indictment. A postal inspector named C.E. Dunbar had been “ordered” to investigate a complaint about the pamphlet filed by an official with the Daughters of the American Revolution (DAR). Using the pseudonym Mrs. Carl Miles, Dunbar sent a decoy letter to Dennett requesting a copy of the pamphlet. Unsuspecting, Dennett mailed the copy, thereby setting in motion her indictment, arrest and trial. (Writing about the trial later, Dennett noted that the DAR official who allegedly made the complaint was never called as a witness or identified. The activist speculated, “Is she, perhaps, as mythical as Mrs. Miles?”)

Dennett’s is a name that deserves to be known.

When news of the undercover operation broke, Dennett wrote to her family that “support for the case is rolling up till it looks like a mountain range.” Leaders from the academic, religious, social and political sectors formed a national committee to raise money and awareness in support of Dennett; her name became synonymous with free speech and sex education.

In March 1930, an appellate court reversed Dennett’s conviction, setting a landmark precedent. It wasn’t the full victory Dennett had devoted much of her life to achieving, but it cracked the legal armor of censorship.

“Even though Mary Ware Dennett wasn’t a lawyer, she became an expert in obscenity law,” says constitutional historian Weinrib. “U.S. v. Dennett was influential in that it generated both public enthusiasm and money for the anti-censorship movement. It also had a tangible effect on the ACLU’s organizational policies, and it led the ACLU to enter the fight against all forms of what we call morality-based censorship.”

Ernst was back in court the following year. Citing U.S. v. Dennett, he won two lawsuits on behalf of British sex educator Marie Stopes and her previously banned books, Married Love and Contraception. Then, in 1933, Ernst expanded on arguments made in the Dennett case to encompass literature and the arts. He challenged the government’s ban on James Joyce’s Ulysses and won, in part because of the precedent set by Dennett’s case. Other important legal victories followed, each successively loosening the legal definition of obscenity. But it was only in 1970 that the Comstock Laws were fully struck down.

Ninety-two years after Dennett’s arrest, titles dealing with sex continue to top the list of the American Library Association’s most frequently challenged books. Sex education hasn’t fared much better. As of September 2021, only 18 states require sex education to be medically accurate, and only 30 states mandate sex education at all. The U.S. has one of the highestteen pregnancy rates of all developed nations.

What might Dennett think or do if she were alive today? Lauren MacIvor Thompson, a historian of early 20th-century women’s rights and public health at Kennesaw State University, takes the long view:

While it’s disheartening that we are fighting the same battles over sex and sex education today, I think that if Dennett were still alive, she’d be fighting with school boards to include medically and scientifically accurate, inclusive, and appropriate information in schools. … She’d [also] be fighting to ensure fair contraceptive and abortion access, knowing that the three pillars of education, access and necessary medical care all go hand in hand.

At the time of Dennett’s death in 1947, The Sex Side of Life had been translated into 15 languages and printed in 23 editions. Until 1964, the activist’s family continued to mail the pamphlet to anyone who requested a copy.

 “As a lodestar in the history of marginalized Americans claiming bodily autonomy and exercising their right to free speech in a cultural moment hostile to both principles,” says Gorton, “Dennett’s is a name that deserves to be known.”

Activism

Censorship

Law

Sex

Sexuality

Women’s History

Women’s Rights

Women’s Suffrage

#History

[comrade-meow]

This is a transcript of a speech by developmental biologist Dr Emma Hilton delivered on 29 November 2020 for the ‘Feminist Academics Talk Back!’ meeting. This talk was originally published by womentalkback.org

Sex denialists have captured existing journals We are dealing with a new religion

Thank you for the invitation to speak today, as a feminist academic fighting back.

As ever, let’s begin with a story. And, trust me, by the end of this talk, you’re going to know a lot more about creationism that you expected:

1. In the 1920s, in concert with many other American states, the Tennessee House of Representatives passed the Butler Act, making it illegal for state public schools to: “teach any theory that denies the Story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible.” In other words, banning schools from teaching the theory of evolution.

Three months later, Tennessee science teacher John Scopes was on trial, charged with teaching the theory of evolution, a crime he was ultimately found guilty of. He was fined £71 – about £1064 in today’s money – so it could have been an expensive affair for him, had he not got off on a really boring administrative technicality.

Yet, despite the evidence against him and his own confession, he was an innocent man. Scopes was not guilty of teaching the theory of evolution. He admitted to a crime he had not committed. He even coached his students in their testimonies against him. So why would he admit to this wrongdoing of which he was entirely innocent? Why would he contrive apparent guilt? In protest. In protest against a law he viewed as fundamentally incompatible with the pursuit of scientific truth.

2. The history of creationism and education laws in the US is turbulent and often opaquely legalese, especially for those of us unfamiliar with US law. Some of the methods of the wider creationist movement, however, will be immediately recognisable as they are employed by a new movement, one which seeks to erase another scientific truth, the fact of sex.

Method 1. The framing of human classifications, whether it’s species or sex, as “arbitrary”. This leads to the premise that such phenomena are “social constructs” that need not exist if we chose to reject them. That truth must be relative and consensual. Never mind that these “arbitrary” classifications appear to be surprisingly similar classifications across all cultures and civilisations.

It also necessarily spotlights tricky boundary cases – not really a personal problem for the long-dead evolutionary missing links, but a very real problem in the modern world for people whose sex is atypical and who are constantly invoked, even fetishized, as “not males” or “not females” to prove sex classification is somehow no more than human whimsy.

People with DSDs have complex and often traumatic medical histories, perhaps struggling to understand their bodies, and they deserve more respect than to be casually and thoughtlessly used as a postemodernist “gotcha” by the very people so horribly triggered by a pronoun.

Method 2. The distortion of science and the development of sciencey language to create a veneer of academic rigour. Creationists invented “irreducible complexity” and “specified complexity” while Sex denialists try to beat people over the head with their dazzling arrays of “bimodal distributions arranged in n-dimensional space”.

Creationists, unable to publish in mainstream science journals because they weren’t producing, well, science, established their own journals. “Journals”. Sex denialists have captured existing journals – albeit limited to more newsy ones and to occasional editorials and blogs about gender (which is not sex), about how developmental biology is soooo complicated (which does not mean sex is complicated – I mean, the internal combustion engine is complicated but cars still fundamentally go forwards or backwards), about how discussing the biology of sex is mean (OK, good luck with that at your doctor’s surgery). Many such blogs and articles are written by scientists who simultaneously deny sex to their social media audience while writing academic papers about how female fruitflies make shells for their eggs (no matter how queer they are), about the development of ovaries or testes in fish and about how males make sperm.

The current editor-in-chief at Nature, the first female to hold this position, studied sex determination in worms for her PhD, and she now presides over a journal with an editorial policy to insert disclaimers about the binary nature of sex into spotlight features about research on, for example, different death rates in male and female cystic fibrosis patients.

The authors of the studies are not prevaricating or handwaving about sex, but the editorial team is “bending the knee”. I used to research a genetic disorder that was male-lethal – that is, male human babies died early in gestation. I’d love to know if this disclaimer would be applied there.

Method 3. Debate strategies like The Gish Gallop. This method is named for Duane Gish, who is a prominent creationist. What it boils down to is: throw any old argument, regardless of its validity, in quick succession at your opponent and then claim any dismissal or missed response or even hesitation in response as a score for your side. In Twitter parlance, we know this as “sealioning”, in political propaganda as the “firehose of falsehood”, although Wikipedia also suggests that it is covered by the term “bullshit”. So, what about intersex people? what about this article? what about an XY person with a uterus? what about the fa’afafine? what about that article? look at this pretty picture. what about what about whataboutery what about clownfish? The aim is not to discuss or debate, it is to force submission from frustration or exhaustion.

Method 4. The reification of humans as separate from not just monkeys but the rest of the living world. The special pleading for special descriptions that frame humans as the chosen ones, such that the same process of making new individuals, common to humans and asparagus, an observation I chose because it seems superficially silly – it could have been spinach – requires its own description, one that accounts for gender identity.

3. In the Scopes trial, which saw discussion of whether Eve was actually created from Adam’s rib and ruminations on where Cain got his wife, Scopes was defended by a legal group who had begun scouting for a test case subject as soon as the Tennessee ban was enacted. This legal group claimed to advocate for:

“Freedom of speech for ideas from the most extreme left such as anarchists and socialists, to the most extreme right including the Ku Klux Klan, Henry Ford, and others who would now be considered more toward the Fascist end of the spectrum.”

The legal group so keen to defend the right to speak the truth, in this case a fundamental, observable scientific truth? The American Civil Liberties Union, a group whose modern day social media presence promotes nonsense like:

“The notion of biological sex was developed for the exclusive purpose of being weaponized against people.”

and

“Sex and gender are different words for the same thing [that is] a set of politically and socially contingent notions of embodied and expressed identity.”

and shares articles asserting that biological sex is rooted in white supremacy.

Since the Scopes case, the ACLU have fought against many US laws preventing, or at least compromising, the teaching of evolution. I cannot process the irony of a group of people historically and consistently prepared to robustly defend the truth of evolution while now denying one of the most important biological foundations of evolution.

4. How do we fight this current craze of sex denialism? A major blow for creationism teaching was delivered in 1986 while the US Supreme Court were considering a Louisiana state law requiring creationism to be taught alongside evolution. The Louisiana law was struck down, in part influenced by the expert opinions, submitted to the court, of scientists who put aside their individual and, as one of them has since described “often violent” differences on Theory X and Experiment Y, to present a unified defence of scientific truth over religious belief. 76 Nobel laureates, 17 state academies of science and a handful of scientific organisations all got behind this single cause, and made a very real change.

Support for creationism has slowly ebbed away and the US is in a much more sensible position these days, although I still meet the occasional student from a Southern state who didn’t learn about evolution until college.

Sadly, one of the Nobel laureates has highlighted how unusual this collective response was and that he could not imagine any other issue that would receive the same groundswell of community support. Although he forged his career listening out for the Big Bang, so maybe I need to go through the list and find the biologists.

Part of the problem petitioning biologists to speak out is not necessarily fear of being cancelled or whatever, but simple lack of awareness of the issue, or incredulity that it is being taken remotely seriously. I’ve been working on a legal document and was discussing with a colleague about my efforts to find a citation for the statement, “there are two sexes, male and female”. He laughed at the idea that this would require a citation, told me to check a textbook, then realised that this statement is so simple that it would not even be included in a textbook.

And he’s right. I can find chapters in textbooks and hundreds of academic papers dedicated to how males and females are made, how they develop, how they differ, yet very few that feel the need to preface any of this with the statement “There are two sexes, male and female”. It is apparently something that biologists do not think needs to be said.

But of course, I think they are wrong, and that we live in a time where it does need to be said, where some aspects of society are being restructured around a scientific untruth, and where females will suffer.

Without recognition of and language to describe our anatomy, and the experiences that stem from that anatomy, mostly uninvited, we can neither detect nor measure things like rates of violence against women, the medical experiences, the social experiences of women and girls.

And, as for creationism, the reality of sex perhaps needs to be said by those with scientific authority, in unambiguous terms. Otherwise, we are living in a society that tolerates nonsense like there is no such thing as male or female, that differences evident to our own eyes are not real, that anatomies readily observable and existing in monkey and man alike do not actually exist. I’m sure this last assertion has the full support of the creationist community. And perhaps, as for creationism, a true tipping point will be tested when it is our children being taught these scientific untruths, or worse, when it is illegal to say different.

5. At the end of his trial, the only words Scopes uttered in court were these:

“Your honor, I feel that I have been convicted of violating an unjust statute. I will continue in the future, as I have in the past, to oppose this law in any way I can. Any other action would be in violation of my ideal of academic freedom—that is, to teach the truth as guaranteed in our constitution, of personal and religious freedom.”

I do not exaggerate when I say we are dealing with a new type of religion, a new form of creationism and a new assault on scientific truth. I also do not exaggerate when I say it may take a high profile court case to rebalance the public discourse around sex. There is only so far letters and opinion articles can go.

Two things I predict: 1. It will not be defended by the ACLU, and 2. With the recent proposals on hate speech law, it will probably involve a Scottish John Scopes, who finds themself in front of a judge for the seditious crime of discussing the sex life of asparagus at their dinner table.

Dr Emma Hilton is a developmental biologist studying aspects of human genetic diseases, and her current research focuses on a congenital motor neurone disease affecting the genitourinary tract, and on respiratory dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. She teaches reproduction, genes, inheritance and genetic disorders. Emma has a special interest in fairness in female sports. A strong advocate for women and girls, Emma tweets as @FondofBeetles.

[xanyoules]

The Dangers of Keyboard Psychologists, or, Why You Should Defend Narcissists

The internet is a beautiful, vital, historical tool in humanity’s quest for knowledge, freedom and connection however it has given vast platforms for problematic ‘hot takes’ when it comes to philosophical and medical questions. As humans, we think we know what psychology is, and that we have an unreserved right to wield our knowledge, slapping labels onto people, cultures and moments in time.

As a soon-to-be qualified psychologist, let me tell you: you do not.

The rise of articles and the twittersphere ranting about narcissism in particular, amongst other so-called personality disorders, has been endless. It’s often women who are given these psychological disorder labels for being ‘too’. Too Black (Megan Markle), too dramatic, too intelligent, too fierce, too empowered, too no-nonsense, too confident, too full of self worth, self esteem and self love. We like to label and we like to set ourselves apart from the broken. It’s quick, simple and easy to throw around labels we do not understand in order to demonise and ‘other’ a person we’re desperate to hate.

Take narcissism. Narcissistic Personality Disorder is having its moment in the spotlight as parts of Twitter and Tumblr position themselves as ‘empaths’, a community which believes they feel things more deeply than others. Narcissists, according to our woke keyboard warriors, are the antithesis of an empath: they are devoid of feeling empathy for others and are self-centred. I don’t have to tell you how curious it is that so many online are quick to centre themselves as ‘empaths’. An empath is, apparently, ‘better’ than a narcissist but in reality this is a build up of discourse that certain online communities wish to believe. Morally speaking, no label is good or bad. Indeed, science tells us that there are studies that suggest there are people with more ‘mirror neurons’ than others and could potentially mirror emotions more easily than others. However, the internet is not always fast or keen to study the science of its buzzwords and these days the ‘empaths v narcissists’ rhetoric has come to be a battle of good and evil, rather than genuine scientific discovery.

A individual who is displaying symptoms of narcissism certainly will be challenging for those around them. Narcissism can display in different ways but common behaviours can include the person struggling with any form of criticism, being very insecure and potentially lashing out due to that insecurity and they could — but won’t always — manipulate others in order to feel better about themselves. Narcissists also have an unwavering belief in their sense of righteousness; like all personality disorders it is complex and individual for whoever is affected by it.

We have seen some movements towards inclusion within health, especially mental health. Fantastic resources and media representations such as Crazy Ex-Girlfriend with its protagonist, Rebecca Bunch, navigating her diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder has shown us that those living with a label of personality disorder are still human. Education is always the cure for ignorance and a label is just that: a label. It doesn’t reduce or define an individual’s humanity. Your alleged ‘hot takes’ on that person you wish to denigrate being a sociopath, a narcissist, psychotic, take you down a path of conservative politics and ignorance. By attempting to depict someone as lesser and weaponising a psychological term you don’t know anything about — and embarrassingly, think works as a cutting insult — says more about your need for education and understanding than the person you’re clumsily attempting to harm. Mental health activism begins within, and it means challenging ourselves when we look to use psychology to berate another.

No one is born with a personality disorder. They are made, but that doesn’t mean they are not real. We exist in societies where capitalism and mass media has divided and conquered. We give no space for error. Neurotypicals reign terror amongst those of us who do not fit into their neat little boxes. It’s time for diversification, more than ever, and to those of you out there — BPD, NPD, ASPD, SPD and many more — we, the atypical, don’t have to conform to their narrow experience of humanity. My humanity is beautiful, and flawed, and difficult, and creative, and special, and warm, and terrifying, and fascinating. Paint outside the lines. Sing, and let their bland, grey voices fizzle out. We can fly and they cannot. I’ll meet you at the treetops.

[dietdrclinic]

Why is it important to consult and see a nutritionist?

With the hectic lifestyle and increasing work pressure it has become very important and challenging for us to maintain good health.

 But we do not know what the perfect quality of nutrients in a food are ; which all food groups we need to incorporate in our diet and where is the portion control required for our body in order to function effectively and stay healthy. Hence a nutritionist helps us for all the information to lead a fit, healthy and an active lifestyle. Unlike a doctor who will never tell you what and how much you need to eat. He might just be concerned with giving you treatments and medicines as per his profession or would just give you basic diet information if medical practice demands. But a nutritionist will not only help you to avoid the counter effect of medicines on your body but also help you to overcome some of the health and weight problems through diet and care. The nutritionist might askyou to follow the recommended guidelines only as given. Also, this highly qualified individual will not only be able to determine as to what exactly your diet needs but also which nutrients you might be lacking. There will be guidance to improve your eating habits as well.

 Proper nutrition helps to prevent disease. Eating a nutritious and proper eating routine offers various medical advantages that keep us mentally and physically well. It does not mean starving ourself but instead means eating a diet balanced in lean proteins, carbohydrates and fats.Nutritionists guide you that what type of food is best for you.

One of the biggest benefits in seeing a nutritionist is, obviously, if you’re looking to lose weight. Whether you have a slow metabolism, need calorie adjustments or need more information on what makes a food “healthy,” a nutritionist can help you as below:

 ·        1) A nutritionist helps you better understand what to eat. How much protein do you really need? Should you be drinking milk or no if you are lactose intolerant? She will let you know if you have gluten intolerance or if you have other food intolerances?

·      2)   A nutritionist gives you the discipline to make a change and see how your diet choices affect your body and mood. Is your afternoon slump caused by too little sleep or a sugar crash? Do you have more of sodas or do binge eating or lack exercise? Then here will be the regimen and diet you need to follow strictly!

·      3)   A nutritionist can provide practical strategies about incorporating proper eating into your life. How will you manage breakfast if you’ve got to be out the door early? What’s your dinner plan? What are your ‘Go to meal options’ OR ‘evening snacks’ OR what will you eat when you are in a party or going out to eat in a restaurant. In fact, if there is a very minute observation then you might be even asked to change your cooking oil or the way you cook!

The act of working with a nutritionist can empower you to own the change personally and professionally related to food choices.

 ·         A nutritionist truly understands that food is not a filler with proteins, fats and all but is more. It is the key reason that they can determine the deficiencies is each body and fill that up. Through food it is possible to have your body everything. And keep it detoxified. If this is done, you are safe from diseases. Disease are all either for a deficiency or some extra accumulation in the body.

 Proper nutrition keeps the body's biological balance be maintained and keeps you not only attractive but rock strong.

Getting a nutritionist online is a great idea because the guidance can be regular and spontaneous.

One of the most powerful medicines available to us all is food. Everything we eat either brings us closer to our goals of optimal health or takes us a few steps away from it. Food is nourishment for our body, our mind, and our soul. The true purpose of nutrition is to keep our body functioning.

Every single cell, metabolic process and hormone cascade is dependent on specific nutrients to work. Vitamins, minerals, phytochemicals, essential fatty acids, amino acids and various other nutrients are not only building blocks, but also master regulators of our bodies. When we move away from using nutrition to fuel our bodies the right way, we create space for symptoms and disease processes to start taking over. We then tend to turn towards pills and medicines to help fight off these symptoms, rather than going to the true sources of what the body is asking for.

Hence, I would call a nutritionist a life saver. But the irony is that many people do not know the difference between a nutritionist and a dietician. So, before you consult a nutritionist set your requirements correct as there is this difference below:

 Nutritionists work in public or community health, education, media or research. Anybody can call themselves a ‘nutritionist’, but only registered nutritionists can provide information about healthy eating for the public. However, they’re not qualified to give advice on diets for health conditions like diabetes or for patients in a hospital.

On the other hand, dietitians are qualified to provide medical nutrition therapy for people with health conditions. A dietitian is like a food doctor: using food to prevent, and help treat, disease. Together with your medical doctor’s treatment, a dietitian’s nutrition plan can help make food a type of medicine.

A dietitian is a nutritionist, but a nutritionist isn’t a dietitian. Infact, in some places, there is no criteria to claim the title nutritionist, and if you just wake up one day and decide you want to be a nutritionist, you are one, and there’s nothing anyone can do to stop you

What dietitians don’t do (that the other non-qualified ‘nutrition experts’ or non-registered nutritionists may):

·         Ban foods or food groups

·         Promote fad diets or quick fixes

·         Force you to follow a specific meal plan or eat special foods or supplements – unless you are unable to get enough from food alone and your Doctor prescribes you this

·         Believe in food myths that aren’t true

·         Sell you things for personal financial gain

 Instead, dietitians use high quality scientific research to guide you to a healthier lifestyle using the best-known methods out there. So before consulting you need to set your requirements right. If you are seeking any medical help or a health check, dietician is the one for you!

[semaglutidejourney]

Tell us about your company (Get Trim Tampa) . What problem does your company seek to solve? Who are your customers and how does your company uniquely meet their needs?

Get Trim Tampa is dedicated to addressing the widespread issue of effective and sustainable weight management. Our company offers a comprehensive suite of services designed to help individuals achieve their weight loss goals in a healthy and scientifically-backed manner.

The Problem

Many people struggle with weight loss due to the abundance of ineffective and often harmful fad diets and weight loss programs. Traditional methods can be overwhelming, lack personalization, and fail to provide long-term results.

Our Solution

Get Trim Tampa provides a solution by offering personalized, medically supervised weight loss programs. Our primary service includes the use of FDA-approved weight-loss medication Semaglutide, also known as GLP-1. This medication helps control hunger, delay stomach emptying, and reduce calorie intake, which are critical factors in successful weight management.

Our Customers

Our clients are individuals who are serious about achieving and maintaining a healthy weight. They include people who have tried and failed with other weight loss methods, those looking for medically supervised programs, and individuals seeking a structured and scientifically-based approach to weight loss.

Unique Approach

What sets Get Trim Tampa apart is our commitment to personalized care. We provide free consultations to understand each client’s unique needs and tailor our programs accordingly. In addition to weight loss medication, we offer various vitamin injections (such as B12, MIC + B12, and Lipo-C) to support overall health and enhance the weight loss process.

We also prioritize education and ongoing support, ensuring that clients not only lose weight but also adopt sustainable habits for long-term success. Flexible financing options and a dedication to customer satisfaction further distinguish us from other weight loss programs.

At Get Trim Tampa, we are passionate about empowering individuals to achieve their health goals through effective, personalized, and science-based weight management solutions.