#this isnt for just mutuals btw

[orgasming-caterpillar]

Anybody here wanna join the Mahabharat roleplay server on discord? You can choose your own avatar

Taken are:

Madhav (meee:3)

Rukmini (@tothemoonandbacklove)

Draupadi (@btw-its-tamanna)

Karna (@h0bg0blin-meat)

Arjun (@prettykittytanjiro)

Subhadra (@ilovekrishnarjun)

Duryodhan (@hectorfrombritain)

Hidimbi (@blue-lotus333)

Will be updated later! Reblog for more members

[leroibobo]

really do not think people understand the extent to which palestinian sites/landmarks (especially muslim ones) were destroyed, beginning in 1948 until now, even in cities. the oldest extant mosque in jaffa (al-bahr mosque) was built in 1675, even though islam came there in the 7th century

[doecrossing]

I believe that misandrist women can still date/fuck men bc some of the most deeply misogynistic violent men on planet earth are still in fact married to women. in fact some men marry women bc they hate them. so basically if you think that misandrist women have to be celibate you're just holding women to a different standard to men. which makes you a misogynist.

[limonjarritos]

VINCE IS SO DOWN BAD FOR RODY OH MY GOD??? LITERALLY KILLS HIS EX GIRLFRIEND TO MAKE HIM HAPPY???? THEYVE KNOWN EACH OTHER LESS THAN A WEEK??????

LITERALLY LIKE- MY MAN FELL HARD AND INSANELY. LIKE WHO DOES THAT? I wouldn't have it any other way. Just the way that as soon as Rody came into his life he was like 'I need this man to be so whole-y mine.'

When I was playing the game my pet theory was that he fell for Rody's brand of love, for how he loved Manon (he did say that he spoke of Manon when they first met) and Rody's personality.

(read more because I am so annoying about this game vv)

Something something, how Rody loves so intensely to the detriment of himself (Manon told him to stop giving, to for once in his life realise that he needed to take care of him self and be stable. He can't just account for the other person's needs <- barely know her but I get why Rody was head over heels). How Rody's love is similar to his cooking, burning, burning himself, burning and oh so overwhelming. And I do think Vince wanted the feel of that burn for himself, wanted to feel the warmth and devotion of which he had been so devoid of. To understand what it was he was lacking. How love and cooking go hand in hand in the story, how Vince's dishes were devoid of love, how he can't taste. How Rody's love surely would be strong enough, would be the missing ingredient to allow him to finally taste something. (Also lack of taste going hand in hand with what looks like depression of some sort, or perhaps just apathy for life. How bland his own life may be. How such a love, such a person could perhaps bring some taste to his life.) Vince seems to have killed Manon as a form of trying to show Rody a similar type of love. Giving him something, giving him a meal made out of Rody's own love. A gift since he couldn't give his own brand of love in a way that matters, couldn't give it without showing his own brand of devotion. I do think he 100% had an underlying jealousy and hatred of Manon, how Rody was still stuck up on her. How she never once mentioned Rody when her and Vince dated (though outside of Vince's pov I'm pretty sure Manon was just doing the healthy normal thing by not mentioning an ex?? but Vince is soooo gone) which is obviously a sin (he doesn't seem to take kindly to people who are mean to Rody. Such as the article and Rody's old college classmate) and proof she wasn't deserving enough of Rody's love. But alas she was still a gift and show of love to Rody.

On the personality topic (thought I forgot about that did you?), Rody is such a brash and kind person. A perfect foil for Vincent's more stoic nature. Rody willing to try and befriend Vincent, running into the kitchen to talk to him. He showed a bit of said love to Vince by trying to befriend him and how could Vince not want more? (why wouldn't Vince try to reciprocate in his own way. Make him happy) I mean he seems pretty feared by his cooks, and the people at the party have mentioned that Vince is pretty ruthless, not at all a person many wish to get to know. But Rody is willing to, yet Vince wants his undivided attention...

Okay wow this has gone on way too long uhh I'm 100% open to further discussion especially if I forgot something! And I haven't really looked too much into the game past playing it, so any reveals the creator may have given I'm mostly unaware of and would love to be informed of more!

Anyways tiny Vincent attack!

[humblemediagenius]

The need to share my OCs with everyone vs the fear that people won't be FUCKING NORMAL FOR THE LOVE OF GOD

[taashed]

i love coming on here and finding out everyone lost their damn mind while i slept

[cerealmonster15]

Hello!! :D if you’re still taking art reqs for the drawing meme maybe 1A or 2A for Autumn Oak/Linda Stampler please?

THANK YOU!!! :] 

YES this is how i know i've made it as a dndads fanartist - the rite of passage of receiving the autumn/linda request jsklfjdsl MILESTONE ACHIEVED!!!

i had to kinda fumble around my brain a bit to come up w/some designs so maybe theyll change!! who knows!!!

[send a pose prompt!]

[lex-the-lesbiann]

Gnaw by Alex G is a normscary song to me. to me.

[gece-misin-nesin]

Regarding Batman and Responsibility: A Rant

So, whenever there is talk about the age old question of "Should Batman kill Joker?" there is always, and I mean always someone who says something along the lines of: "But it's not Batman's responsibility to kill Joker so it's wrong to put the burden onto him." and on the surface this seems like a reasonable argument. After all, there is a police department in gotham, there is a government, so shouldn't we hold them accountable as well? Well, not exactly.

(Warning: I probably mispelled responsibility and responsible a LOT in this post, please don't begrudge me for it.)

Of course, those institutions ARE responsible for the Joker to some degree but the real question, to me, is: why is Batman considered as "NOT responsible" when he very much is.

People who make this argument usually say: "Well Batman is a volunteer, a vigilante! This is practically none of his bussiness." And true, Bruce isn't required to be a vigilante, he does it entirely out of his own volition. But is that not the whole reason why he IS responsible? I mean, Bruce is the one who CHOSE to take up that responsibilty, he is the one who CHOSES to shoulder that burden. In that sense he isn't that different from a government official/cop/etc. those people do it of their on will too don't they? Bruce, day after day, year after year, choses to fight for Gotham, to protect it and its people; he takes those responsibilities onto himself and yet... stopping Joker somehow, isn't one of them?

In my opinion, it is hypocritical. Bruce is the one who says things like "Gotham is MY city" or "I don't allow metas in Gotham, you need MY permission." or "You can't operate as a vigilante in Gotham without my say-so."(Stephanie Brown, anyone?) he routinely describes his vigilantism as a "war on crime"(which, yikes) and calls it a "crusade" and says it is his "mission" no? He chooses to do these things all on his own, no one forces him to. At a certain point, it's a matter of integrity. He can't pick and choose what exactly constitutes to protecting Gotham and what doesn't. He can't decide that beating up muggers in the streets is extremely important and is his job while improving Arkham isn't. He can't decide that, despite putting Joker in Arkham over and over again knowing he's going to escape, he isn't at least partly responsible for Joker's future victims. He can't keep stopping people from killing Joker(Under the Red Hood, hello!), saving Joker from the death row, putting Joker into a Lazarus Pit, or saving him from natural disasters(because you KNOW he would) and then claim "Oh, but killing Joker isn't my responsibility." He can't willingly claim responsibility for Gotham in every other scenario, EXCEPT for that. That's just having your cake and trying to eat it too. Unless he decided that by saving Joker he is not actually harming Gotham, by allowing Joker to live he is actively NEGLECTING his mission, his duty. And anyway, I thought the whole point of superhero comics was that people with power to better things shoud use those powers to do exactly that. Batman DOES have the power to "better" Gotham, he just isn't using it.

"Killing Joker isn't Batman's responsibility." No, it is. Because protecting Gotham and its people IS his responsibility, as he took it onto himself. If he didn't want to deal with the consequences of such a thing then he shouldn't have become a vigilante in the first place.

Mind you, this doesn't mean he's the ONLY one responsible, far from it, just that he is.

(I genuinely don't remember whether I made a post on this before but I have ranted about this to myself outloud when alone multiple times and if I have to think about this so do you)

[And YES we all know the real reason is because Joker is DC's cashcow, that is not the point of this post...]

[jerrsterrr]

shakes you @silliemop's Real Steel Au!!!

some silly headcanons?? designs?? (i hav many more)

A BIT OF BRAINROT YEAH

[tchaikovskaya]

ive felt this way pretty firmly for over a year now and held off on trying to put it into words that i would be sharing with other people online (lol) but like..... some people really and truly were/are upset that the pandemic is over. like actual overgrown hall monitor ass adults feel/felt bereft of this schtick that they latched onto for reasons that were initially totally morally righteous but quickly became more about being Right and Following the Rules and being a Good Noodle

btw i am saying this as someone who wore a mask indoors pretty regularly as late as like... mid october 2022. and still wear one in public when i have a cough or a cold or something. im not an anti-vaxxer and i do care about public health and other people's wellbeing!

"x number of people are still dying of covid every week" yeah thats bad. its bad when people die of viral diseases for which there are vaccines. herd immunity (the proper meaning of the term) bc of mass vaccination is the ideal. the same applies to the goddamn flu. people die of the flu every year. covid is just part of the array of viral diseases that live among us and arent going anywhere.

what is even your end goal in insisting "this pandemic isnt over!!!!" like what is the Purpose of that? other than to make you feel like a crusader for the public good as you see it and the ONLY ONE who still Actually Cares About People? and not just to feel like that, more importantly to be seen as that.

if you could command society to do exactly what you felt would be right to address this crisis you insist we are still embroiled in, what would you actually have us do? the extended lockdown actually-taken-seriously ship sailed by early fall 2020 tbh. after that point it was always going to be about mitigating the disaster that never had to get that bad but it did.

[pineapplesaresweet]

I was told to post this by @justneo

[mossyflowers]

Okay u know what I'm not cleaning this up but still throwing it out because I think it's cool

[loveregrown]

What even is the point of the world if there's no crazy dyke sex......... it would be inhumane

[meejijis]

>Wants to finish drawing a YoyoxAnna fanart I did last year

>But also doesn't want to post it as I had bad history with the SK fandom and don't want to attract anyone from the eng fandom

>Wants to post a funny meme regarding the SK sequels

>But also doesn't want to post it because once again have a bad history with the fandom

Sigh

[fujouppy]

sakura aromantic hc on the head rn