#we (subjects) live in a society (object)
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Had a good chat with my partner about it today that maybe let me put a finger on what's always bugged me about "we're here to fix canon" attitudes being so prevalent in fandom (especially in the past 10ish years) throughout my life. This is not to say there's never a time or place for that (I've written fix its myself, or the occasional meta on how something could be fixed/improved) or that people are wrong to (we're anti fandom policing). It's also not an issue to me on the basis of "I love my blorbo in canon and fandom mischaracterizes them in the name of 'fixing' them" etc as it is just... coming from a fundamentally different perspective for story analysis / interaction than most (not all) people in fandom, I think.
One of the reasons I enjoyed getting my English degree was because I was finally being encouraged to and taught in alignment with what my brain had always be inclined to do: you always assume that there's a reason, and a good reason, for the story to do whatever it's doing. It assumes that the story is already exactly what it is supposed to be as it is supposed to be, and it's up to you to find the reasons Why.
The story was boring, or made you feel uncomfortable/bad, or you couldn't root for a character or relationship? All of that, at least at the beginning, doesn't really Matter. You assume that the story is paced fine, you assume the discomfort was intentional or part of something broader (historical shit that hasn't aged well) or that the dichotomy of "I feel invested or not invested" isn't useful. And in doing so, you replace all that with asking why.
An example I'll use is 1984 by George Orwell. I read that book in high school and I fucking hated it. Normally, I like the protagonist the most in anything I watch/read, but in that book, I loathed both the two leads and were actively rooting for them to be captured and tortured so the book could end faster; it was an actively miserable affair. I don't think that was necessarily the author's intention (certain amount of death of the author is baked in, but for a lot of the texts I was reading, we didn't even know the author or anything substantial about them, i.e. Beowulf) but, more importantly, I don't think any of those things are Flaws or downsides in the text.
Part of this is because 1984 is a dystopian novel (if a romcom book breaks genre convention that badly where you're miserable reading it, yeah, maybe something went wrong, but more on that in a minute) but even then it doesn't really matter on the basis of genre; I'm sure some people read 1984 and felt fascinated/excited while reading.
Rather, the focus becomes: what do I find so unlikeable about the protagonists? Why would they be written that way (on purpose)? What does it say about the society they live in? What does it say about their characterization, social stratification, etc etc? If a character does something that I think is non-sensical, why? Have I missed something? Should I watch retrospectively for clues? Is there another way to engage and to understand? Is what I label as confusion potentially a, or the, Point?
It is only after finding the reasons, and/or finding them unsuitable, that I let my subjective feelings into play. While a story can have great merit on the basis of relatability, relatability or "this aligns with my worldview / expectations / desires / etc." is not the be-all end-all of discerning quality
For example, I'm never going to be a fan of Jane and Rochester (she's 18, he's her 40 year old employer who routinely lies to her) but there are reasons, Good reasons, they get together in Jane Eyre (a book so subjectively boring I struggled through it twice) in response to both when the book was written and with the book's themes / symbols / their characterization. If they didn't end up together, it would be a fundamentally different story; it would not be Jane Eyre. So objectively, it's fine and an understandably massive influence on the western literary canon; subjectively, it's so fucking bad and I'm so glad I never have to read it again. But if I stopped there with my lack of interest or dislike of the main romance, I'd be missing out on what the text has to offer as well, the text.
This applies to more modern day stuff as well. I don't like Double Trouble from SheRa as nonbinary representation, and I'm nonbinary myself; however, I can acknowledge that the things I don't like about them were probably simultaneously empowering and exactly what the author (who is also nonbinary) wanted to be per his own experience of gender. Having a "I assume the text is right" mindset means that I can hold space for my own feelings/analysis (i.e. I also did not like Catra's arc, as I think she needed to learn other things / be written under a different lens) while holding space for the text as is (under the canonical lens of Catra learning it's never too late to be saved, I think her arc is conclusive and well done). And these two viewpoints aren't fundamentally opposed, but can coexist as analytical soup, being equally true / having equal value under the subjective (my view) and more 'objective' (the canon text's construction, or what I / the scholarly consensus, if it exists, believes it to be, anyway) at the same time.
Again, none of this is to say that you can't take issue with a canon text, or want to change something. I remember one time I was watching a show where their refusal to explore a romantic relationship between the female lead and her guy best friend was actively making the show worse; I understood their reasonings of wanting to put them with other people to explore their relationships, and wanting to emphasize a male-female friendship at the core of the story, and I still wanted them to put the two together as a Ship instead for various reasons. But that doesn't mean my line of thinking would've been Objectively Betterâassuming if they had been paired together would've been executed in the manner I'd enjoy, or that them being paired with other people couldn't have been executed in ways I would've enjoyed moreâmerely that I likely would've enjoyed the series more per my own subjective preferences.
What I see in fandom sometimes is that people, understandably, aren't approaching at the start from a "the story always has a good reason" as much as they are speed-running from a "this didn't make sense to me or felt bad/off" and maybe examining why (which is supremely useful!) but not going back to examine the other side of the coin as to why the story would do it anyway.
Because sometimes the storyâor a part of a storyâis still 'bad' to us. It's just worthwhile to look at why it's 'good,' too.
#dragons rambles#mine#writing#literature#analysis series#analysis#this is also the singular reason (beyond being able to explain thoughts) why i'm 'good' at analysis tbh#you just ask why. you assume there's a why. you assume there's a good why#only when the story stops giving compelling whys that don't fit into anything else going on does it start Declining tbh#atla fandom im looking at u#'i don't understand why kataang ended up together / the lion turtle energy bending' have u honest to god tried to#this is also reflected in how i write bc whenever my story changes it's underpinned with a feeling of#'this is always the way the story was i just didn't know it till now'#also contributes to taking 90% of things ppl say in good faith tbh
194 notes
·
View notes
Text
Finally finished Veilguard a few days ago and took some time to process and put my thoughts in order. In brief: 8/10 game as a whole, a really fantastic gaming experience, but 5 or even 4/10 as a dragon age game since it does no meaningful exploration of any nuance or moral complexity and seems to have forgotten what made Thedas distinct. My thoughts, critical and positive, coming from a place of love for the series with little to no spoilers:
Thedas has always been special to me because it was a nuanced world. Different groups had different opinions based on their pasts. City elves and the dalish had divergent histories. Injustice against magic was common, but you could understand the justification for it even when you didnât agree. Now, the worldbuilding is flattened. A mageocracy is fine, itâs only bad apples. Slavery is never addressed. City and dalish elves are basically the same but one lives in the forest. Thereâs no conflict about whatâs best from each individualsâ perception, all groups are monoliths.
âElves wonât follow the gods just because theyâre elves,â yes they would, in past lore. Perhaps not all but some would - these are their Creators. The game refuses to deal with religious belief in any meaningful way, to the point that I don't know if its impact is fully understood. Dalish religion is as much about cultural preservation as religion and it would be CRUSHING to lose that connection to the past when it had been all you could cling to for thousands of years.
And no, seeking out relics of Arlathan would not make up for the foundation of your society shattering and what that would mean to the dalish. Bellara being guilty that her gods are evil is not the takeaway I expected when I thought the dalish would explore that everything they believed was a lie. I'd also like to briefly comment on how an elf can comment that they werenât raised dalish but adopted their tattoos. Their closed practice tattoos. Closed even to city elves unless they fully joined a clan. Removing cultural boundaries didnât make the material less 'problematic', it just created a new blind spot.
âTheyâd never sanitize the Crowsâ I said before release. Assassins who walked the line between murderer and hero depending on perspective. But in this game they give you absolute truth: theyâre freedom fighters. Responsible government who, the mob is benevolent and that is never subverted. They see themselves as the 'good guys' and so they are.
âThey wouldnât put powerful mages in charge of the shadow dragonsâ I said. âSurely they will explore the nuance of Neve having the privilege of magic in a mageocracy even when she comes from a lower class beyond âeveryone is welcome in the shadow dragonsâ.â âSurely if Maevaris is connected her intersectionality as a magister and altus and trans woman will come up - not what Tevinter expects, helping with change, but still privileged and upper class. Surely low class non mages and slaves would be leading the Shadow Dragons, not the powerful being benevolent.â
But no. All factions in the game are black and white, good and evil, no moral complexity. The bad people want power and collect bad people who want power and only bad people do bad things. The antagonists I liked most were the ones with a motivation beyond simply power and they were few.
And thatâs setting aside the fact that all of the mystery and fantasy was removed from the setting by the end. The things that mattered before, the religious conflicts, the approaches to history? All false or meaningless now that we know absolute truth. Everything that set Dragon Age apart from generic fantasy was flattened. All of the lore for the world that I had spent hours, days, years in and creating fanfic for became simple groups of good and bad, subjectivity replaced by objective truth. Itâs not a world I want to unravel and explore anymore.
That hurts more than the slap in the face that was every cameo and past reference. If they wanted a soft reboot, why include them at all? Every time I saw or heard about a past character or event I felt hurt and angry and it actively harmed my experience of the game. When the choices are pared down to only do something "meaningful" with them and then that meaningful thing is a codex that had been so disdained in dev comments? I do feel pretty let down. Especially when that codex isnât even personalized.
They never use Rook or the inquisitorâs first name in text once. Vocal I get, but no codex? The Inquisitor, a person depersonalized into a symbol, signing off âYrs. The Inquisitorâ when we input their name in CC was a twist of the knife I didnât expect. Itâs like every time I lower my expectations to grant grace they need to be lowered yet again.
Similarly, the romances in the âmost romantic game yetâ are paper thin throughout the game depending on your choice, with few chances to truly connect on an emotional level and have deep conversations in some routes. Itâs not all about kissing but having the chance to say how you feel, or try to.
But thatâs part of a larger problem, that this is a âfound familyâ but Rook is the outsider in it. Rook isnât asked how theyâre handling things or about who they are or what they want except by Solas. The team needs them to fix problems but has little interest in giving back. The companions are lovely, but I canât help wishing they were friends with me and not just each other. Or wanted to romance me and not just each other, as they begin to flirt before I can and have more banter comments than the player romance. At least if no one got me I know Davrin got me.
These last comments are the reason itâs 8/10 as a game rather than 10/10 for me - the lore I care about but others wonât. The lack of connection is a genuine issue, along with how unbalanced it is depending on romance. I just feel sad at the lost potential to reflect and gain support from companions.
On a positive note, this is the most fun Dragon Age game Iâve ever played. The gameplay is top notch and combat is so fluid and fun. I felt excited to fight rather than dreading the next battle. Really getting into the roleplay of a slippery rogue
The environments are so gorgeous. Lighting, animation, level design, sound design, all spectacular. Iâm bad with maps and yet I never got lost and always managed to find my way around. Secret passages to treasure were just the right length to be satisfying. The puzzles were exactly the right amount of investment for the reward. I never felt frustrated by them but also not disappointed by the simple ones, there was a good balance. I had a lot of fun uncovering them. So many areas looked like a perfect representation of thedosian places I had never been to and wanted to visit.
Every time I was in the necropolis it felt like coming home. Maybe itâs because the lore was the most similar to past lore, maybe itâs just because it was cool, but I loved being there. I loved the wisps most of all. And I loved Emmrichâs journey and sympathetic exploration of death. The Hossberg Wetlands were also a standout area. Absolutely horrible (complimentary). Evka and Antoine my beloveds and the environment storytelling was fantastic. Like a hideous combination of the Fallow Mire and Chateau dâOnterre and I was so there for it. Davrinâs story broke my last flight loving heart.
The set pieces and narrative flow in the major battles and main story missions is really wonderful. I also did enjoy the faction reactivity, even if there were few chances to explore the intersectionality of being a particular lineage with a particular faction. Iâll make our House proud Viago!
Itâs such a fun game that when I play I can almost forget all of the things that I dislike until a codex or cameo punches me in the face. It has such great gameplay that I can finally discuss DA with my partner who refused to play the other games in the series. But what a monkeyâs paw. I know from their previous work that they can foster nuance. From the art book that their instincts were there from the beginning. But somewhere after multiple reboots they made a world with contradiction and complexity removed, more reactive to fan discourse than to telling a complex narrative.
It kills me because if the nuance and subjectivity and moral complexity had been there, I would have considered this the best Dragon Age game ever made. It will always be the most fun. But it is legitimately more fun for people who donât know lore than people who do, and that is soul-crushing. It's the most beautiful Thedas has ever been, and the least like Thedas it has ever felt.
Iâve played it once. I already started a replay. I enjoy the game a lot when I am playing it, overall. But I miss Thedas, and I miss that the âworld worth savingâ that I cared for is a slate wiped clean and this new world is a more simplistic place.
129 notes
·
View notes
Text
So the real crime of fascism was the application to white people of colonial procedures "which until then had been reserved exclusively for the Arabs of Algeria, the 'c***s' of India, and the 'n***s' of Africa." (p. 36) Here we must situate Cesaire within a larger context of radical black intellectuals who had come to the same conclusions before the publication of Discourse.
As Cedric Robinson argues, a group of radical black intellectuals,including W.E.B. Du Bois, C.L.R James, George Padmore, and Oliver Cox, understood fascism not as some aberration from the march of progress, an unexpected right-wing turn, but a logical development of Western Civilization itself. They viewed fascism as a blood relative of slavery and imperialism, global systems rooted not only in capitalist political economy but racist ideologies that were already in place at the dawn of modernity. As early as 1936, Ralph Bunche, then a radical political science professor at Howard University, suggested that imperialism birth to fascism. "The doctrine of Fascism" wrote Bunche, "with its extreme jingoism, its exaggerated exaltation of the state and its comic-opera glorification of race, has given a new and greater impetus to the policy of world imperialism which had conquered and subjected to systematic and ruthless exploitation virtually all of the darker populations of the earth." Du Bois made some of the clearest statements to this effect: "I knew that Hitler and Mussolini were fighting communism, and using race prejudice to make some white people rich and all colored people poor. But it was not until later that I realized that the colonialism of Great Britain and France had exactly the same object and methods as the fascists and the Nazis were trying clearly to use." Later, in The World and Africa (1947), he writes: "There was no Nazi atrocity-concentration camps, wholesale maiming and murder, defilement of women or ghastly blasphemy of childhood which Christian civilization or Europe had not long been practicing against colored folk in all parts of the world in the name of and for the defense of a Superior Race born to rule the world. The very idea that there was a superior race lay at the heart of the matter, and this is why elements of Discourse also drew on Negritude's impulse to recover the history of Africa's accomplish ments. Takirng his cue from Leo Frobenius's injunction that the "idea of the barbaric Negro is a European invention," Cesaire sets out to prove that the colonial mission to "civilize" the primitive is just a smoke screen. If anything, colonialism results in the massive destruction of whole societies-societies that not only function at a high level of sophistication and complexity, but that might offer the West valuable lessons about how we might live together and remake the modern world.
Robin DG Kelley's A Poetics of Anti Colonialism, published as introduction to a new edition of Aime Cesaire's Discourse on Anti Colonialism
596 notes
·
View notes
Text
Book Review 68 - Babel by R. F. Kuang
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/156c09e23144f245153f332516327280/6f805d57f19daefe-f7/s400x600/ddb21103dcc0cba8be88b454a184cde1302db2fd.jpg)
Overview
I came to Babel with extremely little knowledge about the actual contents of the book but a deep sense of all the vibes swirling around its reception â that it was robbed of a Hugo nomination (if the author didnât outright refuse it), that itâs probably the single buzziest and most Important sf/f release of 2022, that it was stridently political, and plenty more besides. I also went in having mostly enjoyed The Poppy War series and being absolutely enamoured by the elevator pitch of an alternate history Industrial Revolution where translation is literally magic. And, well-
It is wrong to say I hated this book, but only because keeping track of my complaints and starting organize this review in my head was entertaining enough to keep me invested in the reading experience.
The story is set in an alternate 1830s, where the rise of the British Empire relies upon the dominance of its translators, as it is the mixture of translation and silverworking, the inscription of match-pairs in different languages on bars of worked silver and the leveraging of the ambiguity and loss of meaning between them that fuels the worldâs magic. The protagonist is pluckted from his childhood home in Canton after his family dies in a cholera outbreak and whisked away to the estate of Professor Lowell, an Oxford translator he quickly realized is his unacknowledged father. Heâs made to choose an English name (Robin Swift) and raised and tutored as a future translator in service to the Empire.
The meat of the story is focused on Robinâs education in Oxford, his relationship with the rest of his cohort, and his growing radicalization and entanglement with the revolutionary Hermes Society. Things come to a head when in his fourth year the cohort is sent back to Canton to, well, help provoke the first Opium War, though none of them aware of that. The final act follows the fallout of that, by which I mean it lives up to the full title of âOr the Necessity of Violence: An Arcane History of the Oxford Translators' Revolutionâ.
To be clear, this was technically a very accomplished book. The writing never dragged and the prose was, if not exactly lyrical, always clear and often evocative. Despite the breadth of space and time the story covers, I never had any complaints about the pacing â and honestly, the ending was, dramatically speaking, one of the more natural and well-executed ones Iâve read recently. Itâs very well-constructed.
All that being said â allow me to apologize for how the rest of this is mostly just going to be a litany of complaints. But the book clearly believes itself to be an important and meaningful work of political art, which means I donât feel particularly bad about holding it to high standards.
Narrative Voice
To start with, just, dear god the tone. This is a book with absolutely zero faith in its audienceâs ability to reach their own conclusions, or even follow the symbolism and implication it lays down. Every important point is stated outright, repeated, and all but bolded and underlined. In this book set in 1830s England there are footnotes fact-checking the imperialists talking heads to, I guess, make sure we donât accidentally become convinced by their apologia for the slave trade? Everything is just relentlessly didactic, in a way that ended up feeling rather insulting even when I agreed with the points Kuang was making.
More than that, and this is perhaps a more subjective complaint but â for an ostensible period piece, the narrative voice and perspective just felt intensely modern? This was theoretically an omniscient third person book, with the narrative voice being pretty distinct from any of the actual characters â with the result that the implicit narrator was instead the sort of person of spends six hours a day getting into arguments on twitter and for this effort calls themselves a progressive activist. The identities of all the characters â as delivered by the objective narration â were all very neat and legible from the perspective of someone at a 2022 HR department listing how diverse their team was, which was somewhere between a tragic lost opportunity to show how messy and historical racial/ethnic/national identities are and outright anachronistic, depending. (This was honestly one of the bigger disappointments, coming from Kuangâs earlier work. Say what you will of The Poppy War series, the narration is with Rin all the way down, and it trusts the reader enough not to blink.) More than that it was just distracting â the narration ended up feeling like an annoying obstacle between me and the story, and not in any fun postmodern way either.
Characters
Speaking of the cast â they simply do not sound or feel like they actually grew up in the 19th century. Now, some modernization of speech patterns and vocabulary and moral commensense is just the price of doing business with mass market period pieces, granted, but still â no 19th century Anglo-Indian revolutionary is going use the phrase âNarco-military stateâ (if for no other reason than weâre something like a century early for ânarco-stateâ to be coined as a term at all). An even beyond feeling out of time most of the characters feel kind of thinly sketched?
Or no, itâs not that the characters are thinly sketched so much as their relationships are. Weâre repeatedly, insistently told that these four students are fast friends and closer than family and would happily die for each other, but weâre very rarely actually shown it. This is partly just a causality of trying to skim over a four-year university education in the middle third of one book, I think, but still â the good times and happy moments are almost always sort of skimmed over, summarized in the course of a paragraph or two that usually talk in terms of memories and consequences more than the relationships themselves. The points of friction and the arguments, meanwhile, are usually played out entirely on the page, or at least described in much more detail. In the end you kind of have to just take it as read that any of these people actually love each other, given that at least two of them seem to be feuding at any given point for the entire time they know each other.
Letty deserves some special attention. Sheâs the only white member of Robinâs cohort at Babel and she honestly feels like less of acharacter and more a collection of tropes about white women in progressive spaces? Even more than the rest, itâs hard to believe the rest of the class views her as beloved ride-or-die found family when essentially every time sheâs on screen itâs so she can do a microagression or a white fragility or something. Also, just â you know how relatively common it is to see just, blatantly misogynistic memes repackaged as anti-racist because it specifies âwhite womenâ? Thereâs a line in this that almost literally says âLetty wasnât doing anything to disprove the stereotype of woman as uselessly emotional and hystericâ.
Also, sheâs the one who ends up betraying the other three and trying to turn them in when they turn revolutionary. Which is probably inevitable given the bookâs politics, but as it happened felt like less of the shocking betrayal that it was supposed to be and more just, checking off a box for a dramatic reverse. Of course she turned on them, none of them ever really seemed to even like each other.
As a Period Piece
So, the book is set in the 1830s, in the midst of the industrial revolution and its social fallout, and the leadup to the First Opium War (which is, through the magic of, well, magic ,but also mercantilist economics, make into a synecdoche for British global dominion more broadly). On the one hand, the setting is impeccably researched, recent and relevant historical events are referenced whenever they would come up, and the footnotes are full to bursting with quotes and explanations of texts or cultural ephemera thatâs brought up in the narration.
On the other, the setting doesnât feel authentic in the slightest, the portrayal of the British Empire is bizarrely inconsistent, and all that richly researched historical grounding ends up feeling less like a living world and more like a particularly well-down set for a Doctor Who episode.
The story is incredibly focused around Oxford as a city and a university. Thereâs a whole authorâs note about the research and slight changes made into its geography and I absolutely believe its portrayal as a physical location and the laws about how women were treated and how the different colleges were organized and all that is exactly as accurate as Kuang wanted them to be. The issue is really the people. With the exception of a few cartoonish villains who barely get more than a couple pages apiece, no one feels, sounds like, or acts like they actually belong in the 19th century. The racism the protagonists struggle with all feels much more 21st century than Victorian, and the frame of mind everyone inhabits still comes across more as âunusually blatantly racist Englishmanâ than 19th century scholars and polymaths.
This is especially blatant as far as religion goes. Itâs occasionally mentioned, sure enough, but to the extent anyone actually believes in Christianity itâs of a very modern and disenchanted sort â this is a society that sends out missionaries as a conscious tool of colonial expansion, not because of anything as silly or absurd as actually wanting to spread their gospel. Also like, itâs Oxford, in the nineteenth century. For all the racism the protagonists have to deal with, they should be getting so much more shit from âwell-meaningâ locals and students trying to save their (one Muslim, one atheist, one probably Christian but black and protective of Haitian Vodou on a cultural level which would be more than enough) souls.
Or, and this is more minor, it is a central conceit of the whole finale that if a few (like, two) determined revolutionaries can infiltrate Babel theyâll be able to take the entire place hostage with barely any trouble. This is because the students and professors there are, basically, whimpy bookworms whoâll faint at the sight of blood and have no stomach for the sort of violence their work actually supports and drives. Which â look, I really donât want to defend the ruling class of Victorian Britain here, but Iâm not sure physical cowardice is really one of their failings, as a group? I mean, thereâs an entire system of institutionalized child abuse in the boarding schools they went to to get them used to taking and dealing out violence and abuse. Basically every upper-class sport is thinly disguised military drill or ritual combat (okay, or rowing). Half of them would graduate to immediately running off and invading places for the glory of the queen. Iâm not sure two sleep-deprived nerds with knives would actually have been able to cow the crowd here, is what Iâm saying. (This would stick out less if the text wasnât so dripping with contempt for them on precisely these grounds.)
Much less minor are our heroic revolutionaries themselves. And okay, this is more a matter of taste than anything but like â the Hermes Society is an illegal conspiracy of renegade current and former Babel scholars dedicated to using their knowledge of magic and access to university resources to oppose and undermine the British Empire in general and the work of the school in particular. Think Metternichâs worse nightmare, but in Oxford instead of Paris and focused on colonial liberation (continental Europe barely exists for the purposes of the book, Britain is Empire.) So! A secret society of professional revolutionaries in the heydey of just that, with a name that just has to be Hermetic symbolism, who concern themselves with both high politics and metaphysics.
They are just so very, very boring. This is the age of the Conspiracy of the Equals, the Carbonari, the Seasons! The literal Illumanti are still within living memory! Whereâs the pageantry, the ritual, the grandiosity? The elaborate initiation rituals and oaths of undying loyalty? Theyâre so pragmatic, so humble, so (and I know I keep coming back to this) modern. Itâs just such an utter wasted opportunity. Even beyond the level of aesthetics, these are revolutionaries with remarkably little positive ideology â the oppose colonialism and racism for reasons they take as self-evident and so donât feel the need to theorize about it (and talk about them with the vocabulary of a modern activist, because of course they do), but theyâre pretty much consciously agnostic as to what world should look like instead. They vaguely end up supporting a sort of petty-bourgeois socialism (in the Marxist sense), but the alliance with Luddites is essentially political convenience â they really donât seem to have any vision of the future at all, either in England or the various places they claim as homelands.
On Empire and Industrialization
The story is set during the early nineteenth century, so of course the Industrial Revolution is a pretty core part of the background. The Silver Industrial Revolution, technically, since the Babellers translation magic is in this world a key and load-bearing part of it. Despite the addition of miracle-working enhancers and supports to its fundamental technology, the industrial revolution plays out pretty identically to history â right down to the same cities becoming hubs of industry, despite steam engines using enchanted silver instead of coal and thus, presumably, the entire economic and logistical system that brought this particular cities to prominence being totally unrecognizable. This is not a book thatâs in any way actually about tracing how something would change history â which isnât a complaint, to be clear, thatâs a perfectly valid creative choice.
It does, however, make it rather galling that the single actually significant difference to history is that the introduction of magic turns the industrial revolution into a Legend of Zelda boss with a giant glowing weak point you can hit to destroy the whole enterprise.
On a narrative level, I get it â it simplifies things and allows for a far happier and more dramatic ending if destroying Babel is not just a symbolic act but also literally sends London Bridge falling down and scuttles the entire royal navy and every mill and factory in Britain. Itâs just that I think that by doing so it trades away any chance for actually making interesting commentary on anti-colonial and -capitalist resistance. A world where a single act of spectacular terrorism really can destroy a modern empire is frankly so detached from our world that it ceases to be able to really materially comment upon it.
Like, the principle reason to not take the Luddites as your role models is not that they were morally vicious but that they were doomed â capitalismâs ability to repair damage to infrastructure and fixed goods is legitimately very impressive! Trying to force an entire ruling class not to adopt a technology that makes whoever commits to it tremendous amounts of money (thus, power) is a herculean task even when you have a state apparatus and standing army â adding an âoffâ button to the lot of it just trades all sense of relevance for a satisfyingly cathartic ending.
(This is leaving untouched how the book just takes it as a given that the industrial revolution was a strictly immiserating force that did nothing but redistribute money from artisans to capitalists. Which certainly tracks as something people at the time would have thought but given how resolutely modern all the other politics in the work are rings really weirdly.)
All of which is only my second biggest issue with how the book presents its successful resistance movement. It all pales in comparison to making the Empire a squeamish paper tiger.
Like, the book hates colonialism in general and the British Empire in particular, the narrative and footnotes are filled with little asides about various atrocities and injustices and just ways it was racist or complicit in some particular atrocity. But more than that it is contemptuous of it, it views the empire as (as the cliche goes) a perpetually rotting edifice that just needs one good kick; that it persists only through the myth of its own invincibility, and has no stomach for violent resistance from within. Which is absolutely absurd, and the book does seem to know it on occasion when it off-handedly mentions e.g. the Peterloo Massacre â but a character whose supposed to be the grizzled cynical pragmatic revolutionary still spouts off about how slave rebellions succeed because their masters arenât willing to massacre their own property. Which is just so spectacularly wrong on every axis its actually almost offensive.
More importantly, the entire final act of the story relies upon the fact that the British Empire would allow a handful of foreign students seize control of a vital piece of infrastructure for weeks on end and do nothing but try to wait them out as the national physically falls apart around them. Like, câmon, there would be siege artillery set up and taking shots by the end of week two. As with the Oxford students, the Victorian elite had all manner of flaws â take your pick, really â but squeamishness wasnât really one of them.
On Magic
So the magical system underlying the whole story is â you know how Machinaries of Empire makes imperial ideology and metaphysics literally magical, giving expert technicians the ability to create superweapons and destroy worlds provided that the Hexarchateâs subjects observe the imperial calendar of rites and celebrate its triumphs/participate in rituals glorying in the torture of its âhereticsâ? Itâs not exactly a subtle metaphor, but it works.
Babel does something similar, except the foundational atrocity fueling the engine of empire on a metaphysical level is, like, cultural appropriation. As an organizing metaphor, I find this less compelling.
Leaving that aside, the story makes translation literally capable of miracle-working â which of necessity requires making âlanguagesâ distinct natural categories with observable metaphysical boundaries. It then sets the story in the 19th century â the era of newborn nation states and education systems and national literatures, where the concept of the national-linguistic community was the obsession of the entire European intelligentsia. Now this is not a book concerned with how the presence of magic would actually have changed history, in the slightest, but like â given how fascinated it is by translation and linguistics youâd think the whole âa language is a dialect with a navyâ clichĂ© would at least get a light mention (but then the book doesnât really treat language as any more inherent or natural than it does any other modern identity category, I suppose.)
As an Allegory
Okay, so having now spent an embarrassing number of words establishing to my own satisfaction that the book really doesnât work at all as a period piece, let us consider; what if it wasnât trying to be?
A great many things about the book just fit much better if you take it as a commentary on the modern university with Victorian window-dressing. Certainly the driving resentment of Oxford as an institution that sustains itself and grows rich off the exploitation of international students it considers second-class seems far more apt applied to contemporary elite western schools than 19th century ones. Likewise the racism the heroes face all seems like the kind youâd expect in a modern English town rather than a Victorian one. Iâm not well-versed enough on the economics of the city to know for sure, but I would wager that the gleeful characterization of Oxford as a city that literally starts falling to ruin without the university to support it was also less accurate in the 1830s than it is today.
Read like this, everything coheres much better â but the most striking thing becomes the incredible vanity of the book. This is a morality tale where the natural revolutionary vanguard with the power to bring global hegemony to its knees through nothing but witholding their labour are..students at elite western universities (not, I must say, a class Iâd consider in dire need of having their egos boosted). The emotions underlying everything make much more sense, but the plot itself becomes positively myopic.
Beyond that â if this is a story about international students at elite universities, it does a terrible job of actually portraying them. Or, properly, it only shows a certain type; just about every foreign-born student or professor we meet is some level of revolutionary, deeply opposed in principle to the empire they work within. No one is actually convinced by the carrot of a life as an exploited but exceedingly comfortable and well-compensated technician in the imperial core, and thereâs not really acknowledgement at all of just how much of the apparatus of international institutions and governments in the global south â including positions with quite a bit of real power â end up being staffed by exactly that demographic who just sincerely agree with the various ideological projects employing them. Kuang makes it far too easy on herself by making just about every person of colour in the books one of the good guys, and totally undersells how convincing hegemonic ideology can be, basically.
The Necessity of Violence
This is a pet peeve and itâs a very minor thing that I really wouldnât bring it up if that wasnât literally part of the title. But it is, so â itâs a plot point thatâs given a decent amount of attention that Griffin (Robinâs secret older brother, grizzled professional revolutionary, his introduction to anti-colonialism) is blamed for murdering one of his classmates who had the bad luck to be studying while he was sneaking in to steal some silver â a student that was quite well-loved by the faculty and her very successful classmates, who have never forgiven him. Later on, itâs revealed that this is an utter rewriting of history, and sheâd been a double agent pretending to let herself be recruited into the Hermes Society whoâd been luring Griffin into an ambush when he killed her and escaped.
This is â well, the most predictable not-even-a-twist imaginable, for one, but also â just rank cowardice. You titled the book âthe necessity of violenceâ, the least you can do is actually own it and show that violent resistance means people (with faces, and names, not just abstractions only ever talked about in general terms) who are essentially personally innocent are going to end up collateral damage, and people are going to hold grudges about it. Have some courage in your convictions!
Translation
Okay, all of that said, this isnât a book thatâs wholly bad, or anything. In particular, you can really tell how much of a passion Kuang has for the art and science of translation. The depth of knowledge and eagerness to share just about overflows from the page whenever the book finds an excuse to talk about it at length, and itâs really very endearing. The philosophizing about translation was also as a rule much more interesting and nuanced then whenever the book tried to opine about high politics or revolutionary tactics.
Anyways, I really canât recommend the book in any real way, but it did stick in my head for long enough that Iâve now written 4,000 words about it. So at the very least itâs the interesting sort of bad book, yâknow?
427 notes
·
View notes
Note
so I've been watching a lot of videos abt food that's uniquely Hong Kong and y'know with all the changes happening there I had a thought like hm is this preservation and documentation of cultural foods that are at risk of being lost?
and then I thought gosh this sounds familiar likkke everywhere we see violent colonization occur not only are lives and freedom lost but also language culture food
and then I wanted to ask you as a historian: has this always been the case? have people always had low key anxiety about culture "loss" or did they think of it a diff way? is this framing of colonization and cultural loss a recent one?
I'm realizing this is a big question and we are all le tired from les recent events, so pls view this as a no pressure ask, I just uh figured you're the only historian I have real access to haha
This is an important question that I don't currently have the mental wherewithal to answer in great depth, but I think it's important to speak to briefly. And I'll put it this way: yes, human beings have always felt that their culture, their way of life, their present existence, their friends and family, and the forces at work against them are tenuous, uncontrollable, and prone to sudden and violent destruction. I'd say it's one of the key themes of being human. I'll cite the famous example of the 8th-century Old English elegy The Ruin of the Empire, known usually as The Ruin:
This is what many of us would consider the dark and distant past, wherein an unknown person in Anglo-Saxon England is observing the ruins of the Roman Empire in Britain and reflecting on how fragile and frightening the present day feels, as if all the glory has faded into the past, as if things will not be "great" anymore, and the present is just moving inexorably toward darkness:
Bright were the castle buildings, many the bathing-halls, high the abundance of gables, great the noise of the multitude, many a meadhall full of festivity, until Fate the mighty changed that. Far and wide the slain perished, days of pestilence came, death took all the brave men away; their places of war became deserted places, the city decayed. The rebuilders perished, the armies to earth.
And yet... that was the 8th century. That was a very long time ago. A lot of history has happened since then, and despite everything, it's still here. People have always looked at the danger and fragility of their present situation and yearned for the perceived stability of the past. Indeed, the reason we have the myth of the "Dark Ages" is largely thanks to the 14th-century Italian humanist Petrarch, who looked at the (also objectively very, very crappy) 14th century, which is similar to now in a lot of ways, and built the shining myth of the Greco-Roman era as a bygone golden age that society needed to reinstate if it was going to save itself from self-inflicted destruction. This in turn gave rise to the Renaissance, which was intensely a cultural project to reclaim and re-instate a seemingly "better" past in the face of present-day chaos and uncertainty. This included a strict reifying of gender roles (etc. etc. Was There a Renaissance For Women?) and turn toward "purer" social ideals.
Anyway: these concepts have been shaped and articulated differently in various historical periods. But yes, the basic feeling that we are losing ourselves somehow, that the past was better and more stable, that the present challenges can be solved by insular reactionary politics, and so forth, is a very, very common human experience. For better or worse: both tangible and intangible artifacts have always been lost, destroyed, subject to violent sociopolitical conquest attempts, written out of history, and used for oppressive political and cultural processes. Part of the reason the right wing is doing so well worldwide right now is because they are tapping into a very, very old "put the strongman in charge and everything will go back to how [good] it used to be" mythology that is also as old as dirt and time, and which humans just keep doing when things feel existentially scary. This "weaponized nostalgia" is even more of an issue in the age of rampant disinformation, AI, and fake-news bubbles which can totally create what is accepted as reality, very often to the benefit of illiberal, right-wing, authoritarian forces. That is very hard to deal with and overcome, and I don't think we're anywhere near doing it.
That, therefore, is the bad news. The good (as it were) news is that at least these cultural processes and human instincts are not new, and indeed have continued for a long, long time. And even when these old things are destroyed, new ones emerge as well. So yeah.
107 notes
·
View notes
Text
Ratiorine/Aventio Mirror AU where Ratio is part of the Genius Society and Aventurine is a Masked Fool. Yes, I know it goes against the point of their characters, Ratio's especially. However, what if we took the other core aspects and reapplied it to the new background and context?
Genius Society member Dr. Ratio whose love for humanity manifested differently, enough to get a glance from Nous. Genius Society member Dr. Ratio who believes in humanity so much that he pursues knowledge in its rawest form knowing that someone somewhere will eventually pick up the pieces of his research and do something with it. Genius Society member Dr. Ratio who searches for the untarnished truth, who studies all the intricacies of subjects most helpful to humanity, who lays down the foundation of objective information for future scholars to build off of. Genius Society member Dr. Ratio who is a utilitarian when it comes to the good of humanity, who lets the passage of time bring him the fruits of his efforts, who makes necessary sacrifices for the greater good.
Masked Fool Aventurine who accepted the Tavern's invitation, whose thirst for survival manifests in the manner of technicalities. Masked Fool Aventurine who seeks the thrill of living in the present, seeks hedonistic pleasures in daily life, makes big gambles just so he can feel the rush of exhilaration with every win. Masked Fool Aventurine who lives and dies and is reborn with every new identity, with every mask he puts on, with each different name he wears. Masked Fool Aventurine who impersonates all the people he's lost in hopes of seeing them alive one way or another, who plays into his stereotypes so that even small remnants of his roots survive (even in the ways that aren't fun, because negative attention is still attention). Masked Fool Aventurine who loses himself in the frivolities of a fool, who slowly forgets his original name and face.
It all starts as a game, at first. You know, those stuck-up geniuses are so fun to mess with. They're so uptight and serious, can't they just lighten up a little? Ah, but they're not immune to nonsensical antics. For the quintessential component of a scholar is curiosity, and the most curious thing to a genius is the mind of a fool. Just like that: hook, line, and sinker. The masked gambler reels in the good doctor, who had been following his little trail of clues all this time...
"I finally caught you, gambler." "Hah, as expected of the esteemed doctor. It didn't take you long to figure me out." "You've made yourself into quite the enigma, though it is one not impossible to solve for someone like me." "Of course, of course. Now, why don't you put that oh-so-intelligent brain of yours into solving something else instead?" "What do you mean to imply?" "A genius's job is to discover the unknowns, is it not? I wonder... if rediscovery is on the agenda, too." "With time comes the inevitability of outdated data or newfound truths. I suppose it is not out of the question, depending on its purpose." "What if the purpose was something... selfish?" "It would not faze me, for it is nothing new to me." "My, how scandalous! Well then..." "You fool, what are youâ" "My original face and name. Can you find them for me, darling doctor?"
94 notes
·
View notes
Text
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/52104beb74a10a22e2828afbf9c208ed/23abb5c0d0cbd5ea-96/s1280x1920/0c5165d519bb338d0f7cb92fc56fb0c57a212840.jpg)
Living in society is a challenge because sometimes we are trapped by certain norms that force us to follow rules that limit our being or our non-being... By this I mean that we have, at least, two personalities: the objective one, which everyone around us knows; and the subjective... At times, this appears so mysterious that if we ask - Who are we? We won't know for sure! Now I know one thing for sure: we must always be authentic, people need to accept us for who we are and not for what we appear to be... Herein lies the eternal conflict of appearance x essence. What a challenge, huh? "Never suffer for not being a thing or for being."
(Clarice Lispector)
64 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Feature XXI // Benedict Cumberbatch x Reader
Series Overview | Previous Part | First Part
Chapter Summary: (Female Reader) While on assignment at another glamorous event, Quinn takes the opportunity to have some fun. Though it doesn't quite go the way she'd hoped.
Chapter Word Count: 8K
Chapter Warnings: Morally-grey reader, strong language, adult and sexual themes, tones of jealousy and possessiveness, fake event, op-ed excerpts contain graphic imagery. Quinn back at it again with her nightmarish antics. Readers must be 18+
Join the Tag List Here*
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/5ccdf52d2e916116b0e1ccb43e2ec78d/50167d3c0143622a-b4/s540x810/63549ad4c45e777e28194d258ec9e6cd141b842e.jpg)
Julia would bounce her knee when she sat at her desk; one leg crossed over the other, the heel of her Louboutin slingback clinking against the table leg with an irritating rhythm. You were sitting across from her as she read your final draft, your gaze focused on the blood red sole of her shoe, the remnants of the discount sticker she hadnât fully peeled off.Â
She placed the papers on the desk and cleared her throat. You looked up at her, only then realising youâd been making a face; eyes narrowed, lip curled disdainfully. It wasnât intentional, your face just settled that way sometimes. So you softened your edges, rounding your eyes and relaxing your jaw as you waited for her to speak.
âQuinnâŠâ she sighed.
Your thorns quickly returned; lids turning heavy with indignation as you rolled your shoulders and pressed your back into the chair.
âYou know what Iâm going to say,â she continued with a patronising smile. âItâs well written, thereâs no denying that, but itâs not going in the mag.â
âWhy not?â you asked bluntly.Â
She picked up the papers and licked her thumb, using it to flick to the second page where she began to read aloud. âI just wanted those men to stop looking at me. I wanted to erase myself, piece by piece, I imagined my face sloughing away, then my arms, my breasts, until there was nothing left but a pool of flesh and marrow where Iâd once stood. But then, I thought, would they even care? Or would they still find pleasure in my remains; dig their hands into the slurry and let it slip between their fingers. And that scared me more than disappearing altogether...â
You blinked at her, waiting for her to explain the problem. But the way she was looking at you made it seem like you should have already known.Â
âItâs quite graphic,â she said.
âItâs a metaphor.âÂ
âYes, obviously I understand that. But itâs not the most pleasant of visuals, is it? Really, the topic of the op ed on a whole, itâs- Itâs dark, heavy-â
âItâs about gender, sex, inequality, how Iâve learned to navigate society as a woman, itâs not meant to be all bubblegum and rainbows. And itâs not like the magazine hasnât shed light on these kinds of topics before.â You shrugged.
âYes but not this⊠Brutally.âÂ
You furrowed your brow.Â
She sighed, flicking to another page. âI thought sex was supposed to make me human, make me whole. But in the end, he was just a prop, an object. They all were. I could always tell they wanted me to love them, and they thought I might if they gave me everything. But nothing ever seemed worth taking.â She looked at me. âYou canât seriously think Draft would publish this?â
âItâs an op ed,â you said, your tone growing snippy. âItâs supposed to be personal, subjective, opinionated-â
âBut thereâs a fine line, Quinn, between sharing your views and experiences on important topics and oversharing to the point where it becomes disturbing and completely indigestible for readers.â
âDisturbing?â You breathed out a laugh. âSo this, a womanâs real, lived experience of men and sexuality and emotional connection is âdisturbingâ, but the piece we let that dick head comedian write back in August where he said Hitler âwasnât such a bad guyâ was okay?âÂ
âIt was a joke he made in poor taste and a retraction was published almost immediately.â
âStill made it to print though.âÂ
She pinched the bridge of her nose, exhaling slowly. âLook, Iâm not saying this isnât a good piece of writing. Because it is. I know youâve been working on it for months and it shows. Itâs important and itâs relevant, I get that. But we have to give readers balance; some escapism, yâknow. And thatâs the job of our staff writers, to uplift the magazine with stories about celebrities and fashion and lifestyle and-â She sighed. âWe have the hard hitting stuff covered. What we need from you is-â
âFluff.â You inhaled sharply through your nose and crossed your arms over your chest. âI just thought after the Benedict Cumberbatch interview and how well it was received I might finally get to write something with more⊠substance.âÂ
She let out a single, clipped laugh, shaking her head at you condescendingly. âQuinn, one feature on a big name celeb doesnât fast track you to serious journalism. You wrote about his films, his love life, what he does in his spare time. It wasnât exactly an exposĂ©.âÂ
You bit back a retort, crossing one leg over the other and glancing out at the office through the glass wall. âWhat did Ellen Ford say about it? The op ed.â
âI havenât shown her. And Iâm not going to.â
âJulia-â
âIâm not having this conversation anymore, Quinn. I was given this position permanently because I know what Iâm doing. Ellen trusts my judgement and my judgement is that this piece is a no go. If you want to write something for the next issue then you can cover the London Arts and Culture Gala tonight. Kate was supposed to be going but she just called to say sheâs sick.â
You groaned, pressing your fingers into your eyes. âWhy do you keep sending me to fucking galas?âÂ
She tutted sarcastically, pushing out her bottom lip. âGetting dressed up to have free food and drink while rubbing shoulders with celebrities all night, how evil of me.âÂ
You glared at her.Â
âI hear Benedict Cumberbatch is on the guest list,â she said, a slight snarkiness in her tone. âMaybe you can cosy up to him, get yourself a follow up interview. Not exactly Pullitzer material but hey, itâs another step towards those doors youâre so desperate to open.âÂ
You already knew Ben was going to be there. You wanted to tell her that you knew; that heâd told you about it as you lay together in bed last night - still not having sex, to your utter dismay - and that youâd scoffed when he asked if you were covering it for the magazine. You wanted to punch her for suggesting you cosy up to him, as though he was nothing more than a rung in the ladder of your career.Â
âThe last editorial assistant that suggested I get âcosyâ for a story ended up escorted out of here by security,â you said with a cold, flat smile.
She held your gaze, her foot bouncing more quickly now. âI know you like to think the worldâs against you, Quinn. But I actually think youâre a good journalist. Hence why I keep sending you to fucking galasâŠâÂ
You paused a moment before finally giving in and standing up with a huff. âCan I get another dress?âÂ
 âIâm sure you have something at the back of your wardrobe you could wear.âÂ
You rolled your eyes, leaning over and snatching your papers off the desk before turning to leave her office.Â
The back of your wardrobe had provided you two options: the first was a short, bright chartreuse dress with a boned bodice and sparkly straps. It was awful. So awful that you grimaced when you pulled it out, wondering what kind of fugue state youâd been in when you bought it. But then you noticed the tag was still attached, realising you must have come to your senses and decided to never let it touch your body or see the light of day again.Â
The second option was plain, black, high neck and sleeveless. It hugged your figure like a second skin, skimming just above your ankles as you stood on your tiptoes in front of the mirror. You wondered why youâd never worn it before. Then you remembered youâd bought it for a funeral, only to get it home and realise your dead uncleâs family probably wouldnât appreciate being able to see the outline of your arse at his wake.Â
You put your hair up and did your makeup, feeling pangs of excitement in your stomach at the thought of seeing Benâs face when you arrived. You hadnât told him you were coming, much preferring the idea of him spotting you from across a crowded room, having to hide his surprise and keep his cool, to pretend he barely remembered your name. You slipped into a pair of heels, stuffing your ticket and press pass into your bag alongside a notepad and pen, your fully charged phone and the perfume he always complimented.Â
When you arrived at the Claridgeâs hotel, you stepped out of the cab to a mob of flashing cameras lining the carpeted entrance. There was something humbling about being unimportant, being able to weave through a sea of celebrities and influential figures like a ghost as paparazzi screamed for them to stop and pose for photos. It was comforting, almost, to be overlooked.Â
You made your way inside, the grand hall warmly lit with ornate chandeliers, large round tables covered in pristine tablecloths and floral centrepieces. The room buzzed with the sound of clinking glasses and reserved conversation, servers weaving between guests with trays of champagne and dainty canapĂ©s. You took a glass from a waiter with the most dazzling smile youâd ever seen, unable to resist a glance at his backside as he walked away.Â
The press table was at the other end of the hall. You took a large swig of champagne and began the long walk, meandering through tables and crowds of famous faces you never got used to seeing in person. Olivia Colman was at a table to your left, close enough for you to reach out and touch her - and you thought about it, just for a moment - but you resisted.Â
You hadnât been watching where you were going, an elbow almost knocking the drink from your hand as you walked right into it. You looked up to see an actor you recognised but couldnât remember the name of, his surprise softening to a friendly laugh as he placed his hands on your arms to steady you.
âAre you okay?â he asked.
âSorry,â you said. âI was distracted by Olivia Colman.âÂ
âAh, weâve all been there,â he replied.Â
He was tall, smartly dressed, with a crooked smile and reddish hair. Heâd been in a TV show you watched. Or was it a movie? God, what the hell was his name?Â
You gave an awkward laugh. âSorry again.âÂ
He waved his hand, as if telling you not to worry. You smiled appreciatively and turned to walk away, but his voice suddenly made you halt.
âBenedict! Howâve you been, man?âÂ
You glanced back over your shoulder to see him pulling another tall, suited man into a hug, the pair smacking each other hard on the back in that weird way only men ever seemed to do. The corner of your mouth curled, threatening a smirk when you saw the side of Benâs face.
You tilted your head, waiting for him to notice you. And when he did, it was as delicious as youâd imagined it would be. It began with a flicker of recognition, followed by the slow widening of realisation, his expression changing so subtly that only someone who knew him as well as you did would notice.
He composed himself quickly, giving the man heâd been hugging a final, firm pat on the back before stepping away with a slight smile. You kept your face neutral as you stood in his eyeline, as if seeing him was no big deal, as if you hadnât spent the majority of your evening fantasising about this very moment; the way his eyes travelled down your body, his jaw clenching as he lingered on your curves. You brought the glass to your lips, taking a slow sip of champagne, never looking away from him as he tried to engage in polite conversation.Â
It didnât take long for him to excuse himself, squeezing the manâs shoulder as he stepped around him and made his way towards you, his long strides closing the distance far too quickly. Youâd wanted to make the moment last, to savour it, make him sweat a little while longer.
âQuinn,â he said, his voice low and warm as he came to a stop in front of you.Â
âBenedict,â you replied coolly, giving a slight nod.
He glanced around before returning his gaze to you. âYou said you werenât coming.â
You smiled, giving a casual shrug. âDidnât think it was worth mentioning.â
He gave you a look, one that told you he wasnât buying it. Then his eyes flitted down again, taking you in once more. âYouâŠâ He trailed off, his gaze returning to your face, and for a second you thought he might lose his composure. âYou look⊠Nice.â
âNice?â you repeated, feigning offence.Â
His mouth twitched, his voice darkening. âVery nice.â
You could feel his restraint, the effort it was taking for him not to touch you, to close the distance between you.
âSo.â He cleared his throat. âI take it youâre here for the magazine?âÂ
You rolled your eyes dramatically, taking another sip of champagne. âMhm. Julia, the editorial assistant, completely shat all over my piece, decided I was more useful rubbing shoulders than writing anything of actual substance.âÂ
His brows came together for a moment with a sympathetic smile. âWell clearly sheâs an idiot.â
âTell her that.âÂ
He leaned in slightly. âIâll tell her, if you want.âÂ
You laughed and rolled your eyes again. âYeah, thatâll go down well; getting the guy Iâm fucking- sorry, not fucking, to pull strings for me at work.âÂ
He smirked, dropping his head and fixing the cuff of his blazer. âJust say the word.â
âStop it,â you laughed, holding back the urge to push him playfully in the chest.Â
âWell I suppose thereâs worse assignments you couldâve ended up with.âÂ
âYeah.â You looked around at the glitzy hall, the man heâd been talking to finding his seat at a table. âOh my god, whatâs his name by the way? Itâs been driving me mad.âÂ
He looked over to where youâd pointed before turning back and opening his mouth to speak. But before he could, a sudden presence appeared at his side.Â
âBenedict, good to see you again!â
You recognised Leo McGrath immediately. He was a documentary filmmaker, award winner, known philanthropist. Yet it was his recent appearance at the Oscars that had shot him to sudden, unexpected internet fame. You wondered what it must feel like, to be so unbelievably attractive that just standing there on a red carpet could send the whole world into a frenzy. To have millions of people suddenly know you, not because of your work, but because they fancied you.Â
It was true, he was undeniably stunning; green eyes framed by masses of dark lashes, full lips and thick wavy hair long enough to tuck behind his ears. When he smiled, his cheeks dimpled, his imperfect teeth giving him a charm that made it hard not to swoon, even just for a second.Â
âAh, Leo,â said Ben as he shook his hand. âItâs good to see you too. Howâve you been?âÂ
âGood, yeah, itâs been⊠intense.â He breathed out a laugh, running a hand through his hair.Â
âI can imagine.âÂ
âWell I suppose you donât need to imagine, youâve been there too. What did they call you? The Internetâs Boyfriend?âÂ
Ben rolled his eyes, nodding with a laugh.
Leoâs gaze shifted to you, his eyes lighting up as if he hadnât noticed you until now. âSorry, Iâm so rude!â he said, reaching out to shake your hand.
âOh, of course, sorry. Leo, this is Quinn Armitage. Sheâs a writer for Draft.âïżœïżœ
âPleasure to meet you, Quinn,â he said, looking you up and down, far less subtly than Ben had.
You shook his hand with a smile, catching a fleck of irritation on Benâs face. âLikewise. And congratulations on your Oscar win.âÂ
âAh, thank you very much.â He took a step back, his eyes bouncing between the two of you. âSo are you here together, or?âÂ
âNo,â Ben replied, and you couldnât help but raise an eyebrow at the speed of his response. âQuinn wrote a piece on me at the end of last year. We were just catching up.â Â
âOh right.â He seemed pleased to learn you were there alone, his interest in you piquing, attention lingering on your face. âSo youâre here for work then?â
You nodded, watching Benâs jaw tighten from the corner of your eye, like he was grinding his teeth. You held back a grin; the sight of him ruffled was a rarity, and you couldnât help but take some pleasure in it.
âWell you should join me at my table,â said Leo. âItâs near the front, a much better spot for you to get some good material.âÂ
You glanced up at Ben, the slight flush in his cheeks, how hard he was having to work to stay calm. He was jealous. You liked it.Â
âYeah,â you said with a smile. âThat sounds good, Iâll take you up on that offer.â
He gestured for you to follow him, and you did, meeting Benâs gaze as you stepped aside and began to walk away. You couldnât hold back the smirk as you watched his eyes darken, a silent warning etched on his stony, unamused face.Â
You followed Leo to his table, the weight of Benâs eyes heavy on the back of your neck. You couldnât help but feel excited, perhaps even satisfied; Leoâs sudden interest in you was undeniably flattering, and Benâs barely contained jealousy made it all the more enjoyable.
He pulled out a chair for you and you thanked him as you sat down. The view was indeed better from here; the stage only feet away, every guest visible with the turn of your head. He took a seat beside you, getting comfortable as he chatted casually to the other people around the table.Â
Then he turned to you, snatching you out of a daze.
 âSo is this what you do for Draft then?â he asked. âReport on parties and events and stuff?âÂ
âWell Iâm a staff writer, so I pretty much just do what Iâm told,â you said, your voice laced with cynicism.Â
He smiled. âI sense some⊠unrest.âÂ
âYou could say that.â You drank down the dregs of your champagne, twirling the stem of the flute between your fingers.
He leaned back in his chair, cocking his head as he looked at you with narrowed eyes, an amused smirk creating a deep dimple in his cheek. âLet me guess, youâre trying to work your way into serious journalism, but all theyâre giving you is celebrity gossip and⊠listicles.âÂ
You pressed your lips together, exhaling a laugh through your nose. âI wrote this piece - itâs my best work to date - put it forward for an op ed but they werenât interested. Sent me here instead.â
âYâknow, this industry is⊠brutal. You fight to be heard, to have your work taken seriously, amplified, given the platform you know it deserves. Then you finally get recognised for that work after years and years of graft, and yet somehow it still ends up overshadowed by how fuckable women on the internet think you are.â
âYou are quite fuckable though, to be fair,â you replied bluntly.
He dropped his head to disguise a laugh, before composing himself again, lifting his head to meet your gaze. He stretched his arm along the back of your chair to lean in closer, speaking quietly. âWhat Iâm saying is that no one in this industry gets anything without going over heads and stepping on toes. Itâs a fight. And even when you get to the top, you have to claw at it if you want to stay there. Itâs like⊠the Hunger Games but for losers who watched the news too much as kids.â
You gave a slight smile, allowing a quick glance over your shoulder to Benâs table where he sat fidgeting with his hands, watching you beneath a heavy brow. You looked down at Leoâs arm draped behind you, your smile quickly turning into a smirk.Â
You leaned in closer to Leo, mirroring the intensity of his gaze. âSo youâre saying the only way Iâm going to transition to serious journalism is if I⊠play dirty?âÂ
âExactly,â he replied in a low, husky voice.
âHow do you suggest I do that?âÂ
He thought for a moment, running his tongue across his top teeth. âWhen I first started making docs, I got turned down by every production company, every channel and network. No one would give me a penny, wouldnât even agree to broadcast. So I said fuck it, went out there with my camera, whatever money I had in my account and I made them anyway. Then when these companies saw that people actually gave a shit about the things I was documenting, they came running to me.â
âSo youâre saying I just go rogue?â
âPotentially.âÂ
âHm. Thereâs just one problem with that; thereâs this thing called rent, and erm⊠needing to eatâŠâ you said sarcastically.
He laughed. âIâm not saying you go and quit Draft and start a fucking blog or something. Iâm saying⊠check out. Quietly quit, as they say. Attend the fancy events, write the fluffy articles, do whatever you need to do to keep your affiliation with the magazine and use it to your advantage.â He reached up and took your chin between his finger and thumb, turning your head towards the sea of tables behind you. âSee all of these people? Actors, producers, investors. You have direct access to them all right now. You could charm and persuade and get numbers in your phone and your name on peopleâs radars. And all you have to do in exchange is write a silly little article about their clothes and how they spend their evening.âÂ
You turned your head back to him slowly; his insight like an epiphany, turning the banality of your surroundings to an abundance of possibility. Ten minutes ago this man was a stranger, yet now here he was with his face inches from yours, giving you the best advice youâd ever heard.
âLet me interview you,â you said.
He leaned back, brow furrowed in curiosity.Â
âWhat? Iâve made a connection and Iâm using it to my advantage.â You shrugged. âIsnât that what you told me to do?âÂ
The corner of his mouth curved into a smile. âFair play. Though, an interview⊠with DraftâŠâ He scrunched his nose with scepticism.
âI wonât write anything about your looks. Wonât ask a single question about anything other than your work.âÂ
âItâs tempting,â he replied with a hum.Â
The lights of the hall dimmed as a single, bright spotlight illuminated the stage. A woman stepped up to the microphone holding a stack of cue cards and clearing her throat. Leo turned away from you to listen, and you felt your chest heave with a breath you hadnât realised youâd been holding. He was intense. Beguiling, even.Â
âWelcome everybody,â said the woman, her voice creating a screech of feedback through the speaker. She took a step away from the mic with an embarrassed laugh. âThank you so much for comingâŠâÂ
Your phone buzzed inside the clutch bag on your lap as the woman continued to speak. You dug it out and opened the message waiting on the screen.Â
I know what youâre doing.Â
You subtly turned your head, giving Ben a mischievous wink from across the dark hall.Â
What am I doing? you replied.Â
Flirting. Stop it. Now.Â
Your stomach fluttered as you pictured the tension in his fingers as he typed each word, the firmness of his jaw as he grit his teeth.
Flirting???Â
Quinn. Iâm serious.
Not my fault he fancies me. Iâm actually quite enjoying the attention.Â
As if on cue, Leo turned his attention back to you, leaning in to speak directly into your ear. âWhatâs so interesting on your phone?â His breath was warm against your skin, his hushed tone filled with playful curiosity.Â
You looked over at Ben again, smiling as you put the phone face down on the table, turning your attention back to Leo. âNothing.âÂ
âGood. Iâd hate to think I was losing your attention so soon.â
The woman on stage continued her speech, her words fading to a muffled hum as you lost yourself in the game you couldnât resist playing.Â
âYou havenât lost my attention,â you said, keeping your voice low. âI still want that interview.â
He chuckled. âYouâre persistent, Iâll give you that.â He leaned in again, his lips almost brushing your ear. âBut I donât think a formal interview is what you really want from meâŠâ
Your heart began to race, his proximity sending shivers down your spine. You could sense the shift in his demeanour, the hunger in his eyes. If this had been a year earlier, you were sure youâd have ended up in Leoâs bed by the end of the night. But instead, you found yourself more thrilled by the idea of Ben watching you; the power you wielded to make his blood boil from across a crowded room.  Â
âWhat else could I possibly want?â you murmured, tilting your head slightly towards Leo, your lips nearly grazing his cheek.Â
He let out a low, throaty laugh, his hand sliding from the back of your chair to your thigh. You wondered how far you could take things before your actions became indefensible, before the flirting verged beyond a game and evolved into something less playful.
âI have a feeling thereâs a lot of things you want.â His touch was soft yet bold, his fingers tracing swirls that tickled, even through the material of your dress. âSome I might be able to⊠help you with.âÂ
You bit your lip, unable to hold back a smirk, before leaning in close. âAnd here I was, thinking you invited me to sit at your table because you wanted to do a good deed for a struggling journalist.â You pressed your lips to his ear. âTurns out you just wanted to fuck me.âÂ
He turned his head to look at you, his face so close you could feel his breath. âCan I not want both?âÂ
âYou can,â you replied simply. âDoesnât mean youâre going to get it though.âÂ
The room erupted with applause, quelling the tension between you as you turned your attention to the stage. A young woman made her way to the microphone with a guitar in hand. She smiled shyly as she waited for the clapping to fade, before pressing her fingers to the strings and beginning to play.Â
Your palms were beginning to itch; every speech and performance receiving a lengthier round of applause than the last. You had no choice but to join in with it, no matter how boring or mediocre you thought it was, putting down your little notebook and pen with a quiet groan to bring your hands together in feigned appreciation.   Â
Youâd been nursing your second glass of champagne for most of the evening, knowing it was your last and taking small sips to savour it. Julia warned you not to get drunk, and youâd taken offence to the insinuation that you couldnât be trusted to stay professional. But when you realised Leoâs arm was still draped along the back of your chair, you thought perhaps sheâd had a point.
The last wave of applause rippled across the room as the host made her way offstage; the spotlight dimming, chandeliers regaining their warm glow as the atmosphere began to relax, the hum of conversation drifting through the air like a sigh of relief. You skimmed over the pages in your book, trying to decipher the chaotic notes youâd scrawled in the dark when Leo turned to look at you.Â
âGet everything you need?â he asked, nodding to your notebook.
âEh, Iâll probably have to employ some creative writing here and there,â you replied as you looked up at him.Â
He smirked. âYou werenât paying attention to any of it, were you.â Â
âMore than I would have if I were back there at the press table.âÂ
âWell itâs a good job I had a spare seat.â
âMm.â You allowed your gaze to flit from his eyes to his lips and back again, just enough to keep him interested. âI better do a few rounds, get some quotes from people before they start to leave.âÂ
Mingling had never been your thing, the idea of approaching strangers or interrupting conversations creating a pit of dread in your stomach that made your skin clammy and your mouth dry. Usually you came with someone else; dragged Nick along or found yourself on assignment with another writer who would do most of the talking. This time, you had no choice. .Â
You moved around the hall, weaving through a maze of tables as you searched for targets. And with each interaction, it became easier. You took quotes from a table of theatre directors, had surreal conversations with celebrities, and when you finally plucked up the courage to speak to Olivia Colman, the only thing you managed to write down was âaaahhhhâ.Â
You took a moment to breathe, scanning the room to see Ben still at his table, deep in conversation with another actor you vaguely recognised. You watched him for a moment, noticing how his usually easy smile didnât quite reach his eyes, how he kept brushing the tips of his fingers over his bottom lip. To anyone else, he seemed happy, comfortable. But to you, it was clear he wasnât nearly as composed as he appeared.
You made your way over, navigating the scattered chairs and waiters topping up champagne until you were close enough to hear their voices.Â
â...and everyone Iâve spoken to about it has said I should do it,â the other man was saying. âBut itâs just such a big commitment.â
Ben nodded, his eyes flickering in your direction for just a moment. âIt is a lot. But youâve just got to weigh up the pros and consâŠâÂ
He trailed off as you finally made it to their table, turning his attention to you as though he hadnât known you were coming.Â
âSorry for interrupting,â you said as you cleared your throat and held up your notebook. âMy nameâs Quinn, Iâm a writer for Draft Magazine. I was hoping I could steal you for a second to ask a few questions?â
His eyes stayed on you for a moment before returning to the actor beside him. âSorry.âÂ
âAh no worries, duty calls.â Â
âBut if you want my honest opinion, I think you should go for it.âÂ
The man smiled appreciatively as he rose to his feet, raising his glass in a mock salute before walking away.
You quickly sat in his place; the seat was still warm, turned towards Ben at an awkward angle. You shifted it further to face him, leaning back with the notebook in your lap.Â
âHi,â you finally said, holding back a smile.
âHi,â he replied, his face calm, tone unreadable.
âSo, the question I have for you isâŠâ you flicked to another page. âDo you have any thoughts on how we as a society, and as individuals, can foster the arts in ways that donât involve funding or monetary-â Â
âWhat the fuck was that?â he interrupted quietly, gesturing subtly towards Leoâs table across the hall.Â
âWhat was what?â you replied casually, defiantly.
He didnât answer right away. Instead he mirrored your posture, leaning back in his chair and lowering his chin slightly, his eyes darkening beneath the shadow of his brow. âHis hands were all over youâŠâÂ
âSo?â
âSo you knew exactly what you were doing.â
Your stomach fluttered with a mixture of excitement and apprehension. You cocked your head, widening your eyes to feign innocence. âWhat was I doing?âÂ
âTrying to piss me off.âÂ
You pushed out your bottom lip. âAre you jealous?âÂ
âJealous-?â He exhaled a laugh through his nose. But there was no amusement in it. Then he lowered his voice. âI was jealous when I saw him eyeing you up. I was jealous when he invited you to sit at his table. But now? Iâm not jealous, Iâm furious.âÂ
You regarded him for a moment, taking undeniable pleasure in his silent rage. But when you finally opened your mouth to speak, a hand on your shoulder made you still.Â
You looked up to see Leo standing at your side, glancing down at both of you with a charming smile.
âSorry for interrupting,â he said. âQuinn, my team and I are heading to an afterparty at the Edition. I wondered if you wanted to join me?âÂ
âOh, IâŠâ you looked at Ben, then back up to Leo. âThanks, but I canât. Iâm still working.â
âYour boss doesnât have to knowâŠâÂ
You breathed out a laugh. âNo really, I think Iâm going to be good for once and actually do my job.âÂ
âOr you could come with me to the afterparty and start being good tomorrowâŠâÂ
âShe said no,â Ben interjected firmly.Â
It caught you off guard, raising the hairs on your arms and sending a shiver down your spine. It was his unexpected harshness paired with a friendly smile, the restraint it was clearly taking him to keep his cool.Â
Leo seemed taken aback too, turning to him with raised brows and parted lips, like he wanted to speak but had no idea what to say. He eventually gave up with an understanding nod, before reaching into his pocket and pulling out a business card.Â
âGive me a call some time,â he said as he handed it to you. âIf you want, of course.âÂ
You took it with a smile, waiting for him to walk away before turning your attention back to Ben.Â
âThat was rude of you,â you said.
âSorry⊠Rude of me?â Â
You rolled your eyes and slid the card between the pages of your notebook.Â
âAre you really keeping that?â Ben asked.Â
âHeâs a documentary maker, Iâm a journalist. It might come in handy.âÂ
He pressed his tongue to the inside of his cheek and shifted in his seat, crossing one leg over the other as he continued to glare at you.Â
You couldnât help but laugh. âWow, you werenât joking when you said you were furiousâŠâÂ
 âNo. I wasnât. I told you the mind games and manipulation wouldnât fly with me. I told you that.âÂ
âYou are taking this way too seriously.â Â
He leaned forward suddenly, his movement sharp, teeth clenched. âToo-â But he stopped himself, pressing his lips together and looking around the bustling hall as he slowly reclined again. âWeâre leaving.âÂ
You furrowed your brow as you watched him stand up. âDid you not hear what I just said? Iâm working, I canât leave yet.â Â
âI said weâre going.âÂ
You hadnât seen him like this since the first night you met. Youâd almost forgotten he was capable of it; the hard angles and stern tone, the dominance of his demand sending a flutter through your core. The thrill of it was undeniable, but his anger was palpable, making you stutter as you tried to speak.Â
âBen, Iâm- Iâm not-â
âNow.âÂ
You yielded with a sigh, shoving everything into your bag and tucking it under your arm as you rose to your feet. Your heart was pounding as you began to follow him, almost tripping over the leg of your chair as you went. He didnât speak as he made his way to the exit of the hall, his fist opening and closing at his side in a steady rhythm, face brightening with a polite smile whenever someone greeted him as he passed.Â
He gripped your wrist as you neared the exit, leading you out into the large, echoing foyer. The indelicacy of his touch surprised you, flooding you with a fleeting rush of panic, like a child preparing to be scolded once their parents got them home.Â
Your heels clicked against the marble floor, your quick, uneven footsteps struggling to keep up with his long strides as he walked you towards a quiet, hidden corner.
âDonât you need to tell people youâre leaving?â you asked. âLike your publicist or whoever you came with?âÂ
âI came alone,â he replied, stopping once you were out of sight.
âReally? Why?âÂ
âBecause I drove here.â He glanced over his shoulder, assessing the paparazzi as they waited outside. âYouâre going to go and wait for me by the car. Iâll follow in a couple of minutes.âÂ
You did as you were told, emerging into the mild spring night and slipping through the chaos with ease. When you got to Benâs car, you waited with your arms folded over your chest, watching from a distance as an explosion of camera flashes illuminated the darkness like fireworks.Â
You pressed your lips into a straight lined smile when he finally reached you, hurrying around to the driverâs side without a word. He unlocked the door and pulled it open, glancing around to make sure he hadnât been followed. You raised onto your tiptoes to look at him over the top of the car, breathing out a laugh when he almost scowled back.Â
âAre you seriously still annoyed with me?â you asked.Â
âOf course I am,â he replied. âI can barely look at you right now.âÂ
He slipped into the car and pulled the door closed. You paused for a moment before deciding to climb into the back seat instead.
He looked at you in the rearview mirror, brow furrowed in confusion. âWhat are you doing?âÂ
âYou said you didnât want to look at me,â you replied brattishly. âYou donât have to if Iâm back here.âÂ
He rolled his eyes, letting out an exasperated breath. âGet in the front.âÂ
You thought about defying his demand, but you quickly gave in; choosing to clamber arduously over the centre console instead of getting out, purely to annoy him that little bit more. You settled into the front passenger seat, turning to look at him as you dragged the seatbelt across your chest.Â
He drove in silence at first, the journey ebbing and flowing between heavy traffic and dark, deserted streets. Youâd been waiting for him to speak, but with each silent wait at a red light, you found yourself growing impatient. He turned his head towards you, and you glanced back at him hopefully, only to realise he was looking past you, checking the road was clear before driving across it.Â
You huffed. âFine, you win, I apologise for flirting with the sexy man, alright? Can you stop acting like I slapped your mum now?âÂ
âYou really donât get why Iâm pissed off, do you.âÂ
âHe was just giving me career advice-â
âCareer advice? What career advice requires him to touch you like that? To whisper in your ear, run his hand up your thigh?âÂ
You couldnât resist; the old Quinn taking over with a shrug and a surly glare. âI was just having a bit of fun-â
A deep growl rumbled in his throat, his grip tightening around the steering wheel. âNothing about that was fun.âÂ
âMaybe not for youâŠâÂ
âQuinn. I swear to god.â
 You threw your head back and let out a groan. âIt was flirting, Ben. He clearly fancied me and I took the opportunity to tease you, wind you up-â
âOh yeah, and Iâm sure you got no pleasure out of it whatsoever,â he quipped cynically.Â
âOh Iâm so sorry,â you said sarcastically. âYâknow, itâs almost like I havenât gone the past four months without sex because the man Iâm seeing refuses to touch me anywhere below the fucking neck. I mean, Jesus, Iâve been masturbating so much I could give a teenage boy a run for his money; forgive me for indulging in a bit of physical affection for one night.âÂ
âSo you did like him then...â Â
âNo, Ben-â You stopped yourself, pinching the bridge of your nose and letting out an exasperated breath. But when you composed yourself again, your brows came together in sudden realisation. âActually, what if I did?âÂ
He took his eyes off the road for a second, glancing at you in confusion.
âWhat right would you have to tell me I couldnât flirt with him? Couldnât let him touch me?â You sat up straighter, turning your body towards him. âWhat if I wanted him to do that? What if I enjoyed sitting with him and decided I wanted to go to that afterparty? What authority would you have to tell me I couldnât?â Â
He rolled his eyes.
âWhat if I went with him? Danced, drank, let him take me home, undress me, kiss meâŠâÂ
Your words were getting to him; crawling under his skin, making him roll his shoulders like he was trying to shrug the image away.Â
âI mean, you said it yourself to whatshisface back at the gala; Iâm just Quinn, the journalist you met once back in November. Why would you care who else I fuck?âÂ
He turned the wheel sharply, pulling the car into a layby with a sudden stop. It was dark, void of streetlights, thick trees lining both sides of the road. You jerked forward as he broke, the seatbelt pressing firmly against your chest.Â
âJesus Christ, Ben.âÂ
He shut off the engine and turned in his seat to face you. âYou know full well that neither of us want people to know about this. You donât get to use it against me to justify flirting with someone else.âÂ
âI flirted with him to annoy you. Clearly it worked⊠A bit too well.âÂ
âBut why? Why would you think Iâd find that amusing?â His voice was raised, his hands moving in time with his words.
âI didnât. I thought Iâd find it amusing.âÂ
He growled, letting out a hot angry breath through his nose. âYou are the most infuriating fucking person.âÂ
âThen why have you stuck around for this long?âÂ
âWhy have you? If taking it slow and doing things right has been such a fucking chore for you then why are you still bothering?âÂ
You opened your mouth to argue, but he didnât give you the chance, unclipping his seatbelt to lean in closer.
âIâll tell you why. Itâs because you know Iâm the only man whoâs ever been able to handle you. Who sees you for who you really are and likes it.âÂ
Your heart began to race, your back pressing against the passenger door. He was right, and you hated it.Â
âBecause even though I havenât touched you in four months, you still arenât bored of me.â His voice was dangerously soft now, his eyes fixed on yours. âBecause even as another man threw himself at you tonight, you still found yourself looking for me.â
âSo if thatâs what you think, why do you care that I let him touch me?â you replied, trying to keep your voice steady.Â
âBecause I donât like watching someone else touch whatâs mine.âÂ
You swallowed hard, your defiance faltering as his words sank in. He was so close now, one arm outstretched along the back of your seat, the other holding back the urge to reach out and touch you.Â
Your eyes flitted from his face to his crotch then back again. âYou want to fuck me right now, donât youâŠâ
His gaze flickered with something dark, primal. He exhaled slowly, the angles of his face sharp with anger, partly with you, but mostly with himself.Â
A rush of excitement flooded through you as he reached out to cup your face, pulling you into a sudden, intense kiss. You could feel his possessiveness; the way his lips moved with a firm pressure, tongue sweeping impatiently into your mouth.Â
You fumbled for your seatbelt, unfastening it quickly and letting it snap back against the door, your hands immediately snaking around the back of his neck, pulling yourself into him. His hand dropped to your side, his touch rough, almost painful as he pressed and squeezed his fingertips into your waist. You felt him pulling you closer, his body radiating a heat that almost made it hard to breathe. His hand travelled lower, pushing up the material of your dress and allowing his fingers to graze the bare skin of your thighs. He ran his palm over the place Leo had touched, as though he was cleansing you of it, wiping it away and replacing it with his own.Â
Youâd been starved for so long that even his hand on your thigh made you tremble, a soft moan escaping your parted lips as he kissed you. The sound stirred something in him, and in moments you found yourself straddling his lap in the driverâs seat.Â
He was hard. You could feel it straining beneath his trousers, pressing against your centre as you tangled your fingers in his hair, your breaths hot and heavy, anger and lust fogging the windows like steam. You rolled your hips, the steering wheel letting out a short, loud beep as your backside knocked against it. But neither of you paid it any attention, giving in to the fevered, passionate release youâd been denying yourselves for so long.Â
His hands settled on your hips, gripping you firmly as he pushed himself against you, the friction drawing a satisfied groan from his throat. Youâd missed those sounds, the way it felt to have him desperate to fill you. But you knew he was losing himself, intoxicated by his own frustration. You were in a car, parked on the side of a quiet, winding road. This wasnât how he wanted it to be, and you werenât sure it was how you wanted it to be either.
You broke away, letting your head fall back as he began traipsing hot, hungry kisses down your neck. âBen,â you whispered breathlessly. âIf we go any further I wonât be able to stop.âÂ
You felt him pause, his lips still, breath tickling your skin.Â
âThis isnât how you wanted it to be,â you said softly, masking your disappointment. âWe need to stop.âÂ
He lowered his forehead to rest on your collarbone, letting out a quiet sigh. âFuck,â he whispered, his voice hoarse, thick with lust.Â
He pulled away from you, his hand lingering on your waist for a second longer before finally letting go. He sat back, his head tilting against the headrest as he closed his eyes, trying to compose himself.Â
You slid off his lap, climbing back into the passenger seat and fixing your dress. You looked over at him, watching him in silence, fearful of what awaited you when he finally opened his eyes. Youâd spent four months wanting nothing more than to see him break, to give in to you, and if it were anyone else, you would have taken full advantage of this lapse in judgement. But you couldnât.Â
The silence was awkward, moonlight casting a soft glow through the steamy windows, your slowing breaths providing the only sound. When he finally looked at you, there was a clarity in his expression; his jaw softening, eyes rounding.Â
âThank you,â he said.Â
There was something about the way he said it, like your restraint had renewed his faith in you, shifted something inside him.
You nodded slightly, reaching behind you for your seatbelt.
He nodded back, his gaze lingering on your face for a moment longer before finally starting the car again. The engine rumbled and he leaned forward to wipe the windshield, using his sleeve to clear it.Â
The tension remained as he drove, but it was different now. He was no longer angry, and you no longer cared to push his buttons. After a while, you gathered he was taking you to his house, and it filled you with a sense of relief you couldnât quite explain.Â
The road was empty, quiet, yet still the traffic light turned red. He slowed to a stop, resting his hand on the gearstick as he waited for it to change.Â
âIâm sorry,â you said. âAbout Leo. I really was just teasing you. I never would have-â
He reached out and took your hand in his without a word, giving it a gentle squeeze. You relaxed back into your seat, looking down at your intertwined fingers as they rested in your lap.
*Reader Tag List: @blondekel77 @evelynrosestuff @bakerstreethound @annesthaeticc @aephereal @sharp-cheekbones-locked @sherlux @veryladyqueen @graciebear47 @allurenia @jamerlynn @cottagecore-cat @aysamuka @thegardenerofeden @cumbercatchmebaby @inspirationalandrandom @turkisherlockian @swds @weepingdreamerpanda @elzabethann @childofgod215 @briecantopme @lovecleastrange @jaspearl31 @paola-carter @greatburger @azu21 @xourownsidee @hunterofshadows04 @asgardianprincess1050 @teddycrimson @sherlocksgirl91 @oliveoilthoughts @hai-kbai @shjl15 @bloodyxsaint @charleighsblog @stephenstrangeaddictions @omgstarks @sleutherclaw @bisciwri @theevilsupreme @druggedbyfiction @gwoods123 @classickook @coffee-d0t @strangeobsessed @januarycolor @strangeions @lonadane @downtownshabby @diabaroxa @stllbrln @thealleydog @cakesandtom @irisbutterfly @coffeebeing @lexlexigogh @mun7on @svntnpldis @belan-the-dilf-hunter @blxckdragonfly @detective-sherlocked @xdelulu @nicoletk @filmlock @bensherstrange @midnightramyeoncravings @coldnique @dearwatson @scailedandisolated @aphroditesdilemma @bergararyans @txylorrvelasco @classicrebound @hthrevr @happybunnyclumsyduck @c00letha @j3mj3rrica @ironstrange1991 @vi0letdaze @theothersideofthescreen @alessandra-cumberbatch @indiefilmfatale
#benedict cumberbatch#fanfiction#fanfic#fanfic writing#benedict cumberbatch x oc#benedict cumberbatch x you#benedict cumberbatch x reader#benedict cumberbatch imagine#benedict cumberbatch smut#benedict cumberbatch fanfic#Benedict Cumberbatch fanfiction#smut#smut writing#lemon#fanfic series#ao3 fanfic#the feature
72 notes
·
View notes
Text
are we EVER going to talk about the ageism against women properly?
bc it has been growing rampant in gen z and the arguments against it aren't exactly addressing the issue through examining the double standards people have for women and men.
yes, ageing is a privilege but i don't think that this argument is doing anything to dismantle the patriarchal mentality that is ingrained in our culture.
in many ways, people's counterpoint to "women expire after the xyz age" is basically "well, ageing is a privilege and natural so you should be ok with being an expired undesirable grandma whose only purpose is taking care of children bc at least you're not dead". we are never going to actually dismantle the ageism against women if this is our only argument.
we have to address the fact that women aren't allowed the same standards that men are.
men are allowed to have two types of desirability - a boy and a man. we don't say that men in their 50s look good *for* their age, we say that they grew well into their age, we simply say that they are attractive 50 years olds.
but women can only be and feel beautiful and desirable if they are young. if a woman in her 50s is objectively fine, we say that she looks good *for* her age, insinuating that there is no way she could ever *just* look good at 50, no "for"s, since she isn't 19-25 anymore and that's the only age range when a woman is truly attractive and desirable.
isn't this actually abhorrent? the fact that people can live up to about 100 years but women are taught to believe that only in 6 of these years they are in their prime? that patriarchy tells women that after their early 20s they are expired and the only valid way for them to be desirable and beautiful is to try to replicate the qualities of the 20 years old version of themselves that according to the same patriarchy, older women can no longer posses?
and the argument that women should not wish to be desirable at all in the name of feminism is very faulty, imo. it often comes from young and pretty women who don't really understand what being deemed "undesirable" in society means. the assumption that women being ok with the patriarchy telling them that they should feel expired after 25, should feel like they looked better in their 20s even if they take a better care of themselves now, should just do the "grandma" stuff while their male counterparts still get to experience romance and the life to its fullest, is not going to be some kind of a feminism win.
the "ageing is a privilege" has started to feel like an argument for women to once again settle for the bare minimum (at least you aren't dead) and conform to the unfair limitations the patriarchy forces on women.
i think what needs to change is us giving these misogynistic double standards any sort of validation. they are not rooted in some kind of universal truth about the inherent difference between men and women, they are rooted in patriarchy. we need to stop acting like younger and older women are in competition and start acknowledging that both are desirable and beautiful in their own ways.
i know that this post won't get much traction, but i feel like we need to talk about this topic more bc the internalized ageism that gen z women have is going to mess them up and the counterpoints to their assumptions are sometimes weak and unhelpful.
edit: thanks for yall's input in the reblogs! i would love to hear more from people so please feel free to reblog and say all that's on your mind regarding this subject since we really need to start addressing this and keep the conversation going!
#feminism#misogyny#ageism#society#culture#women#girlhood#womanhood#beauty#beauty standards#gender#equality#patriarchy
93 notes
·
View notes
Text
Testimonies of sexually enslaved Marxist revolutionary women
Women's bodies do not belong to women; they have historically been the property of men, the state and the church. Women's bodily autonomy and sexuality is a public matter that is based on oppressive patriarchal moral norms.
Sexual torture of women in a dictatorship is not just any kind of torture. It is focused on punishing women who transgress the gender contract that we have established in this heteropatriarchal society. Women who are fighters, emancipated, revolutionary are punished. The aim is to annihilate the freedom of women who have broken with established patterns and occupy public space.
During the civil-military dictatorship in Chile, women suffered torture in a different way than men. Sexual torture, based on rape, the introduction of objects and the use of animals to harm bodies, was common in torture and extermination centers. This practice has been made invisible, firstly because many women who were subjected to these acts do not speak about them, which makes legal proceedings against the abusers difficult. In addition, sexual violence is equated with "traditional" torture without considering the profound damage it causes in the development of women's lives and finally, because many of the abusers today walk free, unpunished and protected by nefarious pacts of silence.
Our bodies are violated, occupied and invaded, as an extension of the war. They are spoils for the agents of the State and for negotiating with capital.
Today, women are still punished when they break with the imposed stereotypes, that is why Nicole was murdered; the repressive forces of the State, forcing the lagmien Lorenza to give birth in shackles; they abuse women in police stations with impunity, groping high school students when they raise their voices. The judicial system protects violence against women by letting abusers go free. The State institutionally violates women through all kinds of discrimination.
We continue to resist, we are their political enemy. WE DO NOT FORGET WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DON'T RECONCILE For all of us, for a feminist memory. Feminist Propaganda Brigade
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
no but the way viserys continues to haunt the story through rhaenyra and alicents conflict, which gets passed down to both of their children, is crazy good content.
the irony in that viserys the peaceful was the one who started this war, and the downfall of the dragons/his family in the first place.
viserys and daemon had their own conflict, but when viserys alienated rhaenyra initially by marrying her best friend, he then ignored his and alicents children, eventually later his actions leading to rhaenyra marrying his brother (who he'd also taken for granted and ignored).
he then kept doting on rhaenyra up until the moment he died, further seperating himself from his own children by alicent.
alicent knows of rhaenyras affairs, grows hateful and takes that resentment out on her own children instead, while her father otto is further poisoning her and them for his own ends to scheme for the throne.
so then alicents children learnt to grow up disliking rhaenyra's. the only time you see them even remotely amicable is when theyre bullying aemond, another bond made through cruelty instead of kindness. this is ironic considering at laenas funeral you can see that aemond actually thinks about trying to offer comfort to i think baela and rhaena (if i remember correctly?)
aegon and helaena couldnt care less, which to me makes it even more sad. if aemond had, he might not have then been so quick to rub his claiming of vhagar in their faces, and he might not have lost an eye.
the taking of the eye plus viserys' incompetence reignites and cements alicents hatred for rhaenyra even more. viserys takes rhaenyras side, not defending his hurt child at all, even going as far as to shout at aegon for even the mention that he might have said something against rhaenyra. this causes alicent to attack her, and later making her then double down on her efforts to pressure aegon into hating rhaenyra, further distancing him from her.
later we see with aegon that his mothers pressure leads him to find affection in other very unhealthy and harmful ways, assaulting his maids, excessive drinking, brothel going, and assumably fathering many bastards, leading him tho the child fighting rings as well. aemond too starts going to the brothel and avoiding alicent, but for platonic affection instead of anything more.
helaena is the one who received the most of her mothers love and the least of her cruelty, however their relationship is similarly screwed up because shes the only child that doesnt actually want affection from her...
meanwhile rhaenyra is a very loving and fiercely protective mother to her children, fighting for them above all else, especially when their parentage is concerned. she does anything for them, and it shows in their natures that their upbringing, other than the scrutiny from other nobles about their father, that they were raised kindly and wisely.
whats also completely different is that rhaenyras children have not one but three father figures, all of which love them in different ways, which is three more than alicents children have. you could make an argument for cole being a prominent male figure in their lives but he is also quite cruel and hateful.
we see team greens children grow up to be anxious, affection starved control freaks, with mummy and daddy issues, with not one of them knowing how to be a leader even though they are all in some way forced to be one.
aegon is an incompetent drunkard of a king who knows nothing of court or war or politics, not even high valyrian. he is only a figurehead, but is strangely empathetic towards his subjects and loves his children.
aemond is cruel and objective, a fierce fighter and being the most studied and educated of them all, but with no care to his subjects and far too willing to disregard or maim his own blood for his own ambitions.
helaena is the gentlest but she herself has no ambition to rule, she is kind but also an outcast of their society because of her prophecies. she also does not particularly care for her subjects, even being scared of them and their willingness to get to know her.
meanwhile in complete contrast jacaerys and lucerys are kind, more than willing to learn, theyre fluent in high valyrian, they are very interested in their histories and heritage and they learn sword fighting from harwin and assumably laenor? later probably daemon too.
they stand in the war council room with their mother and learn, and even baela and rhaena are involved by rhaenyra to both take part and learn.
the generational trauma goes crazy in this show, but all these characters are so compelling. i dont think there is a single main character that doesnt interest me. yes most of them are bad people and have done awful things, but its also so interesting to see how they got that way and see how one fathers actions, or lack thereof, caused so much destruction.
#this was much longer than i thought itd be xjdjxjsjjza#ill also admit i havent read the books but i am planning to#so there may have been things i missed or got wromg#idk this show is really special honestly and its a breath of fresh air from the shite writing and pacing from the last few seasons of GoT#idk something about this being a 'mans world' but these whole events were started by tragic yuri is amazing#and until recently its been two women leading the two oppositions no matter how subtly they were leading#a man drove a wedge between two girls and they spiralled into thus#its art#also tragic siblings/family goes hard im ngl it always makes me sad#house of the dragon#hotd#aegon ii targaryen#aemond targaryen#helaena targaryen#alicent hightower#viserys targaryen#rhaenyra targaryen#daemon targaryen#jacaerys velaryon#lucerys velaryon#laenor velaryon#harwin strong#i didnt talk much about rhaes younger children because they havent gotten mich screen time yet#and also i havent read the books and hopefully avoided most spoilers sjdjsjdks#baela targaryen#rhaena targaryen#ace rambles
91 notes
·
View notes
Text
âMy reporting on stalking began in 2018, when I launched a national anti-stalking campaign, Unfollow Me, at my former employer Vice, in partnership with the stalking advocacy service Paladin. Using freedom of information laws, I found that more than 60 women had been murdered by stalkers in a three-year period, despite having reported them to the police.
Alice Ruggles, Shana Grice, Molly McLaren. I cannot forget their names. Their last moments haunt me. How Rugglesâ ex-boyfriend slashed her throat with a knife as she cowered from him in her bathroom. How McLarenâs ex-boyfriend stabbed her 75 times in a car park in broad daylight. How Griceâs ex-boyfriend subjected her to unthinkable terror in the months before her death â he let himself into her house and watched her sleeping â before murdering her, and setting fire to her body. All three women reported their stalkers to police, who did next to nothing. Grice, unbelievably, was fined by Sussex police for wasting police time. Itâs been six years now, and all I see is the same police apologies and hand-wringing. Nothing has changed.
What I believe underpins all of this is a rich seam of misogyny. Men â and it is mostly men who are stalkers, although of course they can be victims too â who feel entitled to womenâs time, their attention, their bodies and sometimes even their lives. And police forces that regard women as time-wasters and their complaints as histrionics, for objecting to this. Stalking victims deserve to live in safety and peace. Right now, as a society, we are failing them.â
176 notes
·
View notes
Text
Exploring the Relationship Dynamics Between the Abyssal Hunters
I had a few people either misinterpret or express confusion regarding this post that I made, so I want to make a different post covering the same (and more) material that's more rooted in explicit textual evidence which doesn't use emotionally-charged language. I'm going to try my best to stay neutral here and discuss multiple possible interpretations.
In short, I want to break down all that we know regarding the nature of the relationships shared by the four* Abyssal Hunters. In long, see below. And...I mean long, it's 5,000 words.
*Abyssal Hunters as a faction of Ăgir; sorry, Andreana. Note: Minor Path of Life (CN) spoilers below. None of the major events are spoiled, but I do talk about a lot of the context that the event gives us on Ăgir society and the backstories of the Hunters.
What we know from the text:
I'll keep this segment as objective as possible, and only state things that I can directly argue as nearly indisputable from textual evidence. Some interpretation work is going to have to be done here, however, and I'm open to anyone who disagrees with anything here pointing out the passages in the text that contradict my assertions.
Ages:
This is a subject the community as a whole is widely misinformed about, so I'm highlighting it separately.
We know from Path of Life that the expected lifespan of an Ăgir is around 150 years.
Gladiia is likely in her late 30s. She has 17 years of combat experience, which we're led to believe began relatively shortly after she received independence from her abusive, neglectful, and controlling mother. She was appointed as Consul of Technology before becoming an Abyssal Hunter, though her module description characterizes her as having been unable to decide the trajectory of her life, which implies to me that she was not free of her mother for very long before the operation. We don't have reason to believe Ăgir uses child soldiers nor appoints children to be Technology Consuls, so this places her minimum age at around 35 and her likely age as a little older than that. She was still characterized as a young Consul ten years after her appointment, so I don't believe she'd be much older. Late 30s is my best approximation; much older than that, and things begin making less sense regarding the multiple parental figures still present in her life.
Skadi is likely also in her 30s, though the actual bounds are wider than Gladiia's. She has 13 years of combat experience, making her 31 at the youngest. However, from Path of Life we know that she was the most skilled technician in her division prior to becoming an Abyssal Hunter. This means she probably had at least a few, if not several years of work experience out of the Academy. If she's younger than Gladiia, it's likely not by many years, and she could even be conceivably older than her. I think she's probably a small handful of years younger, if you had to ask me my personal interpretation.
Laurentina is the youngest of the Abyssal Hunters. She has seven years of combat experience, implying that she joined a decade after Gladiia. This places her minimum age at 25. We can imagine she's probably not too much older than that, since she never fully embraced a career as a sculptor before changing circumstances caused her to apply for the Abyssal Hunters. She's probably in her mid-to-late 20s.
Ulpianus is the oldest, and potentially by a considerable margin. He was the first Abyssal Hunter, becoming one twenty years ago, as well as one of the scientists who created the Abyssal Hunters to begin with. He was already one of the most preeminent scientific minds of Ăgir by this point. Since Ăgir can live to 150, this means the upper bound on his age is potentially very high. This man could conceivably be in his 80s or older without it breaking anything we know about the story. The lower bound of his age is probably somewhere in his late 40s at an absolute minimum, assuming that the Ăgirian process for becoming an accomplished scientist is anywhere remotely similar to the real-world one. It's completely up to speculation where his actual age falls between those bounds.
Connections between the Hunters:
An important note to make here that isn't precisely a connection, but does inform them: Ăgir as a society does not have a compulsion towards nuclear family structures. In fact, the opposite is true. From Path of Life, we know that Ăgir are usually raised in groups in dedicated schools. Ăgir seems to prioritize careers over interpersonal relationships, and direct blood family ties are much weaker. Ăgirian women don't give birth to their children directly; the embryos are surgically removed and then grown separately.
Laurentina's close relationship with her biological parents was noted as being somewhat atypical, and they still didn't raise her themselves. Instead, they allowed childcare services to raise her while frequently taking her with them on their trips when they could. Gladiia's upbringing, where she was isolated by an abusive and neglectful mother, is also atypical. From her conversation with Clemenza, we learn that she was in fact strongly suggested to give up Gladiia to childcare services, but refused to do so.
Onto the actual connections:
Gladiia met Ulpianus in the earlier years of the Abyssal Hunter project, when she was a young, emotionally vulnerable woman who was actively seeking new familial connections (see: her module). Given how well Ulpianus understands the other Hunters (implied in Stultifera Navis and displayed in Path of Life), it's very unlikely that he wasn't aware of this. Ulpianus declined his student Underflow's application to the Abyssal Hunters because he didn't want her to become like him. It's likely, then, that he personally processed Gladiia's entry into the Abyssal Hunters.
We know from Specter the Unchained's module that the two of them spoke at least somewhat often, discussing subjects like philosophy. In the one conversation we see, Ulpianus is explaining to Gladiia his concerns about the direction Ăgir is heading in these "protracted days of calamity," and she seems to either agree with or absorb his pontification. He certainly takes the lead in this conversation with the "young Consul," and while a mentorship role can be inferred from this, it's not directly stated anywhere.
From Gladiia's IS3 ending, we know that Ulpianus never directly indicated to her that he felt any connection between them, nor did he bring up concepts like seniority around her. However, his actual feelings concerning her were clearly more sentimental than he let on, as he unexpectedly sacrificed his life for the sake of his "junior." Gladiia hadn't realized he was so sentimental until it happened, but in retrospect she looked back upon it warmly, realizing she never truly understood Ulpianus.
We have fewer interactions between Ulpianus and Skadi than we do between Ulpianus and Gladiia, but we can infer something of a dynamic from what we do have. Ulpianus trusted Skadi implicitly. From Path of Life, we know that he treated her differently from the other Hunters in his company. Ulpianus was a brilliant tactician who gave complex plans to each of his soldiers, but when he got to Skadiâwho frequently spaces out when listening to others, and by her own admission in the event doesn't like to thinkâhe merely told her that he trusted her to carry out her duty. He understood her, and didn't belittle her for her weaknesses. He had faith in her, and was right to do so; Skadi completed every mission exceptionally.
In the Second Company, meanwhile, Gladiia and Laurentina clearly had a closer relationship than just their positions would imply. Gladiia considered herself Laurentina's teacher, instructing her not only in the art of war but also in life skills. Their first lesson was not in violence, but in dance (Specter the Unchained OpRec). Whereas Laurentina is now frequently associated with her dancing, not just in narrative framing but actively by Ulpianus in Path of Life, she had barely danced much at all prior to her dances with Gladiia.
Already by the time of her aforementioned conversation with Ulpianus, Gladiia had developed a fondness for her subordinate. She even smiled when she spoke of her glowingly, something she almost never does. Gladiia, as critical as she is of almost everyone, can hardly find fault with Laurentina. From the aforementioned OpRec, we see that even Laurentina expects her to lecture her more than she does. Frequently, when confronted with her peculiarities and the choices she makes, Gladiia will approve of them warmly. The OpRec also has a wonderful passage of them just talking and spending time with one-another. It's very warm and gives a lot of small insights to their relationship and their relationship with the arts (a subject they're both very attached to) that I can't really explain effectively here without exploding the already extremely high word count. I'd recommend reading it if you haven't already.
In short, though, the relationship between Gladiia and Laurentina is very warm despite Gladiia's frequent brusqueness and coldness. In Ăgir, they would see plays togetherâbut because of Gladiia's insistence upon minimizing distractions while experiencing art, would sit apart. In Specter's post-Under Tides OpRec, Laurentina had to practically beg Gladiia before she showed her any more warmth than would be warranted to any other subordinate, as Gladiia kept her emotions tightly to her chest. Laurentina's emotional intelligence and close bond with her allows her to see through Gladiia's practiced emotionless exterior. Like Ulpianus, she understands Gladiia well enough to see through the strong facade she fronts to get glimpses into the deep well of anxiety beneath. In Laurentina's story in IS3, their bond is described as so close that she doesn't need to speak with Gladiia to understand her. She continued to dance with her as their primary method of silent communication for months after Gladiia had ceased speaking because of how much she hated how the Seaborn assimilation had changed her voice.
Of course, Laurentina and Skadi also share a deep bond, which is probably the most well-known one. Though how well they knew each other prior to the attack on Ishar'mla is still somewhat unclearâthough it's clear from multiple sources (e.g. Specter OpRec, Path of Life, etc.) they weren't strangersâthe important bulk of their relationship concerns their time spent together at Rhodes Island on land. Tortured by the Church of the Deep's horrific experiments and driven insane by the originium that Bishop Amaia injected into her spinal column, Laurentina was in an almost unrecognizable state when she was reunited with Skadi (Specter OpRec). She'd developed a second personality called Specter as a result of her experiences, one that was fully unfamiliar to Skadi, and the real Laurentina seemed to be locked away inside her own mind, in endless sleep, unable to awaken.
Skadi took care of Laurentina. She was not easy to care for. Beyond just requiring intensive care to keep her alive, Specter was mentally unstable. She would be unable to leave her treatment room for long stretches of time, and if the way she spoke to Skadi during her OpRec once she'd 'fallen asleep' again is any indication, some of the things she'd say to Skadi were truly vile. To continually bear this cannot have been an easy burden to shoulder, but Skadi would nonetheless come into her room constantly, sing songs to her, and tell her stories. Laurentina heard it all, though she couldn't speak. Though she teased her for it mercilessly when she awoke after Under Tides, she expressed legitimate gratitude to Skadi for all she'd done taking care of her.
If their bond was not intensely close before, it is now. Laurentina, now awake, teaches Skadi to dance in Unchained's OpRec, just as Gladiia taught her before. Just as she can see through Gladiia's facades, Laurentina understands Skadi enough to be able to see through hers to the genuine, warm, and caring person she is. Skadi, meanwhile, goes to great lengths to make sure Laurentina is okay. She cared more about her wellbeing than she did about obediently listening to the orders of her superiors; when Gladiia came to take Specter from Rhodes Island, she protested, and followed Gladiia to Sal Viento to take her back.
Skadi and Gladiia do not have nearly as warm a history. Both are rather emotionally unintelligent and wear masks of indifference around each other. That isn't to say they don't care about each other, though; if anything, we have plenty of evidence to the contrary. Gladiia did not hesitate for a moment about risking death for Skadi's sake in Under Tides, feeling a duty to protect her from both the First to Talk and the monster that dwells inside her head. They share a bond of camaraderie that's constantly reinforced in every event.
In Stultifera Navis and its supplemental material, we got more inklings of the development of a deeper relationship between them, though it's naturally strained because of their natures. Skadi, who always calls Gladiia "Second Captain," accidentally called her Gladiia in SNâto which Gladiia brusquely remarked that she was getting rather comfortable around her. She corrected her mistake and hasn't made it since. In the oft-mentioned now Specter the Unchained OpRec, when Laurentina teaches Skadi how to dance she remarks that Gladiia would like to dance with her. Skadi brushes this off as a mean-spirited joke, but it's much more likely that Laurentina knows they both feel an unspoken fondness for the other and is steadily poking at them to share it with the other.
Lastly, and certainly least, we have Laurentina and Ulpianus. There's...almost nothing here. We know that they're not strangers, and from Path of Life we know that Ulpianus at least understands Laurentina well enough as an individual, but as far as I'm aware there's not much to suggest what sort of relationship they may have had beyond just comrades, if any. Ulpianus seemed to become disinterested in continuing his conversation with Gladiia once she started gushing about Laurentina, but that's more likely a case of him being averse to talks about feelings in general than it is any distaste for Shark herself.
---
Possible interpretations:
From this, we have a pretty good idea of the general shape of how these dynamics work. There's a lot of room to talk about the intricacies of their relationships, and I...can't cover every single possibility here.
I'd love to. If you ask me, I can keep yapping. I didn't write all of this because of some solemn dedication to archiving these fictional fish. Please, litter my inbox if you have questions. I can yap endlessly.
Instead, I'll focus on some of the predominant interpretations that I've seen across discussions and fanworks. Namely, the idea of the Abyssal Hunters as a family and the idea of some of the Abyssal Hunters as romantic partners.
I'll be covering interpretations that are both supported and not supported by the text to varying degrees. I'm going to outline how well I believe the text supports these interpretations, which is obviously going to be subjective, but I'm going to try to keep my own personal bias out of it. I have my own preferences, but I will be as neutral as I can be here.
The Family Angle
The Abyssal Hunters are a found family. That's not so much subtext as it is textâagain, see Gladiia's module about how she failed to find the warmth and belonging she sought from her biological family, and instead searched for a new family. They have dynamics between them that are clearly at least meant to mirror existing family dynamics.
But a found family is not the same thing as a biological family. It does not necessarily feature the same dynamics as you'd find between actual family members. The "family angle" is the interpretation that the relationship between all of them is in fact completely familial in nature. While found families do not preclude romantic and sexual relationships between their members, a familial relationship between these characters implies that their bond is strong in a way that is neither romantic nor sexual in nature.
This, in itself, is neither confirmed nor denied by the text. It's consistent with what we're shown, and is perhaps one of the more 'pure' interpretations of these relationshipsâin the sense that it doesn't read more into the characters than the information presented. The Abyssal Hunters are characterized in expressly familial terms, and so this interpretation says that this is the extent of their dynamics. For clarity, it is neither more nor less correct than other interpretations for this, and is not personally my own. If there's anything limiting this interpretation, it's that Ăgirians don't have nuclear family ties in the same way that we do, but that doesn't in my view contradict a familial interpretation as much as it modifies how it's perceived by the characters.
There are, of course, a lot of different ways you can approach the family angle. I'll outline some of the more sensible ones that can be concluded from the text.
One of the more common interpretations is that of the three female hunters as siblings. Again, there's no real confirmation of this in the textâonly sentiments that the bond between them is thicker than bloodâbut there's nothing in the text which contradicts this. They certainly could play into typical sibling dynamics fairly well, with Gladiia as the serious, beleaguered older sister who whips the younger siblings into shape, and Laurentina as the brattiest child of the family who's nonetheless more emotionally intelligent than her stubborn sisters. It's one I see a lot, and I don't really see an issue with it.
Another common interpretation is that there exists something mirroring a parent/daughter relationship between the Captains and their subordinates: Ulpianus/Skadi, and Gladiia/Laurentina. From what's been outlined above, there's definitely food for this sort of interpretation in the text. Gladiia, for instance, is definitely motherly towards Laurentina. I do not believe this is a coincidence; as someone who was failed by her mother in horrendous ways, she's taken on a motherly role towards those she cares for and whom she believes she has a responsibility for. I think this, in itself, is a fine interpretation.
I think it gets much weaker when it's taken a step further into a literal parent/daughter relationship between them. These are adult women. At most, the age gap between Gladiia and Laurentina is a little over a decade, and they were adults when they met. She might feel a motherly responsibility for this woman, but I do not believe she'd consider a fully adult woman only around a decade her junior to be her daughter. Friendships between people in their mid-20s and mid-30s happen all the time in the real world. They are not, by any stretch of the imagination, anything like real parent-child relationships. The age gap between Ulpianus and Skadi is likely wider, and thus it's more reasonable that Ulpianus would see someone Skadi's age that he met in her 20s as someone who could have been his daughter. Even in that case, their dynamic would be heavily qualified by the fact that he has always known Skadi as a fully adult woman.
One similar possible dynamic that I almost never see is the idea of Ulpianus as a father for Gladiia. They're of similar ages, and if he saw Skadi as someone who could have been his daughter, he surely see Gladiia as the same. Gladiia, as well, desperately needed a parental figure in her life and never got one. They clearly have a senior/junior, possibly mentor/student relationship in the text, even if neither of them explicitly acknowledge it as one. This is the logical next step, which many have taken for the other plausible parent/daughter relationships, but I never see this one.
The Romance Angle
People like shipping. I'm people, too. I like shipping. It's pretty natural that, when it comes to characters we like that have close relationships like this, there's going to be people who are primarily invested in slapping two or more of them together like Barbies. Some of these relationship dynamics are more plausible than others.
Here's where some of the objectivity might break down. I'll try my best to limit my personal bias, but it's extremely hard to speak objectively about topics that are so obviously subject to personal interpretation.
First, I'd like to emphasize that Ăgirian social dynamics, likely including romance, are alien to us. The likelihood that these characters would feel exactly the same about romance as we do in a predominantly monogamous society structured around nuclear families with a marriage at the core is...very low. Ăgir and the nations of land are fundamentally different in ways that make understanding one-another difficult. Listen to some of Specter the Unchained's voicelines expressing her frustration about how she doesn't have the means to convey to the Doctor everything she'd like to. While we can (and should if we'd like to) have fun with applying our concepts of romance to them, we should always keep in mind that they might not actually share them as characters.
On the more fun side, this opens up a world of possible arrangements. We can speculate, for instance, that these characters might be much more open to polyamory than others might. Or, perhaps, their courtship looks very different from ours, and we can explore how that might look through fiction. One relationship existing does not need to preclude the others even in our society, much less theirs.
The most obvious potential romance that most people would identify among the Abyssal Hunters is Skadi and Laurentina, and I have to agree that it's one of the most plausible, if not the single most. I...don't think I even need to linger too much on this one, because most of it's already been laid out. Their story reads like a tragic yuri plot. The romance is practically already written; if you showed me the exact same story that these two have, but they kiss at the end, it would not remotely feel like it came out of nowhere. It's one of many dynamics between characters that would be readily interpreted as romantic by a wider audience if, say, Skadi were a man. It's already one of the most popular Arknights ships as-is! It fits their characters, and makes sense as an interpretation.
It isn't necessarily the only interpretation of these characters, of course. As discussed, there's a wide array of ways you can interpret their bond, and many are just as supported by the text. While there's plenty of subtext that can be said to be romantic between them, that subtext can all be interpreted in platonic and familial ways. This is a Chinese gacha game; we're not going to get explicit confirmation of any of these relationships, and all romantic subtext will be written to resemble other kinds of subtext. That means that other subtext that was legitimately not meant to be romantic can scan as romantic. There's no strong argument here for authorial intent regarding the two of them either way.
...You can tell how strong the potential for a ship here is that I felt the need to use one of the two paragraphs I spent talking about it to discuss how it's not necessarily the only possible dynamic.
The second most likely, in my eyes, is Laurentina and Gladiia, which I'll elaborate further on than Skadi/Laurentina because of its rarity as a ship by comparison; it's legitimately plausible that most who might read this haven't considered it at all. Of the pairs possible within the trio, they're the two with the oldest history, who clearly have a deep and intimate bond. The exact nature of this bond is subject to interpretation, of course. As discussed earlier, Gladiia is quite motherly when it comes to Laurentina. A familial interpretation of the two of them is common, but as uncommon as a romantic interpretation is, I think it's both easily supported and already has plenty of material in the text to feed it. You can easily read the time they spent together in Specter the Unchained's OpRec as a date. That their dynamic has motherly characteristics does not stop it from being romantic. Plenty of romances in popular fiction have motherly elements to them; that behavior can simply be Gladiia's chosen language of love.
An issue that I can imagine is the power dynamic between themânot necessarily even as a moral argument about the ship, but as an issue between their characters. Laurentina was, of course, young when she joined the Abyssal Hunters, and Gladiia became both her superior and her mentor. I would be surprised if Laurentina was much older than 21 at the time, and I would not be surprised if she was in fact 18. Gladiia, meanwhile, would have been probably in the range of 28-30. While almost the same exact age gap would be present between Laurentina and Skadi, who would have met her at a similar time, the fact that Gladiia served as her mentor definitely colors the relationship in a different way.
As someone who clearly felt a responsibility towards Laurentina, I find it very unlikely that the nature of their relationship was immediately romantic. Even though Gladiia was immature in many ways and inexperienced compared to others of her age as a result of her isolated childhood and arrested development caused by her mother's abuse, she still likely would have seen a romance as unacceptable between the two of them. That may have even contributed to the arm's length she seems to sometimes keep Laurentina at, to the latter's chagrin.
However, critically, they aren't that age anymore. Laurentina is firmly an adult who can make reasoned decisions for herself, and frankly often showcases more emotional maturity than Gladiia does. Their situation is radically changed. Gladiia is still her commander, but she's her leader more because of mutual trust than any necessity to follow the orders of the Ăgirian military. They're no longer student and teacher; they're much more akin to equals now. There are now things that Laurentina can teach Gladiia; Gladiia is now the one who most desperately needs character development. The barriers that could have stopped their feelings from becoming a romance have eroded, and there is now the potential for one to form that is completely fitting within the bounds of the text and our understanding of their characters.
...
Okay, it's time to discuss the subject matter of the post I linked at the top of this one. Ulpianus and Gladiia.
...Almost everything I've just said about Gladiia and Laurentina applies doubly here.
It's the same dynamic. A junior who becomes an equal. It's much more common, in my experience, probably because it's heterosexual. Like with the other dynamics, there's nothing in the story that outright contradicts it. I do think its claim is weaker than the last two, though. I find it much harder to believe that Ulpianus would have harbored romantic feelings towards Gladiia.
She was much younger than him at the time they met, compared to the age gap between the other Hunters and Laurentina, andâas mentionedâhe was likely very aware of her emotional immaturity, vulnerability, and desire to form real connections for the first time in her life. Ulpianus is, from what we can tell, a very thoughtful man who understands his comrades very well and reckons solemnly with the consequences of his actions. As I put it in a previous post, he's a man who "constantly pontificates on duty, responsibility, and what 'ought to be.'" I don't believe a principled man like Ulpianusâwho is stubborn about principles to the point of contentiousness, who considers emotions to be secondary to duty and righteousness, who is prepared to throw away everything for what he believes in, including his life and his humanityâwould do anything that could be considered taking advantage of an emotionally vulnerable young woman. That seems incredibly contradictory to his character. Even if she's grown physically, I think it's easy to read from his actions that he still sees her as someone who's still immature. I think he would have a much harder time seeing Gladiia as an equal peer than Gladiia would Laurentina.
Now, to play devil's advocate somewhat, I will say that there's material within this to work with. The love of a man who won't even confess that he cares at all for his younger student, much less act upon his desires is a setup for what could be a great fan-made story. I don't personally think it could ever end with the two of them together while staying true to their characterization, but that's up for interpretation. This is, however, not the way I see this ship characterized at all. If anything, they're most popularly depicted as ex-lovers or the husband/wife of a nuclear family. I've probably belabored the point enough that I don't need to break those concepts down, so I'll leave it there.
Briefly, I want to pay some lip service to the idea I floated earlier of a...fish polycule. I don't believe that Skadi and Gladiia have the most romantic flags at present out of the trio, but (especially in the event that both of them are romantically involved with Laurentina) I can easily see them growing closer and eventually breaking down the barrier of communication between them that stops them from expressing their fondness for one-another in ways that aren't professing they'd want the other to kill them if they became a monster.
There's not a lot of material in the text for this, but that's hardly stopped anyone before. It certainly hasn't stopped me. I ship Gladiia with Lavinia/Penance. I don't need them to acknowledge each other's existence to see a line there; I'm not about to judge anyone for pairing off two characters who have had considerable screen time together, where one nearly died for the sake of the other.
Lastly, I feel like I should at least mention e.g. Laurentina/Irene and Gladiia/Kal'tsit. Mostly because this post isn't about those dynamics. I could talk about Gladiia/Kal'tsit. I could talk about the parallels in Gladiia's first IS3 scene, where Gladiia's recollections about her mother's neglect are immediately juxtaposed with Kal'tsit's concern for her. I could further elaborate on Gladiia's complex relationships with the concept of motherhood, and how Kal'tsit relates to that. I won't. But I could.
I don't even know if I ship Gladiia/Kal'tsit as a romantic couple. I just like their relationship a lot, whatever form it takes.
---
Endnotes.
Thanks for reading! I don't have a sweeping conclusion to finish with; the point of this post was just to compare and contrast popular fandom depictions of these characters with the actual material found in the text.
I hope you enjoyed, or learned something. I know there's so much goddamn text in Arknights that it's kind of impossible for anyone to reflect thoroughly on every single part of it. If you have any questions, criticism, or suggestions, my inbox is open!
120 notes
·
View notes
Note
I've seen many saying that LOV don't want redemption and it was better for them to die and it's really pisses me off.
What do you think of this? About the LOV dying because they don't want redemption?
Unfortunately, many people in this fandom seem to not understand storytelling or care about whether the content they consume is well-written or not (and even go as far as defending it!).
Suggesting the lov members don't want redemption is just the most obvious way of saying "I didn't understand these characters" and those same people probably also think the story's message of "you're a victim? discriminated against? a minority? hmmm... best we can do is have you die in peace. and you better be thankful for it :)" so I wouldn't worry too much about those people. All we can do is hope they get better.<3
The reason it makes zero sense to claim they don't want to be redeemed is that it indirectly also suggests that they don't want to live. But it is precisely that will to live that pushed them to villainy in the first place.
They all have shared experiences of being abused, neglected, ignored, discriminated against and/or overall being mistreated by people - both their families and society as a whole.
Growing up, the members of the lov just wanted to be accepted and loved, unfortunately most (if not all) people did not give them these very basic human needs, despite them all having been vocal about their needs from the very beginning.
With that, all that was left for them was to stand up for themselves, even when no one else would.
As the story progresses, we see that they love and want to be loved - namely by each other as well as certain people around them.
People want to live, the lov being no exception. And they want to be saved, but the world made them believe that there was no place for them to exist and be loved the way they are, a thought they decided to refuse. They refused to be killed by society - both in spirit and physically. They refused by being louder, by not allowing society to look away and ignore them anymore.
The lov is a cry for help. It's almost poetic how the fandom reflects the society in the story so well, claiming that they're "too far gone" when in reality, no one is ever beyond saving.
Claiming the lov members don't want to be saved is the same as the hero characters in the story telling themselves they somehow saved the villains and calling it a day even though they're all either imprisoned or dead.
It's funny because a few years ago people complained a lot about "mental illness being romanticized" especially online, but as soon as people see mental illness that they don't consider "cute" enough, for lack of a better term, we get horrendous takes such as "killing is bad, there's nothing left to do for these people :/ oh, but the abuser cried so he's cool now!!"
At the end of the day, people will have bad takes and claim their subjective opinions are objective even though they fail to deliver any substantial arguments or consider the fact that maybe, just maybe, people that relate to the lov exist and that the message they (the fans) and the story send is incredibly damaging.
So just a friendly reminder to anyone that does relate to the lov in any way, shape or form: You're valid and cool and deserve your needs to be met; to be loved and to be happy. Even if you're not crying and begging on your knees to be saved, you can still want to be saved. If fighting is all that's left for you then do because you deserve to live.
Finally, let me just leave you with this: Are these the words of someone that doesn't care about being saved or redeemed?
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/6cc9def13f337f4ccf7548dade43bdf8/203305d8fee94d85-87/s540x810/0e058a6b888a4a28dd6ec113505fd5b9343328b9.jpg)
59 notes
·
View notes
Text
"But everything Lady Whistledown wrote was true!"
. . .does it matter?
Is the price for cruelty truth? Does it cease to be unkind if it is honest? Was the bullying many of us were subjected to swept away simply because it was, in some ways, objectively true? Because I have been fat all my life, and the people who weaponized that against me were 'just being honest'? When it took me longer to answer a question due to my processing with ADHD, were people right to call me 'slow' and laugh just because it was true?
Are rumors okay to spread if they're 'true'? No matter how much they harm others? Is the hurt someone experiences at the hands of gossip inconsequential because it happens to be private information made public against their will- but is still, at the core of it, genuine?
Can we out queer people, just because it's true? Can we reveal locations?
Do the ends justify the means? How much blood is okay to spill in the name of honesty? Who asked for Brutal Honesty to knock on their doors? Or is it allowed to come into our homes unwarranted simply on the basis of existence?
Where is tender honesty? Compassionate honesty? Empathetic honesty? Gentle honesty?
My issues with Lady Whistledown, and thus Penelope's actions and how people defend them, do not rest upon the truth of them. They rest on the unkindness. They rest on the fact that Penelope wants to 'be better' but is still, at the core of it, revealing information that is not her business or right to reveal. That she herself was at the bladed end of that experience and cried and cried and cried- and still chose it. That she knows the pain she can cause, and does cause, and yet cannot let it go for the sake of the power it holds.
It's not all her fault. She lives in a sexist society. She is a woman who has been made powerless because of misogyny and then snatched that power back. In some ways, it's impressive.
But we have to acknowledge the cruelty of it. That the people who pay are predominately woman. Those she cares for. The disenfranchised. That she herself has paid. That Colin has. Eloise has. Marina has. Kate, Edwina, Daphne, Cressida, modistes, and countless staff who came under scrutiny have paid.
I just want her to grow in Season 4. I want her to recognize she can pursue her passions without gossip and rumors. I want her to write stories and go traveling. I want her to make new friends outside of what she can provide for them with the power of her publication. I want her and Colin to be in love knowing they're moving forward together, instead of him being a mirror for 'her light' as she burns herself out.
I want more for her than 'brutal honesty'.
#polin#penelope featherington#bridgerton#lady whistledown#i am a certified lady whistledown hater#so sick of this argument being an excuse#penelope hurt people- period#and continues to use her publication even after acknowledging it#she's just a person and i don't demonize her for it- i understand why she does it#but i can't see how her relationships won't be strained with the knowledge that she's out here spilling secrets and i want better for her#just let penelope grow as a person#we are literally watching in real time how gossip is harming the actors themselves#LW is just deuxmoi but y'all aren't ready for that tea yet
41 notes
·
View notes
Text
AFRICAN VOODOO
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/324d7e087f408c2c81b5d4fc369b2330/057b8ce90325c013-a2/s540x810/6ab8130135e4276dd924337d22e58032c85883ce.jpg)
The deep truth about AFRICAN VOODOO
African Voodoo: Unraveling the Mysteries of a Rich Spiritual Tradition
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/c864d2484df81bd83f6a88d1a5d815a1/057b8ce90325c013-b0/s540x810/8e7f36f036014face93adb5faa55d5469a51d0db.jpg)
African Voodoo, often shrouded in mystery and misconceptions, is a complex and fascinating spiritual tradition with deep-rooted cultural significance. This ancient belief system, practiced in various forms across the African continent and the African diaspora, offers a unique perspective on the relationship between humans, nature, and the divine. In this article, we will delve into the world of African Voodoo, exploring its history, beliefs, rituals, and its enduring impact on the cultures and societies where it thrives.
A Diverse Tradition
Voodoo, also spelled Vodou or Vodun, is not a monolithic belief system; rather, it is a diverse and adaptable spiritual tradition that has evolved differently in various regions of Africa and beyond. Its origins can be traced back to the indigenous religions of West and Central Africa, where it was practiced by different ethnic groups. Over time, African Voodoo underwent syncretism with Catholicism and indigenous beliefs in the Caribbean, particularly in Haiti, giving birth to Haitian Vodou, which is perhaps the most well-known form of Voodoo.
Core Beliefs
At its core, African Voodoo centers around the veneration of spirits, ancestors, and deities. These spirits are believed to have the power to influence human life and the natural world. Each spirit has a specific domain, and practitioners seek their guidance and assistance through various rituals and offerings. Ancestor worship is a fundamental aspect of Voodoo, as it connects the living to their familial lineage and heritage.
The Loa, or spirits, are a central focus of Voodoo ceremonies. These spirits are intermediaries between humans and the ultimate divine force. Practitioners often enter trance-like states to communicate with the Loa, who possess them temporarily during rituals. The Loa are known for their distinct personalities and preferences, and offerings such as food, drinks, and dance are made to appease and honor them.
Rituals and Practices
Voodoo rituals are colorful and lively events filled with drumming, dancing, singing, and the use of symbolic objects. Rituals are often held in temples or outdoor spaces, and they vary widely depending on the specific tradition and purpose. Some rituals are celebratory, while others are intended to seek protection, healing, or guidance.
One of the most famous Voodoo rituals is the "Voodoo Doll," which is often misunderstood. These dolls are not meant for causing harm but are used as tools for healing or connecting with a specific person's spirit. Pins may be used symbolically to focus intention.
Voodoo in the African Diaspora
The transatlantic slave trade played a significant role in spreading African Voodoo to the Americas, particularly in regions like Haiti, New Orleans, and Brazil. In these places, Voodoo underwent further syncretism with local beliefs and Catholicism, resulting in unique variations of the tradition.
Haitian Vodou, for instance, is a vibrant blend of African Voodoo, Catholicism, and indigenous Taino beliefs. It has had a profound impact on Haitian culture and played a central role in the struggle for independence from colonial rule.
Misconceptions and Stereotypes
African Voodoo has been the subject of many misconceptions and stereotypes, often portrayed negatively in popular culture. These portrayals frequently focus on the more sensational aspects of Voodoo, such as curses and zombies, rather than its rich cultural and spiritual dimensions. It's important to recognize that Voodoo is a legitimate religious practice for millions of people, and like any belief system, it encompasses a wide range of beliefs and practices.
African Voodoo is a complex, multifaceted spiritual tradition with a deep and enduring cultural significance. It is a testament to the resilience of African heritage and the ability of beliefs to adapt and evolve over time. Beyond the stereotypes and misconceptions, Voodoo represents a profound connection between humans, nature, and the divineâa connection that continues to shape the lives and cultures of those who practice it.
Communication with the spirits, often referred to as Loa or Lwa in Voodoo, is a central aspect of Voodoo rituals and practices. Here's an overview of how practitioners communicate with these entities:
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/e1a118e09910633c036cc02429203d53/057b8ce90325c013-fa/s540x810/a35d4e78cef1cfb1b8a72ac0e50642cdb20040a0.jpg)
1. **Rituals and Offerings**: Voodoo rituals are the primary means of communication with the spirits. Practitioners gather in a designated sacred space, such as a temple or outdoor altar. They often create an elaborate ritual environment with symbols, candles, and ceremonial objects. Offerings, including food, drinks, tobacco, and other items, are presented to specific spirits to gain their favor and attention.
2. **Dance and Music**: Music and dance are essential elements of Voodoo ceremonies. Drumming and chanting create a rhythmic and trance-inducing atmosphere. Through dance and music, practitioners enter altered states of consciousness, allowing them to connect with the spirits more profoundly. It is believed that the spirits may possess individuals during these ceremonies, providing a direct channel for communication.
3. **Possession and Trance**: One of the most distinctive aspects of Voodoo rituals is the concept of spirit possession. Practitioners, often referred to as "servants of the spirits," may enter a trance-like state during which a particular Loa or spirit is believed to take control of their body. In this state, the possessed individual may speak in the voice of the spirit, offering guidance, advice, or requests on behalf of the spirit.
4. **Divination**: Divination is another way to communicate with the spirits in Voodoo. Practitioners may use various divination tools such as tarot cards, cowrie shells, or casting of objects to seek guidance from the spirits. These divination practices help practitioners understand the desires and intentions of the spirits and may provide insights into their own lives.
5. **Prayer and Invocation**: Voodoo practitioners often use prayer and invocation to establish a connection with the spirits. Specific prayers or invocations are recited to call upon a particular spirit's presence and assistance. These prayers are typically passed down through generations and may be spoken in a specific language or dialect.
6. **Voodoo Dolls**: Contrary to popular misconceptions, Voodoo dolls are not used for causing harm but are symbolic tools for communication. They can represent a specific person or spirit and are employed in rituals to convey intentions, requests, or healing energy to the spirits associated with them.
It's important to note that communication with the spirits in Voodoo is a deeply spiritual and cultural practice, and the methods may vary among different Voodoo traditions and communities. Voodoo practitioners believe that these rituals and practices maintain a reciprocal relationship with the spirits, offering offerings and devotion in exchange for protection, guidance, and assistance in various aspects of life.
Masquerades and Voodoo in Africa: A Cultural Tapestry of Spiritual Expression
Africa is a continent rich in cultural diversity, and its spiritual practices are as varied as its landscapes. Among the many vibrant traditions that permeate African culture, masquerades and Voodoo (often spelled Vodun or Vodou) hold significant places in the hearts and lives of its people. This article explores the fascinating intersection of masquerades and Voodoo, shedding light on how these practices are intertwined with African spirituality.
**Masquerades: The Embodiment of Spirits**
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/4109b2966e6477e48fc90ad6f9a8a332/057b8ce90325c013-44/s540x810/efde6c69ad38d90777b94509287af6479821bb56.jpg)
Masquerades are a prominent cultural phenomenon across Africa, characterized by elaborate costumes, masks, and dances. These performances serve multifaceted purposes, including entertainment, social commentary, and spiritual expression. However, it's the latter aspect, the spiritual dimension, that ties masquerades to Voodoo and other indigenous African belief systems.
1. **Role of Ancestors**: In many African cultures, masquerades are a means of connecting with ancestors and spirits of the deceased. The masks and costumes worn by performers often represent these spirits. During masquerade ceremonies, participants believe that the spirits inhabit the masks and interact with the living. This interaction serves as a way to honor and seek guidance from the ancestors.
2. **Protection and Cleansing**: Some masquerades have protective roles in communities. They are believed to ward off evil spirits, illnesses, or other malevolent forces. These masquerades often perform purification rituals, symbolically cleansing the community and its members.
3. **Harvest and Fertility Celebrations**: Masquerades are frequently associated with agricultural and fertility rites. They may perform dances and rituals to ensure a bountiful harvest or to promote fertility among the community members.
4. **Social Order and Governance**: Masquerades also play a role in enforcing social norms and maintaining order within communities. They may act as judges, mediators, or enforcers of communal rules during their performances.
**Voodoo: The Spiritual Heartbeat**
Voodoo, a widely practiced religion across West Africa and its diaspora, is deeply entwined with masquerades and the spiritual fabric of the continent.
1. **Ancestor Worship**: Voodoo places a significant emphasis on ancestor worship, much like masquerades. Practitioners believe that the spirits of ancestors are ever-present and can influence the living. Offerings, rituals, and masquerade performances are ways to honor and seek the guidance of these spirits.
2. **Connection to Nature**: Voodoo, like many African belief systems, recognizes the close relationship between humans and nature. It views natural elements, such as rivers, forests, and animals, as inhabited by spirits. Masquerades often incorporate nature-centric symbolism in their performances.
3. **Trance and Possession**: Both Voodoo and certain masquerades involve altered states of consciousness. In Voodoo, devotees may enter trances and become possessed by spirits, similar to the possession experiences during some masquerade ceremonies. These states facilitate direct communication with the divine.
4. **Rituals and Sacrifices**: Offerings and sacrifices are common in both Voodoo and masquerade traditions. These rituals are believed to appease spirits and seek their favor.
**Cultural Resilience and Transformation**
While masquerades and Voodoo have endured the test of time and colonization, they have also adapted and evolved. In the African diaspora, especially in the Americas, they fused with other cultural elements and religions, giving rise to unique traditions such as Haitian Vodou and New Orleans Voodoo.
masquerades and Voodoo in Africa are vibrant expressions of spirituality, culture, and identity. They are living traditions that continue to shape the lives and beliefs of countless individuals and communities, offering insights into the enduring resilience and adaptability of African cultures in the face of change and adversity.
The timing for Voodoo practices, like many spiritual traditions, can vary depending on the specific tradition, the purpose of the practice, and the preferences of the practitioner. There is no universally "best" time for Voodoo practice, but certain times and occasions are commonly observed:
1. **Festival Days**: Many Voodoo traditions have specific festival days or holidays when practitioners gather to perform rituals and ceremonies. For example, in Haitian Vodou, the Festival of the Ancestors (FĂšt Gede) is a significant event where people honor and communicate with their ancestors. These festivals often have fixed dates in the Voodoo calendar.
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/e619c108612f780991e041ce4701d7b0/057b8ce90325c013-da/s540x810/f0bd357f6f036eb347cf25683f883f62c70c3767.jpg)
2. **Full Moon and New Moon**: Lunar phases are significant in various spiritual practices, including Voodoo. Some practitioners prefer to conduct rituals during the full moon or new moon, believing that these phases are particularly potent for spiritual work. The full moon is often associated with amplifying energy and intentions, while the new moon is seen as a time for new beginnings.
3. **Nighttime**: Many Voodoo rituals take place during the nighttime. This is believed to be a time when the veil between the spiritual and physical realms is thinner, making it easier to communicate with the spirits. Candlelit ceremonies, drumming, and dancing are common elements of Voodoo rituals conducted at night.
4. **Personal Preference**: Individual practitioners may have their own preferred times for Voodoo practice based on their personal experiences and beliefs. Some may feel a stronger connection to the spirits during specific times of the day or year.
5. **Life Events**: Voodoo is often integrated into various life events such as births, marriages, and funerals. The timing of these rituals is determined by the occurrence of these events.
6. **Consulting a Voodoo Priest/Priestess**: For more specific guidance on the timing of Voodoo practices, consulting a Voodoo priest or priestess is advisable. They can provide insights based on their knowledge and experience within their particular Voodoo tradition.
It's essential to remember that Voodoo is not a monolithic practice; it encompasses various traditions and regional variations, each with its own customs and beliefs. Therefore, the best time for Voodoo practice can differ significantly from one tradition to another. Additionally, Voodoo is deeply rooted in cultural and spiritual contexts, so practitioners often follow the customs passed down through generations within their specific communities.
![Tumblr media](https://64.media.tumblr.com/908e00a594e390f3bff3e02f190f03e0/057b8ce90325c013-51/s400x600/c0c30b15f1c4b219b64c93af8b1e9d69e22ea750.jpg)
#life#animals#culture#aesthetic#black history#history#blm blacklivesmatter#anime and manga#architecture#black community#heritagesites#culturaltours
267 notes
·
View notes